On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 19:18:53 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
You've lost, literally, EVERY debate you've been in since I
became aware of your existence. It's reasonable to expect you lost
every one since before that.
Example?
Uh, you want an example that I'm serious? How, exactly, would I
go about providing an example that I am serious about asking you to
get the professional mental health care you need for your lying?
On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 19:15:00 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>message >>news:249lfk97hinms58fjvjq4onfrr891e1141@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 13:01:45 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>message >>>>news:ud4dfk1f93u5sk71fhrjnr5cbcin3nealk@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 13:40:06 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>message >>>>>>news:o1d0eklvrrmhgqf2730i4j8ddadc84g8tf@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 14:21:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"Yes I can, becouse it's STEVE'S responsibiiliy to repond to anything I >>>>>>say,
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Bryan Simmons" <bryangsimmons@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>news:1864152572eb7c8c$17375$2267736
Hey, and has anyone heard from Steve Wertz? We were kind of >>>>>>>>> frenemies
for
years, but recently he never answered my emails. He told
rec.food.cooking
to go fuck itself, but maybe that was Usenet in general.
I'll see if I can find out. Once it is official that he is gone, >>>>>>>>then
I
can
declare *final* victory on every debate we ever had.
You'll never be able to declare victory on *any* debate you've had. >>>>>>
and if he doesn't, well that his problem.
"Not responding" does not equal "victory"
Of course not. But failing to deal with the issue at hand, DOES.
Is that why you've lost every "debate" you and I have had?
I haven't lost any debate with you, klous,
you pretend to be stupid, that you "didn't see" responses,
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:hiroikl2c4l8k6v84un82o1p2eukdh0uno@4ax.com...
On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 19:18:53 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
You've lost, literally, EVERY debate you've been in since I
became aware of your existence. It's reasonable to expect you lost >>>>every one since before that.
Example?
Uh, you want an example that I'm serious? How, exactly, would I
go about providing an example that I am serious about asking you to
get the professional mental health care you need for your lying?
IOW, you have NO EXAMPLE of a debate that I lost.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:bc3pik5llgc2jkqb4r69l4ogos09rp2lcu@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 19:15:00 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>message >>>news:249lfk97hinms58fjvjq4onfrr891e1141@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 13:01:45 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>message >>>>>news:ud4dfk1f93u5sk71fhrjnr5cbcin3nealk@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 13:40:06 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>message >>>>>>>news:o1d0eklvrrmhgqf2730i4j8ddadc84g8tf@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 14:21:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"Yes I can, becouse it's STEVE'S responsibiiliy to repond to anything I >>>>>>>say,
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Bryan Simmons" <bryangsimmons@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>news:1864152572eb7c8c$17375$2267736
Hey, and has anyone heard from Steve Wertz? We were kind of >>>>>>>>>> frenemies
for
years, but recently he never answered my emails. He told
rec.food.cooking
to go fuck itself, but maybe that was Usenet in general.
I'll see if I can find out. Once it is official that he is gone, >>>>>>>>>then
I
can
declare *final* victory on every debate we ever had.
You'll never be able to declare victory on *any* debate you've had. >>>>>>>
and if he doesn't, well that his problem.
"Not responding" does not equal "victory"
Of course not. But failing to deal with the issue at hand, DOES.
Is that why you've lost every "debate" you and I have had?
I haven't lost any debate with you, klous,
you pretend to be stupid, that you "didn't see" responses,
You constantly say that you "already answered" questions
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:hiroikl2c4l8k6v84un82o1p2eukdh0uno@4ax.com...
On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 19:18:53 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 13:01:05 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>>news:0ui1ek54cg9jp8qfmvabopkonjcj9qc6dr@4ax.com...
On Fri, 03 Oct 2025 13:38:38 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 14:21:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk" >>>>>>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:Jenny has lost, literally, EVERY debate he's been in since I >>>>>>became aware of his existence. It's reasonable to expect he's lost >>>>>>every one since before that.
"Bryan Simmons" <bryangsimmons@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>news:1864152572eb7c8c$17375$2267736
Hey, and has anyone heard from Steve Wertz? We were kind of frenemies
for
years, but recently he never answered my emails. He told
rec.food.cooking
to go fuck itself, but maybe that was Usenet in general.
I'll see if I can find out. Once it is official that he is gone, then I
can
declare *final* victory on every debate we ever had.
You'll never be able to declare victory on *any* debate you've had. >>>>>>
That's a lie.
How, in reality and NOT your mental illness, is it unreasonable?
Jenny?
I have won MANY debate's,
Your LYING via an apostrophe is acknowledged.
Jenny?
including many with you, kwills.
That nym has ever been used in this group. Once again you feed >>>>your very real NEED to lie.
Jenny?
If you mean me, I did use KWills. And you LOST every debate we've >>>>had. Each and every one. No amount of your feeding your NEED to lie >>>>will ever alter this TRUTH.
Jenny?
Changing your screen name does change the fact I've beeten you at debate's.
Ibid.
Jenny?
You've lost, literally, EVERY debate you've been in since I
became aware of your existence. It's reasonable to expect you lost >>>>every one since before that.
Please get the professional mental health care you need for your >>>>lying. I'm serious.
Example?
Uh, you want an example that I'm serious? How, exactly, would I
go about providing an example that I am serious about asking you to
get the professional mental health care you need for your lying?
Don't waste time feeding your NEED to lie. Don't play avoidance
games. Answer, and answer HONESTLY.
I realize the mere idea of honesty fills you with anxiety. Fight
your way through it. Answer my questions honestly.
[Cue Jenny running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]
IOW, you have NO EXAMPLE of a debate that I lost.
Thank you for confirming that.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:bc3pik5llgc2jkqb4r69l4ogos09rp2lcu@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 19:15:00 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>message >>>news:249lfk97hinms58fjvjq4onfrr891e1141@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 13:01:45 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>message >>>>>news:ud4dfk1f93u5sk71fhrjnr5cbcin3nealk@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 13:40:06 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>message >>>>>>>news:o1d0eklvrrmhgqf2730i4j8ddadc84g8tf@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 14:21:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"Yes I can, becouse it's STEVE'S responsibiiliy to repond to anything I >>>>>>>say,
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Bryan Simmons" <bryangsimmons@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>news:1864152572eb7c8c$17375$2267736
Hey, and has anyone heard from Steve Wertz? We were kind of >>>>>>>>>> frenemies
for
years, but recently he never answered my emails. He told
rec.food.cooking
to go fuck itself, but maybe that was Usenet in general.
I'll see if I can find out. Once it is official that he is gone, >>>>>>>>>then
I
can
declare *final* victory on every debate we ever had.
You'll never be able to declare victory on *any* debate you've had. >>>>>>>
and if he doesn't, well that his problem.
"Not responding" does not equal "victory"
Of course not. But failing to deal with the issue at hand, DOES.
Is that why you've lost every "debate" you and I have had?
I haven't lost any debate with you, klous,
you pretend to be stupid, that you "didn't see" responses,
You constantly say that you "already answered" questions that you
previously never answered, and even it you DID, YOU WOULD RATHER ANSWER 25+ >times that you "already answered" someting, instead of just POSTING A SIMPLE >ANSWER.
The logic is simple... it is easier for you to say "I already answered" >rather then the more accurate, "i already lost".
As of the time I
write this, you've lost EVERY debate you've had in the group since I
joined.
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.Het> wrote in message >news:vho9lk9q25a307tqecupq3trb7l2ifqrf8@4ax.com...
As of the time I
write this, you've lost EVERY debate you've had in the group since I
joined.
Your lying is acknowledged
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.Het> wrote in message >news:vho9lk9q25a307tqecupq3trb7l2ifqrf8@4ax.com...
On Tue, 30 Dec 2025 13:04:25 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>news:bc3pik5llgc2jkqb4r69l4ogos09rp2lcu@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 19:15:00 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>message >>>>>news:249lfk97hinms58fjvjq4onfrr891e1141@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 13:01:45 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>message >>>>>>>news:ud4dfk1f93u5sk71fhrjnr5cbcin3nealk@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 13:40:06 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>message >>>>>>>>>news:o1d0eklvrrmhgqf2730i4j8ddadc84g8tf@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 14:21:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"Yes I can, becouse it's STEVE'S responsibiiliy to repond to anything I >>>>>>>>>say,
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Bryan Simmons" <bryangsimmons@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>news:1864152572eb7c8c$17375$2267736
Hey, and has anyone heard from Steve Wertz? We were kind of >>>>>>>>>>>> frenemiesI'll see if I can find out. Once it is official that he is gone, >>>>>>>>>>>then
for
years, but recently he never answered my emails. He told >>>>>>>>>>>> rec.food.cooking
to go fuck itself, but maybe that was Usenet in general. >>>>>>>>>>>
I
can
declare *final* victory on every debate we ever had.
You'll never be able to declare victory on *any* debate you've had. >>>>>>>>>
and if he doesn't, well that his problem.
"Not responding" does not equal "victory"
Of course not. But failing to deal with the issue at hand, DOES.
Is that why you've lost every "debate" you and I have had?
I haven't lost any debate with you, klous,
you pretend to be stupid, that you "didn't see" responses,
You constantly say that you "already answered" questions that you >>>previously never answered, and even it you DID, YOU WOULD RATHER ANSWER 25+ >>>times that you "already answered" someting, instead of just POSTING A SIMPLE
ANSWER.
The logic is simple... it is easier for you to say "I already answered" >>>rather then the more accurate, "i already lost".
He would need to lose to make such a claim. As of the time I
write this, you've lost EVERY debate you've had in the group since I >>joined. It's very probable you will continue to lose every debate you
have in the future.
[Cue Jenny running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]
Your lying is acknowledged
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 54 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 18:07:12 |
| Calls: | 742 |
| Files: | 1,218 |
| D/L today: |
4 files (8,203K bytes) |
| Messages: | 184,416 |
| Posted today: | 1 |