"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:dfroikh3l67pdl8ctqug9uc1rkp729alec@4ax.com...
Yes, it does since only people with a mental illness that makes
them NEED to lie, and/or a profound learning disability, would ever
think cat food could, in any reasonable way, be considered to be for
human consumption.
Nobody ever said that cat food WAS OR WAS NOT for humna consumption.
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >news:dfroikh3l67pdl8ctqug9uc1rkp729alec@4ax.com...
On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 19:06:52 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
NO IT DOESN'T, THE DICTIONARY'S JOB IS TO DEFINE WORDS, NOT ASSUME THAT >>>>>>>PEOPLE ALREADY KNOW THEM.
It assumes people can read English.
WIKIPEDIA SAYS:
Fast food is a type of mass-produced food designed for commercial
resale, with a strong priority placed on speed of service.
It assumes you know it's not talking about commercially manufactured >>>>>> cat food.
It doesn't say that.
It assumes you know it's not talking about commercially manufactured
cat food.
No it doesn't.
Yes, it does since only people with a mental illness that makes
them NEED to lie, and/or a profound learning disability, would ever
think cat food could, in any reasonable way, be considered to be for
human consumption.
It assumes you DON'T know that, which would be the reason
why your consulting the dictionary in teh
Your LYING, via spelling, is acknowledged.
FIRST place. Dictionary's
Your LYING, via an apostrophe, is acknowledged.
don't
assume that people reading the deifnation's
Your LYING, via spelling and an apostrophe, is acknowledged.
already know what they are.
You LIED and presented that cat food is intended for HUMAN
consumption as it is the ONLY way you could claim it is fast food. And
you did make that claim, no matter how often you feed your mental
illness' NEED for you to lie.
Now, to further feed your NEED to lie, the one you've PROVED you
have because of your mental illness, you LIE and claim you didn't.
This, despite that the six or so people who read the group (you're
still free to prove your LIE about millions of lurkers to be true)
having seen what you initially claimed.
[Cue Jenny running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]
Nobody ever said that cat food WAS OR WAS NOT for humna
consumption.
The
question at hand is, does klous's
defination
of fast-food include cat food,
and as he admitting
by CHANGING his original defination,
YES, his original
defination
of fast-food included cat food.
On Sun, 28 Dec 2025 16:49:41 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>news:dfroikh3l67pdl8ctqug9uc1rkp729alec@4ax.com...
On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 19:06:52 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
NO IT DOESN'T, THE DICTIONARY'S JOB IS TO DEFINE WORDS, NOT ASSUME >>>>>>>>THAT
PEOPLE ALREADY KNOW THEM.
It assumes people can read English.
WIKIPEDIA SAYS:
Fast food is a type of mass-produced food designed for commercial >>>>>>> resale, with a strong priority placed on speed of service.
It assumes you know it's not talking about commercially manufactured >>>>>>> cat food.
It doesn't say that.
It assumes you know it's not talking about commercially manufactured >>>>> cat food.
No it doesn't.
Yes, it does since only people with a mental illness that makes
them NEED to lie, and/or a profound learning disability, would ever
think cat food could, in any reasonable way, be considered to be for >>>human consumption.
Jenny?
It assumes you DON'T know that, which would be the reason
why your consulting the dictionary in teh
Your LYING, via spelling, is acknowledged.
Jenny?
FIRST place. Dictionary's
Your LYING, via an apostrophe, is acknowledged.
Jenny?
don't
assume that people reading the deifnation's
Your LYING, via spelling and an apostrophe, is acknowledged.
Jenny?
already know what they are.
You LIED and presented that cat food is intended for HUMAN >>>consumption as it is the ONLY way you could claim it is fast food. And >>>you did make that claim, no matter how often you feed your mental >>>illness' NEED for you to lie.
Now, to further feed your NEED to lie, the one you've PROVED you >>>have because of your mental illness, you LIE and claim you didn't.
This, despite that the six or so people who read the group (you're
still free to prove your LIE about millions of lurkers to be true)
having seen what you initially claimed.
[Cue Jenny running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]
Nobody ever said that cat food WAS OR WAS NOT for humna
You did.
On Sun, 28 Dec 2025 16:49:41 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>news:dfroikh3l67pdl8ctqug9uc1rkp729alec@4ax.com...
Yes, it does since only people with a mental illness that makes
them NEED to lie, and/or a profound learning disability, would ever
think cat food could, in any reasonable way, be considered to be for
human consumption.
Nobody ever said that cat food WAS OR WAS NOT for humna consumption.
You claimed it met the definition of fast food.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:50e3lk5htg9umnq54opee2ukr5kk1dog0h@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Sun, 28 Dec 2025 16:49:41 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>news:dfroikh3l67pdl8ctqug9uc1rkp729alec@4ax.com...
Yes, it does since only people with a mental illness that makes
them NEED to lie, and/or a profound learning disability, would ever
think cat food could, in any reasonable way, be considered to be for
human consumption.
Nobody ever said that cat food WAS OR WAS NOT for humna consumption.
You claimed it met the definition of fast food.
No, I did not. I claimed it met YOUR incorrect deifnation of fast-food
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message news:dfroikh3l67pdl8ctqug9uc1rkp729alec@4ax.com...
Yes, it does since only people with a mental illness that makes
them NEED to lie, and/or a profound learning disability, would ever
think cat food could, in any reasonable way, be considered to be for
human consumption.
Nobody ever said that cat food WAS OR WAS NOT for humna consumption. The question at hand is, does klous's defination of fast-food include cat food, and as he admitting by CHANGING his original defination, YES, his original defination of fast-food included cat food.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message news:50e3lk5htg9umnq54opee2ukr5kk1dog0h@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Sun, 28 Dec 2025 16:49:41 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>news:dfroikh3l67pdl8ctqug9uc1rkp729alec@4ax.com...
Yes, it does since only people with a mental illness that makes
them NEED to lie, and/or a profound learning disability, would ever
think cat food could, in any reasonable way, be considered to be for
human consumption.
Nobody ever said that cat food WAS OR WAS NOT for humna consumption.
You claimed it met the definition of fast food.
No, I did not. I claimed it met YOUR incorrect deifnation of fast-food. Which it did. Which YOU CORRECTED.
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.Het> wrote in message >news:4li4lk5ibbq0utpgph6a6okf6gqhtgs8t3@4ax.com...
On Sun, 28 Dec 2025 16:49:41 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>>news:dfroikh3l67pdl8ctqug9uc1rkp729alec@4ax.com...
On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 19:06:52 -0600, "Jerry Sauk" >>>><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
NO IT DOESN'T, THE DICTIONARY'S JOB IS TO DEFINE WORDS, NOT ASSUME THAT
PEOPLE ALREADY KNOW THEM.
It assumes people can read English.
WIKIPEDIA SAYS:
Fast food is a type of mass-produced food designed for commercial >>>>>>>> resale, with a strong priority placed on speed of service.
It assumes you know it's not talking about commercially manufactured >>>>>>>> cat food.
It doesn't say that.
It assumes you know it's not talking about commercially manufactured >>>>>> cat food.
No it doesn't.
Yes, it does since only people with a mental illness that makes >>>>them NEED to lie, and/or a profound learning disability, would ever >>>>think cat food could, in any reasonable way, be considered to be for >>>>human consumption.
Jenny?
It assumes you DON'T know that, which would be the reason
why your consulting the dictionary in teh
Your LYING, via spelling, is acknowledged.
Jenny?
FIRST place. Dictionary's
Your LYING, via an apostrophe, is acknowledged.
Jenny?
don't
assume that people reading the deifnation's
Your LYING, via spelling and an apostrophe, is acknowledged.
Jenny?
already know what they are.
You LIED and presented that cat food is intended for HUMAN >>>>consumption as it is the ONLY way you could claim it is fast food. And >>>>you did make that claim, no matter how often you feed your mental >>>>illness' NEED for you to lie.
Now, to further feed your NEED to lie, the one you've PROVED you >>>>have because of your mental illness, you LIE and claim you didn't. >>>>This, despite that the six or so people who read the group (you're >>>>still free to prove your LIE about millions of lurkers to be true) >>>>having seen what you initially claimed.
[Cue Jenny running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]
Nobody ever said that cat food WAS OR WAS NOT for humna
Your LYING, via spelling, is acknowledged.
consumption.
You did. Or you LIED about the accepted definition including cat
food.
Which is the lie you posted to feed your very real, well
documented NEED to lie?
The
question at hand is, does klous's
Your LYING, via spelling and grammar, is acknowledged.
defination
Your LYING, via spelling, is acknowledged.
of fast-food include cat food,
The ONLY way it can is if you are claiming cat food is intended
for human consumption. No amount of your further feeding your NEED to
lie will change this.
and as he admitting
Your LYING, via grammar, is acknowledged.
by CHANGING his original defination,
Ibid.
YES, his original
defination
Ibid.
of fast-food included cat food.
He took away one means of you feeding your very well documented
NEED to lie. But it opened another, so you must be quite please.
[Cue Jenny running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]
No, I didn't.
But go ahead and provide a mid, if you can.
At Mon, 29 Dec 2025 12:30:52 -0600, "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:50e3lk5htg9umnq54opee2ukr5kk1dog0h@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Sun, 28 Dec 2025 16:49:41 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message
news:dfroikh3l67pdl8ctqug9uc1rkp729alec@4ax.com...
Yes, it does since only people with a mental illness that makes
them NEED to lie, and/or a profound learning disability, would ever
think cat food could, in any reasonable way, be considered to be for
human consumption.
Nobody ever said that cat food WAS OR WAS NOT for humna consumption.
You claimed it met the definition of fast food.
No, I did not. I claimed it met YOUR incorrect deifnation of fast-food.
Which it did. Which YOU CORRECTED.
No, it wasn't "corrected."
It was CHANGED so you would SHUT YOUR PIEHOLE.
Obviously, that DID NOT WORK.
On Tue, 30 Dec 2025 08:38:29 +0000, "Doc Hammerslack" ><dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:
At Mon, 29 Dec 2025 12:30:52 -0600, "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:50e3lk5htg9umnq54opee2ukr5kk1dog0h@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Sun, 28 Dec 2025 16:49:41 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message
news:dfroikh3l67pdl8ctqug9uc1rkp729alec@4ax.com...
Yes, it does since only people with a mental illness that makes
them NEED to lie, and/or a profound learning disability, would ever
think cat food could, in any reasonable way, be considered to be for >>> >>> human consumption.
Nobody ever said that cat food WAS OR WAS NOT for humna consumption.
You claimed it met the definition of fast food.
No, I did not. I claimed it met YOUR incorrect deifnation of fast-food. >>> Which it did. Which YOU CORRECTED.
No, it wasn't "corrected."
It was CHANGED so you would SHUT YOUR PIEHOLE.
Obviously, that DID NOT WORK.
Jenny's NEED to lie and NEED to have his lies exposed means he
can't.
On Tue, 30 Dec 2025 01:17:42 -0800, Kenito Benito <Kenito@Benito.Het>
wrote:
On Tue, 30 Dec 2025 08:38:29 +0000, "Doc Hammerslack" >><dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:
At Mon, 29 Dec 2025 12:30:52 -0600, "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:50e3lk5htg9umnq54opee2ukr5kk1dog0h@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com... >>>> > On Sun, 28 Dec 2025 16:49:41 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in messageYou claimed it met the definition of fast food.
news:dfroikh3l67pdl8ctqug9uc1rkp729alec@4ax.com...
Yes, it does since only people with a mental illness that makes >>>> >>> them NEED to lie, and/or a profound learning disability, would ever >>>> >>> think cat food could, in any reasonable way, be considered to be for >>>> >>> human consumption.
Nobody ever said that cat food WAS OR WAS NOT for humna consumption. >>>> >
No, I did not. I claimed it met YOUR incorrect deifnation of fast-food. >>>> Which it did. Which YOU CORRECTED.
No, it wasn't "corrected."
It was CHANGED so you would SHUT YOUR PIEHOLE.
Obviously, that DID NOT WORK.
Jenny's NEED to lie and NEED to have his lies exposed means he
can't.
At least he admitted that the group's definition is correct, which is >admitting his "definition" is wrong.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 54 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 19:50:32 |
| Calls: | 742 |
| Files: | 1,218 |
| D/L today: |
6 files (8,794K bytes) |
| Messages: | 184,914 |
| Posted today: | 1 |