• Re: "A Rage for Revenge (War Against the Chtorr, Book 3)" by David Gerrold

    From Don@g@crcomp.net to rec.arts.sf.written, alt.fan.heinlein on Tue Dec 2 17:21:08 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.fan.heinlein

    Paul S Person wrote:
    Ted Nolan wrote:
    Christian Weisgerber wrote:
    Paul S Person wrote:

    I would advise skipping this book. The subjects are horrible and not >>>>>for the faint at heart or the squeamish. All of the States in the USA >>>>>except Hawaii have worm infestations with worm huts all over the place. >>>>>Various cults of worm worshipers have sprung up of people actually >>>>>living with the worms and feeding their ... to the worms. There is also >>>>>aberrant sex in the book.

    Sounds like Gerrold all right. Book 4 didn't, by any chance, come out
    after he decided to emulate the later Heinlein, did it?

    I've mostly forgotten the details, but I think the books started
    to veer off a simple "heroic humans fight evil bugs" template and
    the protagonist went through a major self-finding phase.

    The sex can't have been all that interesting or I would remember
    it. ;-) Some body swapping with the telepathy thing, ending up in
    a body of the opposite sex, IIRC?


    It would be hard to outdo _The Man Who Folded Himself_.

    I found that one ... idiotic. I didn't so much get the feeling that
    the main character gradually understood his position as that Gerrold
    only figured it out at the end and then decided to pretend that he had
    known it all along. Note that this is just my impression; Gerrold
    could indeed have had it figured out from the beginning.

    From the sex standpoint, both /Jacob/ and /Moonstar Odyssey/
    (available as /Moonstar: Jobe, Book One/; there is no Book Two; this
    is the first book of a one-book series) rival anything Heinlein did.
    Since it wasn't intrinsically interesting, I soon got bored, driving
    on only on the chance that something worth reading would eventually
    happen. And, in a way, it did. Less so in /Jacob/.

    That said, there was a very Heinleinesque feel to the last book I thought, >>though I can recall very little of it now.

    While I would certainly buy a new Chtorr book, I would much rather have
    a new Steerswoman, an eventuality which seems equally unlikely.

    Idiocy is in the eye of the beholder.

    The 1950-1960s nostalgia implicit in THE MAN WHO FOLDED HIMSELF brings
    to mind REPLAY's fond memories of the 1960-1970s. My mind is nostalgia
    neutral so neither hooks me with "memories, sweetened through the ages
    just like wine."

    Are ALL YOU ZOMBIES and THE MAN WHO FOLDED HIMSELF the sole SF self-sex
    stories tangled in time travel?

    Precedence does not imply provenance.

    Self-sex science fiction was first formulated by RAH. He predictably
    kept his narrative basic and bare bones by using only four time loop characters: Jane, the baby, the unmarried mother, and the bartender.
    Gerrold embellishes by expanding his ensemble of time loop
    characters. Calculating the character count could prove difficult in
    the case of THE MAN WHO FOLDED HIMSELF.

    --
    Don.......My cat's )\._.,--....,'``. veritas _|_ telltale tall tail /, _.. \ _\ (`._ ,. liberabit |
    tells tall tales.. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' vos |

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul S Person@psperson@old.netcom.invalid to rec.arts.sf.written,alt.fan.heinlein on Wed Dec 3 08:38:09 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.fan.heinlein

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 17:21:08 -0000 (UTC), "Don" <g@crcomp.net> wrote:
    Paul S Person wrote:
    <snippo: Sex and Time Travel and /The Man Who Folded Himself/>
    Idiocy is in the eye of the beholder.
    Whatever.
    <snippo>
    Are ALL YOU ZOMBIES and THE MAN WHO FOLDED HIMSELF the sole SF self-sex >stories tangled in time travel?

    Precedence does not imply provenance.

    Self-sex science fiction was first formulated by RAH. He predictably
    kept his narrative basic and bare bones by using only four time loop >characters: Jane, the baby, the unmarried mother, and the bartender.
    Gerrold embellishes by expanding his ensemble of time loop
    characters. Calculating the character count could prove difficult in
    the case of THE MAN WHO FOLDED HIMSELF.
    I believe the precise answer is -- infinite. Possibly uncountable.
    As to "--All You Zombies--", this is a short story, which explains its shortness compared to /The Man Who Folded Himself/, which is a novel.

    It was made into the film /Predestination/, which feels like a good
    Heinlein story done exactly (I've never read the story so cannot say
    how close they are). But, of course, adapting a short story to a film
    is likely to follow the original better (unless, of course, the
    filmmakers decide to go off in their own direction instead of doing
    something so boring as actually telling the same story) than a novel
    because there is enough screen time to include most if not all of the
    short story.
    As to the number of characters, I would say it has essentially /one/.
    Although other characters exist (most prominently the Agency guy).
    That, after all, is the point of the story. Or at least of the film.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Robert Woodward@robertaw@drizzle.com to rec.arts.sf.written,alt.fan.heinlein on Wed Dec 3 09:47:13 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.fan.heinlein

    In article <lto0jk54dgjlvumbg6vd4m6dvnhug26kna@4ax.com>,
    Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 17:21:08 -0000 (UTC), "Don" <g@crcomp.net> wrote:

    Paul S Person wrote:

    <snippo: Sex and Time Travel and /The Man Who Folded Himself/>

    Idiocy is in the eye of the beholder.

    Whatever.

    <snippo>

    Are ALL YOU ZOMBIES and THE MAN WHO FOLDED HIMSELF the sole SF self-sex >stories tangled in time travel?

    Precedence does not imply provenance.

    Self-sex science fiction was first formulated by RAH. He predictably
    kept his narrative basic and bare bones by using only four time loop >characters: Jane, the baby, the unmarried mother, and the bartender.
    Gerrold embellishes by expanding his ensemble of time loop
    characters. Calculating the character count could prove difficult in
    the case of THE MAN WHO FOLDED HIMSELF.

    I believe the precise answer is -- infinite. Possibly uncountable.

    As to "--All You Zombies--", this is a short story, which explains its shortness compared to /The Man Who Folded Himself/, which is a novel.

    It was made into the film /Predestination/, which feels like a good
    Heinlein story done exactly (I've never read the story so cannot say
    how close they are). But, of course, adapting a short story to a film
    is likely to follow the original better (unless, of course, the
    filmmakers decide to go off in their own direction instead of doing
    something so boring as actually telling the same story) than a novel
    because there is enough screen time to include most if not all of the
    short story.

    As to the number of characters, I would say it has essentially /one/. Although other characters exist (most prominently the Agency guy).
    That, after all, is the point of the story. Or at least of the film.

    Agency guy? IIRC, the story, other than scene extras, had only 1
    character (who, because of time travel, shows up twice in many scenes,
    perhaps even thrice once or twice). So is this Agency guy someone the
    script writer added or is it the same character again?
    --
    "We have advanced to new and surprising levels of bafflement."
    Imperial Auditor Miles Vorkosigan describes progress in _Komarr_. -------------------------------------------------------
    Robert Woodward robertaw@drizzle.com
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Don@g@crcomp.net to rec.arts.sf.written,alt.fan.heinlein on Wed Dec 3 17:58:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.fan.heinlein

    Robert Woodward wrote:
    Paul S Person wrote:
    Don wrote:
    Paul S Person wrote:

    <snippo: Sex and Time Travel and /The Man Who Folded Himself/>

    Idiocy is in the eye of the beholder.

    Whatever.

    <snippo>

    Are ALL YOU ZOMBIES and THE MAN WHO FOLDED HIMSELF the sole SF self-sex
    stories tangled in time travel?

    Precedence does not imply provenance.

    Self-sex science fiction was first formulated by RAH. He predictably
    kept his narrative basic and bare bones by using only four time loop
    characters: Jane, the baby, the unmarried mother, and the bartender.
    Gerrold embellishes by expanding his ensemble of time loop
    characters. Calculating the character count could prove difficult in
    the case of THE MAN WHO FOLDED HIMSELF.

    I believe the precise answer is -- infinite. Possibly uncountable.

    As to "--All You Zombies--", this is a short story, which explains its
    shortness compared to /The Man Who Folded Himself/, which is a novel.

    It was made into the film /Predestination/, which feels like a good
    Heinlein story done exactly (I've never read the story so cannot say
    how close they are). But, of course, adapting a short story to a film
    is likely to follow the original better (unless, of course, the
    filmmakers decide to go off in their own direction instead of doing
    something so boring as actually telling the same story) than a novel
    short story.

    As to the number of characters, I would say it has essentially /one/.
    Although other characters exist (most prominently the Agency guy).
    That, after all, is the point of the story. Or at least of the film.

    Agency guy? IIRC, the story, other than scene extras, had only 1
    character (who, because of time travel, shows up twice in many scenes, perhaps even thrice once or twice). So is this Agency guy someone the
    script writer added or is it the same character again?

    Good question. Allow me to clear up character count confusion.

    My "time loop character" is separate and distinct from the narrative's
    one character. Each independent idiosyncratic identity instantiation
    (eg Jane, the baby, the unmarried mother, and the bartender) of the one narrative character counts as one "time loop character."

    --
    Don.......My cat's )\._.,--....,'``. veritas _|_ telltale tall tail /, _.. \ _\ (`._ ,. liberabit |
    tells tall tales.. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' vos |

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul S Person@psperson@old.netcom.invalid to rec.arts.sf.written,alt.fan.heinlein on Thu Dec 4 08:18:29 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.fan.heinlein

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 09:47:13 -0800, Robert Woodward
    <robertaw@drizzle.com> wrote:
    In article <lto0jk54dgjlvumbg6vd4m6dvnhug26kna@4ax.com>,
    Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 17:21:08 -0000 (UTC), "Don" <g@crcomp.net> wrote:

    Paul S Person wrote:

    <snippo: Sex and Time Travel and /The Man Who Folded Himself/>

    Idiocy is in the eye of the beholder.

    Whatever.

    <snippo>

    Are ALL YOU ZOMBIES and THE MAN WHO FOLDED HIMSELF the sole SF self-sex
    stories tangled in time travel?

    Precedence does not imply provenance.

    Self-sex science fiction was first formulated by RAH. He predictably
    kept his narrative basic and bare bones by using only four time loop
    characters: Jane, the baby, the unmarried mother, and the bartender.
    Gerrold embellishes by expanding his ensemble of time loop
    characters. Calculating the character count could prove difficult in
    the case of THE MAN WHO FOLDED HIMSELF.

    I believe the precise answer is -- infinite. Possibly uncountable.

    As to "--All You Zombies--", this is a short story, which explains its
    shortness compared to /The Man Who Folded Himself/, which is a novel.

    It was made into the film /Predestination/, which feels like a good
    Heinlein story done exactly (I've never read the story so cannot say
    how close they are). But, of course, adapting a short story to a film
    is likely to follow the original better (unless, of course, the
    filmmakers decide to go off in their own direction instead of doing
    something so boring as actually telling the same story) than a novel
    because there is enough screen time to include most if not all of the
    short story.

    As to the number of characters, I would say it has essentially /one/.
    Although other characters exist (most prominently the Agency guy).
    That, after all, is the point of the story. Or at least of the film.

    Agency guy? IIRC, the story, other than scene extras, had only 1
    character (who, because of time travel, shows up twice in many scenes, >perhaps even thrice once or twice). So is this Agency guy someone the
    script writer added or is it the same character again?
    That would be Mr. Robinson. He recruits her for Comfort Girl work in
    orbit, and later talks with him a bit (<https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2397535/characters/nm0852965/?ref_=tt_cst_c_3> has examples).
    If that sounds confusing, well, that's time travel!
    Perhaps he replaces exposition done differently in the text with
    exposition done through conversation. As /The Hunger Games/ does: in
    the book, Katniss is a fount of information; in the film, she is told
    some of it because that also tells the audience.
    But to really find out what was changed and how good an adaptation it
    is, you would need to see the movie.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul S Person@psperson@old.netcom.invalid to rec.arts.sf.written,alt.fan.heinlein on Thu Dec 4 08:32:55 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.fan.heinlein

    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 17:58:32 -0000 (UTC), "Don" <g@crcomp.net> wrote:
    Robert Woodward wrote:
    Paul S Person wrote:
    Don wrote:
    Paul S Person wrote:

    <snippo: Sex and Time Travel and /The Man Who Folded Himself/>

    Idiocy is in the eye of the beholder.

    Whatever.

    <snippo>

    Are ALL YOU ZOMBIES and THE MAN WHO FOLDED HIMSELF the sole SF self-sex >>> >stories tangled in time travel?

    Precedence does not imply provenance.

    Self-sex science fiction was first formulated by RAH. He predictably
    kept his narrative basic and bare bones by using only four time loop
    characters: Jane, the baby, the unmarried mother, and the bartender.
    Gerrold embellishes by expanding his ensemble of time loop
    characters. Calculating the character count could prove difficult in
    the case of THE MAN WHO FOLDED HIMSELF.

    I believe the precise answer is -- infinite. Possibly uncountable.

    As to "--All You Zombies--", this is a short story, which explains its
    shortness compared to /The Man Who Folded Himself/, which is a novel.

    It was made into the film /Predestination/, which feels like a good
    Heinlein story done exactly (I've never read the story so cannot say
    how close they are). But, of course, adapting a short story to a film
    is likely to follow the original better (unless, of course, the
    filmmakers decide to go off in their own direction instead of doing
    something so boring as actually telling the same story) than a novel
    short story.

    As to the number of characters, I would say it has essentially /one/.
    Although other characters exist (most prominently the Agency guy).
    That, after all, is the point of the story. Or at least of the film.

    Agency guy? IIRC, the story, other than scene extras, had only 1
    character (who, because of time travel, shows up twice in many scenes,
    perhaps even thrice once or twice). So is this Agency guy someone the
    script writer added or is it the same character again?

    Good question. Allow me to clear up character count confusion.

    My "time loop character" is separate and distinct from the narrative's
    one character. Each independent idiosyncratic identity instantiation
    (eg Jane, the baby, the unmarried mother, and the bartender) of the one >narrative character counts as one "time loop character."
    Since I haven't read the story and since Ethan Hawke's character is
    named "The Bartender" per IMDb, I can only point out that he is /not/
    a bartender in several scenes, but an agent. Not to mention his final incarnation, as it were.
    Interestingly, Sarah Snook's is name "The Unmarried Mother". "Jane"
    does not appear, although the infant does (in time-honored tradition, apparently played by twin infants).
    But it you really want "time loop characters", in the restricted sense
    of being the protagonist, you would need:
    baby Jane
    child Jane (possibly several)
    young adult Jane
    James
    unmarried mother Jane
    agent who gets injured
    agent who recovers
    bartender/agent
    kidnapper agent/retiring agent
    and a mystery guest at the end
    If you want to nominate a few more, feel free.
    Try and avoid the spoiler.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2