On Sat, 28 Feb 2026 13:19:07 -0800, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/28/2026 9:49 AM, dart200 wrote:
In an open society we have a free market economy based on supply and demand. >>
It's up to parents, whether or not to allow their children to have sweet
drinks, not the government's responsibility to dictate.
It is the govt's responsibility to prevent sale of harmful materials.
The color of your kid's socks is up to you. But food choices with
harmful ingredients should not be offered for sale. Because, you, in
your ignorance might think that the harm was simply a matter of
opinion.
On 2/28/2026 4:22 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 2/28/26 1:27 PM, Dude wrote:So, you're thinking a parent giving sweets to their own child is child >abuse?
On 2/28/2026 1:19 PM, Dude wrote:
On 2/28/2026 9:49 AM, dart200 wrote:P.S. Avoid keying your query into the subject line, instead of the
In an open society we have a free market economy based on supply and
demand.
It's up to parents, whether or not to allow their children to have
sweet drinks, not the government's responsibility to dictate.
comment section. It's against internet chat room netiquette to do that
because it interferes with data searching and threaded messaging in
discussions. Thanks.
instead of having a society where we make healthy choices fun and kid
friendly ...
we advertise and sell them addictive junk they can then spend a lifetime
trying to get over
i love how u support child abuse dude
keep up the good work! ???
And, government should step in and prevent parents from giving out any
foods that contain sugar as a sweetener?
An extreme right-wing, authoritarian political ideology characterized by >dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and strong >regimentation of society and the economy.
On Sat, 28 Feb 2026 18:35:54 -0800, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/28/2026 4:22 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 2/28/26 1:27 PM, Dude wrote:So, you're thinking a parent giving sweets to their own child is child
On 2/28/2026 1:19 PM, Dude wrote:
On 2/28/2026 9:49 AM, dart200 wrote:P.S. Avoid keying your query into the subject line, instead of the
In an open society we have a free market economy based on supply and >>>>> demand.
It's up to parents, whether or not to allow their children to have
sweet drinks, not the government's responsibility to dictate.
comment section. It's against internet chat room netiquette to do that >>>> because it interferes with data searching and threaded messaging in
discussions. Thanks.
instead of having a society where we make healthy choices fun and kid
friendly ...
we advertise and sell them addictive junk they can then spend a lifetime >>> trying to get over
i love how u support child abuse dude
keep up the good work! ???
abuse?
And, government should step in and prevent parents from giving out any
foods that contain sugar as a sweetener?
That is not what I said.
What I said was that govts should have the power to prevent sale of
harmful substances. Nothing about strong regimentation of society.
It is right wing thinking to imagine that power to prevent harm equals
strong regimentation of society.
On 2/28/2026 7:10 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2026 18:35:54 -0800, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:Nick said that. See above.
On 2/28/2026 4:22 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 2/28/26 1:27 PM, Dude wrote:So, you're thinking a parent giving sweets to their own child is child
On 2/28/2026 1:19 PM, Dude wrote:
On 2/28/2026 9:49 AM, dart200 wrote:P.S. Avoid keying your query into the subject line, instead of the
In an open society we have a free market economy based on supply and >>>>>> demand.
It's up to parents, whether or not to allow their children to have >>>>>> sweet drinks, not the government's responsibility to dictate.
comment section. It's against internet chat room netiquette to do that >>>>> because it interferes with data searching and threaded messaging in
discussions. Thanks.
instead of having a society where we make healthy choices fun and kid
friendly ...
we advertise and sell them addictive junk they can then spend a lifetime >>>> trying to get over
i love how u support child abuse dude
keep up the good work! ???
abuse?
And, government should step in and prevent parents from giving out any
foods that contain sugar as a sweetener?
That is not what I said.
What I said was that govts should have the power to prevent sale ofSo, I say nobody has the right to tell me what or not I can eat or
harmful substances. Nothing about strong regimentation of society.
drink. It's my body. It's your child. It's your junk. It's your right.
It's not the job of government to tell anyone what they can consume.
It's a free country, or supposed to be.
My final answer.
It is right wing thinking to imagine that power to prevent harm equals
strong regimentation of society.
It is liberal thinking that imagines individuals to have rights to their
own body. That's why it's called libertarian.
On 2/28/2026 2:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2026 13:19:07 -0800, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/28/2026 9:49 AM, dart200 wrote:
In an open society we have a free market economy based on supply and demand.
It's up to parents, whether or not to allow their children to have sweet >>> drinks, not the government's responsibility to dictate.
It is the govt's responsibility to prevent sale of harmful materials.
The color of your kid's socks is up to you. But food choices with
harmful ingredients should not be offered for sale. Because, you, in
your ignorance might think that the harm was simply a matter of
opinion.
Let me start out by saying, that it is not illegal in the US to give
your own child a soft drink.
A parent has the right to choose, based on their own judgement. It isn't
the government's job to dictate what people eat, drink, or not.
That being said, it goes without saying that parents know what's best
for their own children.
Particularly when the government uses fake data and false propaganda to >build a pyramid scheme to indoctrinate young people using social media
in an attempt to turn kids into starting on fad diets and food fetishes.
Just saying.--
On 2/28/2026 9:49 AM, dart200 wrote:
In an open society we have a free market economy based on supply and demand.
It's up to parents, whether or not to allow their children to have sweet >drinks, not the government's responsibility to dictate.
On 2/28/2026 1:19 PM, Dude wrote:
On 2/28/2026 9:49 AM, dart200 wrote:
In an open society we have a free market economy based on supply and
demand.
It's up to parents, whether or not to allow their children to have sweet
drinks, not the government's responsibility to dictate.
P.S. Avoid keying your query into the subject line, instead of the
comment section. It's against internet chat room netiquette to do that >because it interferes with data searching and threaded messaging in >discussions. Thanks.
On Sat, 28 Feb 2026 13:27:46 -0800, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/28/2026 1:19 PM, Dude wrote:
On 2/28/2026 9:49 AM, dart200 wrote:P.S. Avoid keying your query into the subject line, instead of the
>
In an open society we have a free market economy based on supply and
demand.
It's up to parents, whether or not to allow their children to have sweet >>> drinks, not the government's responsibility to dictate.
comment section. It's against internet chat room netiquette to do that
because it interferes with data searching and threaded messaging in
discussions. Thanks.
ok, mama.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 59 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 01:49:07 |
| Calls: | 810 |
| Files: | 1,287 |
| Messages: | 198,761 |