• Re: US Economic Reports

    From dart200@user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic on Sat Jan 3 02:10:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 1/2/26 10:43 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/2/2026 2:18 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 8:30 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Thu, 1 Jan 2026 20:18:34 -0800, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
    On 1/1/26 5:13 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 4:08 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 3:34 PM, Dude wrote:

    In fairness, all the land in the Americas belongs to the native
    inhabitants who were here first. The preferred economic system is
    piracy
    and banditry.

    dude they had some really interesting economic systems which weren't
    that

    Early trade between greenland and europe was fishooks and iron/bronze
    for pelts and tusks.

    yeah no early society maintained subsistence economics based off spot
    trade... that was on top of subsistence economics.

    anyways the Iroquois confederacy had a council of elder women (Clan
    Mothers) who were responsible for selecting (and disposing) of chiefs,
    controlling internal lands/resources, vetoing power of matters for
    war ... whereas the Grand Council (consisting of the male chiefs
    selected by Clan Mothers) actually did the deliberation of peace/war/
    treaties/etc.


    How well did that work out for them in the end?


    was doing pretty well until a bunch of people who supposedly supported property rights went and violently ejected them from their lands

    u literally trying be the case and point EfniEfiA, bro???

    #god
    --
    hi, we are god! let's end war EfOa

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From dart200@user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sat Jan 3 02:11:03 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 1/2/26 10:51 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 7:11 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 2:53 PM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 2:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 8:57 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 4:09 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/31/25 9:53 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/31/2025 12:33 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/30/25 9:45 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/29/2025 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:

    In the long term, commercialism is not sustainable.
    Sure it is.

    i really fucking hate commercials tho,

    Same. The people who make them are apparently mostly idiots.
    There's no other rational explanation for how annoying they are. >>>>>>> Want me to never buy your stuff? Do an annoying intrusive loud
    commercial.

    bro i'm not concerned about the aesthetics of ads, that's merely a >>>>>> superficial concern.

    i'm actually concerned about the misinformation spread by twats
    operating with the motive for personal gain.

    i can't even being the imagine the opportunity cost of having so
    much of lives driven by that nonsense, and we haven't even begun
    to untangle it

    How are you able to perceive that misinformation? What sort of
    majic superpower do you have?!


    have u even remotely looked into the history of advertising???


    Yet you are able to see right through it!

    did i say that??? i'm stuck swimming in it like everyone else is

    That's not new and it's not a revolutionary insight. You're not blessed
    with special powers of perception.

    EVERYONE KNOWS.

    Now what.


    u tell me: ur the one that actually supports this shit show
    --
    hi, i'm nick! let's end war EfOa

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Wilson@Wilson@nowhere.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic on Sat Jan 3 12:49:03 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 1/3/2026 5:10 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/2/26 10:43 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/2/2026 2:18 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 8:30 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Thu, 1 Jan 2026 20:18:34 -0800, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
    On 1/1/26 5:13 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 4:08 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 3:34 PM, Dude wrote:

    In fairness, all the land in the Americas belongs to the native
    inhabitants who were here first. The preferred economic system is >>>>>> piracy
    and banditry.

    dude they had some really interesting economic systems which
    weren't that

    Early trade between greenland and europe was fishooks and iron/bronze
    for pelts and tusks.

    yeah no early society maintained subsistence economics based off spot
    trade... that was on top of subsistence economics.

    anyways the Iroquois confederacy had a council of elder women (Clan
    Mothers) who were responsible for selecting (and disposing) of
    chiefs, controlling internal lands/resources, vetoing power of
    matters for war ... whereas the Grand Council (consisting of the male
    chiefs selected by Clan Mothers) actually did the deliberation of
    peace/war/ treaties/etc.


    How well did that work out for them in the end?


    was doing pretty well until a bunch of people who supposedly supported property rights went and violently ejected them from their lands

    After they chose the side of the French, and lost.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Wilson@Wilson@nowhere.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sat Jan 3 12:54:09 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 1/3/2026 5:11 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/2/26 10:51 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 7:11 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 2:53 PM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 2:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 8:57 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 4:09 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/31/25 9:53 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/31/2025 12:33 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/30/25 9:45 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/29/2025 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:

    In the long term, commercialism is not sustainable.
    Sure it is.

    i really fucking hate commercials tho,

    Same. The people who make them are apparently mostly idiots.
    There's no other rational explanation for how annoying they are. >>>>>>>> Want me to never buy your stuff? Do an annoying intrusive loud >>>>>>>> commercial.

    bro i'm not concerned about the aesthetics of ads, that's merely >>>>>>> a superficial concern.

    i'm actually concerned about the misinformation spread by twats >>>>>>> operating with the motive for personal gain.

    i can't even being the imagine the opportunity cost of having so >>>>>>> much of lives driven by that nonsense, and we haven't even begun >>>>>>> to untangle it

    How are you able to perceive that misinformation? What sort of
    majic superpower do you have?!


    have u even remotely looked into the history of advertising???


    Yet you are able to see right through it!

    did i say that??? i'm stuck swimming in it like everyone else is

    That's not new and it's not a revolutionary insight. You're not
    blessed with special powers of perception.

    EVERYONE KNOWS.

    Now what.


    u tell me: ur the one that actually supports this shit show


    Everyone knows advertising is what it is. "Disinformation" where
    advertisers misstate the quality of their product is already illegal,
    and culturally it's a stupid thing to do. The lost opportunity cost is negligible.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From dart200@user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic on Sat Jan 3 10:47:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 1/3/26 9:49 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/3/2026 5:10 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/2/26 10:43 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/2/2026 2:18 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 8:30 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Thu, 1 Jan 2026 20:18:34 -0800, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
    On 1/1/26 5:13 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 4:08 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 3:34 PM, Dude wrote:

    In fairness, all the land in the Americas belongs to the native
    inhabitants who were here first. The preferred economic system is >>>>>>> piracy
    and banditry.

    dude they had some really interesting economic systems which
    weren't that

    Early trade between greenland and europe was fishooks and iron/bronze >>>>> for pelts and tusks.

    yeah no early society maintained subsistence economics based off
    spot trade... that was on top of subsistence economics.

    anyways the Iroquois confederacy had a council of elder women (Clan
    Mothers) who were responsible for selecting (and disposing) of
    chiefs, controlling internal lands/resources, vetoing power of
    matters for war ... whereas the Grand Council (consisting of the
    male chiefs selected by Clan Mothers) actually did the deliberation
    of peace/war/ treaties/etc.


    How well did that work out for them in the end?


    was doing pretty well until a bunch of people who supposedly supported
    property rights went and violently ejected them from their lands

    After they chose the side of the French, and lost.

    *british retard,

    ...and that happened largely due to "property rights supporters" already encroaching on their lands...

    which they were then punished for defending by supposed "property rights supporters"

    wow such voluntarism

    #god
    --
    hi, we are god! let's end war EfOa

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From dart200@user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic,sci.skeptic,alt.conspiracy on Sat Jan 3 10:59:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 1/3/26 9:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/3/2026 5:11 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/2/26 10:51 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 7:11 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 2:53 PM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 2:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 8:57 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 4:09 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/31/25 9:53 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/31/2025 12:33 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/30/25 9:45 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/29/2025 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:

    In the long term, commercialism is not sustainable.
    Sure it is.

    i really fucking hate commercials tho,

    Same. The people who make them are apparently mostly idiots. >>>>>>>>> There's no other rational explanation for how annoying they >>>>>>>>> are. Want me to never buy your stuff? Do an annoying intrusive >>>>>>>>> loud commercial.

    bro i'm not concerned about the aesthetics of ads, that's merely >>>>>>>> a superficial concern.

    i'm actually concerned about the misinformation spread by twats >>>>>>>> operating with the motive for personal gain.

    i can't even being the imagine the opportunity cost of having so >>>>>>>> much of lives driven by that nonsense, and we haven't even begun >>>>>>>> to untangle it

    How are you able to perceive that misinformation? What sort of
    majic superpower do you have?!


    have u even remotely looked into the history of advertising???


    Yet you are able to see right through it!

    did i say that??? i'm stuck swimming in it like everyone else is

    That's not new and it's not a revolutionary insight. You're not
    blessed with special powers of perception.

    EVERYONE KNOWS.

    Now what.


    u tell me: ur the one that actually supports this shit show


    Everyone knows advertising is what it is. "Disinformation" where

    they really don't,

    for example: we spent literally decades talking about how fats were some ultimate cause of obesity when that really was just marketing by big
    sugar that worked its way into actual scientific literature ...

    i mean how long did it take for doctors to stop recommending cigarettes
    for things???

    oh my god, even the whole concept of muh "chemical imbalance" causing
    mental illness is actually just a fucking marketing strategy ... that
    one is still going strong.

    hahah. oh jeez the entire debate over global warming has been
    manufactured by big oil, LOL

    same for nuclear tbh.

    i mean, did you know the entire concept of an "american breakfast" is basically just a giant marketing scheme???

    the list goes on ... and ofc many of these will be *controversial*, and
    that's the nature of lies enshrining themselves into the collective consciousness

    advertisers misstate the quality of their product is already illegal,
    and culturally it's a stupid thing to do. The lost opportunity cost is negligible.


    you are just a fucking superficial retard wilson completely blind to all
    the mistruths enslaving you to utter idiocracy without an inkling of ur awareness.

    my god all the fucking stupid shit subethical retards end up believing
    into, the karma is just too goddamn sweet ...

    we just want out the lies, bruh

    #god
    --
    hi, we are god! let's end war EfOa

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sat Jan 3 14:27:04 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Sat, 3 Jan 2026 10:59:43 -0800, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    On 1/3/26 9:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/3/2026 5:11 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/2/26 10:51 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 7:11 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 2:53 PM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 2:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 8:57 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 4:09 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/31/25 9:53 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/31/2025 12:33 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/30/25 9:45 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/29/2025 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:

    In the long term, commercialism is not sustainable.
    Sure it is.

    i really fucking hate commercials tho,

    Same. The people who make them are apparently mostly idiots. >>>>>>>>>> There's no other rational explanation for how annoying they >>>>>>>>>> are. Want me to never buy your stuff? Do an annoying intrusive >>>>>>>>>> loud commercial.

    bro i'm not concerned about the aesthetics of ads, that's merely >>>>>>>>> a superficial concern.

    i'm actually concerned about the misinformation spread by twats >>>>>>>>> operating with the motive for personal gain.

    i can't even being the imagine the opportunity cost of having so >>>>>>>>> much of lives driven by that nonsense, and we haven't even begun >>>>>>>>> to untangle it

    How are you able to perceive that misinformation? What sort of >>>>>>>> majic superpower do you have?!


    have u even remotely looked into the history of advertising???


    Yet you are able to see right through it!

    did i say that??? i'm stuck swimming in it like everyone else is

    That's not new and it's not a revolutionary insight. You're not
    blessed with special powers of perception.

    EVERYONE KNOWS.

    Now what.


    u tell me: ur the one that actually supports this shit show


    Everyone knows advertising is what it is. "Disinformation" where

    they really don't,

    for example: we spent literally decades talking about how fats were some >ultimate cause of obesity when that really was just marketing by big
    sugar that worked its way into actual scientific literature ...

    i mean how long did it take for doctors to stop recommending cigarettes
    for things???

    oh my god, even the whole concept of muh "chemical imbalance" causing
    mental illness is actually just a fucking marketing strategy ... that
    one is still going strong.

    hahah. oh jeez the entire debate over global warming has been
    manufactured by big oil, LOL

    same for nuclear tbh.

    i mean, did you know the entire concept of an "american breakfast" is >basically just a giant marketing scheme???

    the list goes on ... and ofc many of these will be *controversial*, and >that's the nature of lies enshrining themselves into the collective >consciousness

    advertisers misstate the quality of their product is already illegal,
    and culturally it's a stupid thing to do. The lost opportunity cost is
    negligible.


    you are just a fucking superficial retard wilson completely blind to all
    the mistruths enslaving you to utter idiocracy without an inkling of ur >awareness.

    retard provides him an excuse. He can't help it.

    Oh, yes he can, and his is aware of what he does.

    He is merely trying to repeat his lies often enough that they become
    the truth. That might even work in the long term.

    my god all the fucking stupid shit subethical retards end up believing
    into, the karma is just too goddamn sweet ...

    we just want out the lies, bruh

    #god
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Wilson@Wilson@nowhere.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic,sci.skeptic,alt.conspiracy on Sat Jan 3 14:54:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 1/3/2026 1:59 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/3/26 9:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/3/2026 5:11 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/2/26 10:51 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 7:11 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 2:53 PM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 2:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 8:57 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 4:09 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/31/25 9:53 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/31/2025 12:33 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/30/25 9:45 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/29/2025 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:

    In the long term, commercialism is not sustainable.
    Sure it is.

    i really fucking hate commercials tho,

    Same. The people who make them are apparently mostly idiots. >>>>>>>>>> There's no other rational explanation for how annoying they >>>>>>>>>> are. Want me to never buy your stuff? Do an annoying intrusive >>>>>>>>>> loud commercial.

    bro i'm not concerned about the aesthetics of ads, that's
    merely a superficial concern.

    i'm actually concerned about the misinformation spread by twats >>>>>>>>> operating with the motive for personal gain.

    i can't even being the imagine the opportunity cost of having >>>>>>>>> so much of lives driven by that nonsense, and we haven't even >>>>>>>>> begun to untangle it

    How are you able to perceive that misinformation? What sort of >>>>>>>> majic superpower do you have?!


    have u even remotely looked into the history of advertising???


    Yet you are able to see right through it!

    did i say that??? i'm stuck swimming in it like everyone else is

    That's not new and it's not a revolutionary insight. You're not
    blessed with special powers of perception.

    EVERYONE KNOWS.

    Now what.


    u tell me: ur the one that actually supports this shit show


    Everyone knows advertising is what it is. "Disinformation" where

    they really don't,

    for example: we spent literally decades talking about how fats were some ultimate cause of obesity when that really was just marketing by big
    sugar that worked its way into actual scientific literature ...

    i mean how long did it take for doctors to stop recommending cigarettes
    for things???

    oh my god, even the whole concept of muh "chemical imbalance" causing
    mental illness is actually just a fucking marketing strategy ... that
    one is still going strong.

    hahah. oh jeez the entire debate over global warming has been
    manufactured by big oil, LOL

    same for nuclear tbh.

    i mean, did you know the entire concept of an "american breakfast" is basically just a giant marketing scheme???

    the list goes on ... and ofc many of these will be *controversial*, and that's the nature of lies enshrining themselves into the collective consciousness

    advertisers misstate the quality of their product is already illegal,
    and culturally it's a stupid thing to do. The lost opportunity cost is
    negligible.


    you are just a fucking superficial retard wilson completely blind to all
    the mistruths enslaving you to utter idiocracy without an inkling of ur awareness.

    my god all the fucking stupid shit subethical retards end up believing
    into, the karma is just too goddamn sweet ...

    we just want out the lies, bruh

    #god


    But I *know* about all of those things. And I'm not anything special.
    Most people above midwit do as well.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Wilson@Wilson@nowhere.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sat Jan 3 14:55:38 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 1/3/2026 2:27 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 3 Jan 2026 10:59:43 -0800, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    On 1/3/26 9:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/3/2026 5:11 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/2/26 10:51 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 7:11 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 2:53 PM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 2:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 8:57 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 4:09 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/31/25 9:53 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/31/2025 12:33 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/30/25 9:45 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/29/2025 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:

    In the long term, commercialism is not sustainable. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure it is.

    i really fucking hate commercials tho,

    Same. The people who make them are apparently mostly idiots. >>>>>>>>>>> There's no other rational explanation for how annoying they >>>>>>>>>>> are. Want me to never buy your stuff? Do an annoying intrusive >>>>>>>>>>> loud commercial.

    bro i'm not concerned about the aesthetics of ads, that's merely >>>>>>>>>> a superficial concern.

    i'm actually concerned about the misinformation spread by twats >>>>>>>>>> operating with the motive for personal gain.

    i can't even being the imagine the opportunity cost of having so >>>>>>>>>> much of lives driven by that nonsense, and we haven't even begun >>>>>>>>>> to untangle it

    How are you able to perceive that misinformation? What sort of >>>>>>>>> majic superpower do you have?!


    have u even remotely looked into the history of advertising??? >>>>>>>>

    Yet you are able to see right through it!

    did i say that??? i'm stuck swimming in it like everyone else is

    That's not new and it's not a revolutionary insight. You're not
    blessed with special powers of perception.

    EVERYONE KNOWS.

    Now what.


    u tell me: ur the one that actually supports this shit show


    Everyone knows advertising is what it is. "Disinformation" where

    they really don't,

    for example: we spent literally decades talking about how fats were some
    ultimate cause of obesity when that really was just marketing by big
    sugar that worked its way into actual scientific literature ...

    i mean how long did it take for doctors to stop recommending cigarettes
    for things???

    oh my god, even the whole concept of muh "chemical imbalance" causing
    mental illness is actually just a fucking marketing strategy ... that
    one is still going strong.

    hahah. oh jeez the entire debate over global warming has been
    manufactured by big oil, LOL

    same for nuclear tbh.

    i mean, did you know the entire concept of an "american breakfast" is
    basically just a giant marketing scheme???

    the list goes on ... and ofc many of these will be *controversial*, and
    that's the nature of lies enshrining themselves into the collective
    consciousness

    advertisers misstate the quality of their product is already illegal,
    and culturally it's a stupid thing to do. The lost opportunity cost is
    negligible.


    you are just a fucking superficial retard wilson completely blind to all
    the mistruths enslaving you to utter idiocracy without an inkling of ur
    awareness.

    retard provides him an excuse. He can't help it.

    Oh, yes he can, and his is aware of what he does.

    He is merely trying to repeat his lies often enough that they become
    the truth. That might even work in the long term.

    Oh fuck off Noah. Anything you disagree with is a "lie".

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From dart200@user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic,sci.skeptic,alt.conspiracy on Sat Jan 3 12:08:09 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 1/3/26 11:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/3/2026 1:59 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/3/26 9:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/3/2026 5:11 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/2/26 10:51 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 7:11 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 2:53 PM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 2:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 8:57 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 4:09 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/31/25 9:53 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/31/2025 12:33 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/30/25 9:45 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/29/2025 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:

    In the long term, commercialism is not sustainable. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure it is.

    i really fucking hate commercials tho,

    Same. The people who make them are apparently mostly idiots. >>>>>>>>>>> There's no other rational explanation for how annoying they >>>>>>>>>>> are. Want me to never buy your stuff? Do an annoying
    intrusive loud commercial.

    bro i'm not concerned about the aesthetics of ads, that's >>>>>>>>>> merely a superficial concern.

    i'm actually concerned about the misinformation spread by >>>>>>>>>> twats operating with the motive for personal gain.

    i can't even being the imagine the opportunity cost of having >>>>>>>>>> so much of lives driven by that nonsense, and we haven't even >>>>>>>>>> begun to untangle it

    How are you able to perceive that misinformation? What sort of >>>>>>>>> majic superpower do you have?!


    have u even remotely looked into the history of advertising??? >>>>>>>>

    Yet you are able to see right through it!

    did i say that??? i'm stuck swimming in it like everyone else is

    That's not new and it's not a revolutionary insight. You're not
    blessed with special powers of perception.

    EVERYONE KNOWS.

    Now what.


    u tell me: ur the one that actually supports this shit show


    Everyone knows advertising is what it is. "Disinformation" where

    they really don't,

    for example: we spent literally decades talking about how fats were
    some ultimate cause of obesity when that really was just marketing by
    big sugar that worked its way into actual scientific literature ...

    i mean how long did it take for doctors to stop recommending
    cigarettes for things???

    oh my god, even the whole concept of muh "chemical imbalance" causing
    mental illness is actually just a fucking marketing strategy ... that
    one is still going strong.

    hahah. oh jeez the entire debate over global warming has been
    manufactured by big oil, LOL

    same for nuclear tbh.

    i mean, did you know the entire concept of an "american breakfast" is
    basically just a giant marketing scheme???

    the list goes on ... and ofc many of these will be *controversial*,
    and that's the nature of lies enshrining themselves into the
    collective consciousness

    advertisers misstate the quality of their product is already illegal,
    and culturally it's a stupid thing to do. The lost opportunity cost
    is negligible.


    you are just a fucking superficial retard wilson completely blind to
    all the mistruths enslaving you to utter idiocracy without an inkling
    of ur awareness.

    my god all the fucking stupid shit subethical retards end up believing
    into, the karma is just too goddamn sweet ...

    we just want out the lies, bruh

    #god


    But I *know* about all of those things. And I'm not anything special.
    Most people above midwit do as well.


    lol, aren't you a resident global warming objector?? so clearly not

    and the problem is all the ones you *dont* know about
    --
    hi, i'm nick! let's end war EfOa

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sat Jan 3 17:13:50 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Sat, 3 Jan 2026 14:55:38 -0500, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 1/3/2026 2:27 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 3 Jan 2026 10:59:43 -0800, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    On 1/3/26 9:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/3/2026 5:11 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/2/26 10:51 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 7:11 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 2:53 PM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 2:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 8:57 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 4:09 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/31/25 9:53 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/31/2025 12:33 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/30/25 9:45 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/29/2025 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:

    In the long term, commercialism is not sustainable. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure it is.

    i really fucking hate commercials tho,

    Same. The people who make them are apparently mostly idiots. >>>>>>>>>>>> There's no other rational explanation for how annoying they >>>>>>>>>>>> are. Want me to never buy your stuff? Do an annoying intrusive >>>>>>>>>>>> loud commercial.

    bro i'm not concerned about the aesthetics of ads, that's merely >>>>>>>>>>> a superficial concern.

    i'm actually concerned about the misinformation spread by twats >>>>>>>>>>> operating with the motive for personal gain.

    i can't even being the imagine the opportunity cost of having so >>>>>>>>>>> much of lives driven by that nonsense, and we haven't even begun >>>>>>>>>>> to untangle it

    How are you able to perceive that misinformation? What sort of >>>>>>>>>> majic superpower do you have?!


    have u even remotely looked into the history of advertising??? >>>>>>>>>

    Yet you are able to see right through it!

    did i say that??? i'm stuck swimming in it like everyone else is

    That's not new and it's not a revolutionary insight. You're not
    blessed with special powers of perception.

    EVERYONE KNOWS.

    Now what.


    u tell me: ur the one that actually supports this shit show


    Everyone knows advertising is what it is. "Disinformation" where

    they really don't,

    for example: we spent literally decades talking about how fats were some >>> ultimate cause of obesity when that really was just marketing by big
    sugar that worked its way into actual scientific literature ...

    i mean how long did it take for doctors to stop recommending cigarettes
    for things???

    oh my god, even the whole concept of muh "chemical imbalance" causing
    mental illness is actually just a fucking marketing strategy ... that
    one is still going strong.

    hahah. oh jeez the entire debate over global warming has been
    manufactured by big oil, LOL

    same for nuclear tbh.

    i mean, did you know the entire concept of an "american breakfast" is
    basically just a giant marketing scheme???

    the list goes on ... and ofc many of these will be *controversial*, and
    that's the nature of lies enshrining themselves into the collective
    consciousness

    advertisers misstate the quality of their product is already illegal,
    and culturally it's a stupid thing to do. The lost opportunity cost is >>>> negligible.


    you are just a fucking superficial retard wilson completely blind to all >>> the mistruths enslaving you to utter idiocracy without an inkling of ur
    awareness.

    retard provides him an excuse. He can't help it.

    Oh, yes he can, and his is aware of what he does.

    He is merely trying to repeat his lies often enough that they become
    the truth. That might even work in the long term.

    Oh fuck off Noah. Anything you disagree with is a "lie".

    But not retarded. Anything I disagree with? No, people, including
    me, can be mistaken or even mislead. But when confronting a career
    misleader, I don't take prisoners.
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sat Jan 3 17:17:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Sat, 3 Jan 2026 14:54:51 -0500, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 1/3/2026 1:59 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/3/26 9:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/3/2026 5:11 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/2/26 10:51 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 7:11 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 2:53 PM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 2:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 8:57 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 4:09 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/31/25 9:53 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/31/2025 12:33 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/30/25 9:45 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/29/2025 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:

    In the long term, commercialism is not sustainable. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure it is.

    i really fucking hate commercials tho,

    Same. The people who make them are apparently mostly idiots. >>>>>>>>>>> There's no other rational explanation for how annoying they >>>>>>>>>>> are. Want me to never buy your stuff? Do an annoying intrusive >>>>>>>>>>> loud commercial.

    bro i'm not concerned about the aesthetics of ads, that's >>>>>>>>>> merely a superficial concern.

    i'm actually concerned about the misinformation spread by twats >>>>>>>>>> operating with the motive for personal gain.

    i can't even being the imagine the opportunity cost of having >>>>>>>>>> so much of lives driven by that nonsense, and we haven't even >>>>>>>>>> begun to untangle it

    How are you able to perceive that misinformation? What sort of >>>>>>>>> majic superpower do you have?!


    have u even remotely looked into the history of advertising??? >>>>>>>>

    Yet you are able to see right through it!

    did i say that??? i'm stuck swimming in it like everyone else is

    That's not new and it's not a revolutionary insight. You're not
    blessed with special powers of perception.

    EVERYONE KNOWS.

    Now what.


    u tell me: ur the one that actually supports this shit show


    Everyone knows advertising is what it is. "Disinformation" where

    they really don't,

    for example: we spent literally decades talking about how fats were some
    ultimate cause of obesity when that really was just marketing by big
    sugar that worked its way into actual scientific literature ...

    i mean how long did it take for doctors to stop recommending cigarettes
    for things???

    oh my god, even the whole concept of muh "chemical imbalance" causing
    mental illness is actually just a fucking marketing strategy ... that
    one is still going strong.

    hahah. oh jeez the entire debate over global warming has been
    manufactured by big oil, LOL

    same for nuclear tbh.

    i mean, did you know the entire concept of an "american breakfast" is
    basically just a giant marketing scheme???

    the list goes on ... and ofc many of these will be *controversial*, and
    that's the nature of lies enshrining themselves into the collective
    consciousness

    advertisers misstate the quality of their product is already illegal,
    and culturally it's a stupid thing to do. The lost opportunity cost is
    negligible.


    you are just a fucking superficial retard wilson completely blind to all
    the mistruths enslaving you to utter idiocracy without an inkling of ur
    awareness.

    my god all the fucking stupid shit subethical retards end up believing
    into, the karma is just too goddamn sweet ...

    we just want out the lies, bruh

    #god


    But I *know* about all of those things. And I'm not anything special.
    Most people above midwit do as well.

    Here wilson is allowed to be a little retarded. He thinks that most
    people above the stupid level agree with him.
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dude@punditster@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun Jan 4 21:39:09 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 1/3/2026 11:55 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/3/2026 2:27 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 3 Jan 2026 10:59:43 -0800, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    On 1/3/26 9:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/3/2026 5:11 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/2/26 10:51 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 7:11 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 2:53 PM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 2:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 8:57 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 4:09 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/31/25 9:53 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/31/2025 12:33 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/30/25 9:45 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/29/2025 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:

    In the long term, commercialism is not sustainable. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure it is.

    i really fucking hate commercials tho,

    Same. The people who make them are apparently mostly idiots. >>>>>>>>>>>> There's no other rational explanation for how annoying they >>>>>>>>>>>> are. Want me to never buy your stuff? Do an annoying intrusive >>>>>>>>>>>> loud commercial.

    bro i'm not concerned about the aesthetics of ads, that's merely >>>>>>>>>>> a superficial concern.

    i'm actually concerned about the misinformation spread by twats >>>>>>>>>>> operating with the motive for personal gain.

    i can't even being the imagine the opportunity cost of having so >>>>>>>>>>> much of lives driven by that nonsense, and we haven't even begun >>>>>>>>>>> to untangle it

    How are you able to perceive that misinformation? What sort of >>>>>>>>>> majic superpower do you have?!


    have u even remotely looked into the history of advertising??? >>>>>>>>>

    Yet you are able to see right through it!

    did i say that??? i'm stuck swimming in it like everyone else is

    That's not new and it's not a revolutionary insight. You're not
    blessed with special powers of perception.

    EVERYONE KNOWS.

    Now what.


    u tell me: ur the one that actually supports this shit show


    Everyone knows advertising is what it is. "Disinformation" where

    they really don't,

    for example: we spent literally decades talking about how fats were some >>> ultimate cause of obesity when that really was just marketing by big
    sugar that worked its way into actual scientific literature ...

    i mean how long did it take for doctors to stop recommending cigarettes
    for things???

    oh my god, even the whole concept of muh "chemical imbalance" causing
    mental illness is actually just a fucking marketing strategy ... that
    one is still going strong.

    hahah. oh jeez the entire debate over global warming has been
    manufactured by big oil, LOL

    same for nuclear tbh.

    i mean, did you know the entire concept of an "american breakfast" is
    basically just a giant marketing scheme???

    the list goes on ... and ofc many of these will be *controversial*, and
    that's the nature of lies enshrining themselves into the collective
    consciousness

    advertisers misstate the quality of their product is already illegal,
    and culturally it's a stupid thing to do. The lost opportunity cost is >>>> negligible.


    you are just a fucking superficial retard wilson completely blind to all >>> the mistruths enslaving you to utter idiocracy without an inkling of ur
    awareness.

    retard provides him an excuse.-a He can't help it.

    Oh, yes he can, and his is aware of what he does.

    He is merely trying to repeat his lies often enough that they become
    the truth.-a That might even work in the long term.

    Oh fuck off Noah. Anything you disagree with is a "lie".

    That's one way to win a debate - just call your opponent a liar.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dude@punditster@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun Jan 4 21:52:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 1/3/2026 2:17 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 3 Jan 2026 14:54:51 -0500, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 1/3/2026 1:59 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/3/26 9:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/3/2026 5:11 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/2/26 10:51 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 7:11 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 2:53 PM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 2:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 8:57 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 4:09 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/31/25 9:53 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/31/2025 12:33 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/30/25 9:45 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/29/2025 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:

    In the long term, commercialism is not sustainable. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure it is.

    i really fucking hate commercials tho,

    Same. The people who make them are apparently mostly idiots. >>>>>>>>>>>> There's no other rational explanation for how annoying they >>>>>>>>>>>> are. Want me to never buy your stuff? Do an annoying intrusive >>>>>>>>>>>> loud commercial.

    bro i'm not concerned about the aesthetics of ads, that's >>>>>>>>>>> merely a superficial concern.

    i'm actually concerned about the misinformation spread by twats >>>>>>>>>>> operating with the motive for personal gain.

    i can't even being the imagine the opportunity cost of having >>>>>>>>>>> so much of lives driven by that nonsense, and we haven't even >>>>>>>>>>> begun to untangle it

    How are you able to perceive that misinformation? What sort of >>>>>>>>>> majic superpower do you have?!


    have u even remotely looked into the history of advertising??? >>>>>>>>>

    Yet you are able to see right through it!

    did i say that??? i'm stuck swimming in it like everyone else is

    That's not new and it's not a revolutionary insight. You're not
    blessed with special powers of perception.

    EVERYONE KNOWS.

    Now what.


    u tell me: ur the one that actually supports this shit show


    Everyone knows advertising is what it is. "Disinformation" where

    they really don't,

    for example: we spent literally decades talking about how fats were some >>> ultimate cause of obesity when that really was just marketing by big
    sugar that worked its way into actual scientific literature ...

    i mean how long did it take for doctors to stop recommending cigarettes
    for things???

    oh my god, even the whole concept of muh "chemical imbalance" causing
    mental illness is actually just a fucking marketing strategy ... that
    one is still going strong.

    hahah. oh jeez the entire debate over global warming has been
    manufactured by big oil, LOL

    same for nuclear tbh.

    i mean, did you know the entire concept of an "american breakfast" is
    basically just a giant marketing scheme???

    the list goes on ... and ofc many of these will be *controversial*, and
    that's the nature of lies enshrining themselves into the collective
    consciousness

    advertisers misstate the quality of their product is already illegal,
    and culturally it's a stupid thing to do. The lost opportunity cost is >>>> negligible.


    you are just a fucking superficial retard wilson completely blind to all >>> the mistruths enslaving you to utter idiocracy without an inkling of ur
    awareness.

    my god all the fucking stupid shit subethical retards end up believing
    into, the karma is just too goddamn sweet ...

    > we just want out the lies, bruh
    >
    > #god


    But I *know* about all of those things. And I'm not anything special.
    Most people above midwit do as well.

    Here wilson is allowed to be a little retarded. He thinks that most
    people above the stupid level agree with him.

    On the other hand, Nick and Noah seem to think there is a conspiracy to control everyone with subconscious mind control through advertising.

    You can't make this stuff up!

    They are apparently helpless and the high volume on TV commercials is a
    trap to imprint on their minds a trance induction state.

    Manchurian candidates?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Mon Jan 5 09:58:32 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Sun, 4 Jan 2026 21:39:09 -0800, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/3/2026 11:55 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/3/2026 2:27 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 3 Jan 2026 10:59:43 -0800, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    On 1/3/26 9:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/3/2026 5:11 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/2/26 10:51 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 7:11 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 2:53 PM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 2:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 8:57 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 4:09 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/31/25 9:53 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/31/2025 12:33 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/30/25 9:45 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/29/2025 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:

    In the long term, commercialism is not sustainable. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure it is.

    i really fucking hate commercials tho,

    Same. The people who make them are apparently mostly idiots. >>>>>>>>>>>>> There's no other rational explanation for how annoying they >>>>>>>>>>>>> are. Want me to never buy your stuff? Do an annoying intrusive >>>>>>>>>>>>> loud commercial.

    bro i'm not concerned about the aesthetics of ads, that's merely >>>>>>>>>>>> a superficial concern.

    i'm actually concerned about the misinformation spread by twats >>>>>>>>>>>> operating with the motive for personal gain.

    i can't even being the imagine the opportunity cost of having so >>>>>>>>>>>> much of lives driven by that nonsense, and we haven't even begun >>>>>>>>>>>> to untangle it

    How are you able to perceive that misinformation? What sort of >>>>>>>>>>> majic superpower do you have?!


    have u even remotely looked into the history of advertising??? >>>>>>>>>>

    Yet you are able to see right through it!

    did i say that??? i'm stuck swimming in it like everyone else is >>>>>>>
    That's not new and it's not a revolutionary insight. You're not
    blessed with special powers of perception.

    EVERYONE KNOWS.

    Now what.


    u tell me: ur the one that actually supports this shit show


    Everyone knows advertising is what it is. "Disinformation" where

    they really don't,

    for example: we spent literally decades talking about how fats were some >>>> ultimate cause of obesity when that really was just marketing by big
    sugar that worked its way into actual scientific literature ...

    i mean how long did it take for doctors to stop recommending cigarettes >>>> for things???

    oh my god, even the whole concept of muh "chemical imbalance" causing
    mental illness is actually just a fucking marketing strategy ... that
    one is still going strong.

    hahah. oh jeez the entire debate over global warming has been
    manufactured by big oil, LOL

    same for nuclear tbh.

    i mean, did you know the entire concept of an "american breakfast" is
    basically just a giant marketing scheme???

    the list goes on ... and ofc many of these will be *controversial*, and >>>> that's the nature of lies enshrining themselves into the collective
    consciousness

    advertisers misstate the quality of their product is already illegal, >>>>> and culturally it's a stupid thing to do. The lost opportunity cost is >>>>> negligible.


    you are just a fucking superficial retard wilson completely blind to all >>>> the mistruths enslaving you to utter idiocracy without an inkling of ur >>>> awareness.

    retard provides him an excuse.a He can't help it.

    Oh, yes he can, and his is aware of what he does.

    He is merely trying to repeat his lies often enough that they become
    the truth.a That might even work in the long term.

    Oh fuck off Noah. Anything you disagree with is a "lie".

    That's one way to win a debate - just call your opponent a liar.

    Nobody wins arguments around here.
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Mon Jan 5 10:02:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Sun, 4 Jan 2026 21:52:48 -0800, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/3/2026 2:17 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 3 Jan 2026 14:54:51 -0500, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 1/3/2026 1:59 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/3/26 9:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/3/2026 5:11 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/2/26 10:51 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 7:11 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 2:53 PM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 2:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 8:57 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 4:09 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/31/25 9:53 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/31/2025 12:33 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/30/25 9:45 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/29/2025 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:

    In the long term, commercialism is not sustainable. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure it is.

    i really fucking hate commercials tho,

    Same. The people who make them are apparently mostly idiots. >>>>>>>>>>>>> There's no other rational explanation for how annoying they >>>>>>>>>>>>> are. Want me to never buy your stuff? Do an annoying intrusive >>>>>>>>>>>>> loud commercial.

    bro i'm not concerned about the aesthetics of ads, that's >>>>>>>>>>>> merely a superficial concern.

    i'm actually concerned about the misinformation spread by twats >>>>>>>>>>>> operating with the motive for personal gain.

    i can't even being the imagine the opportunity cost of having >>>>>>>>>>>> so much of lives driven by that nonsense, and we haven't even >>>>>>>>>>>> begun to untangle it

    How are you able to perceive that misinformation? What sort of >>>>>>>>>>> majic superpower do you have?!


    have u even remotely looked into the history of advertising??? >>>>>>>>>>

    Yet you are able to see right through it!

    did i say that??? i'm stuck swimming in it like everyone else is >>>>>>>
    That's not new and it's not a revolutionary insight. You're not
    blessed with special powers of perception.

    EVERYONE KNOWS.

    Now what.


    u tell me: ur the one that actually supports this shit show


    Everyone knows advertising is what it is. "Disinformation" where

    they really don't,

    for example: we spent literally decades talking about how fats were some >>>> ultimate cause of obesity when that really was just marketing by big
    sugar that worked its way into actual scientific literature ...

    i mean how long did it take for doctors to stop recommending cigarettes >>>> for things???

    oh my god, even the whole concept of muh "chemical imbalance" causing
    mental illness is actually just a fucking marketing strategy ... that
    one is still going strong.

    hahah. oh jeez the entire debate over global warming has been
    manufactured by big oil, LOL

    same for nuclear tbh.

    i mean, did you know the entire concept of an "american breakfast" is
    basically just a giant marketing scheme???

    the list goes on ... and ofc many of these will be *controversial*, and >>>> that's the nature of lies enshrining themselves into the collective
    consciousness

    advertisers misstate the quality of their product is already illegal, >>>>> and culturally it's a stupid thing to do. The lost opportunity cost is >>>>> negligible.


    you are just a fucking superficial retard wilson completely blind to all >>>> the mistruths enslaving you to utter idiocracy without an inkling of ur >>>> awareness.

    my god all the fucking stupid shit subethical retards end up believing >>>> into, the karma is just too goddamn sweet ...

    > we just want out the lies, bruh
    >
    > #god


    But I *know* about all of those things. And I'm not anything special.
    Most people above midwit do as well.

    Here wilson is allowed to be a little retarded. He thinks that most
    people above the stupid level agree with him.

    On the other hand, Nick and Noah seem to think there is a conspiracy to >control everyone with subconscious mind control through advertising.

    Not a conspiracy.

    You can't make this stuff up!

    They are apparently helpless and the high volume on TV commercials is a
    trap to imprint on their minds a trance induction state.

    Some people can be influenced by advertising. So what you see on tv
    is programming targeted at those people. The rest of us don't count.

    But the fact is that ads are everywhere you look around town. Because
    the worst that a customer can say is "I never heard of it". So make
    sure nobody can say that.

    Manchurian candidates?
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From dart200@user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Mon Jan 5 20:49:22 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 1/5/26 6:58 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sun, 4 Jan 2026 21:39:09 -0800, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/3/2026 11:55 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/3/2026 2:27 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 3 Jan 2026 10:59:43 -0800, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    On 1/3/26 9:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/3/2026 5:11 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/2/26 10:51 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 7:11 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 2:53 PM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 2:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 8:57 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 4:09 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/31/25 9:53 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/31/2025 12:33 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/30/25 9:45 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/29/2025 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:

    In the long term, commercialism is not sustainable. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure it is.

    i really fucking hate commercials tho,

    Same. The people who make them are apparently mostly idiots. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's no other rational explanation for how annoying they >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are. Want me to never buy your stuff? Do an annoying intrusive >>>>>>>>>>>>>> loud commercial.

    bro i'm not concerned about the aesthetics of ads, that's merely >>>>>>>>>>>>> a superficial concern.

    i'm actually concerned about the misinformation spread by twats >>>>>>>>>>>>> operating with the motive for personal gain.

    i can't even being the imagine the opportunity cost of having so >>>>>>>>>>>>> much of lives driven by that nonsense, and we haven't even begun >>>>>>>>>>>>> to untangle it

    How are you able to perceive that misinformation? What sort of >>>>>>>>>>>> majic superpower do you have?!


    have u even remotely looked into the history of advertising??? >>>>>>>>>>>

    Yet you are able to see right through it!

    did i say that??? i'm stuck swimming in it like everyone else is >>>>>>>>
    That's not new and it's not a revolutionary insight. You're not >>>>>>>> blessed with special powers of perception.

    EVERYONE KNOWS.

    Now what.


    u tell me: ur the one that actually supports this shit show


    Everyone knows advertising is what it is. "Disinformation" where

    they really don't,

    for example: we spent literally decades talking about how fats were some >>>>> ultimate cause of obesity when that really was just marketing by big >>>>> sugar that worked its way into actual scientific literature ...

    i mean how long did it take for doctors to stop recommending cigarettes >>>>> for things???

    oh my god, even the whole concept of muh "chemical imbalance" causing >>>>> mental illness is actually just a fucking marketing strategy ... that >>>>> one is still going strong.

    hahah. oh jeez the entire debate over global warming has been
    manufactured by big oil, LOL

    same for nuclear tbh.

    i mean, did you know the entire concept of an "american breakfast" is >>>>> basically just a giant marketing scheme???

    the list goes on ... and ofc many of these will be *controversial*, and >>>>> that's the nature of lies enshrining themselves into the collective
    consciousness

    advertisers misstate the quality of their product is already illegal, >>>>>> and culturally it's a stupid thing to do. The lost opportunity cost is >>>>>> negligible.


    you are just a fucking superficial retard wilson completely blind to all >>>>> the mistruths enslaving you to utter idiocracy without an inkling of ur >>>>> awareness.

    retard provides him an excuse.-a He can't help it.

    Oh, yes he can, and his is aware of what he does.

    He is merely trying to repeat his lies often enough that they become
    the truth.-a That might even work in the long term.

    Oh fuck off Noah. Anything you disagree with is a "lie".

    That's one way to win a debate - just call your opponent a liar.

    Nobody wins arguments around here.

    how does one "win" an argument?
    --
    hi, i'm nick! let's end war EfOa

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Tue Jan 6 07:44:33 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Mon, 5 Jan 2026 20:49:22 -0800, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    On 1/5/26 6:58 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sun, 4 Jan 2026 21:39:09 -0800, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/3/2026 11:55 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/3/2026 2:27 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 3 Jan 2026 10:59:43 -0800, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    On 1/3/26 9:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/3/2026 5:11 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/2/26 10:51 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 7:11 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 2:53 PM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 2:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 8:57 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 4:09 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/31/25 9:53 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/31/2025 12:33 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/30/25 9:45 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/29/2025 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    In the long term, commercialism is not sustainable. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure it is.

    i really fucking hate commercials tho,

    Same. The people who make them are apparently mostly idiots. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's no other rational explanation for how annoying they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are. Want me to never buy your stuff? Do an annoying intrusive >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> loud commercial.

    bro i'm not concerned about the aesthetics of ads, that's merely >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a superficial concern.

    i'm actually concerned about the misinformation spread by twats >>>>>>>>>>>>>> operating with the motive for personal gain.

    i can't even being the imagine the opportunity cost of having so >>>>>>>>>>>>>> much of lives driven by that nonsense, and we haven't even begun >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to untangle it

    How are you able to perceive that misinformation? What sort of >>>>>>>>>>>>> majic superpower do you have?!


    have u even remotely looked into the history of advertising??? >>>>>>>>>>>>

    Yet you are able to see right through it!

    did i say that??? i'm stuck swimming in it like everyone else is >>>>>>>>>
    That's not new and it's not a revolutionary insight. You're not >>>>>>>>> blessed with special powers of perception.

    EVERYONE KNOWS.

    Now what.


    u tell me: ur the one that actually supports this shit show


    Everyone knows advertising is what it is. "Disinformation" where

    they really don't,

    for example: we spent literally decades talking about how fats were some >>>>>> ultimate cause of obesity when that really was just marketing by big >>>>>> sugar that worked its way into actual scientific literature ...

    i mean how long did it take for doctors to stop recommending cigarettes >>>>>> for things???

    oh my god, even the whole concept of muh "chemical imbalance" causing >>>>>> mental illness is actually just a fucking marketing strategy ... that >>>>>> one is still going strong.

    hahah. oh jeez the entire debate over global warming has been
    manufactured by big oil, LOL

    same for nuclear tbh.

    i mean, did you know the entire concept of an "american breakfast" is >>>>>> basically just a giant marketing scheme???

    the list goes on ... and ofc many of these will be *controversial*, and >>>>>> that's the nature of lies enshrining themselves into the collective >>>>>> consciousness

    advertisers misstate the quality of their product is already illegal, >>>>>>> and culturally it's a stupid thing to do. The lost opportunity cost is >>>>>>> negligible.


    you are just a fucking superficial retard wilson completely blind to all >>>>>> the mistruths enslaving you to utter idiocracy without an inkling of ur >>>>>> awareness.

    retard provides him an excuse.a He can't help it.

    Oh, yes he can, and his is aware of what he does.

    He is merely trying to repeat his lies often enough that they become >>>>> the truth.a That might even work in the long term.

    Oh fuck off Noah. Anything you disagree with is a "lie".

    That's one way to win a debate - just call your opponent a liar.

    Nobody wins arguments around here.

    how does one "win" an argument?

    No idea.

    There is the formal debate thing where you are given a position you
    don't agree with and are tasked with defending it. A judge of some
    sort decides who won the debate. That does not mean anybody was
    convinced of anything.
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Mon Jan 12 11:40:40 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Sat, 3 Jan 2026 14:55:38 -0500, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 1/3/2026 2:27 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 3 Jan 2026 10:59:43 -0800, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    On 1/3/26 9:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/3/2026 5:11 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/2/26 10:51 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 7:11 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 2:53 PM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 2:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 1/1/26 8:57 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 1/1/2026 4:09 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/31/25 9:53 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/31/2025 12:33 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 12/30/25 9:45 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 12/29/2025 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:

    In the long term, commercialism is not sustainable. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure it is.

    i really fucking hate commercials tho,

    Same. The people who make them are apparently mostly idiots. >>>>>>>>>>>> There's no other rational explanation for how annoying they >>>>>>>>>>>> are. Want me to never buy your stuff? Do an annoying intrusive >>>>>>>>>>>> loud commercial.

    bro i'm not concerned about the aesthetics of ads, that's merely >>>>>>>>>>> a superficial concern.

    i'm actually concerned about the misinformation spread by twats >>>>>>>>>>> operating with the motive for personal gain.

    i can't even being the imagine the opportunity cost of having so >>>>>>>>>>> much of lives driven by that nonsense, and we haven't even begun >>>>>>>>>>> to untangle it

    How are you able to perceive that misinformation? What sort of >>>>>>>>>> majic superpower do you have?!


    have u even remotely looked into the history of advertising??? >>>>>>>>>

    Yet you are able to see right through it!

    did i say that??? i'm stuck swimming in it like everyone else is

    That's not new and it's not a revolutionary insight. You're not
    blessed with special powers of perception.

    EVERYONE KNOWS.

    Now what.


    u tell me: ur the one that actually supports this shit show


    Everyone knows advertising is what it is. "Disinformation" where

    they really don't,

    for example: we spent literally decades talking about how fats were some >>> ultimate cause of obesity when that really was just marketing by big
    sugar that worked its way into actual scientific literature ...

    i mean how long did it take for doctors to stop recommending cigarettes
    for things???

    oh my god, even the whole concept of muh "chemical imbalance" causing
    mental illness is actually just a fucking marketing strategy ... that
    one is still going strong.

    hahah. oh jeez the entire debate over global warming has been
    manufactured by big oil, LOL

    same for nuclear tbh.

    i mean, did you know the entire concept of an "american breakfast" is
    basically just a giant marketing scheme???

    the list goes on ... and ofc many of these will be *controversial*, and
    that's the nature of lies enshrining themselves into the collective
    consciousness

    advertisers misstate the quality of their product is already illegal,
    and culturally it's a stupid thing to do. The lost opportunity cost is >>>> negligible.


    you are just a fucking superficial retard wilson completely blind to all >>> the mistruths enslaving you to utter idiocracy without an inkling of ur
    awareness.

    retard provides him an excuse. He can't help it.

    Oh, yes he can, and his is aware of what he does.

    He is merely trying to repeat his lies often enough that they become
    the truth. That might even work in the long term.

    Oh fuck off Noah. Anything you disagree with is a "lie".

    But not retarded.
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2