• Re: O.T. --- Today's Gas Fill Up --- O.T.

    From Mars Sellus@zed@is.dead to alt.checkmate,rec.food.cooking,can.politics,alt.bible on Sat Feb 21 11:36:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.bible

    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 11:57:27 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Mars Sellus wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 17:29:53 +0000
    "Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:

    At Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:17:33 -0700, Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead>
    wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:23:12 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Mars Sellus wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 08:30:04 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack wrote:
    At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:41:45 -0700, Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead>
    wrote:
    On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:24:45 +0000
    "Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:

    At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 09:15:52 -0700, Mars Sellus
    <zed@is.dead> wrote:
    On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 03:39:19 +0000
    snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:
    [...]
    the only issue with simulation theory is zeroes. 0 X 2 >>>>>>>>>>>>> = 0 ^ 2. In the form 2a, why does 2 * 1 = 1 ^ 2?
    Certainly, 2*2 = 2^2 = 4. Very much so. 1 is an
    infinite number

    2 * 1 != 1 ^2. Your original equation was constructed >>>>>>>>>>>> using 0, which is a notorious sucker of mathematical >>>>>>>>>>>> sense.

    Zero can be extraordinarily beautiful, consider e.g.
    Euler's Identity, the sexiest formulation of zero that >>>>>>>>>>> ever there was.

    Yet we remain trapped in a misdirected matrix.

    Euler's Identity shows that things are deeply intertwingled. >>>>>>>>>
    But I think our world is natural.[*]

    [*] for varying values of "natural".[**]

    [**] The so-called "divine order", the Logos[***], seems to >>>>>>>>> be part of it.

    [***] Not the Christian one, the one from 500 years before >>>>>>>>> the fourth gospel was written.

    This DNA lab also cycles through dominant species from time
    to time.

    Reptiles of course had no religion to speak of.

    I wonder if any of them were sentient enough to make tools.

    Birds are reptiles. Birds snatch up snakes and drop them from
    great heights. Reptiles use the tool gravity.


    +1

    And don't forget the British Royal Reptile syndicate.

    Shape-Shifting: The theory suggests these entities can appear
    human to the public but are essentially alien lizards that
    maintain their power through "blood-drinking" and other dark
    rituals.

    +1

    You are on point.

    Christ is King!

    God doesn't like it when you do that.

    The Holy Trinity are as one, hadn't you heard?

    Is it that clear when the Book of Enoch is missing from the Bible?

    If you've read any of the 3 translations of the books of Enoch you will
    realize that the key elements in Enoch focus upon the multiple
    dimensions of existence he was shown by the angels as well as the staged rebellion of the "watchers/fallen angels" and their subsequent exile
    from heaven with their leader Lucifer, the 'light-bearing' angel whose introduction to mankind of forbidden technologies set our course astray
    leading to the Great Flood.

    The description of God's blindingly light "face", as reluctantly seen by
    Enoch is particularly moving.

    And even more so Enoch's eventual ascension to Heaven on God's orders,
    made above the decisions or regular actions of his angels.

    A lot to be learned there, more than I can hit and miss with you here.

    I don't teach the Trinity. I was told that married laymen cannot
    explain or understand it.

    That's a unique angle, what has marriage to do with accepting that
    the Christ was both God's son and (as such0 His physical presence on
    Earth?


    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mars Sellus@zed@is.dead to alt.checkmate,rec.food.cooking,can.politics,alt.bible on Sat Feb 21 11:48:49 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.bible

    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 18:17:55 +0000
    "Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:

    At Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:54:27 -0700, Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> wrote:

    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 17:29:53 +0000
    "Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:

    At Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:17:33 -0700, Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead>
    wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:23:12 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Mars Sellus wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 08:30:04 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack wrote:
    At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:41:45 -0700, Mars Sellus
    <zed@is.dead> wrote:
    On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:24:45 +0000
    "Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:

    At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 09:15:52 -0700, Mars Sellus
    <zed@is.dead> wrote:
    On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 03:39:19 +0000
    snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:
    [...]
    the only issue with simulation theory is zeroes. 0 >>>>>>>>> X 2 = 0 ^ 2. In the form 2a, why does 2 * 1 = 1 ^ 2? >>>>>>>>> Certainly, 2*2 = 2^2 = 4. Very much so. 1 is an
    infinite number

    2 * 1 != 1 ^2. Your original equation was
    constructed using 0, which is a notorious sucker of
    mathematical sense.

    Zero can be extraordinarily beautiful, consider e.g.
    Euler's Identity, the sexiest formulation of zero that >>>>>>> ever there was.

    Yet we remain trapped in a misdirected matrix.

    Euler's Identity shows that things are deeply
    intertwingled.

    But I think our world is natural.[*]

    [*] for varying values of "natural".[**]

    [**] The so-called "divine order", the Logos[***],
    seems to be part of it.

    [***] Not the Christian one, the one from 500 years
    before the fourth gospel was written.

    This DNA lab also cycles through dominant species from
    time to time.

    Reptiles of course had no religion to speak of.

    I wonder if any of them were sentient enough to make
    tools.
    Birds are reptiles. Birds snatch up snakes and drop them
    from great heights. Reptiles use the tool gravity.


    +1

    And don't forget the British Royal Reptile syndicate.

    Shape-Shifting: The theory suggests these entities can appear
    human to the public but are essentially alien lizards that
    maintain their power through "blood-drinking" and other dark
    rituals.

    +1

    You are on point.

    Christ is King!

    God doesn't like it when you do that.

    The Holy Trinity are as one, hadn't you heard?

    Uh huh.

    Is that a tepid denial?

    There are some lengthy theologic essays we could bandy about there, if
    you wish.



    And that must be sufficient.

    Idolatry?

    Not unless someone can prove that He is merely Landru.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kv0ZQebrwgw?feature=share

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/r1aZImZ61aw?feature=share

    Can you?

    That wouldn't make any sense.

    "Landru" is fictional.

    Fiction designed to analog in a teleplay a presumed technological
    "diety" acting as Creator before a subservient and controlled
    population.

    It was a keystone episode of the old Trek.

    The underlying premise being that any sufficiently advanced technology
    is unrecognizable from mere "magic" to a lesser species presented with
    it.

    Arthur C. Clarke Quote:

    "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic"
    is a famous quote by science fiction author Arthur C. Clarke. Known as "Clarke's Third Law," this phrase suggests that as technology
    progresses, its complexity and capabilities become so great that they
    appear supernatural to the untrained observer.'

    Deifying persons such as Hercules and Jesus is a mistake.

    Hercules of course.

    The Christ WAS/IS God's own presence and messenger here on earth.

    Jesus was and is therefore - Lord.

    Through accepting his suffering and gift of eternal salvation are we
    granted eventual entry to the Kingdom of God, and only His.

    (as Christians anyway)

    :-)




    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mars Sellus@zed@is.dead to alt.checkmate,rec.food.cooking,can.politics,alt.bible on Sat Feb 21 11:55:58 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.bible

    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 12:36:07 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Mars Sellus wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 11:34:15 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack wrote:
    At Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:17:33 -0700, Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead>
    wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:23:12 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Mars Sellus wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 08:30:04 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack wrote:
    At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:41:45 -0700, Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> >>>>>>>> wrote:
    On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:24:45 +0000
    "Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:

    At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 09:15:52 -0700, Mars Sellus
    <zed@is.dead> wrote:
    On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 03:39:19 +0000
    snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:
    [...]
    the only issue with simulation theory is zeroes. 0 X 2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> = 0 ^ 2. In the form 2a, why does 2 * 1 = 1 ^ 2? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Certainly, 2*2 = 2^2 = 4. Very much so. 1 is an
    infinite number

    2 * 1 != 1 ^2. Your original equation was constructed >>>>>>>>>>>>> using 0, which is a notorious sucker of mathematical >>>>>>>>>>>>> sense.

    Zero can be extraordinarily beautiful, consider e.g. >>>>>>>>>>>> Euler's Identity, the sexiest formulation of zero that >>>>>>>>>>>> ever there was.

    Yet we remain trapped in a misdirected matrix.

    Euler's Identity shows that things are deeply
    intertwingled.

    But I think our world is natural.[*]

    [*] for varying values of "natural".[**]

    [**] The so-called "divine order", the Logos[***], seems to >>>>>>>>>> be part of it.

    [***] Not the Christian one, the one from 500 years before >>>>>>>>>> the fourth gospel was written.

    This DNA lab also cycles through dominant species from time >>>>>>>>> to time.

    Reptiles of course had no religion to speak of.

    I wonder if any of them were sentient enough to make tools.

    Birds are reptiles. Birds snatch up snakes and drop them from
    great heights. Reptiles use the tool gravity.


    +1

    And don't forget the British Royal Reptile syndicate.

    Shape-Shifting: The theory suggests these entities can appear
    human to the public but are essentially alien lizards that
    maintain their power through "blood-drinking" and other dark
    rituals.

    +1

    You are on point.

    Christ is King!

    God doesn't like it when you do that.


    And that must be sufficient.

    Idolatry?

    The voices said Ghislaine Maxwell wanted to drink my blood because
    I am pointing to her as the ringleader of the Epstein Camp.

    You hear voices, as in multiple?

    Please elaborate.

    Mostly two voices, and of them one is the majority 90% of the time. I
    can't really elaborate. At first they were detrimental like all
    voices are. Running me down, getting on my case over everything, and
    heating up my red eyes.

    Had you been crying or emotionally in distress?

    Or do you claim to have demonic eyes.

    The latter would account for the messages they put upon you.

    Somehow 7 yrs ago I zapped them. I touched them with my mind and
    wrapped tentacles around their legs and throw them down the stairs.

    Well done sir!

    If they meant you ill it is your right to rebuke them.

    Now they are second best friend here. It's sort of like the older
    sister or the friend you know who is always right.

    Careful that they are not yet demonic deceivers, always test them by
    inquiring if the serve the will and message of Christ.

    That same test has been known to dis-empower even the pesky Grays.

    You saw
    what she wrote to Prince Andrew.

    Indeed.

    And he was arrested on his birthday at age 66, after the coincident
    bloody white horse show through London, a Revelation you must know something of?

    No conclusions but it reminds me of the Cell with J Lo and V.Vaughan.
    Those horses were in a clinical mode where they forgot about the
    blood.

    There is an entire 666 scriptural gemmatria to this incident with randy
    andy.

    I'll see if I can offer a video if you wish.


    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Doc Hammerslack@dochammerslack@creon.earth to alt.checkmate,rec.food.cooking,can.politics,alt.bible on Sat Feb 21 19:05:05 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.bible

    At Sat, 21 Feb 2026 11:48:49 -0700, Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> wrote:

    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 18:17:55 +0000
    "Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:

    At Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:54:27 -0700, Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> wrote:

    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 17:29:53 +0000
    "Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:

    At Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:17:33 -0700, Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead>
    wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:23:12 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Mars Sellus wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 08:30:04 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack wrote:
    At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:41:45 -0700, Mars Sellus
    <zed@is.dead> wrote:
    On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:24:45 +0000
    "Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:

    At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 09:15:52 -0700, Mars Sellus
    <zed@is.dead> wrote:
    On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 03:39:19 +0000
    snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:
    [...]
    the only issue with simulation theory is zeroes. 0 >>>>>>>>> X 2 = 0 ^ 2. In the form 2a, why does 2 * 1 = 1 ^ 2? >>>>>>>>> Certainly, 2*2 = 2^2 = 4. Very much so. 1 is an
    infinite number

    2 * 1 != 1 ^2. Your original equation was
    constructed using 0, which is a notorious sucker of >>>>>>>> mathematical sense.

    Zero can be extraordinarily beautiful, consider e.g. >>>>>>> Euler's Identity, the sexiest formulation of zero that >>>>>>> ever there was.

    Yet we remain trapped in a misdirected matrix.

    Euler's Identity shows that things are deeply
    intertwingled.

    But I think our world is natural.[*]

    [*] for varying values of "natural".[**]

    [**] The so-called "divine order", the Logos[***],
    seems to be part of it.

    [***] Not the Christian one, the one from 500 years
    before the fourth gospel was written.

    This DNA lab also cycles through dominant species from
    time to time.

    Reptiles of course had no religion to speak of.

    I wonder if any of them were sentient enough to make
    tools.
    Birds are reptiles. Birds snatch up snakes and drop them
    from great heights. Reptiles use the tool gravity.


    +1

    And don't forget the British Royal Reptile syndicate.

    Shape-Shifting: The theory suggests these entities can appear
    human to the public but are essentially alien lizards that
    maintain their power through "blood-drinking" and other dark rituals.

    +1

    You are on point.

    Christ is King!

    God doesn't like it when you do that.

    The Holy Trinity are as one, hadn't you heard?

    Uh huh.

    Is that a tepid denial?

    There are some lengthy theologic essays we could bandy about there, if
    you wish.



    And that must be sufficient.

    Idolatry?

    Not unless someone can prove that He is merely Landru.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kv0ZQebrwgw?feature=share

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/r1aZImZ61aw?feature=share

    Can you?

    That wouldn't make any sense.

    "Landru" is fictional.

    Fiction designed to analog in a teleplay a presumed technological
    "diety" acting as Creator before a subservient and controlled
    population.

    It was a keystone episode of the old Trek.

    The underlying premise being that any sufficiently advanced technology
    is unrecognizable from mere "magic" to a lesser species presented with
    it.

    Arthur C. Clarke Quote:

    "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic"
    is a famous quote by science fiction author Arthur C. Clarke. Known as "Clarke's Third Law," this phrase suggests that as technology
    progresses, its complexity and capabilities become so great that they
    appear supernatural to the untrained observer.'

    Deifying persons such as Hercules and Jesus is a mistake.

    Hercules of course.

    The Christ WAS/IS God's own presence and messenger here on earth.

    Jesus was and is therefore - Lord.

    "The Lord", as translated in the Bible, is a placeholder
    for "YHWH", the Tetragrammaton.


    Through accepting his suffering and gift of eternal salvation are we
    granted eventual entry to the Kingdom of God, and only His.

    (as Christians anyway)

    :-)

    I'm happy that _you_ are happy with that.

    I suppose we all have to find our paths to "the Lord", Adonai.
    --
    Doc Hammerslack
    ] The concept of "Slack" known to Emergentiles and Rewardians
    ] alike fscks that which can be, figuratively, 'smoked in "Bob's"
    ] Pipe' until it is discounted as hallucination.
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mars Sellus@zed@is.dead to alt.checkmate,rec.food.cooking,can.politics,alt.bible on Sat Feb 21 12:09:29 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.bible

    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 19:05:05 +0000
    "Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:

    At Sat, 21 Feb 2026 11:48:49 -0700, Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> wrote:

    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 18:17:55 +0000
    "Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:

    At Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:54:27 -0700, Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead>
    wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 17:29:53 +0000
    "Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:

    At Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:17:33 -0700, Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead>
    wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:23:12 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Mars Sellus wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 08:30:04 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack wrote:
    At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:41:45 -0700, Mars Sellus
    <zed@is.dead> wrote:
    On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:24:45 +0000
    "Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:

    At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 09:15:52 -0700, Mars Sellus
    <zed@is.dead> wrote:
    On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 03:39:19 +0000
    snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth>
    wrote: [...]
    the only issue with simulation theory is
    zeroes. 0 X 2 = 0 ^ 2. In the form 2a, why does >>>>>>>>> 2 * 1 = 1 ^ 2? Certainly, 2*2 = 2^2 = 4. Very
    much so. 1 is an infinite number

    2 * 1 != 1 ^2. Your original equation was
    constructed using 0, which is a notorious sucker >>>>>>>> of mathematical sense.

    Zero can be extraordinarily beautiful, consider
    e.g. Euler's Identity, the sexiest formulation of
    zero that ever there was.

    Yet we remain trapped in a misdirected matrix.


    Euler's Identity shows that things are deeply
    intertwingled.

    But I think our world is natural.[*]

    [*] for varying values of "natural".[**]

    [**] The so-called "divine order", the Logos[***],
    seems to be part of it.

    [***] Not the Christian one, the one from 500 years
    before the fourth gospel was written.

    This DNA lab also cycles through dominant species
    from time to time.

    Reptiles of course had no religion to speak of.


    I wonder if any of them were sentient enough to make
    tools.
    Birds are reptiles. Birds snatch up snakes and drop
    them from great heights. Reptiles use the tool gravity.


    +1

    And don't forget the British Royal Reptile syndicate.

    Shape-Shifting: The theory suggests these entities can
    appear human to the public but are essentially alien
    lizards that maintain their power through
    "blood-drinking" and other dark rituals.

    +1

    You are on point.

    Christ is King!

    God doesn't like it when you do that.

    The Holy Trinity are as one, hadn't you heard?

    Uh huh.

    Is that a tepid denial?

    There are some lengthy theologic essays we could bandy about there,
    if you wish.



    And that must be sufficient.

    Idolatry?

    Not unless someone can prove that He is merely Landru.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kv0ZQebrwgw?feature=share

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/r1aZImZ61aw?feature=share

    Can you?

    That wouldn't make any sense.

    "Landru" is fictional.

    Fiction designed to analog in a teleplay a presumed technological
    "diety" acting as Creator before a subservient and controlled
    population.

    It was a keystone episode of the old Trek.

    The underlying premise being that any sufficiently advanced
    technology is unrecognizable from mere "magic" to a lesser species presented with it.

    Arthur C. Clarke Quote:

    "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from
    magic" is a famous quote by science fiction author Arthur C.
    Clarke. Known as "Clarke's Third Law," this phrase suggests that as technology progresses, its complexity and capabilities become so
    great that they appear supernatural to the untrained observer.'

    Deifying persons such as Hercules and Jesus is a mistake.

    Hercules of course.

    The Christ WAS/IS God's own presence and messenger here on earth.

    Jesus was and is therefore - Lord.

    "The Lord", as translated in the Bible, is a placeholder
    for "YHWH", the Tetragrammaton.

    Are you going for a Metatron's cube analysis here?

    Or some sacred geometry?

    I can diverge over to that if you wish.


    Through accepting his suffering and gift of eternal salvation are we granted eventual entry to the Kingdom of God, and only His.

    (as Christians anyway)

    :-)

    I'm happy that _you_ are happy with that.

    Have to be, it is what I was granted here on planet prison.

    I suppose we all have to find our paths to "the Lord", Adonai.

    By whichever spelling or sound, His voice must be our rudder.


    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From zebrabible@zebrabible@proton.me to alt.bible on Sat Feb 21 15:26:14 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.bible

    test6
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From phoenix@j63840576@gmail.com to alt.checkmate,rec.food.cooking,can.politics,alt.bible on Sat Feb 21 17:36:45 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.bible

    Mars Sellus wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 12:36:07 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Mars Sellus wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 11:34:15 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack wrote:
    At Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:17:33 -0700, Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead>
    wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:23:12 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Mars Sellus wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 08:30:04 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack wrote:
    At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:41:45 -0700, Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:24:45 +0000
    "Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:

    At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 09:15:52 -0700, Mars Sellus
    <zed@is.dead> wrote:
    On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 03:39:19 +0000
    snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
    the only issue with simulation theory is zeroes. 0 X 2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> = 0 ^ 2. In the form 2a, why does 2 * 1 = 1 ^ 2? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Certainly, 2*2 = 2^2 = 4. Very much so. 1 is an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> infinite number

    2 * 1 != 1 ^2. Your original equation was constructed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using 0, which is a notorious sucker of mathematical >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sense.

    Zero can be extraordinarily beautiful, consider e.g. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Euler's Identity, the sexiest formulation of zero that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ever there was.

    Yet we remain trapped in a misdirected matrix.

    Euler's Identity shows that things are deeply
    intertwingled.

    But I think our world is natural.[*]

    [*] for varying values of "natural".[**]

    [**] The so-called "divine order", the Logos[***], seems to >>>>>>>>>>>> be part of it.

    [***] Not the Christian one, the one from 500 years before >>>>>>>>>>>> the fourth gospel was written.

    This DNA lab also cycles through dominant species from time >>>>>>>>>>> to time.

    Reptiles of course had no religion to speak of.

    I wonder if any of them were sentient enough to make tools. >>>>>>>>>>
    Birds are reptiles. Birds snatch up snakes and drop them from >>>>>>>>> great heights. Reptiles use the tool gravity.


    +1

    And don't forget the British Royal Reptile syndicate.

    Shape-Shifting: The theory suggests these entities can appear
    human to the public but are essentially alien lizards that
    maintain their power through "blood-drinking" and other dark
    rituals.

    +1

    You are on point.

    Christ is King!

    God doesn't like it when you do that.


    And that must be sufficient.

    Idolatry?

    The voices said Ghislaine Maxwell wanted to drink my blood because
    I am pointing to her as the ringleader of the Epstein Camp.

    You hear voices, as in multiple?

    Please elaborate.

    Mostly two voices, and of them one is the majority 90% of the time. I
    can't really elaborate. At first they were detrimental like all
    voices are. Running me down, getting on my case over everything, and
    heating up my red eyes.

    Had you been crying or emotionally in distress?

    I meant that I got angry. I don't really know the metaphors for anger
    very well, being a man of self-control.

    Or do you claim to have demonic eyes.

    The latter would account for the messages they put upon you.

    Somehow 7 yrs ago I zapped them. I touched them with my mind and
    wrapped tentacles around their legs and throw them down the stairs.

    Well done sir!

    If they meant you ill it is your right to rebuke them.

    Now they are second best friend here. It's sort of like the older
    sister or the friend you know who is always right.

    Careful that they are not yet demonic deceivers, always test them by inquiring if the serve the will and message of Christ.

    That same test has been known to dis-empower even the pesky Grays.

    You saw
    what she wrote to Prince Andrew.

    Indeed.

    And he was arrested on his birthday at age 66, after the coincident
    bloody white horse show through London, a Revelation you must know
    something of?

    No conclusions but it reminds me of the Cell with J Lo and V.Vaughan.
    Those horses were in a clinical mode where they forgot about the
    blood.

    There is an entire 666 scriptural gemmatria to this incident with randy
    andy.

    I'll see if I can offer a video if you wish.


    --
    pBkHHoOIIn8
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mars Sellus@zed@is.dead to alt.checkmate,rec.food.cooking,can.politics,alt.bible on Sat Feb 21 16:42:17 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.bible

    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 17:36:45 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Mars Sellus wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 12:36:07 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Mars Sellus wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 11:34:15 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack wrote:
    At Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:17:33 -0700, Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead>
    wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:23:12 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Mars Sellus wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 08:30:04 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack wrote:
    At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:41:45 -0700, Mars Sellus
    <zed@is.dead> wrote:
    On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:24:45 +0000
    "Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:

    At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 09:15:52 -0700, Mars Sellus
    <zed@is.dead> wrote:
    On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 03:39:19 +0000
    snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
    the only issue with simulation theory is zeroes. 0 X >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 = 0 ^ 2. In the form 2a, why does 2 * 1 = 1 ^ 2? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Certainly, 2*2 = 2^2 = 4. Very much so. 1 is an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> infinite number

    2 * 1 != 1 ^2. Your original equation was constructed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using 0, which is a notorious sucker of mathematical >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sense.

    Zero can be extraordinarily beautiful, consider e.g. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Euler's Identity, the sexiest formulation of zero that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ever there was.

    Yet we remain trapped in a misdirected matrix.

    Euler's Identity shows that things are deeply
    intertwingled.

    But I think our world is natural.[*]

    [*] for varying values of "natural".[**]

    [**] The so-called "divine order", the Logos[***], seems >>>>>>>>>>>> to be part of it.

    [***] Not the Christian one, the one from 500 years
    before the fourth gospel was written.

    This DNA lab also cycles through dominant species from >>>>>>>>>>> time to time.

    Reptiles of course had no religion to speak of.

    I wonder if any of them were sentient enough to make tools. >>>>>>>>>>
    Birds are reptiles. Birds snatch up snakes and drop them
    from great heights. Reptiles use the tool gravity.


    +1

    And don't forget the British Royal Reptile syndicate.

    Shape-Shifting: The theory suggests these entities can appear
    human to the public but are essentially alien lizards that
    maintain their power through "blood-drinking" and other dark
    rituals.

    +1

    You are on point.

    Christ is King!

    God doesn't like it when you do that.


    And that must be sufficient.

    Idolatry?

    The voices said Ghislaine Maxwell wanted to drink my blood
    because I am pointing to her as the ringleader of the Epstein
    Camp.

    You hear voices, as in multiple?

    Please elaborate.

    Mostly two voices, and of them one is the majority 90% of the
    time. I can't really elaborate. At first they were detrimental
    like all voices are. Running me down, getting on my case over
    everything, and heating up my red eyes.

    Had you been crying or emotionally in distress?

    I meant that I got angry. I don't really know the metaphors for anger
    very well, being a man of self-control.

    Understood, it fits that.

    Those voices were not your friends.

    But some (I believe) can be.

    Test using Christ and all will be revealed.




    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Hank Rogers@Hank@nospam.invalid to alt.checkmate,rec.food.cooking,can.politics,alt.bible on Sat Feb 21 18:11:37 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.bible

    Mars Sellus wrote on 2/21/2026 5:42 PM:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 17:36:45 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Mars Sellus wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 12:36:07 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Mars Sellus wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 11:34:15 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack wrote:
    At Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:17:33 -0700, Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead>
    wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:23:12 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Mars Sellus wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 08:30:04 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack wrote:
    At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:41:45 -0700, Mars Sellus
    <zed@is.dead> wrote:
    On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:24:45 +0000
    "Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 09:15:52 -0700, Mars Sellus
    <zed@is.dead> wrote:
    On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 03:39:19 +0000
    snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
    the only issue with simulation theory is zeroes. 0 X >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 = 0 ^ 2. In the form 2a, why does 2 * 1 = 1 ^ 2? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Certainly, 2*2 = 2^2 = 4. Very much so. 1 is an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> infinite number

    2 * 1 != 1 ^2. Your original equation was constructed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using 0, which is a notorious sucker of mathematical >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sense.

    Zero can be extraordinarily beautiful, consider e.g. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Euler's Identity, the sexiest formulation of zero that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ever there was.

    Yet we remain trapped in a misdirected matrix.

    Euler's Identity shows that things are deeply
    intertwingled.

    But I think our world is natural.[*]

    [*] for varying values of "natural".[**]

    [**] The so-called "divine order", the Logos[***], seems >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be part of it.

    [***] Not the Christian one, the one from 500 years >>>>>>>>>>>>>> before the fourth gospel was written.

    This DNA lab also cycles through dominant species from >>>>>>>>>>>>> time to time.

    Reptiles of course had no religion to speak of.

    I wonder if any of them were sentient enough to make tools. >>>>>>>>>>>>
    Birds are reptiles. Birds snatch up snakes and drop them >>>>>>>>>>> from great heights. Reptiles use the tool gravity.


    +1

    And don't forget the British Royal Reptile syndicate.

    Shape-Shifting: The theory suggests these entities can appear >>>>>>>>> human to the public but are essentially alien lizards that
    maintain their power through "blood-drinking" and other dark >>>>>>>>> rituals.

    +1

    You are on point.

    Christ is King!

    God doesn't like it when you do that.


    And that must be sufficient.

    Idolatry?

    The voices said Ghislaine Maxwell wanted to drink my blood
    because I am pointing to her as the ringleader of the Epstein
    Camp.

    You hear voices, as in multiple?

    Please elaborate.

    Mostly two voices, and of them one is the majority 90% of the
    time. I can't really elaborate. At first they were detrimental
    like all voices are. Running me down, getting on my case over
    everything, and heating up my red eyes.

    Had you been crying or emotionally in distress?

    I meant that I got angry. I don't really know the metaphors for anger
    very well, being a man of self-control.

    Understood, it fits that.

    Those voices were not your friends.

    But some (I believe) can be.

    Test using Christ and all will be revealed.


    It's a hell of a lot faster and easier to simply go to truth social and
    ask. The answer is always perfectly acceptable to christ.



    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mars Sellus@zed@is.dead to alt.checkmate,rec.food.cooking,can.politics,alt.bible on Sat Feb 21 22:28:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.bible

    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 18:11:37 -0600
    Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> wrote:

    Mars Sellus wrote on 2/21/2026 5:42 PM:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 17:36:45 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Mars Sellus wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 12:36:07 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Mars Sellus wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 11:34:15 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack wrote:
    At Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:17:33 -0700, Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead>
    wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:23:12 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Mars Sellus wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 08:30:04 -0600
    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack wrote:
    At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:41:45 -0700, Mars Sellus
    <zed@is.dead> wrote:
    On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:24:45 +0000
    "Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 09:15:52 -0700, Mars Sellus
    <zed@is.dead> wrote:
    On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 03:39:19 +0000
    snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

    Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
    the only issue with simulation theory is zeroes. 0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> X 2 = 0 ^ 2. In the form 2a, why does 2 * 1 = 1 ^ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2? Certainly, 2*2 = 2^2 = 4. Very much so. 1 is an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> infinite number

    2 * 1 != 1 ^2. Your original equation was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constructed using 0, which is a notorious sucker of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mathematical sense.

    Zero can be extraordinarily beautiful, consider e.g. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Euler's Identity, the sexiest formulation of zero >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that ever there was.

    Yet we remain trapped in a misdirected matrix. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Euler's Identity shows that things are deeply
    intertwingled.

    But I think our world is natural.[*]

    [*] for varying values of "natural".[**]

    [**] The so-called "divine order", the Logos[***], >>>>>>>>>>>>>> seems to be part of it.

    [***] Not the Christian one, the one from 500 years >>>>>>>>>>>>>> before the fourth gospel was written.

    This DNA lab also cycles through dominant species from >>>>>>>>>>>>> time to time.

    Reptiles of course had no religion to speak of.

    I wonder if any of them were sentient enough to make >>>>>>>>>>>> tools.
    Birds are reptiles. Birds snatch up snakes and drop them >>>>>>>>>>> from great heights. Reptiles use the tool gravity.


    +1

    And don't forget the British Royal Reptile syndicate.

    Shape-Shifting: The theory suggests these entities can
    appear human to the public but are essentially alien
    lizards that maintain their power through "blood-drinking" >>>>>>>>> and other dark rituals.

    +1

    You are on point.

    Christ is King!

    God doesn't like it when you do that.


    And that must be sufficient.

    Idolatry?

    The voices said Ghislaine Maxwell wanted to drink my blood
    because I am pointing to her as the ringleader of the Epstein
    Camp.

    You hear voices, as in multiple?

    Please elaborate.

    Mostly two voices, and of them one is the majority 90% of the
    time. I can't really elaborate. At first they were detrimental
    like all voices are. Running me down, getting on my case over
    everything, and heating up my red eyes.

    Had you been crying or emotionally in distress?

    I meant that I got angry. I don't really know the metaphors for
    anger very well, being a man of self-control.

    Understood, it fits that.

    Those voices were not your friends.

    But some (I believe) can be.

    Test using Christ and all will be revealed.


    It's a hell of a lot faster and easier to simply go to truth social
    and ask. The answer is always perfectly acceptable to christ.

    Christ isn't grading social media yet, when He does, watch out!

    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2