• Re: Insights on 1 Samuel 27

    From James to alt.christnet.christnews,alt.bible,alt.religion.christian on Mon Dec 15 14:57:49 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.bible

    On Mon, 17 Nov 2025 17:09:52 -0600, Christ Rose
    <usenet@christrose.news> wrote:

    James claims Jesus is oa god,

    Correct. According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, the Greek grammar at
    John 1:1 should show the Word to be "a god". As it says:

    "Was God:lack of a definite article with "God" in Greek signifies
    predication rather than identification".

    Here are some others:

    "the Logos was divine." (MO);
    "the Word was divine." (AT; SD);
    "a god was the Word." (interlinear ED) ;
    "the Word was a god" (NTIV).
    "the Word was a god." (NWT)
    "The Word was deity." (Simple English)

    But notice:

    -- New King James
    John 10:33 The Jews answered Him, saying, "For a good work we do not
    stone You, but for blasphemy, and because You, being a Man, make
    Yourself God.''

    Every translation I looked at said "God", not "a god". So how did
    Jesus understand it? John 10:34-36,

    " 34. Jesus answered them, "Is it not written in your law, `I said,
    "You are gods'' '?
    35. "If He called them gods, to whom the word of God came (and the
    Scripture cannot be broken),
    36. "do you say of Him whom the Father sanctified and sent into the
    world, `You are blaspheming,' because I said, `I am the Son of God'? "
    (NKJV)

    Thus Jesus understood them to say he was claiming to be "a god", not
    "God".

    Was Jesus offended being called "a god"? He should be if he was really
    God. But he didn't imply that at all.

    o denies His eternal deity,

    I never said that. You apparently are defining "deity" as being God.
    Which can be true. But it can also mean "a god", which is also true.

    "
    deity
    noun
    de+?i+?ty 'de-?-te
    'da-
    plural deities
    Synonyms of deity
    1
    a
    : the rank or essential nature of a god or goddess : divinity
    b
    Deity : god sense 1, supreme being
    2
    : a god (see god entry 1 sense 2) or goddess
    the deities of ancient Greece" (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/deity)

    denies His equality with the Father,

    The Bible denies that.

    Jesus on earth:

    - New King James
    John 14:28 "You have heard Me say to you, `I am going away and coming
    back to you.' If you loved Me, you would rejoice because I said, `I am
    going to the Father,' for My Father is greater than I.

    Jesus in Heaven:

    -- King James
    1 Corinthians 11:3 But I would have you know, that the head of every
    man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of
    Christ is God.

    and denies that John 1:1 teaches the full
    deity of the Word. The lie he slips in here is simple and consistent:

    He tries to hide the denial of ChristAs deity by redefining the word
    odeityo to mean oa lesser divine being,o while Scripture uses oGodo for
    the one true eternal Creator. He inserts the NWT mistranslation oa godo
    to justify a creature-Christ, then builds his entire argument around
    that false premise.

    First, see above the Webster's definition of "deity".

    I simply go by the Bible. If it says Jesus is God, then I go by that.
    But if it doesn't, I don't bend the Scriptures like the churches do to
    justify their beliefs.

    The Bible clearly shows Jesus is not equal to God:

    John 14:28 "The Father is greater than I am".
    1 Cor 11:3 "and the head of Christ is God."

    I am not trying to make you a Jehovah's Witness (that's up to you),
    but only to show you the churchless truths from the Bible.


    He then appeals to Colossians 1:15 and uses ofirstborno as if it means >ofirst created,o while ignoring the context that defines Christ as the >Creator of all things, the One in whom all things hold together
    (Colossians 1:16u17, ESV).

    The context of Col 1:15-17 are things CREATED. It names them. Now for
    your inquiry:

    A scripture verse can say "all" but really imply 'all other'. For
    example, Mt 6:33,

    "But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all
    these things shall be added unto you." (KJV) Or all these 'other'
    things (food, drink, clothing; vs 31) shall be added to you.

    Also concerning Colossians 1:16, 17 the Greek word here rendered "all
    things" is "panta", an inflected form of "pas". At Luke 13:2, RSV
    renders this "all . . .other"; JB reads "any other"; NE says "anyone
    else." (See also Luke 21:29 in NE and Philippians 2:21 in JB.) So the
    words "all things" don't have to be all inclusive.
    So in harmony with everything else that the Bible says regarding the
    Son, the NWT assigns the same meaning to "panta" at Colossians 1:16,
    17 so that it reads, in part, "by means of him all [other] things were
    created . . . All [other] things have been created through him and for
    him." Thus he is shown to be a created being, part of the creation
    produced by God, as many of the scriptures we discussed so far show.
    (taken from "Reasoning from the Scriptures")


    He pretends to affirm the whole Bible while rejecting every passage that >teaches ChristAs full deity, His eternal existence, His equality with
    the Father, and His role as Jehovah Himself.

    Christ is "a god".
    Christ died once, but will live forever now.
    John 14:28 and 1 Cor 11:3 show he is not equal to God.

    I don't know why you ignore those two Scriptures. They are clear and
    simple.


    He also tries to dodge the force of passages that identify Jesus as
    Jehovah by inserting the NWTAs altered text and then shifting the >conversation to the 144,000 to distract from the contradictions.

    I am not being cleaver. I am just trying to share Bible truths before
    this world ends.


    He claims that owe witness for Jehovah and His Son,o but then denies
    that the Son shares the nature, glory, and attributes of the Father,
    even though Scripture says:

    Not at all. He shares a lot with God. See John 10:30 and John 14:9.
    (and with it review John 14:28)

    oIn the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word
    was Godo (John 1:1, ESV).

    With Greek grammar not being held to, you can make it say anything. At
    any rate, it is not just the NWT that differs:

    The Catholic Encyclopedia discusses the Greek grammar rules there.
    (see above)

    "the Logos was divine." (MO);
    "the Word was divine." (AT; SD);
    "a god was the Word." (interlinear ED) ;
    "the Word was a god" (NTIV).
    "the Word was a god." (NWT)
    "The Word was deity." (Simple English)

    Remember, "deity" can also mean "a god". And it is similar with the
    word "divine".

    Jesus is a deity and is divine. Thus no need to persecute JW's on that
    matter.


    This directly dismantles the lie he is trying to sneak into the discussion.

    You still don't know what a "lie" is. Here is a couple examples:

    I say Jesus is not Almighty God. That is not a lie. Why? Because I
    firmly believe that.

    Now if I say I am an astronaut. That would be a lie because I know
    that is not true and am trying to deceive.

    Can you see the difference now? So all the Bible things you accuse me
    of lying, are not really lies. From your perspective they are
    falsehoods, but are not lies according to Webster.

    "AWAKE!
    Coping With Rising Prices?uManage Your Funds Wisely
    Consider five money-saving tips that can help you manage your
    finances.
    Learn More".
    See jw.org (12/15/2025)
    James: zebrabible@proton.me
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Christ Rose@usenet@christrose.news to alt.christnet.christnews,alt.bible,alt.religion.christian on Mon Dec 15 21:16:23 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.bible

    On 12/15/2025 1:57 PM, James wrote:
    This directly dismantles the lie he is trying to sneak into the discussion.

    You still don't know what a "lie" is.


    That statement is a lie, and the Bible clearly exposes and refutes it:

    rCLEven him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all
    power and signs and lying wonders, And with all deceivableness
    of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received
    not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for
    this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should
    believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not
    the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.rCY (2
    Thessalonians 2:9rCo12, KJV 1900)

    Note: It says these people who reject the truth will "believe a lie".
    God still calls it a "lie", even though they "believe" it to be true.
    Intent determines personal guilt for lying. Truth determines whether a
    claim stands or falls. A falsehood remains a lie even when sincerely
    believed.
    --
    Have you heard the good news Christ died for our sins (rCa), and God
    raised Him from the dead?

    That Christ died for our sins shows we're sinners who deserve the death penalty. That God raised Him from the dead shows Christ's death
    satisfied God's righteous demands against our sin (Romans 3:25; 1 John
    2:1-2). This means God can now remain just, while forgiving you of your
    sins, and saving you from eternal damnation.

    On the basis of Christ's death and resurrection for our sins, call on
    the name of the Lord to save you: "For 'everyone who calls on the name
    of the Lord will be saved'" (Romans 10:13, ESV).

    https://christrose.news/salvation

    To automatically receive daily Bible teaching updates with colorful
    images and website formatting, subscribe to my feed in a client like Thunderbird:

    https://www.christrose.news/feeds/posts/default
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2