From Newsgroup: alt.atheism


Look. If you're a Greta worshiper, if you think the
mainstream media exists to inform you, if you think
only stupid people "Question the science" and test
ideas/results, you probably can't grasp a word of
the following...

https://youtu.be/MTDt2SzGglM?si=1rTr4F5OHG0OGrdq

No the video is not about Gwobull Warbling per se.
It's about refusing to doubt much less question much
less test the results that "The Science" has handed
you.

If the police in this case had asked any questions,
*Any* what so ever, do the absolutely minimum
confirmation work, they would not have gotten it
so wrong. They would not have ended up looking like
a Delta Dawn/MyCock/typical mental case.

Recently, one of the magical alters, a manifestation
of our resident troll, posted a cite they never
read nor could ever hope to understand, a "Cite"
which claimed that Greenland was the warmest it had
been in a thousand years.

It's not.

And not only is this story oops I meant "Climate
Science" a lie but a bare-basic investigation, the
minimal effort to confirm claims would have exposed
the lies. Easily.

Greenland used to be warmer. There's plenty of
evidence for this. There's an ABUNDANCE of evidence
showing that Greenland is warmer. Even Google A.I.,
which admittedly sucks out loud, says that Greenland
used to be 1.5C WARMER!

THE EARTH HAS COOLED 1.5C SINCE THE VIKINGS LANDED
ON GREENLAND!!!!

Again, according to Google A.I. which isn't even a
very good source. But, trees could grow where it is
presently too cold for them. in some instances we
have undeniable PROOF, not just evidence that the
trees could grow in that their roots grew into the
graves of some Vikings!

Sp physical evidence: "The trees /Could/ grow here,
it was warm enough for them, and now they can't."

But, Gwobull Warbling is not and never has been about
science. Mostly it's a social phenomenon. If you want
to be popular you've got to say what's popular. But
it's also about identity.

Blind obedience, compliance with media edicts means
you're smart, it means you're SUPERIOR. You're better
than those darn "Climate Deniers." They are inferior to
you. So if you doubt the narrative you lose your
identity as a superior, intelligent person.

It's gone.

Hence, the ABCs of AGE:

Agree. Believe. Comply.

Question the narrative and you are an outsider. You're
no longer a member of the elite. You're not longer a
savior of the planet. You're no longer smarter than all
those CLIMATE DENIERS. No, question the narrative and
everything you thought you were -- your identity -- is
gone.

...next thing you know you'll be down to one
gender, or no more than a handful anyway.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/

--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

On 2/21/2026 6:52 PM, JTEM wrote:

Look. If you're a Greta worshiper, if you think the
mainstream media exists to inform you,

Honey, your disagreement is with the Universe, Reality, and not with me
or anyone else who believes in the "consensus" view regarding
anthropogenic climate change.

Dawn

P.S. Okay, I use the word "believe" because I am not into modeling second-order PDEs, although, I have studied those formally and
informally over the decades, but I am not an expert. (By the way, are
you??)
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

In article <10ndvrr$1r2er$1@dont-email.me>,
Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> wrote:

On 2/21/2026 6:52 PM, JTEM wrote:

Look. If you're a Greta worshiper, if you think the
mainstream media exists to inform you,

Honey, your disagreement is with the Universe, Reality, and not with me
or anyone else who believes in the "consensus" view regarding
anthropogenic climate change.

JTEM is obviously a lost cause and I'm frankly surprised you are spending (wasting) as much time on him as you do. You're trying to teach science to someone with a kindergarten level of education. Can't be done.

That said, this seems like as good a time as any for me to lay out (yet
again) the truth about global warming (aka, climate change):

1) That it is real and is happening - obviously true. Denying it is
akin to believing (and preaching) flat earth. (But see below; it if
makes you feel better, why not?)

2) That we can do anything about it technologically. Maybe, probably not.

3) That we can do anything about it politically/socially/economically
(i.e., given realities of human nature and behavior). Definitely not.

Given #3, both #1 and #2 are ultimately irrelevant. And so, as I've
mentioned earlier, JTEM (and others of his ilk) are actually right to deny
it if it makes them feel better. It doesn't really hurt anything.
--
A pervert, a racist, and a con man walk into a bar...

Bartender says, "What will you have, Donald!"

--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

On 2/21/26 11:14 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

Honey, your disagreement is with the Universe

Oh. I usually spell it "The history of the planet's climate"
or even "The Quaternary Ice Age."

I could explain why but, I have. It didn't "Take." Not for
you.


Good luck burning up in an ice age though!
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

On 2/22/26 6:20 AM, Kenny McCormack wrote:

JTEM is obviously a lost cause

"How dare he think! DOESN'T HE KNOW QUESTIONS AREN'T
ALLOWED?!?!?!"

The ABCs of climate hysterics:

Agree. Believe. Comply.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

On 2/22/2026 5:20 AM, Kenny McCormack wrote:

In article <10ndvrr$1r2er$1@dont-email.me>,
Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> wrote:

On 2/21/2026 6:52 PM, JTEM wrote:

Look. If you're a Greta worshiper, if you think the
mainstream media exists to inform you,

Honey, your disagreement is with the Universe, Reality, and not with me
or anyone else who believes in the "consensus" view regarding
anthropogenic climate change.

JTEM is obviously a lost cause and I'm frankly surprised you are spending (wasting) as much time on him as you do. You're trying to teach science to someone with a kindergarten level of education. Can't be done.

That said, this seems like as good a time as any for me to lay out (yet again) the truth about global warming (aka, climate change):

1) That it is real and is happening - obviously true. Denying it is
akin to believing (and preaching) flat earth. (But see below; it if
makes you feel better, why not?)

2) That we can do anything about it technologically. Maybe, probably not.

3) That we can do anything about it politically/socially/economically
(i.e., given realities of human nature and behavior). Definitely not.

Given #3, both #1 and #2 are ultimately irrelevant. And so, as I've mentioned earlier, JTEM (and others of his ilk) are actually right to deny
it if it makes them feel better. It doesn't really hurt anything.

Yep. I'm replying to him less & less (or, at least trying to.)

Dawn
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

On 2/22/26 8:10 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:

Yep.-a I'm replying

"Reacting."

You lack the education, much less the intelligence, to
respond to anything I say. This much you've proved
beyond the shadow of a doubt many, many, many, many,
many times.

Take this thread, for example.

You were triggered by my posting an example of some
damn fools "Trusting the science," pretending it was
gospel truth instead of a starting point... like
you portray yourself here in all your alters.

if the cops in that video had not been mouth breathing
fools they would have seen the science as a starting
point, made some effort to verify the "Data" provided
by the technology -- the science -- and not looked like
you and one of your other alters.

That's it.

"Look! It thinks it's THIS guy! Let's try to very this,
falsifying it if the science got it wrong and nailing him
if it turns out to be right!"

So, mentally ill troll calling itself "Dawn" here: Did
you investigate Greenland? Did you find out if it really
was a lot warmer today, and thus falsified this "Science"
you pretend is gospel?

Did you? Or do you remain a mentally ill troll?
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

Kenny McCormack wrote:

JTEM is

If my punches are missing, why do you keep crying "OUCH?"

Your name isn't Kenny or Dawn or any of the other abandoned
usenet handles you pilfered, to cower behind.

You're not educated. You're not intelligent. You're not even
interested in any of these topics. No. You're simple an
emotionally need twat.

That's all.

You were literally TRIGGERED by a video illustrating the
stupidity of pretending "Science" is the all-holy gospels
instead of a tool -- a starting point.

You were triggered by this. This triggered you. And that's
a lot of things but "Mentally stable" isn't one of them.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2