• Breaking pandemic news --> We are 100% certain that MichaelE does **not** have COVID-19 today (01/12/26) ...

    From HeartDoc Andrew@achung@EmoryCardiology.com to sci.med.cardiology,alt.atheism,alt.support.diabetes,sci.med,alt.christnet.christianlife on Mon Jan 12 13:34:55 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

    Michael Ejercito wrote:
    HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
    Michael Ejercito wrote:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1q8c00g/this_is_what_weve_been_saying_for_years_face/

    Face masks ainadequateA and should be swapped for respirators, WHO is
    advised
    Experts are urging guideline changes on what health professionals should >>> wear to protect against flu-like illnesses including Covid
    Supported by
    theguardian.org
    About this content
    Kat Lay Global health correspondent
    Fri 9 Jan 2026 04.49 EST
    Share
    Surgical face masks provide inadequate protection against flu-like
    illnesses including Covid, and should be replaced by respirator-level
    masks u worn every time doctors and nurses are face to face with a
    patient, according to a group of experts urging changes to World Health
    Organization guidelines.
    There is ono rational justification remaining for prioritising or usingo >>> the surgical masks that are ubiquitous in hospitals and clinics
    globally, given their oinadequate protection against airborne
    pathogenso, they said in a letter to WHO chief Dr Tedros Adhanom
    Ghebreyesus.
    oThere is even less justification for allowing healthcare workers to
    wear no face covering at all,o they said.
    At the height of the Covid pandemic an estimated 129bn disposable face
    masks were being used around the world every month, by the public and
    healthcare workers, with surgical masks the most widely available and
    recommended by most health authorities.
    Respirators designed to filter tiny particles u such as masks meeting
    FFP2/3 standards in the UK or N95 in the US u should instead be standard >>> practice for medical interactions, they said.
    As additional evidence emerged over the course of the pandemic,
    officials in many countries switched to recommending those masks as more >>> effective.
    The proposals would result in fewer infections in patients and health
    professionals, and reduce rates of sickness, absence and burnout in the
    health workforce, the authors contended.
    The differences between a face mask and a FFP2 respirator
    Face masks are loose fitting and designed for one-way protection, to
    protect others from coughs and sneezes
    The FFP2 respirator is a tight-fitting mask, which creates a facial seal >>> and filters both inflow and outflow of air
    Covers nose and mouth
    Tight fit over nose and mouth
    WHO recommends a three-layer mask when people can't socially distance
    Majority of masks do not have a safety rating
    Removes 94% of all particles that are 0.3 microns in diameter or larger
    Designed to protect the wearer up to the safety rating of the mask
    Guardian graphic
    Prof Adam Finkel of the University of Michigan School of Public Health,
    one of the letterAs organisers, said surgical masks were not designed to >>> stop airborne pathogens but oinvented to stop doctors and nurses from
    sneezing into the guts and the hearts of patientso.
    Surgical masks are to respirators what the typewriter was to the modern
    computer, said Finkel, who was chief regulatory official at the US
    Occupational Safety and Health Administration between 1995 and 2000:
    oObsolete.o
    The letter came out of discussions at an online conference organised
    last year called Unpolitics, looking at the implementation of
    evidence-based policies. It was authored by seven clinicians and
    scientists, including Finkel, and has been endorsed by almost 50 senior
    clinicians and researchers, and more than 2,000 members of the public,
    including clinically vulnerable patients.
    There could be ooff-rampso, where governments or establishments decide
    respirators are not necessary, based on factors such as community
    infection rates, and ventilation or air filtration devices in a room,
    the letter says.
    While the suggested guidance would apply only in healthcare settings,
    where the risk of infection is higher, it is likely to provoke
    controversy. Face masks became a culture war issue during the Covid
    pandemic.
    In December, Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said she had been oslightly
    traumatised by all the mask wearing that we had to do during Covido in
    response to comments by an NHS leader saying people with flu symptoms
    omust wearo a face mask in public.
    The WHO cannot mandate global policies, but the signatories argue that
    an update to its infection prevention and control guidelines to
    recommend respirators could have a profound impact.
    They also suggest that the WHOAs procurement infrastructure could help
    increase access to respirators even in poorer countries, with production >>> of surgical masks phased down over time.
    Surgical masks are still obetter than nothingo, Finkel conceded, with
    studies suggesting they block approximately 40% of Covid-sized particles >>> in the air, compared with approximately 80% (and up to 98%) for respirators.
    He says the comparative reduction in risk can be thought of like falling >>> off a wall of four inches rather than four feet: oYou can still trip and >>> break an ankle at four inches, but youAre much better off.o
    Critics of the groupAs arguments point to a lack of randomised
    controlled trials showing that physical measures slow the spread of
    respiratory viruses. Finkel and the other authors say such trials are
    inherently flawed and misleading, for example because people in a trial
    will not wear masks 24/7 and could be exposed to pathogens while unmasked. >>> Instead they say physical tests showing that respirators stop particles, >>> conducted in laboratories, offer sufficient evidence.
    FFP2 face masks being tested at Moldex-Metric, a German protective
    workwear manufacturer.
    View image in fullscreen
    FFP2 face masks being tested at Moldex-Metric, a German protective
    workwear manufacturer. Photograph: Thomas Kienzle/AFP/Getty Images
    The WHO has been criticised for being slow to describe Covid-19 as
    spreading via oairborneo particles and the letter also calls for it to
    revisit earlier statements and ounambiguously inform the public that it
    spreads via airborne respiratory particleso.
    Prof Trisha Greenhalgh of the University of Oxford, whose research is
    cited extensively in the letter and is one of its signatories, said: oA
    germ that does not get inside someone cannot make them sick. By sealing
    against the face, respirators force airflow to pass through them,
    filtering out the airborne germs. Respirators are designed to fit
    closely around the face and meet high filtration standards. Medical
    masks, in contrast, fit loosely and leak extensively.o
    The letterAs supporters include members of the World Health Network,
    prominent US epidemiologist Eric Feigl-Ding, and Guardian columnist
    George Monbiot.
    A WHO spokesperson said the letter required ocareful reviewo. They said
    the organisation consulted widely with experts from different health and >>> economic contexts when producing guidance on personal protective
    equipment for health workers, adding: oWe are currently reviewing WHOAs
    Infection Prevention and Control guidelines for epidemic and
    pandemic-prone acute respiratory infections, based on the latest
    scientific evidence to ensure protection of health workers.o

    In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
    GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
    secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
    us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
    pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
    100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
    appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).

    Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
    COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the US & elsewhere is by
    rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
    moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
    contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
    "convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
    self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
    Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
    scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
    Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
    combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
    that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
    longer effective.

    Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
    https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ >> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.

    So how are you ?

    I am wonderfully hungry!

    While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
    8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
    17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
    COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
    Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
    Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
    always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
    including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
    all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
    the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

    Laus DEO !

    USENET source:
    https://newsgrouper.org/sci.med.cardiology/1768156639/1768242477

    Positive control on USENET: https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/7ixdk7t6Bk8/m/xpbS2z7QAAAJ

    Suggested further reading: https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/5EWtT4CwCOg/m/QjNF57xRBAAJ

    Shorter link:
    http://bit.ly/StatCOVID-19Test

    Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
    diabetics and other heart disease patients:

    http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
    ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
    (Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
    removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

    ...because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

    HeartDoc Andrew <><
    --
    Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
    Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
    2028 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President: http://WonderfullyHungry.org
    and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
    http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
    which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2