https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
WillDockery wrote:
Zodrslight.i2p wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
Fantastic quote about the Jack Kerouac writing method, which is still used by poets to this day, for example, John Darnielle of the Mountain Goats:
"Cold At Night" / The Mountain Goats
***
Will Dockery wrote:
Zodrslight.i2p wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
Fantastic quote about the Jack Kerouac writing method, which is still used by poets to this day, for example, John Darnielle of the Mountain Goats:
"Cold At Night" / The Mountain Goats
***
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism (Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same thing.
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable shit," Jack's poetry had no basic form for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded... much the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
This is a response to the post seen at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=660030815#660030815
Zod wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
Zodrslight.i2p wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
Fantastic quote about the Jack Kerouac writing method, which is still used by poets to this day, for example, John Darnielle of the Mountain Goats:
"Cold At Night" / The Mountain Goats
***
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism (Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same thing.
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic form for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded... much the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
This is a response to the post seen at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=660030815#660030815
Okay, you probably know that I don't mind being compared with Jack Kerouac.
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
Zod wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
Fantastic quote about the Jack Kerouac writing method, which is still used by poets to this day, for example, John Darnielle of the Mountain Goats:
"Cold At Night" / The Mountain Goats
***
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism (Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same thing. >>
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic form for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded... much the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
This is a response to the post seen at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=660030815#660030815
Okay, you probably know that I don't mind being compared with Jack Kerouac.
I wasn't comparing you to Kerouac
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
Zod wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
Fantastic quote about the Jack Kerouac writing method, which is still used by poets to this day, for example, John Darnielle of the Mountain Goats:
"Cold At Night" / The Mountain Goats
***
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism (Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same thing. >>
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of the musical piece.
Jack's poetry had no basic form for him to perform variations (riffs) on. >>
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded... much the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
This is a response to the post seen at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=660030815#660030815
Okay, you probably know that I don't mind being compared with Jack Kerouac.
I wasn't comparing you to Kerouac
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
Zod wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
Fantastic quote about the Jack Kerouac writing method, which is still used by poets to this day, for example, John Darnielle of the Mountain Goats:
"Cold At Night" / The Mountain Goats
***
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism (Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same thing.
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of the musical piece.
Jack's poetry had no basic form for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded... much the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
This is a response to the post seen at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=660030815#660030815
Okay, you probably know that I don't mind being compared with Jack Kerouac. >>
I wasn't comparing you to Kerouac
Okay, thst would be high praise indeed, of course, if you were
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
Zod wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
Fantastic quote about the Jack Kerouac writing method, which is still used by poets to this day, for example, John Darnielle of the Mountain Goats:
"Cold At Night" / The Mountain Goats
***
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of the musical piece.
Jack's poetry had no basic form for him to perform variations (riffs) on. >>
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded... much the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
This is a response to the post seen at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=660030815#660030815
Okay, you probably know that I don't mind being compared with Jack Kerouac.
I wasn't comparing you to Kerouac
Okay, thst would be high praise indeed, of course, if you were
Unfortunately, for you, I'm sure that it would.
Will Dockery wrote:
Zod wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
WillDockery wrote:
Zod wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
Zod wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Just because your slurp-puppet slurps your post, doesn't make magically make it true, Donkey.
As I stated earlier:
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism (Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same thing.
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic form for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded... much the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
Agreed.
Will Dockery wrote:
Zod wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
Zod wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Just becaue
doesn't make magically make it true, Donkey.
As I stated earlier:
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism (Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same thing.
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic form for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded... much the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
Agreed.
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
Zod wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
Zod wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Just becaue
doesn't make magically make it true, Donkey.
Just as your whining about it doesn't make anything true, either.
As I stated earlier:
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism (Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same thing.
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic form for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded... much the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
Agreed.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Just becaue
doesn't make magically make it true, Donkey.
Just as your whining about it doesn't make anything true, either.
As I stated earlier:
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism (Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same thing. >>
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic form for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded... much the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
Agreed.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Just becaue
doesn't make magically make it true, Donkey.
Just as your whining about it doesn't make anything true, either.
As I stated earlier:
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism (Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same thing.
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic form for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded... much the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
Agreed.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection
Just because you have a few jazz records doesn't meN you understand them like Jack Kerouac did.
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Just becaue
doesn't make magically make it true, Donkey.
Just as your whining about it doesn't make anything true, either.
As I stated earlier:
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism (Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same thing.
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic form for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded... much the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
Agreed.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection
Just because you have a few jazz records doesn't meN you understand them like Jack Kerouac did.
Will Dockery wrote:I didn't say that I had a "few" records, deceitful Donkey. I said I
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an
afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary
and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a
chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Just becaue
doesn't make magically make it true, Donkey.
Just as your whining about it doesn't make anything true, either.
As I stated earlier:
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism
(Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his
poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same
thing.
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite
variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician
explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of
the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic form
for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic
structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a
verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping
them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the
thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the
variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded... much
the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
Agreed.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else was
talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection
Just because you have a few jazz records doesn't meN you understand
them like Jack Kerouac did.
had "plenty." Louis Armstrong, Ella Fitzgerald, Billie Holiday, Sarah Vaughan, Julie London (complete), Chris Connor (complete), Nancy
Wilson, Peggy Lee, Dinah Washington, Fats Waller (complete), Beverly
Kenney (complete), June Christy, and many others.
I also spent ten years researching music (jazz included) for my two
volume music history book, "Music! Music! Music!"
They're probably not the same jazz that Kerouac was listening to, but
that's of little consequence: Jazz theory is still the same -- jazz is improvisation *within* the structural framework of a musical piece.
Kerouac's statement keeps the improvisation, but ignores that
framework -- which (if he were discussing music) would render the
resulting piece abstract.
Kerouac was using a half-understood tenet of jazz theory and forcing
it to correspond to his work. Again, this is much the same as your
taking half-understood definitions of poetry and forcing them to apply
to your "unspeakable shit."
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an
afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary
and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a
chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Just becaue
doesn't make magically make it true, Donkey.
Just as your whining about it doesn't make anything true, either.
As I stated earlier:
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism
(Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his
poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same
thing.
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite
variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician
explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of
the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic form
for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic
structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a
verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping
them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the
thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the
variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded... much
the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
Agreed.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else was
talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection
Just because you have a few jazz records doesn't meN you understand
them like Jack Kerouac did.
Drunk posting! Or, Will Donkey is thinking about MEN again (is
Jordy's Uncle not man enough for him?).
news:7LKdnWEpUu-T5vz0nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an
afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary
and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a
chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Just becaue
doesn't make magically make it true, Donkey.
Just as your whining about it doesn't make anything true, either.
As I stated earlier:
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism
(Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his
poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same
thing.
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite
variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician
explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of
the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic form
for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic
structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a
verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping
them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the
thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the
variations of Jazz.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else was
talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection.
Just because you have a few jazz records doesn't mean you understand
them like Jack Kerouac did.
Drunk posting
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) wrote in
news:7LKdnWEpUu-T5vz0nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an
afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas
vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway
through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Just becaue
doesn't make magically make it true, Donkey.
Just as your whining about it doesn't make anything true, either.
As I stated earlier:
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism
(Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his
poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same
thing.
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially
infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz
musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the
structure* of the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic form
for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic
structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without
a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses,
stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the
thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to
the variations of Jazz.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else
was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection.
Just because you have a few jazz records doesn't meN you understand
them like Jack Kerouac did.
(Typo corrected.)
Drunk posting! Or, Will Donkey is thinking about MEN again (is
Jordy's Uncle not man enough for him?).
Just a typo, now corrected.
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_BluesJust because you have a few jazz records doesn't mean you understand
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an
afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary
and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a
chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Just becaue
doesn't make magically make it true, Donkey.
Just as your whining about it doesn't make anything true, either.
As I stated earlier:
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism
(Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his
poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same
thing.
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite
variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician
explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of
the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic form
for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic
structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a
verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping
them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the
thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the
variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded... much
the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
Agreed.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else was
talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection
them like Jack Kerouac did.
I think xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote in news:1768003533-3274@newsgrouper.org:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an
afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas
vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway
through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Just becaue
doesn't make magically make it true, Donkey.
Just as your whining about it doesn't make anything true, either.
As I stated earlier:
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism
(Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his
poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same
thing.
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially
infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz
musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the
structure* of the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic form
for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic
structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without
a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses,
stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the
thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to
the variations of Jazz.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else
was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection.
Just because you have a few jazz records doesn't mean you understand
them like Jack Kerouac did.
(Typo corrected.)
Just a typo, now corrected.
I put it back
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_BluesJust because you have a few jazz records doesn't mean you
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an
afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas
vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway
through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Just becaue
doesn't make magically make it true, Donkey.
Just as your whining about it doesn't make anything true, either.
As I stated earlier:
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism
(Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his
poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same
thing.
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially
infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz
musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the
structure* of the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic form
for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic
structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without
a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses,
stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the
thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to
the variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded...
much the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
Agreed.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else
was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection
understand them like Jack Kerouac did.
I think they're pretty fluid when it comes to gender and species down
that way.
You also obsess, lie and misrepresent, Kevin Fries.
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote in news:1768024884-3274@newsgrouper.org:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
You also obsess, lie and misrepresent, Kevin Fries.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_BluesJust because you have a few jazz records doesn't mean you
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an
afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas
vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway
through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially
infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz
musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the
structure* of the musical piece.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic
structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without
a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses,
stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the
thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to
the variations of Jazz.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else
was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection
understand them like Jack Kerouac did.
I think xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxx
You're the proven stalker
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote in
news:1768024884-3274@newsgrouper.org:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
You also obsess, lie and misrepresent, Kevin Fries.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_BluesJust because you have a few jazz records doesn't mean you
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in
an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my
ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from
halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack
Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially
infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A
jazz musician explores those variations -- while *staying
within the structure* of the musical piece.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic
structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example,
without a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses,
stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the
thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than
to the variations of Jazz.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else
was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection
understand them like Jack Kerouac did.
I think they're pretty fluid when it comes to gender and species
down that way.
You're the proven stalker and liar, you change people's words to "misrepresent" what they say and you're a douchebag, douchebag.
Projection noted.
Not really, that's a misrepresentation, Kevin.
Your friend NancyGene is a proven, malicious stalker of multiple
people including my friends and family.
You yourself have threatened to stalk me and my family, Kevin Fries.
That's apparently okay with you, though, Kevin.
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Just becaue
doesn't make magically make it true, Donkey.
Just as your whining about it doesn't make anything true, either.
As I stated earlier:
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism (Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same thing. >>>
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic form for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded... much the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
Agreed.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection
Just because you have a few jazz records doesn't meN you understand them like Jack Kerouac did.
Drunk posting! Or, Will Donkey is thinking about MEN again (is Jordy's Uncle not man enough for him?).
HarryLime wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Just becaue
doesn't make magically make it true, Donkey.
Just as your whining about it doesn't make anything true, either.
As I stated earlier:
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism (Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same thing. >>>>
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic form for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded... much the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
Agreed.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection
Just because you have a few jazz records doesn't meN you understand them like Jack Kerouac did.
Drunk posting! Or, Will Donkey is thinking about MEN again (is Jordy's Uncle not man enough for him?).
I don't think anyone has ever considered Jordy's emoji-pooping Uncle to be manly.
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Just becaue
doesn't make magically make it true, Donkey.
Just as your whining about it doesn't make anything true, either.
As I stated earlier:
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism (Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same thing. >>>>
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic form for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded... much the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
Agreed.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection.
Is there a question mark in the M/F/X category
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Just becaue
doesn't make magically make it true, Donkey.
Just as your whining about it doesn't make anything true, either.
As I stated earlier:
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism (Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same thing. >>>>
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic form for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded... much the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
Agreed.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection.
Is there a question mark in the M/F/X category
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an
afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas
vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway
through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Just becaue
doesn't make magically make it true, Donkey.
Just as your whining about it doesn't make anything true,
either.
As I stated earlier:
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism
(Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his
poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the
same thing.
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially
infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz
musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the
structure* of the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic
form for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic
structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without
a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses,
stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the
thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to
the variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded...
much the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
Agreed.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else
was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection.
I have quite a few jazz records in mine as well if that counts.
[...]
Is there a question mark in the M/F/X category
Look who's talking, NancyGene an anonymous troll who claims to be
female.
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote in news:1768146792-3274@newsgrouper.org:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an
afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas
vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway
through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else
was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection.
I have quite a few jazz records in mine as well if that counts.
[...]
you claim to be a poet, musician
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Just becaue
doesn't make magically make it true, Donkey.
Just as your whining about it doesn't make anything true, either.
As I stated earlier:
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism (Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same thing. >>>>>
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic form for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded... much the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
Agreed.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection
Just because you have a few jazz records doesn't meN you understand them like Jack Kerouac did.
Drunk posting! Or, Will Donkey is thinking about MEN again (is Jordy's Uncle not man enough for him?).
I don't think anyone has ever considered Jordy's emoji-pooping Uncle to be manly.
Is there a question mark in the M/F/X category on Uncle Jordy's drivers license?
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote in
news:1768146792-3274@newsgrouper.org:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in
an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my
ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from
halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack
Kerouac
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what
else was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection.
I have quite a few jazz records in mine as well if that counts.
[...]
Big deal, you claim to be a poet, musician and talented. Even if NG
turns out not to be female[1], you're at least two up on the "what
you're not" category. Douchebags are also checking the boxes for
"inbred" and "not human" so that's at least 4 points and almost
certainly 5 points!
You lose again, Douchebag!
That's correct.
[1] Just how fucking stupid are you, Douchebag?
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection
Just because you have a few jazz records doesn't mean you understand them like Jack Kerouac did.
Is there a question mark in the M/F/X category
Jordy's Uncle has gender confusion
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1768146792-3274@newsgrouper.org:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an
afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas
vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway
through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Just becaue
doesn't make magically make it true, Donkey.
Just as your whining about it doesn't make anything true,
either.
As I stated earlier:
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism
(Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his
poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the
same thing.
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially
infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz
musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the
structure* of the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic
form for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic
structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without
a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses,
stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the
thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to
the variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded...
much the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
Agreed.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else
was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection.
I have quite a few jazz records in mine as well if that counts.
[...]
Is there a question mark in the M/F/X category
Look who's talking, NancyGene an anonymous troll who claims to be
female.
Big deal, you claim to be a poet, musician and talented. Even if NG turns
out not to be female[1], you're at least two up on the "what you're not" category. Douchebags are also checking the boxes for "inbred" and "not
human" so that's at least 4 points and almost certainly 5 points!
You lose again, Douchebag!
[1] Just how f***ing stupid are you, Douchebag?
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1768146792-3274@newsgrouper:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an
afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas
vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway
through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else
was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection.
I have quite a few jazz records in mine as well if that counts.
[...]
Is there a question mark in the M/F/X category
Look who's talking, NancyGene an anonymous troll who claims to be
female.
We are sure of our gender
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote in news:1768146792-3274@newsgrouper.org:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in
an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my
ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from
halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack
Kerouac
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what
else was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection.
I have quite a few jazz records in mine as well if that counts.
[...]
you claim to be a poet, musician
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Just becaue
doesn't make magically make it true, Donkey.
Just as your whining about it doesn't make anything true, either.
As I stated earlier:
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism (Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same thing.
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic form for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded... much the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
Agreed.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection
Just because you have a few jazz records doesn't mean you understand them like Jack Kerouac did.
I don't think anyone has ever considered Jordy's emoji-pooping Uncle to be manly.
Is there a question mark in the M/F/X category
Jordy's Uncle has gender confusion
Will Dockery wrote:
Zod wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack KerouacCheck this out:
https://www.grin.com/document/12330
"Carl Sandburg was one of the first white writers who treated jazz in his poetry and is considered one of the pioneers of jazz related poetry... SandburgrCOs most popular jazz related poem is rCLJazz FantasiarCY, included in Smoke and Steel (1920)..."
Are you saying that writing "jazz related poetry" is what makes one a "jazz poet"?
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
This method produced some spectacular poetry.
Some of the best of all time...
Just becaue
doesn't make magically make it true, Donkey.
Just as your whining about it doesn't make anything true, either.
As I stated earlier:
More mental masturbation from Jack.
He has no more understanding of Jazz than he has of Buddhism (Dharma), but nevertheless gets off on applying it to his poetry/lifestyle.
I can see why he's your idol, as you're constantly doing the same thing.
Jazz is based upon the concept that there are potentially infinite variations within the framework of a given song. A jazz musician explores those variations -- while *staying within the structure* of the musical piece.
Like your own "unspeakable sh*t," Jack's poetry had no basic form for him to perform variations (riffs) on.
In order to have 242 choruses, you need to first have a basic structure or form. You can't have a chorus, for example, without a verse.
His description of pursuing ideas over multiple choruses, stopping them in mid-chorus, etc., sounds more akin to the thought-fragment/word association process of Fragmentism than to the variations of Jazz.
He just liked the way that the label of "Jazz poet" sounded... much the same way that you like calling yourself a poet.
Agreed.
Jack Kerouac was an avid jazz fan so I think he knew what else was talking about.
You're a Pat Boone fan, which has far less credibility.
I've got plenty of jazz records in my collection
Just because you have a few jazz records doesn't mean you understand them like Jack Kerouac did.
"We corrected our error."
I don't think anyone has ever considered Jordy's emoji-pooping Uncle to be manly.
Is there a question mark in the M/F/X category
Is there one on yours?
Jordy's Uncle has gender confusion
Again, like an anonymous troll like you had any room to criticize someone else's gender identity.
For all we know, you're really just an old man pretending to be "Nancy Gene."
WillDockery wrote:
Michael Pendrago wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
Zod wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
Check this out:
https://www.grin.com/document/12330
"Carl Sandburg was one of the first white writers who treated jazz in his poetry and is considered one of the pioneers of jazz related poetry... SandburgrCOs most popular jazz related poem is rCLJazz FantasiarCY, included in Smoke and Steel (1920)..."
Are you saying that writing "jazz related poetry" is what makes one a "jazz poet"?
That is definitely one aspect of Jazz poetry.
Zod wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
Zod wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
HarryLime wrote:
WillDockery wrote:
Michael Pendrago wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
Zod wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
Check this out:
https://www.grin.com/document/12330
"Carl Sandburg was one of the first white writers who treated jazz in his poetry and is considered one of the pioneers of jazz related poetry... SandburgrCOs most popular jazz related poem is rCLJazz FantasiarCY, included in Smoke and Steel (1920)..."
Are you saying that writing "jazz related poetry" is what makes one a "jazz poet"?
That is definitely one aspect of Jazz poetry.
You've no idea what jazz or poetry are, have you?
Will-Dockery wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
WillDockery wrote:
Michael Pendrago wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
Zod wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
Check this out:
https://www.grin.com/document/12330
"Carl Sandburg was one of the first white writers who treated jazz in his poetry and is considered one of the pioneers of jazz related poetry... SandburgrCOs most popular jazz related poem is rCLJazz FantasiarCY, included in Smoke and Steel (1920)..."
Are you saying that writing "jazz related poetry" is what makes one a "jazz poet"?
That is definitely one aspect of Jazz poetry.
You've no idea what jazz or poetry are, have you?
I know quite a bit about both, having been a fan of both for over 50 years.
I've been reading and listening to, and sometimes performing, poetry backed with jazz since at least 1973, when I first began reading Jack Kerouac and the other Beat Generation poets.
As shown earlier, here's one of my vinyl records of Jack Kerouac reading poetry backed by jazz musicians.
See JLA Forums attachment below.
NancyGene wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
WillDockery wrote:
Michael Pendrago wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
Zod wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
Check this out:
https://www.grin.com/document/12330
"Carl Sandburg was one of the first white writers who treated jazz in his poetry and is considered one of the pioneers of jazz related poetry... SandburgrCOs most popular jazz related poem is rCLJazz FantasiarCY, included in Smoke and Steel (1920)..."
Are you saying that writing "jazz related poetry" is what makes one a "jazz poet"?
That is definitely one aspect of Jazz poetry.
You've no idea what jazz or poetry are, have you?
I know quite a bit about both, having been a fan of both for over 50 years. >>
I've been reading and listening to, and sometimes performing, poetry backed with jazz since at least 1973, when I first began reading Jack Kerouac and the other Beat Generation poets.
As shown earlier, here's one of my vinyl records of Jack Kerouac reading poetry backed by jazz musicians.
See JLA Forums attachment below.
That's one of the records that should be in the trash at the side of the hovel.
Will-Dockery wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
WillDockery wrote:
Michael Pendrago wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
Zod wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
Check this out:
https://www.grin.com/document/12330
"Carl Sandburg was one of the first white writers who treated jazz in his poetry and is considered one of the pioneers of jazz related poetry... SandburgrCOs most popular jazz related poem is rCLJazz FantasiarCY, included in Smoke and Steel (1920)..."
Are you saying that writing "jazz related poetry" is what makes one a "jazz poet"?
That is definitely one aspect of Jazz poetry.
You've no idea what jazz or poetry are, have you?
I know quite a bit about both, having been a fan of both for over 50 years. >>>
I've been reading and listening to, and sometimes performing, poetry backed with jazz since at least 1973, when I first began reading Jack Kerouac and the other Beat Generation poets.
As shown earlier, here's one of my vinyl records of Jack Kerouac reading poetry backed by jazz musicians.
See JLA Forums attachment below.
That's one of the records that should be in the trash at the side of the hovel.
It's a beautiful box set of the four jazz poetry albums Jack Kerouac recorded in the late 50s.
Worth a "pretty penny," actually.
HTH and HAND.
Here's the one he recommended in collaboration with pianist Steve Allen, see JLA Forums attachment below.
Will-Dockery wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
WillDockery wrote:
Michael Pendrago wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
Zod wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
Check this out:
https://www.grin.com/document/12330
"Carl Sandburg was one of the first white writers who treated jazz in his poetry and is considered one of the pioneers of jazz related poetry... SandburgrCOs most popular jazz related poem is rCLJazz FantasiarCY, included in Smoke and Steel (1920)..."
Are you saying that writing "jazz related poetry" is what makes one a "jazz poet"?
That is definitely one aspect of Jazz poetry.
You've no idea what jazz or poetry are, have you?
I know quite a bit about both, having been a fan of both for over 50 years. >>>
I've been reading and listening to, and sometimes performing, poetry backed with jazz since at least 1973, when I first began reading Jack Kerouac and the other Beat Generation poets.
As shown earlier, here's one of my vinyl records of Jack Kerouac reading poetry backed by jazz musicians.
See JLA Forums attachment below.
That's one of the records that should be in the trash at the side of the hovel.
It's a beautiful box set of the four jazz poetry albums Jack Kerouac recorded in the late 50s.
Worth a "pretty penny," actually.
HTH and HAND.
Here's the one he recommended in collaboration with pianist Steve Allen, see JLA Forums attachment below.
HarryLime wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
WillDockery wrote:
Michael Pendrago wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
Zod wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
Check this out:
https://www.grin.com/document/12330
"Carl Sandburg was one of the first white writers who treated jazz in his poetry and is considered one of the pioneers of jazz related poetry... SandburgrCOs most popular jazz related poem is rCLJazz FantasiarCY, included in Smoke and Steel (1920)..."
Are you saying that writing "jazz related poetry" is what makes one a "jazz poet"?
That is definitely one aspect of Jazz poetry.
You've no idea what jazz or poetry are, have you?
I know quite a bit about both, having been a fan of both for over 50 years.
I've been reading and listening to, and sometimes performing, poetry backed with jazz since at least 1973, when I first began reading Jack Kerouac and the other Beat Generation poets.
As shown earlier, here's one of my vinyl records of Jack Kerouac reading poetry backed by jazz musicians.
See JLA Forums attachment below.
That's one of the records that should be in the trash at the side of the hovel.
It's a beautiful box set of the four jazz poetry albums Jack Kerouac recorded in the late 50s.
Worth a "pretty penny," actually.
HTH and HAND.
Here's the one he recommended in collaboration with pianist Steve Allen, see JLA Forums attachment below.
The 4 record box set is a 1990 re-issue by Rhino Records
It's the original album put out by Dot records that fetches the big money.
Zod wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
Will-Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
***
CC: Harry Lime, here's the box for my copies of the Jack Kerouac Collection, the 1990 reissue. Definitely an educational set of albums for understanding jazz poetry.
You can probably find examples from it on YouTube.
HarryLime wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
***
CC: Harry Lime, here's the box for my copies of the Jack Kerouac Collection, the 1990 reissue. Definitely an educational set of albums for understanding jazz poetry.
You can probably find examples from it on YouTube.
FYI: "CC" is an abbreviation for "carbon copy." It's used, figuratively, to show that a copy of an email or text is being sent to someone else.
So "CC: Harry Lime" means that along with this post, you've sent a copy to me via email or text.
As per Kerouac's recordings, they are not an example of "Jazz Poetry." They are an example of poetry set to Jazz music.
Hopefully you can understand the difference.
Will-Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
***
Ping: Harry Lime, here's the box for my copies of the Jack Kerouac Collection, the 1990 reissue. Definitely an educational set of albums for understanding jazz poetry.
You can probably find examples from it on YouTube.
As per Kerouac's recordings, they are not an example of "Jazz Poetry." They are an example of poetry set to Jazz music.
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will-Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
***
Ping: Harry Lime, here's the box for my copies of the Jack Kerouac Collection, the 1990 reissue. Definitely an educational set of albums for understanding jazz poetry.
You can probably find examples from it on YouTube.
As per Kerouac's recordings, they are not an example of "Jazz Poetry." They are an example of poetry set to Jazz music.
Have you actually listened to the Jack Kerouac recordings?
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will-Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
***
Ping: Harry Lime, here's the box for my copies of the Jack Kerouac Collection, the 1990 reissue. Definitely an educational set of albums for understanding jazz poetry.
You can probably find examples from it on YouTube.
As per Kerouac's recordings, they are not an example of "Jazz Poetry." They are an example of poetry set to Jazz music.
Have you actually listened to the Jack Kerouac recordings?
A few.
Steve Allen does a nice job on piano. He almost saves the album.
Kerouac does
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will-Dockery wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_City_Blues
"I want to be considered a jazz poet, blowing a long blues in an afternoon jam session on Sunday. I take 242 choruses; my ideas vary and sometimes roll from chorus to chorus or from halfway through a chorus to halfway into the next." -Jack Kerouac
***
Ping: Harry Lime, here's the box for my copies of the Jack Kerouac Collection, the 1990 reissue. Definitely an educational set of albums for understanding jazz poetry.
You can probably find examples from it on YouTube.
As per Kerouac's recordings, they are not an example of "Jazz Poetry." They are an example of poetry set to Jazz music.
Have you actually listened to the Jack Kerouac recordings?
A few.
Steve Allen does a nice job on piano. He almost saves the album.
Kerouac does a piss poor job of reading them.
Writing-wise, they come across as overwritten high school fiction.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 54 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 12:20:28 |
| Calls: | 742 |
| Files: | 1,218 |
| D/L today: |
2 files (2,024K bytes) |
| Messages: | 183,175 |
| Posted today: | 1 |