Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
Still Life 2026, see attachment at JLA Forums)
Dirty coffee mug
Not dirty, just stained by coffee.
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
Still Life 2026, see attachment at JLA Forums)
Dirty coffee mug
Not dirty, just stained by coffee.
That table is worth about $1...or good for firewood.
Will-Dockery wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
Still Life 2026, see attachment at JLA Forums)
Dirty coffee mug
Not dirty, just stained by coffee.
That table is worth about $1...or good for firewood.
A mahogany coffee table over 100 years old, and it isn't for sale.
NancyGene wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
Still Life 2026, see attachment at JLA Forums)
Dirty coffee mug
Not dirty, just stained by coffee.
That table is worth about $1...or good for firewood.
A mahogany coffee table over 100 years old, and it isn't for sale.
In bad condition, obviously cared for as well as the inside and outside of your hovel. Junk.
Will-Dockery wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted: >>>>>
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
Still Life 2026, see attachment at JLA Forums)
Dirty coffee mug
Not dirty, just stained by coffee.
That table is worth about $1...or good for firewood.
A mahogany coffee table over 100 years old, and it isn't for sale.
In bad condition, obviously cared for as well as the inside and outside of your hovel. Junk.
The table is in excellent condition.
I'll post more photos later.
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
Still Life 2026, see attachment at JLA Forums)
Dirty coffee mug
Not dirty, just stained by coffee.
That table is worth about $1...or good for firewood.
A mahogany coffee table over 100 years old, and it isn't for sale.
In bad condition, obviously cared for as well as the inside and outside of your hovel. Junk.
The table is in excellent condition.
I'll post more photos later.
That table is completely trashed.
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
Still Life 2026, see attachment at JLA Forums)
Dirty coffee mug
Not dirty, just stained by coffee.
That table is worth about $1...or good for firewood.
A mahogany coffee table over 100 years old, and it isn't for sale.
In bad condition, obviously cared for as well as the inside and outside of your hovel. Junk.
The table is in excellent condition.
I'll post more photos later.
That table is completely trashed.
Absolutely not.
The table is in great condition.
I'll post more photos later.
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
Part two:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
The old green towel on the old brown chair is a Deep South
decorating touch.
Green?
The towel appears to be a dark green on our new HP monitor.
Blue.
Maybe it used to be blue but now it's green
I've never pretended to be rich.
That's a good thing
Given that you're a deadbeat father
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
Still Life 2026, see attachment at JLA Forums)
Dirty coffee mug
Not dirty, just stained by coffee.
That table is worth about $1...or good for firewood.
A mahogany coffee table over 100 years old, and it isn't for sale.
In bad condition, obviously cared for as well as the inside and outside of your hovel. Junk.
The table is in excellent condition.
I'll post more photos later.
That table is completely trashed.
Absolutely not.
The table is in great condition.
I'll post more photos later.
The table is in great condition... for something pulled out of a dumpster.
Disgustingly filthy, of course (What's that bug-like thing plastered down in the corner?), but I'm assuming it's still got all four legs.
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
Still Life 2026, see attachment at JLA Forums)
Dirty coffee mug
Not dirty, just stained by coffee.
That table is worth about $1...or good for firewood.
A mahogany coffee table over 100 years old, and it isn't for sale.
In bad condition, obviously cared for as well as the inside and outside of your hovel. Junk.
The table is in excellent condition.
I'll post more photos later.
That table is completely trashed.
Absolutely not.
The table is in great condition.
I'll post more photos later.
The table is in great condition... for something pulled out of a dumpster.
There is no proof that it has 4 legs, as it may be propped up by a stack of old paperbacks.
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
Still Life 2026, see attachment at JLA Forums)
Dirty coffee mug
Not dirty, just stained by coffee.
That table is worth about $1...or good for firewood.
A mahogany coffee table over 100 years old, and it isn't for sale.
In bad condition, obviously cared for as well as the inside and outside of your hovel. Junk.
The table is in excellent condition.
I'll post more photos later.
That table is completely trashed.
Absolutely not.
The table is in great condition.
I'll post more photos later.
The table is in great condition... for something pulled out of a dumpster.
There is no proof that it has 4 legs, as it may be propped up by a stack of old paperbacks.
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
Part two:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
The old green towel on the old brown chair is a Deep South
decorating touch.
Green?
The towel appears to be a dark green on our new HP monitor.
Blue.
Maybe it used to be blue but now it's green
Again, untrue.
I've never pretended to be rich.
That's a good thing, Douchebag.
Sure, I agree.
Given that you're a deadbeat father, I doubt you would be able to
pull that off anyway.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
Part two:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
The old green towel on the old brown chair is a Deep South
decorating touch.
Green?
The towel appears to be a dark green on our new HP monitor.
Blue.
Maybe it used to be blue but now it's green
Again, untrue.
I didn't write that
This is why you
I've never pretended to be rich.
That's a good thing
Sure, I agree< CujoDeSockpuppet, you stalking troll, you.
Given that you're a deadbeat father
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court records
Will-Dockery wrote:
Miguel Sucio wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Miguel Sucio wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Here's my living room, Cujo, since you're so fascinated.
EfyA
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
It looks like
Obsessive much, Miguel?
You post a picture of a corner of your living room, I reply with my opinion and that makes me the stalker????
You reply to EVERYTHING I post, Miguel.
That's pretty obsessive.
EfOe
Will-Dockery wrote:
Miguel Sucio wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Miguel Sucio wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Here's my living room, Cujo, since you're so fascinated.
EfyA
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
It looks like
Obsessive much, Miguel?
You post a picture of a corner of your living room, I reply with my
opinion and that makes me the stalker????
You reply to EVERYTHING I post, Miguel.
That's pretty obsessive.
EfOe
Your lie is noted, unless you can find a post count to back up your ridiculous claim. You have been the top poster to AARP every month
for years. If your lie is true, my post count should be as high as
yours. Add that to the Lies Dockery has Made but Can't Prove list.
By the way, Top Poster is only a number not a measure of quality.
Everything you post lacks substance or thought. Your mindless "Hi
Jordy" posts alone far outnumber my post count.
View the attachments for this post at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=700165721#700165721
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote in news:1767033992-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Part two:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
[...]
I've never pretended to be rich.
That's a good thing
It's the truth, whether good or bad.
You did a great job pretending to be a musician, poet and a successful artist. I don't see why not!
Given that you're a deadbeat father xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxThat's a false statement, lying cyberbully troll.
Would you like me to contact
Will-Dockery wrote:
Miguel Sucio wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Here's my living room, Cujo, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
It looks like
Obsessive much, Miguel?
You post a picture of a corner of your living room, I reply with my opinion and that makes me the stalker????
You reply to EVERYTHING I post, Miguel.
That's pretty obsessive.
Your lie is noted
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
The old green towel on the old brown chair is a Deep South
decorating touch.
Green?
The towel appears to be a dark green on our new HP monitor.
Blue.
Maybe it used to be blue but now it's green
Again, untrue.
I've never pretended to be rich.
That's a good thing
Sure, I agree.
Given that you're a deadbeat xxxxxxxxxx xxxx xxxxxxxxxx
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court records,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote in
news:1767033992-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Part two:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
[...]
I've never pretended to be rich.
That's a good thing
It's the truth, whether good or bad.
You did a great job pretending to be a musician, poet and a successful
artist. I don't see why not!
Given that you're a deadbeat father xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx
, I doubt you would be able to pull that off anyway.
That's a false statement, lying cyberbully troll.
Would you like me to contact the hellspawn to confirm? Your choice.
I'm sure Joey Stout might feel that way.
CujoDeSockpuppet threatening to stalk a member of my family, noted.
No surprise there.
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
The old green towel on the old brown chair is a Deep South
decorating touch.
Green?
The towel appears to be a dark green on our new HP monitor.
Blue.
Maybe it used to be blue but now it's green
Again, untrue.
I've never pretended to be rich.
That's a good thing
Sure, I agree.
Given that you're a deadbeat deadbeat father, I doubt you would be
able to pull that off anyway.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court records,
Douchebag Dad? Keep snipping and see what happens.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no court records like that.
Second, it would also show you're a stalker if you did find and post
records like that.
But if course you can't post what doesn't exist.
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote in news:1767033992-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Part two:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
[...]
I've never pretended to be rich.
That's a good thing
It's the truth, whether good or bad.
You did a great job pretending to be a musician, poet and a successful
artist. I don't see why not!
Given that you're a deadbeat father xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx
You snipped this:
, I doubt you would be able to pull that off anyway.
Why? It's a statement of personal opinion
That's a false statement, lying cyberbully troll.
That's pretty dishonest
Would you like me to contact the hellspawn to confirm? Your choice.
I'm sure Joey Stout might feel that way.
CujoDeSockpuppet threatening to stalk a member of my family, noted.
No surprise there.
Since you didn't answer my question, I suppose I'll send off an FOIA
request to Muscogee county and the City of Columbus. I'll let you know
when it comes back.
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote in news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Given that you're a deadbeat deadbeat fatherHere's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court records
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
Second, it would also show you're a stalker if you did find and post records like that.
I didn't find anything. It would already exist
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote in news:1767033992-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Part two:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
[...]
Given that you're a deadbeat father xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx
, I doubt you would be able to pull that off anyway.
Why? It's a statement of personal opinion
That's a false statement, lying cyberbully troll.
That's pretty dishonest
Would you like me to contact xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxCujoDeSockpuppet threatening to stalk a member of my family, noted.
No surprise there.
Since you didn't answer my question
I suppose I'll send off an FOIA
request to Muscogee county and the City of Columbus.
I'll let you know
when it comes back. I think the other stalkers are getting a credit
report on you, so I'll skip that.
Will Dockery wrote:
Miguel Sucio wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
Here's my living room, Cujo, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
It looks like
Obsessive much, Miguel?
You post a picture of a corner of your living room, I reply with my opinion and that makes me the stalker????
You reply to EVERYTHING I post, Miguel.
That's pretty obsessive.
Your lie is noted
Miguel Sucio wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet threatening to stalk a member of my family, noted.
No surprise there.
--
https://www.reverbnation.com/dirtymikeandthesafehousehooligans
The real surprise is you crying "Stalker!" when the person you claim they are stalking is a convicted stalker of children. Convicted and jailed. Unfortunately, Joey didn't just limit his pedo activities to just stalking.
Who are you kidding, though? Joey was never a member of your family.
https://www.reverbnation.com/dirtymikeandthesafehousehooligans
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet threatening to stalk a member of my family, noted.
No surprise there.
--
https://www.reverbnation.com/dirtymikeandthesafehousehooligans
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Given that you're a deadbeat father, I doubt you would beHere's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
able to pull that off anyway.
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records,Douchebag Dad? Keep snipping and see what happens.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly? Let me narrow the search down for the sake of the
overworked Gubmint employees.
Whatever you're threatening to stalk about me
Second, it would also show you're a stalker if you did find and
post records like that.
Which don't exist because it didn't happen.
I didn't find anything. It would already exist, you silly Douchebag.
That doesn't quite make sense, CujoDeSockpuppet.
Keep denying it, Douchebag. Joey Stout will be writing back. We'll see
how that works out.
Miguel Sucio wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet threatening to stalk a member of my family, noted.
No surprise there.
--
https://www.reverbnation.com/dirtymikeandthesafehousehooligans
The real surprise is you crying "Stalker!" when the person you claim
they are stalking is a convicted stalker of children. Convicted and
jailed. Unfortunately, Joey didn't just limit his pedo activities to
just stalking. Who are you kidding, though? Joey was never a member
of your family.
https://www.reverbnation.com/dirtymikeandthesafehousehooligans
Joey the Bastard was unwanted and unloved.
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) wrote in news:DICdnQ1AjbAnPcP0nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com:
Miguel Sucio wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet threatening to stalk a member of my family, noted.
No surprise there.
--
https://www.reverbnation.com/dirtymikeandthesafehousehooligans
The real surprise is you crying "Stalker!" when the person you claim
they are stalking is a convicted stalker of children. Convicted and
jailed. Unfortunately, Joey didn't just limit his pedo activities to
just stalking. Who are you kidding, though? Joey was never a member
of your family.
https://www.reverbnation.com/dirtymikeandthesafehousehooligans
Joey the Bastard was unwanted and unloved.
Joey was neglected by a deadbeat father.
--
"Post-editing someone's statement before replying to it is a sure sign that you have already lost the argument." - Little Willie Douchebag gets another asskicking from Pendragon
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) wrote in
news:DICdnQ1AjbAnPcP0nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com:
Miguel Sucio wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet threatening to stalk a member of my family, noted.
No surprise there.
--
https://www.reverbnation.com/dirtymikeandthesafehousehooligans
The real surprise is you crying "Stalker!" when the person you claim
they are stalking is a convicted stalker of children. Convicted and
jailed. Unfortunately, Joey didn't just limit his pedo activities
to just stalking. Who are you kidding, though? Joey was never a
member of your family.
https://www.reverbnation.com/dirtymikeandthesafehousehooligans
Joey the Bastard was unwanted and unloved.
Joey was neglected by a deadbeat father.
Kind of ironic that Joey's last name is Stout, and he is 5'11" and
weighs 25 pounds.
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) wrote in news:ptOcnZ3JrrX8TMP0nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) wrote in
news:DICdnQ1AjbAnPcP0nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com:
Miguel Sucio wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet threatening to stalk a member of my family, noted.
No surprise there.
--
https://www.reverbnation.com/dirtymikeandthesafehousehooligans
The real surprise is you crying "Stalker!" when the person you claim
they are stalking is a convicted stalker of children. Convicted and
jailed. Unfortunately, Joey didn't just limit his pedo activities
to just stalking. Who are you kidding, though? Joey was never a
member of your family.
https://www.reverbnation.com/dirtymikeandthesafehousehooligans
Joey the Bastard was unwanted and unloved.
Joey was neglected by a deadbeat father.
Kind of ironic that Joey's last name is Stout, and he is 5'11" and
weighs 25 pounds.
I can't wait to hear what he has to say about deadbeat fathers.
--
"Post-editing someone's statement before replying to it is a sure sign
that you have already lost the argument." - Little Willie Douchebag gets another asskicking from Pendragon
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) wrote in
news:ptOcnZ3JrrX8TMP0nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) wrote in
news:DICdnQ1AjbAnPcP0nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com:
Miguel Sucio wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet threatening to stalk a member of my family, noted.
No surprise there.
--
https://www.reverbnation.com/dirtymikeandthesafehousehooligans
The real surprise is you crying "Stalker!" when the person you claim
they are stalking is a convicted stalker of children. Convicted and
jailed. Unfortunately, Joey didn't just limit his pedo activities
to just stalking. Who are you kidding, though? Joey was never a
member of your family.
https://www.reverbnation.com/dirtymikeandthesafehousehooligans
Joey the Bastard was unwanted and unloved.
Joey was neglected by a deadbeat father.
Kind of ironic that Joey's last name is Stout, and he is 5'11" and
weighs 25 pounds.
I can't wait to hear what he has to say about deadbeat fathers.
Is Joey singing in prison?
Will Dockery wrote:
No surprise there.
The real surprise is you crying "Stalker!"
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
No surprise there.
The real surprise is you crying "Stalker!" when the person
you claim they are stalking is a convicted stalker of
children. Convicted and jailed. Unfortunately, Joey didn't
just limit his pedo activities to just stalking. Who are you
kidding, though? Joey was never a member of your family.
Just pointing out the obvious.
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote in news:1767838320-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
No surprise there.
The real surprise is you crying "Stalker!"
Just pointing out the obvious.
NG sure did
Miguel Sucio wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet threatening to stalk a member of my family, noted.
No surprise there.
The real surprise is you crying "Stalker!"
Is Joey xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote in news:1767617120-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court records
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) wrote in news:KNGcnYCMMNZhb8P0nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com:
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) wrote in
news:ptOcnZ3JrrX8TMP0nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) wrote in
news:DICdnQ1AjbAnPcP0nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com:
Miguel Sucio wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet threatening to stalk a member of my family, noted.
No surprise there.
--
https://www.reverbnation.com/dirtymikeandthesafehousehooligans
The real surprise is you crying "Stalker!" when the person you claim
they are stalking is a convicted stalker of children. Convicted and
jailed. Unfortunately, Joey didn't just limit his pedo activities
to just stalking. Who are you kidding, though? Joey was never a
member of your family.
https://www.reverbnation.com/dirtymikeandthesafehousehooligans
Joey the Bastard was unwanted and unloved.
Joey was neglected by a deadbeat father.
Kind of ironic that Joey's last name is Stout, and he is 5'11" and
weighs 25 pounds.
I can't wait to hear what he has to say about deadbeat fathers.
Is Joey singing in prison?
Good question! I'll be sure to ask next time.
PS: Amazing what a few bucks in a convict's commissary account will do.
--
"Post-editing someone's statement before replying to it is a sure sign
that you have already lost the argument." - Little Willie Douchebag gets another asskicking from Pendragon
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) wrote in
news:DICdnQ1AjbAnPcP0nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com:
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet threatening to stalk a member of my family, noted.
No surprise there.
--
He could use the bucks
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet threatening to stalk a member of my family, noted.
No surprise there.
The real surprise xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxx
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) wrote in news:DICdnQ1AjbAnPcP0nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com:
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet threatening to stalk a member of my family, noted.
No surprise there.
Joey
Joey
Kind of ironic that Joey
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote in news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Given that you're a
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
You snipped again.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
Let me narrow the search down for the sake of the
overworked Gubmint employees.
Whatever you're threatening to stalk about me
How can you claim stalking without evidence?
Second, it would also show you're a stalker if you did find and
post records like that.
Which don't exist because it didn't happen.
I didn't find anything. It would already exist, you silly Douchebag.
That doesn't quite make sense, CujoDeSockpuppet.
I haven't found anything
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Given that you're a
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
You snipped again.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Given that you're a
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Given that you're a
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Given that you're a
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked.
Words matter. Learn what they mean and how to use them correctly.
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Given that you're a
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked.
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Given that you're a
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked.
has found a word (stalk) and won't give it up, no matter the meaning or context.
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Given that you're a
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked.
Words matter. Learn what they mean and how to use them correctly.
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Given that you're a
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked. >>
Words matter. Learn what they mean and how to use them correctly.
Will Donkey has found a word (stalk) and won't give it up, no matter the meaning or context.
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) wrote in
news:KNGcnYCMMNZhb8P0nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com:
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) wrote
in news:ptOcnZ3JrrX8TMP0nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) wrote
in news:DICdnQ1AjbAnPcP0nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com:
Miguel Sucio wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet threatening to stalk a member of my family, noted.
No surprise there.
--
https://www.reverbnation.com/dirtymikeandthesafehousehooligans
The real surprise is you crying "Stalker!" when the person you claim
they are stalking is a convicted stalker of children. Convicted and
jailed. Unfortunately, Joey didn't just limit his pedo activities
to just stalking. Who are you kidding, though? Joey was never a
member of your family.
https://www.reverbnation.com/dirtymikeandthesafehousehooligans
Joey the Bastard was unwanted and unloved.
Joey was neglected by a deadbeat father.
Kind of ironic that Joey's last name is Stout, and he is 5'11" and
weighs 25 pounds.
I can't wait to hear what he has to say about deadbeat fathers.
Is Joey singing in prison?
Good question! I'll be sure to ask next time.
PS: Amazing what a few bucks in a convict's commissary account will
do.
--
"Post-editing someone's statement before replying to it is a sure
sign that you have already lost the argument." - Little Willie
Douchebag gets another asskicking from Pendragon
He could use the bucks to buy protection, but it may be too late for
that. Joey has lots of "friends" from his benefits.
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Given that you're a
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
You snipped again.
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
Let me narrow the search down for the sake of the
overworked Gubmint employees.
Again, stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet is threatened ^^^
Whatever you're threatening to stalk about me
How can you claim stalking without evidence?
You've stated your intention to stalk me and my family.
Second, it would also show you're a stalker if you did find and
post records like that.
Which don't exist because it didn't happen.
I didn't find anything. It would already exist, you silly
Douchebag.
That doesn't quite make sense, CujoDeSockpuppet.
I haven't found anything
So you admit to stalking.
At least you admit it.
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Given that you're a
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked. >>
Again, court records are found by stalking a person.
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Given that you're a
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or
harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a
reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of
express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed
at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms,
annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a
*person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be
stalked.
Again, court records are found by stalking a person.
Good Donkey.
You said it correctly this time.
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other
than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Given that you're a
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked.
Again, court records are found by stalking a person.
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Given that you're a xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always< CujoDeSockpuppet.
I guess that means I have your permission
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk|e-+|o-C-iing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or
harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a
reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of
express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed
at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms,
annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a
*person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be
stalked.
Again, court records are found by stalking a person.
You said it correctly this time.
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other
than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
But if there are no court records, as xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx claims, then how
can you stalk something that doesn't exist and for which there are no provable actions?
Will-Dockery wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Given that you're a
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.* >>>>
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked.
Again, court records are found by stalking a person.
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look up my court records except for stalking.
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxx
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.* >>>>
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked.
Again, court records are found by stalking a person.
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you have
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Given that you're a xxxxx xxxxx
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.* >>>>>
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked.
Again, court records are found by stalking a person.
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you have
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Given that you're a
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or
harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a
reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of
express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed
at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms,
annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a
*person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be
stalked.
Again, court records are found by stalking a person.
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other
than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look up
my court records except for stalking.
NancyGene wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Given that you're a
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.* >>>>>
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked.
Again, court records are found by stalking a person.
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you have, Will Donkey, and in what states, cities and counties?
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in news:QHSdnZ585MvTLP30nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons otherGiven that you're xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxAgain, court records are found by stalking a person.
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk|e-+|o-C-iing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or
harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a
reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of
express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed
at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms,
annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a
*person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be
stalked.
than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look up
my court records except for stalking.
But you claimed you didn't have any court records
NancyGene wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted: >>>>>
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in >>>>>> news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Given that you're a
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.* >>>>>>
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked.
Again, court records are found by stalking a person.
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you have, Will Donkey, and in what states, cities and counties?
Let's see...Georgia of course, Alabama, Florida. We don't think that Will Donkey has been in any other states, walking hundreds of miles not being his forte.
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
Given that you're xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
Permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.* >>>>>
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked.
Again, court records are found by stalking a person.
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you have,
Let's see...Georgia of course, Alabama, Florida.
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
Given that you're xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no. >>>>>>
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
Permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no >>>>>> court records like that.Again, court records are found by stalking a person.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.* >>>>>>
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you have
Let's see...Georgia of course, Alabama, Florida
IIRC, he caught a ride to Texas for
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:QHSdnZ585MvTLP30nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasonsGiven that you're xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxAgain, court records are found by stalking a person.
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends,
no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk|e-+|o-C-iing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or
harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a
reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of
express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct
directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and
seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a
*person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot
be stalked.
other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look
up my court records except for stalking.
But you claimed you didn't have any court records, Douchebag.
Even if I did, why would they be your business, stalker?
NG never said anything about it. But you had to drag her name into
it?
Is there any chance you could knock off the Drama Queen act until
Joey's reply gets back to me, Deadbeat Douchebag Dad?
The FOIA requests will be back soon enough. Be patient.
Do you have an issue with FOIA requests? What do you have against
patriotic citizens tring to get to the truth, you anti-American
scumbag?
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote
in news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
^^^
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
^^^
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxx
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends,
no.
^^^
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
^^^
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or
harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a
reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of
express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct
directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and
seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a
*person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot
be stalked.
If course not.
Again, court records are found by stalking a person.
This ^^^
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons
other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
I don't know any reason a malicious troll would look for such
information unless they are stalking the person, trying to find
negative information about them.
NancyGene has made no secret of her stalking of me and others here
over the years.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look
up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you have
I don't know, I've never really looked.
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote
in news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxx
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends,
no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
Permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk|e-+|o-C-iing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or
harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a
reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of
express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct
directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and
seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a
*person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot
be stalked.
If course not.
Again, court records are found by stalking a person.
This ^^^
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons
other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
I don't know any reason a malicious troll would look for such
information unless they are stalking the person, trying to find
negative information about them.
NancyGene has made no secret of her stalking of me and others here
over the years.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look
up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you have
I don't know, I've never really looked.
Then how did you claim there weren't any to find
How is inquiring about public records stalking
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in news:QHSdnZ585MvTLP30nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
Given that you're xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends,
no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
Permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are noAgain, court records are found by stalking a person.
court records like that.
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk|a-e|e-+|a-o|e-C|e-iing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or
harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a
reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of
express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct
directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and
seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a
*person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot
be stalked.
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons
other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look
up my court records except for stalking.
But you claimed you didn't have any court records
Even if I did, why would they be your business, stalker?
To prove you're a liar
HarryLime wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted: >>>>>>
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in >>>>>>> news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Given that you're a
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no. >>>>>>>
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no >>>>>>> court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.* >>>>>>>
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked.
Again, court records are found by stalking a person.
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you have, Will Donkey, and in what states, cities and counties?
Let's see...Georgia of course, Alabama, Florida. We don't think that Will Donkey has been in any other states, walking hundreds of miles not being his forte.
IIRC, he caught a ride to Texas for Barfly's funeral.
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted: >>>>>>>
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted: >>>>>>>> Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in >>>>>>>> news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Given that you're a
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no. >>>>>>>>
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no >>>>>>>> court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.* >>>>>>>>
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked.
Again, court records are found by stalking a person.
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you have, Will Donkey, and in what states, cities and counties?
Let's see...Georgia of course, Alabama, Florida. We don't think that Will Donkey has been in any other states, walking hundreds of miles not being his forte.
IIRC, he caught a ride to Texas for Barfly's funeral.
Dan Barfly's service was in Savannah, not Texas, which would have barbecued him. We think that the Pastor of the Church of the Holy Barbers drove him and Barfly's ex-wife to Savannah.
HarryLime wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (NancyGene) posted: >>>>>>>>
HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted: >>>>>>>>> Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in >>>>>>>>> news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Here's my living room, since you're so fascinated.
(See attachment at JLA Forums)
Given that you're a
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no. >>>>>>>>>
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no >>>>>>>>> court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked.
Again, court records are found by stalking a person.
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you have, Will Donkey, and in what states, cities and counties?
Let's see...Georgia of course, Alabama, Florida. We don't think that Will Donkey has been in any other states, walking hundreds of miles not being his forte.
IIRC, he caught a ride to Texas for Barfly's funeral.
Dan Barfly's service was in Savannah, not Texas, which would have barbecued him. We think that the Pastor of the Church of the Holy Barbers drove him and Barfly's ex-wife to Savannah.
Okay. Scratch Texas from the list of states the Donkey has been to.
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:QHSdnZ585MvTLP30nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
Given that you're xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Here ^^^
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Here ^^^
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
Here ^^^
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends,
no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
Permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
Here ^^^
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there areAgain, court records are found by stalking a person.
no court records like that.
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk|a-e|e-+|a-o|e-C|e-iing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following
or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause
a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially
because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct
directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and
seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a
*person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record
cannot be stalked.
^^^
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons
other than stalking, but at least you're using the word
correctly.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to
look up my court records except for stalking.
^^^
But you claimed you didn't have any court records, Douchebag!
None that would support your lying and false statements and
accusations, Kevin Fries.
Even if I did, why would they be your business, stalker?
To prove you're a liar
So when you find out otherwise, you'll put an apology to me here,
Kevin Fries?
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote
in news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
^^^
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxx
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends,
no.
^^^
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
^^^
Permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are
no court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk|e-+|o-C-iing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following
or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause
a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially
because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct
directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and
seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a
*person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record
cannot be stalked.
If course not.
Again, court records are found by stalking a person.
This ^^^
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons
other than stalking, but at least you're using the word
correctly.
I don't know any reason a malicious troll would look for such
information unless they are stalking the person, trying to find
negative information about them.
NancyGene has made no secret of her stalking of me and others here
over the years.
For instance, NG's stalking of Stephan Pickering, Vinyl Cat and Zod,
to name three.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to
look up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you have
Stalker type question noted ^^^
I don't know, I've never really looked.
Then how did you claim there weren't any to find
Because you were making false statements and accusations about me, fur starters, Kevin.
How is inquiring about public records stalking
If I did the same about "Kevin Fries" you wouldn't say I was stalking?
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
Given that you're a
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.Again, that's a lie and a false statement.Again, court records are found by stalking a perso
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no. >>>>>>>>
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no >>>>>>>> court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you havr
Let's see...Georgia of course, Alabama, Florida
IIRC, he caught a ride to Texas
Dan Bxxxxx service was in Savannah, not Texas
Okay. Scratch Texas
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
Given that you're a
[False information removed]
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked. >> Again, court records are found by stalking a perso
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you havr
Stalker question noted.
Let's see...Georgia of course, Alabama, Florida
IIRC, he caught a ride to Texas
Dan Bxxxxx service was in Savannah, not Texas
Okay. Scratch Texas
Leave it to the obsessive stalker NancyGene to catch that.
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
Given that you're a
[False information removed]
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked.
Again, court records are found by stalking a perso
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you havr
Stalker question noted.
Let's see...Georgia of course, Alabama, Florida
IIRC, he caught a ride to Texas
Dan Barfield's service was in Savannah, not Texas
Okay. Scratch Texas
Leave it to the obsessive stalker NancyGene to catch that
So what other states/countries have you been
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote
in news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
^^^
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxx
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends,
no.
^^^
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
^^^
Permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are
no court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk|a-e|e-+|a-o|e-C|e-iing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following
or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause
a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially
because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct
directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and
seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a
*person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record
cannot be stalked.
If course not.
Again, court records are found by stalking a person.
This ^^^
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons
other than stalking, but at least you're using the word
correctly.
I don't know any reason a malicious troll would look for such
information unless they are stalking the person, trying to find
negative information about them.
NancyGene has made no secret of her stalking of me and others here
over the years.
For instance, NG's stalking of Stephan Pickering, Vinyl Cat and Zod,
to name three.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to
look up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you have
Stalker type question noted ^^^
I don't know, I've never really looked.
Then how did you claim there weren't any to find
Because you were making false statements and accusations about me, fur starters, Kevin.
How is inquiring about public records stalking
If I did the same about "Kevin Fries" you wouldn't say I was stalking?
You already have
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote
in news:osOdnZl_Ae08Lc_0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from
court records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
^^^
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as
always.
I guess that means I have your xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxx
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and
friends, no.
^^^
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
^^^
Permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there
are no court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk|a-e|e-+|a-o|e-C|e-iing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly
following or harassing another person in circumstances
that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or
death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct
directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and
seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against
a *person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record
cannot be stalked.
If course not.
Again, court records are found by stalking a person.
This ^^^
Of course one can look up someone's court records for
reasons other than stalking, but at least you're using the
word correctly.
I don't know any reason a malicious troll would look for such
information unless they are stalking the person, trying to find
negative information about them.
NancyGene has made no secret of her stalking of me and others
here over the years.
For instance, NG's stalking of Stephan Pickering, Vinyl Cat and
Zod, to name three.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to
look up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you have
Stalker type question noted ^^^
I don't know, I've never really looked.
Then how did you claim there weren't any to find
Because you were making false statements and accusations about me,
fur starters, Kevin.
How is inquiring about public records stalking
If I did the same about "Kevin Fries" you wouldn't say I was
stalking?
You already have, you lying Douchebag. After I proved it, you started
claiming everyone else was stalking you to hide that you were caught
stalking.
That's not really true.
I haven't searched any personal or court records for "Kevin Fries."
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
Given that you're a
[False information removed]
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked. >> Again, court records are found by stalking a perso
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you havr
How does a Donkey snip something but put a wrong letter in it too? We did not say "havr." We said, "How many court records do you have, Will Donkey, and in what states, cities and counties?" Where did the "r" come from?
Stalker question noted.
Let's see...Georgia of course, Alabama, Florida
IIRC, he caught a ride to Texas
Dan Barfly's service was in Savannah, not Texas
Okay. Scratch Texas
Leave it to the obsessive stalker NancyGene to catch that.
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
Given that you're a
[False information removed]
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked.
Again, court records are found by stalking a perso
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you havr
How does a Donkey snip something but put a wrong letter in it too? We did not say "havr." We said, "How many court records do you have, Will Donkey, and in what states, cities and counties?" Where did the "r" come from?
Stalker question noted.
Let's see...Georgia of course, Alabama, Florida
IIRC, he caught a ride to Texas
Dan Barfly's service was in Savannah, not Texas
Okay. Scratch Texas
Leave it to the obsessive stalker NancyGene to catch that.
Will Donkey, you posted pictures of the "service." (Is Dan Barfly still dead?) How many more court records do you have that we don't already know about? 1-10, 11-20? More than that? We are sure that you would have had several DUIs if you actually had a car or could fit in a car.
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
Given that you're a
[False information removed]
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or
harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a
reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of
express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed
at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms,
annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a
*person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be
stalked. Again, court records are found by stalking a perso
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other
than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look
up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you havr
How does a Donkey snip something but put a wrong letter in it too?
We did not say "havr." We said, "How many court records do you have,
Will Donkey, and in what states, cities and counties?" Where did the
"r" come from?
Stalker question noted.
Let's see...Georgia of course, Alabama, FloridaLeave it to the obsessive stalker NancyGene to catch that.
IIRC, he caught a ride to Texas
Dan Barfly's service was in Savannah, not Texas
Okay. Scratch Texas
Will Donkey, you posted pictures of the "service." (Is Dan Barfly
still dead?) How many more court records do you have that we don't
already know about? 1-10, 11-20? More than that? We are sure that
you would have had several DUIs if you actually had a car or could fit
in a car.
HarryLime wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
Given that you're a
[False information removed]
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.* >>>>
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked.
Again, court records are found by stalking a perso
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you havr
How does a Donkey snip something but put a wrong letter in it too? We did not say "havr." We said, "How many court records do you have, Will Donkey, and in what states, cities and counties?" Where did the "r" come from?
Stalker question noted.
Let's see...Georgia of course, Alabama, Florida
IIRC, he caught a ride to Texas
Dan Barfly's service was in Savannah, not Texas
Okay. Scratch Texas
Leave it to the obsessive stalker NancyGene to catch that.
Will Donkey, you posted pictures of the "service." (Is Dan Barfly still dead?) How many more court records do you have that we don't already know about? 1-10, 11-20? More than that? We are sure that you would have had several DUIs if you actually had a car or could fit in a car.
Will Donkey was a beanpole when he was young. He probably had dozens of DUIs from his pizza boi days.
HarryLime wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
Given that you're a
[False information removed]
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or
harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a
reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of
express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct
directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and
seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a
*person.*
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot
be stalked. Again, court records are found by stalking a perso
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons
other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look
up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you havr
How does a Donkey snip something but put a wrong letter in it too?
We did not say "havr." We said, "How many court records do you
have, Will Donkey, and in what states, cities and counties?" Where
did the "r" come from?
Stalker question noted.
Let's see...Georgia of course, Alabama, Florida
IIRC, he caught a ride to Texas
Dan Barfly's service was in Savannah, not Texas
Okay. Scratch Texas
Leave it to the obsessive stalker NancyGene to catch that.
Will Donkey, you posted pictures of the "service." (Is Dan Barfly
still dead?) How many more court records do you have that we don't
already know about? 1-10, 11-20? More than that? We are sure that
you would have had several DUIs if you actually had a car or could
fit in a car.
Will Donkey was a beanpole when he was young. He probably had dozens
of DUIs from his pizza boi days.
Some of those convictions would have dropped off of Will Donkey's rap
sheet. More current ones would depend on whether or not DirtNap Dave
had a car/truck and if DND had filled the vehicle with gas. Will
Donkey's "driveway" doesn't look like it has had a visitor in a long
time.
Will Dockery wrote:
mpsilvertone@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (HarryLime) posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1767754624-3274@newsgrouper.org:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
Given that you're a[False information removed]
Again, that's a lie and a false statement.
Why do you lie and misrepresent so much, CujoDeSockpuppet?
Do you really want the facts thrown in your face from court
records
Threat of stalking here ^^^
Again, threats of stalking by CujoDeSockpuppet are noted.
Again, your threat to stalk me is noted.
As CujoDeSockpuppet himself has defined "stalking."
I deleted your lies and misrepresentations, yes, as always.
I guess that means I have your permission. Thanks!
I'm not giving permission to stalk me, my family and friends, no.
Let's make that clear, stalkers.
My permission to stalk me and my family?
No, definitely not.
For starters, you wouldn't be able to do that since there are no
court records like that.
Like what, exactly?
What I was falsely accused of.
The court records you stated that you were going to stalk.
MMP: One doesn't stalk court records
Malicious stalkers do, Pendragon.
Per Merriam-Webster:
stalking
noun
stalk-+rCiing
1 . the act or crime of willfully and repeatedly following or harassing another person in circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or death especially because of express or implied threats
2 . broadly : a crime of engaging in a course of conduct directed at a person that serves no legitimate purpose and seriously alarms, annoys, or intimidates that person
*****
Note that in both definitions, the act is directed against a *person.* >>>>
A court record is not a person. Therefore a court record cannot be stalked.
Again, court records are found by stalking a perso
Of course one can look up someone's court records for reasons other than stalking, but at least you're using the word correctly.
There's no reason NancyGene or CujoDeSockpuppet would have to look up my court records except for stalking.
How many court records do you havr
How does a Donkey snip something but put a wrong letter in it too? We did not say "havr." We said, "How many court records do you have, Will Donkey, and in what states, cities and counties?" Where did the "r" come from?
Stalker question noted.
Let's see...Georgia of course, Alabama, Florida
IIRC, he caught a ride to Texas
Dan service was in Savannah, not Texas
Okay. Scratch Texas
Leave it to the obsessive stalker NancyGene to catch that.
Some of those convictions would have dropped off
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 54 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 13:47:36 |
| Calls: | 742 |
| Files: | 1,218 |
| D/L today: |
3 files (2,681K bytes) |
| Messages: | 183,470 |
| Posted today: | 1 |