• Tories choose far-right negress as leader

    From Nomen Nescio@21:1/5 to All on Sun Nov 3 12:49:55 2024
    who is conflicted?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to nobody@dizum.com on Sun Nov 3 12:46:27 2024
    In article <27286adbf4ca9f563aa97dc560774d30@dizum.com>,
    Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
    who is conflicted?


    Fun.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to Nomen Nescio on Sun Nov 3 19:31:33 2024
    Nomen Nescio wrote:

    who is conflicted?

    Hmmm, interesting topic... that probably deserves to be
    discussed in a more serious place and explored earnestly... by
    adults.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Last Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Sun Nov 3 21:37:07 2024
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Nomen Nescio wrote:

    who is conflicted?

    Hmmm, interesting topic... that probably deserves to be
    discussed in a more serious place and explored earnestly... by
    adults.

    I didn’t see the original post because my NNTP provider knows a racist
    troll when it sees one.

    People outside the U.K. sometimes don’t seem to realise that most of us see
    a person’s colour. And their hairstyle. And their gender. And all of those things have equal weight - in the context of a politician, or even most
    other things, virtually none.

    Now, yes, she’s right wing. The Tories were severely damaged in the last election by the success of the very far right Reform party. So they figure
    they need to swing further right to get those votes back.

    But that’s just going to lose them the centre, who will move to the Lib
    Dems or even (if they can settle in) the current Labour administration
    which is barely left of centre.

    They’re on a losing path. If they could move to the centre without losing
    any more of their right wing, and work to make Reform irrelevant so that
    their support drifts back to its natural home of the Tory right wing, they might recover.

    But the path they’ve chosen - will just make them Reform 2.0 … and they’ll
    stabilise at a low percentage of votes and have to start seeking electoral reform to fix our “broken” first past the post electoral system under which they’ll never have a meaningful voice again.

    At least, we can all hope so.

    --
    “Most of the Universe is knackered, babes.” - The Doctor

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to The Last Doctor on Sun Nov 3 23:15:28 2024
    The Last Doctor wrote:

    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Nomen Nescio wrote:

    who is conflicted?

    Hmmm, interesting topic... that probably deserves to be
    discussed in a more serious place and explored earnestly...
    by adults.

    I didn’t see the original post because my NNTP provider knows
    a racist troll when it sees one.

    Yes, Ray operates a tight ship when it comes to spam. (HMS
    SpamAssassin)

    I wasn't gonna do the politics thing here as we're gonna have
    enough of that in the serious newsgroups from our American
    cousins come Tuesday night (onwards), but as we're here and the
    tea is made...

    People outside the U.K. sometimes don’t seem to realise that
    most of us see a person’s colour. And their hairstyle. And
    their gender. And all of those things have equal weight - in
    the context of a politician, or even most other things,
    virtually none.

    I would go for the latter, although I know to some people the
    former is very important. Look at what happens over the pond
    where image is often everything. If Joe Biden could have spoken
    proper sentences and stood up for a bit without falling over he
    might still have had a chance of a second term... they are so
    shallow over there!

    I don't know much about Kemi Badenoch to be honest. Well, apart
    from she's a conservative politician and she isn't Rishi Sunak!
    Sunak never filled me with any confidence as the British PM
    though. He just seemed to me like an insincere rich arse-hole
    who didn't really give a damn as he would be moving on to
    greener pastures when his term of office was done... like all of
    them!

    Now, yes, she’s right wing. The Tories were severely damaged
    in the last election by the success of the very far right
    Reform party. So they figure they need to swing further right
    to get those votes back.

    If you have a left you have to have a right. Ying-yang.

    Politics should be about caring for the people in the country
    though, everyone... regardless of race, colour or creed. Yet
    from what I see most politicians - here and everywhere - only
    seem to care for themselves. They'd lie, cheat and steal to get
    in to office and then do whatever they damn well liked after
    that. Do as I say not as I do, etc. That's why I am apathetic
    towards politics these days... Guy Fawkes had the right idea!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to mike@xenocyte.com on Mon Nov 4 01:14:51 2024
    In article <vg8qe3$i10o$1@dont-email.me>,
    The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Nomen Nescio wrote:

    who is conflicted?

    Hmmm, interesting topic... that probably deserves to be
    discussed in a more serious place and explored earnestly... by
    adults.

    I didn’t see the original post because my NNTP provider knows a racist >troll when it sees one.

    People outside the U.K. sometimes don’t seem to realise that most of us see >a person’s colour. And their hairstyle. And their gender. And all of those >things have equal weight - in the context of a politician, or even most
    other things, virtually none.

    Now, yes, she’s right wing. The Tories were severely damaged in the last >election by the success of the very far right Reform party. So they figure >they need to swing further right to get those votes back.

    But that’s just going to lose them the centre, who will move to the Lib >Dems or even (if they can settle in) the current Labour administration
    which is barely left of centre.

    They’re on a losing path. If they could move to the centre without losing >any more of their right wing, and work to make Reform irrelevant so that >their support drifts back to its natural home of the Tory right wing, they >might recover.

    But the path they’ve chosen - will just make them Reform 2.0 … and they’ll
    stabilise at a low percentage of votes and have to start seeking electoral >reform to fix our “broken” first past the post electoral system under which
    they’ll never have a meaningful voice again.

    At least, we can all hope so.


    The CaUP will be moving to the right.

    --
    “Most of the Universe is knackered, babes.” - The Doctor


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Lest we forget 11/11/2024

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Mon Nov 4 01:56:28 2024
    The Doctor wrote:

    In article <vg8qe3$i10o$1@dont-email.me>,
    The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:

    People outside the U.K. sometimes don’t seem to realise that
    most of us see a person’s colour. And their hairstyle. And
    their gender. And all of those things have equal weight - in
    the context of a politician, or even most other things,
    virtually none.

    Now, yes, she’s right wing. The Tories were severely damaged
    in the last election by the success of the very far right
    Reform party. So they figure they need to swing further
    right to get those votes back.

    But that’s just going to lose them the centre, who will move
    to the Lib Dems or even (if they can settle in) the current
    Labour administration which is barely left of centre.

    They’re on a losing path. If they could move to the centre
    without losing any more of their right wing, and work to
    make Reform irrelevant so that their support drifts back to
    its natural home of the Tory right wing, they might recover.

    But the path they’ve chosen - will just make them Reform 2.0
    … and they’ll stabilise at a low percentage of votes and
    have to start seeking electoral reform to fix our “broken”
    first past the post electoral system under which they’ll
    never have a meaningful voice again.

    At least, we can all hope so.

    The CaUP will be moving to the right.

    How right is right though? The Tories have just replaced a man
    of Indian descent with a woman of Nigerian descent... so it's
    all relative.

    You've right-on, right, far-right and never-right (you might
    feel an affinity with that one!)... they are all just labels at
    the end of the day though.

    Kemi Badenoch should have a [relatively] easy enough job though,
    she's following Rishi Sunak, Liz Truss and Boris Johnson as
    leader of the Conservative Party... if she only half-does her
    job properly it should still be an improvement on them!!! ;-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Mon Nov 4 04:26:29 2024
    In article <xn0oswete18ojj002@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    The Doctor wrote:

    In article <vg8qe3$i10o$1@dont-email.me>,
    The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:

    People outside the U.K. sometimes don’t seem to realise that
    most of us see a person’s colour. And their hairstyle. And
    their gender. And all of those things have equal weight - in
    the context of a politician, or even most other things,
    virtually none.

    Now, yes, she’s right wing. The Tories were severely damaged
    in the last election by the success of the very far right
    Reform party. So they figure they need to swing further
    right to get those votes back.

    But that’s just going to lose them the centre, who will move
    to the Lib Dems or even (if they can settle in) the current
    Labour administration which is barely left of centre.

    They’re on a losing path. If they could move to the centre
    without losing any more of their right wing, and work to
    make Reform irrelevant so that their support drifts back to
    its natural home of the Tory right wing, they might recover.

    But the path they’ve chosen - will just make them Reform 2.0
    … and they’ll stabilise at a low percentage of votes and
    have to start seeking electoral reform to fix our “broken”
    first past the post electoral system under which they’ll
    never have a meaningful voice again.

    At least, we can all hope so.

    The CaUP will be moving to the right.

    How right is right though? The Tories have just replaced a man
    of Indian descent with a woman of Nigerian descent... so it's
    all relative.

    You've right-on, right, far-right and never-right (you might
    feel an affinity with that one!)... they are all just labels at
    the end of the day though.

    Kemi Badenoch should have a [relatively] easy enough job though,
    she's following Rishi Sunak, Liz Truss and Boris Johnson as
    leader of the Conservative Party... if she only half-does her
    job properly it should still be an improvement on them!!! ;-)

    There are all right out of it like Farage!
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Lest we forget 11/11/2024

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Mon Nov 4 20:23:31 2024
    Blueshirt wrote on 4/11/24 10:15 am:

    <Snip>

    If you have a left you have to have a right. Ying-yang.

    As I was reading this thread, I started thinking ... "Can a Political
    Spectrum ever be loop-sided??"

    That is if everyone fell on the Political Spectrum ranging from, say,
    'Extreme Right' through 'Centre' to 'Centre-Left', would it remain like
    that ...

    or ... would the 'Extreme Right' drift in to become 'The Right' and 'The Centre' drift left-ish and the 'Centre-Left' become 'The Left'??
    --
    Daniel

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 4 13:47:31 2024
    Daniel70 wrote:

    Blueshirt wrote on 4/11/24 10:15 am:

    <Snip>

    If you have a left you have to have a right. Ying-yang.

    As I was reading this thread, I started thinking ... "Can a
    Political Spectrum ever be lop-sided??"

    Politicians will wear whatever coat gets them the most votes.
    How sincere they are to any actual belief is open to question.

    This is not a new phenomenon... the UK had a politician called
    [Sir] Oswald Mosley, who was the leader of the British Union of
    Fascists in 1930's, but he was also an elected MP for both the
    Labour and Conservative Parties during his political career. If
    that wasn't lop-sided I don't know what is!

    The people who think the new Conservative Party leader is
    "far-right" clearly believe anything to the 'right' of Joseph
    Stalin is "far-right"! Whilst the British Prime Minister Kier
    Starmer is no more a traditional Labour socialist than I am. For
    me, when I see him on the TV he comes across more like a
    traditional Tory... just with a red tie! So political spectrum
    labels don't really mean much when you've politicians that would
    sell their granny to get power.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to daniel47@nomail.afraid.org on Mon Nov 4 14:06:02 2024
    In article <vga3qk$slpj$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    Blueshirt wrote on 4/11/24 10:15 am:

    <Snip>

    If you have a left you have to have a right. Ying-yang.

    As I was reading this thread, I started thinking ... "Can a Political >Spectrum ever be loop-sided??"

    That is if everyone fell on the Political Spectrum ranging from, say, >'Extreme Right' through 'Centre' to 'Centre-Left', would it remain like
    that ...

    or ... would the 'Extreme Right' drift in to become 'The Right' and 'The >Centre' drift left-ish and the 'Centre-Left' become 'The Left'??
    --
    Daniel

    Or you can have 2 dimensions.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Lest we forget 11/11/2024

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Mon Nov 4 14:08:18 2024
    In article <xn0oswxjwqmuwk002@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:

    Blueshirt wrote on 4/11/24 10:15 am:

    <Snip>

    If you have a left you have to have a right. Ying-yang.

    As I was reading this thread, I started thinking ... "Can a
    Political Spectrum ever be lop-sided??"

    Politicians will wear whatever coat gets them the most votes.
    How sincere they are to any actual belief is open to question.

    This is not a new phenomenon... the UK had a politician called
    [Sir] Oswald Mosley, who was the leader of the British Union of
    Fascists in 1930's, but he was also an elected MP for both the
    Labour and Conservative Parties during his political career. If
    that wasn't lop-sided I don't know what is!

    The people who think the new Conservative Party leader is
    "far-right" clearly believe anything to the 'right' of Joseph
    Stalin is "far-right"! Whilst the British Prime Minister Kier
    Starmer is no more a traditional Labour socialist than I am. For
    me, when I see him on the TV he comes across more like a
    traditional Tory... just with a red tie! So political spectrum
    labels don't really mean much when you've politicians that would
    sell their granny to get power.


    Sounds like Tony Bliar.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Lest we forget 11/11/2024

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Mon Nov 4 20:34:16 2024
    The Doctor wrote:

    In article <xn0oswxjwqmuwk002@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

    The people who think the new Conservative Party leader is
    "far-right" clearly believe anything to the 'right' of Joseph
    Stalin is "far-right"! Whilst the British Prime Minister Kier
    Starmer is no more a traditional Labour socialist than I am.
    For me, when I see him on the TV he comes across more like a
    traditional Tory... just with a red tie! So political
    spectrum labels don't really mean much when you've
    politicians that would sell their granny to get power.

    Sounds like Tony Bliar.

    Yeah, I always thought Tony Blair came across as a red Tory too
    but he did have a bit of charisma. I actually quite liked him...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Tue Nov 5 00:26:13 2024
    In article <xn0osx8aw156o63003@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    The Doctor wrote:

    In article <xn0oswxjwqmuwk002@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

    The people who think the new Conservative Party leader is
    "far-right" clearly believe anything to the 'right' of Joseph
    Stalin is "far-right"! Whilst the British Prime Minister Kier
    Starmer is no more a traditional Labour socialist than I am.
    For me, when I see him on the TV he comes across more like a
    traditional Tory... just with a red tie! So political
    spectrum labels don't really mean much when you've
    politicians that would sell their granny to get power.

    Sounds like Tony Bliar.

    Yeah, I always thought Tony Blair came across as a red Tory too
    but he did have a bit of charisma. I actually quite liked him...

    REd Tory is correct.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Lest we forget 11/11/2024

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Tue Nov 5 21:33:37 2024
    Blueshirt wrote on 5/11/24 7:34 am:
    The Doctor wrote:
    In article <xn0oswxjwqmuwk002@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

    The people who think the new Conservative Party leader is
    "far-right" clearly believe anything to the 'right' of Joseph
    Stalin is "far-right"! Whilst the British Prime Minister Kier
    Starmer is no more a traditional Labour socialist than I am.
    For me, when I see him on the TV he comes across more like a
    traditional Tory... just with a red tie! So political
    spectrum labels don't really mean much when you've
    politicians that would sell their granny to get power.

    Sounds like Tony Bliar.

    Yeah, I always thought Tony Blair came across as a red Tory too
    but he did have a bit of charisma. I actually quite liked him...

    But, NO, Blueshirt, Gobble-de-gook wasn't referring to "Tony Blair", Gobble-de-gook was referring to that figment of his sadly lacking
    imagination, 'Tony Bliar'.
    --
    Daniel

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 5 12:17:18 2024
    Daniel70 wrote:

    Blueshirt wrote on 5/11/24 7:34 am:
    The Doctor wrote:
    In article <xn0oswxjwqmuwk002@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

    The people who think the new Conservative Party leader is
    "far-right" clearly believe anything to the 'right' of Joseph
    Stalin is "far-right"! Whilst the British Prime Minister Kier
    Starmer is no more a traditional Labour socialist than I am.
    For me, when I see him on the TV he comes across more like a traditional Tory... just with a red tie! So political
    spectrum labels don't really mean much when you've
    politicians that would sell their granny to get power.

    Sounds like Tony Bliar.

    Yeah, I always thought Tony Blair came across as a red Tory too
    but he did have a bit of charisma. I actually quite liked him...

    But, NO, Blueshirt, Gobble-de-gook wasn't referring to "Tony Blair", Gobble-de-gook was referring to that figment of his sadly lacking imagination, 'Tony Bliar'.

    I assumed that was deliberate on Dave's part. After the Iraq war/WMD thing Tony Bliar was his nickname in some quarters... for being a liar. (I suppose it seemed funny at the time.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to daniel47@nomail.afraid.org on Tue Nov 5 14:52:27 2024
    In article <vgcsa1$1frqb$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    Blueshirt wrote on 5/11/24 7:34 am:
    The Doctor wrote:
    In article <xn0oswxjwqmuwk002@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

    The people who think the new Conservative Party leader is
    "far-right" clearly believe anything to the 'right' of Joseph
    Stalin is "far-right"! Whilst the British Prime Minister Kier
    Starmer is no more a traditional Labour socialist than I am.
    For me, when I see him on the TV he comes across more like a
    traditional Tory... just with a red tie! So political
    spectrum labels don't really mean much when you've
    politicians that would sell their granny to get power.

    Sounds like Tony Bliar.

    Yeah, I always thought Tony Blair came across as a red Tory too
    but he did have a bit of charisma. I actually quite liked him...

    But, NO, Blueshirt, Gobble-de-gook wasn't referring to "Tony Blair", >Gobble-de-gook was referring to that figment of his sadly lacking >imagination, 'Tony Bliar'.
    --
    Daniel

    Really over your head Danyboy!
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Lest we forget 11/11/2024

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Tue Nov 5 14:56:18 2024
    In article <xn0osy9sz7jpurf001@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:

    Blueshirt wrote on 5/11/24 7:34 am:
    The Doctor wrote:
    In article <xn0oswxjwqmuwk002@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

    The people who think the new Conservative Party leader is
    "far-right" clearly believe anything to the 'right' of Joseph
    Stalin is "far-right"! Whilst the British Prime Minister Kier
    Starmer is no more a traditional Labour socialist than I am.
    For me, when I see him on the TV he comes across more like a
    traditional Tory... just with a red tie! So political
    spectrum labels don't really mean much when you've
    politicians that would sell their granny to get power.

    Sounds like Tony Bliar.

    Yeah, I always thought Tony Blair came across as a red Tory too
    but he did have a bit of charisma. I actually quite liked him...

    But, NO, Blueshirt, Gobble-de-gook wasn't referring to "Tony Blair", >Gobble-de-gook was referring to that figment of his sadly lacking >imagination, 'Tony Bliar'.

    I assumed that was deliberate on Dave's part. After the Iraq war/WMD
    thing Tony Bliar was his nickname in some quarters... for being a liar.
    (I suppose it seemed funny at the time.)
    Exactly! Dannyboy is not keeping up!
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Lest we forget 11/11/2024

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)