[continued from previous message]
(Raphael Satter, RISKS 34.62)
The Internet Crime Complaint Center of the U.S. >Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) said global cybercrime costs topped $16 billion in
2024, up a third from the prior year.
US$ 16B is apparently hot-dog money and chump change.
The "60 Minutes" episode from 11MAY2025 entitled, "Fraud costing
U.S. government hundreds of billions a year as crime rings use stolen identities" (see
https:// www.cbsnews.com/news/fraud-costing-us-government-as-crime-rings-use-stolen-identities-60-minutes-transcript/)
reports APTs -- state sponsored gangs of hackers in the PRC, DPKR, Russian Federation, iran, etc. -- liberate between US$ 500B to 750B per year using
the snowballing dark-web trove of breached PII from US citizens to commit disaster claim fraud.
FEMA recovery funds from fires, hurricanes, and floods, and COVID-19
pandemic monies fall from cyberspace into criminal's pockets like radial
tires shed micro/n ano-plastics.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 11:08:13 -0700
From: Steve Bacher <
sebmb1@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: New Zealand's prime minister proposes social media ban for
under-16s (RISKS-34.62)
As usual, the most contentious issue is not whether under-16s should have
their access controlled, but the proposed mechanism for verifying age, which generally involves a scheme that impacts on the privacy rights of over-16s.
I don't know enough about New Zealand's legal or Constitutional system to
know how much of a concern that is, but I'd guess it's not zero. On the positive side, at least it's not porn being talked about here.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 11:10:49 -0700
From: Steve Bacher <
sebmb1@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: After an Arizona man was shot, an AI video of him addresses his
killer in court (RISKS-34.62)
I'm satisfied that the question of juries and evidence is addressed in the article. But more generally, how much weight should be attached to how well
a victim impact statement is produced? Is it a greater crime to murder a super nice person than an average jerk? I don't think so.
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 11:11:11 -0800
From:
RISKS-request@csl.sri.com
Subject: Abridged info on RISKS (comp.risks)
The ACM RISKS Forum is a MODERATED digest. Its Usenet manifestation is
comp.risks, the feed for which is donated by panix.com as of June 2011.
SUBSCRIPTIONS: The mailman Web interface can be used directly to
subscribe and unsubscribe:
http://mls.csl.sri.com/mailman/listinfo/risks
SUBMISSIONS: to risks@CSL.sri.com with meaningful SUBJECT: line that
includes the string `notsp'. Otherwise your message may not be read.
*** This attention-string has never changed, but might if spammers use it.
SPAM challenge-responses will not be honored. Instead, use an alternative
address from which you never send mail where the address becomes public!
The complete INFO file (submissions, default disclaimers, archive sites,
copyright policy, etc.) has moved to the ftp.sri.com site:
<risksinfo.html>.
*** Contributors are assumed to have read the full info file for guidelines!
OFFICIAL ARCHIVES: http://www.risks.org takes you to Lindsay Marshall's
delightfully searchable html archive at newcastle:
http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/VL.IS --> VoLume, ISsue.
Also,
ftp://ftp.sri.com/risks for the current volume/previous directories
or
ftp://ftp.sri.com/VL/risks-VL.IS for previous VoLume
If none of those work for you, the most recent issue is always at
http://www.csl.sri.com/users/risko/risks.txt, and index at /risks-34.00
ALTERNATIVE ARCHIVES:
http://seclists.org/risks/ (only since mid-2001)
*** NOTE: If a cited URL fails, we do not try to update them. Try
browsing on the keywords in the subject line or cited article leads.
Apologies for what Office365 and SafeLinks may have done to URLs.
Special Offer to Join ACM for readers of the ACM RISKS Forum:
<
http://www.acm.org/joinacm1>
------------------------------
End of RISKS-FORUM Digest 34.63
************************
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)