Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 28 |
Nodes: | 6 (1 / 5) |
Uptime: | 61:28:32 |
Calls: | 424 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 1,025 |
Messages: | 91,085 |
Posted today: | 1 |
How much does your system clock (not hardware clock) drift?
I boot my GNU/Linux machines regularly and at each boot I set
the system clock (and also the hardware clock) from the time
servers at NIST using openrdate:
https://github.com/resurrecting-open-source-projects/openrdate
Openrdate will report a drift of about 0.7 seconds per day for all
of my machines.
How much does your system clock drift?
Of course, using a standalone desktop workstation, such drift
is of no consequence. I could set the system clock far more
frequently but what the fuck for?
How much does your system clock drift?
Can the distro lackeys even know?
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
How much does your system clock (not hardware clock) drift?
I boot my GNU/Linux machines regularly and at each boot I set
the system clock (and also the hardware clock) from the time
servers at NIST using openrdate:
https://github.com/resurrecting-open-source-projects/openrdate
Openrdate will report a drift of about 0.7 seconds per day for all
of my machines.
How much does your system clock drift?
Of course, using a standalone desktop workstation, such drift
is of no consequence. I could set the system clock far more
frequently but what the fuck for?
How much does your system clock drift?
Can the distro lackeys even know?
Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote:
Le 08-05-2025, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> a écrit :
Can the distro lackeys even know?
Of course I know. And a default ntp configuration of any distro lackey >>works more properly than your computers. You should remember the simple >>sentence: "if it ain't broke, don't fix it."
Burn! You used an American English saying that way, despite being
French, and Larry is just left to feel like a fucking lame loser, which
he apparently will always be.
For my system: it doesn't drift.
The ntp is there to prevent it. And it works fine out of the box.
How much does your system clock drift?
I told you: it doesn't.
How much does your system clock drift?
For the third time, my system doesn't drift.
Can the distro lackeys even know?
Of course I know. And a default ntp configuration of any distro lackey
works
On Fri, 09 May 2025 17:25:03 -0400, Joel wrote:
Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote:
Le 08-05-2025, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> a écrit :
Can the distro lackeys even know?
Of course I know. And a default ntp configuration of any distro lackey >>>works more properly than your computers. You should remember the simple >>>sentence: "if it ain't broke, don't fix it."
Burn! You used an American English saying that way, despite being
French, and Larry is just left to feel like a fucking lame loser, which
he apparently will always be.
There is the equally important 'if you don't understand it, don't fuck
with it.'
On 09 May 2025 21:19:57 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
For my system: it doesn't drift.
Yes it does. All PCs will drift.
The ntp is there to prevent it. And it works fine out of the box.
That's the lackey answer.
The lackey doesn't know, doesn't care, and allows the distro
to do it all for him.
Because of the large numbers of lackeys that use GNU/Linux
many fine programs such as openrdate are going unmaintained:
https://github.com/resurrecting-open-source-projects/openrdate
How much does your system clock drift?
I told you: it doesn't.
And I told you that it does.
How much does your system clock drift?
For the third time, my system doesn't drift.
For the third time, yes it does.
Can the distro lackeys even know?
Of course I know. And a default ntp configuration of any distro lackey
works
Then you admit that you are a lackey.
Now listen. This group is intended for GNU/Linux _advocates_ and an
advocate is someone who knows and cares.
A lackey cannot be an advocate,
so get out of here and don't come back.
Yes it does. All PCs will drift.
Nonononono. You precisely said you were speaking about systems and not
about hardware.
Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
On 10 May 2025 12:58:18 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
Yes it does. All PCs will drift.
Nonononono. You precisely said you were speaking about systems and not
about hardware.
Yesyesyesyesyes.
The implication, as any INTELLIGENT person would discern, is that
any PC that is running GNU/Linux will drift in both the hardware
clock and the system clock.
The original question was: "How much drift?"
But you cannot answer because you don't control your own system.
Your distro does all the work.
You are just a helpless observer.
I should also ask: "Does the clock correction include leap seconds?"
Again, you cannot answer. You could not ever know if your system time >>includes leap seconds or not.
This one wouldn't work with LP/DP/FR/whatever because, even if every
message proves the opposite, he is sure he understands everything on his computers.
The hardware drifts, yes, there is no way around. But the system can
estimate its drift and compensate for it. So, once again, unlike your beliefs, my hardware drift but my system doesn't.
Of course my system does include leap seconds.
As long as it works I don't care if it's init.d, systemd,
Xorg, Wayland, or any of the other stuff some people get exercised about.
Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
On 10 May 2025 12:58:18 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
Yes it does. All PCs will drift.
Nonononono. You precisely said you were speaking about systems and not
about hardware.
Yesyesyesyesyes.
The implication, as any INTELLIGENT person would discern, is that
any PC that is running GNU/Linux will drift in both the hardware
clock and the system clock.
The original question was: "How much drift?"
But you cannot answer because you don't control your own system.
Your distro does all the work. You are just a helpless observer.
I should also ask: "Does the clock correction include leap seconds?"
Again, you cannot answer. You could not ever know if your system time
includes leap seconds or not.
You are BLIND and HELPLESS. Your distro is your guide dog:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guide_dog
Get a fucking life, sheesh.
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:
Get a fucking job, you lazy wankstain.
I work very hard, dumbshit.
On 10 May 2025 10:25:56 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
This one wouldn't work with LP/DP/FR/whatever because, even if every
message proves the opposite, he is sure he understands everything on his
computers.
Dunning-Kruger. Half the time I'm in fake it till you make it mode. There are things like dbus that I give a wide berth to. For that matter I'm not
too sure what freedesktop does for a living other than Fedora updates it frequently. As long as it works I don't care if it's init.d, systemd,
Xorg, Wayland, or any of the other stuff some people get exercised about.
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:
You collect welfare you fucking mooch.Get a fucking job, you lazy wankstain.
I work very hard, dumbshit.
It's not welfare, you fucking moron, it's earned, I earned the SSDI
when I worked, my parents earned the rest. Fuck you.
Joel wrote:
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:
You collect welfare you fucking mooch.Get a fucking job, you lazy wankstain.
I work very hard, dumbshit.
It's not welfare, you fucking moron, it's earned, I earned the SSDI
when I worked, my parents earned the rest. Fuck you.
You're a mooch on society you lazy pillow biter.
Now, the solution is to check for an atomic clock who doesn't drift
because at the same time it's more precise and there are more than one
clock, so they can average the drift and stay stable.
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:
You're a mooch on society you lazy pillow biter.You collect welfare you fucking mooch.Get a fucking job, you lazy wankstain.
I work very hard, dumbshit.
It's not welfare, you fucking moron, it's earned, I earned the SSDI
when I worked, my parents earned the rest. Fuck you.
No, I'm not. I'm doing what I'm supposed to be doing. You are just a fucking dumbshit cracker running Win8 without even the 8.1 update,
you're a doofus. You're nothing. I'm on the front lines of what's
happening in the world, you're trolling Usenet in 2025 like a
goofball.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-05-11 16:14, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Joel wrote:
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:You're a mooch on society you lazy pillow biter.
You collect welfare you fucking mooch.Get a fucking job, you lazy wankstain.
I work very hard, dumbshit.
It's not welfare, you fucking moron, it's earned, I earned the SSDI
when I worked, my parents earned the rest. Fuck you.
ROFL.
A dummy like you would find that funny, heh.
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0)
You're not only a lazy mooch on society you're also
clueless since I'm on Windows 10, not 8. And even if
you were right it wouldn't change the fact that you
sit on your lazy ass mooching instead of getting a
job.
Why does your header say you're running Win8 if you aren't?>
Joel wrote:
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0)
You're not only a lazy mooch on society you're also clueless since
I'm on Windows 10, not 8. And even if you were right it wouldn't
change the fact that you sit on your lazy ass mooching instead of
getting a job.
Why does your header say you're running Win8 if you aren't?>
Here's my OS capture after running the winver command:
https://postimg.cc/GHRLSbkV
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:
Why does your header say you're running Win8 if you aren't?>Here's my OS capture after running the winver command:
https://postimg.cc/GHRLSbkV
If you say so.
Now, stop changing the topic from you being
a lazy SSI collecting mooch on society, you
clueless wanker.
I *DON'T* get SSI, I make too much *earned* income for that, because
of my parents.
On Mon, 12 May 2025 04:14:35 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote in <183eb98280bdbe81$93449$2706$26dd2c6e@news.thecubenet.com>:
Joel wrote:
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:
>
>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
>>>
>> You're not only a lazy mooch on society you're also clueless since
>> I'm on Windows 10, not 8. And even if you were right it wouldn't
>> change the fact that you sit on your lazy ass mooching instead of
>> getting a job.
>
>
> Why does your header say you're running Win8 if you aren't?>
>
Here's my OS capture after running the winver command:
https://postimg.cc/GHRLSbkV
Better get off the stick and upgrade before your OS goes EOL.
BTW: Win11 isn't an upgrade, you're going to want to go with
Linux. (You know you do.)
vallor wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 04:14:35 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wroteBetter fuck off, asshat.
in <183eb98280bdbe81$93449$2706$26dd2c6e@news.thecubenet.com>:
Joel wrote:
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:
>
>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
>>>
>> You're not only a lazy mooch on society you're also clueless
>> since I'm on Windows 10, not 8. And even if you were right it
>> wouldn't change the fact that you sit on your lazy ass mooching
>> instead of getting a job.
>
>
> Why does your header say you're running Win8 if you aren't?>
>
Here's my OS capture after running the winver command:
https://postimg.cc/GHRLSbkV
Better get off the stick and upgrade before your OS goes EOL.
BTW: Win11 isn't an upgrade, you're going to want to go with Linux.
(You know you do.)
On Mon, 12 May 2025 09:28:33 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote in <183ecaa465e86492$85888$647894$2add206e@news.thecubenet.com>:
vallor wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 04:14:35 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wroteBetter fuck off, asshat.
in <183eb98280bdbe81$93449$2706$26dd2c6e@news.thecubenet.com>:
Joel wrote:
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:
>
>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
>>>
>> You're not only a lazy mooch on society you're also clueless
>> since I'm on Windows 10, not 8. And even if you were right it
>> wouldn't change the fact that you sit on your lazy ass mooching
>> instead of getting a job.
>
>
> Why does your header say you're running Win8 if you aren't?>
>
Here's my OS capture after running the winver command:
https://postimg.cc/GHRLSbkV
Better get off the stick and upgrade before your OS goes EOL.
BTW: Win11 isn't an upgrade, you're going to want to go with Linux.
(You know you do.)
Is that the best you can do?
You know you want to run Linux like all the cool kids do.
vallor wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 09:28:33 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wroteYou mean like that pillow biting Joel queer, *you* may consider that
in <183ecaa465e86492$85888$647894$2add206e@news.thecubenet.com>:
vallor wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 04:14:35 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net>Better fuck off, asshat.
wrote in <183eb98280bdbe81$93449$2706$26dd2c6e@news.thecubenet.com>:
Joel wrote:
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:
>
>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
>>>
>> You're not only a lazy mooch on society you're also clueless
>> since I'm on Windows 10, not 8. And even if you were right it
>> wouldn't change the fact that you sit on your lazy ass
>> mooching instead of getting a job.
>
>
> Why does your header say you're running Win8 if you aren't?>
>
Here's my OS capture after running the winver command:
https://postimg.cc/GHRLSbkV
Better get off the stick and upgrade before your OS goes EOL.
BTW: Win11 isn't an upgrade, you're going to want to go with Linux.
(You know you do.)
Is that the best you can do?
You know you want to run Linux like all the cool kids do.
lazy SSI mooching poofter cool but I certainly don't.
On Mon, 12 May 2025 10:27:04 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote in <183ecdd5c410e8c8$51003$4491$6add606a@news.thecubenet.com>:
vallor wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 09:28:33 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wroteYou mean like that pillow biting Joel queer, *you* may consider that
in <183ecaa465e86492$85888$647894$2add206e@news.thecubenet.com>:
vallor wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 04:14:35 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net>Better fuck off, asshat.
wrote in <183eb98280bdbe81$93449$2706$26dd2c6e@news.thecubenet.com>: >>>>
Joel wrote:
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:
>
>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
>>>
>> You're not only a lazy mooch on society you're also clueless >>>>> >> since I'm on Windows 10, not 8. And even if you were right it >>>>> >> wouldn't change the fact that you sit on your lazy ass
>> mooching instead of getting a job.
>
>
> Why does your header say you're running Win8 if you aren't?>
>
Here's my OS capture after running the winver command:
https://postimg.cc/GHRLSbkV
Better get off the stick and upgrade before your OS goes EOL.
BTW: Win11 isn't an upgrade, you're going to want to go with Linux. >>>> (You know you do.)
Is that the best you can do?
You know you want to run Linux like all the cool kids do.
lazy SSI mooching poofter cool but I certainly don't.
You left out the part of my post that read:
] Failing to even try it only shows the weakness of your technical
] prowess...such as it is.
Because you're _scared_, aren't you? Huh? Right?
Big tough keyboard warrior won't even boot a Mint stick. Bwahahaha.
On Mon, 12 May 2025 10:27:04 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote in <183ecdd5c410e8c8$51003$4491$6add606a@news.thecubenet.com>:
vallor wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 09:28:33 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wroteYou mean like that pillow biting Joel queer, *you* may consider that
in <183ecaa465e86492$85888$647894$2add206e@news.thecubenet.com>:
vallor wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 04:14:35 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net>Better fuck off, asshat.
wrote in <183eb98280bdbe81$93449$2706$26dd2c6e@news.thecubenet.com>: >>>>>
Joel wrote:
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:
>
>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
>>>
>> You're not only a lazy mooch on society you're also clueless >>>>>> >> since I'm on Windows 10, not 8. And even if you were right it >>>>>> >> wouldn't change the fact that you sit on your lazy ass
>> mooching instead of getting a job.
>
>
> Why does your header say you're running Win8 if you aren't?> >>>>>> >
Here's my OS capture after running the winver command:
https://postimg.cc/GHRLSbkV
Better get off the stick and upgrade before your OS goes EOL.
BTW: Win11 isn't an upgrade, you're going to want to go with Linux. >>>>> (You know you do.)
Is that the best you can do?
You know you want to run Linux like all the cool kids do.
lazy SSI mooching poofter cool but I certainly don't.
Big tough keyboard warrior
In article <m8eg7bFrh2oU3@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org says...
I've been using that new mint flavored contraceptive taken before sex, it's called predickamints.
On Mon, 12 May 2025 10:27:04 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote in >> <183ecdd5c410e8c8$51003$4491$6add606a@news.thecubenet.com>:
vallor wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 09:28:33 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote >>>> in <183ecaa465e86492$85888$647894$2add206e@news.thecubenet.com>:You mean like that pillow biting Joel queer, *you* may consider that
vallor wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 04:14:35 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net>Better fuck off, asshat.
wrote in <183eb98280bdbe81$93449$2706$26dd2c6e@news.thecubenet.com>: >>>>>>
Joel wrote:
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:
>
>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0) >>>>>>> Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
>>>
>> You're not only a lazy mooch on society you're also clueless >>>>>>> >> since I'm on Windows 10, not 8. And even if you were right it >>>>>>> >> wouldn't change the fact that you sit on your lazy ass
>> mooching instead of getting a job.
>
>
> Why does your header say you're running Win8 if you aren't?> >>>>>>> >
Here's my OS capture after running the winver command:
https://postimg.cc/GHRLSbkV
Better get off the stick and upgrade before your OS goes EOL.
BTW: Win11 isn't an upgrade, you're going to want to go with Linux. >>>>>> (You know you do.)
Is that the best you can do?
You know you want to run Linux like all the cool kids do.
lazy SSI mooching poofter cool but I certainly don't.
You left out the part of my post that read:
] Failing to even try it only shows the weakness of your technical
] prowess...such as it is.
Because you're _scared_, aren't you? Huh? Right?
Big tough keyboard warrior won't even boot a Mint stick. Bwahahaha.
vallor wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 09:28:33 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net>You mean like that pillow biting Joel queer, *you* may
wrote in
<183ecaa465e86492$85888$647894$2add206e@news.thecubenet.com>:
vallor wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 04:14:35 -0400, Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote >>>> in <183eb98280bdbe81$93449$2706$26dd2c6e@news.thecubenet.com>:Better fuck off, asshat.
Joel wrote:
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net> wrote:
>
>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:128.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
>>>
>> You're not only a lazy mooch on society you're also clueless >>>>> >> since I'm on Windows 10, not 8. And even if you were right it >>>>> >> wouldn't change the fact that you sit on your lazy ass mooching >>>>> >> instead of getting a job.
>
>
> Why does your header say you're running Win8 if you aren't?>
>
Here's my OS capture after running the winver command:
https://postimg.cc/GHRLSbkV
Better get off the stick and upgrade before your OS goes EOL.
BTW: Win11 isn't an upgrade, you're going to want to go with Linux.
(You know you do.)
Is that the best you can do?
You know you want to run Linux like all the cool kids do.
consider that lazy SSI mooching poofter cool but I certainly
don't.
On 10 May 2025 16:09:58 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
Now, the solution is to check for an atomic clock who doesn't drift
because at the same time it's more precise and there are more than one
clock, so they can average the drift and stay stable.
Every clock drifts. It’s just that an atomic clock drifts less than a quartz one.
You can reduce the random error by averaging over multiple clocks. For example, if you have 10 clocks, all with the same random error rate, then
by averaging their readings, you can achieve greater accuracy by a factor
of √10 ≅ 3.