• MUHAMMAD

    From Kurt Snelling@RICKSBBS to All on Thu Feb 5 06:56:02 2026
    From a Baha'i book by 'Abdu'l-Baha:

    MUHAMMAD

    Americans and Europeans have heard a number of stories about
    the Prophet which they have thought to be true, although the
    narrators were either ignorant or antagonistic: most of them were
    clergy; others were ignorant Muslims who repeated unfounded
    traditions about Muhammad which they ignorantly believed to be
    to His praise.

    Thus some benighted Muslims made His polygamy the pivot of
    their praises and held it to be a wonder, regarding it as a
    miracle; and European historians, for the most part, rely on the
    tales of these ignorant people.

    For example, a foolish man said to a clergyman that the true
    proof of greatness is bravery and the shedding of blood, and that
    in one day on the field of battle a follower of Muhammad had cut
    off the heads of one hundred men! This misled the clergyman to
    infer that killing is considered the way to prove one's faith to
    Muhammad, while this is merely imaginary. The military expeditions
    of Muhammad, on the contrary, were always defensive actions: a
    proof of this is that during thirteen years, in Mecca, He and His
    followers endured the most violent persecutions. At this period
    they were the target for the arrows of hatred: some of His
    companions were killed and their property confiscated; others fled
    to foreign lands. Muhammad Himself, after the most extreme
    persecutions by the Qurayshites, who finally resolved to kill Him,
    fled to Medina in the middle of the night. Yet even then His
    enemies did not cease their persecutions, but pursued Him to
    Medina, and His disciples even to Abyssinia.

    These Arab tribes were in the lowest depths of savagery and
    barbarism, and in comparison with them the savages of Africa and
    wild Indians of America were as advanced as a Plato. The savages
    of America do not bury their children alive as these Arabs did
    their daughters, glorying in it as being an honorable thing to do.
    [The Banu-Tamim, one of the most barbarous Arab tribes, practiced
    this odious custom.] Thus many of the men would threaten their
    wives, saying, "If a daughter is born to you, I will kill you."
    Even down to the present time the Arabs dread having daughters.
    Further, a man was permitted to take a thousand women, and most
    husbands had more than ten wives in their household. When these
    tribes made war, the one which was victorious would take the women
    and children of the vanquished tribe captive and treat them as
    slaves.

    When a man who had ten wives died, the sons of these women
    rushed at each other's mothers; and if one of the sons threw his
    mantle over the head of his father's wife and cried out, "This
    woman is my lawful property," at once the unfortunate woman became
    his prisoner and slave. he could do whatever he wished with her.
    He could kill her, imprison her in a well, or beat, curse and
    torture her until death released her. According to the Arab habits
    and customs, he was her master. It is evident that malignity,
    jealousy, hatred and enmity must have existed between the wives and
    children of a household, and it is, therefore, needless to enlarge
    upon the subject. Again, consider what was the condition and life
    of these oppressed women! Moreover, the means by which these Arab
    tribes lived consisted in pillage and robbery, so that they were
    perpetually engaged in fighting and war, killing one another,
    plundering and devastating each other's property, and capturing
    women and children, whom they would sell to strangers. How often
    it happened that the daughters and sons of a prince, who spent
    their day in comfort and luxury, found themselves, when night fell,
    reduced to shame, poverty and captivity. Yesterday they were
    princes, today they are captives; yesterday they were great ladies,
    today they are slaves.

    Muhammad received the Divine Revelation among these tribes,
    and after enduring thirteen years of persecution from them, He
    fled. [To Medina.] But this people did not cease to oppress; they
    united to exterminate Him and all His followers. It was under such circumstances that Muhammad was forced to take up arms. This is
    the truth: we are not bigoted and do not wish to defend Him, but
    we are just, and we say what is just. Look at it with justice.
    If Christ Himself had been placed in such circumstances among such
    tyrannical and barbarous tribes, and if for thirteen years He with
    His disciples had endured all these trials with patience,
    culminating in flight from His native land -- if in spite of this
    these lawless tribes continued to pursue Him, to slaughter the men,
    to pillage their property, and to capture their women and children
    -- what would have been Christ's conduct with regard to them? If
    this oppression had fallen only upon Himself, He would have
    forgiven them, and such an act of forgiveness would have been most praiseworthy; but if He had seen that these cruel and bloodthirsty
    murderers wished to kill, to pillage and to injure all these
    oppressed ones, and to take captive the women and children, it is
    certain that He would have protected them and would have resisted
    the tyrants. What objection, then, can be taken to Muhammad's
    action? Is it this, that He did not, with His followers, and their
    women and children, submit to these savage tribes? To free these
    tribes from their bloodthirstiness was the greatest kindness, and
    to coerce and restrain them was a true mercy. They were like a man
    holding in his hand a cup of poison, which, when about to drink,
    a friend breaks and thus saves him. If Christ had been placed in
    similar circumstances, it is certain that with a conquering power
    He would have delivered the men, women and children from the claws
    of these bloodthirsty wolves.

    Muhammad never fought against the Christians; on the contrary,
    He treated them kindly and gave them perfect freedom. A community
    of Christian people lived at Najran and were under His care and
    protection. Muhammad said, "if anyone infringes their rights, I
    Myself will be his enemy, and in the presence of God I will bring
    a charge against him." In the edicts which He promulgated it is
    clearly stated that the lives, properties and honor of the
    Christians and Jews are under the protection of God; and that if
    a Muhammadan married a Christian woman, the husband must not
    prevent her from going to church, nor oblige her to veil herself;
    and that if she died, he must place her remains in the care of the
    Christian clergy. Should the Christians desire to build a church,
    Islam ought to help them. In case of war between Islam and her
    enemies, the Christians should be exempted from the obligation of
    fighting, unless they desired of their own free will to do so in
    defense of Islam, because they were under its protection. But as
    a compensation for this immunity, they should pay yearly a small
    sum of money. In short, there are seven detailed edicts on these
    subjects, some copies of which are still extant at Jerusalem. This
    is an established fact and not dependent on my affirmation. The
    edict of the second Caliph [Of 'Umar] still exists in the custody
    of the orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem, and of this there is no
    doubt. [Cf. Jurji Zaydan's _Umayyads and Abbasids_, trans. D. S.
    Margoliouth.]

    Nevertheless, after a certain time, and through the
    transgression of both the Muhammadans and the Christians, hatred
    and enmity arose between them. Beyond this fact, all the
    narrations of the Muslims, Christians and others are simply
    fabrications, which have their origin in fanaticism, or ignorance,
    or emanate from intense hostility.

    For example, the Muslims say that Muhammad cleft the moon, and
    that it fell on the mountain of Mecca: they think that the moon is
    a small body which Muhammad divided into two parts and threw one
    part on this mountain, and the other part on another mountain.

    Such stories are pure fanaticism. Also the traditions which
    the clergy quote, and the incidents with which they find fault, are
    all exaggerated, if not entirely without foundation.

    Briefly, Muhammad appeared in the desert of Hijaz in the
    Arabian Peninsula, which was a desolate, sterile wilderness, sandy
    and uninhabited. Some parts, like Mecca and Medina, are extremely
    hot; the people are nomads with the manners and customs of the
    dwellers in the desert, and are entirely destitute of education and
    science. Muhammad Himself was illiterate, and the Qur'an was
    originally written upon the bladebones of sheep, or on palm leaves.
    These details indicate the condition of the people to whom Muhammad
    was sent. The first question which He put to them was, "Why do you
    not accept the Pentateuch and the Gospel, and why do you not
    believe in Christ and in Moses?" This saying presented
    difficulties to them and they argued, "Our forefathers did not
    believe in the Pentateuch and the Gospel; tell us, why was this?"
    He answered, "They were misled; you ought to reject those who do
    not believe in the Pentateuch and the Gospel, even though they are
    your fathers and your ancestors."

    In such a country, and amidst such barbarous tribes, an
    illiterate Man produced a book in which, in a perfect and eloquent
    style, He explained the divine attributes and perfections, the
    prophethood of the Messengers of God, the divine laws, and some
    scientific facts.

    Thus, you know that before the observations of modern times -
    - that is to say, during the first centuries and down to the
    fifteenth century of the Christian era -- all the mathematicians
    of the world agreed that the earth was the center of the universe,
    and that the sun moved. The famous astronomer who was the
    protagonist of the new theory discovered the movement of the earth
    and the immobility of the sun. [Copernicus.] Until his time all
    the astronomers and philosophers of the world followed the
    Ptolemaic system, and whoever said anything against it was
    considered ignorant. Though Pythagoras, and Plato during the
    latter part of his life, adopted the theory that the annual
    movement of the sun around the zodiac does not proceed from the
    sun, but rather from the movement of the earth around the sun, this
    theory had been entirely forgotten, and the Ptolemaic system was
    accepted by all the mathematicians. But there are some verses
    revealed in the Qur'an contrary to the theory of the Ptolemaic
    system. One of them is "The sun moves in a fixed place," which
    shows the fixity of the sun, and its movement around an axis.
    [Qur'an 36:37] Again, in another verse, "and each star moves in
    its own heaven." [Qur'an 36:38] Thus is explained the movement of
    the sun, of the moon, of the earth, and of other bodies. When the
    Qur'an appeared, all the mathematicians ridiculed these statements
    and attributed the theory to ignorance. Even the doctors of Islam,
    when they saw that these verses were contrary to the accepted
    Ptolemaic system, were obliged to explain them away.

    It was not until after the fifteenth century of the Christian
    era, nearly nine hundred years after Muhammad, that a famous
    astronomer made new observations and important discoveries by the
    aid of the telescope, which he had invented. [Galileo] The
    rotation of the earth, the fixity of the sun, and also its movement
    around an axis, were discovered. It became evident that the verses
    of the Qur'an agreed with existing facts, and that the Ptolemaic
    system was imaginary.

    In short, many Oriental peoples have been reared for thirteen
    centuries under the shadow of the religion of Muhammad. During the
    Middle Ages, while Europe was in the lowest depths of barbarism,
    the Arab peoples were superior to the other nations of the earth
    in learning, in the arts, mathematics, civilization, government and
    other sciences. The Enlightener and Educator of these Arab tribes,
    and the Founder of the civilization and perfections of humanity
    among these different races, was an illiterate Man, Muhammad. Was
    this illustrious Man a thorough Educator or not? A just judgment
    is necessary.


    'Abdu'l-Baha
    _Some Answered Questions_, pages 18-24
    (c) 1930, 1954, 1964, 1981
    by the National Spiritual Assembly
    of the Baha'is of the United States
    All Rights Reserved

    For electronic reproduction only! Do not reproduce in any other
    way without permission from the National Spiritual Assembly of the
    Baha'is of the United States. Copies intended for electronic
    reproduction such as within files available for download on
    Bulletin Board Systems must contain the copyright information and
    this paragraph and must not be altered in any way.

    Kurt,
    telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23
    http://ricksbbs.synchro.net:8080
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Rick's BBS telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23