• JOSEPH SMITH'S FIRST VISION

    From Denise Stevens@RICKSBBS to All on Wed Feb 4 06:39:20 2026
    JOSEPH SMITH'S FIRST VISION
    Fact or Fable ?
    By W. P. Walters

    "Sometime in the second year after our removal to
    Manchester, there was in the place where we lived an unusual
    excitement on the subject of religion. It commenced with the
    Methodists, but soon became general among all the sects in the
    region of country ... my mind became somewhat partial to the
    Methodists ... but so great was the confusion and strife among
    the different denominations, that it was impossible ... to come
    to any certain conclusion who was right, and who was wrong ... in
    accordance with this, by determination, to ask God, I retired to
    the woods to make an attempt. It was on the morning of a
    beautiful, clear day, early in the spring of eighteen hundred and
    twenty ... I kneeled down and began to offer up the desires of my
    heart to God. ... I saw a pillar of light exactly over my head
    ... When the light rested upon me I saw two personages, (whose
    brightness and glory defy all description) standing above me in
    the air ... I asked the personages who stood above me in the
    light, which of all the sects was right, (for at this time it had
    never entered into my heart that all were wrong) and which I
    should join. I was answered that I must join none of them, for
    they were all wrong ..." Joseph Smith, Jr.

    The well publicized story above, of Joseph Smith's First
    Vision is not a true account of the origin of the Latter Day
    Saint movement. The facts are decidedly against it!
    First, the historical evidence shows that Joseph Smith, Jr.
    could not have been stirred by an 1820 revival, to ask which
    church was true.
    Second, early Mormon statements do not support his claim
    that in 1820 he learned through a visitation of the Father and
    the Son that all existing churches were wrong.
    Third, the details known about Joseph's early life
    contradict his assertion that in 1820 he had such a divine
    visitation and was persecuted by the community for telling such a
    story.

    NO 1820 REVIVAL .....

    First his neighborhood in 1820 experienced no revival such
    as he described, in which "great multitudes" joined the
    Methodist, Baptist, and Presbyterian churches. The Presbyterian
    records for the Palmyra Presbyterian Church show that it
    experienced no revival in 1820. The local Baptist Church gained
    only six on profession of faith the entire year, while the
    Methodists actually lost members that year as well as the
    preceeding and following years. (Minutes of the Annual
    Conference)
    Joseph Smith claimed that his mother, sister and two
    brothers were led to join the local Presbyterian Church as a
    result of that 1820 revival. However, four years before he made
    this claim, his own church paper had stated that the revival in
    which his family had been led to join the Presbyterian Church
    took place in 1823. (Messenger & Advocate I, pp. 42, 78) In fact,
    that account says it was the same 1823 revival that led him to go
    to his bedroom (not to a sacred grove) and pray "if a Supreme
    being did exist" and to know that "he was accepted of him." An
    angel (not a deity) is then reported to have appeared and told
    him of his forgiveness and of the gold plates.
    Joseph's mother, likewise, knew nothing of an 1820 vision.
    In her unpublished account she traces the origin of Mormonism to
    a BEDROOM VISIT by an angel. Joseph at the time had been
    "pondering which of the churches were the true one." The angel
    told him "there is not a true church on Earth, No not one."
    (First draft of "Lucy Smith's History," LDS Church Archives)
    Furthermore, she tells us that the revival which led to her
    joining the church took place following the death of her son,
    Alvin. Alvin died November 19, 1823, and following that painful
    loss she reports that: "..about this time there was a great
    revival in religion and the whole neighborhood was very much
    aroused to the subject and we among the rest, flocked to the
    meeting house to see if there was a word of comfort for us that
    might relieve our over-charged feelings." (P. 86)
    She adds that although her husband would only attend the
    first meetings, he had no objection to her or the children "going
    or BECOMING CHURCH MEMBERS." (emphasis added)
    There is plenty of additional evidence that the revival Lucy
    Smith refers to did occur during the winter of 1824-1825. It was
    reported in at least a dozen newspapers and religious
    periodicals. The church records show outstanding increases due to
    the reception of new converts. The Baptist Church received 94,
    the Presbyterian 99, while the Methodist work grew by 208. No
    such revival bringing in "great multitudes" occurred in 1820.
    It is clear that the revival Joseph Smith, Jr. described did
    not occur in 1820, but in 1824. Joseph Smith arbitrarily moved
    that revival back four years to 1820 and made it fit a First
    Vision story that neither his mother nor other close associates
    had heard of in those early days. The historical facts completely
    discredit Joseph Smith's First Vision story. (For further details
    see, DIALOGUE: A JOURNAL OF MORMON THOUGHT, Spring 1969, pp. 59-
    100)

    BIBLE READING vs. REVELATIONS .....

    About 1832, Joseph Smith, Jr. began an account of the origin
    of the Mormon church (the only one written in his own hand), that
    contradicts the official First Vision story he dictated some six
    years later. The account was never finished and has only recently
    been published. (See the text in BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
    STUDIES, Spring 1969, pp. 278ff) In this version Joseph presents
    himself between the ages of twelve and fifteen being a committed
    and perceptive reader of the Bible. He claims that his STUDY OF
    THE SCRIPTURES led him to understand that all the denominations
    were wrong. He wrote: "...by searching the Scriptures I found
    that mankind did not come into the Lord but that they had
    apostatised from the true and living faith and there was no
    society or denomination that built upon the Gospel of Jesus
    Christ as recorded in the new testament."
    Six years later, when he set forth his official First Vision
    story, he decided that he never had reached the firm conclusion
    that all churches were wrong from his study of the Bible.
    Instead, he claimed that it was DURING A VISION OF THE FATHER AND
    THE SON that he first learned this information. He presented this
    as coming as a great surprise, for he added parenthetically -
    "for at this time it had NEVER ENTERED INTO MY HEART THAT ALL
    WERE WRONG." (emphasis added) That statement even contradicted
    what Joseph had said a few paragraphs earlier in the same
    account. There he claimed that "I OFTEN SAID TO MYSELF ... Who of
    all these parties are right; or ARE THEY ALL WRONG TOGETHER?"
    (emphasis added) Although the former statement appears in the
    original manuscript (see BYU Studies above, p. 290), such a
    serious contradiction could not be allowed to stand, and after
    Joseph's death the embarrassing words were edited out.
    Even without these words, however, the 1838 official account
    is in conflict with the 1832 version. In the 1832 account it is
    his Bible reading that stirs him to seek God, while in the 1838
    story it is a non-existent revival that motivates him.
    In the 1832 version he claims to have seen only Christ,
    while in the 1838 rendition both the Father and the Son appear.
    In the 1832 account he already knows all the churches are wrong,
    while in the 1838 story it is the dual deities who first inform
    him of this. Different people may have different views of the
    same event, but when one person tells contradictory stories about
    an event, he completely loses his credibility.

    PERSECUTION vs. ACCEPTANCE .....

    The 1838 First Vision story not only runs into trouble with
    Joseph's earlier 1832 version, it is also contradicted by what we
    know about his early years in Palmyra. In his official version
    Joseph claims he was persecuted by all the churches in his area
    "because I continued to affirm I had seen a vision." However,
    Orsemus Turner, an apprentice printer in Palmyra until 1822, was
    in the same juvenile debating club with Joseph Smith. He recalled
    that Joseph "after catching a spark of Methodism ... became a
    very passable exhorter in evening meetings." (HISTORY OF THE
    PIONEER SETTLEMENT OF PHELPS AND GORHAM'S PURCHASE, 1851, p. 214)
    Thus, instead of being opposed and persecuted as his 1838 account
    claims, young Joseph was welcomed and allowed to exhort during
    the Methodist's evening preaching. Furthermore, no one, either
    Mormon or non-Mormon, seems ever to have heard of Joseph's
    encounter with two divine Personages until after 1838. (see this
    admission in DIALOGUE, Autumn 1966, pp. 30-31; SAINTS HERALD,
    June 29, 1959, p. 21)

    From all available lines of evidence, therefore, Joseph's
    First Vision story appears to be a fabrication. There was NO
    REVIVAL anywhere in the Palmyra area in 1820, Joseph was
    WELCOMED, NOT PERSECUTED by the Methodists. His 1832 account
    represents him as PERCEIVING FROM HIS PERSONAL BIBLE STUDY that
    all the churches were apostate, while his 1838 account said it
    "NEVER ENTERED INTO MY HEART that all were wrong." His 1832
    version claimed ONLY A VISION OF CHRIST, while the 1838 story
    transformed this into THE FATHER AND THE SON. No one ever heard
    such a story until after he dictated it in 1838.
    In the light of such strong contradictory evidence, the
    First Vision story must be regarded as only the invention of
    Joseph Smith's highly imaginative mind. The facts and Joseph's
    own words discredit it.


    This work is presented with the earnest prayer that sincere
    people everywhere may perceive the fallacy and danger of
    Mormonism and will not become entangled in it, and that the dear
    Mormon people who are unfortunately deceived by it, may be
    reclaimed and find the true Way of salvation in the Bible and the
    blessed Saviour whom it reveals.

    "Jesus saith unto him, I am the Way, the Truth, and the
    Life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by Me." (John 14:6)

    We also pray that the earnest reader upon discerning these
    things will search the Word of God, the Bible, the only Book
    whose message is "able to make thee wise unto salvation through
    faith which is in Christ Jesus." (II Timothy 3:15)

    For Further information write:

    Utah Christian Tract Society
    P.O. Box 725
    La Mesa, California 92041


    X-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-X

    Another file downloaded from: NIRVANAnet(tm)

    & the Temple of the Screaming Electron Jeff Hunter 510-935-5845
    Burn This Flag Zardoz 408-363-9766
    realitycheck Poindexter Fortran 510-527-1662
    Lies Unlimited Mick Freen 415-583-4102
    My Dog Bit Jesus Suzanne D'Fault 510-658-8078
    New Dork Sublime Demented Pimiento 415-566-0126

    Specializing in conversations, obscure information, high explosives,
    arcane knowledge, political extremism, diverse sexuality,
    insane speculation, and wild rumours. ALL-TEXT BBS SYSTEMS.

    Full access for first-time callers. We don't want to know who you are,
    where you live, or what your phone number is. We are not Big Brother.

    "Raw Data for Raw Nerves"

    X-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-X


    Denise
    telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23
    http://ricksbbs.synchro.net:8080
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Rick's BBS telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23