• Christos, "Anointed,"

    From Beth Martin@RICKSBBS to All on Mon Feb 2 06:31:23 2026
    Jesus Christ
    by
    Barbara G. Walker

    The Jesus who was called Christos, "Anointed," took his title from Middle-Eastern savior-gods like Adonis and Tammuz, born of the Virgin Sea-goddess Aphrodite-Maria (Myrrha), or Ishtar-Mari (Hebrew Mariamne).
    Earlier biblical versions of the same hero were Joshua son of Nun
    (Exodus 33:11), Jehu son of Nimshi, whom Elijah anointed as a sacred
    king (1 Kings 19:16), and Yeshua son of Morah, The Book of Enoch said
    in the 2nd century B.C.E. that Yeshua or Jesus was the secret name
    given by God to the Son of Man (a Persian title), and that it meant
    "Yahweh saves."
    In northern Israel the name was written Ieu. It was the same as Ieud
    or Jeud, the "only-begotten son" dressed in royal robes and sacrificed
    by god-king Isra-El. Greek versions of the name were Iasion, Jason, or
    Iasus -- the name of one of Demeter's sacrificed consorts, killed by
    Father Zeus after the fertility rite that coupled him with his mother.
    Iasus signified a healer Therapeuta, as the Greeks called the
    Essenes, whose cult groups always included a man with the title of
    Christos. The literal meaning of the name was "healing moon-man,"
    fitting the Hebrew version of Jesus as a son of Mary, the almah or
    "moon maiden."
    It seems Jesus was not one person but a composite of many. He played
    the role of sacred king of the Jews who periodically died in an
    atonement ceremony as surrogate for the real king. "The Semitic
    religions practiced human immolations longer than any other religion, sacrificing children and grown men in order to please sanguiary gods.
    In spite of Hadrians's prohibition of those murderous offerings, they
    were maintained in certain clandestine rites." The priesthood of the
    Jewish God insisted that "one man should die for the people... that the
    whole nation perish not" (John 11:50). Yahweh forgave no sins without bloodshed: "without shedding blood is no remission" (Hebrews 9:22).
    Middle-Eastern traditions presented a long line of slain and
    cannibalized Saviors extending back to prehistory. At first kings, they
    became king-surrogates or "sacred" kings as the power of real
    monarchies developed. The Gospels' Jesus was certainly not the first of
    them, though he may have been one of the last. One passage hints at a
    holy man's understandable fear of such brief, doomed eminence: "When
    Jesus therefore perceived that they would come and take him by force,
    to make him a king, he departed again into a mountain himself alone"
    (John 6:15).
    This Jesus seems to have made little or no impression on his
    contemporaries. No literate person of his own time mentioned him in
    any known writing. The Gospels were not written in his own time, nor
    were they written by anyone who ever saw him in the flesh. The books
    were composed after the establishment of the church, some as late as
    the 2nd century A.D. or later, according to the church's requirements
    for a manufactured tradition. Most scholars believe the earliest book
    of the New Testament was 1 Thessalonians, written perhaps 51 A.D. by
    Paul, who never saw Jesus in person and knew no details of his life
    story.
    the details were accumulated through later adoption of the myths
    attached to every savior-god throughout the Roman empire. Like Adonis,
    Jesus was born of a consecrated temple maiden in the sacred cave of
    Bethlehem, "The House of Bread." He was eaten in the form of bread, as
    were Adonis, Osiris, Dionysus, and others; he called himself the bread
    of God (john 6:33). Like worshippers of Osiris, those of Jesus made him
    apart of themselves by eating him, so as to participate in his
    resurrection: "He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth
    in me, and I in him" (John 6:56).
    Like Attis, Jesus was sacrificed at the spring equinox and rose again
    from the dead on the third day, when he bacame God and ascended to
    heaven. Like Orpheus and Heracles, he "harrowed hell" and brought a
    secret of eternal life, promising to draw all men with him up to glory
    (John 12:32). Like Mithra and all the other solar gods, he celebrated a birthday nine months later at the winter solstice, because the day of
    his death was also the day of his cyclic re-conception.
    From the elder gods, Jesus acquired not only his title of Christos
    but all his other titles as well. Osiris and Tammuz were called Good
    Shepherd. Sarapis was Lord of Death and King of Glory. Mithra and
    Heracles were Light of the World, Sun of Righteousness, Helios the
    Rising Sun. Dionysus was King of Kings, God of Gods. Hermes was the
    Enlightened One and the Logos. Vishnu and Mithra were Son of Man and
    Messiah. Adonis was the Lord and the Bridegroom. Mot-Aleyin was the
    Lamb of God. "Savior" was applied to all of them.
    Mystery cults everywhere taught that ordinary men could be possessed
    by spirits of such gods, and identifed with them as "son" or alter
    egos, as Jesus was. It was the commonly accepted way to acquire
    supernatural powers, as shown by some of the charms used by magicians: "Whatever I say must happen....For I have taken to myself the power of
    Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and the great god-demon Iao Ablanathanalba...for
    I am the Son, I surpass the limit....I am he who is in the seven
    heavens, who standeth in the seven sanctuaries; for I am the son of the
    living God....I have been united with thy sacred form. I have been
    empowered by thy sacred name. I have recieced the effluence of
    goodness, Lord, God of gods, King,....havein attained that nature equal
    to the God's"
    the skeptical Celsus noted that beggars and vagabounds throughout the
    Empire were pretending to work miracles and become gods, throwing fits, prophesying the end of the world, and aspiring to the status of saviors:

    Each has the convenient and customary spiel, "I am the god," or "a
    son of God," or "a divine spirit," and "I have come. For the world
    is about to be distroyed, and you, men, because of your injustice,
    will go (with it). But I wish to save, and you shall see me again
    coming back with heavenly power. Blessed is he who worships me
    now! On all others, both cities and countrysides, I shall cast
    eternal fire. And men who (now) ignore their punishments shall
    repent in vain and groan, but those who believed in me I shall
    preserve immortal."

    Of course this "conspicuously false" doctrine was the central message
    of the Gospels too. Persian eschatology passing through a
    Jewish-Essenic filter predicted "the Son of Man comeing in a cloud with
    power and great glory" (Luke 9:27, 21:27). Jesus promised the end of
    the world in his own generation. The rest of the Gospel material was
    largely devoted to the miracles supposed to demonstate his divine
    power, since religions generally "adduce revelations, apparitions,
    prophecies, miracles, prodigies and sacred mysteries that they may get themselves valued and accepted." Even these miracles were derivative.
    Turning water into wine at Cana was copied from a Dionysian ritual
    practiced at Sidon and other places. In Alexandria the same Dionysian
    miracle was regularly shown before crowds of the faithful, assisted by
    an ingenious system of vessels and siphons, invented by a clever
    engineer named Heron. Many centuries earlier, priestesses at Nineveh
    cured the blind with spittle, and the story was repeated of many
    diffrent gods and their incarnations. Demeter of Eleusis multiplied
    loaves and fishes in her role of Mistress of Earth and Sea. Healing the
    sick, raising the dead, casting out devils, handling poisonous serpents
    (Mark 16:18), etc., were so commonplace that Celsus scorned these
    "Christian" miracles as "nothing more then the common works of those
    enchanters who, for a few oboli, will perform greater deeds in the
    midst of the Forum. ... The magicians of Egypt cast ou evil spirits,
    cure diseases by a breath, and so influence some uncultured men, that
    they produce in them whatever sights and sounds they please. But
    because they do such things shall we consider them the sons of God?
    Magicians often claimed that their prayers could bring flocks of
    supernatural beings to their assistance. Thus Jesus declared that his
    prayer could summon twelve legions (72,000) of guardian angels (Matthew
    26:53). Magicians also communed with their followers by the standard mystery-cult sacrament of bread-flesh and wine blood. In texts on
    magic, "a magician-god gives his own body and blood to a recipient who,
    by eating it, will be united with him in love."
    The ability to walk on water was claimed by Far-Eastern holy men ever
    since Buddhist monks praised it as the mark of the true ascetic. The
    Magic Papyri said almost anyone could walk on water with the help of "a powerful demon." Impossibilities have always been the props of
    religious credulity, as Tertullian admitted: "It is believable because
    it is absurd; it is certain because it is impossible.
    However, repetitive miracles were not so believable as original ones. Therefore early Christians insisted that all the older deities and
    their miracle-tales were invented by the devil, out of his
    foreknowledge of the true religion, so the faithful would be confused
    by past "imitations." Pagan thinkers countered with the observation
    that "The christian religion contains nothing but what Christians hold
    in common with heathens; nothing new, nor truly great." Even St.
    Augustine, finding the hypothesis of the divil's inventions hard to
    swallow, admitted that "the true religion" was known to the ancients,
    and had existed from the beginning of time, but it began to be called
    Christian after "Christ came in the flesh."
    Nevertheless, adherents of the true religion violently disagreed as
    to the circumstances of its foundation. In the first feew centuries
    A.D. there were many mutually hostile Christian sects, and many
    mutually contradictory Gospels. As late as 450, Bishop Theodore of
    Cyrrhus said there were at least 200 diffrent Gospels revered by the
    churches of his own diocese, until he destroyed all but the approved
    canonical four. The other Gospels were lost as stronger sects
    overwhelmed the weaker, wrecked their churches, killed the believers
    and burned their books.
    One scripture, later thrown out of the canon, said Jesus was not
    crucified. Simon of Cyrene suffered on the cross in his place, while
    Jesus stood by laughing at the executioners, saying, "It was another
    who drank of the gall and vinegar; it was not I....it was another,
    Simon, who bore the cross on his shoulder. It was another upon whom
    they placed th crown of thorns. But I was rejoicing in the height....
    And I was laughing at their ignorance." Believers in this scipture
    were persecuted and forced to sign an abjuration reading: "I
    anathematize those who say that Our Lord suffered only in appearance,
    and that there was a man on the cross and another at a distance who
    laughed."
    Some Christians interpreted Jesus's noli me tangere ("Touch me not")
    to mean he came back from the death as an incorporeal spirit, after the
    manner of other apotheosized heroes, such as the Irish hero Laegaire,
    who also told his people not to touch him. Later, an unknown Gospel
    writer inserted the story of doubting Thomas, who insisted on touching
    Jesus. This was to combat the heretical idea that there was no
    resurrection in the flesh, also to subordiinate Jerusalem's numicipal
    god Tammuz (Thomas) to the new savior.
    Actually, the most likely source of primary Christian mythology was
    the Tammuz cult in Jerusalem. Like Tammuz, Jesus was the Bridegroom of
    the Daughter of Zion (John 12:15). Therefore his bride was Anath,
    "Virgin Wisdom Dwelling in Zion," who was also the Mother of God. Her
    dove decended on him at his baptism, signifying (in the old religion)
    that she chose him for the love-death, Anath broke her bridegroom's
    reed scepter, schourged him and pierced him for fructifying blood. She pronounced his death curse, Maranatha (1 Corinthians 16:22). As the
    Gospels said of Jesus, Anath's bridegroom was "forsaken" by El, his
    heavenly father. Jesus's cry to El, "My God, God, why hast thou
    forsaken me?" seems to have been a line written for the second act of
    the sacred drama, the pathos or Passion (Mark 15:34).
    Of course this Passion was originally a sexual one. Jesus's last
    words "it is done" from consummatum est which would be better
    interpeted as "it is consummated", this was interpreted as a sign that
    his was finished, but could equally apply to his marriage (John 19:30).
    As a cross or pillar represented the divine phallus, so a temple
    represented the body of the Goddess, whose "veil" (hymen) was "rent in
    the midst" as jesus passed into death (Luke 23:45). As usual when the
    god disappeared into the underworld, the sun was eclipsed (Luke 23:44).
    In their ignorance of astronomical phenonema, Christians claimed that
    the moon was full at the same time -- Easter is still a full-moon
    festival -- though an eclipse of the sun can only occur at the dark of
    the moon. The full moon really meant impregnation of the Goddess.
    The parting of Jesus's garment recalls the unwrapping of Osiris when
    he emerged from the tomb as the ithyphallic Min, "Husband of his
    Mother." If Jesus was one with his heavenly father, then he also
    married his mother and begot himself. A 4th-century scripture said in
    the underworld he confronted his mother as Death, Mu. She was also the
    Bride disguised as Venus, the evening star, presiding over the death of
    the sun. Jews still recall her in a ritual greeting to the evening
    star. "Come. O friend. let us welcome the Bride."
    Like Pagans, early Christians identified the Bride with the Mother.
    They said Jesus "consummated on the cross" his union with
    Mary-Ecclesia, his bride the church. Augustine wrote: "Like a
    bridegroom Christ went forth from his chamber, he went out with a
    presage of his nuptials....He came to the marriage bed of the cross,
    and there, in mounting it, he consummated his marriage...., he lovingly
    gave himself up to the torment in place of his bride, and he joined
    himself to the woman for ever." John 19:41 says, "In the place where he
    was crucified there was a garden; and in the garden a new sepulchre,
    wherein was never man yet laid." A garden was the conventional symbol
    for te body of the mother/bride at that time; and a new tomb was the
    virgin womb, whence the god would be born again. On the third day,
    Jesus rose from the tomb/womb like Attis, whose resurrection was the
    Hilaria, or Day of Joy. Jesus's resurrection day was named after
    Eostre (Easter), the same Goddess as Astarte, whom the Syurians called
    Mother Mari.
    Three incarnations of Mari, or Mary, stood at the foot of Jesus's
    cross, like the Moerae of Greece. One was his virgin mother. The second
    was his "dearly beloved" Mary magdalene. The third Mary must have
    represented the Crone, so the resembled that of the three Norns at the
    foot of Odin's sacrificial tree. The Fates were present at the
    saacrifices decreed by Heavenly Fathers, whose victims hong on trees or
    pillars "between heaven and earth." Up to Hadrian's time, victims
    offered Zeus at Salamis were anointed with sacred ointments -- thus
    becomeing "Anointed Ones" or "Christ" -- then hung up and stabbed
    through the side with a spear. Nothing in Jesus's myth occurred at
    random; every detail was part of a formal sacrificial tradition, even
    to the "processiong of palms" which glorified sacred kings in ancient
    Babylon.
    Far-Eastern tradition were utilized too. The Roman empire was well
    aware of the teachings ande myths of Buddhism. Buddha images in classic
    Greek style weere made in Pakistan and Afghanistan in the first century
    A.D. Buddhist ideas like the "footprints of Buddha" appeared among
    Christians. Bishop Sulpicus of Jerusalem reported that, as in India,
    "In the dust where Christ trod the marks of His step can still be seen,
    and the earth still bears the printy of this feet." Buddhist metaphors
    and phrasing also appeared in the Gospels. Jesus's formula, "Dearly
    Beloved," was the conventional way for Tantric deities to address their teachings to Devi, their Goddess.
    Scholars' efforts to eliminate paganism from the Gospels in order to
    find a historical Jesus have proved as hopeless as searching for a core
    in an onian. Like a mirage, the Jesus figure looks clear at a distance
    but lacks approachable solidity. "His" sayings and parables came from elsewhere; "his" miracles were twice-told tales. Even the Lord's Prayer
    was a collection of sayings from the Talmud, many derived from earlier
    Egyptian prayers to Osiris. The Sermon on the Mount, sometimes said to
    contain the essence of Christianity, had no original material; it was
    made up of fragments from Psalms, Ecclesiastes, Isaiah, Secrets of
    Enoch, and the Shemone Esreh. Moreover, it was unknown to the author
    of the oldest Gospel, pseudo-Mark.
    The discovery that the Gospels were forged, centuries later than the
    events they described, is still not widely known enven though the
    Catholic Encyclopedia admits, "The idea of a complete and clear-cut
    canon of the New Testament existing from the beginning...has no
    foundation in history." No extant manuscript can be dated earlier then
    the 4th century A.D.; most were written even later. The oldest
    manuscripts contradict one another, as also do even the present canon
    of synopic Gospels.
    The church owed its canon to the Gnostic teacher Marcion, who first
    collected Pauline epistles about the middle of the 2nd century. Later
    he was excommunicated as a heretic because he denied that the
    scriptures were mystical allegories full of magic words of power. The
    epistles he collected were already over a century old, if indeed they
    were written by Paul; much of their material was made up of forged interpolations.
    The most "historical" figure in the Gosples was Pontius Pilate, to
    whom Jesus was presented as "king" of the Jews and simultaneously as a
    criminal deserving the death penalty for "blasphemy" because he called
    himself Christ, Son of the Blessed (Luke 23:3; Mark 14:61-64). This
    alleged crime was no real crime. Eastern provinces swarmed with
    self-styled Christs and Messiahs, calling themselves Sons of God and
    announcing the end of the world. None of them was executed for
    "blasphemy." The beginning of the story probably lay in the traditon of sacred-king sacrifice in Jerusalem long before Pilate's administration,
    when Rome was trying to discourage such barbarisms.
    From 103 to 76 B.C., Jersalem was governed by Alexander Janneaus,
    called the Aeon, who defended his throne by fighting challengers. One
    year, on the Day of Atonement, his people attacked him at the alter,
    waving palm branches to signify that he should die for the earth's
    fertility. Alexander declined the honor and instituted a persecution of
    his won subjects. Another king of Jerusalem took the name of Menelaus, "Moon-king," and practiced the rite of sacred marriage in the timple.
    Herod also made a sacred marriage, and had John the Baptist slain as a surrogate for himself.
    If there was a Jesus cult in Jerusalem after 30 A.D., it completely disappeared forty years later when Titus conquered the city and
    outlawed many local customs including human sacrifice. Jerusalem was
    wholly Romanized under Hadrian. It was newly named Aelia Capitolina and rededicated to the Goddess. The temple became a shrine of Venus.
    Tacitus described the siege of Jerusalem, but his writing is abruptly
    cut off at the moment when Roman forces entered the city -- as if the
    final chapters were deliberately distoryed -- so no one knows what the
    Romans found there. However, Romans did express disapproval of the Jews
    or Christians cannibalistic sacraments. Porphyry called it "absurd
    beyond all absurdity, and bestial beyond every sort of bestiality, that
    a man should taste human flash and drink the blood of men of his own
    genus and species, and by doing should have eternal life."
    From the Christians viewpoint, a real historical Jesus was essential
    to the basic premise of the faith: the possibility of immortality
    through identifcation with his own death and resurrection. Welhausen
    rightly said Jesus would have no place in history unless he died and
    returned exactly as the Gospels said. "If christ hath not been raised,
    your faith is vain" (1 Conrinthians 15:17). Still, despite centuries of reseach, no historical Jesus has come to light. It seems his story was
    not merely overlaid with myth; it was mythic to the core.
    Like all myths, it revealed much about the collective psychology that
    created it. In earlier pagan religions, the Mother and Son periodically
    ousted tyhe Father from his heavenly throne. The divine son of
    Christianity no longer challenged the heavenly king, but tamely
    submitted to his fatal command: "Not my will, but thine, be done" (Luke
    22:42). Some early sects said the Father who demanded his son's blood
    was cruel, even demonic. These were suppressed, but scholars have
    discerned in Christianity "an original attude of hostility toward the
    father figure, which was changed in the first two Christian centuries
    into an attitude of passive masochistic docility.
    If orthodox Christianity demanded subordination of the Son, it was
    even more determined to subordinate the Mother. The Gospels Jesus
    showed little respect for his mother, which troubled the in its
    Renaissance efforts to attract women to the cult of Mary. "Any hero who
    speaks to his mother only twice, and on both occasions addresses her as `Woman,' is a difficult figure for the sentimentalbiographers."
    Together with Jesus's avowed opposition to marriage and the family
    (Matthew 22:30; Luke 14:26), women's primary concerns, New Testament
    sexism tended to disgust educated women of the old world.
    But the Jusus who emulated Buddha in advocationg poverty and humility eventually became the mythic figurehead for one of the world's
    pre-eminent money-making organizations. The cynical Pope Leo
    X exclaimed, "What profit has not that fable of Christ brought us!"
    Modern theologians tend to sidestep the question of whether Jesus was
    in fact a fable or a real person. In view of the complete dearth of
    hard evidence, and the dubious nature of the soft evidence, it seems Christianity is based on the unbiquitous social phenomena of credulity:

    An idea is able to gain and retain the aure of essential truth
    through telling and retelling. This process endows a cherished
    notion with more veracity than a library of facts...Documentation
    plays only a small role in contrast to the act of re-confirmation
    by each generation of scholars. In addition, the further removed
    one gets from the period in question, the greater is the strenth
    of the conviction. Initial incredulousness is soon converted into
    belief in a probability and eventually smug assurance.

    Beth,
    http://ricksbbs.synchro.net:8080
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Rick's BBS telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23