• RADIO 3 UNWIND and RADIO 1 DANCE

    From JMB99@mb@nospam.net to uk.tech.broadcast on Wed Sep 24 14:06:07 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast

    I noticed these two extra stations have been added to added to DAB - how
    have they managed to fit them in? I can't see any stations having been dropped.



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John Williamson@johnwilliamson@btinternet.com to uk.tech.broadcast on Wed Sep 24 15:58:00 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast

    On 24/09/2025 14:06, JMB99 wrote:
    I noticed these two extra stations have been added to added to DAB - how
    have they managed to fit them in? I can't see any stations having been dropped.



    Check the bitrates on the rest of the multiplex?
    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JMB99@mb@nospam.net to uk.tech.broadcast on Wed Sep 24 16:15:43 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast

    On 24/09/2025 14:06, JMB99 wrote:
    I noticed these two extra stations have been added to added to DAB - how have they managed to fit them in?-a I can't see any stations having been dropped.




    I presume they are taking advantage of DAB+?

    They (and RADIO 1 ANTHEMS) are 32K, AAC, Stereo.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark Carver@mark@invalid.com to uk.tech.broadcast on Tue Sep 30 11:21:40 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast

    On 24/09/2025 14:06, JMB99 wrote:
    I noticed these two extra stations have been added to added to DAB - how have they managed to fit them in?-a I can't see any stations having been dropped.



    Wohnort is your friend

    https://www.wohnort.org/dab/uknat.html?PageSpeed=off
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JMB99@mb@nospam.net to uk.tech.broadcast on Tue Sep 30 14:16:27 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast

    On 30/09/2025 11:21, Mark Carver wrote:
    Wohnort is your friend


    But they do not seem to have dropped anything?








    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John Williamson@johnwilliamson@btinternet.com to uk.tech.broadcast on Tue Sep 30 15:09:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast

    On 30/09/2025 14:16, JMB99 wrote:
    On 30/09/2025 11:21, Mark Carver wrote:
    Wohnort is your friend


    But they do not seem to have dropped anything?


    The graphic version below the table seems to show that the total
    available bandwidth has increased slightly.
    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark Carver@mark@invalid.com to uk.tech.broadcast on Tue Sep 30 15:41:27 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast

    On 30/09/2025 14:16, JMB99 wrote:
    On 30/09/2025 11:21, Mark Carver wrote:
    Wohnort is your friend


    But they do not seem to have dropped anything?

    No service has been dropped but R1,2,4, 6 and a couple of others have
    dropped their bit rates from 128k to 112k.

    Anyway, you clearly haven't noticed any degradation in quality for those services, so the BBC will be chuffed to bits (no pun etc)
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JMB99@mb@nospam.net to uk.tech.broadcast on Tue Sep 30 16:18:02 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast

    On 30/09/2025 15:41, Mark Carver wrote:
    Anyway, you clearly haven't noticed any degradation in quality for those services, so the BBC will be chuffed to bits (no pun e


    Not noticed any change but sure there will some claiming to hear the difference.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark Carver@mark@invalid.com to uk.tech.broadcast on Tue Sep 30 18:50:08 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast

    On 30/09/2025 16:18, JMB99 wrote:
    On 30/09/2025 15:41, Mark Carver wrote:
    Anyway, you clearly haven't noticed any degradation in quality for
    those services, so the BBC will be chuffed to bits (no pun e


    Not noticed any change but sure there will some claiming to hear the difference.


    I've not listened to any BBC radio for some years now, but I do recall
    when there'd be the occasional weekend pop-up station (BBC Jazz, Radio 1
    Retro etc) to make room they'd reduce the main stations from 128 to 112.
    I could tell instantly from switching on the radio.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From tony sayer@tony@bancom.co.uk to uk.tech.broadcast on Thu Oct 2 11:34:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast

    In article <10bh58g$3rfqk$1@dont-email.me>, Mark Carver
    <mark@invalid.com> scribeth thus
    On 30/09/2025 16:18, JMB99 wrote:
    On 30/09/2025 15:41, Mark Carver wrote:
    Anyway, you clearly haven't noticed any degradation in quality for
    those services, so the BBC will be chuffed to bits (no pun e


    Not noticed any change but sure there will some claiming to hear the
    difference.


    I've not listened to any BBC radio for some years now, but I do recall
    when there'd be the occasional weekend pop-up station (BBC Jazz, Radio 1 >Retro etc) to make room they'd reduce the main stations from 128 to 112.
    I could tell instantly from switching on the radio.

    I see that BBC Radio 3 is now at 160 K down from where it used to be at
    192K :(..
    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul Ratcliffe@abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78 to uk.tech.broadcast on Thu Oct 2 13:33:19 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast

    On Thu, 2 Oct 2025 11:34:12 +0100, tony sayer <tony@bancom.co.uk> wrote:

    I've not listened to any BBC radio for some years now, but I do recall >>when there'd be the occasional weekend pop-up station (BBC Jazz, Radio 1 >>Retro etc) to make room they'd reduce the main stations from 128 to 112.
    I could tell instantly from switching on the radio.

    I see that BBC Radio 3 is now at 160 K down from where it used to be at
    192K :(..

    If you can see it and hear it then there is still room for more cuts...
    as we used to say.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Scott@newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk to uk.tech.broadcast on Sun Oct 5 13:25:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast

    On Thu, 02 Oct 2025 13:33:19 GMT, Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> wrote:

    On Thu, 2 Oct 2025 11:34:12 +0100, tony sayer <tony@bancom.co.uk> wrote:

    I've not listened to any BBC radio for some years now, but I do recall >>>when there'd be the occasional weekend pop-up station (BBC Jazz, Radio 1 >>>Retro etc) to make room they'd reduce the main stations from 128 to 112. >>>I could tell instantly from switching on the radio.

    I see that BBC Radio 3 is now at 160 K down from where it used to be at
    192K :(..

    If you can see it and hear it then there is still room for more cuts...
    as we used to say.

    The BBC has once again degraded DAB. They obviously have too much
    money when they keep introducing new stations. I think I'll write to
    my MP :-)
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JMB99@mb@nospam.net to uk.tech.broadcast on Mon Oct 6 07:28:30 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast

    On 05/10/2025 13:25, Scott wrote:
    he BBC has once again degraded DAB. They obviously have too much
    money when they keep introducing new stations. I think I'll write to
    my MP EfOe


    I doubt that it is costing them very much (if anything) and can't
    imagine a MP being very interested (unless he has a grudge against the BBC).



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Scott@newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk to uk.tech.broadcast on Mon Oct 6 11:53:17 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast

    On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 07:28:30 +0100, JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> wrote:

    On 05/10/2025 13:25, Scott wrote:
    he BBC has once again degraded DAB. They obviously have too much
    money when they keep introducing new stations. I think I'll write to
    my MP ?

    I doubt that it is costing them very much (if anything) and can't
    imagine a MP being very interested (unless he has a grudge against the BBC).

    On reflection, I suspect this is correct.

    The better solution is to move away from DAB to online delivery, which
    is what they are encouraging anyway. I'm looking at a Ruark R1S Smart
    Radio to replace my bedside radio. (It's a bit expensive but I have
    the bonus of a John Lewis voucher to use). My car at the moment is
    FM/AM only.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JMB99@mb@nospam.net to uk.tech.broadcast on Mon Oct 6 12:14:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast

    On 06/10/2025 11:53, Scott wrote:
    The better solution is to move away from DAB to online delivery, which
    is what they are encouraging anyway. I'm looking at a Ruark R1S Smart
    Radio to replace my bedside radio. (It's a bit expensive but I have
    the bonus of a John Lewis voucher to use). My car at the moment is
    FM/AM only.



    Why is it better?

    If you use 'online delivery', you are limited to places where you have
    an Internet connection and if you use wireless broadband, using your
    mobile phone perhaps, you will not have the advantage of the seamless
    handover between transmitter sites that DAB has.



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.tech.broadcast on Mon Oct 6 11:37:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast

    JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> wrote:
    On 06/10/2025 11:53, Scott wrote:
    The better solution is to move away from DAB to online delivery, which
    is what they are encouraging anyway. I'm looking at a Ruark R1S Smart
    Radio to replace my bedside radio. (It's a bit expensive but I have
    the bonus of a John Lewis voucher to use). My car at the moment is
    FM/AM only.



    Why is it better?

    If you use 'online delivery', you are limited to places where you have
    an Internet connection and if you use wireless broadband, using your
    mobile phone perhaps, you will not have the advantage of the seamless handover between transmitter sites that DAB has.

    Online delivery is better at home, assuming you have a reasonable broadband connection. The need to vigorously compress the content falls away. DAB
    works very well in a car, providing the transmitting company has invested
    in enough transmitters, This is unfortunately not the case for some of the commercial multiplexes.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Scott@newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk to uk.tech.broadcast on Mon Oct 6 13:21:49 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast

    On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 12:14:32 +0100, JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> wrote:

    On 06/10/2025 11:53, Scott wrote:
    The better solution is to move away from DAB to online delivery, which
    is what they are encouraging anyway. I'm looking at a Ruark R1S Smart
    Radio to replace my bedside radio. (It's a bit expensive but I have
    the bonus of a John Lewis voucher to use). My car at the moment is
    FM/AM only.

    Why is it better?

    I meant better in my house (for the reasons Tweed has stated). I don't
    have DAB in the car.

    If you use 'online delivery', you are limited to places where you have
    an Internet connection and if you use wireless broadband, using your
    mobile phone perhaps, you will not have the advantage of the seamless >handover between transmitter sites that DAB has.

    See above.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark Carver@mark@invalid.com to uk.tech.broadcast on Mon Oct 6 14:18:22 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.tech.broadcast

    On 06/10/2025 12:37, Tweed wrote:
    JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> wrote:
    On 06/10/2025 11:53, Scott wrote:
    The better solution is to move away from DAB to online delivery, which
    is what they are encouraging anyway. I'm looking at a Ruark R1S Smart
    Radio to replace my bedside radio. (It's a bit expensive but I have
    the bonus of a John Lewis voucher to use). My car at the moment is
    FM/AM only.



    Why is it better?

    If you use 'online delivery', you are limited to places where you have
    an Internet connection and if you use wireless broadband, using your
    mobile phone perhaps, you will not have the advantage of the seamless
    handover between transmitter sites that DAB has.

    Online delivery is better at home, assuming you have a reasonable broadband connection.
    Yes. I've not used DAB or FM at home now for over five years. All the
    loft aerial does now, is warm up the 75R load of the receiver's RF input
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2