| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 23 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 46:53:37 |
| Calls: | 583 |
| Files: | 1,138 |
| Messages: | 111,071 |
Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:
I still have my own opinion regarding who "." is.
(sigh) I've posted the relevant message-id's, just look at
the headers:
"." is using paganini.bofh.team posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A"
posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A" was used
in <XnsB316A48DDB3A5PantyheadPoorHouse@94.23.43.182>
Posted by "Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net>" in the poetry froup.
If that isn't him, then someone is forging him...and has been for
a long time.
BTW, that posting-account is used for all kinds of trolling.
The _only_ way he wouldn't be implicated is if Ivo, for some
idiotic reason, sets the posting-account the same for more than
two people. That would be extraordinarily stupid, and I think
we can discount such an oddball idea. (Ivo isn't stupid.)
[...]
Gerk's modus operandi when forging is to copy a full set of headers
from a genuine post into his forgery post. It was his proud boast that
he could post a perfect forgery - something I challenged him to do
(he failed). It's for exactly that reason that my registered FQDN
appears in my E-S Injection-Info header; it's the one header that is unforgeable on bona fide newsservers.
If something like that is happening here, it could explain the paganini posting-account details being duplicated. I'm not accusing Gerk of
being the perp but if he can do that, so can others. In the final
analysis, pretty much anybody can be forged quite easily and the
forgery will pass all but the closest inspection.
Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:
Sn!pe,
I realize that maybe you don't have an easy way to look up a message
by message-id. Here's a simple bash script that works on a Mac. It
uses news.mixmin.net because they allow reading w/out authentication:
[...]
Thank you for that but it's not needed, I use Howard Knight's
Usenet lookup service: <https://al.howardknight.net/>
What I could use is unlimited time to go chasing my tail
around strange froups and stranger people but I don't.
Life is too short for this silly game. My object in all of this
is simply to persuade my stalker to leave uk.rec.sheds alone.
He knows that I'm pretty sure that I know who he is.
Now is the time he should take his ball and go home.
Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:
[...]
And I think if you, Sn!pe, and I were communicating better,
this would all get cleared up. I don't have time to be cagey
about this anymore, so I offer the following MID for your inspection:
<XnsB316A48DDB3A5PantyheadPoorHouse@94.23.43.182>
I don't have the luxury of being nicey-nicey about this, they
are causing disruption that could have cost real people real
money. They probably don't care, because they've been on
the other end of a flawsuit before.
That appears to be somebody else's feud; I don't see its relevance
to what's happening here. Do you have any proof that Cujo is "." ?
That's my sole interest in this nonsense.
I still have my own opinion regarding who "." is.
In article <1rhfdwn.1fzrbvu1w6zow6N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, snipeco.2@gmail.com says...
Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:
[...]
And I think if you, Sn!pe, and I were communicating better,
this would all get cleared up. I don't have time to be cagey
about this anymore, so I offer the following MID for your inspection:
<XnsB316A48DDB3A5PantyheadPoorHouse@94.23.43.182>
I don't have the luxury of being nicey-nicey about this, they
are causing disruption that could have cost real people real
money. They probably don't care, because they've been on
the other end of a flawsuit before.
That appears to be somebody else's feud; I don't see its relevance
to what's happening here. Do you have any proof that Cujo is "." ?
That's my sole interest in this nonsense.
I still have my own opinion regarding who "." is.
On 21/08/2025 19:36, zevon (CASA) wrote:
In article <1rhfdwn.1fzrbvu1w6zow6N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, snipeco.2@gmail.com says...
I still have my own opinion regarding who "." is.
It's Casa. He uses several different servers.
Casa are you aware that you appended Skeeters xface code on your forged
user agent header? That is just one of the things that give you away.
I'm done now. Back to lurking.
[from uk.rec.sheds]
Corvus Corax <no@spam.invalid> wrote:
On 21/08/2025 19:36, zevon (CASA) wrote:
In article <1rhfdwn.1fzrbvu1w6zow6N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>,
snipeco.2@gmail.com says...
Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:
[...]
And I think if you, Sn!pe, and I were communicating better,
this would all get cleared up. I don't have time to be cagey
about this anymore, so I offer the following MID for your inspection: >>>>>
<XnsB316A48DDB3A5PantyheadPoorHouse@94.23.43.182>
I don't have the luxury of being nicey-nicey about this, they
are causing disruption that could have cost real people real
money. They probably don't care, because they've been on
the other end of a flawsuit before.
That appears to be somebody else's feud; I don't see its relevance
to what's happening here. Do you have any proof that Cujo is "." ?
That's my sole interest in this nonsense.
I still have my own opinion regarding who "." is.
It's Casa. He uses several different servers.
Casa are you aware that you appended Skeeters xface code on your forged
user agent header? That is just one of the things that give you away.
I'm done now. Back to lurking.
Thank you for your input, Corvus.
I've returned this thread to alt.checkmate.