• Even more OT: Can anyone here help me with google vacation rentals etc.?

    From Paul Carmichael@wibbleypants@gmail.com to uk.rec.motorcycles on Sat Aug 16 09:46:09 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.rec.motorcycles

    Got a serious problem with google listings and I actually pay money which
    is not giving me any return.

    I think the problem is a conflict between my old "google my business"
    listing and my "google vacation rentals" listing (which I don't control).

    TIA.
    --
    Paul.

    https://paulc.es

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ace@Ace@ch.com to uk.rec.motorcycles on Sat Aug 16 14:07:11 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.rec.motorcycles

    On 16 Aug 2025 09:46:09 GMT, Paul Carmichael <wibbleypants@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    Got a serious problem with google listings and I actually pay money which
    is not giving me any return.

    I think the problem is a conflict between my old "google my business" >listing and my "google vacation rentals" listing (which I don't control).

    Sorry, can't help. Never been tempted by their paid listings, airbnb
    and booking, together with the metasearch sites, have the limited
    (i.e. my properties are unique enough not to have a lot of
    like-for-like competion) market covered for those searching for
    specific bedrooms, dates etc. and the free google business listing
    shows up in maps for people browsing it that way.

    What advantages do/did you envisage from the vacation rentals listing?
    --
    Ace
    http://www.chaletbeauroc.com/
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul Carmichael@wibbleypants@gmail.com to uk.rec.motorcycles on Sat Aug 16 13:31:06 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.rec.motorcycles

    El Sat, 16 Aug 2025 14:07:11 +0200, Ace escribi||:

    On 16 Aug 2025 09:46:09 GMT, Paul Carmichael <wibbleypants@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    Got a serious problem with google listings and I actually pay money
    which is not giving me any return.

    I think the problem is a conflict between my old "google my business" >>listing and my "google vacation rentals" listing (which I don't
    control).

    Sorry, can't help. Never been tempted by their paid listings, airbnb and booking, together with the metasearch sites, have the limited (i.e. my properties are unique enough not to have a lot of like-for-like
    competion) market covered for those searching for specific bedrooms,
    dates etc. and the free google business listing shows up in maps for
    people browsing it that way.

    What advantages do/did you envisage from the vacation rentals listing?


    Direct bookings. My original google page gets hijacked by the agencies.
    The GVR listing leads to direct bookings (through the channel manager/
    booking engine - in my case freetobook).
    --
    Paul.

    https://paulc.es

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ace@Ace@ch.com to uk.rec.motorcycles on Sat Aug 16 18:19:06 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.rec.motorcycles

    On 16 Aug 2025 13:31:06 GMT, Paul Carmichael <wibbleypants@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    El Sat, 16 Aug 2025 14:07:11 +0200, Ace escribi<:
    What advantages do/did you envisage from the vacation rentals listing?


    Direct bookings. My original google page gets hijacked by the agencies.
    The GVR listing leads to direct bookings (through the channel manager/ >booking engine - in my case freetobook).

    Intersting. My google entry doesn't have the 'check availability'
    button to my other channels like yours does, so there's no option but
    to click the website link, thence booking direct through that.

    I'm getting something like 60% direct bookings these days, although of
    course that includes repeat guests, which proportion of course has
    grown over time.

    Do you know how/why your booking and travelmyth entries are being
    shown automatically? I don't recall even having to disable it, but
    maybe there is a way?
    --
    Ace
    http://www.chaletbeauroc.com/
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark Olson@olsonm@tiny.invalid to uk.rec.motorcycles on Sat Aug 16 20:53:07 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.rec.motorcycles

    Ace <Ace@ch.com> wrote:
    On 16 Aug 2025 13:31:06 GMT, Paul Carmichael <wibbleypants@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    El Sat, 16 Aug 2025 14:07:11 +0200, Ace escribi<:
    What advantages do/did you envisage from the vacation rentals listing?


    Direct bookings. My original google page gets hijacked by the agencies.

    Can you explain this like I'm a numpty?

    When I look at your property on Google Maps, I see a "Check
    Availability' button, and a booking.com link, plus the link to
    your own direct booking website (https://elpatiofuentedepiedra.es/).
    Clicking on the 'Check Availability' button throws up only booking.com
    as an option.

    I assume that since booking.com is able to list your property, you
    are willing to accept bookings through them. Is this under duress(?),
    or simply another way to get your property noticed, presumably at
    some percentage of the booking paid to booking.com. I suppose what I
    am saying is, I don't understand what you mean by "My original google
    page gets hijacked by the agencies.".

    The GVR listing leads to direct bookings (through the channel manager/ >>booking engine - in my case freetobook).

    Intersting. My google entry doesn't have the 'check availability'
    button to my other channels like yours does, so there's no option but
    to click the website link, thence booking direct through that.

    I'm getting something like 60% direct bookings these days, although of
    course that includes repeat guests, which proportion of course has
    grown over time.

    Do you know how/why your booking and travelmyth entries are being
    shown automatically? I don't recall even having to disable it, but
    maybe there is a way?

    I'm seriously thinking of booking a stay at Paul's place, winter
    season, naturally.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ace@Ace@ch.com to uk.rec.motorcycles on Sat Aug 16 23:19:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.rec.motorcycles

    On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 20:53:07 -0000 (UTC), Mark Olson
    <olsonm@tiny.invalid> wrote:

    Ace <Ace@ch.com> wrote:
    On 16 Aug 2025 13:31:06 GMT, Paul Carmichael <wibbleypants@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    Direct bookings. My original google page gets hijacked by the agencies.

    Can you explain this like I'm a numpty?

    When I look at your property on Google Maps, I see a "Check
    Availability' button, and a booking.com link, plus the link to
    your own direct booking website (https://elpatiofuentedepiedra.es/).
    Clicking on the 'Check Availability' button throws up only booking.com
    as an option.

    I assume that since booking.com is able to list your property, you
    are willing to accept bookings through them. Is this under duress(?),
    or simply another way to get your property noticed, presumably at
    some percentage of the booking paid to booking.com. I suppose what I
    am saying is, I don't understand what you mean by "My original google
    page gets hijacked by the agencies.".

    booking.com (and other 'channels') charge a significant commission,
    like 15% or more, so while of course one wants to be listed there,
    given that they're the most likely source of clients, it's much
    preferable to use your own website/booking engine where you can accept
    direct bookings and avoid the commission.

    For whatever reason Paul's Google Business entry is automatically
    including his entries on those channels, so punters are likely to just
    click those. I think that's what he means by it being 'hijacked'.

    On mine they're not listed, so my own website is the only thing they
    can click. In an ideal world one would include one's own booking
    engine directly on that GMaps landing page, but I don't know of any
    way to do that.
    --
    Ace
    http://www.chaletbeauroc.com/
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From wessie@willnotwork@tesco.net to uk.rec.motorcycles on Sat Aug 16 21:42:19 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.rec.motorcycles

    Ace <Ace@ch.com> wrote in
    news:62t1akhp95tvu5nfc7nscj7kossgs6vf79@4ax.com:


    On mine they're not listed, so my own website is the only thing they
    can click. In an ideal world one would include one's own booking
    engine directly on that GMaps landing page, but I don't know of any
    way to do that.


    it is certainly possible as I often see a direct to hotel's own booking
    site link on Gmaps. Although, I wonder if that means a commission to
    google. Not just the chains like Accor and Logis but independents,
    especially in Spain where many are ditching the likes of booking .com due
    to the high volume of scam emails requesting "card validation."

    Once located asa candidate, I usually seek out the hotel's website by other means to see if they have any incentives to book direct such as a lower
    rate, free breakfast or better cancellation terms. Then compare that to booking via my hotels dot com incentive scheme.

    Sounds a faff, and it can be, but as DFV for the old gimmer UKRM group, I
    book a lot of hotel rooms so like to get a good deal to earn brownie points from the group or reward points for me :)
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ace@Ace@ch.com to uk.rec.motorcycles on Sat Aug 16 23:59:30 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.rec.motorcycles

    On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 21:42:19 -0000 (UTC), wessie
    <willnotwork@tesco.net> wrote:

    Ace <Ace@ch.com> wrote in
    news:62t1akhp95tvu5nfc7nscj7kossgs6vf79@4ax.com:


    On mine they're not listed, so my own website is the only thing they
    can click. In an ideal world one would include one's own booking
    engine directly on that GMaps landing page, but I don't know of any
    way to do that.


    it is certainly possible as I often see a direct to hotel's own booking
    site link on Gmaps.

    A link is one thing (which I have) but the date and availability
    appearing directly on the Gmap entry, like Paul's does for his two
    non-direct channels, is simething else. I'm assuming that this is what
    he's trying to achieve by using the paid-for Google vacation rental
    thing.

    Once located asa candidate, I usually seek out the hotel's website by other >means to see if they have any incentives to book direct such as a lower >rate, free breakfast or better cancellation terms. Then compare that to >booking via my hotels dot com incentive scheme.

    I'm always astonished when people do not do this. I set prices and
    markups to roughly equalise for the commission (including credit card commissions that I normally have to pay on direct bookings) such that
    I receive about the same regardless of channel, but clearly I'd rather
    that the guests were getting the saving by avoiding the commission in
    the first place.

    Sounds a faff, and it can be, but as DFV for the old gimmer UKRM group, I >book a lot of hotel rooms so like to get a good deal to earn brownie points >from the group or reward points for me :)

    Well quite.
    --
    Ace
    http://www.chaletbeauroc.com/
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark Olson@olsonm@tiny.invalid to uk.rec.motorcycles on Sat Aug 16 23:32:11 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.rec.motorcycles

    Ace <Ace@ch.com> wrote:
    On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 21:42:19 -0000 (UTC), wessie
    <willnotwork@tesco.net> wrote:

    Ace <Ace@ch.com> wrote in
    news:62t1akhp95tvu5nfc7nscj7kossgs6vf79@4ax.com:

    [snip]

    Once located asa candidate, I usually seek out the hotel's website by other >>means to see if they have any incentives to book direct such as a lower >>rate, free breakfast or better cancellation terms. Then compare that to >>booking via my hotels dot com incentive scheme.

    I do the same, although my default go-to is booking.com (currently
    Genius Level 3!).

    I'm always astonished when people do not do this. I set prices and
    markups to roughly equalise for the commission (including credit card commissions that I normally have to pay on direct bookings) such that
    I receive about the same regardless of channel, but clearly I'd rather
    that the guests were getting the saving by avoiding the commission in
    the first place.

    So, are you allowed by booking.com's rules to charge less on your
    own direct booking site vs. the rate shown on booking.com? I would
    have thought that would not be in their interest.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ace@Ace@ch.com to uk.rec.motorcycles on Sun Aug 17 08:54:17 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.rec.motorcycles

    On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 23:32:11 -0000 (UTC), Mark Olson
    <olsonm@tiny.invalid> wrote:


    So, are you allowed by booking.com's rules to charge less on your
    own direct booking site vs. the rate shown on booking.com?

    Err, yeah. Too right.

    I would have thought that would not be in their interest.

    It's my business, not their's.
    --
    Ace
    http://www.chaletbeauroc.com/
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From wessie@willnotwork@tesco.net to uk.rec.motorcycles on Sun Aug 17 08:12:42 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.rec.motorcycles

    Ace <Ace@ch.com> wrote in
    news:tav1akhite568i580ohtiak49gku2rrqpc@4ax.com:

    On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 21:42:19 -0000 (UTC), wessie

    it is certainly possible as I often see a direct to hotel's own
    booking site link on Gmaps.

    A link is one thing (which I have) but the date and availability
    appearing directly on the Gmap entry, like Paul's does for his two
    non-direct channels, is simething else. I'm assuming that this is what
    he's trying to achieve by using the paid-for Google vacation rental
    thing.


    I was referring to the latter case where a "direct to hotel"[1] price is
    shown in the list with the booking sites. Separate to the section on Gmaps that gives a URL for the hotel.

    [1] usually a 3rd party service like reservit not the actual hotel's own website, unless a big group like Accor, Parador etc
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ace@Ace@ch.com to uk.rec.motorcycles on Sun Aug 17 11:09:23 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.rec.motorcycles

    On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 08:12:42 -0000 (UTC), wessie
    <willnotwork@tesco.net> wrote:

    Ace <Ace@ch.com> wrote in
    news:tav1akhite568i580ohtiak49gku2rrqpc@4ax.com:

    On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 21:42:19 -0000 (UTC), wessie

    it is certainly possible as I often see a direct to hotel's own
    booking site link on Gmaps.

    A link is one thing (which I have) but the date and availability
    appearing directly on the Gmap entry, like Paul's does for his two
    non-direct channels, is simething else. I'm assuming that this is what
    he's trying to achieve by using the paid-for Google vacation rental
    thing.


    I was referring to the latter case where a "direct to hotel"[1] price is >shown in the list with the booking sites. Separate to the section on Gmaps >that gives a URL for the hotel.

    [1] usually a 3rd party service like reservit not the actual hotel's own >website, unless a big group like Accor, Parador etc

    Right, and that's what appears on Paul's page for two such channels,
    which I think is what his "hijacked" is referring to, but does not
    show on mine.

    Getting that to link directly with your own booking widget but not the
    other channels would be the best solution, or even to show them all
    with your direct one being cheaper, but I can't see a way to achieve
    it.
    --
    Ace
    http://www.chaletbeauroc.com/
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul Carmichael@wibbleypants@gmail.com to uk.rec.motorcycles on Sun Aug 17 10:56:09 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.rec.motorcycles

    El Sat, 16 Aug 2025 23:19:45 +0200, Ace escribi||:

    On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 20:53:07 -0000 (UTC), Mark Olson
    <olsonm@tiny.invalid> wrote:

    Ace <Ace@ch.com> wrote:
    On 16 Aug 2025 13:31:06 GMT, Paul Carmichael <wibbleypants@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    Direct bookings. My original google page gets hijacked by the
    agencies.

    Can you explain this like I'm a numpty?

    When I look at your property on Google Maps, I see a "Check
    Availability' button, and a booking.com link, plus the link to your own >>direct booking website (https://elpatiofuentedepiedra.es/). Clicking on
    the 'Check Availability' button throws up only booking.com as an option.

    I assume that since booking.com is able to list your property, you are >>willing to accept bookings through them. Is this under duress(?), or
    simply another way to get your property noticed, presumably at some >>percentage of the booking paid to booking.com. I suppose what I am
    saying is, I don't understand what you mean by "My original google page >>gets hijacked by the agencies.".

    booking.com (and other 'channels') charge a significant commission, like
    15% or more, so while of course one wants to be listed there, given that they're the most likely source of clients, it's much preferable to use
    your own website/booking engine where you can accept direct bookings and avoid the commission.

    For whatever reason Paul's Google Business entry is automatically
    including his entries on those channels, so punters are likely to just
    click those. I think that's what he means by it being 'hijacked'.

    On mine they're not listed, so my own website is the only thing they can click. In an ideal world one would include one's own booking engine
    directly on that GMaps landing page, but I don't know of any way to do
    that.


    I have another google listing which doesn't show BC etc. first. It shows
    my direct booking (through freetobook) first (and clearly cheapest),
    before the other avenues.

    If you search in Google Vacation Rentals (not hotels), you will (should)
    see it.
    --
    Paul.

    https://paulc.es

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul Carmichael@wibbleypants@gmail.com to uk.rec.motorcycles on Sun Aug 17 10:59:48 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.rec.motorcycles

    El Sat, 16 Aug 2025 23:32:11 +0000, Mark Olson escribi||:

    So, are you allowed by booking.com's rules to charge less on your own
    direct booking site vs. the rate shown on booking.com? I would have
    thought that would not be in their interest.

    One used to have to sign a price parity agreement with BC, but that has
    been declared illegal in Europe. They got fined a ton of money. I charge
    BC punters 20% extra to cover commission.
    --
    Paul.

    https://paulc.es

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul Carmichael@wibbleypants@gmail.com to uk.rec.motorcycles on Sun Aug 17 11:04:16 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.rec.motorcycles

    El Sun, 17 Aug 2025 11:09:23 +0200, Ace escribi||:

    Getting that to link directly with your own booking widget but not the
    other channels would be the best solution, or even to show them all with
    your direct one being cheaper, but I can't see a way to achieve it.


    Which is what I pay freetobook for. They create a new google listing and
    they pay google to show that first for the relevant property category.

    I'm thinking of dumping my old google profile/listing, as that looks like
    the only way to get around this.

    Unless somebody shows up that does understand how it all works. I've tried contacting google, but you can probably guess where that got me.

    Trouble is, my old profile has lots of reviews going back 10 years.
    --
    Paul.

    https://paulc.es

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark Olson@olsonm@tiny.invalid to uk.rec.motorcycles on Sun Aug 17 13:53:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.rec.motorcycles

    Paul Carmichael <wibbleypants@gmail.com> wrote:
    El Sat, 16 Aug 2025 23:32:11 +0000, Mark Olson escribi<:

    So, are you allowed by booking.com's rules to charge less on your own
    direct booking site vs. the rate shown on booking.com? I would have
    thought that would not be in their interest.

    One used to have to sign a price parity agreement with BC, but that has
    been declared illegal in Europe. They got fined a ton of money. I charge
    BC punters 20% extra to cover commission.

    Didn't know that. I wouldn't be surprised if they are still doing
    that in the USA...

    Apropos, has anyone else navigated a small self-drive boat [1]
    next to the Booking.com HQ? The 2-hour boat excursion was one of the
    highlights of my trip to Amsterdam last December. I'm not sure I would
    want to do this during the high season due to canal traffic, but in
    December, it was a great way to see the city. We were very lucky to
    have a friend aboard (pictured) who was an absolutely amazing guide,
    a polymath who lectured on the history of Amsterdam.

    https://photos.app.goo.gl/GvYZd1cu4DaUHqWw8

    [1] https://mokumboot.nl/en/home/

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark Olson@olsonm@tiny.invalid to uk.rec.motorcycles on Sun Aug 17 16:18:38 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.rec.motorcycles

    Ace <Ace@ch.com> wrote:
    On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 23:32:11 -0000 (UTC), Mark Olson
    <olsonm@tiny.invalid> wrote:


    So, are you allowed by booking.com's rules to charge less on your
    own direct booking site vs. the rate shown on booking.com?

    Err, yeah. Too right.

    I would have thought that would not be in their interest.

    It's my business, not their's.

    I'm on your side here.

    Thanks to Paul for explaining that BC did used to have such a policy
    but thankfully it was forced to undo it.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2