• Glasgow trip report - infrastructure issues

    From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 10:02:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    [I may write another report about the social issues of seat reservations
    and how well people respected them]

    Early Monday morning and I'd already seen on Facebook that the council
    had withdrawn the pay-by-phone app from their car park near the station.
    So coins only (u4 a day).

    This is the car park I'd used before with an app, which asked for how
    long I was planning on staying, but didn't mention what the units were.
    As it's long stay, charging per day, I said "7" (a week's holiday). Of
    course, they don't say when days end, is it midnight or 4am?

    So next day, back then, I got a text on my phone to where I was on
    holiday abroad saying "Thanks for paying for 7 minutes parking, which we rounded up to a day, but if you want to stay longer you need to pay some more".

    Walking from there to the station, around the Tesco store, I thought it
    might be prudent to get some cash (notes) from the one remaining ATM of
    the four they used to have (one now boarded up at the petrol station and
    three by the entrance). It was out of action.

    The station barriers scanned my printed PDF QR-coded ticket
    successfully. There was an inbound passenger unsuccessfully rummaging on
    their phone for their ticket to be let out of the barriers.

    Train was due to depart from the island platform, so I trudged round
    there via the only means of access - an underpass. Just as I got there,
    they announced a platform change to #1. OK, so back via the underpass.

    The XC to Stansted timed at the exact same clockface (when they were
    both Central Trains, the crews would swap from one to the other) was
    cancelled due to signal problems somewhere between Leicester and
    Peterborough. Several passengers getting quite agitated about missing
    their flights, and the platform staff suggested they take a taxi (at
    their own expense, I presume). Central Trains used to say pax should
    plan to arrive at Stansted 2hrs before the last check-in time (ie 3hrs
    before the flight) to paper over cracks like that.

    EMT train to Peterborough (later to Liverpool) was OK, and had a chat
    with the gripper about his pay-per-scan bounty.

    Lift from the platform at Peterborough broken, and pax advised to use
    the ex-Royal_Mail overbridge at the other end of the platforms. Queue
    for the two unisex toilet cubicles on that platform quite long, so I
    waited until on my departure platform.

    Thameslink southbound borked due to "Shortage of train crew".

    First Edinburgh train "delayed due to urgent bridge works", which later transpired to be in the Durham area.

    Fatality on the Euston line causing havoc with three consecutive Glasgow trains cancelled, and pax told to try already oversubscribed Kings Cross
    to Edinburgh services.

    The buffet at Peterborough wouldn't sell alcohol before 10am (it was
    clearly going to be impossible to get to an on-train buffet what with
    the overcrowding). "Is this a new thing" I asked. "No", they lied, "it's always been like that".

    My booked train (no reservation, but the ticket said "09:48, arr EDI
    13:22") was on time but full and standing, and only coach C was
    "unreserved", but that was partly a lie as well, because half of it
    *was* reserved. I propped myself up on the end of a table, with bags in
    the aisle (because all the overhead racks were rammed full).

    Much hilarity ensued with people turning up with reservations, and
    people in the seats refusing to budge, but that'll be the topic of a
    later posting.

    Quite a few tannoy announcements, but entirely inaudible. Next stop was supposed to be York (and so it remained on the PIS) but it did an
    unscheduled stop at Doncaster.

    At which point several people opportunistically boarded and proceeded to
    barge their way down the aisle. One managed to kick me firmly on the
    shin in the process, to which I complained. Their response "I did say
    PLEASE".

    Overall on the trip I counted about five instances of people treading on
    my toes, none of whom were the slightest bit apologetic. Given I have
    gout, it's not a trivial assault.

    The train got progressively later, eventually being I think 28 minutes
    late. Which meant I missed my connection. The only train crew we saw was someone coming through asking for passengers to Inverness, and initially promising their connection would be held, but later saying "no it won't
    be". Quite a bit of delay-repay there, I'll wager.

    At Waverley I was still looking for cash, but all three ATMs in the
    waiting area next to the Brewdog pub were broken. Passengers on the
    still full-and-standing train had been waved thought the barriers on
    arrival, otherwise there'd have probably been a riot.

    Scotrail Express to Glasgow was less crowded (but I did recognise
    several pax from the KGX train). Another chat with friendly gripper
    about pay-per-scan-bounty.

    Luckily(?) it was two minutes late, hence I have a 32 minute delay repay
    to claim. It would have been irritating had it been one minute early.

    Met with the person I had travelled to see, and soon waiting for the
    Express back to Edinburgh. They didn't announce the platform until 4
    minutes before departure, which created a considerable scrum at the
    barriers.

    At Waverley, the London train was at an unbarriered platform some
    distance from te concourse, and with my reserved seat in Coach J, it
    felt like I'd already walked halfway home. Quite lightly loaded, so reservation was moot. No train crew seen all the way back to
    Peterborough.

    ... Where they'd fixed the lift to the far island platform, but failed
    to remove signage warning it was broken.

    And the departure board was stuffed with delays.

    Thameslink still borked, with one Horsham train cancelled "Problems at
    depot" and another "Delayed due to a points failure".

    20:52 to Leeds "11 late, due to points failure"
    20:53 to Birmingham "18 late, due to train crew delayed by earlier
    delays"
    21:08 to Kings Cross "Delayed due to points failure" and
    21:16 to Stansted "8 late due to a fault on the train earlier"

    I got on that one, which had been quite nicely refurbished (and the
    outside was very white, rather than XC colours).

    But the wifi wouldn't connect to my laptop and the disabled loo in my
    carriage was, err, disabled (locked out of use). No train crew gripping,
    and the barriers at my destination locked open because everyone had gone
    home.

    Nobody, all day, asked to see my railcard.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ulf Kutzner@user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 09:17:07 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway


    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> posted:

    [I may write another report about the social issues of seat reservations
    and how well people respected them]

    Early Monday morning and I'd already seen on Facebook that the council
    had withdrawn the pay-by-phone app from their car park near the station.
    So coins only (-u4 a day).

    This is the car park I'd used before with an app, which asked for how
    long I was planning on staying, but didn't mention what the units were.
    As it's long stay, charging per day, I said "7" (a week's holiday). Of course, they don't say when days end, is it midnight or 4am?

    So next day, back then, I got a text on my phone to where I was on
    holiday abroad saying "Thanks for paying for 7 minutes parking, which we rounded up to a day, but if you want to stay longer you need to pay some more".

    Walking from there to the station, around the Tesco store, I thought it might be prudent to get some cash (notes) from the one remaining ATM of
    the four they used to have (one now boarded up at the petrol station and three by the entrance). It was out of action.



    At Waverley I was still looking for cash, but all three ATMs in the
    waiting area next to the Brewdog pub were broken.

    Should have stored some cash at home and taken part of it with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 10:15:00 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    [I may write another report about the social issues of seat reservations
    and how well people respected them]

    Early Monday morning and I'd already seen on Facebook that the council
    had withdrawn the pay-by-phone app from their car park near the station.
    So coins only (-u4 a day).

    This is the car park I'd used before with an app, which asked for how
    long I was planning on staying, but didn't mention what the units were.
    As it's long stay, charging per day, I said "7" (a week's holiday). Of course, they don't say when days end, is it midnight or 4am?

    So next day, back then, I got a text on my phone to where I was on
    holiday abroad saying "Thanks for paying for 7 minutes parking, which we rounded up to a day, but if you want to stay longer you need to pay some more".

    Walking from there to the station, around the Tesco store, I thought it might be prudent to get some cash (notes) from the one remaining ATM of
    the four they used to have (one now boarded up at the petrol station and three by the entrance). It was out of action.

    The station barriers scanned my printed PDF QR-coded ticket
    successfully. There was an inbound passenger unsuccessfully rummaging on their phone for their ticket to be let out of the barriers.

    Train was due to depart from the island platform, so I trudged round
    there via the only means of access - an underpass. Just as I got there,
    they announced a platform change to #1. OK, so back via the underpass.

    The XC to Stansted timed at the exact same clockface (when they were
    both Central Trains, the crews would swap from one to the other) was cancelled due to signal problems somewhere between Leicester and Peterborough. Several passengers getting quite agitated about missing
    their flights, and the platform staff suggested they take a taxi (at
    their own expense, I presume). Central Trains used to say pax should
    plan to arrive at Stansted 2hrs before the last check-in time (ie 3hrs before the flight) to paper over cracks like that.

    EMT train to Peterborough (later to Liverpool) was OK, and had a chat
    with the gripper about his pay-per-scan bounty.

    Lift from the platform at Peterborough broken, and pax advised to use
    the ex-Royal_Mail overbridge at the other end of the platforms. Queue
    for the two unisex toilet cubicles on that platform quite long, so I
    waited until on my departure platform.

    Thameslink southbound borked due to "Shortage of train crew".

    First Edinburgh train "delayed due to urgent bridge works", which later transpired to be in the Durham area.

    Fatality on the Euston line causing havoc with three consecutive Glasgow trains cancelled, and pax told to try already oversubscribed Kings Cross
    to Edinburgh services.

    The buffet at Peterborough wouldn't sell alcohol before 10am (it was
    clearly going to be impossible to get to an on-train buffet what with
    the overcrowding). "Is this a new thing" I asked. "No", they lied, "it's always been like that".

    My booked train (no reservation, but the ticket said "09:48, arr EDI
    13:22") was on time but full and standing, and only coach C was "unreserved", but that was partly a lie as well, because half of it
    *was* reserved. I propped myself up on the end of a table, with bags in
    the aisle (because all the overhead racks were rammed full).

    Much hilarity ensued with people turning up with reservations, and
    people in the seats refusing to budge, but that'll be the topic of a
    later posting.

    Quite a few tannoy announcements, but entirely inaudible. Next stop was supposed to be York (and so it remained on the PIS) but it did an unscheduled stop at Doncaster.

    At which point several people opportunistically boarded and proceeded to barge their way down the aisle. One managed to kick me firmly on the
    shin in the process, to which I complained. Their response "I did say PLEASE".

    Overall on the trip I counted about five instances of people treading on
    my toes, none of whom were the slightest bit apologetic. Given I have
    gout, it's not a trivial assault.

    The train got progressively later, eventually being I think 28 minutes
    late. Which meant I missed my connection. The only train crew we saw was someone coming through asking for passengers to Inverness, and initially promising their connection would be held, but later saying "no it won't
    be". Quite a bit of delay-repay there, I'll wager.

    At Waverley I was still looking for cash, but all three ATMs in the
    waiting area next to the Brewdog pub were broken. Passengers on the
    still full-and-standing train had been waved thought the barriers on arrival, otherwise there'd have probably been a riot.

    Scotrail Express to Glasgow was less crowded (but I did recognise
    several pax from the KGX train). Another chat with friendly gripper
    about pay-per-scan-bounty.

    Luckily(?) it was two minutes late, hence I have a 32 minute delay repay
    to claim. It would have been irritating had it been one minute early.

    Met with the person I had travelled to see, and soon waiting for the
    Express back to Edinburgh. They didn't announce the platform until 4
    minutes before departure, which created a considerable scrum at the barriers.

    At Waverley, the London train was at an unbarriered platform some
    distance from te concourse, and with my reserved seat in Coach J, it
    felt like I'd already walked halfway home. Quite lightly loaded, so reservation was moot. No train crew seen all the way back to
    Peterborough.

    ... Where they'd fixed the lift to the far island platform, but failed
    to remove signage warning it was broken.

    And the departure board was stuffed with delays.

    Thameslink still borked, with one Horsham train cancelled "Problems at depot" and another "Delayed due to a points failure".

    20:52 to Leeds "11 late, due to points failure"
    20:53 to Birmingham "18 late, due to train crew delayed by earlier
    delays"
    21:08 to Kings Cross "Delayed due to points failure" and
    21:16 to Stansted "8 late due to a fault on the train earlier"

    I got on that one, which had been quite nicely refurbished (and the
    outside was very white, rather than XC colours).

    But the wifi wouldn't connect to my laptop and the disabled loo in my carriage was, err, disabled (locked out of use). No train crew gripping,
    and the barriers at my destination locked open because everyone had gone home.

    Nobody, all day, asked to see my railcard.

    Did you go first or second class?

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 11:23:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <1755249427-2991@newsgrouper.org>, at 09:17:07 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, Ulf Kutzner <user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid> remarked:

    At Waverley I was still looking for cash, but all three ATMs in the
    waiting area next to the Brewdog pub were broken.

    Should have stored some cash at home and taken part of it with you.

    Luckily I did have sufficient coins to pay for the car park, but so many places now are "card only" and/or we are surrounded by people who scoff
    at "goat-herders" who want to pay with cash, I don't usually have any banknotes available.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 11:42:50 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <107n1b4$1297o$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:15:00 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    [I may write another report about the social issues of seat reservations
    and how well people respected them]

    Early Monday morning and I'd already seen on Facebook that the council
    had withdrawn the pay-by-phone app from their car park near the station.
    So coins only (u4 a day).

    This is the car park I'd used before with an app, which asked for how
    long I was planning on staying, but didn't mention what the units were.
    As it's long stay, charging per day, I said "7" (a week's holiday). Of
    course, they don't say when days end, is it midnight or 4am?

    So next day, back then, I got a text on my phone to where I was on
    holiday abroad saying "Thanks for paying for 7 minutes parking, which we
    rounded up to a day, but if you want to stay longer you need to pay some
    more".

    Walking from there to the station, around the Tesco store, I thought it
    might be prudent to get some cash (notes) from the one remaining ATM of
    the four they used to have (one now boarded up at the petrol station and
    three by the entrance). It was out of action.

    The station barriers scanned my printed PDF QR-coded ticket
    successfully. There was an inbound passenger unsuccessfully rummaging on
    their phone for their ticket to be let out of the barriers.

    Train was due to depart from the island platform, so I trudged round
    there via the only means of access - an underpass. Just as I got there,
    they announced a platform change to #1. OK, so back via the underpass.

    The XC to Stansted timed at the exact same clockface (when they were
    both Central Trains, the crews would swap from one to the other) was
    cancelled due to signal problems somewhere between Leicester and
    Peterborough. Several passengers getting quite agitated about missing
    their flights, and the platform staff suggested they take a taxi (at
    their own expense, I presume). Central Trains used to say pax should
    plan to arrive at Stansted 2hrs before the last check-in time (ie 3hrs
    before the flight) to paper over cracks like that.

    EMT train to Peterborough (later to Liverpool) was OK, and had a chat
    with the gripper about his pay-per-scan bounty.

    Lift from the platform at Peterborough broken, and pax advised to use
    the ex-Royal_Mail overbridge at the other end of the platforms. Queue
    for the two unisex toilet cubicles on that platform quite long, so I
    waited until on my departure platform.

    Thameslink southbound borked due to "Shortage of train crew".

    First Edinburgh train "delayed due to urgent bridge works", which later
    transpired to be in the Durham area.

    Fatality on the Euston line causing havoc with three consecutive Glasgow
    trains cancelled, and pax told to try already oversubscribed Kings Cross
    to Edinburgh services.

    The buffet at Peterborough wouldn't sell alcohol before 10am (it was
    clearly going to be impossible to get to an on-train buffet what with
    the overcrowding). "Is this a new thing" I asked. "No", they lied, "it's
    always been like that".

    My booked train (no reservation, but the ticket said "09:48, arr EDI
    13:22") was on time but full and standing, and only coach C was
    "unreserved", but that was partly a lie as well, because half of it
    *was* reserved. I propped myself up on the end of a table, with bags in
    the aisle (because all the overhead racks were rammed full).

    Much hilarity ensued with people turning up with reservations, and
    people in the seats refusing to budge, but that'll be the topic of a
    later posting.

    Quite a few tannoy announcements, but entirely inaudible. Next stop was
    supposed to be York (and so it remained on the PIS) but it did an
    unscheduled stop at Doncaster.

    At which point several people opportunistically boarded and proceeded to
    barge their way down the aisle. One managed to kick me firmly on the
    shin in the process, to which I complained. Their response "I did say
    PLEASE".

    Overall on the trip I counted about five instances of people treading on
    my toes, none of whom were the slightest bit apologetic. Given I have
    gout, it's not a trivial assault.

    The train got progressively later, eventually being I think 28 minutes
    late. Which meant I missed my connection. The only train crew we saw was
    someone coming through asking for passengers to Inverness, and initially
    promising their connection would be held, but later saying "no it won't
    be". Quite a bit of delay-repay there, I'll wager.

    At Waverley I was still looking for cash, but all three ATMs in the
    waiting area next to the Brewdog pub were broken. Passengers on the
    still full-and-standing train had been waved thought the barriers on
    arrival, otherwise there'd have probably been a riot.

    Scotrail Express to Glasgow was less crowded (but I did recognise
    several pax from the KGX train). Another chat with friendly gripper
    about pay-per-scan-bounty.

    Luckily(?) it was two minutes late, hence I have a 32 minute delay repay
    to claim. It would have been irritating had it been one minute early.

    Met with the person I had travelled to see, and soon waiting for the
    Express back to Edinburgh. They didn't announce the platform until 4
    minutes before departure, which created a considerable scrum at the
    barriers.

    At Waverley, the London train was at an unbarriered platform some
    distance from te concourse, and with my reserved seat in Coach J, it
    felt like I'd already walked halfway home. Quite lightly loaded, so
    reservation was moot. No train crew seen all the way back to
    Peterborough.

    ... Where they'd fixed the lift to the far island platform, but failed
    to remove signage warning it was broken.

    And the departure board was stuffed with delays.

    Thameslink still borked, with one Horsham train cancelled "Problems at
    depot" and another "Delayed due to a points failure".

    20:52 to Leeds "11 late, due to points failure"
    20:53 to Birmingham "18 late, due to train crew delayed by earlier
    delays"
    21:08 to Kings Cross "Delayed due to points failure" and
    21:16 to Stansted "8 late due to a fault on the train earlier"

    I got on that one, which had been quite nicely refurbished (and the
    outside was very white, rather than XC colours).

    But the wifi wouldn't connect to my laptop and the disabled loo in my
    carriage was, err, disabled (locked out of use). No train crew gripping,
    and the barriers at my destination locked open because everyone had gone
    home.

    Nobody, all day, asked to see my railcard.

    Did you go first or second class?

    As I was on a budget, and didn't want to commit to specific trains, it
    was Standard(sic) Class walk-up.

    Doing a search just now for the same tickets for next Monday, First
    Class would be over u250 more expensive (u130 if I was prepared to risk fixed-time singles - incidentally historically hard to find had I chosen
    Plan A to go EUS-GLA direct, but next Monday roughly the same price as
    ECML. Shame the trains were cancelled last Monday).

    Which raises an interesting question: If doing a return trip and the
    outbound train is late, could one use the return leg on a different
    train without penalty? There seems to be an assumption in the system
    that you'd be going out and back on different days, so a delay on the
    first wouldn't impact one's ability to catch the correct train on the
    way back.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy Burns@usenet@andyburns.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 12:31:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Roland Perry wrote:

    Luckily I did have sufficient coins to pay for the car park, but so many places now are "card only" and/or we are surrounded by people who scoff
    at "goat-herders" who want to pay with cash, I don't usually have any banknotes available.

    It must be a conscious choice to not carry notes, so you shouldn't
    complain when you need some ...
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 11:42:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107n1b4$1297o$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:15:00 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    [I may write another report about the social issues of seat reservations >>> and how well people respected them]

    Early Monday morning and I'd already seen on Facebook that the council
    had withdrawn the pay-by-phone app from their car park near the station. >>> So coins only (-u4 a day).

    This is the car park I'd used before with an app, which asked for how
    long I was planning on staying, but didn't mention what the units were.
    As it's long stay, charging per day, I said "7" (a week's holiday). Of
    course, they don't say when days end, is it midnight or 4am?

    So next day, back then, I got a text on my phone to where I was on
    holiday abroad saying "Thanks for paying for 7 minutes parking, which we >>> rounded up to a day, but if you want to stay longer you need to pay some >>> more".

    Walking from there to the station, around the Tesco store, I thought it
    might be prudent to get some cash (notes) from the one remaining ATM of
    the four they used to have (one now boarded up at the petrol station and >>> three by the entrance). It was out of action.

    The station barriers scanned my printed PDF QR-coded ticket
    successfully. There was an inbound passenger unsuccessfully rummaging on >>> their phone for their ticket to be let out of the barriers.

    Train was due to depart from the island platform, so I trudged round
    there via the only means of access - an underpass. Just as I got there,
    they announced a platform change to #1. OK, so back via the underpass.

    The XC to Stansted timed at the exact same clockface (when they were
    both Central Trains, the crews would swap from one to the other) was
    cancelled due to signal problems somewhere between Leicester and
    Peterborough. Several passengers getting quite agitated about missing
    their flights, and the platform staff suggested they take a taxi (at
    their own expense, I presume). Central Trains used to say pax should
    plan to arrive at Stansted 2hrs before the last check-in time (ie 3hrs
    before the flight) to paper over cracks like that.

    EMT train to Peterborough (later to Liverpool) was OK, and had a chat
    with the gripper about his pay-per-scan bounty.

    Lift from the platform at Peterborough broken, and pax advised to use
    the ex-Royal_Mail overbridge at the other end of the platforms. Queue
    for the two unisex toilet cubicles on that platform quite long, so I
    waited until on my departure platform.

    Thameslink southbound borked due to "Shortage of train crew".

    First Edinburgh train "delayed due to urgent bridge works", which later
    transpired to be in the Durham area.

    Fatality on the Euston line causing havoc with three consecutive Glasgow >>> trains cancelled, and pax told to try already oversubscribed Kings Cross >>> to Edinburgh services.

    The buffet at Peterborough wouldn't sell alcohol before 10am (it was
    clearly going to be impossible to get to an on-train buffet what with
    the overcrowding). "Is this a new thing" I asked. "No", they lied, "it's >>> always been like that".

    My booked train (no reservation, but the ticket said "09:48, arr EDI
    13:22") was on time but full and standing, and only coach C was
    "unreserved", but that was partly a lie as well, because half of it
    *was* reserved. I propped myself up on the end of a table, with bags in
    the aisle (because all the overhead racks were rammed full).

    Much hilarity ensued with people turning up with reservations, and
    people in the seats refusing to budge, but that'll be the topic of a
    later posting.

    Quite a few tannoy announcements, but entirely inaudible. Next stop was
    supposed to be York (and so it remained on the PIS) but it did an
    unscheduled stop at Doncaster.

    At which point several people opportunistically boarded and proceeded to >>> barge their way down the aisle. One managed to kick me firmly on the
    shin in the process, to which I complained. Their response "I did say
    PLEASE".

    Overall on the trip I counted about five instances of people treading on >>> my toes, none of whom were the slightest bit apologetic. Given I have
    gout, it's not a trivial assault.

    The train got progressively later, eventually being I think 28 minutes
    late. Which meant I missed my connection. The only train crew we saw was >>> someone coming through asking for passengers to Inverness, and initially >>> promising their connection would be held, but later saying "no it won't
    be". Quite a bit of delay-repay there, I'll wager.

    At Waverley I was still looking for cash, but all three ATMs in the
    waiting area next to the Brewdog pub were broken. Passengers on the
    still full-and-standing train had been waved thought the barriers on
    arrival, otherwise there'd have probably been a riot.

    Scotrail Express to Glasgow was less crowded (but I did recognise
    several pax from the KGX train). Another chat with friendly gripper
    about pay-per-scan-bounty.

    Luckily(?) it was two minutes late, hence I have a 32 minute delay repay >>> to claim. It would have been irritating had it been one minute early.

    Met with the person I had travelled to see, and soon waiting for the
    Express back to Edinburgh. They didn't announce the platform until 4
    minutes before departure, which created a considerable scrum at the
    barriers.

    At Waverley, the London train was at an unbarriered platform some
    distance from te concourse, and with my reserved seat in Coach J, it
    felt like I'd already walked halfway home. Quite lightly loaded, so
    reservation was moot. No train crew seen all the way back to
    Peterborough.

    ... Where they'd fixed the lift to the far island platform, but failed
    to remove signage warning it was broken.

    And the departure board was stuffed with delays.

    Thameslink still borked, with one Horsham train cancelled "Problems at
    depot" and another "Delayed due to a points failure".

    20:52 to Leeds "11 late, due to points failure"
    20:53 to Birmingham "18 late, due to train crew delayed by earlier
    delays"
    21:08 to Kings Cross "Delayed due to points failure" and
    21:16 to Stansted "8 late due to a fault on the train earlier"

    I got on that one, which had been quite nicely refurbished (and the
    outside was very white, rather than XC colours).

    But the wifi wouldn't connect to my laptop and the disabled loo in my
    carriage was, err, disabled (locked out of use). No train crew gripping, >>> and the barriers at my destination locked open because everyone had gone >>> home.

    Nobody, all day, asked to see my railcard.

    Did you go first or second class?

    As I was on a budget, and didn't want to commit to specific trains, it
    was Standard(sic) Class walk-up.

    Doing a search just now for the same tickets for next Monday, First
    Class would be over -u250 more expensive (-u130 if I was prepared to risk fixed-time singles - incidentally historically hard to find had I chosen Plan A to go EUS-GLA direct, but next Monday roughly the same price as
    ECML. Shame the trains were cancelled last Monday).

    Which raises an interesting question: If doing a return trip and the outbound train is late, could one use the return leg on a different
    train without penalty? There seems to be an assumption in the system
    that you'd be going out and back on different days, so a delay on the
    first wouldn't impact one's ability to catch the correct train on the
    way back.

    Most long distance UK trains arenrCOt fit for purpose in second class, at
    least in my opinion. Far too cramped, both from the perspective of the restrictive loading gauge and the desire to shoe horn in as many seats as possible. And IrCOm sticking to second class as the nomenclature, as that is what it is. ItrCOs one reason I prefer easyJet to Glasgow. ThatrCOs cramped, but you only sit in the seat for 45 minutes. (From Birmingham)

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Scott@newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 12:47:27 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:42:53 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107n1b4$1297o$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:15:00 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    [I may write another report about the social issues of seat reservations >>>> and how well people respected them]

    Early Monday morning and I'd already seen on Facebook that the council >>>> had withdrawn the pay-by-phone app from their car park near the station. >>>> So coins only (u4 a day).

    This is the car park I'd used before with an app, which asked for how
    long I was planning on staying, but didn't mention what the units were. >>>> As it's long stay, charging per day, I said "7" (a week's holiday). Of >>>> course, they don't say when days end, is it midnight or 4am?

    So next day, back then, I got a text on my phone to where I was on
    holiday abroad saying "Thanks for paying for 7 minutes parking, which we >>>> rounded up to a day, but if you want to stay longer you need to pay some >>>> more".

    Walking from there to the station, around the Tesco store, I thought it >>>> might be prudent to get some cash (notes) from the one remaining ATM of >>>> the four they used to have (one now boarded up at the petrol station and >>>> three by the entrance). It was out of action.

    The station barriers scanned my printed PDF QR-coded ticket
    successfully. There was an inbound passenger unsuccessfully rummaging on >>>> their phone for their ticket to be let out of the barriers.

    Train was due to depart from the island platform, so I trudged round
    there via the only means of access - an underpass. Just as I got there, >>>> they announced a platform change to #1. OK, so back via the underpass. >>>>
    The XC to Stansted timed at the exact same clockface (when they were
    both Central Trains, the crews would swap from one to the other) was
    cancelled due to signal problems somewhere between Leicester and
    Peterborough. Several passengers getting quite agitated about missing
    their flights, and the platform staff suggested they take a taxi (at
    their own expense, I presume). Central Trains used to say pax should
    plan to arrive at Stansted 2hrs before the last check-in time (ie 3hrs >>>> before the flight) to paper over cracks like that.

    EMT train to Peterborough (later to Liverpool) was OK, and had a chat
    with the gripper about his pay-per-scan bounty.

    Lift from the platform at Peterborough broken, and pax advised to use
    the ex-Royal_Mail overbridge at the other end of the platforms. Queue
    for the two unisex toilet cubicles on that platform quite long, so I
    waited until on my departure platform.

    Thameslink southbound borked due to "Shortage of train crew".

    First Edinburgh train "delayed due to urgent bridge works", which later >>>> transpired to be in the Durham area.

    Fatality on the Euston line causing havoc with three consecutive Glasgow >>>> trains cancelled, and pax told to try already oversubscribed Kings Cross >>>> to Edinburgh services.

    The buffet at Peterborough wouldn't sell alcohol before 10am (it was
    clearly going to be impossible to get to an on-train buffet what with
    the overcrowding). "Is this a new thing" I asked. "No", they lied, "it's >>>> always been like that".

    My booked train (no reservation, but the ticket said "09:48, arr EDI
    13:22") was on time but full and standing, and only coach C was
    "unreserved", but that was partly a lie as well, because half of it
    *was* reserved. I propped myself up on the end of a table, with bags in >>>> the aisle (because all the overhead racks were rammed full).

    Much hilarity ensued with people turning up with reservations, and
    people in the seats refusing to budge, but that'll be the topic of a
    later posting.

    Quite a few tannoy announcements, but entirely inaudible. Next stop was >>>> supposed to be York (and so it remained on the PIS) but it did an
    unscheduled stop at Doncaster.

    At which point several people opportunistically boarded and proceeded to >>>> barge their way down the aisle. One managed to kick me firmly on the
    shin in the process, to which I complained. Their response "I did say
    PLEASE".

    Overall on the trip I counted about five instances of people treading on >>>> my toes, none of whom were the slightest bit apologetic. Given I have
    gout, it's not a trivial assault.

    The train got progressively later, eventually being I think 28 minutes >>>> late. Which meant I missed my connection. The only train crew we saw was >>>> someone coming through asking for passengers to Inverness, and initially >>>> promising their connection would be held, but later saying "no it won't >>>> be". Quite a bit of delay-repay there, I'll wager.

    At Waverley I was still looking for cash, but all three ATMs in the
    waiting area next to the Brewdog pub were broken. Passengers on the
    still full-and-standing train had been waved thought the barriers on
    arrival, otherwise there'd have probably been a riot.

    Scotrail Express to Glasgow was less crowded (but I did recognise
    several pax from the KGX train). Another chat with friendly gripper
    about pay-per-scan-bounty.

    Luckily(?) it was two minutes late, hence I have a 32 minute delay repay >>>> to claim. It would have been irritating had it been one minute early.

    Met with the person I had travelled to see, and soon waiting for the
    Express back to Edinburgh. They didn't announce the platform until 4
    minutes before departure, which created a considerable scrum at the
    barriers.

    At Waverley, the London train was at an unbarriered platform some
    distance from te concourse, and with my reserved seat in Coach J, it
    felt like I'd already walked halfway home. Quite lightly loaded, so
    reservation was moot. No train crew seen all the way back to
    Peterborough.

    ... Where they'd fixed the lift to the far island platform, but failed >>>> to remove signage warning it was broken.

    And the departure board was stuffed with delays.

    Thameslink still borked, with one Horsham train cancelled "Problems at >>>> depot" and another "Delayed due to a points failure".

    20:52 to Leeds "11 late, due to points failure"
    20:53 to Birmingham "18 late, due to train crew delayed by earlier
    delays"
    21:08 to Kings Cross "Delayed due to points failure" and
    21:16 to Stansted "8 late due to a fault on the train earlier"

    I got on that one, which had been quite nicely refurbished (and the
    outside was very white, rather than XC colours).

    But the wifi wouldn't connect to my laptop and the disabled loo in my
    carriage was, err, disabled (locked out of use). No train crew gripping, >>>> and the barriers at my destination locked open because everyone had gone >>>> home.

    Nobody, all day, asked to see my railcard.

    Did you go first or second class?

    As I was on a budget, and didn't want to commit to specific trains, it
    was Standard(sic) Class walk-up.

    Doing a search just now for the same tickets for next Monday, First
    Class would be over u250 more expensive (u130 if I was prepared to risk
    fixed-time singles - incidentally historically hard to find had I chosen
    Plan A to go EUS-GLA direct, but next Monday roughly the same price as
    ECML. Shame the trains were cancelled last Monday).

    Which raises an interesting question: If doing a return trip and the
    outbound train is late, could one use the return leg on a different
    train without penalty? There seems to be an assumption in the system
    that you'd be going out and back on different days, so a delay on the
    first wouldn't impact one's ability to catch the correct train on the
    way back.

    Most long distance UK trains arenAt fit for purpose in second class, at
    least in my opinion. Far too cramped, both from the perspective of the >restrictive loading gauge and the desire to shoe horn in as many seats as >possible. And IAm sticking to second class as the nomenclature, as that is >what it is. ItAs one reason I prefer easyJet to Glasgow. ThatAs cramped,
    but you only sit in the seat for 45 minutes. (From Birmingham)

    It could be worse. In the old days it was Third Class :-)
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 11:53:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:42:53 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107n1b4$1297o$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:15:00 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    [I may write another report about the social issues of seat reservations >>>>> and how well people respected them]

    Early Monday morning and I'd already seen on Facebook that the council >>>>> had withdrawn the pay-by-phone app from their car park near the station. >>>>> So coins only (-u4 a day).

    This is the car park I'd used before with an app, which asked for how >>>>> long I was planning on staying, but didn't mention what the units were. >>>>> As it's long stay, charging per day, I said "7" (a week's holiday). Of >>>>> course, they don't say when days end, is it midnight or 4am?

    So next day, back then, I got a text on my phone to where I was on
    holiday abroad saying "Thanks for paying for 7 minutes parking, which we >>>>> rounded up to a day, but if you want to stay longer you need to pay some >>>>> more".

    Walking from there to the station, around the Tesco store, I thought it >>>>> might be prudent to get some cash (notes) from the one remaining ATM of >>>>> the four they used to have (one now boarded up at the petrol station and >>>>> three by the entrance). It was out of action.

    The station barriers scanned my printed PDF QR-coded ticket
    successfully. There was an inbound passenger unsuccessfully rummaging on >>>>> their phone for their ticket to be let out of the barriers.

    Train was due to depart from the island platform, so I trudged round >>>>> there via the only means of access - an underpass. Just as I got there, >>>>> they announced a platform change to #1. OK, so back via the underpass. >>>>>
    The XC to Stansted timed at the exact same clockface (when they were >>>>> both Central Trains, the crews would swap from one to the other) was >>>>> cancelled due to signal problems somewhere between Leicester and
    Peterborough. Several passengers getting quite agitated about missing >>>>> their flights, and the platform staff suggested they take a taxi (at >>>>> their own expense, I presume). Central Trains used to say pax should >>>>> plan to arrive at Stansted 2hrs before the last check-in time (ie 3hrs >>>>> before the flight) to paper over cracks like that.

    EMT train to Peterborough (later to Liverpool) was OK, and had a chat >>>>> with the gripper about his pay-per-scan bounty.

    Lift from the platform at Peterborough broken, and pax advised to use >>>>> the ex-Royal_Mail overbridge at the other end of the platforms. Queue >>>>> for the two unisex toilet cubicles on that platform quite long, so I >>>>> waited until on my departure platform.

    Thameslink southbound borked due to "Shortage of train crew".

    First Edinburgh train "delayed due to urgent bridge works", which later >>>>> transpired to be in the Durham area.

    Fatality on the Euston line causing havoc with three consecutive Glasgow >>>>> trains cancelled, and pax told to try already oversubscribed Kings Cross >>>>> to Edinburgh services.

    The buffet at Peterborough wouldn't sell alcohol before 10am (it was >>>>> clearly going to be impossible to get to an on-train buffet what with >>>>> the overcrowding). "Is this a new thing" I asked. "No", they lied, "it's >>>>> always been like that".

    My booked train (no reservation, but the ticket said "09:48, arr EDI >>>>> 13:22") was on time but full and standing, and only coach C was
    "unreserved", but that was partly a lie as well, because half of it
    *was* reserved. I propped myself up on the end of a table, with bags in >>>>> the aisle (because all the overhead racks were rammed full).

    Much hilarity ensued with people turning up with reservations, and
    people in the seats refusing to budge, but that'll be the topic of a >>>>> later posting.

    Quite a few tannoy announcements, but entirely inaudible. Next stop was >>>>> supposed to be York (and so it remained on the PIS) but it did an
    unscheduled stop at Doncaster.

    At which point several people opportunistically boarded and proceeded to >>>>> barge their way down the aisle. One managed to kick me firmly on the >>>>> shin in the process, to which I complained. Their response "I did say >>>>> PLEASE".

    Overall on the trip I counted about five instances of people treading on >>>>> my toes, none of whom were the slightest bit apologetic. Given I have >>>>> gout, it's not a trivial assault.

    The train got progressively later, eventually being I think 28 minutes >>>>> late. Which meant I missed my connection. The only train crew we saw was >>>>> someone coming through asking for passengers to Inverness, and initially >>>>> promising their connection would be held, but later saying "no it won't >>>>> be". Quite a bit of delay-repay there, I'll wager.

    At Waverley I was still looking for cash, but all three ATMs in the
    waiting area next to the Brewdog pub were broken. Passengers on the
    still full-and-standing train had been waved thought the barriers on >>>>> arrival, otherwise there'd have probably been a riot.

    Scotrail Express to Glasgow was less crowded (but I did recognise
    several pax from the KGX train). Another chat with friendly gripper
    about pay-per-scan-bounty.

    Luckily(?) it was two minutes late, hence I have a 32 minute delay repay >>>>> to claim. It would have been irritating had it been one minute early. >>>>>
    Met with the person I had travelled to see, and soon waiting for the >>>>> Express back to Edinburgh. They didn't announce the platform until 4 >>>>> minutes before departure, which created a considerable scrum at the
    barriers.

    At Waverley, the London train was at an unbarriered platform some
    distance from te concourse, and with my reserved seat in Coach J, it >>>>> felt like I'd already walked halfway home. Quite lightly loaded, so
    reservation was moot. No train crew seen all the way back to
    Peterborough.

    ... Where they'd fixed the lift to the far island platform, but failed >>>>> to remove signage warning it was broken.

    And the departure board was stuffed with delays.

    Thameslink still borked, with one Horsham train cancelled "Problems at >>>>> depot" and another "Delayed due to a points failure".

    20:52 to Leeds "11 late, due to points failure"
    20:53 to Birmingham "18 late, due to train crew delayed by earlier
    delays"
    21:08 to Kings Cross "Delayed due to points failure" and
    21:16 to Stansted "8 late due to a fault on the train earlier"

    I got on that one, which had been quite nicely refurbished (and the
    outside was very white, rather than XC colours).

    But the wifi wouldn't connect to my laptop and the disabled loo in my >>>>> carriage was, err, disabled (locked out of use). No train crew gripping, >>>>> and the barriers at my destination locked open because everyone had gone >>>>> home.

    Nobody, all day, asked to see my railcard.

    Did you go first or second class?

    As I was on a budget, and didn't want to commit to specific trains, it
    was Standard(sic) Class walk-up.

    Doing a search just now for the same tickets for next Monday, First
    Class would be over -u250 more expensive (-u130 if I was prepared to risk >>> fixed-time singles - incidentally historically hard to find had I chosen >>> Plan A to go EUS-GLA direct, but next Monday roughly the same price as
    ECML. Shame the trains were cancelled last Monday).

    Which raises an interesting question: If doing a return trip and the
    outbound train is late, could one use the return leg on a different
    train without penalty? There seems to be an assumption in the system
    that you'd be going out and back on different days, so a delay on the
    first wouldn't impact one's ability to catch the correct train on the
    way back.

    Most long distance UK trains aren-At fit for purpose in second class, at
    least in my opinion. Far too cramped, both from the perspective of the
    restrictive loading gauge and the desire to shoe horn in as many seats as
    possible. And I-Am sticking to second class as the nomenclature, as that is >> what it is. It-As one reason I prefer easyJet to Glasgow. That-As cramped, >> but you only sit in the seat for 45 minutes. (From Birmingham)

    It could be worse. In the old days it was Third Class :-)


    True. Having just travelled in that class on the NYMR, both in a
    compartment and an open carriage, I can confidently say that things are
    worse now in terms of comfort, apart from perhaps air conditioning.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 13:03:42 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:53:56 -0000 (UTC), Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:42:53 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107n1b4$1297o$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:15:00 on Fri, 15 Aug >>>> 2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    [I may write another report about the social issues of seat reservations >>>>>> and how well people respected them]

    Early Monday morning and I'd already seen on Facebook that the council >>>>>> had withdrawn the pay-by-phone app from their car park near the station. >>>>>> So coins only (-u4 a day).

    This is the car park I'd used before with an app, which asked for how >>>>>> long I was planning on staying, but didn't mention what the units were. >>>>>> As it's long stay, charging per day, I said "7" (a week's holiday). Of >>>>>> course, they don't say when days end, is it midnight or 4am?

    So next day, back then, I got a text on my phone to where I was on >>>>>> holiday abroad saying "Thanks for paying for 7 minutes parking, which we >>>>>> rounded up to a day, but if you want to stay longer you need to pay some >>>>>> more".

    Walking from there to the station, around the Tesco store, I thought it >>>>>> might be prudent to get some cash (notes) from the one remaining ATM of >>>>>> the four they used to have (one now boarded up at the petrol station and >>>>>> three by the entrance). It was out of action.

    The station barriers scanned my printed PDF QR-coded ticket
    successfully. There was an inbound passenger unsuccessfully rummaging on >>>>>> their phone for their ticket to be let out of the barriers.

    Train was due to depart from the island platform, so I trudged round >>>>>> there via the only means of access - an underpass. Just as I got there, >>>>>> they announced a platform change to #1. OK, so back via the underpass. >>>>>>
    The XC to Stansted timed at the exact same clockface (when they were >>>>>> both Central Trains, the crews would swap from one to the other) was >>>>>> cancelled due to signal problems somewhere between Leicester and
    Peterborough. Several passengers getting quite agitated about missing >>>>>> their flights, and the platform staff suggested they take a taxi (at >>>>>> their own expense, I presume). Central Trains used to say pax should >>>>>> plan to arrive at Stansted 2hrs before the last check-in time (ie 3hrs >>>>>> before the flight) to paper over cracks like that.

    EMT train to Peterborough (later to Liverpool) was OK, and had a chat >>>>>> with the gripper about his pay-per-scan bounty.

    Lift from the platform at Peterborough broken, and pax advised to use >>>>>> the ex-Royal_Mail overbridge at the other end of the platforms. Queue >>>>>> for the two unisex toilet cubicles on that platform quite long, so I >>>>>> waited until on my departure platform.

    Thameslink southbound borked due to "Shortage of train crew".

    First Edinburgh train "delayed due to urgent bridge works", which later >>>>>> transpired to be in the Durham area.

    Fatality on the Euston line causing havoc with three consecutive Glasgow >>>>>> trains cancelled, and pax told to try already oversubscribed Kings Cross >>>>>> to Edinburgh services.

    The buffet at Peterborough wouldn't sell alcohol before 10am (it was >>>>>> clearly going to be impossible to get to an on-train buffet what with >>>>>> the overcrowding). "Is this a new thing" I asked. "No", they lied, "it's >>>>>> always been like that".

    My booked train (no reservation, but the ticket said "09:48, arr EDI >>>>>> 13:22") was on time but full and standing, and only coach C was
    "unreserved", but that was partly a lie as well, because half of it >>>>>> *was* reserved. I propped myself up on the end of a table, with bags in >>>>>> the aisle (because all the overhead racks were rammed full).

    Much hilarity ensued with people turning up with reservations, and >>>>>> people in the seats refusing to budge, but that'll be the topic of a >>>>>> later posting.

    Quite a few tannoy announcements, but entirely inaudible. Next stop was >>>>>> supposed to be York (and so it remained on the PIS) but it did an
    unscheduled stop at Doncaster.

    At which point several people opportunistically boarded and proceeded to >>>>>> barge their way down the aisle. One managed to kick me firmly on the >>>>>> shin in the process, to which I complained. Their response "I did say >>>>>> PLEASE".

    Overall on the trip I counted about five instances of people treading on >>>>>> my toes, none of whom were the slightest bit apologetic. Given I have >>>>>> gout, it's not a trivial assault.

    The train got progressively later, eventually being I think 28 minutes >>>>>> late. Which meant I missed my connection. The only train crew we saw was >>>>>> someone coming through asking for passengers to Inverness, and initially >>>>>> promising their connection would be held, but later saying "no it won't >>>>>> be". Quite a bit of delay-repay there, I'll wager.

    At Waverley I was still looking for cash, but all three ATMs in the >>>>>> waiting area next to the Brewdog pub were broken. Passengers on the >>>>>> still full-and-standing train had been waved thought the barriers on >>>>>> arrival, otherwise there'd have probably been a riot.

    Scotrail Express to Glasgow was less crowded (but I did recognise
    several pax from the KGX train). Another chat with friendly gripper >>>>>> about pay-per-scan-bounty.

    Luckily(?) it was two minutes late, hence I have a 32 minute delay repay >>>>>> to claim. It would have been irritating had it been one minute early. >>>>>>
    Met with the person I had travelled to see, and soon waiting for the >>>>>> Express back to Edinburgh. They didn't announce the platform until 4 >>>>>> minutes before departure, which created a considerable scrum at the >>>>>> barriers.

    At Waverley, the London train was at an unbarriered platform some
    distance from te concourse, and with my reserved seat in Coach J, it >>>>>> felt like I'd already walked halfway home. Quite lightly loaded, so >>>>>> reservation was moot. No train crew seen all the way back to
    Peterborough.

    ... Where they'd fixed the lift to the far island platform, but failed >>>>>> to remove signage warning it was broken.

    And the departure board was stuffed with delays.

    Thameslink still borked, with one Horsham train cancelled "Problems at >>>>>> depot" and another "Delayed due to a points failure".

    20:52 to Leeds "11 late, due to points failure"
    20:53 to Birmingham "18 late, due to train crew delayed by earlier >>>>>> delays"
    21:08 to Kings Cross "Delayed due to points failure" and
    21:16 to Stansted "8 late due to a fault on the train earlier"

    I got on that one, which had been quite nicely refurbished (and the >>>>>> outside was very white, rather than XC colours).

    But the wifi wouldn't connect to my laptop and the disabled loo in my >>>>>> carriage was, err, disabled (locked out of use). No train crew gripping, >>>>>> and the barriers at my destination locked open because everyone had gone >>>>>> home.

    Nobody, all day, asked to see my railcard.

    Did you go first or second class?

    As I was on a budget, and didn't want to commit to specific trains, it >>>> was Standard(sic) Class walk-up.

    Doing a search just now for the same tickets for next Monday, First
    Class would be over -u250 more expensive (-u130 if I was prepared to risk >>>> fixed-time singles - incidentally historically hard to find had I chosen >>>> Plan A to go EUS-GLA direct, but next Monday roughly the same price as >>>> ECML. Shame the trains were cancelled last Monday).

    Which raises an interesting question: If doing a return trip and the
    outbound train is late, could one use the return leg on a different
    train without penalty? There seems to be an assumption in the system
    that you'd be going out and back on different days, so a delay on the >>>> first wouldn't impact one's ability to catch the correct train on the >>>> way back.

    Most long distance UK trains aren?t fit for purpose in second class, at
    least in my opinion. Far too cramped, both from the perspective of the
    restrictive loading gauge and the desire to shoe horn in as many seats as >>> possible. And I?m sticking to second class as the nomenclature, as that is >>> what it is. It?s one reason I prefer easyJet to Glasgow. That?s cramped, >>> but you only sit in the seat for 45 minutes. (From Birmingham)

    It could be worse. In the old days it was Third Class :-)


    True. Having just travelled in that class on the NYMR, both in a
    compartment and an open carriage, I can confidently say that things are
    worse now in terms of comfort, apart from perhaps air conditioning.

    I've recently had several rides in first generation BR DMUs, which even in standard class have deep, upholstered,
    comfortable seats, far better than modern British first class seats. And, no, it's nothing to do with fire resistance.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 12:11:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:53:56 -0000 (UTC), Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:42:53 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107n1b4$1297o$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:15:00 on Fri, 15 Aug >>>>> 2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    [I may write another report about the social issues of seat reservations
    and how well people respected them]

    Early Monday morning and I'd already seen on Facebook that the council >>>>>>> had withdrawn the pay-by-phone app from their car park near the station.
    So coins only (-u4 a day).

    This is the car park I'd used before with an app, which asked for how >>>>>>> long I was planning on staying, but didn't mention what the units were. >>>>>>> As it's long stay, charging per day, I said "7" (a week's holiday). Of >>>>>>> course, they don't say when days end, is it midnight or 4am?

    So next day, back then, I got a text on my phone to where I was on >>>>>>> holiday abroad saying "Thanks for paying for 7 minutes parking, which we
    rounded up to a day, but if you want to stay longer you need to pay some
    more".

    Walking from there to the station, around the Tesco store, I thought it >>>>>>> might be prudent to get some cash (notes) from the one remaining ATM of >>>>>>> the four they used to have (one now boarded up at the petrol station and
    three by the entrance). It was out of action.

    The station barriers scanned my printed PDF QR-coded ticket
    successfully. There was an inbound passenger unsuccessfully rummaging on
    their phone for their ticket to be let out of the barriers.

    Train was due to depart from the island platform, so I trudged round >>>>>>> there via the only means of access - an underpass. Just as I got there, >>>>>>> they announced a platform change to #1. OK, so back via the underpass. >>>>>>>
    The XC to Stansted timed at the exact same clockface (when they were >>>>>>> both Central Trains, the crews would swap from one to the other) was >>>>>>> cancelled due to signal problems somewhere between Leicester and >>>>>>> Peterborough. Several passengers getting quite agitated about missing >>>>>>> their flights, and the platform staff suggested they take a taxi (at >>>>>>> their own expense, I presume). Central Trains used to say pax should >>>>>>> plan to arrive at Stansted 2hrs before the last check-in time (ie 3hrs >>>>>>> before the flight) to paper over cracks like that.

    EMT train to Peterborough (later to Liverpool) was OK, and had a chat >>>>>>> with the gripper about his pay-per-scan bounty.

    Lift from the platform at Peterborough broken, and pax advised to use >>>>>>> the ex-Royal_Mail overbridge at the other end of the platforms. Queue >>>>>>> for the two unisex toilet cubicles on that platform quite long, so I >>>>>>> waited until on my departure platform.

    Thameslink southbound borked due to "Shortage of train crew".

    First Edinburgh train "delayed due to urgent bridge works", which later >>>>>>> transpired to be in the Durham area.

    Fatality on the Euston line causing havoc with three consecutive Glasgow
    trains cancelled, and pax told to try already oversubscribed Kings Cross
    to Edinburgh services.

    The buffet at Peterborough wouldn't sell alcohol before 10am (it was >>>>>>> clearly going to be impossible to get to an on-train buffet what with >>>>>>> the overcrowding). "Is this a new thing" I asked. "No", they lied, "it's
    always been like that".

    My booked train (no reservation, but the ticket said "09:48, arr EDI >>>>>>> 13:22") was on time but full and standing, and only coach C was
    "unreserved", but that was partly a lie as well, because half of it >>>>>>> *was* reserved. I propped myself up on the end of a table, with bags in >>>>>>> the aisle (because all the overhead racks were rammed full).

    Much hilarity ensued with people turning up with reservations, and >>>>>>> people in the seats refusing to budge, but that'll be the topic of a >>>>>>> later posting.

    Quite a few tannoy announcements, but entirely inaudible. Next stop was >>>>>>> supposed to be York (and so it remained on the PIS) but it did an >>>>>>> unscheduled stop at Doncaster.

    At which point several people opportunistically boarded and proceeded to
    barge their way down the aisle. One managed to kick me firmly on the >>>>>>> shin in the process, to which I complained. Their response "I did say >>>>>>> PLEASE".

    Overall on the trip I counted about five instances of people treading on
    my toes, none of whom were the slightest bit apologetic. Given I have >>>>>>> gout, it's not a trivial assault.

    The train got progressively later, eventually being I think 28 minutes >>>>>>> late. Which meant I missed my connection. The only train crew we saw was
    someone coming through asking for passengers to Inverness, and initially
    promising their connection would be held, but later saying "no it won't >>>>>>> be". Quite a bit of delay-repay there, I'll wager.

    At Waverley I was still looking for cash, but all three ATMs in the >>>>>>> waiting area next to the Brewdog pub were broken. Passengers on the >>>>>>> still full-and-standing train had been waved thought the barriers on >>>>>>> arrival, otherwise there'd have probably been a riot.

    Scotrail Express to Glasgow was less crowded (but I did recognise >>>>>>> several pax from the KGX train). Another chat with friendly gripper >>>>>>> about pay-per-scan-bounty.

    Luckily(?) it was two minutes late, hence I have a 32 minute delay repay
    to claim. It would have been irritating had it been one minute early. >>>>>>>
    Met with the person I had travelled to see, and soon waiting for the >>>>>>> Express back to Edinburgh. They didn't announce the platform until 4 >>>>>>> minutes before departure, which created a considerable scrum at the >>>>>>> barriers.

    At Waverley, the London train was at an unbarriered platform some >>>>>>> distance from te concourse, and with my reserved seat in Coach J, it >>>>>>> felt like I'd already walked halfway home. Quite lightly loaded, so >>>>>>> reservation was moot. No train crew seen all the way back to
    Peterborough.

    ... Where they'd fixed the lift to the far island platform, but failed >>>>>>> to remove signage warning it was broken.

    And the departure board was stuffed with delays.

    Thameslink still borked, with one Horsham train cancelled "Problems at >>>>>>> depot" and another "Delayed due to a points failure".

    20:52 to Leeds "11 late, due to points failure"
    20:53 to Birmingham "18 late, due to train crew delayed by earlier >>>>>>> delays"
    21:08 to Kings Cross "Delayed due to points failure" and
    21:16 to Stansted "8 late due to a fault on the train earlier"

    I got on that one, which had been quite nicely refurbished (and the >>>>>>> outside was very white, rather than XC colours).

    But the wifi wouldn't connect to my laptop and the disabled loo in my >>>>>>> carriage was, err, disabled (locked out of use). No train crew gripping,
    and the barriers at my destination locked open because everyone had gone
    home.

    Nobody, all day, asked to see my railcard.

    Did you go first or second class?

    As I was on a budget, and didn't want to commit to specific trains, it >>>>> was Standard(sic) Class walk-up.

    Doing a search just now for the same tickets for next Monday, First >>>>> Class would be over -u250 more expensive (-u130 if I was prepared to risk
    fixed-time singles - incidentally historically hard to find had I chosen >>>>> Plan A to go EUS-GLA direct, but next Monday roughly the same price as >>>>> ECML. Shame the trains were cancelled last Monday).

    Which raises an interesting question: If doing a return trip and the >>>>> outbound train is late, could one use the return leg on a different >>>>> train without penalty? There seems to be an assumption in the system >>>>> that you'd be going out and back on different days, so a delay on the >>>>> first wouldn't impact one's ability to catch the correct train on the >>>>> way back.

    Most long distance UK trains aren?t fit for purpose in second class, at >>>> least in my opinion. Far too cramped, both from the perspective of the >>>> restrictive loading gauge and the desire to shoe horn in as many seats as >>>> possible. And I?m sticking to second class as the nomenclature, as that is >>>> what it is. It?s one reason I prefer easyJet to Glasgow. That?s cramped, >>>> but you only sit in the seat for 45 minutes. (From Birmingham)

    It could be worse. In the old days it was Third Class :-)


    True. Having just travelled in that class on the NYMR, both in a
    compartment and an open carriage, I can confidently say that things are
    worse now in terms of comfort, apart from perhaps air conditioning.

    I've recently had several rides in first generation BR DMUs, which even
    in standard class have deep, upholstered,
    comfortable seats, far better than modern British first class seats. And,
    no, it's nothing to do with fire resistance.


    Mind you, Swiss seats can be pretty tough on the posterior, though second
    class has improved from wooden slatsrCa

    Not sure why the modern railway has such a problem with seats. An easyJet
    seat is far more comfortable, and they have to meet fire and crash
    resistance targets, not to mention trying to make them as light as
    possible.

    But seat design apart, airline style seating on a train is a scourge. The
    lack of that was one thing that made the NYMR open second such a pleasure.
    And the seats line up with the windows. We canrCOt even manage that in first these days.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 13:17:07 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <107n5qu$13atg$1@andyburns.eternal-september.org>, at
    12:31:41 on Fri, 15 Aug 2025, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> remarked: >Roland Perry wrote:

    Luckily I did have sufficient coins to pay for the car park, but so
    many places now are "card only" and/or we are surrounded by people
    who scoff at "goat-herders" who want to pay with cash, I don't
    usually have any banknotes available.

    It must be a conscious choice to not carry notes,

    I don't carry spare ones.

    so you shouldn't complain when you need some ...

    I expect to be able to pick some up at an ATM, if I need them. Didn't
    seem to be possible on Monday.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 13:22:09 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 12:11:56 -0000 (UTC), Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:53:56 -0000 (UTC), Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:42:53 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107n1b4$1297o$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:15:00 on Fri, 15 Aug >>>>>> 2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    [I may write another report about the social issues of seat reservations
    and how well people respected them]

    Early Monday morning and I'd already seen on Facebook that the council >>>>>>>> had withdrawn the pay-by-phone app from their car park near the station.
    So coins only (-u4 a day).

    This is the car park I'd used before with an app, which asked for how >>>>>>>> long I was planning on staying, but didn't mention what the units were.
    As it's long stay, charging per day, I said "7" (a week's holiday). Of >>>>>>>> course, they don't say when days end, is it midnight or 4am?

    So next day, back then, I got a text on my phone to where I was on >>>>>>>> holiday abroad saying "Thanks for paying for 7 minutes parking, which we
    rounded up to a day, but if you want to stay longer you need to pay some
    more".

    Walking from there to the station, around the Tesco store, I thought it
    might be prudent to get some cash (notes) from the one remaining ATM of
    the four they used to have (one now boarded up at the petrol station and
    three by the entrance). It was out of action.

    The station barriers scanned my printed PDF QR-coded ticket
    successfully. There was an inbound passenger unsuccessfully rummaging on
    their phone for their ticket to be let out of the barriers.

    Train was due to depart from the island platform, so I trudged round >>>>>>>> there via the only means of access - an underpass. Just as I got there,
    they announced a platform change to #1. OK, so back via the underpass. >>>>>>>>
    The XC to Stansted timed at the exact same clockface (when they were >>>>>>>> both Central Trains, the crews would swap from one to the other) was >>>>>>>> cancelled due to signal problems somewhere between Leicester and >>>>>>>> Peterborough. Several passengers getting quite agitated about missing >>>>>>>> their flights, and the platform staff suggested they take a taxi (at >>>>>>>> their own expense, I presume). Central Trains used to say pax should >>>>>>>> plan to arrive at Stansted 2hrs before the last check-in time (ie 3hrs >>>>>>>> before the flight) to paper over cracks like that.

    EMT train to Peterborough (later to Liverpool) was OK, and had a chat >>>>>>>> with the gripper about his pay-per-scan bounty.

    Lift from the platform at Peterborough broken, and pax advised to use >>>>>>>> the ex-Royal_Mail overbridge at the other end of the platforms. Queue >>>>>>>> for the two unisex toilet cubicles on that platform quite long, so I >>>>>>>> waited until on my departure platform.

    Thameslink southbound borked due to "Shortage of train crew".

    First Edinburgh train "delayed due to urgent bridge works", which later
    transpired to be in the Durham area.

    Fatality on the Euston line causing havoc with three consecutive Glasgow
    trains cancelled, and pax told to try already oversubscribed Kings Cross
    to Edinburgh services.

    The buffet at Peterborough wouldn't sell alcohol before 10am (it was >>>>>>>> clearly going to be impossible to get to an on-train buffet what with >>>>>>>> the overcrowding). "Is this a new thing" I asked. "No", they lied, "it's
    always been like that".

    My booked train (no reservation, but the ticket said "09:48, arr EDI >>>>>>>> 13:22") was on time but full and standing, and only coach C was >>>>>>>> "unreserved", but that was partly a lie as well, because half of it >>>>>>>> *was* reserved. I propped myself up on the end of a table, with bags in
    the aisle (because all the overhead racks were rammed full).

    Much hilarity ensued with people turning up with reservations, and >>>>>>>> people in the seats refusing to budge, but that'll be the topic of a >>>>>>>> later posting.

    Quite a few tannoy announcements, but entirely inaudible. Next stop was
    supposed to be York (and so it remained on the PIS) but it did an >>>>>>>> unscheduled stop at Doncaster.

    At which point several people opportunistically boarded and proceeded to
    barge their way down the aisle. One managed to kick me firmly on the >>>>>>>> shin in the process, to which I complained. Their response "I did say >>>>>>>> PLEASE".

    Overall on the trip I counted about five instances of people treading on
    my toes, none of whom were the slightest bit apologetic. Given I have >>>>>>>> gout, it's not a trivial assault.

    The train got progressively later, eventually being I think 28 minutes >>>>>>>> late. Which meant I missed my connection. The only train crew we saw was
    someone coming through asking for passengers to Inverness, and initially
    promising their connection would be held, but later saying "no it won't
    be". Quite a bit of delay-repay there, I'll wager.

    At Waverley I was still looking for cash, but all three ATMs in the >>>>>>>> waiting area next to the Brewdog pub were broken. Passengers on the >>>>>>>> still full-and-standing train had been waved thought the barriers on >>>>>>>> arrival, otherwise there'd have probably been a riot.

    Scotrail Express to Glasgow was less crowded (but I did recognise >>>>>>>> several pax from the KGX train). Another chat with friendly gripper >>>>>>>> about pay-per-scan-bounty.

    Luckily(?) it was two minutes late, hence I have a 32 minute delay repay
    to claim. It would have been irritating had it been one minute early. >>>>>>>>
    Met with the person I had travelled to see, and soon waiting for the >>>>>>>> Express back to Edinburgh. They didn't announce the platform until 4 >>>>>>>> minutes before departure, which created a considerable scrum at the >>>>>>>> barriers.

    At Waverley, the London train was at an unbarriered platform some >>>>>>>> distance from te concourse, and with my reserved seat in Coach J, it >>>>>>>> felt like I'd already walked halfway home. Quite lightly loaded, so >>>>>>>> reservation was moot. No train crew seen all the way back to
    Peterborough.

    ... Where they'd fixed the lift to the far island platform, but failed >>>>>>>> to remove signage warning it was broken.

    And the departure board was stuffed with delays.

    Thameslink still borked, with one Horsham train cancelled "Problems at >>>>>>>> depot" and another "Delayed due to a points failure".

    20:52 to Leeds "11 late, due to points failure"
    20:53 to Birmingham "18 late, due to train crew delayed by earlier >>>>>>>> delays"
    21:08 to Kings Cross "Delayed due to points failure" and
    21:16 to Stansted "8 late due to a fault on the train earlier" >>>>>>>>
    I got on that one, which had been quite nicely refurbished (and the >>>>>>>> outside was very white, rather than XC colours).

    But the wifi wouldn't connect to my laptop and the disabled loo in my >>>>>>>> carriage was, err, disabled (locked out of use). No train crew gripping,
    and the barriers at my destination locked open because everyone had gone
    home.

    Nobody, all day, asked to see my railcard.

    Did you go first or second class?

    As I was on a budget, and didn't want to commit to specific trains, it >>>>>> was Standard(sic) Class walk-up.

    Doing a search just now for the same tickets for next Monday, First >>>>>> Class would be over -u250 more expensive (-u130 if I was prepared to risk
    fixed-time singles - incidentally historically hard to find had I chosen
    Plan A to go EUS-GLA direct, but next Monday roughly the same price as >>>>>> ECML. Shame the trains were cancelled last Monday).

    Which raises an interesting question: If doing a return trip and the >>>>>> outbound train is late, could one use the return leg on a different >>>>>> train without penalty? There seems to be an assumption in the system >>>>>> that you'd be going out and back on different days, so a delay on the >>>>>> first wouldn't impact one's ability to catch the correct train on the >>>>>> way back.

    Most long distance UK trains aren?t fit for purpose in second class, at >>>>> least in my opinion. Far too cramped, both from the perspective of the >>>>> restrictive loading gauge and the desire to shoe horn in as many seats as >>>>> possible. And I?m sticking to second class as the nomenclature, as that is
    what it is. It?s one reason I prefer easyJet to Glasgow. That?s cramped, >>>>> but you only sit in the seat for 45 minutes. (From Birmingham)

    It could be worse. In the old days it was Third Class :-)


    True. Having just travelled in that class on the NYMR, both in a
    compartment and an open carriage, I can confidently say that things are
    worse now in terms of comfort, apart from perhaps air conditioning.

    I've recently had several rides in first generation BR DMUs, which even
    in standard class have deep, upholstered,
    comfortable seats, far better than modern British first class seats. And,
    no, it's nothing to do with fire resistance.


    Mind you, Swiss seats can be pretty tough on the posterior, though second >class has improved from wooden slatsrCa

    Not sure why the modern railway has such a problem with seats. An easyJet >seat is far more comfortable, and they have to meet fire and crash
    resistance targets, not to mention trying to make them as light as
    possible.

    But seat design apart, airline style seating on a train is a scourge. The >lack of that was one thing that made the NYMR open second such a pleasure. >And the seats line up with the windows. We canrCOt even manage that in first >these days.

    It's much worse with high-backed, airline seats, as only a small part of the carriage wall is visible. Inevitably, some
    seats wall views are of pillars (which are, I think, wider in modern trains, which have stricter strength requirements,
    and probably more wiring and air ducts passing through them).
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 13:24:26 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <107n74k$13m64$1@dont-email.me>, at 11:53:56 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Most long distance UK trains arenrCOt fit for purpose in second class, at >>> least in my opinion. Far too cramped, both from the perspective of the
    restrictive loading gauge and the desire to shoe horn in as many seats as >>> possible. And IrCOm sticking to second class as the nomenclature, as that is
    what it is. ItrCOs one reason I prefer easyJet to Glasgow. ThatrCOs cramped,
    but you only sit in the seat for 45 minutes. (From Birmingham)

    It could be worse. In the old days it was Third Class :-)

    True. Having just travelled in that class on the NYMR, both in a
    compartment and an open carriage, I can confidently say that things are
    worse now in terms of comfort, apart from perhaps air conditioning.

    On all the trains the aircon was freezing, almost uncomfortable because
    one was dressed for the thirty-degrees outdoors.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 13:19:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <107n6ft$13ht9$1@dont-email.me>, at 11:42:53 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107n1b4$1297o$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:15:00 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    [I may write another report about the social issues of seat reservations >>>> and how well people respected them]

    Early Monday morning and I'd already seen on Facebook that the council >>>> had withdrawn the pay-by-phone app from their car park near the station. >>>> So coins only (-u4 a day).

    This is the car park I'd used before with an app, which asked for how
    long I was planning on staying, but didn't mention what the units were. >>>> As it's long stay, charging per day, I said "7" (a week's holiday). Of >>>> course, they don't say when days end, is it midnight or 4am?

    So next day, back then, I got a text on my phone to where I was on
    holiday abroad saying "Thanks for paying for 7 minutes parking, which we >>>> rounded up to a day, but if you want to stay longer you need to pay some >>>> more".

    Walking from there to the station, around the Tesco store, I thought it >>>> might be prudent to get some cash (notes) from the one remaining ATM of >>>> the four they used to have (one now boarded up at the petrol station and >>>> three by the entrance). It was out of action.

    The station barriers scanned my printed PDF QR-coded ticket
    successfully. There was an inbound passenger unsuccessfully rummaging on >>>> their phone for their ticket to be let out of the barriers.

    Train was due to depart from the island platform, so I trudged round
    there via the only means of access - an underpass. Just as I got there, >>>> they announced a platform change to #1. OK, so back via the underpass. >>>>
    The XC to Stansted timed at the exact same clockface (when they were
    both Central Trains, the crews would swap from one to the other) was
    cancelled due to signal problems somewhere between Leicester and
    Peterborough. Several passengers getting quite agitated about missing
    their flights, and the platform staff suggested they take a taxi (at
    their own expense, I presume). Central Trains used to say pax should
    plan to arrive at Stansted 2hrs before the last check-in time (ie 3hrs >>>> before the flight) to paper over cracks like that.

    EMT train to Peterborough (later to Liverpool) was OK, and had a chat
    with the gripper about his pay-per-scan bounty.

    Lift from the platform at Peterborough broken, and pax advised to use
    the ex-Royal_Mail overbridge at the other end of the platforms. Queue
    for the two unisex toilet cubicles on that platform quite long, so I
    waited until on my departure platform.

    Thameslink southbound borked due to "Shortage of train crew".

    First Edinburgh train "delayed due to urgent bridge works", which later >>>> transpired to be in the Durham area.

    Fatality on the Euston line causing havoc with three consecutive Glasgow >>>> trains cancelled, and pax told to try already oversubscribed Kings Cross >>>> to Edinburgh services.

    The buffet at Peterborough wouldn't sell alcohol before 10am (it was
    clearly going to be impossible to get to an on-train buffet what with
    the overcrowding). "Is this a new thing" I asked. "No", they lied, "it's >>>> always been like that".

    My booked train (no reservation, but the ticket said "09:48, arr EDI
    13:22") was on time but full and standing, and only coach C was
    "unreserved", but that was partly a lie as well, because half of it
    *was* reserved. I propped myself up on the end of a table, with bags in >>>> the aisle (because all the overhead racks were rammed full).

    Much hilarity ensued with people turning up with reservations, and
    people in the seats refusing to budge, but that'll be the topic of a
    later posting.

    Quite a few tannoy announcements, but entirely inaudible. Next stop was >>>> supposed to be York (and so it remained on the PIS) but it did an
    unscheduled stop at Doncaster.

    At which point several people opportunistically boarded and proceeded to >>>> barge their way down the aisle. One managed to kick me firmly on the
    shin in the process, to which I complained. Their response "I did say
    PLEASE".

    Overall on the trip I counted about five instances of people treading on >>>> my toes, none of whom were the slightest bit apologetic. Given I have
    gout, it's not a trivial assault.

    The train got progressively later, eventually being I think 28 minutes >>>> late. Which meant I missed my connection. The only train crew we saw was >>>> someone coming through asking for passengers to Inverness, and initially >>>> promising their connection would be held, but later saying "no it won't >>>> be". Quite a bit of delay-repay there, I'll wager.

    At Waverley I was still looking for cash, but all three ATMs in the
    waiting area next to the Brewdog pub were broken. Passengers on the
    still full-and-standing train had been waved thought the barriers on
    arrival, otherwise there'd have probably been a riot.

    Scotrail Express to Glasgow was less crowded (but I did recognise
    several pax from the KGX train). Another chat with friendly gripper
    about pay-per-scan-bounty.

    Luckily(?) it was two minutes late, hence I have a 32 minute delay repay >>>> to claim. It would have been irritating had it been one minute early.

    Met with the person I had travelled to see, and soon waiting for the
    Express back to Edinburgh. They didn't announce the platform until 4
    minutes before departure, which created a considerable scrum at the
    barriers.

    At Waverley, the London train was at an unbarriered platform some
    distance from te concourse, and with my reserved seat in Coach J, it
    felt like I'd already walked halfway home. Quite lightly loaded, so
    reservation was moot. No train crew seen all the way back to
    Peterborough.

    ... Where they'd fixed the lift to the far island platform, but failed >>>> to remove signage warning it was broken.

    And the departure board was stuffed with delays.

    Thameslink still borked, with one Horsham train cancelled "Problems at >>>> depot" and another "Delayed due to a points failure".

    20:52 to Leeds "11 late, due to points failure"
    20:53 to Birmingham "18 late, due to train crew delayed by earlier
    delays"
    21:08 to Kings Cross "Delayed due to points failure" and
    21:16 to Stansted "8 late due to a fault on the train earlier"

    I got on that one, which had been quite nicely refurbished (and the
    outside was very white, rather than XC colours).

    But the wifi wouldn't connect to my laptop and the disabled loo in my
    carriage was, err, disabled (locked out of use). No train crew gripping, >>>> and the barriers at my destination locked open because everyone had gone >>>> home.

    Nobody, all day, asked to see my railcard.

    Did you go first or second class?

    As I was on a budget, and didn't want to commit to specific trains, it
    was Standard(sic) Class walk-up.

    Doing a search just now for the same tickets for next Monday, First
    Class would be over -u250 more expensive (-u130 if I was prepared to risk
    fixed-time singles - incidentally historically hard to find had I chosen
    Plan A to go EUS-GLA direct, but next Monday roughly the same price as
    ECML. Shame the trains were cancelled last Monday).

    Which raises an interesting question: If doing a return trip and the
    outbound train is late, could one use the return leg on a different
    train without penalty? There seems to be an assumption in the system
    that you'd be going out and back on different days, so a delay on the
    first wouldn't impact one's ability to catch the correct train on the
    way back.

    Most long distance UK trains arenrCOt fit for purpose in second class, at >least in my opinion. Far too cramped, both from the perspective of the >restrictive loading gauge and the desire to shoe horn in as many seats as >possible.

    The return leg on an identical train was perfectly OK. It was the
    loading which caused the issues northbound.

    And IrCOm sticking to second class as the nomenclature, as that is
    what it is. ItrCOs one reason I prefer easyJet to Glasgow. ThatrCOs cramped, >but you only sit in the seat for 45 minutes. (From Birmingham)

    As I said before, I couldn't realistically fly because of the luggage I
    had on the return trip. And it would have been from Stansted as the
    train service from Cambs to Birmingham Airport is terrible (and
    virtually no First Class accommodation).
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 12:32:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107n5qu$13atg$1@andyburns.eternal-september.org>, at
    12:31:41 on Fri, 15 Aug 2025, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> remarked:
    Roland Perry wrote:

    Luckily I did have sufficient coins to pay for the car park, but so
    many places now are "card only" and/or we are surrounded by people
    who scoff at "goat-herders" who want to pay with cash, I don't
    usually have any banknotes available.

    It must be a conscious choice to not carry notes,

    I don't carry spare ones.

    so you shouldn't complain when you need some ...

    I expect to be able to pick some up at an ATM, if I need them. Didn't
    seem to be possible on Monday.

    For someone that lays great store about carting around a huge array of bits
    and bobs in a rCLroad warriorrCY kit, not having spare bank notes is a bit remiss. Mine saved the day at M&S. I was at the till during what now
    transpires as the first few minutes of their ransomware attack.
    Credit/debit cards would not work, but I could pay in cash. ItrCOs also not uncommon for ATMs to go out of service when the banksrCO computer systems are having a bad hair day, which seems to be at least an annual event per major bank group.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 12:44:38 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107n6ft$13ht9$1@dont-email.me>, at 11:42:53 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107n1b4$1297o$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:15:00 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    [I may write another report about the social issues of seat reservations >>>>> and how well people respected them]

    Early Monday morning and I'd already seen on Facebook that the council >>>>> had withdrawn the pay-by-phone app from their car park near the station. >>>>> So coins only (-u4 a day).

    This is the car park I'd used before with an app, which asked for how >>>>> long I was planning on staying, but didn't mention what the units were. >>>>> As it's long stay, charging per day, I said "7" (a week's holiday). Of >>>>> course, they don't say when days end, is it midnight or 4am?

    So next day, back then, I got a text on my phone to where I was on
    holiday abroad saying "Thanks for paying for 7 minutes parking, which we >>>>> rounded up to a day, but if you want to stay longer you need to pay some >>>>> more".

    Walking from there to the station, around the Tesco store, I thought it >>>>> might be prudent to get some cash (notes) from the one remaining ATM of >>>>> the four they used to have (one now boarded up at the petrol station and >>>>> three by the entrance). It was out of action.

    The station barriers scanned my printed PDF QR-coded ticket
    successfully. There was an inbound passenger unsuccessfully rummaging on >>>>> their phone for their ticket to be let out of the barriers.

    Train was due to depart from the island platform, so I trudged round >>>>> there via the only means of access - an underpass. Just as I got there, >>>>> they announced a platform change to #1. OK, so back via the underpass. >>>>>
    The XC to Stansted timed at the exact same clockface (when they were >>>>> both Central Trains, the crews would swap from one to the other) was >>>>> cancelled due to signal problems somewhere between Leicester and
    Peterborough. Several passengers getting quite agitated about missing >>>>> their flights, and the platform staff suggested they take a taxi (at >>>>> their own expense, I presume). Central Trains used to say pax should >>>>> plan to arrive at Stansted 2hrs before the last check-in time (ie 3hrs >>>>> before the flight) to paper over cracks like that.

    EMT train to Peterborough (later to Liverpool) was OK, and had a chat >>>>> with the gripper about his pay-per-scan bounty.

    Lift from the platform at Peterborough broken, and pax advised to use >>>>> the ex-Royal_Mail overbridge at the other end of the platforms. Queue >>>>> for the two unisex toilet cubicles on that platform quite long, so I >>>>> waited until on my departure platform.

    Thameslink southbound borked due to "Shortage of train crew".

    First Edinburgh train "delayed due to urgent bridge works", which later >>>>> transpired to be in the Durham area.

    Fatality on the Euston line causing havoc with three consecutive Glasgow >>>>> trains cancelled, and pax told to try already oversubscribed Kings Cross >>>>> to Edinburgh services.

    The buffet at Peterborough wouldn't sell alcohol before 10am (it was >>>>> clearly going to be impossible to get to an on-train buffet what with >>>>> the overcrowding). "Is this a new thing" I asked. "No", they lied, "it's >>>>> always been like that".

    My booked train (no reservation, but the ticket said "09:48, arr EDI >>>>> 13:22") was on time but full and standing, and only coach C was
    "unreserved", but that was partly a lie as well, because half of it
    *was* reserved. I propped myself up on the end of a table, with bags in >>>>> the aisle (because all the overhead racks were rammed full).

    Much hilarity ensued with people turning up with reservations, and
    people in the seats refusing to budge, but that'll be the topic of a >>>>> later posting.

    Quite a few tannoy announcements, but entirely inaudible. Next stop was >>>>> supposed to be York (and so it remained on the PIS) but it did an
    unscheduled stop at Doncaster.

    At which point several people opportunistically boarded and proceeded to >>>>> barge their way down the aisle. One managed to kick me firmly on the >>>>> shin in the process, to which I complained. Their response "I did say >>>>> PLEASE".

    Overall on the trip I counted about five instances of people treading on >>>>> my toes, none of whom were the slightest bit apologetic. Given I have >>>>> gout, it's not a trivial assault.

    The train got progressively later, eventually being I think 28 minutes >>>>> late. Which meant I missed my connection. The only train crew we saw was >>>>> someone coming through asking for passengers to Inverness, and initially >>>>> promising their connection would be held, but later saying "no it won't >>>>> be". Quite a bit of delay-repay there, I'll wager.

    At Waverley I was still looking for cash, but all three ATMs in the
    waiting area next to the Brewdog pub were broken. Passengers on the
    still full-and-standing train had been waved thought the barriers on >>>>> arrival, otherwise there'd have probably been a riot.

    Scotrail Express to Glasgow was less crowded (but I did recognise
    several pax from the KGX train). Another chat with friendly gripper
    about pay-per-scan-bounty.

    Luckily(?) it was two minutes late, hence I have a 32 minute delay repay >>>>> to claim. It would have been irritating had it been one minute early. >>>>>
    Met with the person I had travelled to see, and soon waiting for the >>>>> Express back to Edinburgh. They didn't announce the platform until 4 >>>>> minutes before departure, which created a considerable scrum at the
    barriers.

    At Waverley, the London train was at an unbarriered platform some
    distance from te concourse, and with my reserved seat in Coach J, it >>>>> felt like I'd already walked halfway home. Quite lightly loaded, so
    reservation was moot. No train crew seen all the way back to
    Peterborough.

    ... Where they'd fixed the lift to the far island platform, but failed >>>>> to remove signage warning it was broken.

    And the departure board was stuffed with delays.

    Thameslink still borked, with one Horsham train cancelled "Problems at >>>>> depot" and another "Delayed due to a points failure".

    20:52 to Leeds "11 late, due to points failure"
    20:53 to Birmingham "18 late, due to train crew delayed by earlier
    delays"
    21:08 to Kings Cross "Delayed due to points failure" and
    21:16 to Stansted "8 late due to a fault on the train earlier"

    I got on that one, which had been quite nicely refurbished (and the
    outside was very white, rather than XC colours).

    But the wifi wouldn't connect to my laptop and the disabled loo in my >>>>> carriage was, err, disabled (locked out of use). No train crew gripping, >>>>> and the barriers at my destination locked open because everyone had gone >>>>> home.

    Nobody, all day, asked to see my railcard.

    Did you go first or second class?

    As I was on a budget, and didn't want to commit to specific trains, it
    was Standard(sic) Class walk-up.

    Doing a search just now for the same tickets for next Monday, First
    Class would be over -u250 more expensive (-u130 if I was prepared to risk >>> fixed-time singles - incidentally historically hard to find had I chosen >>> Plan A to go EUS-GLA direct, but next Monday roughly the same price as
    ECML. Shame the trains were cancelled last Monday).

    Which raises an interesting question: If doing a return trip and the
    outbound train is late, could one use the return leg on a different
    train without penalty? There seems to be an assumption in the system
    that you'd be going out and back on different days, so a delay on the
    first wouldn't impact one's ability to catch the correct train on the
    way back.

    Most long distance UK trains arenrCOt fit for purpose in second class, at
    least in my opinion. Far too cramped, both from the perspective of the
    restrictive loading gauge and the desire to shoe horn in as many seats as
    possible.

    The return leg on an identical train was perfectly OK. It was the
    loading which caused the issues northbound.

    And IrCOm sticking to second class as the nomenclature, as that is
    what it is. ItrCOs one reason I prefer easyJet to Glasgow. ThatrCOs cramped, >> but you only sit in the seat for 45 minutes. (From Birmingham)

    As I said before, I couldn't realistically fly because of the luggage I
    had on the return trip. And it would have been from Stansted as the
    train service from Cambs to Birmingham Airport is terrible (and
    virtually no First Class accommodation).

    Loading, or over loading, is another problem with second class. It tends
    not to be an issue in first. IrCOve been on a long distance XC service where second was full and standing, but first was just fine.

    I wasnrCOt suggesting you should fly from Birmingham. But Birmingham Glasgow
    is a good comparison route. It tends to be both cheaper and faster by air
    than train, and IrCOve never had the air service fail to get me there. The train service failed twice.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 13:40:49 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <qd8u9kthe4ag547i4andcebdagbtfnued4@4ax.com>, at 13:03:42 on
    Fri, 15 Aug 2025, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:53:56 -0000 (UTC), Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:42:53 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107n1b4$1297o$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:15:00 on Fri, 15 Aug >>>>> 2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    [I may write another report about the social issues of seat reservations
    and how well people respected them]

    Early Monday morning and I'd already seen on Facebook that the council >>>>>>> had withdrawn the pay-by-phone app from their car park near the station.
    So coins only (u4 a day).

    This is the car park I'd used before with an app, which asked for how >>>>>>> long I was planning on staying, but didn't mention what the units were. >>>>>>> As it's long stay, charging per day, I said "7" (a week's holiday). Of >>>>>>> course, they don't say when days end, is it midnight or 4am?

    So next day, back then, I got a text on my phone to where I was on >>>>>>> holiday abroad saying "Thanks for paying for 7 minutes parking, which we
    rounded up to a day, but if you want to stay longer you need to pay some
    more".

    Walking from there to the station, around the Tesco store, I thought it >>>>>>> might be prudent to get some cash (notes) from the one remaining ATM of >>>>>>> the four they used to have (one now boarded up at the petrol station and
    three by the entrance). It was out of action.

    The station barriers scanned my printed PDF QR-coded ticket
    successfully. There was an inbound passenger unsuccessfully rummaging on
    their phone for their ticket to be let out of the barriers.

    Train was due to depart from the island platform, so I trudged round >>>>>>> there via the only means of access - an underpass. Just as I got there, >>>>>>> they announced a platform change to #1. OK, so back via the underpass. >>>>>>>
    The XC to Stansted timed at the exact same clockface (when they were >>>>>>> both Central Trains, the crews would swap from one to the other) was >>>>>>> cancelled due to signal problems somewhere between Leicester and >>>>>>> Peterborough. Several passengers getting quite agitated about missing >>>>>>> their flights, and the platform staff suggested they take a taxi (at >>>>>>> their own expense, I presume). Central Trains used to say pax should >>>>>>> plan to arrive at Stansted 2hrs before the last check-in time (ie 3hrs >>>>>>> before the flight) to paper over cracks like that.

    EMT train to Peterborough (later to Liverpool) was OK, and had a chat >>>>>>> with the gripper about his pay-per-scan bounty.

    Lift from the platform at Peterborough broken, and pax advised to use >>>>>>> the ex-Royal_Mail overbridge at the other end of the platforms. Queue >>>>>>> for the two unisex toilet cubicles on that platform quite long, so I >>>>>>> waited until on my departure platform.

    Thameslink southbound borked due to "Shortage of train crew".

    First Edinburgh train "delayed due to urgent bridge works", which later >>>>>>> transpired to be in the Durham area.

    Fatality on the Euston line causing havoc with three consecutive Glasgow
    trains cancelled, and pax told to try already oversubscribed Kings Cross
    to Edinburgh services.

    The buffet at Peterborough wouldn't sell alcohol before 10am (it was >>>>>>> clearly going to be impossible to get to an on-train buffet what with >>>>>>> the overcrowding). "Is this a new thing" I asked. "No", they lied, "it's
    always been like that".

    My booked train (no reservation, but the ticket said "09:48, arr EDI >>>>>>> 13:22") was on time but full and standing, and only coach C was
    "unreserved", but that was partly a lie as well, because half of it >>>>>>> *was* reserved. I propped myself up on the end of a table, with bags in >>>>>>> the aisle (because all the overhead racks were rammed full).

    Much hilarity ensued with people turning up with reservations, and >>>>>>> people in the seats refusing to budge, but that'll be the topic of a >>>>>>> later posting.

    Quite a few tannoy announcements, but entirely inaudible. Next stop was >>>>>>> supposed to be York (and so it remained on the PIS) but it did an >>>>>>> unscheduled stop at Doncaster.

    At which point several people opportunistically boarded and proceeded to
    barge their way down the aisle. One managed to kick me firmly on the >>>>>>> shin in the process, to which I complained. Their response "I did say >>>>>>> PLEASE".

    Overall on the trip I counted about five instances of people treading on
    my toes, none of whom were the slightest bit apologetic. Given I have >>>>>>> gout, it's not a trivial assault.

    The train got progressively later, eventually being I think 28 minutes >>>>>>> late. Which meant I missed my connection. The only train crew we saw was
    someone coming through asking for passengers to Inverness, and initially
    promising their connection would be held, but later saying "no it won't >>>>>>> be". Quite a bit of delay-repay there, I'll wager.

    At Waverley I was still looking for cash, but all three ATMs in the >>>>>>> waiting area next to the Brewdog pub were broken. Passengers on the >>>>>>> still full-and-standing train had been waved thought the barriers on >>>>>>> arrival, otherwise there'd have probably been a riot.

    Scotrail Express to Glasgow was less crowded (but I did recognise >>>>>>> several pax from the KGX train). Another chat with friendly gripper >>>>>>> about pay-per-scan-bounty.

    Luckily(?) it was two minutes late, hence I have a 32 minute delay repay
    to claim. It would have been irritating had it been one minute early. >>>>>>>
    Met with the person I had travelled to see, and soon waiting for the >>>>>>> Express back to Edinburgh. They didn't announce the platform until 4 >>>>>>> minutes before departure, which created a considerable scrum at the >>>>>>> barriers.

    At Waverley, the London train was at an unbarriered platform some >>>>>>> distance from te concourse, and with my reserved seat in Coach J, it >>>>>>> felt like I'd already walked halfway home. Quite lightly loaded, so >>>>>>> reservation was moot. No train crew seen all the way back to
    Peterborough.

    ... Where they'd fixed the lift to the far island platform, but failed >>>>>>> to remove signage warning it was broken.

    And the departure board was stuffed with delays.

    Thameslink still borked, with one Horsham train cancelled "Problems at >>>>>>> depot" and another "Delayed due to a points failure".

    20:52 to Leeds "11 late, due to points failure"
    20:53 to Birmingham "18 late, due to train crew delayed by earlier >>>>>>> delays"
    21:08 to Kings Cross "Delayed due to points failure" and
    21:16 to Stansted "8 late due to a fault on the train earlier"

    I got on that one, which had been quite nicely refurbished (and the >>>>>>> outside was very white, rather than XC colours).

    But the wifi wouldn't connect to my laptop and the disabled loo in my >>>>>>> carriage was, err, disabled (locked out of use). No train crew gripping,
    and the barriers at my destination locked open because everyone had gone
    home.

    Nobody, all day, asked to see my railcard.

    Did you go first or second class?

    As I was on a budget, and didn't want to commit to specific trains, it >>>>> was Standard(sic) Class walk-up.

    Doing a search just now for the same tickets for next Monday, First
    Class would be over u250 more expensive (u130 if I was prepared to risk >>>>> fixed-time singles - incidentally historically hard to find had I chosen >>>>> Plan A to go EUS-GLA direct, but next Monday roughly the same price as >>>>> ECML. Shame the trains were cancelled last Monday).

    Which raises an interesting question: If doing a return trip and the >>>>> outbound train is late, could one use the return leg on a different
    train without penalty? There seems to be an assumption in the system >>>>> that you'd be going out and back on different days, so a delay on the >>>>> first wouldn't impact one's ability to catch the correct train on the >>>>> way back.

    Most long distance UK trains aren?t fit for purpose in second class, at >>>> least in my opinion. Far too cramped, both from the perspective of the >>>> restrictive loading gauge and the desire to shoe horn in as many seats as >>>> possible. And I?m sticking to second class as the nomenclature, as that is >>>> what it is. It?s one reason I prefer easyJet to Glasgow. That?s cramped, >>>> but you only sit in the seat for 45 minutes. (From Birmingham)

    It could be worse. In the old days it was Third Class :-)


    True. Having just travelled in that class on the NYMR, both in a >>compartment and an open carriage, I can confidently say that things are >>worse now in terms of comfort, apart from perhaps air conditioning.

    I've recently had several rides in first generation BR DMUs, which even
    in standard class have deep, upholstered, comfortable seats, far better
    than modern British first class seats. And, no, it's nothing to do with
    fire resistance.

    How many carriages would you need to accommodate the 611 seated pax in
    an Azuma with seats like those??

    And posh seats are no use if there's two standing pax for every couple
    of rows of seats, plus half a dozen in each vestibule.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 14:10:55 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <107n9dq$147gd$1@dont-email.me>, at 12:32:58 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:

    It must be a conscious choice to not carry notes,

    I don't carry spare ones.

    so you shouldn't complain when you need some ...

    I expect to be able to pick some up at an ATM, if I need them. Didn't
    seem to be possible on Monday.

    For someone that lays great store about carting around a huge array of bits >and bobs in a rCLroad warriorrCY kit, not having spare bank notes is a bit >remiss.

    I used to have Dollars and Euros in my kit, but why would I need them on
    a trip to Glasgow, when pretty much every place I was likely to buy
    something would be "Card Only".

    Strangely enough my local CoOp was "Cash only" the other day because
    some sort of outage. And they had an ATM in the wall at the front. Until
    the local chavs took it away in the middle of the night (mid January)
    using a JCB. Still not been replaced, nor the rather larger than before hole-in-the wall bricked up (it's still just boarded up).

    The ATM ended up dumped by the side of the road several miles away,
    unopened, so a bit of a waste of everyone's time.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 14:20:35 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <107na3m$14c84$1@dont-email.me>, at 12:44:38 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107n6ft$13ht9$1@dont-email.me>, at 11:42:53 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107n1b4$1297o$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:15:00 on Fri, 15 Aug >>>> 2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    [I may write another report about the social issues of seat reservations >>>>>> and how well people respected them]

    Early Monday morning and I'd already seen on Facebook that the council >>>>>> had withdrawn the pay-by-phone app from their car park near the station. >>>>>> So coins only (-u4 a day).

    This is the car park I'd used before with an app, which asked for how >>>>>> long I was planning on staying, but didn't mention what the units were. >>>>>> As it's long stay, charging per day, I said "7" (a week's holiday). Of >>>>>> course, they don't say when days end, is it midnight or 4am?

    So next day, back then, I got a text on my phone to where I was on >>>>>> holiday abroad saying "Thanks for paying for 7 minutes parking, which we >>>>>> rounded up to a day, but if you want to stay longer you need to pay some >>>>>> more".

    Walking from there to the station, around the Tesco store, I thought it >>>>>> might be prudent to get some cash (notes) from the one remaining ATM of >>>>>> the four they used to have (one now boarded up at the petrol station and >>>>>> three by the entrance). It was out of action.

    The station barriers scanned my printed PDF QR-coded ticket
    successfully. There was an inbound passenger unsuccessfully rummaging on >>>>>> their phone for their ticket to be let out of the barriers.

    Train was due to depart from the island platform, so I trudged round >>>>>> there via the only means of access - an underpass. Just as I got there, >>>>>> they announced a platform change to #1. OK, so back via the underpass. >>>>>>
    The XC to Stansted timed at the exact same clockface (when they were >>>>>> both Central Trains, the crews would swap from one to the other) was >>>>>> cancelled due to signal problems somewhere between Leicester and
    Peterborough. Several passengers getting quite agitated about missing >>>>>> their flights, and the platform staff suggested they take a taxi (at >>>>>> their own expense, I presume). Central Trains used to say pax should >>>>>> plan to arrive at Stansted 2hrs before the last check-in time (ie 3hrs >>>>>> before the flight) to paper over cracks like that.

    EMT train to Peterborough (later to Liverpool) was OK, and had a chat >>>>>> with the gripper about his pay-per-scan bounty.

    Lift from the platform at Peterborough broken, and pax advised to use >>>>>> the ex-Royal_Mail overbridge at the other end of the platforms. Queue >>>>>> for the two unisex toilet cubicles on that platform quite long, so I >>>>>> waited until on my departure platform.

    Thameslink southbound borked due to "Shortage of train crew".

    First Edinburgh train "delayed due to urgent bridge works", which later >>>>>> transpired to be in the Durham area.

    Fatality on the Euston line causing havoc with three consecutive Glasgow >>>>>> trains cancelled, and pax told to try already oversubscribed Kings Cross >>>>>> to Edinburgh services.

    The buffet at Peterborough wouldn't sell alcohol before 10am (it was >>>>>> clearly going to be impossible to get to an on-train buffet what with >>>>>> the overcrowding). "Is this a new thing" I asked. "No", they lied, "it's >>>>>> always been like that".

    My booked train (no reservation, but the ticket said "09:48, arr EDI >>>>>> 13:22") was on time but full and standing, and only coach C was
    "unreserved", but that was partly a lie as well, because half of it >>>>>> *was* reserved. I propped myself up on the end of a table, with bags in >>>>>> the aisle (because all the overhead racks were rammed full).

    Much hilarity ensued with people turning up with reservations, and >>>>>> people in the seats refusing to budge, but that'll be the topic of a >>>>>> later posting.

    Quite a few tannoy announcements, but entirely inaudible. Next stop was >>>>>> supposed to be York (and so it remained on the PIS) but it did an
    unscheduled stop at Doncaster.

    At which point several people opportunistically boarded and proceeded to >>>>>> barge their way down the aisle. One managed to kick me firmly on the >>>>>> shin in the process, to which I complained. Their response "I did say >>>>>> PLEASE".

    Overall on the trip I counted about five instances of people treading on >>>>>> my toes, none of whom were the slightest bit apologetic. Given I have >>>>>> gout, it's not a trivial assault.

    The train got progressively later, eventually being I think 28 minutes >>>>>> late. Which meant I missed my connection. The only train crew we saw was >>>>>> someone coming through asking for passengers to Inverness, and initially >>>>>> promising their connection would be held, but later saying "no it won't >>>>>> be". Quite a bit of delay-repay there, I'll wager.

    At Waverley I was still looking for cash, but all three ATMs in the >>>>>> waiting area next to the Brewdog pub were broken. Passengers on the >>>>>> still full-and-standing train had been waved thought the barriers on >>>>>> arrival, otherwise there'd have probably been a riot.

    Scotrail Express to Glasgow was less crowded (but I did recognise
    several pax from the KGX train). Another chat with friendly gripper >>>>>> about pay-per-scan-bounty.

    Luckily(?) it was two minutes late, hence I have a 32 minute delay repay >>>>>> to claim. It would have been irritating had it been one minute early. >>>>>>
    Met with the person I had travelled to see, and soon waiting for the >>>>>> Express back to Edinburgh. They didn't announce the platform until 4 >>>>>> minutes before departure, which created a considerable scrum at the >>>>>> barriers.

    At Waverley, the London train was at an unbarriered platform some
    distance from te concourse, and with my reserved seat in Coach J, it >>>>>> felt like I'd already walked halfway home. Quite lightly loaded, so >>>>>> reservation was moot. No train crew seen all the way back to
    Peterborough.

    ... Where they'd fixed the lift to the far island platform, but failed >>>>>> to remove signage warning it was broken.

    And the departure board was stuffed with delays.

    Thameslink still borked, with one Horsham train cancelled "Problems at >>>>>> depot" and another "Delayed due to a points failure".

    20:52 to Leeds "11 late, due to points failure"
    20:53 to Birmingham "18 late, due to train crew delayed by earlier >>>>>> delays"
    21:08 to Kings Cross "Delayed due to points failure" and
    21:16 to Stansted "8 late due to a fault on the train earlier"

    I got on that one, which had been quite nicely refurbished (and the >>>>>> outside was very white, rather than XC colours).

    But the wifi wouldn't connect to my laptop and the disabled loo in my >>>>>> carriage was, err, disabled (locked out of use). No train crew gripping, >>>>>> and the barriers at my destination locked open because everyone had gone >>>>>> home.

    Nobody, all day, asked to see my railcard.

    Did you go first or second class?

    As I was on a budget, and didn't want to commit to specific trains, it >>>> was Standard(sic) Class walk-up.

    Doing a search just now for the same tickets for next Monday, First
    Class would be over -u250 more expensive (-u130 if I was prepared to risk >>>> fixed-time singles - incidentally historically hard to find had I chosen >>>> Plan A to go EUS-GLA direct, but next Monday roughly the same price as >>>> ECML. Shame the trains were cancelled last Monday).

    Which raises an interesting question: If doing a return trip and the
    outbound train is late, could one use the return leg on a different
    train without penalty? There seems to be an assumption in the system
    that you'd be going out and back on different days, so a delay on the
    first wouldn't impact one's ability to catch the correct train on the
    way back.

    Most long distance UK trains arenrCOt fit for purpose in second class, at >>> least in my opinion. Far too cramped, both from the perspective of the
    restrictive loading gauge and the desire to shoe horn in as many seats as >>> possible.

    The return leg on an identical train was perfectly OK. It was the
    loading which caused the issues northbound.

    And IrCOm sticking to second class as the nomenclature, as that is
    what it is. ItrCOs one reason I prefer easyJet to Glasgow. ThatrCOs cramped,
    but you only sit in the seat for 45 minutes. (From Birmingham)

    As I said before, I couldn't realistically fly because of the luggage I
    had on the return trip. And it would have been from Stansted as the
    train service from Cambs to Birmingham Airport is terrible (and
    virtually no First Class accommodation).

    Loading, or over loading, is another problem with second class.

    It's be even worse if you tried to cram seven hundred pax into a rake of
    2nd Class Mk1's

    It tends not to be an issue in first.

    In theory to aren't allowed to stand in a FC carriage, unless you have a
    FC ticket.

    IrCOve been on a long distance XC service where second was full and >standing, but first was just fine.

    Probably because like Avanti, they stop selling tickets when they think
    it's getting over-full.

    I wasnrCOt suggesting you should fly from Birmingham. But Birmingham Glasgow >is a good comparison route. It tends to be both cheaper and faster by air >than train, and IrCOve never had the air service fail to get me there. The >train service failed twice.

    Don't forget I was meeting in central Glasgow, so that's two connecting
    legs extra. And to get a flight from Stansted means leaving home about
    three hours before the flight departs. I've only ever flown from Glasgow
    once, so am unsighted as to the minimum time you need to check in.

    The XC trains to/from Stansted from the Cambridge area are very
    frequently cancelled (se my earlier posting).
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 14:51:25 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 13:40:49 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:

    In message <qd8u9kthe4ag547i4andcebdagbtfnued4@4ax.com>, at 13:03:42 on
    Fri, 15 Aug 2025, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:53:56 -0000 (UTC), Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:42:53 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107n1b4$1297o$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:15:00 on Fri, 15 Aug >>>>>> 2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    [I may write another report about the social issues of seat reservations
    and how well people respected them]

    Early Monday morning and I'd already seen on Facebook that the council >>>>>>>> had withdrawn the pay-by-phone app from their car park near the station.
    So coins only (-u4 a day).

    This is the car park I'd used before with an app, which asked for how >>>>>>>> long I was planning on staying, but didn't mention what the units were.
    As it's long stay, charging per day, I said "7" (a week's holiday). Of >>>>>>>> course, they don't say when days end, is it midnight or 4am?

    So next day, back then, I got a text on my phone to where I was on >>>>>>>> holiday abroad saying "Thanks for paying for 7 minutes parking, which we
    rounded up to a day, but if you want to stay longer you need to pay some
    more".

    Walking from there to the station, around the Tesco store, I thought it
    might be prudent to get some cash (notes) from the one remaining ATM of
    the four they used to have (one now boarded up at the petrol station and
    three by the entrance). It was out of action.

    The station barriers scanned my printed PDF QR-coded ticket
    successfully. There was an inbound passenger unsuccessfully rummaging on
    their phone for their ticket to be let out of the barriers.

    Train was due to depart from the island platform, so I trudged round >>>>>>>> there via the only means of access - an underpass. Just as I got there,
    they announced a platform change to #1. OK, so back via the underpass. >>>>>>>>
    The XC to Stansted timed at the exact same clockface (when they were >>>>>>>> both Central Trains, the crews would swap from one to the other) was >>>>>>>> cancelled due to signal problems somewhere between Leicester and >>>>>>>> Peterborough. Several passengers getting quite agitated about missing >>>>>>>> their flights, and the platform staff suggested they take a taxi (at >>>>>>>> their own expense, I presume). Central Trains used to say pax should >>>>>>>> plan to arrive at Stansted 2hrs before the last check-in time (ie 3hrs >>>>>>>> before the flight) to paper over cracks like that.

    EMT train to Peterborough (later to Liverpool) was OK, and had a chat >>>>>>>> with the gripper about his pay-per-scan bounty.

    Lift from the platform at Peterborough broken, and pax advised to use >>>>>>>> the ex-Royal_Mail overbridge at the other end of the platforms. Queue >>>>>>>> for the two unisex toilet cubicles on that platform quite long, so I >>>>>>>> waited until on my departure platform.

    Thameslink southbound borked due to "Shortage of train crew".

    First Edinburgh train "delayed due to urgent bridge works", which later
    transpired to be in the Durham area.

    Fatality on the Euston line causing havoc with three consecutive Glasgow
    trains cancelled, and pax told to try already oversubscribed Kings Cross
    to Edinburgh services.

    The buffet at Peterborough wouldn't sell alcohol before 10am (it was >>>>>>>> clearly going to be impossible to get to an on-train buffet what with >>>>>>>> the overcrowding). "Is this a new thing" I asked. "No", they lied, "it's
    always been like that".

    My booked train (no reservation, but the ticket said "09:48, arr EDI >>>>>>>> 13:22") was on time but full and standing, and only coach C was >>>>>>>> "unreserved", but that was partly a lie as well, because half of it >>>>>>>> *was* reserved. I propped myself up on the end of a table, with bags in
    the aisle (because all the overhead racks were rammed full).

    Much hilarity ensued with people turning up with reservations, and >>>>>>>> people in the seats refusing to budge, but that'll be the topic of a >>>>>>>> later posting.

    Quite a few tannoy announcements, but entirely inaudible. Next stop was
    supposed to be York (and so it remained on the PIS) but it did an >>>>>>>> unscheduled stop at Doncaster.

    At which point several people opportunistically boarded and proceeded to
    barge their way down the aisle. One managed to kick me firmly on the >>>>>>>> shin in the process, to which I complained. Their response "I did say >>>>>>>> PLEASE".

    Overall on the trip I counted about five instances of people treading on
    my toes, none of whom were the slightest bit apologetic. Given I have >>>>>>>> gout, it's not a trivial assault.

    The train got progressively later, eventually being I think 28 minutes >>>>>>>> late. Which meant I missed my connection. The only train crew we saw was
    someone coming through asking for passengers to Inverness, and initially
    promising their connection would be held, but later saying "no it won't
    be". Quite a bit of delay-repay there, I'll wager.

    At Waverley I was still looking for cash, but all three ATMs in the >>>>>>>> waiting area next to the Brewdog pub were broken. Passengers on the >>>>>>>> still full-and-standing train had been waved thought the barriers on >>>>>>>> arrival, otherwise there'd have probably been a riot.

    Scotrail Express to Glasgow was less crowded (but I did recognise >>>>>>>> several pax from the KGX train). Another chat with friendly gripper >>>>>>>> about pay-per-scan-bounty.

    Luckily(?) it was two minutes late, hence I have a 32 minute delay repay
    to claim. It would have been irritating had it been one minute early. >>>>>>>>
    Met with the person I had travelled to see, and soon waiting for the >>>>>>>> Express back to Edinburgh. They didn't announce the platform until 4 >>>>>>>> minutes before departure, which created a considerable scrum at the >>>>>>>> barriers.

    At Waverley, the London train was at an unbarriered platform some >>>>>>>> distance from te concourse, and with my reserved seat in Coach J, it >>>>>>>> felt like I'd already walked halfway home. Quite lightly loaded, so >>>>>>>> reservation was moot. No train crew seen all the way back to
    Peterborough.

    ... Where they'd fixed the lift to the far island platform, but failed >>>>>>>> to remove signage warning it was broken.

    And the departure board was stuffed with delays.

    Thameslink still borked, with one Horsham train cancelled "Problems at >>>>>>>> depot" and another "Delayed due to a points failure".

    20:52 to Leeds "11 late, due to points failure"
    20:53 to Birmingham "18 late, due to train crew delayed by earlier >>>>>>>> delays"
    21:08 to Kings Cross "Delayed due to points failure" and
    21:16 to Stansted "8 late due to a fault on the train earlier" >>>>>>>>
    I got on that one, which had been quite nicely refurbished (and the >>>>>>>> outside was very white, rather than XC colours).

    But the wifi wouldn't connect to my laptop and the disabled loo in my >>>>>>>> carriage was, err, disabled (locked out of use). No train crew gripping,
    and the barriers at my destination locked open because everyone had gone
    home.

    Nobody, all day, asked to see my railcard.

    Did you go first or second class?

    As I was on a budget, and didn't want to commit to specific trains, it >>>>>> was Standard(sic) Class walk-up.

    Doing a search just now for the same tickets for next Monday, First >>>>>> Class would be over -u250 more expensive (-u130 if I was prepared to risk
    fixed-time singles - incidentally historically hard to find had I chosen >>>>>> Plan A to go EUS-GLA direct, but next Monday roughly the same price as >>>>>> ECML. Shame the trains were cancelled last Monday).

    Which raises an interesting question: If doing a return trip and the >>>>>> outbound train is late, could one use the return leg on a different >>>>>> train without penalty? There seems to be an assumption in the system >>>>>> that you'd be going out and back on different days, so a delay on the >>>>>> first wouldn't impact one's ability to catch the correct train on the >>>>>> way back.

    Most long distance UK trains aren?t fit for purpose in second class, at >>>>> least in my opinion. Far too cramped, both from the perspective of the >>>>> restrictive loading gauge and the desire to shoe horn in as many seats as >>>>> possible. And I?m sticking to second class as the nomenclature, as that is
    what it is. It?s one reason I prefer easyJet to Glasgow. That?s cramped, >>>>> but you only sit in the seat for 45 minutes. (From Birmingham)

    It could be worse. In the old days it was Third Class :-)


    True. Having just travelled in that class on the NYMR, both in a >>>compartment and an open carriage, I can confidently say that things are >>>worse now in terms of comfort, apart from perhaps air conditioning.

    I've recently had several rides in first generation BR DMUs, which even
    in standard class have deep, upholstered, comfortable seats, far better >>than modern British first class seats. And, no, it's nothing to do with >>fire resistance.

    How many carriages would you need to accommodate the 611 seated pax in
    an Azuma with seats like those??

    Two 4-car class 115 sets, with a total length of 156m, could accommodate 664 pax (60 first, 604 standard class). But you
    could actually comfortably fit three sets into the platforms used by 10-car Azumas, so a total of just under a thousand
    passengers. That's way more than the typical 684 seats in a 10-car 802.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Rail_Class_115


    And posh seats are no use if there's two standing pax for every couple
    of rows of seats, plus half a dozen in each vestibule.

    The seats aren't fancy, just comfortable.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 14:25:43 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107n9dq$147gd$1@dont-email.me>, at 12:32:58 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:

    It must be a conscious choice to not carry notes,

    I don't carry spare ones.

    so you shouldn't complain when you need some ...

    I expect to be able to pick some up at an ATM, if I need them. Didn't
    seem to be possible on Monday.

    For someone that lays great store about carting around a huge array of bits >> and bobs in a rCLroad warriorrCY kit, not having spare bank notes is a bit >> remiss.

    I used to have Dollars and Euros in my kit, but why would I need them on
    a trip to Glasgow, when pretty much every place I was likely to buy something would be "Card Only".

    Strangely enough my local CoOp was "Cash only" the other day because
    some sort of outage. And they had an ATM in the wall at the front. Until
    the local chavs took it away in the middle of the night (mid January)
    using a JCB. Still not been replaced, nor the rather larger than before hole-in-the wall bricked up (it's still just boarded up).

    The ATM ended up dumped by the side of the road several miles away, unopened, so a bit of a waste of everyone's time.

    Who mentioned Dollars or Euros? ItrCOs sterling that you seem to be lacking.
    My M&S and your co-op example are reasons to carry some bank notes. Not everywhere is card only. I purchased two bottles of water at the Whitby
    station cafe the other day. A pound each with a minimum five pound card purchase. I paid with a 10 pound note and they happily gave change.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Graeme Wall@rail@greywall.demon.co.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 16:04:14 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 15/08/2025 13:11, Tweed wrote:
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:53:56 -0000 (UTC), Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:42:53 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107n1b4$1297o$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:15:00 on Fri, 15 Aug >>>>>> 2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    [I may write another report about the social issues of seat reservations
    and how well people respected them]

    Early Monday morning and I'd already seen on Facebook that the council >>>>>>>> had withdrawn the pay-by-phone app from their car park near the station.
    So coins only (-u4 a day).

    This is the car park I'd used before with an app, which asked for how >>>>>>>> long I was planning on staying, but didn't mention what the units were.
    As it's long stay, charging per day, I said "7" (a week's holiday). Of >>>>>>>> course, they don't say when days end, is it midnight or 4am?

    So next day, back then, I got a text on my phone to where I was on >>>>>>>> holiday abroad saying "Thanks for paying for 7 minutes parking, which we
    rounded up to a day, but if you want to stay longer you need to pay some
    more".

    Walking from there to the station, around the Tesco store, I thought it
    might be prudent to get some cash (notes) from the one remaining ATM of
    the four they used to have (one now boarded up at the petrol station and
    three by the entrance). It was out of action.

    The station barriers scanned my printed PDF QR-coded ticket
    successfully. There was an inbound passenger unsuccessfully rummaging on
    their phone for their ticket to be let out of the barriers.

    Train was due to depart from the island platform, so I trudged round >>>>>>>> there via the only means of access - an underpass. Just as I got there,
    they announced a platform change to #1. OK, so back via the underpass. >>>>>>>>
    The XC to Stansted timed at the exact same clockface (when they were >>>>>>>> both Central Trains, the crews would swap from one to the other) was >>>>>>>> cancelled due to signal problems somewhere between Leicester and >>>>>>>> Peterborough. Several passengers getting quite agitated about missing >>>>>>>> their flights, and the platform staff suggested they take a taxi (at >>>>>>>> their own expense, I presume). Central Trains used to say pax should >>>>>>>> plan to arrive at Stansted 2hrs before the last check-in time (ie 3hrs >>>>>>>> before the flight) to paper over cracks like that.

    EMT train to Peterborough (later to Liverpool) was OK, and had a chat >>>>>>>> with the gripper about his pay-per-scan bounty.

    Lift from the platform at Peterborough broken, and pax advised to use >>>>>>>> the ex-Royal_Mail overbridge at the other end of the platforms. Queue >>>>>>>> for the two unisex toilet cubicles on that platform quite long, so I >>>>>>>> waited until on my departure platform.

    Thameslink southbound borked due to "Shortage of train crew".

    First Edinburgh train "delayed due to urgent bridge works", which later
    transpired to be in the Durham area.

    Fatality on the Euston line causing havoc with three consecutive Glasgow
    trains cancelled, and pax told to try already oversubscribed Kings Cross
    to Edinburgh services.

    The buffet at Peterborough wouldn't sell alcohol before 10am (it was >>>>>>>> clearly going to be impossible to get to an on-train buffet what with >>>>>>>> the overcrowding). "Is this a new thing" I asked. "No", they lied, "it's
    always been like that".

    My booked train (no reservation, but the ticket said "09:48, arr EDI >>>>>>>> 13:22") was on time but full and standing, and only coach C was >>>>>>>> "unreserved", but that was partly a lie as well, because half of it >>>>>>>> *was* reserved. I propped myself up on the end of a table, with bags in
    the aisle (because all the overhead racks were rammed full).

    Much hilarity ensued with people turning up with reservations, and >>>>>>>> people in the seats refusing to budge, but that'll be the topic of a >>>>>>>> later posting.

    Quite a few tannoy announcements, but entirely inaudible. Next stop was
    supposed to be York (and so it remained on the PIS) but it did an >>>>>>>> unscheduled stop at Doncaster.

    At which point several people opportunistically boarded and proceeded to
    barge their way down the aisle. One managed to kick me firmly on the >>>>>>>> shin in the process, to which I complained. Their response "I did say >>>>>>>> PLEASE".

    Overall on the trip I counted about five instances of people treading on
    my toes, none of whom were the slightest bit apologetic. Given I have >>>>>>>> gout, it's not a trivial assault.

    The train got progressively later, eventually being I think 28 minutes >>>>>>>> late. Which meant I missed my connection. The only train crew we saw was
    someone coming through asking for passengers to Inverness, and initially
    promising their connection would be held, but later saying "no it won't
    be". Quite a bit of delay-repay there, I'll wager.

    At Waverley I was still looking for cash, but all three ATMs in the >>>>>>>> waiting area next to the Brewdog pub were broken. Passengers on the >>>>>>>> still full-and-standing train had been waved thought the barriers on >>>>>>>> arrival, otherwise there'd have probably been a riot.

    Scotrail Express to Glasgow was less crowded (but I did recognise >>>>>>>> several pax from the KGX train). Another chat with friendly gripper >>>>>>>> about pay-per-scan-bounty.

    Luckily(?) it was two minutes late, hence I have a 32 minute delay repay
    to claim. It would have been irritating had it been one minute early. >>>>>>>>
    Met with the person I had travelled to see, and soon waiting for the >>>>>>>> Express back to Edinburgh. They didn't announce the platform until 4 >>>>>>>> minutes before departure, which created a considerable scrum at the >>>>>>>> barriers.

    At Waverley, the London train was at an unbarriered platform some >>>>>>>> distance from te concourse, and with my reserved seat in Coach J, it >>>>>>>> felt like I'd already walked halfway home. Quite lightly loaded, so >>>>>>>> reservation was moot. No train crew seen all the way back to
    Peterborough.

    ... Where they'd fixed the lift to the far island platform, but failed >>>>>>>> to remove signage warning it was broken.

    And the departure board was stuffed with delays.

    Thameslink still borked, with one Horsham train cancelled "Problems at >>>>>>>> depot" and another "Delayed due to a points failure".

    20:52 to Leeds "11 late, due to points failure"
    20:53 to Birmingham "18 late, due to train crew delayed by earlier >>>>>>>> delays"
    21:08 to Kings Cross "Delayed due to points failure" and
    21:16 to Stansted "8 late due to a fault on the train earlier" >>>>>>>>
    I got on that one, which had been quite nicely refurbished (and the >>>>>>>> outside was very white, rather than XC colours).

    But the wifi wouldn't connect to my laptop and the disabled loo in my >>>>>>>> carriage was, err, disabled (locked out of use). No train crew gripping,
    and the barriers at my destination locked open because everyone had gone
    home.

    Nobody, all day, asked to see my railcard.

    Did you go first or second class?

    As I was on a budget, and didn't want to commit to specific trains, it >>>>>> was Standard(sic) Class walk-up.

    Doing a search just now for the same tickets for next Monday, First >>>>>> Class would be over -u250 more expensive (-u130 if I was prepared to risk
    fixed-time singles - incidentally historically hard to find had I chosen >>>>>> Plan A to go EUS-GLA direct, but next Monday roughly the same price as >>>>>> ECML. Shame the trains were cancelled last Monday).

    Which raises an interesting question: If doing a return trip and the >>>>>> outbound train is late, could one use the return leg on a different >>>>>> train without penalty? There seems to be an assumption in the system >>>>>> that you'd be going out and back on different days, so a delay on the >>>>>> first wouldn't impact one's ability to catch the correct train on the >>>>>> way back.

    Most long distance UK trains aren?t fit for purpose in second class, at >>>>> least in my opinion. Far too cramped, both from the perspective of the >>>>> restrictive loading gauge and the desire to shoe horn in as many seats as >>>>> possible. And I?m sticking to second class as the nomenclature, as that is
    what it is. It?s one reason I prefer easyJet to Glasgow. That?s cramped, >>>>> but you only sit in the seat for 45 minutes. (From Birmingham)

    It could be worse. In the old days it was Third Class :-)


    True. Having just travelled in that class on the NYMR, both in a
    compartment and an open carriage, I can confidently say that things are
    worse now in terms of comfort, apart from perhaps air conditioning.

    I've recently had several rides in first generation BR DMUs, which even
    in standard class have deep, upholstered,
    comfortable seats, far better than modern British first class seats. And,
    no, it's nothing to do with fire resistance.


    Mind you, Swiss seats can be pretty tough on the posterior, though second class has improved from wooden slatsrCa

    Not sure why the modern railway has such a problem with seats. An easyJet seat is far more comfortable, and they have to meet fire and crash
    resistance targets, not to mention trying to make them as light as
    possible.

    But seat design apart, airline style seating on a train is a scourge. The lack of that was one thing that made the NYMR open second such a pleasure. And the seats line up with the windows. We canrCOt even manage that in first these days.


    Nobody looks out of the windows. As soon as they sit down out comes the
    phone or tablet and they are buried in that for the rest of the journey.
    --
    Graeme Wall
    This account not read.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 16:56:23 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <107ng17$15qfe$1@dont-email.me>, at 14:25:43 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107n9dq$147gd$1@dont-email.me>, at 12:32:58 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:

    It must be a conscious choice to not carry notes,

    I don't carry spare ones.

    so you shouldn't complain when you need some ...

    I expect to be able to pick some up at an ATM, if I need them. Didn't
    seem to be possible on Monday.

    For someone that lays great store about carting around a huge array of bits >>> and bobs in a rCLroad warriorrCY kit, not having spare bank notes is a bit >>> remiss.

    I used to have Dollars and Euros in my kit, but why would I need them on
    a trip to Glasgow, when pretty much every place I was likely to buy
    something would be "Card Only".

    Strangely enough my local CoOp was "Cash only" the other day because
    some sort of outage. And they had an ATM in the wall at the front. Until
    the local chavs took it away in the middle of the night (mid January)
    using a JCB. Still not been replaced, nor the rather larger than before
    hole-in-the wall bricked up (it's still just boarded up).

    The ATM ended up dumped by the side of the road several miles away,
    unopened, so a bit of a waste of everyone's time.

    Who mentioned Dollars or Euros?

    I've said quite a few times my basic kit is for international travel,
    although I'd normally leave un-usable currency at home, as an exception.
    But going for example to Russia, they used to prefer pounds or dollars
    for a taxi ride.

    ItrCOs sterling that you seem to be lacking.

    Because we are beaten over the head over and over and over again that
    only goat-herders use cash any more.

    My M&S and your co-op example are reasons to carry some bank notes. Not >everywhere is card only. I purchased two bottles of water at the Whitby >station cafe the other day. A pound each with a minimum five pound card >purchase.

    That minimum charge is a violation of the T&C with their merchant
    services.

    I paid with a 10 pound note and they happily gave change.

    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :)
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 16:52:20 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <kdeu9kh2o8bmr57uhbrp7pu7qgordh6gdl@4ax.com>, at 14:51:25 on
    Fri, 15 Aug 2025, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 13:40:49 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:

    In message <qd8u9kthe4ag547i4andcebdagbtfnued4@4ax.com>, at 13:03:42 on >>Fri, 15 Aug 2025, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:53:56 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:42:53 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107n1b4$1297o$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:15:00 on Fri, 15 Aug >>>>>>> 2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    [I may write another report about the social issues of seat >>>>>>>>>reservations
    and how well people respected them]

    Early Monday morning and I'd already seen on Facebook that the council
    had withdrawn the pay-by-phone app from their car park near >>>>>>>>>the station.
    So coins only (u4 a day).

    This is the car park I'd used before with an app, which asked for how >>>>>>>>> long I was planning on staying, but didn't mention what the >>>>>>>>>units were.
    As it's long stay, charging per day, I said "7" (a week's holiday). Of
    course, they don't say when days end, is it midnight or 4am? >>>>>>>>>
    So next day, back then, I got a text on my phone to where I was on >>>>>>>>> holiday abroad saying "Thanks for paying for 7 minutes >>>>>>>>>parking, which we
    rounded up to a day, but if you want to stay longer you need >>>>>>>>>to pay some
    more".

    Walking from there to the station, around the Tesco store, I >>>>>>>>>thought it
    might be prudent to get some cash (notes) from the one >>>>>>>>>remaining ATM of
    the four they used to have (one now boarded up at the petrol >>>>>>>>>station and
    three by the entrance). It was out of action.

    The station barriers scanned my printed PDF QR-coded ticket
    successfully. There was an inbound passenger unsuccessfully >>>>>>>>>rummaging on
    their phone for their ticket to be let out of the barriers.

    Train was due to depart from the island platform, so I trudged round >>>>>>>>> there via the only means of access - an underpass. Just as I >>>>>>>>>got there,
    they announced a platform change to #1. OK, so back via the underpass.

    The XC to Stansted timed at the exact same clockface (when they were >>>>>>>>> both Central Trains, the crews would swap from one to the other) was >>>>>>>>> cancelled due to signal problems somewhere between Leicester and >>>>>>>>> Peterborough. Several passengers getting quite agitated about missing >>>>>>>>> their flights, and the platform staff suggested they take a taxi (at >>>>>>>>> their own expense, I presume). Central Trains used to say pax should >>>>>>>>> plan to arrive at Stansted 2hrs before the last check-in time (ie 3hrs
    before the flight) to paper over cracks like that.

    EMT train to Peterborough (later to Liverpool) was OK, and had a chat >>>>>>>>> with the gripper about his pay-per-scan bounty.

    Lift from the platform at Peterborough broken, and pax advised to use >>>>>>>>> the ex-Royal_Mail overbridge at the other end of the platforms. Queue >>>>>>>>> for the two unisex toilet cubicles on that platform quite long, so I >>>>>>>>> waited until on my departure platform.

    Thameslink southbound borked due to "Shortage of train crew". >>>>>>>>>
    First Edinburgh train "delayed due to urgent bridge works", >>>>>>>>>which later
    transpired to be in the Durham area.

    Fatality on the Euston line causing havoc with three >>>>>>>>>consecutive Glasgow
    trains cancelled, and pax told to try already oversubscribed >>>>>>>>>Kings Cross
    to Edinburgh services.

    The buffet at Peterborough wouldn't sell alcohol before 10am (it was >>>>>>>>> clearly going to be impossible to get to an on-train buffet what with >>>>>>>>> the overcrowding). "Is this a new thing" I asked. "No", they >>>>>>>>>lied, "it's
    always been like that".

    My booked train (no reservation, but the ticket said "09:48, arr EDI >>>>>>>>> 13:22") was on time but full and standing, and only coach C was >>>>>>>>> "unreserved", but that was partly a lie as well, because half of it >>>>>>>>> *was* reserved. I propped myself up on the end of a table, >>>>>>>>>with bags in
    the aisle (because all the overhead racks were rammed full). >>>>>>>>>
    Much hilarity ensued with people turning up with reservations, and >>>>>>>>> people in the seats refusing to budge, but that'll be the topic of a >>>>>>>>> later posting.

    Quite a few tannoy announcements, but entirely inaudible. Next >>>>>>>>>stop was
    supposed to be York (and so it remained on the PIS) but it did an >>>>>>>>> unscheduled stop at Doncaster.

    At which point several people opportunistically boarded and >>>>>>>>>proceeded to
    barge their way down the aisle. One managed to kick me firmly on the >>>>>>>>> shin in the process, to which I complained. Their response "I did say >>>>>>>>> PLEASE".

    Overall on the trip I counted about five instances of people >>>>>>>>>treading on
    my toes, none of whom were the slightest bit apologetic. Given I have >>>>>>>>> gout, it's not a trivial assault.

    The train got progressively later, eventually being I think 28 minutes
    late. Which meant I missed my connection. The only train crew >>>>>>>>>we saw was
    someone coming through asking for passengers to Inverness, and >>>>>>>>>initially
    promising their connection would be held, but later saying "no >>>>>>>>>it won't
    be". Quite a bit of delay-repay there, I'll wager.

    At Waverley I was still looking for cash, but all three ATMs in the >>>>>>>>> waiting area next to the Brewdog pub were broken. Passengers on the >>>>>>>>> still full-and-standing train had been waved thought the barriers on >>>>>>>>> arrival, otherwise there'd have probably been a riot.

    Scotrail Express to Glasgow was less crowded (but I did recognise >>>>>>>>> several pax from the KGX train). Another chat with friendly gripper >>>>>>>>> about pay-per-scan-bounty.

    Luckily(?) it was two minutes late, hence I have a 32 minute >>>>>>>>>delay repay
    to claim. It would have been irritating had it been one minute early. >>>>>>>>>
    Met with the person I had travelled to see, and soon waiting for the >>>>>>>>> Express back to Edinburgh. They didn't announce the platform until 4 >>>>>>>>> minutes before departure, which created a considerable scrum at the >>>>>>>>> barriers.

    At Waverley, the London train was at an unbarriered platform some >>>>>>>>> distance from te concourse, and with my reserved seat in Coach J, it >>>>>>>>> felt like I'd already walked halfway home. Quite lightly loaded, so >>>>>>>>> reservation was moot. No train crew seen all the way back to >>>>>>>>> Peterborough.

    ... Where they'd fixed the lift to the far island platform, but failed
    to remove signage warning it was broken.

    And the departure board was stuffed with delays.

    Thameslink still borked, with one Horsham train cancelled "Problems at
    depot" and another "Delayed due to a points failure".

    20:52 to Leeds "11 late, due to points failure"
    20:53 to Birmingham "18 late, due to train crew delayed by earlier >>>>>>>>> delays"
    21:08 to Kings Cross "Delayed due to points failure" and
    21:16 to Stansted "8 late due to a fault on the train earlier" >>>>>>>>>
    I got on that one, which had been quite nicely refurbished (and the >>>>>>>>> outside was very white, rather than XC colours).

    But the wifi wouldn't connect to my laptop and the disabled loo in my >>>>>>>>> carriage was, err, disabled (locked out of use). No train crew >>>>>>>>>gripping,
    and the barriers at my destination locked open because >>>>>>>>>everyone had gone
    home.

    Nobody, all day, asked to see my railcard.

    Did you go first or second class?

    As I was on a budget, and didn't want to commit to specific trains, it >>>>>>> was Standard(sic) Class walk-up.

    Doing a search just now for the same tickets for next Monday, First >>>>>>> Class would be over u250 more expensive (u130 if I was prepared >>>>>>>to risk
    fixed-time singles - incidentally historically hard to find had I chosen
    Plan A to go EUS-GLA direct, but next Monday roughly the same price as >>>>>>> ECML. Shame the trains were cancelled last Monday).

    Which raises an interesting question: If doing a return trip and the >>>>>>> outbound train is late, could one use the return leg on a different >>>>>>> train without penalty? There seems to be an assumption in the system >>>>>>> that you'd be going out and back on different days, so a delay on the >>>>>>> first wouldn't impact one's ability to catch the correct train on the >>>>>>> way back.

    Most long distance UK trains aren?t fit for purpose in second class, at >>>>>> least in my opinion. Far too cramped, both from the perspective of the >>>>>> restrictive loading gauge and the desire to shoe horn in as many seats as
    possible. And I?m sticking to second class as the nomenclature, >>>>>>as that is
    what it is. It?s one reason I prefer easyJet to Glasgow. That?s cramped, >>>>>> but you only sit in the seat for 45 minutes. (From Birmingham)

    It could be worse. In the old days it was Third Class :-)


    True. Having just travelled in that class on the NYMR, both in a >>>>compartment and an open carriage, I can confidently say that things are >>>>worse now in terms of comfort, apart from perhaps air conditioning.

    I've recently had several rides in first generation BR DMUs, which even >>>in standard class have deep, upholstered, comfortable seats, far better >>>than modern British first class seats. And, no, it's nothing to do with >>>fire resistance.

    How many carriages would you need to accommodate the 611 seated pax in
    an Azuma with seats like those??

    Two 4-car class 115 sets, with a total length of 156m, could
    accommodate 664 pax (60 first, 604 standard class). But you
    could actually comfortably fit three sets into the platforms used by
    10-car Azumas, so a total of just under a thousand
    passengers. That's way more than the typical 684 seats in a 10-car 802.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Rail_Class_115

    And posh seats are no use if there's two standing pax for every couple
    of rows of seats, plus half a dozen in each vestibule.

    The seats aren't fancy, just comfortable.

    Even though they are 3+2, which gets a lot of criticism? And 3+3 at the
    ends of compartments (thus no opportunity to move through the train).
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From boltar@boltar@galactica.caprica to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 16:10:29 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 16:56:23 +0100
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wibbled:
    In message <107ng17$15qfe$1@dont-email.me>, at 14:25:43 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    ItrCOs sterling that you seem to be lacking.

    Because we are beaten over the head over and over and over again that
    only goat-herders use cash any more.

    Usually by vested financial interests or politicians who'd like nothing better to track and/or charge for every transaction which they can't do with cash
    and the gullible fall for it.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 17:13:28 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <107ni9f$16a82$1@dont-email.me>, at 16:04:14 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> remarked:
    On 15/08/2025 13:11, Tweed wrote:
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:53:56 -0000 (UTC), Tweed >>><usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:42:53 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107n1b4$1297o$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:15:00 on Fri, 15 Aug >>>>>>> 2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    [I may write another report about the social issues of seat >>>>>>>>>reservations
    and how well people respected them]

    Early Monday morning and I'd already seen on Facebook that the council
    had withdrawn the pay-by-phone app from their car park near >>>>>>>>>the station.
    So coins only (-u4 a day).

    This is the car park I'd used before with an app, which asked for how >>>>>>>>> long I was planning on staying, but didn't mention what the >>>>>>>>>units were.
    As it's long stay, charging per day, I said "7" (a week's holiday). Of
    course, they don't say when days end, is it midnight or 4am? >>>>>>>>>
    So next day, back then, I got a text on my phone to where I was on >>>>>>>>> holiday abroad saying "Thanks for paying for 7 minutes >>>>>>>>>parking, which we
    rounded up to a day, but if you want to stay longer you need >>>>>>>>>to pay some
    more".

    Walking from there to the station, around the Tesco store, I >>>>>>>>>thought it
    might be prudent to get some cash (notes) from the one >>>>>>>>>remaining ATM of
    the four they used to have (one now boarded up at the petrol >>>>>>>>>station and
    three by the entrance). It was out of action.

    The station barriers scanned my printed PDF QR-coded ticket
    successfully. There was an inbound passenger unsuccessfully >>>>>>>>>rummaging on
    their phone for their ticket to be let out of the barriers.

    Train was due to depart from the island platform, so I trudged round >>>>>>>>> there via the only means of access - an underpass. Just as I >>>>>>>>>got there,
    they announced a platform change to #1. OK, so back via the underpass.

    The XC to Stansted timed at the exact same clockface (when they were >>>>>>>>> both Central Trains, the crews would swap from one to the other) was >>>>>>>>> cancelled due to signal problems somewhere between Leicester and >>>>>>>>> Peterborough. Several passengers getting quite agitated about missing >>>>>>>>> their flights, and the platform staff suggested they take a taxi (at >>>>>>>>> their own expense, I presume). Central Trains used to say pax should >>>>>>>>> plan to arrive at Stansted 2hrs before the last check-in time (ie 3hrs
    before the flight) to paper over cracks like that.

    EMT train to Peterborough (later to Liverpool) was OK, and had a chat >>>>>>>>> with the gripper about his pay-per-scan bounty.

    Lift from the platform at Peterborough broken, and pax advised to use >>>>>>>>> the ex-Royal_Mail overbridge at the other end of the platforms. Queue >>>>>>>>> for the two unisex toilet cubicles on that platform quite long, so I >>>>>>>>> waited until on my departure platform.

    Thameslink southbound borked due to "Shortage of train crew". >>>>>>>>>
    First Edinburgh train "delayed due to urgent bridge works", >>>>>>>>>which later
    transpired to be in the Durham area.

    Fatality on the Euston line causing havoc with three >>>>>>>>>consecutive Glasgow
    trains cancelled, and pax told to try already oversubscribed >>>>>>>>>Kings Cross
    to Edinburgh services.

    The buffet at Peterborough wouldn't sell alcohol before 10am (it was >>>>>>>>> clearly going to be impossible to get to an on-train buffet what with >>>>>>>>> the overcrowding). "Is this a new thing" I asked. "No", they >>>>>>>>>lied, "it's
    always been like that".

    My booked train (no reservation, but the ticket said "09:48, arr EDI >>>>>>>>> 13:22") was on time but full and standing, and only coach C was >>>>>>>>> "unreserved", but that was partly a lie as well, because half of it >>>>>>>>> *was* reserved. I propped myself up on the end of a table, >>>>>>>>>with bags in
    the aisle (because all the overhead racks were rammed full). >>>>>>>>>
    Much hilarity ensued with people turning up with reservations, and >>>>>>>>> people in the seats refusing to budge, but that'll be the topic of a >>>>>>>>> later posting.

    Quite a few tannoy announcements, but entirely inaudible. Next >>>>>>>>>stop was
    supposed to be York (and so it remained on the PIS) but it did an >>>>>>>>> unscheduled stop at Doncaster.

    At which point several people opportunistically boarded and >>>>>>>>>proceeded to
    barge their way down the aisle. One managed to kick me firmly on the >>>>>>>>> shin in the process, to which I complained. Their response "I did say >>>>>>>>> PLEASE".

    Overall on the trip I counted about five instances of people >>>>>>>>>treading on
    my toes, none of whom were the slightest bit apologetic. Given I have >>>>>>>>> gout, it's not a trivial assault.

    The train got progressively later, eventually being I think 28 minutes
    late. Which meant I missed my connection. The only train crew >>>>>>>>>we saw was
    someone coming through asking for passengers to Inverness, and >>>>>>>>>initially
    promising their connection would be held, but later saying "no >>>>>>>>>it won't
    be". Quite a bit of delay-repay there, I'll wager.

    At Waverley I was still looking for cash, but all three ATMs in the >>>>>>>>> waiting area next to the Brewdog pub were broken. Passengers on the >>>>>>>>> still full-and-standing train had been waved thought the barriers on >>>>>>>>> arrival, otherwise there'd have probably been a riot.

    Scotrail Express to Glasgow was less crowded (but I did recognise >>>>>>>>> several pax from the KGX train). Another chat with friendly gripper >>>>>>>>> about pay-per-scan-bounty.

    Luckily(?) it was two minutes late, hence I have a 32 minute >>>>>>>>>delay repay
    to claim. It would have been irritating had it been one minute early. >>>>>>>>>
    Met with the person I had travelled to see, and soon waiting for the >>>>>>>>> Express back to Edinburgh. They didn't announce the platform until 4 >>>>>>>>> minutes before departure, which created a considerable scrum at the >>>>>>>>> barriers.

    At Waverley, the London train was at an unbarriered platform some >>>>>>>>> distance from te concourse, and with my reserved seat in Coach J, it >>>>>>>>> felt like I'd already walked halfway home. Quite lightly loaded, so >>>>>>>>> reservation was moot. No train crew seen all the way back to >>>>>>>>> Peterborough.

    ... Where they'd fixed the lift to the far island platform, but failed
    to remove signage warning it was broken.

    And the departure board was stuffed with delays.

    Thameslink still borked, with one Horsham train cancelled "Problems at
    depot" and another "Delayed due to a points failure".

    20:52 to Leeds "11 late, due to points failure"
    20:53 to Birmingham "18 late, due to train crew delayed by earlier >>>>>>>>> delays"
    21:08 to Kings Cross "Delayed due to points failure" and
    21:16 to Stansted "8 late due to a fault on the train earlier" >>>>>>>>>
    I got on that one, which had been quite nicely refurbished (and the >>>>>>>>> outside was very white, rather than XC colours).

    But the wifi wouldn't connect to my laptop and the disabled loo in my >>>>>>>>> carriage was, err, disabled (locked out of use). No train crew >>>>>>>>>gripping,
    and the barriers at my destination locked open because >>>>>>>>>everyone had gone
    home.

    Nobody, all day, asked to see my railcard.

    Did you go first or second class?

    As I was on a budget, and didn't want to commit to specific trains, it >>>>>>> was Standard(sic) Class walk-up.

    Doing a search just now for the same tickets for next Monday, First >>>>>>> Class would be over -u250 more expensive (-u130 if I was >>>>>>>prepared to risk
    fixed-time singles - incidentally historically hard to find had I chosen
    Plan A to go EUS-GLA direct, but next Monday roughly the same price as >>>>>>> ECML. Shame the trains were cancelled last Monday).

    Which raises an interesting question: If doing a return trip and the >>>>>>> outbound train is late, could one use the return leg on a different >>>>>>> train without penalty? There seems to be an assumption in the system >>>>>>> that you'd be going out and back on different days, so a delay on the >>>>>>> first wouldn't impact one's ability to catch the correct train on the >>>>>>> way back.

    Most long distance UK trains aren?t fit for purpose in second class, at >>>>>> least in my opinion. Far too cramped, both from the perspective of the >>>>>> restrictive loading gauge and the desire to shoe horn in as many seats as
    possible. And I?m sticking to second class as the nomenclature, >>>>>>as that is
    what it is. It?s one reason I prefer easyJet to Glasgow. That?s cramped, >>>>>> but you only sit in the seat for 45 minutes. (From Birmingham)

    It could be worse. In the old days it was Third Class :-)


    True. Having just travelled in that class on the NYMR, both in a
    compartment and an open carriage, I can confidently say that things are >>>> worse now in terms of comfort, apart from perhaps air conditioning.

    I've recently had several rides in first generation BR DMUs, which even
    in standard class have deep, upholstered,
    comfortable seats, far better than modern British first class seats. And, >>> no, it's nothing to do with fire resistance.

    Mind you, Swiss seats can be pretty tough on the posterior, though >>second
    class has improved from wooden slatsrCa
    Not sure why the modern railway has such a problem with seats. An >>easyJet
    seat is far more comfortable, and they have to meet fire and crash
    resistance targets, not to mention trying to make them as light as
    possible.
    But seat design apart, airline style seating on a train is a
    scourge. The
    lack of that was one thing that made the NYMR open second such a pleasure. >> And the seats line up with the windows. We canrCOt even manage that in first >> these days.


    Nobody looks out of the windows. As soon as they sit down out comes the >phone or tablet and they are buried in that for the rest of the
    journey.

    Not entirely true. I was advised to book a seat with an eastern aspect
    to see the coast around the border. And on that train, seven out of the nearest twelve seats to me were occupied by infants, none of whom had
    phones or tablets (or indeed what we'd normally call decent manners).
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 17:15:48 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <107nm5l$17g6r$1@dont-email.me>, at 16:10:29 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, boltar@galactica.caprica remarked:
    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 16:56:23 +0100
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wibbled:
    In message <107ng17$15qfe$1@dont-email.me>, at 14:25:43 on Fri, 15 Aug >>2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    It|ore4raos sterling that you seem to be lacking.

    Because we are beaten over the head over and over and over again that
    only goat-herders use cash any more.

    Usually by vested financial interests or politicians who'd like nothing better >to track and/or charge for every transaction which they can't do with cash >and the gullible fall for it.

    More often by geeks who can't understand why anyone would want paper
    money, paper train tickets, etc etc etc.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 16:48:26 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107ng17$15qfe$1@dont-email.me>, at 14:25:43 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107n9dq$147gd$1@dont-email.me>, at 12:32:58 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:

    It must be a conscious choice to not carry notes,

    I don't carry spare ones.

    so you shouldn't complain when you need some ...

    I expect to be able to pick some up at an ATM, if I need them. Didn't >>>>> seem to be possible on Monday.

    For someone that lays great store about carting around a huge array of bits
    and bobs in a rCLroad warriorrCY kit, not having spare bank notes is a bit >>>> remiss.

    I used to have Dollars and Euros in my kit, but why would I need them on >>> a trip to Glasgow, when pretty much every place I was likely to buy
    something would be "Card Only".

    Strangely enough my local CoOp was "Cash only" the other day because
    some sort of outage. And they had an ATM in the wall at the front. Until >>> the local chavs took it away in the middle of the night (mid January)
    using a JCB. Still not been replaced, nor the rather larger than before
    hole-in-the wall bricked up (it's still just boarded up).

    The ATM ended up dumped by the side of the road several miles away,
    unopened, so a bit of a waste of everyone's time.

    Who mentioned Dollars or Euros?

    I've said quite a few times my basic kit is for international travel, although I'd normally leave un-usable currency at home, as an exception.
    But going for example to Russia, they used to prefer pounds or dollars
    for a taxi ride.

    ItrCOs sterling that you seem to be lacking.

    Because we are beaten over the head over and over and over again that
    only goat-herders use cash any more.

    My M&S and your co-op example are reasons to carry some bank notes. Not
    everywhere is card only. I purchased two bottles of water at the Whitby
    station cafe the other day. A pound each with a minimum five pound card
    purchase.

    That minimum charge is a violation of the T&C with their merchant
    services.

    I paid with a 10 pound note and they happily gave change.

    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :)


    YourCOd go thirsty.
    I donrCOt think anyone says you should not carry cash. ItrCOs just those that insist that cash is a preferable means of exchange where the issue lies.
    But just occasionally cash is the only option.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Theo@theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 18:01:36 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <kdeu9kh2o8bmr57uhbrp7pu7qgordh6gdl@4ax.com>, at 14:51:25 on
    Fri, 15 Aug 2025, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 13:40:49 +0100, Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:

    [humungous snippage]

    How many carriages would you need to accommodate the 611 seated pax in
    an Azuma with seats like those??

    Two 4-car class 115 sets, with a total length of 156m, could
    accommodate 664 pax (60 first, 604 standard class). But you
    could actually comfortably fit three sets into the platforms used by >10-car Azumas, so a total of just under a thousand
    passengers. That's way more than the typical 684 seats in a 10-car 802.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Rail_Class_115

    And posh seats are no use if there's two standing pax for every couple
    of rows of seats, plus half a dozen in each vestibule.

    The seats aren't fancy, just comfortable.

    Even though they are 3+2, which gets a lot of criticism? And 3+3 at the
    ends of compartments (thus no opportunity to move through the train).

    A classic Mk1 TSO has 64 seats in 2+2 configuration, a Mk1 FO has 42 in 2+1. They are 19.66m long, with through corridors. A class 800/1 is 233.7m long.

    In 235.9m you can fit 12 Mk1 coaches, which gets you 768 pax in all-standard, 504 in all-first, or a mix in between. If we call it 4 coaches of first and
    8 coaches of standard, that gets you 680 pax.

    (ok, slight differences because a rake of Mk1s doesn't have driving cabs or dead space in the leading units, and we haven't included any catering provision. But they can still reach similar capacity)

    Theo
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Graeme Wall@rail@greywall.demon.co.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 19:14:23 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 15/08/2025 17:13, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <107ni9f$16a82$1@dont-email.me>, at 16:04:14 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> remarked:
    On 15/08/2025 13:11, Tweed wrote:
    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:53:56 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:42:53 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107n1b4$1297o$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:15:00 on Fri, >>>>>>>> 15 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    [I may write another report about the social issues of seat >>>>>>>>>> reservations
    and how well people respected them]

    Early Monday morning and I'd already seen on Facebook that the >>>>>>>>>> council
    had withdrawn the pay-by-phone app from their car park near >>>>>>>>>> the station.
    So coins only (-u4 a day).

    This is the car park I'd used before with an app, which asked >>>>>>>>>> for how
    long I was planning on staying, but didn't mention what the >>>>>>>>>> units were.
    As it's long stay, charging per day, I said "7" (a week's >>>>>>>>>> holiday). Of
    course, they don't say when days end, is it midnight or 4am? >>>>>>>>>>
    So next day, back then, I got a text on my phone to where I >>>>>>>>>> was on
    holiday abroad saying "Thanks for paying for 7 minutes
    parking, which we
    rounded up to a day, but if you want to stay longer you need >>>>>>>>>> to pay some
    more".

    Walking from there to the station, around the Tesco store, I >>>>>>>>>> thought it
    might be prudent to get some cash (notes) from the one
    remaining ATM of
    the four they used to have (one now boarded up at the petrol >>>>>>>>>> station and
    three by the entrance). It was out of action.

    The station barriers scanned my printed PDF QR-coded ticket >>>>>>>>>> successfully. There was an inbound passenger unsuccessfully >>>>>>>>>> rummaging on
    their phone for their ticket to be let out of the barriers. >>>>>>>>>>
    Train was due to depart from the island platform, so I trudged >>>>>>>>>> round
    there via the only means of access - an underpass. Just as I >>>>>>>>>> got there,
    they announced a platform change to #1. OK, so back via the >>>>>>>>>> underpass.

    The XC to Stansted timed at the exact same clockface (when >>>>>>>>>> they were
    both Central Trains, the crews would swap from one to the >>>>>>>>>> other) was
    cancelled due to signal problems somewhere between Leicester and >>>>>>>>>> Peterborough. Several passengers getting quite agitated about >>>>>>>>>> missing
    their flights, and the platform staff suggested they take a >>>>>>>>>> taxi (at
    their own expense, I presume). Central Trains used to say pax >>>>>>>>>> should
    plan to arrive at Stansted 2hrs before the last check-in time >>>>>>>>>> (ie 3hrs
    before the flight) to paper over cracks like that.

    EMT train to Peterborough (later to Liverpool) was OK, and had >>>>>>>>>> a chat
    with the gripper about his pay-per-scan bounty.

    Lift from the platform at Peterborough broken, and pax advised >>>>>>>>>> to use
    the ex-Royal_Mail overbridge at the other end of the
    platforms. Queue
    for the two unisex toilet cubicles on that platform quite >>>>>>>>>> long, so I
    waited until on my departure platform.

    Thameslink southbound borked due to "Shortage of train crew". >>>>>>>>>>
    First Edinburgh train "delayed due to urgent bridge works", >>>>>>>>>> which later
    transpired to be in the Durham area.

    Fatality on the Euston line causing havoc with three
    consecutive Glasgow
    trains cancelled, and pax told to try already oversubscribed >>>>>>>>>> Kings Cross
    to Edinburgh services.

    The buffet at Peterborough wouldn't sell alcohol before 10am >>>>>>>>>> (it was
    clearly going to be impossible to get to an on-train buffet >>>>>>>>>> what with
    the overcrowding). "Is this a new thing" I asked. "No", they >>>>>>>>>> lied, "it's
    always been like that".

    My booked train (no reservation, but the ticket said "09:48, >>>>>>>>>> arr EDI
    13:22") was on time but full and standing, and only coach C was >>>>>>>>>> "unreserved", but that was partly a lie as well, because half >>>>>>>>>> of it
    *was* reserved. I propped myself up on the end of a table, >>>>>>>>>> with bags in
    the aisle (because all the overhead racks were rammed full). >>>>>>>>>>
    Much hilarity ensued with people turning up with reservations, >>>>>>>>>> and
    people in the seats refusing to budge, but that'll be the >>>>>>>>>> topic of a
    later posting.

    Quite a few tannoy announcements, but entirely inaudible. Next >>>>>>>>>> stop was
    supposed to be York (and so it remained on the PIS) but it did an >>>>>>>>>> unscheduled stop at Doncaster.

    At which point several people opportunistically boarded and >>>>>>>>>> proceeded to
    barge their way down the aisle. One managed to kick me firmly >>>>>>>>>> on the
    shin in the process, to which I complained. Their response "I >>>>>>>>>> did say
    PLEASE".

    Overall on the trip I counted about five instances of people >>>>>>>>>> treading on
    my toes, none of whom were the slightest bit apologetic. Given >>>>>>>>>> I have
    gout, it's not a trivial assault.

    The train got progressively later, eventually being I think 28 >>>>>>>>>> minutes
    late. Which meant I missed my connection. The only train crew >>>>>>>>>> we saw was
    someone coming through asking for passengers to Inverness, and >>>>>>>>>> initially
    promising their connection would be held, but later saying "no >>>>>>>>>> it won't
    be". Quite a bit of delay-repay there, I'll wager.

    At Waverley I was still looking for cash, but all three ATMs >>>>>>>>>> in the
    waiting area next to the Brewdog pub were broken. Passengers >>>>>>>>>> on the
    still full-and-standing train had been waved thought the
    barriers on
    arrival, otherwise there'd have probably been a riot.

    Scotrail Express to Glasgow was less crowded (but I did recognise >>>>>>>>>> several pax from the KGX train). Another chat with friendly >>>>>>>>>> gripper
    about pay-per-scan-bounty.

    Luckily(?) it was two minutes late, hence I have a 32 minute >>>>>>>>>> delay repay
    to claim. It would have been irritating had it been one minute >>>>>>>>>> early.

    Met with the person I had travelled to see, and soon waiting >>>>>>>>>> for the
    Express back to Edinburgh. They didn't announce the platform >>>>>>>>>> until 4
    minutes before departure, which created a considerable scrum >>>>>>>>>> at the
    barriers.

    At Waverley, the London train was at an unbarriered platform some >>>>>>>>>> distance from te concourse, and with my reserved seat in Coach >>>>>>>>>> J, it
    felt like I'd already walked halfway home. Quite lightly
    loaded, so
    reservation was moot. No train crew seen all the way back to >>>>>>>>>> Peterborough.

    ... Where they'd fixed the lift to the far island platform, >>>>>>>>>> but failed
    to remove signage warning it was broken.

    And the departure board was stuffed with delays.

    Thameslink still borked, with one Horsham train cancelled >>>>>>>>>> "Problems at
    depot" and another "Delayed due to a points failure".

    20:52 to Leeds "11 late, due to points failure"
    20:53 to Birmingham "18 late, due to train crew delayed by >>>>>>>>>> earlier
    delays"
    21:08 to Kings Cross "Delayed due to points failure" and
    21:16 to Stansted "8 late due to a fault on the train earlier" >>>>>>>>>>
    I got on that one, which had been quite nicely refurbished >>>>>>>>>> (and the
    outside was very white, rather than XC colours).

    But the wifi wouldn't connect to my laptop and the disabled >>>>>>>>>> loo in my
    carriage was, err, disabled (locked out of use). No train crew >>>>>>>>>> gripping,
    and the barriers at my destination locked open because
    everyone had gone
    home.

    Nobody, all day, asked to see my railcard.

    Did you go first or second class?

    As I was on a budget, and didn't want to commit to specific
    trains, it
    was Standard(sic) Class walk-up.

    Doing a search just now for the same tickets for next Monday, First >>>>>>>> Class would be over -u250 more expensive (-u130 if I was prepared >>>>>>>> to risk
    fixed-time singles - incidentally historically hard to find had >>>>>>>> I chosen
    Plan A to go EUS-GLA direct, but next Monday roughly the same >>>>>>>> price as
    ECML. Shame the trains were cancelled last Monday).

    Which raises an interesting question: If doing a return trip and >>>>>>>> the
    outbound train is late, could one use the return leg on a different >>>>>>>> train without penalty? There seems to be an assumption in the >>>>>>>> system
    that you'd be going out and back on different days, so a delay >>>>>>>> on the
    first wouldn't impact one's ability to catch the correct train >>>>>>>> on the
    way back.

    Most long distance UK trains aren?t fit for purpose in second
    class, at
    least in my opinion. Far too cramped, both from the perspective >>>>>>> of the
    restrictive loading gauge and the desire to shoe horn in as many >>>>>>> seats as
    possible. And I?m sticking to second class as the nomenclature, >>>>>>> as that is
    what it is. It?s one reason I prefer easyJet to Glasgow. That?s >>>>>>> cramped,
    but you only sit in the seat for 45 minutes. (From Birmingham)

    It could be worse. In the old days it was Third Class :-)


    True. Having just travelled in that class on the NYMR, both in a
    compartment and an open carriage, I can confidently say that things >>>>> are
    worse now in terms of comfort, apart from perhaps air conditioning.

    I've recently had several rides in first generation BR DMUs, which even >>>> in standard class have deep, upholstered,
    comfortable seats, far better than modern British first class seats.
    And,
    no, it's nothing to do with fire resistance.

    -aMind you, Swiss seats can be pretty tough on the posterior, though
    second
    class has improved from wooden slatsrCa
    -aNot sure why the modern railway has such a problem with seats. An
    easyJet
    seat is far more comfortable, and they have to meet fire and crash
    resistance targets, not to mention trying to make them as light as
    possible.
    -aBut seat design apart, airline style seating on a train is a
    scourge. The
    lack of that was one thing that made the NYMR open second such a
    pleasure.
    And the seats line up with the windows. We canrCOt even manage that in
    first
    these days.


    Nobody looks out of the windows. As soon as they sit down out comes
    the phone or tablet and they are buried in that for the rest of the
    journey.

    Not entirely true. I was advised to book a seat with an eastern aspect
    to see the coast around the border. And on that train, seven out of the nearest twelve seats to me were occupied by infants, none of whom had
    phones or tablets (or indeed what we'd normally call decent manners).

    Now you are getting desperate to find a reason for disagreement
    --
    Graeme Wall
    This account not read.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 15 21:09:42 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <107ntdv$194ei$1@dont-email.me>, at 19:14:23 on Fri, 15 Aug
    2025, Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> remarked:

    Nobody looks out of the windows. As soon as they sit down out comes
    the phone or tablet and they are buried in that for the rest of the >>>journey.

    Not entirely true. I was advised to book a seat with an eastern
    aspect to see the coast around the border. And on that train, seven
    out of the nearest twelve seats to me were occupied by infants, none
    of whom had phones or tablets (or indeed what we'd normally call
    decent manners).

    Now you are getting desperate to find a reason for disagreement

    Take this up with Tweed (for my seating choice) and the parents (for the
    feral kids).
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JMB99@mb@nospam.net to uk.railway on Sat Aug 16 08:41:57 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 15/08/2025 16:04, Graeme Wall wrote:
    Nobody looks out of the windows. As soon as they sit down out comes the phone or tablet and they are buried in that for the rest of the journey.


    Is that any worse that sitting reading The Sun or latest Mills & Boon
    book as might happen in the past?



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ulf Kutzner@user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid to uk.railway on Sat Aug 16 08:22:03 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway


    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> posted:

    In message <107n5qu$13atg$1@andyburns.eternal-september.org>, at
    12:31:41 on Fri, 15 Aug 2025, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> remarked: >Roland Perry wrote:

    Luckily I did have sufficient coins to pay for the car park, but so >>many places now are "card only" and/or we are surrounded by people
    who scoff at "goat-herders" who want to pay with cash, I don't
    usually have any banknotes available.

    It must be a conscious choice to not carry notes,

    I don't carry spare ones.

    so you shouldn't complain when you need some ...

    I expect to be able to pick some up at an ATM, if I need them. Didn't
    seem to be possible on Monday.

    Your planning replaces coincidence by error.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Graeme Wall@rail@greywall.demon.co.uk to uk.railway on Sat Aug 16 09:59:44 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 16/08/2025 08:41, JMB99 wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:04, Graeme Wall wrote:
    Nobody looks out of the windows. As soon as they sit down out comes
    the phone or tablet and they are buried in that for the rest of the
    journey.


    Is that any worse that sitting reading The Sun or latest Mills & Boon
    book as might happen in the past?




    Just goes to show the travelling public doesn't really care about window alignment.
    --
    Graeme Wall
    This account not read.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ulf Kutzner@user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid to uk.railway on Sat Aug 16 09:24:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway


    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> posted:

    On 16/08/2025 08:41, JMB99 wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:04, Graeme Wall wrote:
    Nobody looks out of the windows. As soon as they sit down out comes
    the phone or tablet and they are buried in that for the rest of the
    journey.


    Is that any worse that sitting reading The Sun or latest Mills & Boon
    book as might happen in the past?




    Just goes to show the travelling public doesn't really care about window alignment.

    See http://www.railfaneurope.net/pix/it/electric/emu/ETR521/interior/An_interior_in_an_EMU_ETR_521_of_FS_at_railway_station_Venezia_Santa_Lucia__using_a_R17080_from_Ferrara3_02_05_2024.jpg

    There may be worse.

    Some passengers like seats distant from windows
    for screen work...


    Regards, ULF
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JMB99@mb@nospam.net to uk.railway on Sat Aug 16 11:43:50 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 16/08/2025 09:59, Graeme Wall wrote:
    Just goes to show the travelling public doesn't really care about window alignment.


    Or that everyone has different priorities / requirments?





    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.railway on Sat Aug 16 11:14:46 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> wrote:
    On 16/08/2025 09:59, Graeme Wall wrote:
    Just goes to show the travelling public doesn't really care about window
    alignment.


    Or that everyone has different priorities / requirments?

    Thing is, having seats aligned to windows doesnrCOt force you to look out of the window. But having a pillar stops gazing stone dead. Even the modern Eurostar trains suffer from this.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Clive Page@usenet@page2.eu to uk.railway on Sat Aug 16 12:59:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :)

    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found several places where cards were not accepted. I had taken the precaution of
    getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro
    notes. A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever
    even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.
    --
    Clive Page

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.railway on Sat Aug 16 12:11:57 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :)

    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found several places where cards were not accepted. I had taken the precaution of
    getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro
    notes. A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever
    even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.


    Some French ATMs will happily dispense you a single 100 euro note if you
    ask for 100 euros. IrCOve learnt to request 90 euros.



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Sat Aug 16 13:21:39 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <107psid$1mmds$1@dont-email.me>, at 12:11:57 on Sat, 16 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :)

    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last
    countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found several
    places where cards were not accepted. I had taken the precaution of
    getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro
    notes. A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever
    even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.

    Some French ATMs will happily dispense you a single 100 euro note if you
    ask for 100 euros. IrCOve learnt to request 90 euros.

    I learnt that 20yrs ago, especially in Switzerland where you'd likely
    end up with a single CH200 note. Which they do accept fairly widely, but somehow just feels "wrong".

    130 is good as well, because you'll almost certainly get at least one 10
    and one 20.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sam Wilson@ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk to uk.railway on Sat Aug 16 12:40:24 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :)

    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found several places where cards were not accepted. I had taken the precaution of
    getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro
    notes. A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever
    even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.

    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty Ferry. The chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash Only Card Machine BrokenrCY.

    Sam
    --
    The entity formerly known as Sam.Wilson@ed.ac.uk
    Spit the dummy to reply
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.railway on Sat Aug 16 13:09:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :)

    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last
    countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found several
    places where cards were not accepted. I had taken the precaution of
    getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro
    notes. A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever
    even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.

    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty Ferry. The chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash Only Card Machine BrokenrCY.

    Sam


    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting cashrCa.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Clive Page@usenet@page2.eu to uk.railway on Sat Aug 16 15:07:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 16/08/2025 13:11, Tweed wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :)

    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last
    countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found several
    places where cards were not accepted. I had taken the precaution of
    getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro
    notes. A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever
    even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.


    Some French ATMs will happily dispense you a single 100 euro note if you
    ask for 100 euros. IrCOve learnt to request 90 euros.




    Some years ago in Geneva I used an ATM to request 500 Swiss Francs -
    this came as one 500 CHF note. I've learned a similar lesson.
    --
    Clive Page

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Clive Page@usenet@page2.eu to uk.railway on Sat Aug 16 15:16:00 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 16/08/2025 14:09, Tweed wrote:

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting cashrCa.

    I can believe that. In a restaurant in Germany a couple of weeks ago I wanted to pay with my Visa card but their machine said "declined". With increasing annoyance and slight embarrassment I then tried another Visa
    card and a Mastercard. My wife tried one of hers. Same result each
    time. I said that our cards had worked elsewhere that same day and
    asked if their machine was faulty. The manager was called and brought
    up another card machine - same results. Fortunately we had just enough
    Euros between us. I am sure they were running some scam, but wasn't
    sure what it was. I certainly didn't add on a tip. Being of a
    suspicious nature, I checked immediately afterwards and none of our
    cards had actually been charged. They might have stolen some details
    but we've had no illicit charges in the days since then. So it remains
    a mystery.
    --
    Clive Page

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.railway on Sat Aug 16 14:37:27 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 16/08/2025 14:09, Tweed wrote:

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting cashrCa. >>
    I can believe that. In a restaurant in Germany a couple of weeks ago I wanted to pay with my Visa card but their machine said "declined". With increasing annoyance and slight embarrassment I then tried another Visa
    card and a Mastercard. My wife tried one of hers. Same result each
    time. I said that our cards had worked elsewhere that same day and
    asked if their machine was faulty. The manager was called and brought
    up another card machine - same results. Fortunately we had just enough Euros between us. I am sure they were running some scam, but wasn't
    sure what it was. I certainly didn't add on a tip. Being of a
    suspicious nature, I checked immediately afterwards and none of our
    cards had actually been charged. They might have stolen some details
    but we've had no illicit charges in the days since then. So it remains
    a mystery.



    That could genuinely be the bank that controlled the restaurantrCOs card machines having a technical bad hair day. Or the restaurantrCOs Internet connection being down perhaps?

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Sat Aug 16 16:31:18 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <107q537$1ol5q$1@dont-email.me>, at 14:37:27 on Sat, 16 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 16/08/2025 14:09, Tweed wrote:

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting cashrCa. >>>
    I can believe that. In a restaurant in Germany a couple of weeks ago I
    wanted to pay with my Visa card but their machine said "declined". With
    increasing annoyance and slight embarrassment I then tried another Visa
    card and a Mastercard. My wife tried one of hers. Same result each
    time. I said that our cards had worked elsewhere that same day and
    asked if their machine was faulty. The manager was called and brought
    up another card machine - same results. Fortunately we had just enough
    Euros between us. I am sure they were running some scam, but wasn't
    sure what it was. I certainly didn't add on a tip. Being of a
    suspicious nature, I checked immediately afterwards and none of our
    cards had actually been charged. They might have stolen some details
    but we've had no illicit charges in the days since then. So it remains
    a mystery.

    That could genuinely be the bank that controlled the restaurantrCOs card >machines having a technical bad hair day. Or the restaurantrCOs Internet >connection being down perhaps?

    But why keep offering the machine to more diners, if all the ones
    earlier in the day had been consistently declined?

    Would the machine even say "declined" if it wasn't in contact with the merchant services (modulo the whole thing being a skimming operation).
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.railway on Sat Aug 16 15:52:31 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107q537$1ol5q$1@dont-email.me>, at 14:37:27 on Sat, 16 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 16/08/2025 14:09, Tweed wrote:

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting cashrCa.

    I can believe that. In a restaurant in Germany a couple of weeks ago I >>> wanted to pay with my Visa card but their machine said "declined". With >>> increasing annoyance and slight embarrassment I then tried another Visa
    card and a Mastercard. My wife tried one of hers. Same result each
    time. I said that our cards had worked elsewhere that same day and
    asked if their machine was faulty. The manager was called and brought
    up another card machine - same results. Fortunately we had just enough
    Euros between us. I am sure they were running some scam, but wasn't
    sure what it was. I certainly didn't add on a tip. Being of a
    suspicious nature, I checked immediately afterwards and none of our
    cards had actually been charged. They might have stolen some details
    but we've had no illicit charges in the days since then. So it remains
    a mystery.

    That could genuinely be the bank that controlled the restaurantrCOs card
    machines having a technical bad hair day. Or the restaurantrCOs Internet
    connection being down perhaps?

    But why keep offering the machine to more diners, if all the ones
    earlier in the day had been consistently declined?

    Would the machine even say "declined" if it wasn't in contact with the merchant services (modulo the whole thing being a skimming operation).

    M&S till card machines showed declined during the start of their ransomware attack. I was trying to pay during the first few minutes of the event.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Marland@gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk to uk.railway on Sat Aug 16 16:58:03 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :)

    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last
    countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found several >>> places where cards were not accepted. I had taken the precaution of
    getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro
    notes. A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever
    even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.

    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty Ferry. The >> chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash Only Card >> Machine BrokenrCY.

    Sam


    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting cashrCa.



    Are you alluding they may not want to let the authorities know what their takings really are?
    ICBW but I think another reason is a business that is on the cusp of going under and the card facilities have been withdrawn by the providers or the
    the business doesnrCOt want any takings going into the bank account where
    they cannot retrieve them as the account is in arrears.

    GH
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.railway on Sat Aug 16 17:13:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Marland <gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk> wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :)

    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last >>>> countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found several >>>> places where cards were not accepted. I had taken the precaution of
    getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro
    notes. A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever >>>> even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.

    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty Ferry. The >>> chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash Only Card >>> Machine BrokenrCY.

    Sam


    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting cashrCa. >>


    Are you alluding they may not want to let the authorities know what their takings really are?
    ICBW but I think another reason is a business that is on the cusp of going under and the card facilities have been withdrawn by the providers or the the business doesnrCOt want any takings going into the bank account where they cannot retrieve them as the account is in arrears.

    GH


    Both reasons you give.
    Cash gives the ability to pay casual employees cash in hand, no employers
    NI, no pension, ability to pay under the minimum wage for desperate
    employees. And of course no need to declare full profits.

    If the business is going under cash gives an immediate cash flow to pay
    wages and suppliers. And I donrCOt think card suppliers pay up on a daily basis.

    As a side note, I understand that card companies donrCOt hand over the money for airline tickets until after the flight. ThatrCOs why they are happy to immediately refund you if the airline goes under. Perhaps this varies by
    the credit rating of the airline.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Graeme Wall@rail@greywall.demon.co.uk to uk.railway on Sat Aug 16 20:36:37 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 16/08/2025 18:13, Tweed wrote:
    Marland <gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk> wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :)

    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last >>>>> countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found several >>>>> places where cards were not accepted. I had taken the precaution of >>>>> getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro
    notes. A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever >>>>> even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.

    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty Ferry. The
    chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash Only Card >>>> Machine BrokenrCY.

    Sam


    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting cashrCa. >>>


    Are you alluding they may not want to let the authorities know what their
    takings really are?
    ICBW but I think another reason is a business that is on the cusp of going >> under and the card facilities have been withdrawn by the providers or the >> the business doesnrCOt want any takings going into the bank account where
    they cannot retrieve them as the account is in arrears.

    GH


    Both reasons you give.
    Cash gives the ability to pay casual employees cash in hand, no employers
    NI, no pension, ability to pay under the minimum wage for desperate employees. And of course no need to declare full profits.

    If the business is going under cash gives an immediate cash flow to pay
    wages and suppliers. And I donrCOt think card suppliers pay up on a daily basis.

    As a side note, I understand that card companies donrCOt hand over the money for airline tickets until after the flight. ThatrCOs why they are happy to immediately refund you if the airline goes under. Perhaps this varies by
    the credit rating of the airline.


    Another reason, especially with organisations like takeaways and
    barbers, is the opportunities for money laundering. More cash appears to
    flow through the business than happens in reality but very difficult to
    check up on.
    --
    Graeme Wall
    This account not read.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From ColinR@rail@greystane.shetland.co.uk to uk.railway on Sat Aug 16 22:12:09 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 16/08/2025 16:52, Tweed wrote:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107q537$1ol5q$1@dont-email.me>, at 14:37:27 on Sat, 16 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 16/08/2025 14:09, Tweed wrote:

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting cashrCa.

    I can believe that. In a restaurant in Germany a couple of weeks ago I >>>> wanted to pay with my Visa card but their machine said "declined". With >>>> increasing annoyance and slight embarrassment I then tried another Visa >>>> card and a Mastercard. My wife tried one of hers. Same result each
    time. I said that our cards had worked elsewhere that same day and
    asked if their machine was faulty. The manager was called and brought >>>> up another card machine - same results. Fortunately we had just enough >>>> Euros between us. I am sure they were running some scam, but wasn't
    sure what it was. I certainly didn't add on a tip. Being of a
    suspicious nature, I checked immediately afterwards and none of our
    cards had actually been charged. They might have stolen some details
    but we've had no illicit charges in the days since then. So it remains >>>> a mystery.

    That could genuinely be the bank that controlled the restaurantrCOs card >>> machines having a technical bad hair day. Or the restaurantrCOs Internet >>> connection being down perhaps?

    But why keep offering the machine to more diners, if all the ones
    earlier in the day had been consistently declined?

    Would the machine even say "declined" if it wasn't in contact with the
    merchant services (modulo the whole thing being a skimming operation).

    M&S till card machines showed declined during the start of their ransomware attack. I was trying to pay during the first few minutes of the event.


    I had my card declined in the Co-op (before the attack). Luckily had
    enough folding for the bill. Spoke to the manager the next day and he confirmed that they had an internet outage that day.

    Cash is king!!
    --
    Colin

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Sun Aug 17 05:30:03 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <107qe85$1qt1p$1@dont-email.me>, at 17:13:41 on Sat, 16 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:

    Cash gives the ability to pay casual employees cash in hand, no employers
    NI, no pension, ability to pay under the minimum wage for desperate >employees. And of course no need to declare full profits.

    If the business is going under cash gives an immediate cash flow to pay
    wages and suppliers. And I donrCOt think card suppliers pay up on a daily >basis.

    When I was running a mail order company in the 70's, Access and
    Barclaycard paid in about a month, Amex in two months. We didn't take
    Diners Club, but I expect they were the same as Amex.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.railway on Sun Aug 17 07:00:52 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107qe85$1qt1p$1@dont-email.me>, at 17:13:41 on Sat, 16 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:

    Cash gives the ability to pay casual employees cash in hand, no employers
    NI, no pension, ability to pay under the minimum wage for desperate
    employees. And of course no need to declare full profits.

    If the business is going under cash gives an immediate cash flow to pay
    wages and suppliers. And I donrCOt think card suppliers pay up on a daily
    basis.

    When I was running a mail order company in the 70's, Access and
    Barclaycard paid in about a month, Amex in two months. We didn't take
    Diners Club, but I expect they were the same as Amex.

    Mr Google says it takes just a couple of business days nowadays, with debit card transactions even faster.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Marland@gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk to uk.railway on Sun Aug 17 09:25:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107qe85$1qt1p$1@dont-email.me>, at 17:13:41 on Sat, 16 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:

    Cash gives the ability to pay casual employees cash in hand, no employers
    NI, no pension, ability to pay under the minimum wage for desperate
    employees. And of course no need to declare full profits.

    If the business is going under cash gives an immediate cash flow to pay
    wages and suppliers. And I donrCOt think card suppliers pay up on a daily
    basis.

    When I was running a mail order company in the 70's, Access and
    Barclaycard paid in about a month, Amex in two months. We didn't take
    Diners Club, but I expect they were the same as Amex.

    Diners Club always seemed a bit of an also ran here in the UK, used to see their logo on establishments but I did not know anyone who had one whereas
    in contrast I knew several with AMEX which despite its pretensions of exclusivity wasnrCOt really hard to obtain, heck they even offered me one.

    Perhaps some our heritage railways should consider the over done provision
    of enamel signs extolling
    Victorian polishes , ink and biscuits and dress a station with 1970rCOs
    brands with adverts for Watneys Red Barrel , Leyland Cars and stickers for Diners Club ,Access cards and Double Green Shield Stamps. Or even the also
    ran Pinks Stamps which were actually owned by the US Green Stamp company
    but found a UK business man had already knicked their idea and colour in
    the UK.

    GH
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Certes@Certes@example.org to uk.railway on Sun Aug 17 11:27:30 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 17/08/2025 10:25, Marland wrote:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107qe85$1qt1p$1@dont-email.me>, at 17:13:41 on Sat, 16 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:

    Cash gives the ability to pay casual employees cash in hand, no employers >>> NI, no pension, ability to pay under the minimum wage for desperate
    employees. And of course no need to declare full profits.

    If the business is going under cash gives an immediate cash flow to pay
    wages and suppliers. And I donrCOt think card suppliers pay up on a daily >>> basis.

    When I was running a mail order company in the 70's, Access and
    Barclaycard paid in about a month, Amex in two months. We didn't take
    Diners Club, but I expect they were the same as Amex.

    Diners Club always seemed a bit of an also ran here in the UK, used to see their logo on establishments but I did not know anyone who had one whereas
    in contrast I knew several with AMEX which despite its pretensions of exclusivity wasnrCOt really hard to obtain, heck they even offered me one.

    Perhaps some our heritage railways should consider the over done provision
    of enamel signs extolling
    Victorian polishes , ink and biscuits and dress a station with 1970rCOs brands with adverts for Watneys Red Barrel , Leyland Cars and stickers for Diners Club ,Access cards and Double Green Shield Stamps. Or even the also ran Pinks Stamps which were actually owned by the US Green Stamp company
    but found a UK business man had already knicked their idea and colour in
    the UK.

    When our Co-op replaced its "divi" by blue stamps, I was given the job
    of sticking them in. We actually bought some useful items with them,
    unlike Green Shield where you needed a lifetime's supply for a toaster.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Clank@clank75@googlemail.com to uk.railway on Sun Aug 17 13:53:55 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 16/08/2025 16:09, Tweed wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :)

    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last
    countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found several >>> places where cards were not accepted. I had taken the precaution of
    getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro
    notes. A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever
    even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.

    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty Ferry. The >> chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash Only Card >> Machine BrokenrCY.

    Sam


    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting cashrCa.

    Indeed; I was in Sofia a couple of weeks ago and noticed that the card
    machine was always broken right up until you said "oh no, I can't afford
    to pay then", and then it would suddenly be fixed.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Marland@gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk to uk.railway on Sun Aug 17 12:48:22 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Certes <Certes@example.org> wrote:


    When our Co-op replaced its "divi" by blue stamps, I was given the job
    of sticking them in. We actually bought some useful items with them,
    unlike Green Shield where you needed a lifetime's supply for a toaster.



    Not if you worked in a petrol station as a part time job in the mid
    seventies when they were offering multiple numbers of stamps, they even had
    to produce stamps worth 10(?) ordinary ones.
    People in a hurray would often not bother and a certain rCLclassrCY of customer viewed them with snobbish disdain so we took the stamps they
    should have had .It was completely against the rules but the petrol station next to our digs was desperately short of evening staff so though one of
    our names was used about 5 of us took turns working, sometimes going for a
    few pints in the pub across the road and swapping over in a shift.
    It was the only way they could keep open. We had no qualms about cheating
    the firm either ( HERON) as they treated their normal employees abominably using every little excuse to deduct things from their wages and the owners reputation H. E Ronson wasnrCOt very savoury even then .
    He later did time in chokey for fraud so that I still have a battery
    charger in my shed that technically is his doesnrCOt trouble me at all. Strangely I managed to sacked but later received a commendation letter for
    the same night. The M27 had opened and passing trade had died appreciably
    so bored one evening I locked up and went to the pub over the road
    intending to reopen later for the late taxis who came in around midnight.
    From the pub we observed some lights come on again and some figures inside
    and so we left the pub entered the filling station and robustly dealt with
    the intruders who we thought were burglars. Turned out they were the
    roving HERON security team who made spot checks on premises so we let them
    get up off the floor .
    The manageress sacked me (again) but later came around with the letter that thanked us for our vigilance , and could we work a couple more weeks of evenings and nights as the trade had dropped so much they would no longer
    be open after 8pm and she could not get anyone else interested just for
    such a short period.

    GH
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Charles Ellson@charlesellson@btinternet.com to uk.railway on Sun Aug 17 16:53:16 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 20:36:37 +0100, Graeme Wall
    <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:

    On 16/08/2025 18:13, Tweed wrote:
    Marland <gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk> wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a u50 note and see what happened :)

    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last >>>>>> countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found several >>>>>> places where cards were not accepted. I had taken the precaution of >>>>>> getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro >>>>>> notes. A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever >>>>>> even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.

    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty Ferry. The
    chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying oCash Only Card >>>>> Machine Brokeno.

    Sam


    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting casha. >>>>


    Are you alluding they may not want to let the authorities know what their >>> takings really are?
    ICBW but I think another reason is a business that is on the cusp of going >>> under and the card facilities have been withdrawn by the providers or the >>> the business doesnAt want any takings going into the bank account where
    they cannot retrieve them as the account is in arrears.

    GH


    Both reasons you give.
    Cash gives the ability to pay casual employees cash in hand, no employers
    NI, no pension, ability to pay under the minimum wage for desperate
    employees. And of course no need to declare full profits.

    If the business is going under cash gives an immediate cash flow to pay
    wages and suppliers. And I donAt think card suppliers pay up on a daily
    basis.

    As a side note, I understand that card companies donAt hand over the money >> for airline tickets until after the flight. ThatAs why they are happy to
    immediately refund you if the airline goes under. Perhaps this varies by
    the credit rating of the airline.


    Another reason, especially with organisations like takeaways and
    barbers, is the opportunities for money laundering. More cash appears to >flow through the business than happens in reality but very difficult to >check up on.

    With the dodgy businesses you have both legal and illegal cashflows.
    The red flag to HMRC and others is that the legal flow (when compared
    to more respectable businesses) is too low, in the past sometimes less
    than the rent and rates.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Marland@gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk to uk.railway on Sun Aug 17 18:40:01 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Charles Ellson <charlesellson@btinternet.com> wrote:
    On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 20:36:37 +0100, Graeme Wall
    <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:

    On 16/08/2025 18:13, Tweed wrote:
    Marland <gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk> wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :) >>>>>>>
    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last >>>>>>> countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found several
    places where cards were not accepted. I had taken the precaution of >>>>>>> getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro >>>>>>> notes. A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever >>>>>>> even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.

    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty Ferry. The
    chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying -oCash Only Card
    Machine Broken-o.

    Sam


    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting cash-a.



    Are you alluding they may not want to let the authorities know what their >>>> takings really are?
    ICBW but I think another reason is a business that is on the cusp of going >>>> under and the card facilities have been withdrawn by the providers or the >>>> the business doesn-At want any takings going into the bank account where >>>> they cannot retrieve them as the account is in arrears.

    GH


    Both reasons you give.
    Cash gives the ability to pay casual employees cash in hand, no employers >>> NI, no pension, ability to pay under the minimum wage for desperate
    employees. And of course no need to declare full profits.

    If the business is going under cash gives an immediate cash flow to pay
    wages and suppliers. And I don-At think card suppliers pay up on a daily >>> basis.

    As a side note, I understand that card companies don-At hand over the money >>> for airline tickets until after the flight. That-As why they are happy to >>> immediately refund you if the airline goes under. Perhaps this varies by >>> the credit rating of the airline.


    Another reason, especially with organisations like takeaways and
    barbers, is the opportunities for money laundering. More cash appears to
    flow through the business than happens in reality but very difficult to
    check up on.

    With the dodgy businesses you have both legal and illegal cashflows.
    The red flag to HMRC and others is that the legal flow (when compared
    to more respectable businesses) is too low, in the past sometimes less
    than the rent and rates.


    Its bleeding obvious that a barbers that only sees about 5 customers a day canrCOt support the top of the range BMW car that the rCLownerrCY rocks up in to
    see how his hapless employee is up to.
    Supposedly Turkish but likely still wet off a rubber boat.
    Mind you society has only itself to blame wheneople give custom to such establishments.

    GH
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JMB99@mb@nospam.net to uk.railway on Sun Aug 17 21:38:11 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 17/08/2025 19:40, Marland wrote:
    Its bleeding obvious that a barbers that only sees about 5 customers a day canrCOt support the top of the range BMW car that the rCLownerrCY rocks up in to
    see how his hapless employee is up to.


    Like many others of them, the one down in town appears to be well
    equipped with the latest equipment.

    Often at least three of the staff outside playing on their mobile phones
    and no customers inside.

    There are comments online that are very similar from all over the UK.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Certes@Certes@example.org to uk.railway on Sun Aug 17 21:57:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 17/08/2025 21:38, JMB99 wrote:
    On 17/08/2025 19:40, Marland wrote:
    Its bleeding-a obvious that a barbers that only sees about 5 customers
    a day
    canrCOt support the top of the range BMW car that the rCLownerrCY rocks up >> in to
    see how his hapless-a employee is up to.

    Like many others of them, the one down in town appears to be well
    equipped with the latest equipment.

    Often at least three of the staff outside playing on their mobile phones
    and no customers inside.

    There are comments online that are very similar from all over the UK.

    So they're not doing what was suggested elsewhere in this subthread,
    which is having lots of customers but concealing those who pay cash and
    only paying tax on card-carrying visitors. If there is any wrongdoing,
    which there may well be as you can't buy a BMW on five haircuts a day,
    then it's of some other nature such as money laundering.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway on Sun Aug 17 21:08:02 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Certes <Certes@example.org> wrote:
    On 17/08/2025 21:38, JMB99 wrote:
    On 17/08/2025 19:40, Marland wrote:
    Its bleeding-a obvious that a barbers that only sees about 5 customers
    a day
    canrCOt support the top of the range BMW car that the rCLownerrCY rocks up >>> in to
    see how his hapless-a employee is up to.

    Like many others of them, the one down in town appears to be well
    equipped with the latest equipment.

    Often at least three of the staff outside playing on their mobile phones
    and no customers inside.

    There are comments online that are very similar from all over the UK.

    So they're not doing what was suggested elsewhere in this subthread,
    which is having lots of customers but concealing those who pay cash and
    only paying tax on card-carrying visitors. If there is any wrongdoing,
    which there may well be as you can't buy a BMW on five haircuts a day,
    then it's of some other nature such as money laundering.


    Yes, money laundering is the usual theory, plus potentially employing
    asylum seekers. Ditto with the many hand car washes, with lots of swarthy
    young men working, only one or two of whom speak any English.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sam Wilson@ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk to uk.railway on Mon Aug 18 08:16:14 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :)

    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last
    countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found several >>> places where cards were not accepted. I had taken the precaution of
    getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro
    notes. A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever
    even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.

    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty Ferry. The >> chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash Only Card >> Machine BrokenrCY.

    Sam


    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting cashrCa.

    The chip shop staff were clearly somewhat stressed, but whether that was
    just because they were having to potentially turn custom away or because
    they urgently needed the cash for some nefarious reason is unknowable to
    me.

    Sam
    --
    The entity formerly known as Sam.Wilson@ed.ac.uk
    Spit the dummy to reply
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sam Wilson@ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk to uk.railway on Mon Aug 18 08:21:14 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    ColinR <rail@greystane.shetland.co.uk> wrote:
    On 16/08/2025 16:52, Tweed wrote:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <107q537$1ol5q$1@dont-email.me>, at 14:37:27 on Sat, 16 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 16/08/2025 14:09, Tweed wrote:

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting cashrCa.

    I can believe that. In a restaurant in Germany a couple of weeks ago I >>>>> wanted to pay with my Visa card but their machine said "declined". With >>>>> increasing annoyance and slight embarrassment I then tried another Visa >>>>> card and a Mastercard. My wife tried one of hers. Same result each
    time. I said that our cards had worked elsewhere that same day and
    asked if their machine was faulty. The manager was called and brought >>>>> up another card machine - same results. Fortunately we had just enough >>>>> Euros between us. I am sure they were running some scam, but wasn't >>>>> sure what it was. I certainly didn't add on a tip. Being of a
    suspicious nature, I checked immediately afterwards and none of our
    cards had actually been charged. They might have stolen some details >>>>> but we've had no illicit charges in the days since then. So it remains >>>>> a mystery.

    That could genuinely be the bank that controlled the restaurantrCOs card >>>> machines having a technical bad hair day. Or the restaurantrCOs Internet >>>> connection being down perhaps?

    But why keep offering the machine to more diners, if all the ones
    earlier in the day had been consistently declined?

    Would the machine even say "declined" if it wasn't in contact with the
    merchant services (modulo the whole thing being a skimming operation).

    M&S till card machines showed declined during the start of their ransomware >> attack. I was trying to pay during the first few minutes of the event.


    I had my card declined in the Co-op (before the attack). Luckily had
    enough folding for the bill. Spoke to the manager the next day and he confirmed that they had an internet outage that day.

    Cash is king!!

    IrCOve had that happen twice in Germany. Both times we were taking friends
    out for a meal and they had to pay. One set of friends said theyrCOd come across it before, with some card machines not accepting foreign bank cards
    (we tried 3, including a travel cash card charged with Euros). The friends
    are not technical so they might have misunderstood or have been misled.

    Perhaps our German contributors might comment.

    Sam
    --
    The entity formerly known as Sam.Wilson@ed.ac.uk
    Spit the dummy to reply
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Certes@Certes@example.org to uk.railway on Mon Aug 18 10:53:59 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 18/08/2025 09:16, Sam Wilson wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :)

    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last
    countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found several >>>> places where cards were not accepted. I had taken the precaution of
    getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro
    notes. A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever >>>> even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.

    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty Ferry. The >>> chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash Only Card >>> Machine BrokenrCY.

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting cashrCa.

    The chip shop staff were clearly somewhat stressed, but whether that was
    just because they were having to potentially turn custom away or because
    they urgently needed the cash for some nefarious reason is unknowable to
    me.

    Many places have informal signs stating that cash reduces their handling
    fees, which may or may not be true.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway on Mon Aug 18 10:18:50 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Certes <Certes@example.org> wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 09:16, Sam Wilson wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :)

    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last >>>>> countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found several >>>>> places where cards were not accepted. I had taken the precaution of >>>>> getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro
    notes. A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever >>>>> even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.

    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty Ferry. The
    chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash Only Card >>>> Machine BrokenrCY.

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting cashrCa. >>
    The chip shop staff were clearly somewhat stressed, but whether that was
    just because they were having to potentially turn custom away or because
    they urgently needed the cash for some nefarious reason is unknowable to
    me.

    Many places have informal signs stating that cash reduces their handling fees, which may or may not be true.

    Yes, it may be true, because they do have to lay a fee on their credit card transactions. But handling cash is also not free, and has additional risks.
    So the main benefit of cash to a small business might be tax evasion.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Graeme Wall@rail@greywall.demon.co.uk to uk.railway on Mon Aug 18 11:44:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 18/08/2025 10:53, Certes wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 09:16, Sam Wilson wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :)

    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last >>>>> countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found
    several
    places where cards were not accepted.-a I had taken the precaution of >>>>> getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro
    notes.-a A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever >>>>> even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.

    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty
    Ferry.-a The
    chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash Only >>>> Card
    Machine BrokenrCY.

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting
    cashrCa.

    The chip shop staff were clearly somewhat stressed, but whether that was
    just because they were having to potentially turn custom away or because
    they urgently needed the cash for some nefarious reason is unknowable to
    me.

    Many places have informal signs stating that cash reduces their handling fees, which may or may not be true.


    Except they don't take into account the cost of handling cash.
    --
    Graeme Wall
    This account not read.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sam Wilson@ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk to uk.railway on Mon Aug 18 11:34:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 10:53, Certes wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 09:16, Sam Wilson wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :)

    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last >>>>>> countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found
    several
    places where cards were not accepted.-a I had taken the precaution of >>>>>> getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro >>>>>> notes.-a A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever >>>>>> even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.

    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty
    Ferry.-a The
    chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash Only >>>>> Card
    Machine BrokenrCY.

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting
    cashrCa.

    The chip shop staff were clearly somewhat stressed, but whether that was >>> just because they were having to potentially turn custom away or because >>> they urgently needed the cash for some nefarious reason is unknowable to >>> me.

    Many places have informal signs stating that cash reduces their handling
    fees, which may or may not be true.


    Except they don't take into account the cost of handling cash.

    Which might not be an issue if their outgoings are also in cash rather than
    the cash having to be banked.

    Sam
    --
    The entity formerly known as Sam.Wilson@ed.ac.uk
    Spit the dummy to reply
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From ColinR@rail@greystane.shetland.co.uk to uk.railway on Mon Aug 18 15:21:14 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 18/08/2025 10:53, Certes wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 09:16, Sam Wilson wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :)

    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last >>>>> countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found
    several
    places where cards were not accepted.-a I had taken the precaution of >>>>> getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro
    notes.-a A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever >>>>> even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.

    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty
    Ferry.-a The
    chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash Only >>>> Card
    Machine BrokenrCY.

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting
    cashrCa.

    The chip shop staff were clearly somewhat stressed, but whether that was
    just because they were having to potentially turn custom away or because
    they urgently needed the cash for some nefarious reason is unknowable to
    me.

    Many places have informal signs stating that cash reduces their handling fees, which may or may not be true.


    Hope the link works ..

    https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=pfbid02JoS2FWYFUYV7cLcVdtQ9qKpTej4XFYJEo2TS7kmTW8icLDspzPFqpwa2k4T5gnurl&id=100063781560421
    --
    Colin

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From ColinR@rail@greystane.shetland.co.uk to uk.railway on Mon Aug 18 15:22:40 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 18/08/2025 12:34, Sam Wilson wrote:
    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 10:53, Certes wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 09:16, Sam Wilson wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :) >>>>>>>
    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last >>>>>>> countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found >>>>>>> several
    places where cards were not accepted.-a I had taken the precaution of >>>>>>> getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro >>>>>>> notes.-a A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever >>>>>>> even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.

    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty
    Ferry.-a The
    chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash Only >>>>>> Card
    Machine BrokenrCY.

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting
    cashrCa.

    The chip shop staff were clearly somewhat stressed, but whether that was >>>> just because they were having to potentially turn custom away or because >>>> they urgently needed the cash for some nefarious reason is unknowable to >>>> me.

    Many places have informal signs stating that cash reduces their handling >>> fees, which may or may not be true.


    Except they don't take into account the cost of handling cash.

    Which might not be an issue if their outgoings are also in cash rather than the cash having to be banked.

    Sam


    Or the shop concerned is also a sub-Post Office so banking is just
    walking a couple of paces!
    --
    Colin

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Charles Ellson@charlesellson@btinternet.com to uk.railway on Mon Aug 18 14:55:27 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 21:08:02 GMT, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    Certes <Certes@example.org> wrote:
    On 17/08/2025 21:38, JMB99 wrote:
    On 17/08/2025 19:40, Marland wrote:
    Its bleedinga obvious that a barbers that only sees about 5 customers >>>> a day
    canAt support the top of the range BMW car that the oownero rocks up
    in to
    see how his haplessa employee is up to.

    It might be bleedin' obvious but that won't wash with a court which
    will want evidence. OTOH such places can be a convenient poimt
    to observe the activities of people other than the proprietor while
    waiting patiently for the right time for an official visit. <https://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/news/operation-machinize-hundreds-of-barbershops-targeted-in-nca-coordinated-crackdown?
    [TinyURL currently stuffed]

    Like many others of them, the one down in town appears to be well
    equipped with the latest equipment.

    Often at least three of the staff outside playing on their mobile phones >>> and no customers inside.

    There are comments online that are very similar from all over the UK.

    So they're not doing what was suggested elsewhere in this subthread,
    which is having lots of customers but concealing those who pay cash and
    only paying tax on card-carrying visitors. If there is any wrongdoing,
    which there may well be as you can't buy a BMW on five haircuts a day,
    then it's of some other nature such as money laundering.


    Yes, money laundering is the usual theory, plus potentially employing
    asylum seekers. Ditto with the many hand car washes, with lots of swarthy >young men working, only one or two of whom speak any English.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Charles Ellson@charlesellson@btinternet.com to uk.railway on Mon Aug 18 14:59:55 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 10:18:50 GMT, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    Certes <Certes@example.org> wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 09:16, Sam Wilson wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a u50 note and see what happened :)

    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last >>>>>> countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found several >>>>>> places where cards were not accepted. I had taken the precaution of >>>>>> getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro >>>>>> notes. A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever >>>>>> even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.

    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty Ferry. The
    chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying oCash Only Card >>>>> Machine Brokeno.

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting casha. >>>
    The chip shop staff were clearly somewhat stressed, but whether that was >>> just because they were having to potentially turn custom away or because >>> they urgently needed the cash for some nefarious reason is unknowable to >>> me.

    Many places have informal signs stating that cash reduces their handling
    fees, which may or may not be true.

    Yes, it may be true, because they do have to lay a fee on their credit card >transactions. But handling cash is also not free, and has additional risks. >So the main benefit of cash to a small business might be tax evasion.

    With plastic you will be paying a fee on each transaction; with cash
    you will only be paying a fee on what you have left at the end of the
    day to pay into the bank. There won't be a fee on the cash that you
    hand over to your local wholesaler the next day.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Marland@gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk to uk.railway on Mon Aug 18 21:06:23 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 10:53, Certes wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 09:16, Sam Wilson wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :)

    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last >>>>>> countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found
    several
    places where cards were not accepted.-a I had taken the precaution of >>>>>> getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro >>>>>> notes.-a A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever >>>>>> even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.

    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty
    Ferry.-a The
    chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash Only >>>>> Card
    Machine BrokenrCY.

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting
    cashrCa.

    The chip shop staff were clearly somewhat stressed, but whether that was >>> just because they were having to potentially turn custom away or because >>> they urgently needed the cash for some nefarious reason is unknowable to >>> me.

    Many places have informal signs stating that cash reduces their handling
    fees, which may or may not be true.


    Except they don't take into account the cost of handling cash.

    Yes but a lets say -u20 note that is passed back and forth between several people for goods or services is still a -u20.note at the end of several transactions.
    -u20 passing back and forth via card machines and bank accounts with the the banks and card machine providers taking a cut on each transaction soon gets whittled down to nothing.

    GH
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From nib@news@ingram-bromley.co.uk to uk.railway on Tue Aug 19 09:02:31 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 2025-08-18 22:06, Marland wrote:
    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 10:53, Certes wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 09:16, Sam Wilson wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :) >>>>>>>
    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last >>>>>>> countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found >>>>>>> several
    places where cards were not accepted.-a I had taken the precaution of >>>>>>> getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro >>>>>>> notes.-a A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever >>>>>>> even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.

    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty
    Ferry.-a The
    chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash Only >>>>>> Card
    Machine BrokenrCY.

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting
    cashrCa.

    The chip shop staff were clearly somewhat stressed, but whether that was >>>> just because they were having to potentially turn custom away or because >>>> they urgently needed the cash for some nefarious reason is unknowable to >>>> me.

    Many places have informal signs stating that cash reduces their handling >>> fees, which may or may not be true.


    Except they don't take into account the cost of handling cash.

    Yes but a lets say -u20 note that is passed back and forth between several people for goods or services is still a -u20.note at the end of several transactions.
    -u20 passing back and forth via card machines and bank accounts with the the banks and card machine providers taking a cut on each transaction soon gets whittled down to nothing.

    GH

    But, for example, if you were unlucky or careless enough to get that -u20
    note out of a corner shop cash machine it may have cost you -u23.

    nib
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rolf Mantel@news@hartig-mantel.de to uk.railway on Tue Aug 19 10:33:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Am 18.08.2025 um 23:06 schrieb Marland:
    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 10:53, Certes wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 09:16, Sam Wilson wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :) >>>>>>>
    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last >>>>>>> countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found >>>>>>> several
    places where cards were not accepted.-a I had taken the precaution of >>>>>>> getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro >>>>>>> notes.-a A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever >>>>>>> even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.

    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty
    Ferry.-a The
    chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash Only >>>>>> Card
    Machine BrokenrCY.

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting
    cashrCa.

    The chip shop staff were clearly somewhat stressed, but whether that was >>>> just because they were having to potentially turn custom away or because >>>> they urgently needed the cash for some nefarious reason is unknowable to >>>> me.

    Many places have informal signs stating that cash reduces their handling >>> fees, which may or may not be true.


    Except they don't take into account the cost of handling cash.

    Yes but a lets say -u20 note that is passed back and forth between several people for goods or services is still a -u20.note at the end of several transactions.

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays away
    from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle the
    daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time to
    bring the cah to a bank (in larger businesses he has to hire an armored
    car to transport the cash to the bank).


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway on Tue Aug 19 09:37:17 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> wrote:
    Am 18.08.2025 um 23:06 schrieb Marland:
    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 10:53, Certes wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 09:16, Sam Wilson wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :) >>>>>>>>
    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last >>>>>>>> countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found >>>>>>>> several
    places where cards were not accepted.-a I had taken the precaution of >>>>>>>> getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro >>>>>>>> notes.-a A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever
    even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.

    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty
    Ferry.-a The
    chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash Only >>>>>>> Card
    Machine BrokenrCY.

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting >>>>>> cashrCa.

    The chip shop staff were clearly somewhat stressed, but whether that was >>>>> just because they were having to potentially turn custom away or because >>>>> they urgently needed the cash for some nefarious reason is unknowable to >>>>> me.

    Many places have informal signs stating that cash reduces their handling >>>> fees, which may or may not be true.


    Except they don't take into account the cost of handling cash.

    Yes but a lets say -u20 note that is passed back and forth between several >> people for goods or services is still a -u20.note at the end of several
    transactions.

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays away
    from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle the daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time to
    bring the cah to a bank (in larger businesses he has to hire an armored
    car to transport the cash to the bank).

    Plus banks charge businesses to deposit cash. And thererCOs the risk of it being stolen (petty pilfering by staff, or organised robbers), which might
    need to be covered by extra insurance if the amounts are large. There might also need to be a substantial safe, or secure room. ThererCOs also the risk
    of accepting counterfeit notes or coins.

    https://www.lloydsbank.com/business/commercial-banking/rates-and-charges.html

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JMB99@mb@nospam.net to uk.railway on Tue Aug 19 11:36:37 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 19/08/2025 10:37, Recliner wrote:
    ThererCOs also the risk
    of accepting counterfeit notes or coins.



    And of course. if you find a counterfeit note there is no point in
    reporting it as it will not be replaced. So people just keep quiet and
    hope not noticed.





    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ulf Kutzner@user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid to uk.railway on Tue Aug 19 10:43:13 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway


    JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> posted:

    On 19/08/2025 10:37, Recliner wrote:
    ThererCOs also the risk
    of accepting counterfeit notes or coins.



    And of course. if you find a counterfeit note there is no point in
    reporting it as it will not be replaced. So people just keep quiet and
    hope not noticed.

    And won't be brought to court by the Crown?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From ColinR@rail@greystane.shetland.co.uk to uk.railway on Tue Aug 19 12:26:36 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 19/08/2025 10:37, Recliner wrote:
    Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> wrote:
    Am 18.08.2025 um 23:06 schrieb Marland:
    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 10:53, Certes wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 09:16, Sam Wilson wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :) >>>>>>>>>
    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last >>>>>>>>> countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found >>>>>>>>> several
    places where cards were not accepted.-a I had taken the precaution of >>>>>>>>> getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro >>>>>>>>> notes.-a A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever
    even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum. >>>>>>>>
    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty >>>>>>>> Ferry.-a The
    chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash Only >>>>>>>> Card
    Machine BrokenrCY.

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting >>>>>>> cashrCa.

    The chip shop staff were clearly somewhat stressed, but whether that was >>>>>> just because they were having to potentially turn custom away or because >>>>>> they urgently needed the cash for some nefarious reason is unknowable to >>>>>> me.

    Many places have informal signs stating that cash reduces their handling >>>>> fees, which may or may not be true.


    Except they don't take into account the cost of handling cash.

    Yes but a lets say -u20 note that is passed back and forth between several >>> people for goods or services is still a -u20.note at the end of several >>> transactions.

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays away
    from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle the
    daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time to
    bring the cah to a bank (in larger businesses he has to hire an armored
    car to transport the cash to the bank).

    Plus banks charge businesses to deposit cash. And thererCOs the risk of it being stolen (petty pilfering by staff, or organised robbers), which might need to be covered by extra insurance if the amounts are large. There might also need to be a substantial safe, or secure room. ThererCOs also the risk of accepting counterfeit notes or coins.

    https://www.lloydsbank.com/business/commercial-banking/rates-and-charges.html



    And of course card machines are 100% secure all the time - or maybe not.
    Risks both ways, but with cash you can see the result, with electrons
    whizzing about you cannot see a problem until it is too late!
    --
    Colin

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Certes@Certes@example.org to uk.railway on Tue Aug 19 12:31:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 19/08/2025 12:26, ColinR wrote:
    On 19/08/2025 10:37, Recliner wrote:
    Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> wrote:
    Am 18.08.2025 um 23:06 schrieb Marland:
    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 10:53, Certes wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 09:16, Sam Wilson wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :) >>>>>>>>>>
    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of >>>>>>>>>> the last
    countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found >>>>>>>>>> several
    places where cards were not accepted.-a I had taken the
    precaution of
    getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 >>>>>>>>>> Euro
    notes.-a A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem >>>>>>>>>> whatever
    even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum. >>>>>>>>>
    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty >>>>>>>>> Ferry.-a The
    chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash >>>>>>>>> Only
    Card
    Machine BrokenrCY.

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting >>>>>>>> cashrCa.

    The chip shop staff were clearly somewhat stressed, but whether >>>>>>> that was
    just because they were having to potentially turn custom away or >>>>>>> because
    they urgently needed the cash for some nefarious reason is
    unknowable to
    me.

    Many places have informal signs stating that cash reduces their
    handling
    fees, which may or may not be true.


    Except they don't take into account the cost of handling cash.

    Yes but a lets say -u20 note that is passed-a back and forth between
    several
    people for goods or services-a is still a -u20.note at the end of several >>>> transactions.

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays away
    from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle the
    daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time to
    bring the cah to a bank (in larger businesses he has to hire an armored
    car to transport the cash to the bank).

    Plus banks charge businesses to deposit cash. And thererCOs the risk of it >> being stolen (petty pilfering by staff, or organised robbers), which
    might
    need to be covered by extra insurance if the amounts are large. There
    might
    also need to be a substantial safe, or secure room. ThererCOs also the risk >> of accepting counterfeit notes or coins.

    https://www.lloydsbank.com/business/commercial-banking/rates-and-charges.html

    And of course card machines are 100% secure all the time - or maybe not. Risks both ways, but with cash you can see the result, with electrons whizzing about you cannot see a problem until it is too late!

    I'm not sure card machines defraud the retailer, unless they have chosen
    to accept a card which the machine was unable to verify.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway on Tue Aug 19 14:11:06 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 12:26:36 +0100, ColinR <rail@greystane.shetland.co.uk> wrote:

    On 19/08/2025 10:37, Recliner wrote:
    Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> wrote:
    Am 18.08.2025 um 23:06 schrieb Marland:
    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 10:53, Certes wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 09:16, Sam Wilson wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :) >>>>>>>>>>
    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last
    countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found >>>>>>>>>> several
    places where cards were not accepted.-a I had taken the precaution of
    getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro >>>>>>>>>> notes.-a A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever
    even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum. >>>>>>>>>
    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty >>>>>>>>> Ferry.-a The
    chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash Only >>>>>>>>> Card
    Machine BrokenrCY.

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting >>>>>>>> cashrCa.

    The chip shop staff were clearly somewhat stressed, but whether that was
    just because they were having to potentially turn custom away or because
    they urgently needed the cash for some nefarious reason is unknowable to
    me.

    Many places have informal signs stating that cash reduces their handling >>>>>> fees, which may or may not be true.


    Except they don't take into account the cost of handling cash.

    Yes but a lets say -u20 note that is passed back and forth between several
    people for goods or services is still a -u20.note at the end of several >>>> transactions.

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays away
    from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle the
    daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time to
    bring the cah to a bank (in larger businesses he has to hire an armored
    car to transport the cash to the bank).

    Plus banks charge businesses to deposit cash. And thererCOs the risk of it >> being stolen (petty pilfering by staff, or organised robbers), which might >> need to be covered by extra insurance if the amounts are large. There might >> also need to be a substantial safe, or secure room. ThererCOs also the risk >> of accepting counterfeit notes or coins.

    https://www.lloydsbank.com/business/commercial-banking/rates-and-charges.html



    And of course card machines are 100% secure all the time - or maybe not. >Risks both ways, but with cash you can see the result, with electrons >whizzing about you cannot see a problem until it is too late!

    You probably wouldn't spot a counterfeit note till tool late, or discover that staff are undercharging their friends or
    simply not putting all the cash in the till.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Marland@gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk to uk.railway on Tue Aug 19 14:33:50 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    nib <news@ingram-bromley.co.uk> wrote:
    On 2025-08-18 22:06, Marland wrote:
    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 10:53, Certes wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 09:16, Sam Wilson wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :) >>>>>>>>
    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last >>>>>>>> countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found >>>>>>>> several
    places where cards were not accepted.-a I had taken the precaution of >>>>>>>> getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro >>>>>>>> notes.-a A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever
    even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum.

    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty
    Ferry.-a The
    chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash Only >>>>>>> Card
    Machine BrokenrCY.

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting >>>>>> cashrCa.

    The chip shop staff were clearly somewhat stressed, but whether that was >>>>> just because they were having to potentially turn custom away or because >>>>> they urgently needed the cash for some nefarious reason is unknowable to >>>>> me.

    Many places have informal signs stating that cash reduces their handling >>>> fees, which may or may not be true.


    Except they don't take into account the cost of handling cash.

    Yes but a lets say -u20 note that is passed back and forth between several >> people for goods or services is still a -u20.note at the end of several
    transactions.
    -u20 passing back and forth via card machines and bank accounts with the the >> banks and card machine providers taking a cut on each transaction soon gets >> whittled down to nothing.

    GH

    But, for example, if you were unlucky or careless enough to get that -u20 note out of a corner shop cash machine it may have cost you -u23.

    nib


    Not compulsory to use to use one of those though it is getting harder to
    find the normal ones , some places like my local filling station still give cash back so that is another source of cash for some.
    Many Post offices are useful as well as they supply cash for no charge to
    the customer against most bank charge cards. Mildly amused on another newsgroup recently when a contributor was trying to source some cash in a
    local supermarket and used one of those machines that add a charge,
    knowing who he is and what supermarket they were using I asked why he
    didnrCOt just use the Post Office Counter within, turned out another reason
    he was there was to post a parcel but wasnrCOt aware of the cash service despite it being on the signs listing what services they do.

    GH
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From ColinR@rail@greystane.shetland.co.uk to uk.railway on Tue Aug 19 15:53:07 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 19/08/2025 12:31, Certes wrote:
    On 19/08/2025 12:26, ColinR wrote:
    On 19/08/2025 10:37, Recliner wrote:
    Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> wrote:
    Am 18.08.2025 um 23:06 schrieb Marland:
    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 10:53, Certes wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 09:16, Sam Wilson wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :) >>>>>>>>>>>
    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of >>>>>>>>>>> the last
    countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found >>>>>>>>>>> several
    places where cards were not accepted.-a I had taken the >>>>>>>>>>> precaution of
    getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as >>>>>>>>>>> 50 Euro
    notes.-a A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem >>>>>>>>>>> whatever
    even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum. >>>>>>>>>>
    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty >>>>>>>>>> Ferry.-a The
    chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash >>>>>>>>>> Only
    Card
    Machine BrokenrCY.

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting >>>>>>>>> cashrCa.

    The chip shop staff were clearly somewhat stressed, but whether >>>>>>>> that was
    just because they were having to potentially turn custom away or >>>>>>>> because
    they urgently needed the cash for some nefarious reason is
    unknowable to
    me.

    Many places have informal signs stating that cash reduces their >>>>>>> handling
    fees, which may or may not be true.


    Except they don't take into account the cost of handling cash.

    Yes but a lets say -u20 note that is passed-a back and forth between >>>>> several
    people for goods or services-a is still a -u20.note at the end of
    several
    transactions.

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays away
    from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle the >>>> daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time to
    bring the cah to a bank (in larger businesses he has to hire an armored >>>> car to transport the cash to the bank).

    Plus banks charge businesses to deposit cash. And thererCOs the risk of it >>> being stolen (petty pilfering by staff, or organised robbers), which
    might
    need to be covered by extra insurance if the amounts are large. There
    might
    also need to be a substantial safe, or secure room. ThererCOs also the
    risk
    of accepting counterfeit notes or coins.

    https://www.lloydsbank.com/business/commercial-banking/rates-and-
    charges.html

    And of course card machines are 100% secure all the time - or maybe
    not. Risks both ways, but with cash you can see the result, with
    electrons whizzing about you cannot see a problem until it is too late!

    I'm not sure card machines defraud the retailer, unless they have chosen
    to accept a card which the machine was unable to verify.


    Not the retailer, the customer!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Marland@gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk to uk.railway on Tue Aug 19 14:55:03 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
    Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> wrote:
    Am 18.08.2025 um 23:06 schrieb Marland:
    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 10:53, Certes wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 09:16, Sam Wilson wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :) >>>>>>>>>
    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of the last >>>>>>>>> countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found >>>>>>>>> several
    places where cards were not accepted.-a I had taken the precaution of >>>>>>>>> getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as 50 Euro >>>>>>>>> notes.-a A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem whatever
    even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum. >>>>>>>>
    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty >>>>>>>> Ferry.-a The
    chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash Only >>>>>>>> Card
    Machine BrokenrCY.

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting >>>>>>> cashrCa.

    The chip shop staff were clearly somewhat stressed, but whether that was >>>>>> just because they were having to potentially turn custom away or because >>>>>> they urgently needed the cash for some nefarious reason is unknowable to >>>>>> me.

    Many places have informal signs stating that cash reduces their handling >>>>> fees, which may or may not be true.


    Except they don't take into account the cost of handling cash.

    Yes but a lets say -u20 note that is passed back and forth between several >>> people for goods or services is still a -u20.note at the end of several >>> transactions.

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays away
    from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle the
    daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time to
    bring the cah to a bank (in larger businesses he has to hire an armored
    car to transport the cash to the bank).

    Plus banks charge businesses to deposit cash. And thererCOs the risk of it being stolen (petty pilfering by staff, or organised robbers), which might need to be covered by extra insurance if the amounts are large. There might also need to be a substantial safe, or secure room. ThererCOs also the risk of accepting counterfeit notes or coins.

    https://www.lloydsbank.com/business/commercial-banking/rates-and-charges.html



    Obviously there is a balance to be had and for businesses to decide what
    suits them.
    Last week in a small town near here one of the fibre only Telcos managed
    while installing their infrastructure to sever an open reach line that
    killed broadband for 24 hours for much of the town and. surrounding areas
    up to 10 miles away including here. Many businesses just could trade as
    their terminals would not work. Fortunately I had some cash on me , didnrCOt actually need it myself but it let a neighbour get enough fuel in their car
    so they could get to work.
    All those phones that have been converted to digital stopped as well and
    with poor signal from all networks some people were really stuffed.
    Fortunately the Village Hall is on one of the new fibre companies and quite
    a few residents know the WIFI code so before long there was a little gaggle
    of people doing their essential communications in the grounds.

    GH
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway on Tue Aug 19 19:04:48 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    ColinR <rail@greystane.shetland.co.uk> wrote:
    On 19/08/2025 12:31, Certes wrote:
    On 19/08/2025 12:26, ColinR wrote:
    On 19/08/2025 10:37, Recliner wrote:
    Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> wrote:
    Am 18.08.2025 um 23:06 schrieb Marland:
    Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 10:53, Certes wrote:
    On 18/08/2025 09:16, Sam Wilson wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
    Clive Page <usenet@page2.eu> wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:56, Roland Perry wrote:
    I'd be tempted to give them a -u50 note and see what happened :) >>>>>>>>>>>>
    Indeed you should.

    In recent trips to Germany, which in my experience is one of >>>>>>>>>>>> the last
    countries in Europe where cash still plays a major role, I found >>>>>>>>>>>> several
    places where cards were not accepted.-a I had taken the >>>>>>>>>>>> precaution of
    getting plenty of Euros from a ATM but these were mostly as >>>>>>>>>>>> 50 Euro
    notes.-a A 50 Euro note was changed every time with no problem >>>>>>>>>>>> whatever
    even for just an ice-cream, bus ticket, or entry to a museum. >>>>>>>>>>>
    Just over a week ago I paid cash for fish and chips in Broughty >>>>>>>>>>> Ferry.-a The
    chip shop had a handwritten sign (on a paper bag) saying rCLCash >>>>>>>>>>> Only
    Card
    Machine BrokenrCY.

    Card machine broken is rarely the true reason why they are wanting >>>>>>>>>> cashrCa.

    The chip shop staff were clearly somewhat stressed, but whether >>>>>>>>> that was
    just because they were having to potentially turn custom away or >>>>>>>>> because
    they urgently needed the cash for some nefarious reason is
    unknowable to
    me.

    Many places have informal signs stating that cash reduces their >>>>>>>> handling
    fees, which may or may not be true.


    Except they don't take into account the cost of handling cash.

    Yes but a lets say -u20 note that is passed-a back and forth between >>>>>> several
    people for goods or services-a is still a -u20.note at the end of >>>>>> several
    transactions.

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays away >>>>> from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle the >>>>> daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time to >>>>> bring the cah to a bank (in larger businesses he has to hire an armored >>>>> car to transport the cash to the bank).

    Plus banks charge businesses to deposit cash. And thererCOs the risk of it >>>> being stolen (petty pilfering by staff, or organised robbers), which
    might
    need to be covered by extra insurance if the amounts are large. There >>>> might
    also need to be a substantial safe, or secure room. ThererCOs also the >>>> risk
    of accepting counterfeit notes or coins.

    https://www.lloydsbank.com/business/commercial-banking/rates-and-
    charges.html

    And of course card machines are 100% secure all the time - or maybe
    not. Risks both ways, but with cash you can see the result, with
    electrons whizzing about you cannot see a problem until it is too late!

    I'm not sure card machines defraud the retailer, unless they have chosen
    to accept a card which the machine was unable to verify.


    Not the retailer, the customer!


    I donrCOt recall ever being defrauded by machines. ItrCOs doubly secure if you use your phone rather than a physical card.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Wed Aug 20 08:39:06 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <1081cth$3kktk$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:33:53 on Tue, 19 Aug
    2025, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> remarked:

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays away
    from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle the >daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time to
    bring the cah to a bank

    Only if the bank is a long distance away. It might be next door.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ulf Kutzner@user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid to uk.railway on Wed Aug 20 07:47:35 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway


    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> posted:

    In message <1081cth$3kktk$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:33:53 on Tue, 19 Aug
    2025, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> remarked:

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays away
    from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle the >daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time to
    bring the cah to a bank

    Only if the bank is a long distance away. It might be next door.

    But it might leave from there.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From ColinR@rail@greystane.shetland.co.uk to uk.railway on Wed Aug 20 10:53:22 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 20/08/2025 08:47, Ulf Kutzner wrote:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> posted:

    In message <1081cth$3kktk$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:33:53 on Tue, 19 Aug
    2025, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> remarked:

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays away
    from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle the
    daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time to
    bring the cah to a bank

    Only if the bank is a long distance away. It might be next door.

    But it might leave from there.

    ???

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ulf Kutzner@user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid to uk.railway on Wed Aug 20 10:06:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway


    ColinR <rail@greystane.shetland.co.uk> posted:

    On 20/08/2025 08:47, Ulf Kutzner wrote:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> posted:

    In message <1081cth$3kktk$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:33:53 on Tue, 19 Aug
    2025, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> remarked:

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays away
    from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle the >>> daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time to
    bring the cah to a bank

    Only if the bank is a long distance away. It might be next door.

    But it might leave from there.

    ???

    Banks may close, at least their minor branches.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From ColinR@rail@greystane.shetland.co.uk to uk.railway on Wed Aug 20 12:25:16 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 20/08/2025 11:06, Ulf Kutzner wrote:

    ColinR <rail@greystane.shetland.co.uk> posted:

    On 20/08/2025 08:47, Ulf Kutzner wrote:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> posted:

    In message <1081cth$3kktk$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:33:53 on Tue, 19 Aug >>>> 2025, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> remarked:

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays away >>>> >from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle the >>>>> daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time to >>>>> bring the cah to a bank

    Only if the bank is a long distance away. It might be next door.

    But it might leave from there.

    ???

    Banks may close, at least their minor branches.

    True in the long term, but that does not alter Roland's comment "it
    might be next door"
    --
    Colin

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Graeme Wall@rail@greywall.demon.co.uk to uk.railway on Wed Aug 20 16:33:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 20/08/2025 08:39, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <1081cth$3kktk$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:33:53 on Tue, 19 Aug
    2025, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> remarked:

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays away
    from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle
    the daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time
    to bring the cah to a bank

    Only if the bank is a long distance away. It might be next door.


    Less and less likely with bank branches closing at an increasing rate.
    --
    Graeme Wall
    This account not read.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Thu Aug 21 07:59:57 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <1084psd$dgd9$1@dont-email.me>, at 16:33:33 on Wed, 20 Aug
    2025, Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> remarked:
    On 20/08/2025 08:39, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <1081cth$3kktk$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:33:53 on Tue, 19
    Aug 2025, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> remarked:

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays
    away from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle
    the daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time
    to bring the cah to a bank
    Only if the bank is a long distance away. It might be next door.

    Less and less likely with bank branches closing at an increasing rate.

    Most of the rural ones are already shut, and closing the last remaining
    bank in a town is likely to meet with opposition. So what's happening is
    towns with five branches of different banks might become four branches.
    I also understand that Nationwide (although not strictly a bank) isn't
    closing many, indeed has a policy not to close any before 2028. [Up
    until July 2022 it was closing about one a month, from its chain of 600]
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ulf Kutzner@user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid to uk.railway on Thu Aug 21 09:23:47 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway


    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> posted:

    In message <1084psd$dgd9$1@dont-email.me>, at 16:33:33 on Wed, 20 Aug
    2025, Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> remarked:
    On 20/08/2025 08:39, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <1081cth$3kktk$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:33:53 on Tue, 19
    Aug 2025, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> remarked:

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays
    away from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle >>>the daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time >>>to bring the cah to a bank
    Only if the bank is a long distance away. It might be next door.

    Less and less likely with bank branches closing at an increasing rate.

    Most of the rural ones are already shut, and closing the last remaining
    bank in a town is likely to meet with opposition. So what's happening is towns with five branches of different banks might become four branches.

    And with six branches of a given bank might become two.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Thu Aug 21 11:11:44 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <1755768227-2991@newsgrouper.org>, at 09:23:47 on Thu, 21 Aug
    2025, Ulf Kutzner <user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid> remarked:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> posted:

    In message <1084psd$dgd9$1@dont-email.me>, at 16:33:33 on Wed, 20 Aug
    2025, Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> remarked:
    On 20/08/2025 08:39, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <1081cth$3kktk$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:33:53 on Tue, 19
    Aug 2025, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> remarked:

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays
    away from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle
    the daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time
    to bring the cah to a bank
    Only if the bank is a long distance away. It might be next door.

    Less and less likely with bank branches closing at an increasing rate.

    Most of the rural ones are already shut, and closing the last remaining
    bank in a town is likely to meet with opposition. So what's happening is
    towns with five branches of different banks might become four branches.

    And with six branches of a given bank might become two.

    Not sure there are many towns at all with six branches of the same bank.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ulf Kutzner@user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid to uk.railway on Thu Aug 21 10:22:02 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway


    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> posted:

    In message <1755768227-2991@newsgrouper.org>, at 09:23:47 on Thu, 21 Aug 2025, Ulf Kutzner <user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid> remarked:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> posted:

    In message <1084psd$dgd9$1@dont-email.me>, at 16:33:33 on Wed, 20 Aug
    2025, Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> remarked:
    On 20/08/2025 08:39, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <1081cth$3kktk$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:33:53 on Tue, 19
    Aug 2025, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> remarked:

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays
    away from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle
    the daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time >> >>>to bring the cah to a bank
    Only if the bank is a long distance away. It might be next door.

    Less and less likely with bank branches closing at an increasing rate.

    Most of the rural ones are already shut, and closing the last remaining
    bank in a town is likely to meet with opposition. So what's happening is >> towns with five branches of different banks might become four branches.

    And with six branches of a given bank might become two.

    Not sure there are many towns at all with six branches of the same bank.

    I believe it was not rare for savings banks here [TM].
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Thu Aug 21 11:28:05 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <1755771722-2991@newsgrouper.org>, at 10:22:02 on Thu, 21 Aug
    2025, Ulf Kutzner <user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid> remarked:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> posted:

    In message <1755768227-2991@newsgrouper.org>, at 09:23:47 on Thu, 21 Aug
    2025, Ulf Kutzner <user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid> remarked:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> posted:

    In message <1084psd$dgd9$1@dont-email.me>, at 16:33:33 on Wed, 20 Aug
    2025, Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> remarked:
    On 20/08/2025 08:39, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <1081cth$3kktk$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:33:53 on Tue, 19
    Aug 2025, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> remarked:

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays
    away from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle >> >> >>>the daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time >> >> >>>to bring the cah to a bank
    Only if the bank is a long distance away. It might be next door.

    Less and less likely with bank branches closing at an increasing rate. >> >>
    Most of the rural ones are already shut, and closing the last remaining >> >> bank in a town is likely to meet with opposition. So what's happening is >> >> towns with five branches of different banks might become four branches. >> >
    And with six branches of a given bank might become two.

    Not sure there are many towns at all with six branches of the same bank.

    I believe it was not rare for savings banks here [TM].

    "Was not", when? The 19th Century?
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ulf Kutzner@user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid to uk.railway on Thu Aug 21 10:56:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway


    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> posted:

    In message <1755771722-2991@newsgrouper.org>, at 10:22:02 on Thu, 21 Aug 2025, Ulf Kutzner <user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid> remarked:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> posted:

    In message <1755768227-2991@newsgrouper.org>, at 09:23:47 on Thu, 21 Aug >> 2025, Ulf Kutzner <user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid> remarked:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> posted:

    In message <1084psd$dgd9$1@dont-email.me>, at 16:33:33 on Wed, 20 Aug >> >> 2025, Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> remarked:
    On 20/08/2025 08:39, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <1081cth$3kktk$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:33:53 on Tue, 19 >> >> >>Aug 2025, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> remarked:

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays
    away from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle >> >> >>>the daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time
    to bring the cah to a bank
    Only if the bank is a long distance away. It might be next door.

    Less and less likely with bank branches closing at an increasing rate. >> >>
    Most of the rural ones are already shut, and closing the last remaining >> >> bank in a town is likely to meet with opposition. So what's happening is
    towns with five branches of different banks might become four branches. >> >
    And with six branches of a given bank might become two.

    Not sure there are many towns at all with six branches of the same bank.

    I believe it was not rare for savings banks here [TM].

    "Was not", when? The 19th Century?

    I struggle to tell the number of branches
    but I know that at least two of them (must
    be more) were closed during the last ten years.

    Their website wouldn't tell how many branches
    they run during their best times...

    Maybe long-time customers have old paperwork
    with all btranches included.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ulf Kutzner@user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid to uk.railway on Thu Aug 21 11:00:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway


    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> posted:

    In message <1755771722-2991@newsgrouper.org>, at 10:22:02 on Thu, 21 Aug 2025, Ulf Kutzner <user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid> remarked:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> posted:

    In message <1755768227-2991@newsgrouper.org>, at 09:23:47 on Thu, 21 Aug >> 2025, Ulf Kutzner <user2991@newsgrouper.org.invalid> remarked:

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> posted:

    In message <1084psd$dgd9$1@dont-email.me>, at 16:33:33 on Wed, 20 Aug >> >> 2025, Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> remarked:
    On 20/08/2025 08:39, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <1081cth$3kktk$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:33:53 on Tue, 19 >> >> >>Aug 2025, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> remarked:

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays
    away from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle >> >> >>>the daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time
    to bring the cah to a bank
    Only if the bank is a long distance away. It might be next door.

    Less and less likely with bank branches closing at an increasing rate. >> >>
    Most of the rural ones are already shut, and closing the last remaining >> >> bank in a town is likely to meet with opposition. So what's happening is
    towns with five branches of different banks might become four branches. >> >
    And with six branches of a given bank might become two.

    Not sure there are many towns at all with six branches of the same bank.

    I believe it was not rare for savings banks here [TM].

    "Was not", when? The 19th Century?

    Hm, this is for G||ttingen county without G||ttingen City,
    2023:

    5 branches, 16 self-service points to be closed in that very year.

    https://www.tagesschau.de/investigativ/report-mainz/sparkassen-113.html

    Will tell more when I find numbers for a city.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.railway on Thu Aug 21 11:11:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <1084psd$dgd9$1@dont-email.me>, at 16:33:33 on Wed, 20 Aug
    2025, Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> remarked:
    On 20/08/2025 08:39, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <1081cth$3kktk$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:33:53 on Tue, 19
    Aug 2025, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> remarked:

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays
    away from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle
    the daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time >>>> to bring the cah to a bank
    Only if the bank is a long distance away. It might be next door.

    Less and less likely with bank branches closing at an increasing rate.

    Most of the rural ones are already shut, and closing the last remaining
    bank in a town is likely to meet with opposition. So what's happening is towns with five branches of different banks might become four branches.
    I also understand that Nationwide (although not strictly a bank) isn't closing many, indeed has a policy not to close any before 2028. [Up
    until July 2022 it was closing about one a month, from its chain of 600]

    It might meet with opposition, but they are now leaving some towns without
    any bank at all. Market Harborough (population 25k) has lost all of its
    bank branches. It still has a Nationwide, but as has been said, it is not really a bank.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Thu Aug 21 12:32:21 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <1086utp$tbls$1@dont-email.me>, at 11:11:53 on Thu, 21 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <1084psd$dgd9$1@dont-email.me>, at 16:33:33 on Wed, 20 Aug
    2025, Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> remarked:
    On 20/08/2025 08:39, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <1081cth$3kktk$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:33:53 on Tue, 19
    Aug 2025, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> remarked:

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays
    away from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle
    the daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time >>>>> to bring the cah to a bank
    Only if the bank is a long distance away. It might be next door.

    Less and less likely with bank branches closing at an increasing rate.

    Most of the rural ones are already shut, and closing the last remaining
    bank in a town is likely to meet with opposition. So what's happening is
    towns with five branches of different banks might become four branches.
    I also understand that Nationwide (although not strictly a bank) isn't
    closing many, indeed has a policy not to close any before 2028. [Up
    until July 2022 it was closing about one a month, from its chain of 600]

    It might meet with opposition, but they are now leaving some towns without >any bank at all. Market Harborough (population 25k) has lost all of its
    bank branches. It still has a Nationwide, but as has been said, it is not >really a bank.

    But it does allow people to pay in cash - which is the thing under
    discussion.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.railway on Thu Aug 21 11:57:27 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <1086utp$tbls$1@dont-email.me>, at 11:11:53 on Thu, 21 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <1084psd$dgd9$1@dont-email.me>, at 16:33:33 on Wed, 20 Aug
    2025, Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> remarked:
    On 20/08/2025 08:39, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <1081cth$3kktk$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:33:53 on Tue, 19
    Aug 2025, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> remarked:

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays
    away from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle >>>>>> the daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time >>>>>> to bring the cah to a bank
    Only if the bank is a long distance away. It might be next door.

    Less and less likely with bank branches closing at an increasing rate.

    Most of the rural ones are already shut, and closing the last remaining
    bank in a town is likely to meet with opposition. So what's happening is >>> towns with five branches of different banks might become four branches.
    I also understand that Nationwide (although not strictly a bank) isn't
    closing many, indeed has a policy not to close any before 2028. [Up
    until July 2022 it was closing about one a month, from its chain of 600]

    It might meet with opposition, but they are now leaving some towns without >> any bank at all. Market Harborough (population 25k) has lost all of its
    bank branches. It still has a Nationwide, but as has been said, it is not
    really a bank.

    But it does allow people to pay in cash - which is the thing under discussion.

    In a very limited fashion. ThererCOs limits on the amount of banknotes they will accept and
    rCLWe do not accept any coins from businesses or traderCY

    Perhaps this might change soon. One of their reasons for buying Virgin
    Money was to expand into business banking.

    Just as an example of how they arenrCOt really a bank, I went into my Nationwide branch (Lloyds shuts on a Friday now) to ask for ten one pound
    coins (my emergency reserve kept in the car for parking machines that wonrCOt work in any other fashion, eg my local hospital). There was much sucking through of teeth as I offered a ten pound note.
    Are you a customer sir?
    Yes
    IrCOll just have to go round the back to see if we have that many coins.
    On return
    Yes we have the coins. But first you have to pay that note into your
    account and then I can withdraw it as these coins.

    So not really set up for cash handling even for non business users.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JMB99@mb@nospam.net to uk.railway on Thu Aug 21 15:09:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 21/08/2025 12:57, Tweed wrote:
    In a very limited fashion. ThererCOs limits on the amount of banknotes they will accept and
    rCLWe do not accept any coins from businesses or traderCY

    Perhaps this might change soon. One of their reasons for buying Virgin
    Money was to expand into business banking.

    Just as an example of how they arenrCOt really a bank, I went into my Nationwide branch (Lloyds shuts on a Friday now) to ask for ten one pound coins (my emergency reserve kept in the car for parking machines that wonrCOt work in any other fashion, eg my local hospital). There was much sucking through of teeth as I offered a ten pound note.
    Are you a customer sir?
    Yes
    IrCOll just have to go round the back to see if we have that many coins.
    On return
    Yes we have the coins. But first you have to pay that note into your
    account and then I can withdraw it as these coins.

    So not really set up for cash handling even for non business users.



    I have stocked up with pound coins several time. Not had any problem
    but they have always asked if I was a customer and I showed them my
    cheque book.

    I have usually stopped first at their cash machine and drawn out some
    readies.

    Not been complicated by my account being at a bank branch several
    hundred miles away and an 'English' bank though same group as the local 'Scottish' bank.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tweed@usenet.tweed@gmail.com to uk.railway on Thu Aug 21 17:37:03 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> wrote:
    On 21/08/2025 12:57, Tweed wrote:
    In a very limited fashion. ThererCOs limits on the amount of banknotes they >> will accept and
    rCLWe do not accept any coins from businesses or traderCY

    Perhaps this might change soon. One of their reasons for buying Virgin
    Money was to expand into business banking.

    Just as an example of how they arenrCOt really a bank, I went into my
    Nationwide branch (Lloyds shuts on a Friday now) to ask for ten one pound
    coins (my emergency reserve kept in the car for parking machines that wonrCOt
    work in any other fashion, eg my local hospital). There was much sucking
    through of teeth as I offered a ten pound note.
    Are you a customer sir?
    Yes
    IrCOll just have to go round the back to see if we have that many coins.
    On return
    Yes we have the coins. But first you have to pay that note into your
    account and then I can withdraw it as these coins.

    So not really set up for cash handling even for non business users.



    I have stocked up with pound coins several time. Not had any problem
    but they have always asked if I was a customer and I showed them my
    cheque book.

    I have usually stopped first at their cash machine and drawn out some readies.

    Not been complicated by my account being at a bank branch several
    hundred miles away and an 'English' bank though same group as the local 'Scottish' bank.

    Are you talking about Nationwide?

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Recliner@recliner.usenet@gmail.com to uk.railway on Thu Aug 21 18:55:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> wrote:
    On 21/08/2025 12:57, Tweed wrote:
    In a very limited fashion. ThererCOs limits on the amount of banknotes they >>> will accept and
    rCLWe do not accept any coins from businesses or traderCY

    Perhaps this might change soon. One of their reasons for buying Virgin
    Money was to expand into business banking.

    Just as an example of how they arenrCOt really a bank, I went into my
    Nationwide branch (Lloyds shuts on a Friday now) to ask for ten one pound >>> coins (my emergency reserve kept in the car for parking machines that wonrCOt
    work in any other fashion, eg my local hospital). There was much sucking >>> through of teeth as I offered a ten pound note.
    Are you a customer sir?
    Yes
    IrCOll just have to go round the back to see if we have that many coins. >>> On return
    Yes we have the coins. But first you have to pay that note into your
    account and then I can withdraw it as these coins.

    So not really set up for cash handling even for non business users.



    I have stocked up with pound coins several time. Not had any problem
    but they have always asked if I was a customer and I showed them my
    cheque book.

    I have usually stopped first at their cash machine and drawn out some
    readies.

    Not been complicated by my account being at a bank branch several
    hundred miles away and an 'English' bank though same group as the local
    'Scottish' bank.

    Are you talking about Nationwide?

    NatWest, surely?

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From ColinR@rail@greystane.shetland.co.uk to uk.railway on Thu Aug 21 20:45:46 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 21/08/2025 19:55, Recliner wrote:
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> wrote:
    On 21/08/2025 12:57, Tweed wrote:
    In a very limited fashion. ThererCOs limits on the amount of banknotes they
    will accept and
    rCLWe do not accept any coins from businesses or traderCY

    Perhaps this might change soon. One of their reasons for buying Virgin >>>> Money was to expand into business banking.

    Just as an example of how they arenrCOt really a bank, I went into my
    Nationwide branch (Lloyds shuts on a Friday now) to ask for ten one pound >>>> coins (my emergency reserve kept in the car for parking machines that wonrCOt
    work in any other fashion, eg my local hospital). There was much sucking >>>> through of teeth as I offered a ten pound note.
    Are you a customer sir?
    Yes
    IrCOll just have to go round the back to see if we have that many coins. >>>> On return
    Yes we have the coins. But first you have to pay that note into your
    account and then I can withdraw it as these coins.

    So not really set up for cash handling even for non business users.



    I have stocked up with pound coins several time. Not had any problem
    but they have always asked if I was a customer and I showed them my
    cheque book.

    I have usually stopped first at their cash machine and drawn out some
    readies.

    Not been complicated by my account being at a bank branch several
    hundred miles away and an 'English' bank though same group as the local
    'Scottish' bank.

    Are you talking about Nationwide?

    NatWest, surely?


    Or Lloyds / Bank of Scotland?
    --
    Colin

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 22 10:45:35 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <10871j7$tuf0$1@dont-email.me>, at 11:57:27 on Thu, 21 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <1086utp$tbls$1@dont-email.me>, at 11:11:53 on Thu, 21 Aug
    2025, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> remarked:
    Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
    In message <1084psd$dgd9$1@dont-email.me>, at 16:33:33 on Wed, 20 Aug
    2025, Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> remarked:
    On 20/08/2025 08:39, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <1081cth$3kktk$1@dont-email.me>, at 10:33:53 on Tue, 19 >>>>>> Aug 2025, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> remarked:

    "Cash handling" is free as long as the cash circulates and stays >>>>>>> away from banks.

    As soon as a shop owner has a cash flow that requires him to handle >>>>>>> the daily income, he has to spend an hour or more of his working time >>>>>>> to bring the cah to a bank
    Only if the bank is a long distance away. It might be next door.

    Less and less likely with bank branches closing at an increasing rate. >>>>
    Most of the rural ones are already shut, and closing the last remaining >>>> bank in a town is likely to meet with opposition. So what's happening is >>>> towns with five branches of different banks might become four branches. >>>> I also understand that Nationwide (although not strictly a bank) isn't >>>> closing many, indeed has a policy not to close any before 2028. [Up
    until July 2022 it was closing about one a month, from its chain of 600] >>>
    It might meet with opposition, but they are now leaving some towns without >>> any bank at all. Market Harborough (population 25k) has lost all of its
    bank branches. It still has a Nationwide, but as has been said, it is not >>> really a bank.

    But it does allow people to pay in cash - which is the thing under
    discussion.

    In a very limited fashion. ThererCOs limits on the amount of banknotes they >will accept

    The same ?2k limit a day as personal customers, perhaps. Same limit at
    Post Offices.

    and
    rCLWe do not accept any coins from businesses or traderCY

    That's not unusual. I remember banking with Lloyds 25yrs ago and they'd
    only accept coins which were already bagged. However, in-branch
    coin-counting machines are becoming more common, for example at NatWest.

    Perhaps this might change soon. One of their reasons for buying Virgin
    Money was to expand into business banking.

    I have a Virgin Money account for "petty cash(sic)" purposes, linked to
    a wearable. I can pay in at any Post Office.

    Just as an example of how they arenrCOt really a bank, I went into my >Nationwide branch (Lloyds shuts on a Friday now) to ask for ten one pound >coins (my emergency reserve kept in the car for parking machines that wonrCOt >work in any other fashion, eg my local hospital).

    <thread convergence> And at the moment the Council Carpark near Ely
    station.

    There was much sucking through of teeth as I offered a ten pound note.

    Again, that's not unusual. It's been like that at many banks for ages.

    What I'm surprised at is how businesses seem so uncreative about
    recycling their coins - and when did you last see someone paying more
    than about -u5 in a shop all in coins?

    Are you a customer sir?
    Yes
    IrCOll just have to go round the back to see if we have that many coins.
    On return
    Yes we have the coins. But first you have to pay that note into your
    account and then I can withdraw it as these coins.

    So not really set up for cash handling even for non business users.

    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy Burns@usenet@andyburns.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 22 13:40:14 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Roland Perry wrote:

    However, in-branch coin-counting machines are becoming more common, for example at NatWest.

    Barclays introduced them about 5-6 years ago, and have already removed
    them, they were often out of service, or filled up mid count and the
    staff wouldn't empty them.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 22 14:35:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <1089ofj$1ibt2$1@andyburns.eternal-september.org>, at
    13:40:14 on Fri, 22 Aug 2025, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> remarked: >Roland Perry wrote:

    However, in-branch coin-counting machines are becoming more common,
    for example at NatWest.

    Barclays introduced them about 5-6 years ago, and have already removed
    them, they were often out of service, or filled up mid count and the
    staff wouldn't empty them.

    So staffing issues yet again.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Scott@newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 22 15:24:19 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 13:40:14 +0100, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>
    wrote:

    Roland Perry wrote:

    However, in-branch coin-counting machines are becoming more common, for
    example at NatWest.

    Barclays introduced them about 5-6 years ago, and have already removed
    them, they were often out of service, or filled up mid count and the
    staff wouldn't empty them.

    Why would the staff not empty them? When I was at work, in general
    terms we did what the management told us to do.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy Burns@usenet@andyburns.uk to uk.railway on Fri Aug 22 20:12:05 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    Scott wrote:

    Andy Burns wrote:

    Roland Perry wrote:

    in-branch coin-counting machines are becoming more common

    Barclays introduced them about 5-6 years ago, and have already removed
    them, they were often out of service, or filled up mid count and the
    staff wouldn't empty them.

    Why would the staff not empty them? When I was at work, in general
    terms we did what the management told us to do.

    Dunno if it was expected to be an end-of-day process, and nobody had
    time to do it during the day if some awkward sod turned up with a
    holdall full of coins ...

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Charles Ellson@charlesellson@btinternet.com to uk.railway on Fri Aug 22 23:23:37 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 15:24:19 +0100, Scott
    <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:

    On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 13:40:14 +0100, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>
    wrote:

    Roland Perry wrote:

    However, in-branch coin-counting machines are becoming more common, for >>> example at NatWest.

    Barclays introduced them about 5-6 years ago, and have already removed >>them, they were often out of service, or filled up mid count and the
    staff wouldn't empty them.

    Why would the staff not empty them? When I was at work, in general
    terms we did what the management told us to do.

    More likely would not be emptying them because they are already
    carrying out other tasks, the bank having failed to plan adequate
    management of the machine.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Coffee@martin.coffee@round-midnight.org.uk to uk.railway on Tue Aug 26 21:33:22 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 22/08/2025 23:23, Charles Ellson wrote:
    On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 15:24:19 +0100, Scott
    <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:

    On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 13:40:14 +0100, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>
    wrote:

    Roland Perry wrote:

    However, in-branch coin-counting machines are becoming more common, for >>>> example at NatWest.

    Barclays introduced them about 5-6 years ago, and have already removed
    them, they were often out of service, or filled up mid count and the
    staff wouldn't empty them.

    Why would the staff not empty them? When I was at work, in general
    terms we did what the management told us to do.

    More likely would not be emptying them because they are already
    carrying out other tasks, the bank having failed to plan adequate
    management of the machine.

    Most likely the machines are not emptied by back staff but the bank's
    secure courier contractor.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Roland Perry@roland@perry.uk to uk.railway on Wed Aug 27 09:10:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    In message <108l5mi$7rm8$2@dont-email.me>, at 21:33:22 on Tue, 26 Aug
    2025, Coffee <martin.coffee@round-midnight.org.uk> remarked:
    On 22/08/2025 23:23, Charles Ellson wrote:
    On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 15:24:19 +0100, Scott
    <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:

    On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 13:40:14 +0100, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>
    wrote:

    Roland Perry wrote:

    However, in-branch coin-counting machines are becoming more common, for >>>>> example at NatWest.

    Barclays introduced them about 5-6 years ago, and have already removed >>>> them, they were often out of service, or filled up mid count and the
    staff wouldn't empty them.

    Why would the staff not empty them? When I was at work, in general
    terms we did what the management told us to do.

    More likely would not be emptying them because they are already
    carrying out other tasks, the bank having failed to plan adequate
    management of the machine.

    Most likely the machines are not emptied by back staff but the bank's
    secure courier contractor.

    NatWest's contractors only swap containers of <whatever> with staff the
    other side of an airlock to the back-office. I'd have to look more
    closely at the coin counting machine to see if it was emptied
    customer-side, or like their ATMs back-office side.
    --
    Roland Perry
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Certes@Certes@example.org to uk.railway on Wed Aug 27 13:57:50 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 27/08/2025 09:10, Roland Perry wrote:
    In message <108l5mi$7rm8$2@dont-email.me>, at 21:33:22 on Tue, 26 Aug
    2025, Coffee <martin.coffee@round-midnight.org.uk> remarked:
    On 22/08/2025 23:23, Charles Ellson wrote:
    On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 15:24:19 +0100, Scott
    <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:

    On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 13:40:14 +0100, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>
    wrote:

    Roland Perry wrote:

    However, in-branch coin-counting machines are becoming more
    common, for
    example at NatWest.

    Barclays introduced them about 5-6 years ago, and have already removed >>>>> them, they were often out of service, or filled up mid count and the >>>>> staff wouldn't empty them.

    Why would the staff not empty them? When I was at work, in general
    terms we did what the management told us to do.

    More likely would not be emptying them because they are already
    carrying out other tasks, the bank having failed to plan adequate
    management of the machine.

    Most likely the machines are not emptied by back staff but the bank's
    secure courier contractor.

    NatWest's contractors only swap containers of <whatever> with staff the other side of an airlock to the back-office. I'd have to look more
    closely at the coin counting machine to see if it was emptied
    customer-side, or like their ATMs back-office side.

    I think the discerning pilferer can do better than 10 kg of 2p coins.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Coffee@martin.coffee@round-midnight.org.uk to uk.railway on Wed Aug 27 15:28:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.railway

    On 16/08/2025 09:59, Graeme Wall wrote:
    On 16/08/2025 08:41, JMB99 wrote:
    On 15/08/2025 16:04, Graeme Wall wrote:
    Nobody looks out of the windows. As soon as they sit down out comes
    the phone or tablet and they are buried in that for the rest of the
    journey.


    Is that any worse that sitting reading The Sun or latest Mills & Boon
    book as might happen in the past?




    Just goes to show the travelling public doesn't really care about window alignment.

    I suggest you watch passengers finding a seat on a train. IN GENERAL the facing window seats are the most popular followed by the back window
    seats. After than anything goes.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2