• Struck off Doctors: was Todal etc

    From billy bookcase@billy@anon.com to uk.net.news.moderation on Mon Jul 28 10:55:19 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.net.news.moderation

    "Pamela" <pamela.private.mailbox@gmail.com> wrote in message news:XnsB32A69CD445E31F3QA2@157.180.91.226...
    On 21:04 27 Jul 2025, billy bookcase said:
    "Pamela" <pamela.private.mailbox@gmail.com> wrote in message
    news:XnsB329B5A3590221F3QA2@135.181.20.170...
    On 10:48 27 Jul 2025, billy bookcase said:
    "Pamela" <pamela.private.mailbox@gmail.com> wrote in message
    news:XnsB32967F18F79D1F3QA2@135.181.20.170...
    On 09:11 27 Jul 2025, billy bookcase said:
    "Spike" <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote in message
    news:mejemdF23psU1@mid.individual.net...
    billy bookcase <billy@anon.com> wrote:
    "Spike" <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote in message
    news:mehs81Fol0nU1@mid.individual.net...
    billy bookcase <billy@anon.com> wrote:
    "Spike" <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote

    [.]

    Marxists never question Marxism. Freethinkers question
    everything.

    They obviously don't question Freethinking.

    And you know this how, exactly?

    Because if they did and found any faults with it, then they'd
    no longer be Freethinkers woud they ?

    Logic fail: too many conditionals.

    Only one conditional

    If F and ff, then not F

    That statement is logically impossible. Think about it.

    If D and s/o then not D

    D = Doctor

    s/o = Struck Off

    HTH

    rest snipped

    bb

    Logic statements are not sequential in time.

    The propositions are true/false at a given instant.

    "F" and "not F" can not be true simultaneously.

    Its not "D" and "not D"

    Its "D and s/o" and not "D"

    "D and s/o" and "D" are not the same thing.

    If a doctor is struck off then they are no longer a doctor.

    A doctor who is longer a doctor is not a doctor.

    Both propositions are true by definition.

    Independant of time.


    bb

    You are once again getting muddled about propositional logic statements.


    No I'm not,

    But I did however miss out the "no" in -

    " A doctor who is *no* longer a doctor is not a doctor."

    So thank you for the giving me the opportunity to correct this
    error.

    But just for the record, are you still going to maintain that
    the two statements

    "If a doctor is struck off then they are no longer a doctor."

    "A doctor who is longer a doctor is not a doctor."

    are "sequential" in time ? Either separately or taken together ?

    In your own words please.

    hint: it should either be a "yes" or a "no".

    And at any "given instant" which suits.


    bb

    < Godel's theorem reference snipped >

    Which should of course have been G%del with an Umlaut





    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2