| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 27 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 40:35:53 |
| Calls: | 631 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 1,187 |
| D/L today: |
24 files (29,813K bytes) |
| Messages: | 174,719 |
On 02/12/2022 13:34, Vicky wrote:
I agree it is not as reported. Aparently the offended lady went wired
up to record the incident.
The whole thing is very curious. Interesting article in the Spectator on
it here: ><https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/in-defence-of-lady-susan-hussey/>
First comment is rather revealing (text below)
Why was she able to provide a transcript ? Was she recording it and if
so why ?
Is it just coincidence that the Sussex's book is about to be released ?
Off now to read the "official" transcript...
Tom Cullen
Thanks to Ms Wyatt for this sane column. By the by, Ms "Fulani" was born >with a completely Anglo name, but has been parading herself as Ngozi
Fulani for many years. She comes to an international forum on violence >against women with a name-tag bearing her adopted, not actual,
Africanised name, wearing dreadlocks and African dress, and is then
shocked out of her mind that a doddering but kindly 80+ Englishwoman
asks where she is from.
Meanwhile, great activist that she is on behalf of women the globe over >being raped, tortured, imprisoned, killed by partners, Ms "Fulani"
managed to obliterate all public focus on the cause at the heart of the >event to which all those high-profile women were invited. All attention
is now, instead, on Ms Fulani and her traumatic experience of "prolonged >racism" - despite footage from the event showing her speaking animatedly
to the Queen afterward. There are also photographs of Ms Fulani many
years ago showing her laughing delightedly sitting next to the then
Prince of Wales at another event.
Ms Fulani is also on record as stating on Twitter, after the Sussex's >disastrous, and filled with lies interview with Oprah Winfrey, that "it >appears that Meghan suffered domestic violence from her in-laws". That
any activist for this issue would equate the violence that kills, maims,
and mars the lives of millions of women globally each year with Meghan >pouting about how she wasn't treated as well as she thought she
deserved, for which Meghan smeared an entire family with totally
unsupported claims such that even her hand-puppet, Omid Scobie, admitted >that Meghan "might have misinterpreted" why her son wasn't made an HRH
at birth . . .
Ms Fulani managed to erase all public focus on the reason for the event,
and instead placed it squarely on herself. The other women present from >other countries might as well have saved the carbon emissions it cost
the environment to attend. The good the event might have done on our
side of the Pond, and that the Waleses are trying to do for the planet
on the other side, all into the bin because of a hugely overblown story
that gives yet another questionable "activist" lots of headline space.
And, how is that Ms Fulani also came prepared to record private >conversations?
Misan Harriman, by the way, is a close friend of the Sussexes. >Fulani/Headley has accused the RF of domestic violence against Meghan.
And all just as the Prince and Princess of Wales set out on an extremely >important foreign visit, Prince Harry's case trying to force Britain to
give him the right to armed 24/7 security is upcoming, a retiring
security officer suddenly feels minded to talk about threats to Meghan >whilst she was enjoying all the perks of royalty, and the Sussexes
prepare to court round condemnation for accepting an award based on
spurious charges of racism against an entire family - whose name Meghan >brandishes at every opportunity, and who put her on the global map in a
way her own talents failed to do after two decades trying.
The irony is, the reception for the Waleses in Boston was absolutely >rapturous, and, yet again, the Waleses look like nothing so much as the >victims of a deliberate smear campaign.
The Palace should have looked up Fulani's/Headley's track record on
public comments and left her off the guest list. In future, it should do
a better job of vetting guests and insist that mobiles be left at the door.
This is a poster illustration for that old adage, "No good deed goes >unpunished."