• AA cell discharger

    From PeterC@giraffenos.pam@homecall.co.uk to uk.d-i-y on Fri Oct 10 22:15:50 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.d-i-y

    I'm having trouble with the Eneloop/Panasonic and Fujitsu cells that I use
    in the electric toothbrushes.
    For a while I was charging them on 150mA but it takes a long time for 12 + other cells (done in batches), so started using the default of 350mA.
    Now they'll run the brush but slowly and little torque.

    The two brushes are alternated so that they can be lubed a bit and they've
    been running well. Tried two ordinary Eneloops and ran OK.

    Managed, over several days, to get two cells down to about 1.15V, slow
    charge, lot better but not quite there. Both bushes are the sam.

    I need some way of getting the cells down to about 1.1V that's simple and
    not too fast.
    --
    Peter.
    The gods will stay away
    whilst religions hold sway
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Fredxx@fredxx@spam.invalid to uk.d-i-y on Fri Oct 10 22:30:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.d-i-y

    On 10/10/2025 22:15, PeterC wrote:

    I need some way of getting the cells down to about 1.1V that's simple and
    not too fast.

    Why?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Theo@theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk to uk.d-i-y on Fri Oct 10 22:35:39 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.d-i-y

    PeterC <giraffenos.pam@homecall.co.uk> wrote:
    I'm having trouble with the Eneloop/Panasonic and Fujitsu cells that I use
    in the electric toothbrushes.
    For a while I was charging them on 150mA but it takes a long time for 12 + other cells (done in batches), so started using the default of 350mA.
    Now they'll run the brush but slowly and little torque.

    The two brushes are alternated so that they can be lubed a bit and they've been running well. Tried two ordinary Eneloops and ran OK.

    Managed, over several days, to get two cells down to about 1.15V, slow charge, lot better but not quite there. Both bushes are the sam.

    I need some way of getting the cells down to about 1.1V that's simple and
    not too fast.

    Stack up Schottky diodes until their combined forward voltages are about
    1.1V. Then put in a series resistor to limit the current to some maximum
    based on the starting voltage of the cell (and the power dissipation rating
    of the diodes).

    Although it might be worth investing in a smart charger that can charge and discharge cells at different currents while measuring their capacity.

    Theo
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Fredxx@fredxx@spam.invalid to uk.d-i-y on Fri Oct 10 22:54:52 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.d-i-y

    On 10/10/2025 22:15, PeterC wrote:

    <snip>

    For a while I was charging them on 150mA but it takes a long time for 12 + other cells (done in batches), so started using the default of 350mA.

    Are you saying that you're charging these in parallel?

    I can only recommend getting a half decent charger that detects the end
    point, not just a timer variety of charger.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to uk.d-i-y on Fri Oct 10 23:23:20 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.d-i-y

    On Fri, 10/10/2025 5:15 PM, PeterC wrote:
    I'm having trouble with the Eneloop/Panasonic and Fujitsu cells that I use
    in the electric toothbrushes.
    For a while I was charging them on 150mA but it takes a long time for 12 + other cells (done in batches), so started using the default of 350mA.
    Now they'll run the brush but slowly and little torque.

    The two brushes are alternated so that they can be lubed a bit and they've been running well. Tried two ordinary Eneloops and ran OK.

    Managed, over several days, to get two cells down to about 1.15V, slow charge, lot better but not quite there. Both bushes are the sam.

    I need some way of getting the cells down to about 1.1V that's simple and
    not too fast.


    Build yourself a push-pull regulator. The linear regulator ADR510, could discharge at 10mA on its own. Amplified with a ua741, that raises
    the drive level to 25mA or so. This OpAmp (DIP package, 8 legs),
    can sink or source 80mA. The OpAmp is a "rail-to-rail" design,
    well not really, but close enough to that property, for this
    project to work. There are a few OpAmps that swing right down to
    zero volts (using a negative bias generator internally).

    https://www.st.com/resource/en/datasheet/ts921.pdf 80ma

    VCC=3V VOH=2.63V VOL=0.18V # Rail to Rail swing, 1V output possible VCC=5V VOH=4.4V VOL=0.30V

    Eneloop 1.45V off the charger 4.7 ohms or 5.6 ohms to a 1V discharge terminal
    1.27V rough median while discharging (57mA)

    This is a 1.000V reference. ADR510ARTZ. SOT23 (eye sight test!)

    https://www.analog.com/en/products/adr510.html

    Amplify the voltage reference with a voltage follower OpAmp (8 pin dip) amplifier config.

    +-----------------+ Output resistor to avoid
    | | more than 80mA, assumes battery
    | VCC | didn't come off charger, seconds ago :-)
    | | |
    | 7 | |
    VCC | +--------+ |
    | +---- | 4.7 ohms
    R1 33K 2 6 |
    | ---+----- R2 -------- Eneloop
    +--------------- TS921 |
    1 | 3 Voltage |
    ADR510 +--------+ Follower GND
    2 | 4 | OpAmp
    | | Configuration
    GND GND

    If you want less than 80mA, make R2 have a higher resistance value.
    R1 isn't too critical, and you could use 10K there if you wanted.

    Vdiff^2
    ----- = Pdiss of Resistor R2, 1/4 watt resistor is fine for the 4.7 ohm resistor
    R2

    The purpose of this circuit, is not just discharge. You can leave
    this on the battery all day long if you like, as the discharger
    will not allow the battery to go below 1.0V . Regular discharge
    circuits (that resistor that was burning your hand), they could
    drag the battery below the knee you were trying to hit. With a
    push pull regulator, that can't happen.

    It still approaches the desired voltage asymptotically. If the
    amp had a good quality current limit behavior, you could remove R2
    entirely, safe in the knowledge more than 80mA would not flow.
    The reason I put R2 in there, is to "avoid surprises". With R2
    gone, it gets to 1.0V a lot faster. As the Vdiff gets smaller
    and smaller, the discharger becomes less and less effective due
    to R2 being there. The discharger could "slap the battery silly"
    ... if it was allowed to run using its internal current limit to
    fix the behavior.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From PeterC@giraffenos.pam@homecall.co.uk to uk.d-i-y on Sat Oct 11 17:54:09 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.d-i-y

    On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 22:30:53 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

    On 10/10/2025 22:15, PeterC wrote:

    I need some way of getting the cells down to about 1.1V that's simple and
    not too fast.

    Why?

    So that I can recharge them slowly.
    --
    Peter.
    The gods will stay away
    whilst religions hold sway
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From PeterC@giraffenos.pam@homecall.co.uk to uk.d-i-y on Sat Oct 11 17:56:40 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.d-i-y

    On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 22:54:52 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

    On 10/10/2025 22:15, PeterC wrote:

    <snip>

    For a while I was charging them on 150mA but it takes a long time for 12 + >> other cells (done in batches), so started using the default of 350mA.

    Are you saying that you're charging these in parallel?

    I can only recommend getting a half decent charger that detects the end point, not just a timer variety of charger.

    It does that. If necessary it conditions the cells first. There are 4
    separate channels that can be adjusted individually.
    --
    Peter.
    The gods will stay away
    whilst religions hold sway
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Fredxx@fredxx@spam.invalid to uk.d-i-y on Sat Oct 11 20:23:24 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.d-i-y

    On 11/10/2025 17:54, PeterC wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 22:30:53 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

    On 10/10/2025 22:15, PeterC wrote:

    I need some way of getting the cells down to about 1.1V that's simple and >>> not too fast.

    Why?

    So that I can recharge them slowly.

    How will that help to "recharge them slowly"?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Fredxx@fredxx@spam.invalid to uk.d-i-y on Sat Oct 11 20:24:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.d-i-y

    On 11/10/2025 17:56, PeterC wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 22:54:52 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

    On 10/10/2025 22:15, PeterC wrote:

    <snip>

    For a while I was charging them on 150mA but it takes a long time for 12 + >>> other cells (done in batches), so started using the default of 350mA.

    Are you saying that you're charging these in parallel?

    It might be helpful to answer this question.

    I can only recommend getting a half decent charger that detects the end
    point, not just a timer variety of charger.

    It does that. If necessary it conditions the cells first. There are 4 separate channels that can be adjusted individually.

    Or provide details of the charger?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy Burns@usenet@andyburns.uk to uk.d-i-y on Sun Oct 12 07:55:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.d-i-y

    Fredxx wrote:

    Are you saying that you're charging these in parallel?

    It might be helpful to answer this question.
    Didn't he say the charger had 4 individual bays?

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Fredxx@fredxx@spam.invalid to uk.d-i-y on Sun Oct 12 12:19:57 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.d-i-y

    On 12/10/2025 07:55, Andy Burns wrote:
    Fredxx wrote:

    Are you saying that you're charging these in parallel?

    It might be helpful to answer this question.
    Didn't he say the charger had 4 individual bays?


    A re-read does say that and I now understand what he's trying to say.

    It does seems that at 350mA the end point is being detected early.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Pamela@pamela.private.mailbox@gmail.com to uk.d-i-y on Sun Oct 12 14:50:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.d-i-y

    On 17:56 11 Oct 2025, PeterC said:
    On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 22:54:52 +0100, Fredxx wrote:
    On 10/10/2025 22:15, PeterC wrote:

    <snip>

    For a while I was charging them on 150mA but it takes a long time
    for 12 + other cells (done in batches), so started using the
    default of 350mA.

    Are you saying that you're charging these in parallel?

    I can only recommend getting a half decent charger that detects the
    end point, not just a timer variety of charger.

    It does that. If necessary it conditions the cells first. There are 4 separate channels that can be adjusted individually.

    Presumably the conditioning the charger is doing is to run the cell down
    (to a voltage like the 1.1V you mentioned) and then charging up.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Pamela@pamela.private.mailbox@gmail.com to uk.d-i-y on Sun Oct 12 14:51:09 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.d-i-y

    On 12:19 12 Oct 2025, Fredxx said:
    On 12/10/2025 07:55, Andy Burns wrote:
    Fredxx wrote:

    Are you saying that you're charging these in parallel?

    It might be helpful to answer this question.
    Didn't he say the charger had 4 individual bays?


    A re-read does say that and I now understand what he's trying to say.

    It does seems that at 350mA the end point is being detected early.

    AA Eneloops hold 2000 mAh and he's charging at a slow rate (350mA is
    approx 0.2C). Maybe the charger is detecting some trivial voltage
    fluctuation long before the full charge point. For this reason I prefer
    0.5C (even C) for AA cells.

    However he's been charging his cells for some time before this problem.
    So perhaps the cells are exhausted, as Eneloops tend not to have a
    memory effect.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From PeterC@giraffenos.pam@homecall.co.uk to uk.d-i-y on Sun Oct 12 17:50:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.d-i-y

    On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 20:24:58 +0100, in uk.d-i-y you wrote:

    On 11/10/2025 17:56, PeterC wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 22:54:52 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

    On 10/10/2025 22:15, PeterC wrote:

    <snip>

    For a while I was charging them on 150mA but it takes a long time for 12 + >>>> other cells (done in batches), so started using the default of 350mA.

    Are you saying that you're charging these in parallel?

    It might be helpful to answer this question.

    4 separate channels. It'll take, e.g., Eneloop at 150mA, Fujitsu at 375mA
    and a lithium in another.

    I can only recommend getting a half decent charger that detects the end
    point, not just a timer variety of charger.

    It does that. If necessary it conditions the cells first. There are 4
    separate channels that can be adjusted individually.

    Or provide details of the charger?

    Nitecore Digicharger, as recommended in this group when I asked.
    --
    Peter.
    The gods will stay away
    whilst religions hold sway

    --
    Peter.
    The gods will stay away
    whilst religions hold sway
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From PeterC@giraffenos.pam@homecall.co.uk to uk.d-i-y on Sun Oct 12 17:55:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.d-i-y

    On Sun, 12 Oct 2025 14:51:09 +0100, Pamela wrote:

    On 12:19 12 Oct 2025, Fredxx said:
    On 12/10/2025 07:55, Andy Burns wrote:
    Fredxx wrote:

    Are you saying that you're charging these in parallel?

    It might be helpful to answer this question.
    Didn't he say the charger had 4 individual bays?


    A re-read does say that and I now understand what he's trying to say.

    It does seems that at 350mA the end point is being detected early.

    AA Eneloops hold 2000 mAh and he's charging at a slow rate (350mA is
    approx 0.2C). Maybe the charger is detecting some trivial voltage
    fluctuation long before the full charge point. For this reason I prefer
    0.5C (even C) for AA cells.

    However he's been charging his cells for some time before this problem.
    So perhaps the cells are exhausted, as Eneloops tend not to have a
    memory effect.

    They are Pros - 2.4Ah - good for 'up to' 500 charges. Mine, allthough
    several years old, get recharged every 18 weeks, so haven' been charged many times (<3x/year.

    I was using 150mA then got impatient and went to 375mA; that's when the
    trouble started.
    --
    Peter.
    The gods will stay away
    whilst religions hold sway
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Fredxx@fredxx@spam.invalid to uk.d-i-y on Sun Oct 12 19:02:11 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.d-i-y

    On 12/10/2025 17:50, PeterC wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 20:24:58 +0100, in uk.d-i-y you wrote:

    On 11/10/2025 17:56, PeterC wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 22:54:52 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

    On 10/10/2025 22:15, PeterC wrote:

    <snip>

    For a while I was charging them on 150mA but it takes a long time for 12 +
    other cells (done in batches), so started using the default of 350mA. >>>>
    Are you saying that you're charging these in parallel?

    It might be helpful to answer this question.

    4 separate channels. It'll take, e.g., Eneloop at 150mA, Fujitsu at 375mA
    and a lithium in another.

    I can only recommend getting a half decent charger that detects the end >>>> point, not just a timer variety of charger.

    It does that. If necessary it conditions the cells first. There are 4
    separate channels that can be adjusted individually.

    Or provide details of the charger?

    Nitecore Digicharger, as recommended in this group when I asked.

    There are 6 models that take 4 batteries. I've looked at a couple and
    they charge at much higher currents than 150mA.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Pamela@pamela.private.mailbox@gmail.com to uk.d-i-y on Mon Oct 13 16:23:37 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.d-i-y

    On 17:56 11 Oct 2025, PeterC said:
    On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 22:54:52 +0100, Fredxx wrote:
    On 10/10/2025 22:15, PeterC wrote:

    <snip>

    For a while I was charging them on 150mA but it takes a long time
    for 12 + other cells (done in batches), so started using the
    default of 350mA.

    Are you saying that you're charging these in parallel?

    I can only recommend getting a half decent charger that detects the
    end point, not just a timer variety of charger.

    It does that. If necessary it conditions the cells first. There are 4 separate channels that can be adjusted individually.

    I believe the Nitecore Digicharger (which you mentioned elsewhere in this thread) doesn't condition batteries first.

    As an test, I wonder how complete cells get charged if you charged at 750
    mA. (Use only 2 cells in slots 1 and 3.)

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From PeterC@giraffenos.pam@homecall.co.uk to uk.d-i-y on Mon Oct 13 18:19:19 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.d-i-y

    On Mon, 13 Oct 2025 16:23:37 +0100, Pamela wrote:

    On 17:56 11 Oct 2025, PeterC said:
    On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 22:54:52 +0100, Fredxx wrote:
    On 10/10/2025 22:15, PeterC wrote:

    <snip>

    For a while I was charging them on 150mA but it takes a long time
    for 12 + other cells (done in batches), so started using the
    default of 350mA.

    Are you saying that you're charging these in parallel?

    I can only recommend getting a half decent charger that detects the
    end point, not just a timer variety of charger.

    It does that. If necessary it conditions the cells first. There are 4
    separate channels that can be adjusted individually.

    I believe the Nitecore Digicharger (which you mentioned elsewhere in this thread) doesn't condition batteries first.

    As an test, I wonder how complete cells get charged if you charged at 750 mA. (Use only 2 cells in slots 1 and 3.)

    that is correct. It will go to 750mA for a start then drop back to 350mA. It will do that on all 4 slots - as I have said several time the slots are completely separate.
    --
    Peter.
    The gods will stay away
    whilst religions hold sway
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From PeterC@giraffenos.pam@homecall.co.uk to uk.d-i-y on Mon Oct 13 18:22:42 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.d-i-y

    On Sun, 12 Oct 2025 19:02:11 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

    On 12/10/2025 17:50, PeterC wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 20:24:58 +0100, in uk.d-i-y you wrote:

    On 11/10/2025 17:56, PeterC wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 22:54:52 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

    On 10/10/2025 22:15, PeterC wrote:

    <snip>

    For a while I was charging them on 150mA but it takes a long time for 12 +
    other cells (done in batches), so started using the default of 350mA. >>>>>
    Are you saying that you're charging these in parallel?

    It might be helpful to answer this question.

    4 separate channels. It'll take, e.g., Eneloop at 150mA, Fujitsu at 375mA
    and a lithium in another.

    I can only recommend getting a half decent charger that detects the end >>>>> point, not just a timer variety of charger.

    It does that. If necessary it conditions the cells first. There are 4
    separate channels that can be adjusted individually.

    Or provide details of the charger?

    Nitecore Digicharger, as recommended in this group when I asked.

    There are 6 models that take 4 batteries. I've looked at a couple and
    they charge at much higher currents than 150mA.

    When it's 350mA, pressing and holding the lower button for about 1S will
    change it to 150mA. (Holding in the top button for a couple of seconds turns off the backlight).
    --
    Peter.
    The gods will stay away
    whilst religions hold sway
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From PeterC@giraffenos.pam@homecall.co.uk to uk.d-i-y on Wed Oct 15 17:20:25 2025
    From Newsgroup: uk.d-i-y

    On Sun, 12 Oct 2025 19:02:11 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

    On 12/10/2025 17:50, PeterC wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 20:24:58 +0100, in uk.d-i-y you wrote:

    On 11/10/2025 17:56, PeterC wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 22:54:52 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

    On 10/10/2025 22:15, PeterC wrote:

    <snip>

    For a while I was charging them on 150mA but it takes a long time for 12 +
    other cells (done in batches), so started using the default of 350mA. >>>>>
    Are you saying that you're charging these in parallel?

    It might be helpful to answer this question.

    4 separate channels. It'll take, e.g., Eneloop at 150mA, Fujitsu at 375mA
    and a lithium in another.

    I can only recommend getting a half decent charger that detects the end >>>>> point, not just a timer variety of charger.

    It does that. If necessary it conditions the cells first. There are 4
    separate channels that can be adjusted individually.

    Or provide details of the charger?

    Nitecore Digicharger, as recommended in this group when I asked.

    There are 6 models that take 4 batteries. I've looked at a couple and
    they charge at much higher currents than 150mA.

    OK, sort of solved the discharching.
    I've a couple of puck lights that take 3 AA cells. One is at the side of the ped and the other in the bathroom. They save using clacky pull-switches
    during the night. Eneloops in, leave bathroom one on all night, bedroom on
    all day. Couple of days or so they go to around 1V. Into charger, let them
    run at 350 mA for a couple of minutes then down to 150mA. 17 hours they're charged (no trickle current) and are at 1.48V.
    Next is to try them in a brush.
    --
    Peter.
    The gods will stay away
    whilst religions hold sway
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2