| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 27 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 46:05:40 |
| Calls: | 632 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 1,187 |
| D/L today: |
24 files (29,813K bytes) |
| Messages: | 176,480 |
I think we all can see where this is going, after repeated widespread protests by local residents concerned about the safety of women and girls
in the circumstances surrounding their communities.
The full article is available at the link below:
<https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c24rmdngrrjo>
Quote:
Police forces will be granted powers to put conditions on repeat protests, the government has announced, a day after nearly 500 protesters were arrested.
Senior officers will be able to consider the "cumulative impact" of
previous protests, the Home Office said, which could mean they instruct organisers to hold events elsewhere if a site has seen repeated demonstrations.
Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme the move was not a ban on protests but "about restrictions and conditions".
Unquote.
It parallels such actions as the arrest while waiting for a taxi of 17-year-old ****** *******, who, it could be suggested, was given some extra-judicial sanction quite possibly following his reporting of the protests at the Bell Hotel, and the CPN issued to Ollie Sabotelli, as discussed in a video by BlackBeltBarrister, linked below.
A video of the youth being interviewed outside the Houses of Parliament contains some information concerning his arrest and can be found here:
<https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ho8Tde3vhBQ&pp=ygUXQm9iIGhhcmxvdyBhcnJlc3RlZCAxNyA%3D>
BlackBeltBarristerrCOs video concerning Ollie Sabotelli is here, note the passing reference to 30 arrests a day connected with social media posts:
<https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=O3sRXgwAmOU>
The number of online videos showing police over-reaching their powers or
just making up law as they go along is quite disturbing, not forgetting
their escorting and transporting of the far-left during their confrontation of the peaceful protesters, leading to questions about the source of the over-arching policies that rCyplod on the streetrCO is enforcing heavy-handedly
by such actions.
Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:
<snip>
Wrong group, sorryrCa
On 05/10/2025 09:04 pm, Spike wrote:
Spike <aero.spike@mail.com> wrote:
<snip>
Wrong group, sorryrCa
Wish I'd seen that before I replied... ;-)
Contrary to what they obviously believe, those with an axe to grind do
not have any right at all to harm or inconvenience other people.
Their "protest" should be just that - making their views known, whether
by writing to the Times or Guardian, arguing in online discussion
forums, taking out paid-for ads in the press or on TV/radio or printing
and handing out leaflets. Nothing more.
On 05/10/2025 21:18, JNugent wrote:
Contrary to what they obviously believe, those with an axe to grind do
not have any right at all to harm or inconvenience other people.
Tell that to the 'supporters of palestine', just stop whatever it is
this week, Animal rights, vegetable rights, mineral rights, I dont stick
my dick where you stick yours rights....
Their "protest" should be just that - making their views known,
whether by writing to the Times or Guardian, arguing in online
discussion forums, taking out paid-for ads in the press or on TV/radio
or printing and handing out leaflets. Nothing more.
Right. I can see that really waking people up.
On 06/10/2025 08:40 am, The Natural Philosopher wrote:That all tyhose peole practivce in-yer-face public offensiveness and or violence to 'get what they want'
On 05/10/2025 21:18, JNugent wrote:
I'm not at all sure what you're getting at with that.Contrary to what they obviously believe, those with an axe to grind
do not have any right at all to harm or inconvenience other people.
Tell that to the 'supporters of palestine', just stop whatever it is
this week, Animal rights, vegetable rights, mineral rights, I dont
stick my dick where you stick yours rights....
Their "protest" should be just that - making their views known,
whether by writing to the Times or Guardian, arguing in online
discussion forums, taking out paid-for ads in the press or on
TV/radio or printing and handing out leaflets. Nothing more.
Right. I can see that really waking people up.
If the only way to persuade to a political point of view ("waking them
up", as it might be arrogantly put) is by committing offences against them... so what?