• "New" "ideas" on origin of life

    From Pro Plyd@invalide@invalid.invalid to talk-origins on Fri Sep 5 22:10:47 2025
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    Here we go again ;)

    https://scitechdaily.com/the-math-says-life-shouldnt-exist-new-study-challenges-origins-theories/

    The study finds liferCOs origin faces severe
    mathematical challenges. Chance alone may
    not be enough.

    A new study addresses one of sciencerCOs most
    enduring questions: how did life first arise
    from nonliving matter on the early Earth?
    Using advanced mathematical methods, Robert
    G. Endres of Imperial College London developed
    a framework indicating that the spontaneous
    emergence of life may have been far more
    difficult than previously thought.
    ...


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/could-extraterrestrials-have-created-life-on-earth-new-study-raises-jaw-dropping-possibilities/ar-AA1LEvhQ

    Could Extraterrestrials Have Created Life on Earth?
    New Study Raises Jaw-Dropping Possibilities


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonO@rokimoto557@gmail.com to talk-origins on Sat Sep 6 09:11:27 2025
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    On 9/5/2025 11:10 PM, Pro Plyd wrote:
    Here we go again ;)

    https://scitechdaily.com/the-math-says-life-shouldnt-exist-new-study- challenges-origins-theories/

    The study finds liferCOs origin faces severe
    mathematical challenges. Chance alone may
    not be enough.

    A new study addresses one of sciencerCOs most
    enduring questions: how did life first arise
    from nonliving matter on the early Earth?
    Using advanced mathematical methods, Robert
    G. Endres of Imperial College London developed
    a framework indicating that the spontaneous
    emergence of life may have been far more
    difficult than previously thought.
    ...


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/could-extraterrestrials-have- created-life-on-earth-new-study-raises-jaw-dropping-possibilities/ar- AA1LEvhQ

    Could Extraterrestrials Have Created Life on Earth?
    New Study Raises Jaw-Dropping Possibilities



    Probably due to GIGO. How can you model something when you do not know
    how it happened? You'd have to model all the possible paths, when you
    don't know what the possible paths are.

    Since they found that lipids are hydrophobic and assemble in water and
    can even form the lipid bilayer of a cell membrane. These associations
    of lipids have been found to have enzymatic activity, but I do not
    recall any origin of life scenarios that start with making lipids, and
    having the lipids make other things. Apparently lipids have hydrophilic
    and hydrophobic parts that can come together and have enzymatic activity.

    The way this guys modeling is described "By applying information theory
    and algorithmic complexity, Endres analyzed what it would take for the earliest living cell, known as a protocell, to self-assemble from simple chemical components." As sad as it may be this guy seems to have
    modeled the tornado through a junk yard scenario. GIGO. If this were
    April 1st I would assume this was a joke. It sounds like a write up of
    Ed Conrad's fossil finds.

    Ron Okimoto

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Athel Cornish-Bowden@me@yahoo.com to talk-origins on Sat Sep 6 19:47:26 2025
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    On 2025-09-06 14:11:27 +0000, RonO said:

    On 9/5/2025 11:10 PM, Pro Plyd wrote:
    Here we go again ;)

    https://scitechdaily.com/the-math-says-life-shouldnt-exist-new-study-
    challenges-origins-theories/

    The study finds liferCOs origin faces severe
    mathematical challenges. Chance alone may
    not be enough.

    A new study addresses one of sciencerCOs most
    enduring questions: how did life first arise
    from nonliving matter on the early Earth?
    Using advanced mathematical methods, Robert
    G. Endres of Imperial College London developed
    a framework indicating that the spontaneous
    emergence of life may have been far more
    difficult than previously thought.
    ...


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/could-extraterrestrials-have-
    created-life-on-earth-new-study-raises-jaw-dropping-possibilities/ar-
    AA1LEvhQ

    Could Extraterrestrials Have Created Life on Earth?
    New Study Raises Jaw-Dropping Possibilities



    Probably due to GIGO. How can you model something when you do not know
    how it happened? You'd have to model all the possible paths, when you
    don't know what the possible paths are.

    Since they found that lipids are hydrophobic and assemble in water

    Who "found" it? That is something I've known for at last half a
    century, and I'll bet that anyone who knew anything about lipids also
    knew it.

    and can even form the lipid bilayer of a cell membrane.

    Likewise. Is this a physicist "discovering" stuff that biologists have
    always known?

    These associations of lipids have been found to have enzymatic
    activity, but I do not recall any origin of life scenarios that start
    with making lipids, and having the lipids make other things.

    Me neither.

    Apparently lipids have hydrophilic and hydrophobic parts

    Is there any biochemist who doesn't know that?

    that can come together and have enzymatic activity.

    That is testable by experiment, not by playing around with a computer model.

    The way this guys modeling is described "By applying information theory
    and algorithmic complexity, Endres analyzed what it would take for the earliest living cell, known as a protocell, to self-assemble from
    simple chemical components." As sad as it may be this guy seems to
    have modeled the tornado through a junk yard scenario. GIGO. If this
    were April 1st I would assume this was a joke. It sounds like a write
    up of Ed Conrad's fossil finds.

    GIGO sums it up. Is this a case of guessing what the mechanism might be
    and then setting up a computer model that shows that the guess won't
    work? Big deal.
    --
    Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 38 years; mainly
    in England until 1987.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Athel Cornish-Bowden@me@yahoo.com to talk-origins on Sat Sep 6 19:57:10 2025
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    On 2025-09-06 04:10:47 +0000, Pro Plyd said:

    Here we go again ;)

    https://scitechdaily.com/the-math-says-life-shouldnt-exist-new-study-challenges-origins-theories/


    The study finds liferCOs origin faces severe
    mathematical challenges. Chance alone may
    not be enough.

    A new study addresses one of sciencerCOs most
    enduring questions: how did life first arise
    from nonliving matter on the early Earth?
    Using advanced mathematical methods, Robert
    G. Endres of Imperial College London developed
    a framework indicating that the spontaneous
    emergence of life may have been far more
    difficult than previously thought.
    ...


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/could-extraterrestrials-have-created-life-on-earth-new-study-raises-jaw-dropping-possibilities/ar-AA1LEvhQ


    Could Extraterrestrials Have Created Life on Earth?

    If you think the universe is infinitely old, as I think Fred Hoyle did,
    then that's a possibility. If you think it has an age about five times
    the time the earth has been cool enough (the big-bang idea, which Hoyle
    did _not_ accept), then the improvement in odds isn't worth bothering
    with. You just move the problem of exlaining how life started to a
    different place, adding an extra improbability as you need to explain
    how it got here from that different place.

    New Study Raises Jaw-Dropping Possibilities
    --
    Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 38 years; mainly
    in England until 1987.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonO@rokimoto557@gmail.com to talk-origins on Sat Sep 6 14:14:02 2025
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    On 9/6/2025 12:47 PM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
    On 2025-09-06 14:11:27 +0000, RonO said:

    On 9/5/2025 11:10 PM, Pro Plyd wrote:
    Here we go again ;)

    https://scitechdaily.com/the-math-says-life-shouldnt-exist-new-study-
    challenges-origins-theories/

    The study finds life|ore4raos origin faces severe
    mathematical challenges. Chance alone may
    not be enough.

    A new study addresses one of science|ore4raos most
    enduring questions: how did life first arise
    from nonliving matter on the early Earth?
    Using advanced mathematical methods, Robert
    G. Endres of Imperial College London developed
    a framework indicating that the spontaneous
    emergence of life may have been far more
    difficult than previously thought.
    ...


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/could-extraterrestrials-
    have- created-life-on-earth-new-study-raises-jaw-dropping-
    possibilities/ar- AA1LEvhQ

    Could Extraterrestrials Have Created Life on Earth?
    New Study Raises Jaw-Dropping Possibilities



    Probably due to GIGO.-a How can you model something when you do not
    know how it happened?-a You'd have to model all the possible paths,
    when you don't know what the possible paths are.

    Since they found that lipids are hydrophobic and assemble in water

    Who "found" it? That is something I've known for at last half a century,
    and I'll bet that anyone who knew anything about lipids also knew it.d

    I don't know. It is just something that has been kicking around for a
    while. No one ever makes a big deal about it, but it demonstrates that
    other molecules besides proteins and RNAs can have catalytic ability,
    and that is what is needed to get the first self replicators going.


    -aand can even form the lipid bilayer of a cell membrane.

    Likewise. Is this a physicist "discovering" stuff that biologists have always known?

    No. He seems to be repeating the tornado through a junkyard probability estimate that Dembski made a couple of decades ago to create his
    information needed for life. Dembski admitted that it was a valid test
    almost as soon as the book was published. The article hasn't been
    passed peer review at this time. It is posted at a prepeer review site.


    -a These associations of lipids have been found to have enzymatic
    activity, but I do not recall any origin of life scenarios that start
    with making lipids, and having the lipids make other things.

    Me neither.

    It seems strange because you can make cellular blobs of lipid that would
    be doing enzymatic things like making more lipids or lipid precursors.


    -a Apparently lipids have hydrophilic and hydrophobic parts

    Is there any biochemist who doesn't know that?

    Probably not, but this guy may be a physicist.


    -athat can come together and have enzymatic activity.

    That is testable by experiment, not by playing around with a computer
    model.

    The way this guys modeling is described "By applying information
    theory and algorithmic complexity, Endres analyzed what it would take
    for the earliest living cell, known as a protocell, to self-assemble
    from simple chemical components."-a As sad as it may be this guy seems
    to have modeled the tornado through a junk yard scenario.-a GIGO.-a If
    this were April 1st I would assume this was a joke.-a It sounds like a
    write up of Ed Conrad's fossil finds.

    GIGO sums it up. Is this a case of guessing what the mechanism might be
    and then setting up a computer model that shows that the guess won't
    work? Big deal.


    The paper just hand waves mechanisms away and estimates the likely hood
    and time it would take to get all the parts assembled to create the
    first cell.

    Ron Okimoto

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ernest Major@{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk to talk-origins on Sat Sep 6 20:32:46 2025
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    On 06/09/2025 20:14, RonO wrote:


    -a Apparently lipids have hydrophilic and hydrophobic parts

    Is there any biochemist who doesn't know that?

    Probably not, but this guy may be a physicist.

    https://profiles.imperial.ac.uk/r.endres
    --
    alias Ernest Major

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonO@rokimoto557@gmail.com to talk-origins on Sat Sep 6 15:03:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    On 9/6/2025 12:57 PM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
    On 2025-09-06 04:10:47 +0000, Pro Plyd said:

    Here we go again ;)

    https://scitechdaily.com/the-math-says-life-shouldnt-exist-new-study-
    challenges-origins-theories/

    The study finds liferCOs origin faces severe
    mathematical challenges. Chance alone may
    not be enough.

    A new study addresses one of sciencerCOs most
    enduring questions: how did life first arise
    from nonliving matter on the early Earth?
    Using advanced mathematical methods, Robert
    G. Endres of Imperial College London developed
    a framework indicating that the spontaneous
    emergence of life may have been far more
    difficult than previously thought.
    ...


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/could-extraterrestrials-
    have-created-life-on-earth-new-study-raises-jaw-dropping-
    possibilities/ar-AA1LEvhQ

    Could Extraterrestrials Have Created Life on Earth?

    If you think the universe is infinitely old, as I think Fred Hoyle did,
    then that's a possibility. If you think it has an age about five times
    the time the earth has been cool enough (the big-bang idea, which Hoyle
    did _not_ accept), then the improvement in odds isn't worth bothering
    with. You just move the problem of exlaining how life started to a
    different place, adding an extra improbability as you need to explain
    how it got here from that different place.

    Where in our galaxy could life have arisen where it didn't get snuffed
    out by exploding stellar neighbors. In our star poor region of the
    galaxy it took over 8 billion years to produce all the elements needed
    to make life possible and to flourish. Not only that, but the claim is
    that most of the carbon in the universe has been created in stars that
    do not go bang. These are longer lived stars like ours that turn into
    red giants to expel their carbon. Super nova create the elements
    heavier than iron.

    Ron Okimoto>
    New Study Raises Jaw-Dropping Possibilities



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From William Hyde@wthyde1953@gmail.com to talk-origins on Sat Sep 6 17:49:18 2025
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    RonO wrote:
    On 9/6/2025 12:57 PM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
    On 2025-09-06 04:10:47 +0000, Pro Plyd said:

    Here we go again ;)

    https://scitechdaily.com/the-math-says-life-shouldnt-exist-new-study-
    challenges-origins-theories/

    The study finds liferCOs origin faces severe
    mathematical challenges. Chance alone may
    not be enough.

    A new study addresses one of sciencerCOs most
    enduring questions: how did life first arise
    from nonliving matter on the early Earth?
    Using advanced mathematical methods, Robert
    G. Endres of Imperial College London developed
    a framework indicating that the spontaneous
    emergence of life may have been far more
    difficult than previously thought.
    ...


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/could-extraterrestrials-
    have-created-life-on-earth-new-study-raises-jaw-dropping-
    possibilities/ar-AA1LEvhQ

    Could Extraterrestrials Have Created Life on Earth?

    If you think the universe is infinitely old, as I think Fred Hoyle
    did, then that's a possibility. If you think it has an age about five
    times the time the earth has been cool enough (the big-bang idea,
    which Hoyle did _not_ accept), then the improvement in odds isn't
    worth bothering with. You just move the problem of exlaining how life
    started to a different place, adding an extra improbability as you
    need to explain how it got here from that different place.

    Where in our galaxy could life have arisen where it didn't get snuffed
    out by exploding stellar neighbors.-a In our star poor region of the
    galaxy it took over 8 billion years to produce all the elements needed
    to make life possible and to flourish.-a Not only that, but the claim is that most of the carbon in the universe has been created in stars that
    do not go bang.-a These are longer lived stars like ours that turn into
    red giants to expel their carbon.-a Super nova create the elements
    heavier than iron.

    This was in fact one of Hoyle's great contributions.

    It now seems to be accepted that a large fraction of the elements
    heavier than iron are created in neutron star collisions. Though we
    have detected one by the resulting gravity waves these must be rare,
    this being compensated by the fact that the huge amount of ejected
    material consists largely of heavy elements.

    But as white dwarfs are vastly more common, and sometimes composed
    largely of carbon, I wonder if a white dwarf/brown or red dwarf
    collision might not eject a great deal of carbon and other light
    elements into space. I do not think these collisions will produce a
    gravity wave remotely detectable at the current time, so we will be
    unable to observe these unless one occurs in our neighborhood.

    A collision of two white dwarfs would seem likely to result in a neutron
    star or black hole but even then a great deal of mass might be ejected.
    I've no idea whether this would produce a gravity wave detectable with
    current or near future technology.

    But then, as supernovae eject huge amounts of carbon, oxygen and other
    light elements it may be that while neutron star collisions are
    significant contributors of heavy elements, white dwarf collisions, even
    if more frequent, do not add significantly to the interstellar inventory
    of lighter elements.

    The universe is vastly more active than the rather staid version I
    learned about many years ago.

    William Hyde


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ernest Major@{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk to talk-origins on Sat Sep 6 23:40:17 2025
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    On 06/09/2025 22:49, William Hyde wrote:
    RonO wrote:
    On 9/6/2025 12:57 PM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
    On 2025-09-06 04:10:47 +0000, Pro Plyd said:

    Here we go again ;)

    https://scitechdaily.com/the-math-says-life-shouldnt-exist-new-
    study- challenges-origins-theories/

    The study finds liferCOs origin faces severe
    mathematical challenges. Chance alone may
    not be enough.

    A new study addresses one of sciencerCOs most
    enduring questions: how did life first arise
    from nonliving matter on the early Earth?
    Using advanced mathematical methods, Robert
    G. Endres of Imperial College London developed
    a framework indicating that the spontaneous
    emergence of life may have been far more
    difficult than previously thought.
    ...


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/could-extraterrestrials-
    have-created-life-on-earth-new-study-raises-jaw-dropping-
    possibilities/ar-AA1LEvhQ

    Could Extraterrestrials Have Created Life on Earth?

    If you think the universe is infinitely old, as I think Fred Hoyle
    did, then that's a possibility. If you think it has an age about five
    times the time the earth has been cool enough (the big-bang idea,
    which Hoyle did _not_ accept), then the improvement in odds isn't
    worth bothering with. You just move the problem of exlaining how life
    started to a different place, adding an extra improbability as you
    need to explain how it got here from that different place.

    Where in our galaxy could life have arisen where it didn't get snuffed
    out by exploding stellar neighbors.-a In our star poor region of the
    galaxy it took over 8 billion years to produce all the elements needed
    to make life possible and to flourish.-a Not only that, but the claim
    is that most of the carbon in the universe has been created in stars
    that do not go bang.-a These are longer lived stars like ours that turn
    into red giants to expel their carbon.-a Super nova create the elements
    heavier than iron.

    This was in fact one of Hoyle's great contributions.

    It now seems to be accepted that a large fraction of-a the elements
    heavier than iron are created in neutron star collisions.-a Though we
    have detected one by the resulting gravity waves these must be rare,
    this being compensated by the fact that the huge amount of ejected
    material consists largely of heavy elements.

    But as white dwarfs are vastly more common, and sometimes composed
    largely of carbon, I wonder if a white dwarf/brown or red dwarf
    collision might not eject a great deal of carbon and other light
    elements into space. I do not think these collisions will produce a
    gravity wave remotely detectable at the current time, so we will be
    unable to observe these unless one occurs in our neighborhood.

    A collision of two white dwarfs would seem likely to result in a neutron star or black hole but even then a great deal of mass might be ejected.
    I've no idea whether this would produce a gravity wave detectable with current or near future technology.

    But then, as supernovae eject huge amounts of carbon, oxygen and other
    light elements it may be that while neutron star collisions are
    significant contributors of heavy elements, white dwarf collisions, even
    if more frequent, do not add significantly to the interstellar inventory
    of lighter elements.

    White dwarf collisions are expected to cause type 1a supernovae ("double degenerate model"), but I do expect that they're less frequent than the alternative path of accretion from a companion star overflowing its
    Roche lobe.>
    The universe is vastly more active than the rather staid version I
    learned about many years ago.

    William Hyde


    --
    alias Ernest Major

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonO@rokimoto557@gmail.com to talk-origins on Fri Sep 12 08:59:08 2025
    From Newsgroup: talk.origins

    On 9/6/2025 2:14 PM, RonO wrote:
    On 9/6/2025 12:47 PM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
    On 2025-09-06 14:11:27 +0000, RonO said:

    On 9/5/2025 11:10 PM, Pro Plyd wrote:
    Here we go again ;)

    https://scitechdaily.com/the-math-says-life-shouldnt-exist-new-
    study- challenges-origins-theories/

    The study finds life|ore4raos origin faces severe
    mathematical challenges. Chance alone may
    not be enough.

    A new study addresses one of science|ore4raos most
    enduring questions: how did life first arise
    from nonliving matter on the early Earth?
    Using advanced mathematical methods, Robert
    G. Endres of Imperial College London developed
    a framework indicating that the spontaneous
    emergence of life may have been far more
    difficult than previously thought.
    ...


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/could-extraterrestrials-
    have- created-life-on-earth-new-study-raises-jaw-dropping-
    possibilities/ar- AA1LEvhQ

    Could Extraterrestrials Have Created Life on Earth?
    New Study Raises Jaw-Dropping Possibilities



    Probably due to GIGO.-a How can you model something when you do not
    know how it happened?-a You'd have to model all the possible paths,
    when you don't know what the possible paths are.

    Since they found that lipids are hydrophobic and assemble in water

    Who "found" it? That is something I've known for at last half a
    century, and I'll bet that anyone who knew anything about lipids also
    knew it.d

    I don't know.-a It is just something that has been kicking around for a while.-a No one ever makes a big deal about it, but it demonstrates that other molecules besides proteins and RNAs can have catalytic ability,
    and that is what is needed to get the first self replicators going.


    -aand can even form the lipid bilayer of a cell membrane.

    Likewise. Is this a physicist "discovering" stuff that biologists have
    always known?

    No.-a He seems to be repeating the tornado through a junkyard probability estimate that Dembski made a couple of decades ago to create his
    information needed for life.-a Dembski admitted that it was a valid test almost as soon as the book was published.-a The article hasn't been
    passed peer review at this time.-a It is posted at a prepeer review site.

    I meant to write that Dembski admitted that it was not a valid test
    almost as soon as the book was published.

    TO regulars might recall that before the Bait and switch started to go
    down that Dembski started claiming that he was going to publish a
    scientific test to verify the ID perp's bogus claims. He wouldn't say
    what it was, only that you had to wait to read his book. After
    publication it turned out that his test was the stupid creationist
    tornado through a junkyard assembly probability argument. Dembski had
    to quickly admit that the test was bogus and was not a valid test for
    the ID scam junk.

    Ron Okimoto



    -a These associations of lipids have been found to have enzymatic
    activity, but I do not recall any origin of life scenarios that start
    with making lipids, and having the lipids make other things.

    Me neither.

    It seems strange because you can make cellular blobs of lipid that would
    be doing enzymatic things like making more lipids or lipid precursors.


    -a Apparently lipids have hydrophilic and hydrophobic parts

    Is there any biochemist who doesn't know that?

    Probably not, but this guy may be a physicist.


    -athat can come together and have enzymatic activity.

    That is testable by experiment, not by playing around with a computer
    model.

    The way this guys modeling is described "By applying information
    theory and algorithmic complexity, Endres analyzed what it would take
    for the earliest living cell, known as a protocell, to self-assemble
    from simple chemical components."-a As sad as it may be this guy seems
    to have modeled the tornado through a junk yard scenario.-a GIGO.-a If
    this were April 1st I would assume this was a joke.-a It sounds like a
    write up of Ed Conrad's fossil finds.

    GIGO sums it up. Is this a case of guessing what the mechanism might
    be and then setting up a computer model that shows that the guess
    won't work? Big deal.


    The paper just hand waves mechanisms away and estimates the likely hood
    and time it would take to get all the parts assembled to create the
    first cell.

    Ron Okimoto


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2