| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 26 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 51:27:54 |
| Calls: | 632 |
| Files: | 1,187 |
| D/L today: |
19 files (17,417K bytes) |
| Messages: | 178,040 |
On Wed, 27 Nov 2024, Janet wrote:
In article <vi7ntb$47u7$1@dont-email.me>, cshenk@virginia-
beach.com says...
-aOverall, we export far more than we import.No, you don't. It's the other way round.-a Try to keep up.
-ahttps://www.farmcrediteast.com/en/resources/Industry-
Trends-and-Outlooks/Reports/202407KEP_AgTradeDeficit
-aJanet UK
Read carefully!
Is the US self-sufficient when it comes to food production?
The United States is largely self-sufficient in food production,
producing a significant amount of its own food and being one of the
largest food exporters globally. To understand this assertion, we can
break down the concept of food self-sufficiency into several key
components: domestic production capacity, import levels, and export capabilities.
Domestic Production Capacity
The U.S. has a vast agricultural landscape that allows for the
cultivation of a wide variety of crops and livestock. The country
benefits from diverse climates and soil types, which enable the growth
of numerous agricultural products ranging from grains like corn and
wheat to fruits, vegetables, and livestock. This diversity contributes
to a robust domestic food supply capable of meeting the needs of its population.
In fact, as of recent data, the U.S. imports only about 20% of the food consumed domestically. This relatively low percentage indicates that the majority of food consumed by Americans is produced within the country itself. The ability to produce such a large volume of food is supported
by advanced agricultural technologies, extensive research in crop
genetics (including genetically engineered crops), and efficient farming practices.
Import Levels
While the U.S. does import some food itemsrCoprimarily specialty products that are not grown domestically or are more cost-effective to importrCothe overall reliance on imports is minimal compared to other countries. For instance, nations like the United Kingdom import nearly 40% of their
food supply, while Hawaii relies heavily on imports for up to 92% of its food needs due to geographical constraints.
The limited level of imports reflects not only agricultural capacity but also consumer preferences that can often be met by domestic producers.
The U.S. agricultural sector has adapted over time to meet changing
dietary trends and demands.
Export Capabilities
Moreover, the U.S. is one of the largest exporters of agricultural
products in the world. It exports significant quantities of corn,
soybeans, wheat, beef, pork, and poultry among other commodities. This export capability further underscores its self-sufficiency; not only
does it produce enough food for its own population but it also generates surplus that can be sold internationally.
The combination of high production levels and relatively low dependence
on imports positions the U.S. as a leader in global agriculture. This self-sufficiency is crucial for national security as it reduces vulnerability to international market fluctuations and trade disruptions.
Conclusion
In summary, the U.S. is indeed self-sufficient when it comes to food production, with a strong capacity for domestic agriculture that meets
most consumption needs while also allowing for substantial exports.
clams casino wrote:
On 11/27/2024 2:20 PM, Jim wrote:As I'm sure you're very aware, this group is very very clicky, it's
Bruce wrote:
Let's make it clickable for cshenkie:I'm not sure but I think she may have flushed you and I.
<https://www.farmcrediteast.com/en/resources/Industry-Trends-and-Outlooks/Reports/202407KEP_AgTradeDeficit>
She's become much more testy and short since the days when SF was the
target here and Julie.
almost as bad as Donald's 'cult' to be accepted in here. When you
step on toes a bit you're labeled as a troll.
In article <viagr5$m2pq$1@dont-email.me>, cshenk@virginia-
beach.com says...
Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
On 2024-11-27, Janet <nobody@home.com> wrote:
Mexico is one of the countries targeted for Trump's
tariffs on his first day in office.
You'll be paying a lot more for them in January.
We may have to start being more interested in our own winter
vegetables. What do you bet, we do? If we don't regulate our own
farmers and ranchers out of existence, we'll be fine.
leo
Agreed Leo. I don't think we have any serious issues. Stats aren't
backing it.
Farming stats show that you import more food than you
export.
An escalating trade deficit is a serious issue to
your economy.
For now, it's all just speculation.
No, it's Trumps policy.
I'm not sure why we have any with
Canada. That one puzzles me. The one on Mexico might possibly be to
support our own Avocado productions?
Trump told the whole world exactly why he's targeting
tariffs on all imports from Mexico, Canada, China.
Do you never read any American news?
Janet UK
clams casino explained on 11/29/2024 :
On 11/28/2024 4:55 PM, Jim wrote:D'oh! That was back when we only had a few
Bruce explained on 11/28/2024 :
On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:38:20 -0500, Jim <jimmy@noneya.invalid> wrote:Ring around the collar?
Bruce wrote:
I would expect a redneck like you to prefer fly-over states.You're way yonder too loose with that 'redneck' term, and you
best be smiling if you say that to a real redneck in person.
clams casino is so right-wing he falls off the scale. And everything
he says has that redneck ring to it.
https://youtu.be/nUwiXl7iz80
?
TV channels, and no remote. Times were so
much simpler back then.
On 2024-11-30 7:13 p.m., Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
On 2024-11-30, gm <gregorymorrow@msn.com> wrote:Hardly surprising!
Ayn Rand would note this is what you get when governments favor the
least productive or even destructive elements of society, while creating >>> difficulties and denouncing those who are productive - and all the while >>> expecting the *productive* to pick up the bills...
My vote is worth as much as Elon's or a LA street junkie's. Elon gives
to vote. I'm neutral. The junkie receives.
Personally, I'd like nobody under 24 to be able to vote and nobody who
doesn't pay income tax either.
Oh...or a flat tax only. The rich s.o.b's pay more because they buy more.
The poor pay less because they buy less. And...everybody, of every age,
gets to vote, providing they can provide a single store receipt showing
they paid a flat tax on something.
I have many, many solutions. Nobody listens!
