From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

W dniu 17.03.2025 o 20:42, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:

All but morons should be able to understand the following:

An observer's speed relative to the observed object can't
affect the properties of the observed object in any way.
But the observer's speed relative to the observed object can affect
the observer's measurements of the properties of the observed object.

Think about it. Obvious, no?

Think about something else, Paul.
if a measurement of a property of an observed
object gives a result different than the real
value of the property, the measurement is
a)valid
b)erroneous
c)UUUUUUU!!!UUUUUUU!!!!!!!!UUUUUUUUUUU!!!!! UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PLONK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Let me guess, the correct relativistic answer
is c, right, poor trash?

All but morons should be able - well, your moron guru \
was not able.
"observer's speed relative to the observed object can
affect the properties of the observed object" -
that was what he postulated.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Maciej Wo+|niak wrote:

W dniu 17.03.2025 o 20:42, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:

Think about it. Obvious, no?

Think about something else, Paul.
if a measurement of a property of an observed object gives a result
different than the real value of the property, the measurement is
a)valid b)erroneous c)UUUUUUU!!!UUUUUUU!!!!!!!!UUUUUUUUUUU!!!!! UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PLONK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Let me guess, the correct relativistic answer is c, right, poor trash?

you just said plonk.. me too, i like america, they work for us. They pay
high tariffs to us; we get from them everything for free.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2