From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity


You literally wrote "overheat" here:

Jordon Molokovsky schrieb:

you assume too much. The 'overheat' is merely based
on the size of memory required, and the number of
instructions sent to the CPU's decoder, together with
data, occupying the bus, through the pipeline, ignoring the
pipeline etc. Not directly related to time. And 'stacks'
ARE memory, not something to 'afford as excess' fucking stoopid.

Maybe you russian bots should use a better ChatGPT translator?

Alton Grammatakakis schrieb:

Mild Shock wrote:

The problem of L1, L2, L3, cache trashing through writes, is not
overheating, but it gets awfully slow,
creating an overhead not overheating.

so fooling around needlessly in CPU's cache is not increasing the temperature.. ; get yourself a proper education, before opening your
stupid mouth.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Mild Shock wrote:

You literally wrote "overheat" here:

Jordon Molokovsky schrieb:

you assume too much. The 'overheat' is merely based on the size of
memory required, and the number of instructions sent to the CPU's
decoder, together with data, occupying the bus, through the pipeline, ignoring the pipeline etc. Not directly related to time. And 'stacks'
ARE memory, not something to 'afford as excess' fucking stoopid.

sense the punctuation, cretin, that's not overheating, then fucking around like stupid in CPU is overheating. Educate yourself civilized maner,
idiot.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Hi,

Yeah don't do this things:
- Don't overclock you CPU if system has poor airflow
- Do not use PC as a ram server rack, power supply not designed for it
- Refrain from usings computers alltogether, you seem to be a moron.

LoL

Bye

Jordon Molokovsky schrieb:

you assume too much. The 'overheat' is merely based on the size of
memory required, and the number of instructions sent to the CPU's
decoder, together with data, occupying the bus, through the pipeline, ignoring the pipeline etc. Not directly related to time. And 'stacks'
ARE memory, not something to 'afford as excess' fucking stoopid.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Mild Shock wrote:

Hi,

Yeah don't do this things:
- Don't overclock you CPU if system has poor airflow - Do not use PC as
a ram server rack, power supply not designed for it - Refrain from
usings computers alltogether, you seem to be a moron. LoL Bye

you stupid polak kike just proved your imbecility in computers and
related, not knowing what you do. Get yourself a proper education, you
stupid fraud wannabe scientist.

Jordon Molokovsky schrieb:

you assume too much. The 'overheat' is merely based on the size of
memory required, and the number of instructions sent to the CPU's
decoder, together with data, occupying the bus, through the pipeline, ignoring the pipeline etc. Not directly related to time. And 'stacks'
ARE memory, not something to 'afford as excess' fucking stoopid.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

Hoi Luigi

Again problems with your micro penis?

Bye

Mizraim Zelenenkov schrieb:

Mild Shock wrote:

Hi,

Yeah don't do this things:
- Don't overclock you CPU if system has poor airflow - Do not use PC as
a ram server rack, power supply not designed for it - Refrain from
usings computers alltogether, you seem to be a moron. LoL Bye

you stupid polak kike just proved your imbecility in computers and
related, not knowing what you do. Get yourself a proper education, you
stupid fraud wannabe scientist.

Jordon Molokovsky schrieb:
> you assume too much. The 'overheat' is merely based on the size of
> memory required, and the number of instructions sent to the CPU's
> decoder, together with data, occupying the bus, through the pipeline,
> ignoring the pipeline etc. Not directly related to time. And 'stacks'
> ARE memory, not something to 'afford as excess' fucking stoopid.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2