Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 25 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 85:23:03 |
Calls: | 494 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 1,078 |
Messages: | 68,374 |
Now for example U238 is far more stable than U235.
Okay? One reason is that the U238 has 3 more electrons to tighten up the
same 92 protons in the nucleus so that makes radioactive decay less.
This comes from the use of Bertietaylor's formula E=A-N.
I suppose even the great-greats here (attention Paul, JimPee, Volney,
Else, Moylan, Athel, Lodder, Occam, Alsing, whodat, Roachie etc.)may
work out that from the above math formula.
Den 02.07.2025 03:30, skrev Bertitaylor:
Now for example U238 is far more stable than U235.
Okay? One reason is that the U238 has 3 more electrons to tighten up the
same 92 protons in the nucleus so that makes radioactive decay less.
This comes from the use of Bertietaylor's formula E=A-N.
Bertietaylor 's formula
"If A is atomic weight and N is atomic number then the number
of electrons E holding the N protons in the nucleus is
E = A - N
Now E may not be an integer. That indicates the electrons for a
particular atom nucleus do not have unit charge on the average."
Atomic weight 238.05078
Atomic number 92
Number of electrons holding the 92 protons in the nucleus is
E = 238.05078 - 92 = 146.05078
So there are 146.05078 electrons "to tighten up the 92 protons
in the nucleus."
But according to Bertitaylor there are 146 other protons in the nucleus.
What are holding these protons together?
I suppose even the great-greats here (attention Paul, JimPee, Volney,
Else, Moylan, Athel, Lodder, Occam, Alsing, whodat, Roachie etc.)may
work out that from the above math formula.
Done.
Your explanation?
Bertietaylor 's formula "If A is atomic weight and N is atomic number
then the number
of electrons E holding the N protons in the nucleus is
E = A - N
Now E may not be an integer. That indicates the electrons for a
particular atom nucleus do not have unit charge on the average."
Atomic weight 238.05078 Atomic number 92 Number of electrons holding the
92 protons in the nucleus is E = 238.05078 - 92 = 146.05078
So there are 146.05078 electrons "to tighten up the 92 protons in the nucleus."
But according to Bertitaylor there are 146 other protons in the nucleus.
What are holding these protons together?