• Re: Bertietaylor 's formula

    From Paul.B.Andersen@relativity@paulba.no to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.usage.english on Sat Jul 5 15:10:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Den 02.07.2025 03:30, skrev Bertitaylor:
    Now for example U238 is far more stable than U235.
    Okay? One reason is that the U238 has 3 more electrons to tighten up the
    same 92 protons in the nucleus so that makes radioactive decay less.
    This comes from the use of Bertietaylor's formula E=A-N.

    Bertietaylor 's formula
    "If A is atomic weight and N is atomic number then the number
    of electrons E holding the N protons in the nucleus is
    E = A - N
    Now E may not be an integer. That indicates the electrons for a
    particular atom nucleus do not have unit charge on the average."

    Atomic weight 238.05078
    Atomic number 92
    Number of electrons holding the 92 protons in the nucleus is
    E = 238.05078 - 92 = 146.05078

    So there are 146.05078 electrons "to tighten up the 92 protons
    in the nucleus."

    But according to Bertitaylor there are 146 other protons in the nucleus.
    What are holding these protons together?


    I suppose even the great-greats here (attention Paul, JimPee, Volney,
    Else, Moylan, Athel, Lodder, Occam, Alsing, whodat, Roachie etc.)may
    work out that from the above math formula.

    Done.

    Your explanation?
    --
    Paul

    https://paulba.no/
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From bertietaylor@bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.usage.english on Sat Jul 5 13:52:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 13:10:54 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

    Den 02.07.2025 03:30, skrev Bertitaylor:
    Now for example U238 is far more stable than U235.
    Okay? One reason is that the U238 has 3 more electrons to tighten up the
    same 92 protons in the nucleus so that makes radioactive decay less.
    This comes from the use of Bertietaylor's formula E=A-N.

    Bertietaylor 's formula
    "If A is atomic weight and N is atomic number then the number
    of electrons E holding the N protons in the nucleus is
    E = A - N
    Now E may not be an integer. That indicates the electrons for a
    particular atom nucleus do not have unit charge on the average."

    Atomic weight 238.05078
    Atomic number 92
    Number of electrons holding the 92 protons in the nucleus is
    E = 238.05078 - 92 = 146.05078

    So there are 146.05078 electrons "to tighten up the 92 protons
    in the nucleus."

    No, there are 146 electrons to tighten up the 238 protons in the
    nucleus.
    For uranium 235 there are 235-92=143 electrons to tighten up 235
    protons.
    So for U238 the electron to proton ratio is 146:238 or 0.6134453
    For U235 the electron to proton ratio is 143:235 or 0.6085106
    So the tightening is more for U238 which makes it less radioactive than
    U235 and that is well known.

    But according to Bertitaylor there are 146 other protons in the nucleus.
    What are holding these protons together?

    146 electrons are holding together 238 protons in the nucleus of U238.
    Just as one electron holds two protons together in deuterium.

    When a neutron is understood as an electron-proton pair, both charges
    retaining their individuality despite the closest intranuclear
    distancing, then we grasp the basics of nuclear science on the basis of
    the proton-electron-aether-electric field nature of the universe.

    Woof woof woof woof

    Bertietaylor


    I suppose even the great-greats here (attention Paul, JimPee, Volney,
    Else, Moylan, Athel, Lodder, Occam, Alsing, whodat, Roachie etc.)may
    work out that from the above math formula.

    Done.

    Your explanation?


    --
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Deangelo Kalabukhov@ob@keoue.ru to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Sat Jul 5 18:34:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.physics.relativity

    Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

    Bertietaylor 's formula "If A is atomic weight and N is atomic number
    then the number
    of electrons E holding the N protons in the nucleus is
    E = A - N
    Now E may not be an integer. That indicates the electrons for a
    particular atom nucleus do not have unit charge on the average."

    Atomic weight 238.05078 Atomic number 92 Number of electrons holding the
    92 protons in the nucleus is E = 238.05078 - 92 = 146.05078

    So there are 146.05078 electrons "to tighten up the 92 protons in the nucleus."

    But according to Bertitaylor there are 146 other protons in the nucleus.
    What are holding these protons together?

    we really do like your tensors, how you put it and so on

    A Huge VICTORY for PUTIN┃The True Reason for the US surrendering
    UKRAINE to RUSSIA Has Been REVEALED https://www.bi%74%63%68%75te.com/v%69%64%65o/8TEOAGpTZzEq
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2