From Newsgroup: sci.physics




Iran is replacing GPS with BeiDou of course :)


A top military commander said they have fully completed the task and
machinery to immediately block Strait of Hormoz. He didn't say anything
about Militia's plans about it.

So even if the Militia refuses (or for some reason disabled) to do so, military can do it with a single notice.


Again in some other area of Iran authorities are telling people when
they hear large explosions they should not worry, because they are
conducting military and defense training :)

So looks like nobody is indolent anymore in the government and the
defense institutions. Hehe :)

They're getting ready fast.


There's been a dilemma for Iran's policing herself in general for some
time, and this matter is if not the only reason behind enemies'
accessing private information about various commanders and high rank
officials in Iran, then at least it is a major factor in revealing such
vital information along with possible human espionage.

This dilemma is about, on one hand preventing criminals from performing
money laundering and other criminal activities, and on the other hand
leaving too many sensitive information about high rank people in too few centers of control, thus providing cheap and easy ways for the enemies
to hack them and/or access all that.

And what I've once in a while come across about it is that they're just whining about it and have not solved this matter. Today somebody again
whined about this.

I'm talking about a span of about 10 years. 10 years back, they didn't
know how to handle this matter, and now after suffering from it in the
war, they still don't know what to do about it.. That's not acceptable. That's how Iran's government used to blow decade after decade in doing
nothing but staying in a perpetual state of inaction about problems. I
thought that form of Iran was over.

So no, that form of Iran is not fully over. There are still authorities
who're not doing their jobs. Willingly or unwillingly, doesn't matter.
They have failed to do their jobs, and they are still in those
positions. I'm not sure where exactly the problem is and why the system
cannot repair itself. I can only guess and this is not a matter in which guesses would mean anything. One must know where the problem is,
otherwise there's something gravely wrong with the system.

My suggestion: Have a team of scientists / experts find what solutions
USA, or Russia, or China, or India, or Israel, or a typical European
country has found for this "dilemma." Then see if you could make
modifications to it to make it work better for Iranians. This, for a government, shouldn't take more than a few months.

So this simple way out of it could've been tried 10 years back, but it obviously hasn't been tried. I still see authorities and their men
whining about it.

Get rid of those who did not and could not do it! Fire them. If the body responsible doesn't even exist, create it and then immediately do it.

This is my suggestion. The easy solution. The harder one is of course to create a system of policing all by yourselves from zero up where such a dilemma would naturally not exist.

But are you the man for it?








--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics

On 7/14/25 15:47, Physfitfreak wrote:

...

You know, regardless of whether you are in or
from the middle east or not, I would be of the
mind that your life could be much improved if
you quit praying to the demon box (watching TV).

In a lot of ways this could be a lot worse than
habitually praying to the porcelain goddess
(drinking vast amounts of alcohol and puking
in the toilet).

...

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics

On 7/15/25 2:13 AM, x wrote:

On 7/14/25 15:47, Physfitfreak wrote:

...

You know, regardless of whether you are in or
from the middle east or not, I would be of the
mind that your life could be much improved if
you quit praying to the demon box (watching TV).

In a lot of ways this could be a lot worse than
habitually praying to the porcelain goddess
(drinking vast amounts of alcohol and puking
in the toilet).

...

OK, so you describe it that way. Now, how do you describe your being a
groupie of Physfit's dick?



--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics




SCO was created for countries who are not on the Nazis' side to discuss
their issues and find ways to _cooperate_ to solve them. That "C" in the middle of the acronym stands for Cooperation.

It is being held in Shanghai right now, and Araghchi is attending to ask
the big paper tigers why they're so inactive against Nazis and minding
their own businesses as long as selling and buying stuff to and from
Nazis and paying not too much tariffs are concerned. This will come up,
but is not the main reason for his participation of course.

I've done it before here, but even I cannot find it anymore in the sea
of stuff I'm blogged here. So let me briefly go over a few features of
SCO once more.

Just like BRICS, I think and believe that, the significance of SCO is
only in coming together of little countries around the world for such discussions, and not in China's and/or Russia's or India's presence
there. These huge entities feel safe and are greedy enough to keep
things as it is for little countries while they are profiting from
Nazis. They're totally useless, to be honest.

Well, the three mentioned nations describe their own disloyalty to SCO
and fickleness by insisting that one of the foundation principles of SCO
is "balance", and by that word they mean maintaining relations with
Nazis. This is their excuse. So they admit what they are, and what
they're doing is not helping SCO, but have an excuse for it.

Useless. That's what they are.

I say it for the nth time since it got created around the turn of the
century, that the big guys there are insignificant. The significance of
SCO is in little countries participating in it ONLY.

These smaller countries are the ones who help each other under SCO's principles, and that includes counter-terrorism assistance, regional stability, some degree of intelligence sharing, providing economic connectivity, and, if you can believe it, _using_ the big fat paper
tigers in creating a safe zone against Nazis.

THAT's the significance of SCO, not the big fat useless members presence
in there.

And I repeat (I've said it at least 5 or 6 times before) that SCO does
not have direct military assistance in its nature. It is no "NATO", so
to speak.

But it goes a long way just the way it is. And only for the little
countries in there. For the big fat useless ones it is as good as nothing.

Another unique feature of SCO is that it "leaves no child behind", so to speak. In voting for a decision for some directive, even one negative
vote from any member country will veto that decision and directive. So
it is no "UN" that's so ridiculously at the disposal of only 5 or 6
countries in the world.

UN is an abomination against human's dignity. Switzerland, as long as it
could still maintain a spirit of self-reliance and dignity, avoided
membership in UN. But by early this century Switzerland had fallen and
had lost that spirit (read that as: it became Bitch of USA) and joined UN.

So this unique feature in SCO means that the "C", the Cooperation, is
limited to only what can be done for every and all member's benefit. It
does not sacrifice some to benefit others. It is no UN, so to speak.


A lot is included in what I described in SCO. A lot can be done, and is
being done! But again, almost entirely by the little member nations.
Just to give instances of that, look at:

- trading oil and gas
- sharing and creating markets (e.g. Central Asia, Silk Road, ..)
- providing bank services
- exchanges in science
- exchanges in education
- exchanges in tourism
- networking the member countries' universities
- ...


Even in Shah's time, some degree of cooperation between Iran and other
little countries were ongoing, cause it just made a lot of sense. I
still remember the absolute best teacher of Persian grammar we had in
our top high school. He was a very well-dressed, very quiet, tall, and dark-skinned Pakestani :-)

We _learned_ our own language's grammar perfectly well only because of
that Pakestani guy (and a superb text by a team of famous Iranian
Persian experts). He had some accent, and he pronounced some words in
its correct Persian form (and not in the strange Tehrani way of saying
them) but knew the subject like nobody I've seen after. Persian has
amazingly deep features that can be used to describe anything that needs description very closely and accurately. We Iranians do not take this
feature for granted. That's why Iran is so advanced in quality
literature. World-class, really.

Result? In the university entrance exams held in 1972, some 5 years
later, I could still score 100/100 in its definitive Persian language
test. "The hardest test" among all other tests in those exams. I was one
in five persons only, in those who ended up in Tehran University, who
got 100% of the subtle and difficult questions correctly!.. (in Physics
test of it I got the 4th place in those who got into Tehran University -
not nationally). And I owe my score in Persian to nobody but that
Pakestani teacher.

He (unfortunately I have forgotten his name) was part of an educational exchange program with Pakestan in 1960s :-)

Pakestanis love Iran, mainly because they understand Persian and have
the exact same history that they share, and they can appreciate good
Persian literature. Pakestan _was_ Iran till 1872, when the British took
her away from Iran.

So SCO is effective, believe me. But really only to little nations. The
big ones don't need anything at all. If they say otherwise, they're
speaking out of their asses. They're fine as things are today and their
heads are indeed up their own asses.






--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics

On 7/15/25 11:57 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:

SCO was created for countries who are not on the Nazis' side to discuss their issues and find ways to _cooperate_ to solve them. That "C" in the middle of the acronym stands for Cooperation.

It is being held in Shanghai right now, and Araghchi is attending to ask
the big paper tigers why they're so inactive against Nazis and minding
their own businesses as long as selling and buying stuff to and from
Nazis and paying not too much tariffs are concerned. This will come up,
but is not the main reason for his participation of course.

I've done it before here, but even I cannot find it anymore in the sea
of stuff I'm blogged here. So let me briefly go over a few features of
SCO once more.

Just like BRICS, I think and believe that, the significance of SCO is
only in coming together of little countries around the world for such discussions, and not in China's and/or Russia's or India's presence
there. These huge entities feel safe and are greedy enough to keep
things as it is for little countries while they are profiting from
Nazis. They're totally useless, to be honest.

Well, the three mentioned nations describe their own disloyalty to SCO
and fickleness by insisting that one of the foundation principles of SCO
is "balance", and by that word they mean maintaining relations with
Nazis. This is their excuse. So they admit what they are, and what
they're doing is not helping SCO, but have an excuse for it.

Useless. That's what they are.

I say it for the nth time since it got created around the turn of the century, that the big guys there are insignificant. The significance of
SCO is in little countries participating in it ONLY.

These smaller countries are the ones who help each other under SCO's principles, and that includes counter-terrorism assistance, regional stability, some degree of intelligence sharing, providing economic connectivity, and, if you can believe it, _using_ the big fat paper
tigers in creating a safe zone against Nazis.

THAT's the significance of SCO, not the big fat useless members presence
in there.

And I repeat (I've said it at least 5 or 6 times before) that SCO does
not have direct military assistance in its nature. It is no "NATO", so
to speak.

But it goes a long way just the way it is. And only for the little
countries in there. For the big fat useless ones it is as good as nothing.

Another unique feature of SCO is that it "leaves no child behind", so to speak. In voting for a decision for some directive, even one negative
vote from any member country will veto that decision and directive. So
it is no "UN" that's so ridiculously at the disposal of only 5 or 6 countries in the world.

UN is an abomination against human's dignity. Switzerland, as long as it could still maintain a spirit of self-reliance and dignity, avoided membership in UN. But by early this century Switzerland had fallen and
had lost that spirit (read that as: it became Bitch of USA) and joined UN.

So this unique feature in SCO means that the "C", the Cooperation, is limited to only what can be done for every and all member's benefit. It
does not sacrifice some to benefit others. It is no UN, so to speak.

A lot is included in what I described in SCO. A lot can be done, and is being done! But again, almost entirely by the little member nations.
Just to give instances of that, look at:

- trading oil and gas
- sharing and creating markets (e.g. Central Asia, Silk Road, ..)
- providing bank services
- exchanges in science
- exchanges in education
- exchanges in tourism
- networking the member countries' universities
- ...

Even in Shah's time, some degree of cooperation between Iran and other little countries were ongoing, cause it just made a lot of sense. I
still remember the absolute best teacher of Persian grammar we had in
our top high school. He was a very well-dressed, very quiet, tall, and dark-skinned Pakestani :-)

We _learned_ our own language's grammar perfectly well only because of
that Pakestani guy (and a superb text by a team of famous Iranian
Persian experts). He had some accent, and he pronounced some words in
its correct Persian form (and not in the strange Tehrani way of saying
them) but knew the subject like nobody I've seen after. Persian has amazingly deep features that can be used to describe anything that needs description very closely and accurately. We Iranians do not take this feature for granted. That's why Iran is so advanced in quality
literature. World-class, really.

Result? In the university entrance exams held in 1972, some 5 years
later, I could still score 100/100 in its definitive Persian language
test. "The hardest test" among all other tests in those exams. I was one
in five persons only, in those who ended up in Tehran University, who
got 100% of the subtle and difficult questions correctly!.. (in Physics
test of it I got the 4th place in those who got into Tehran University -
not nationally). And I owe my score in Persian to nobody but that
Pakestani teacher.

He (unfortunately I have forgotten his name) was part of an educational exchange program with Pakestan in 1960s :-)

Pakestanis love Iran, mainly because they understand Persian and have
the exact same history that they share, and they can appreciate good
Persian literature. Pakestan _was_ Iran till 1872, when the British took
her away from Iran.

So SCO is effective, believe me. But really only to little nations. The
big ones don't need anything at all. If they say otherwise, they're
speaking out of their asses. They're fine as things are today and their heads are indeed up their own asses.

World is getting smaller.

North Korea said today that next attack on Iran will be considered by
North Korea a security threat to Asia and will trigger response from
North Korea.

They also said that the era of creating "local wars" doesn't exist anymore.

They mean what they're saying. They sent troops to fight alongside
Russians against Ukraine. In the case of Israel and Iran, though, troops
might not be the best choice of cooperation with Iran.

I think Korea has come a long way since 1980s to help Russia in that way
now. Back then they wouldn't supply Iran with missiles (Scud). Iran
asked and never got it directly from them. It was Libya which lent 8
Scuds to Iran, 6 of which Iran used immediately to hit Baghdad with,
which contributed very much in Saddam's stopping to hit Tehran with
missiles. Libya in turn purchased 8 more from North Korea.

The remaining 2 after using 6 of them were reversed engineered and
turned into improved 1st generation Shahab-1 :) They were short range
and very inaccurate, good only to make it somewhere to the city where
the target was :) Hehe :) But they had a mighty one ton payloads!.. They
did deliver effective messages to Saddam. Hitting Iran with missiles completely stopped.

But despite their shortcomings, they were still a bit better than what
Libya gave Iran. I believe they traveled about 100 km farther. So
instead of taking Scuds to the border right under Iraqi's noses to fire
them, Shahab-1 could be fired from hidden places inside a city or
village or something in safer places. So Shahab-1 was indeed a good improvement.

Anyway, I do not remember Korea giving Iran Scuds despite the fact that
the Leader (he was president back then) traveled to Korea in person to
ask for them. And I remember Hafez Assad only offered training on their
usages but could not give a few to Iran, stating that Soviets didn't
allow it. Syrians had the original scuds from Russia, which weren't
called Scuds. Russian originals were called R-11. And Russians called
Iranian Shahab-1 slight variation as R-17 Elbrus (the Elbrus pointing to Iran's Alborz stretch of mountains).

And NATO of course had their own jargon for each of these missiles.

So.. . If Iran is attacked again in this day and age, North Korea might
do more than what they did 40 years back. Therefore I think what they
said today is significant.




--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics

On 7/15/25 9:00 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:

On 7/15/25 11:57 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:

SCO was created for countries who are not on the Nazis' side to
discuss their issues and find ways to _cooperate_ to solve them. That
"C" in the middle of the acronym stands for Cooperation.

It is being held in Shanghai right now, and Araghchi is attending to
ask the big paper tigers why they're so inactive against Nazis and
minding their own businesses as long as selling and buying stuff to
and from Nazis and paying not too much tariffs are concerned. This
will come up, but is not the main reason for his participation of course.

I've done it before here, but even I cannot find it anymore in the sea
of stuff I'm blogged here. So let me briefly go over a few features of
SCO once more.

Just like BRICS, I think and believe that, the significance of SCO is
only in coming together of little countries around the world for such
discussions, and not in China's and/or Russia's or India's presence
there. These huge entities feel safe and are greedy enough to keep
things as it is for little countries while they are profiting from
Nazis. They're totally useless, to be honest.

Well, the three mentioned nations describe their own disloyalty to SCO
and fickleness by insisting that one of the foundation principles of
SCO is "balance", and by that word they mean maintaining relations
with Nazis. This is their excuse. So they admit what they are, and
what they're doing is not helping SCO, but have an excuse for it.

Useless. That's what they are.

I say it for the nth time since it got created around the turn of the
century, that the big guys there are insignificant. The significance
of SCO is in little countries participating in it ONLY.

These smaller countries are the ones who help each other under SCO's
principles, and that includes counter-terrorism assistance, regional
stability, some degree of intelligence sharing, providing economic
connectivity, and, if you can believe it, _using_ the big fat paper
tigers in creating a safe zone against Nazis.

THAT's the significance of SCO, not the big fat useless members
presence in there.

And I repeat (I've said it at least 5 or 6 times before) that SCO does
not have direct military assistance in its nature. It is no "NATO", so
to speak.

But it goes a long way just the way it is. And only for the little
countries in there. For the big fat useless ones it is as good as
nothing.

Another unique feature of SCO is that it "leaves no child behind", so
to speak. In voting for a decision for some directive, even one
negative vote from any member country will veto that decision and
directive. So it is no "UN" that's so ridiculously at the disposal of
only 5 or 6 countries in the world.

UN is an abomination against human's dignity. Switzerland, as long as
it could still maintain a spirit of self-reliance and dignity, avoided
membership in UN. But by early this century Switzerland had fallen and
had lost that spirit (read that as: it became Bitch of USA) and joined
UN.

So this unique feature in SCO means that the "C", the Cooperation, is
limited to only what can be done for every and all member's benefit.
It does not sacrifice some to benefit others. It is no UN, so to speak.


A lot is included in what I described in SCO. A lot can be done, and
is being done! But again, almost entirely by the little member
nations. Just to give instances of that, look at:

- trading oil and gas
- sharing and creating markets (e.g. Central Asia, Silk Road, ..)
- providing bank services
- exchanges in science
- exchanges in education
- exchanges in tourism
- networking the member countries' universities
- ...


Even in Shah's time, some degree of cooperation between Iran and other
little countries were ongoing, cause it just made a lot of sense. I
still remember the absolute best teacher of Persian grammar we had in
our top high school. He was a very well-dressed, very quiet, tall, and
dark-skinned Pakestani :-)

We _learned_ our own language's grammar perfectly well only because of
that Pakestani guy (and a superb text by a team of famous Iranian
Persian experts). He had some accent, and he pronounced some words in
its correct Persian form (and not in the strange Tehrani way of saying
them) but knew the subject like nobody I've seen after. Persian has
amazingly deep features that can be used to describe anything that
needs description very closely and accurately. We Iranians do not take
this feature for granted. That's why Iran is so advanced in quality
literature. World-class, really.

Result? In the university entrance exams held in 1972, some 5 years
later, I could still score 100/100 in its definitive Persian language
test. "The hardest test" among all other tests in those exams. I was
one in five persons only, in those who ended up in Tehran University,
who got 100% of the subtle and difficult questions correctly!.. (in
Physics test of it I got the 4th place in those who got into Tehran
University - not nationally). And I owe my score in Persian to nobody
but that Pakestani teacher.

He (unfortunately I have forgotten his name) was part of an
educational exchange program with Pakestan in 1960s :-)

Pakestanis love Iran, mainly because they understand Persian and have
the exact same history that they share, and they can appreciate good
Persian literature. Pakestan _was_ Iran till 1872, when the British
took her away from Iran.

So SCO is effective, believe me. But really only to little nations.
The big ones don't need anything at all. If they say otherwise,
they're speaking out of their asses. They're fine as things are today
and their heads are indeed up their own asses.

World is getting smaller.

North Korea said today that next attack on Iran will be considered by
North Korea a security threat to Asia and will trigger response from
North Korea.

They also said that the era of creating "local wars" doesn't exist anymore.

They mean what they're saying. They sent troops to fight alongside
Russians against Ukraine. In the case of Israel and Iran, though, troops might not be the best choice of cooperation with Iran.

I think Korea has come a long way since 1980s to help Russia in that way now. Back then they wouldn't supply Iran with missiles (Scud). Iran
asked and never got it directly from them. It was Libya which lent 8
Scuds to Iran, 6 of which Iran used immediately to hit Baghdad with,
which contributed very much in Saddam's stopping to hit Tehran with missiles. Libya in turn purchased 8 more from North Korea.

The remaining 2 after using 6 of them were reversed engineered and
turned into improved 1st generation Shahab-1 :) They were short range
and very inaccurate, good only to make it somewhere to the city where
the target was :) Hehe :) But they had a mighty one ton payloads!.. They
did deliver effective messages to Saddam. Hitting Iran with missiles completely stopped.

But despite their shortcomings, they were still a bit better than what
Libya gave Iran. I believe they traveled about 100 km farther. So
instead of taking Scuds to the border right under Iraqi's noses to fire them, Shahab-1 could be fired from hidden places inside a city or
village or something in safer places. So Shahab-1 was indeed a good improvement.

Anyway, I do not remember Korea giving Iran Scuds despite the fact that
the Leader (he was president back then) traveled to Korea in person to
ask for them. And I remember Hafez Assad only offered training on their usages but could not give a few to Iran, stating that Soviets didn't
allow it. Syrians had the original scuds from Russia, which weren't
called Scuds. Russian originals were called R-11. And Russians called Iranian Shahab-1 slight variation as R-17 Elbrus (the Elbrus pointing to Iran's Alborz stretch of mountains).

And NATO of course had their own jargon for each of these missiles.

So.. . If Iran is attacked again in this day and age, North Korea might
do more than what they did 40 years back. Therefore I think what they
said today is significant.

I have no doubt why North Korea is doing this. They've come to the same understanding as Iran has come for at least 15 years. They now know,
that if they do not stop Nazis somewhere inside or close to where Nazis
are, one day they'd have to fight them inside North Korea. This is what
Nazis are, and many people in the world do not know that. I think even
China and India do not know that. They do not understand Nazis, yet.

This does not mean they do not help fighting them when things get
critical for their allies. They do. They do rarely go that far, and only
that far. But they aren't being directly threatened by the Nazis
presently. So they're not doing anything about them in "peace" time, so
to speak.

But I think Iran will have North Koreans' backing. Again, it is a matter
of little guys and big guys. Other friends can later include Pakestan
and Afghanestan. This of course does not include secret backing of Iran
by big guys like China and perhaps even India when things get really tough.

Russia is out, as they're pro-Israel. Their only use for Iran is in
bartering mundane equipment with Iran in days of reciprocal need, but
never stuff that they think Iran will for sure use to gravely hurt
Israel. China (and perhaps even India) is different. China is not
pro-Israel in the same fanatical way as Russia is. China can help you
kill Israelis if needed, and they might even do it themselves.

I have a hunch this actually happened in this 12 day war.

Do you remember that I posted here something right before the start of
the so-called "surprise" war, that several Chinese aircraft had begun
flying toward Iran? These fighter jets entered Iran's eastern air space, sometimes turning their ADSB equipment on, and sometimes keeping them
off. The enthusiasts who detect and follow air traffic began spotting
them from day 3 into the war and on, but intermittently. This is when
all the missiles had started to be launched from only the eastern parts
of Iran because many of the western parts' launchers where hit by
Israelis jets (be it most of them were just decoys). But Iran stayed
capable of launching missiles from the eastern part till the end of the
war!

Those who noticed this (several admins in telegram news sources) were of
the opinion that the reason for that was nothing but Israeli planes not
having enough fuel to fly that far east. But this is bullshit. Iran's
radars on the western parts were also hit ("be it most of them were just decoys"), so all those planes that carried fuel for Israeli jets were
also inside Iran's west side. Israeli jets as far as fuel was concerned
could easily reach east Iran. Why didn't they bomb the launchers located
in eastern Iran?

I think the reason is that, Chinese fighter jets shot each and every one
of them that entered into eastern skies, with the exception of only one
or two which managed to bomb Mashhad. Israelis (i.e. Americans) must've
found out that they have to perform dogfights with Chinese jets first,
before being able to bomb and destroy the launchers on the east side, so
it dawned on them, for the fist time, that they cannot stop the flow of missiles from Iran to Israel no matter what they do. It would be as hard
as having literally an air war with China.

That's when Israel asked USA to stop the war.

I think this happened. So I think China helps when help is badly needed,
but since China herself does not feel threatened by Nazis, she's not as concerned about them as little nations and countries like Iran and North
Korea are.

But Russia?

As I described above, they did and have been doing exactly what I said
above. Since the end of the war, they've been sending two large military
cargo planes to Iran every 24 hours, accompanied by a few of Iran's
Tomcats and Mig-29s, who come in and empty their cargo and fly back to
Russia either empty or with something Iran is supplying them with.
Nobody knows what is being traded. But I bet my boots they're nothing
out of ordinary. I don't think they're uranium.

When Russians helped Iran with H-bomb know-how beginning in November of
2023 (This is what only I think - I have not seen even one Iranian or non-Iranian mentioning this) they were absolutely sure Iran would not
use them on Israel, but would only use them to create a mutual balance
with Israel, which enhances peace and in fact prevents a nuclear war.

That's why Russia did that. They did it for the sake of Israelis, not Iranians.

This isn't something only in my head. First off, when it began, I found
two obscure news sources mentioning that a large number of Iranian
scientists and engineers had gone to Moscow for "training" inside
Kurchatov Institute. This is all they said. The rest of it is nothing
but my own processing of that info. I have not seen anything about it
since then.

Anyway, my point is that Russians will NOT fight Israelis no matter
what, especially for Iran. Never! They never kill Israelis. They will
not help Iran fight Israelis effectively. What they did in that H-bomb
matter was only to protect Israel from a nuclear war, cause H-bombs can
do that. They can prevent nuclear wars. But China is a different beast.
She _can_ and I think did fight Israelis. China _would_ kill Israelis,
if Iran is seriously threatened by them.




--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.physics




Hoarding goods in Iran is illegal, and it is being widely practiced. The
vice president of Iran even pointed to it and explained how widely it is
being practiced, and yet government isn't doing much to stop them.

This is a good clue.

I think Pezeshkiyan is calling that "privatization" and believes and
enforces that government should not get in the ways of private goods companies. And his government follows him. And this has made hoarding practices even more widespread, resulting in jumping prices of staple
food items in Iran. Double, or even triple the price they had just a
couple of months back.

I suspected that Pezeshkiyan was part of the coup in the 12 day war. He
had recently seen president of Azerbaijan Republic just a few days
before the war began, and many of Israelis jets and drones entered Iran
from borders with Azerbaijan Republic.

And now his treating of hoarding goods, which is illegal, as part of
general "privatization", and the disastrous directions it is taking Iran
to, again, in my view, points to his intention to break the back of the so-called "ruling class".

But realities that go beyond guesses and if's and such, is that Iran now
has too large a nation to be governed weakly and inadequately. Problems
easily multiply and remove people's hopes, and is fast getting where
everyone is only thinking of himself.

In other words, Iran is getting problematic from root and up! She is
just too big and especially too difficult to be governed by a bunch of
crooks.

It's gotten so bad that there is now a major water shortage! You know,
the northern part of Iran gets more rain than Netherland gets, and yet Netherland sells more agricultural products than Iran's entire oil
industry sells. I think somewhere mentioned that the ratio is like 5
times more! So obviously there is gross mismanagement, if not plain coup
being undertaken.

Saddam, executed goods hoarders of Iraq. And he solved that problem in
that country. Iran is now leaving hoarders alone and calls it
privatization.

Things are beginning to look bad in Iran. Inflation is at least 30%. And again, government isn't doing anything about it. They're the same
people. Same people who are in the government of Pezeshkiyan, are also
the ones who hoard goods. Same people who raise the prices overnight,
are also in the government of Pezeshkiyan.

Anyway, they're really playing with fire. Something could happen.

Where are the Militia? They must be part of the hoarders as well!


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2