Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 27 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 43:39:50 |
Calls: | 631 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 1,187 |
D/L today: |
24 files (29,813K bytes) |
Messages: | 175,620 |
Den 21.08.2025 08:39, skrev Thomas Heger:
But 'transit time' wasn't mentioned neither!
Quite right.
Einstein never mentioned 'transit time' in his paper which was written
in German. https://paulba.no/paper/Electrodynamik.pdf
Einstein wrote:
"die "Zeit", welche das Licht braucht, um von A nach B zu gelangen"
and: "der "Zeit", welche es braucht, um von B nach A zu gelangen."
Translated to English:
"the rCLtimerCY required by light to travel from A to B"
and: "the rCLtimerCY it requires to travel from B to A.
Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
"the rCLtimerCY required by light to travel from A to B"
and: "the rCLtimerCY it requires to travel from B to A.
not true, it reveals the imbecile Einstine didnt know what propagation delay is.
This is so, because if you send a message like 'the present time afterthe
beep is 12:00:00 GMT' to a remote station (like e.g. the Moon'), the
signal will arrive there with a certain delay.
This delay would be measurable on either side, but only makes sense, ifclocks
one side serves as 'master clock' and the other station tunes their
to signal time plus delay.
Le 30/08/2025 |a 08:58, Thomas Heger a |-crit :
What A need is the *value* t_B observed by B.
But HOW should B send this value to A?
It doesn't matter. I told you: pigeon, e-mail, mail, sound, written on
piece of paper and thrown out. This is not a problem.
In order to do so A also need to uses t_A and t'_A. As both are values
that have been read on clock A before, there is no communication issues
here. Right?
Let's suppose that these values are:
t_A = 12:30:00 t'_A = 11:30:2.56444
Typo: t_A = 12:30:00 t'_A = 12:30:2.56444