From Newsgroup: sci.math

Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

Den 21.08.2025 08:39, skrev Thomas Heger:

But 'transit time' wasn't mentioned neither!

Quite right.
Einstein never mentioned 'transit time' in his paper which was written
in German. https://paulba.no/paper/Electrodynamik.pdf

Einstein wrote:
"die "Zeit", welche das Licht braucht, um von A nach B zu gelangen"
and: "der "Zeit", welche es braucht, um von B nach A zu gelangen."
Translated to English:
"the rCLtimerCY required by light to travel from A to B"
and: "the rCLtimerCY it requires to travel from B to A.

not true, it reveals the imbecile Einstine didnt know what propagation delay is. As light doesnt implies propagation delay nor "the time required". The gypsy khazar was an imbecile. Nor it was sabotage, as Norway never declared war to Russia, nor america, nor any in the collective_vest.

as such, it was terrorism, nato terrorism and state sponsored terrorism. Here we go with some proofs


BALTOPS22 (nato Baltic Operations 2022)
These countries will exercise a myriad of capabilities, demonstrating the inherent flexibility of maritime forces. Exercise scenarios include amphibious, gunnery, anti-submarine, air defense, and mine clearance operations, as well as explosive ordnance disposal, unmanned underwater and surface vehicle exercises, and medical responses.
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2023/06/baltops-2023-exercise-kicks-off-in-the-baltic-sea/
Participating nations include Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Sweden, T|+rkiye, the United Kingdom, and the United States.


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.math

Le 21/08/2025 |a 21:32, Samsath Bakalov a |-crit :

Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

"the rCLtimerCY required by light to travel from A to B"
and: "the rCLtimerCY it requires to travel from B to A.

False in point of view of A, and point of view of B.

Only for C, an transversal observer.

not true, it reveals the imbecile Einstine didnt know what propagation delay is.

Absolutely.

R.H.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.math

Thomas Heger wrote:

This is so, because if you send a message like 'the present time after

the

beep is 12:00:00 GMT' to a remote station (like e.g. the Moon'), the
signal will arrive there with a certain delay.

This delay would be measurable on either side, but only makes sense, if
one side serves as 'master clock' and the other station tunes their

clocks

to signal time plus delay.

idiot, the signal itself experience no time delay, that's instantaneous.
The only one experiencing the delay is the sender. It can count the delay
by counting ticks, if the receiver reflects back the signal. The receiver experience no delay, there is no dt, as you need a minimum of two
timestamps to make a dt.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.math

Python wrote:

Le 30/08/2025 |a 08:58, Thomas Heger a |-crit :

What A need is the *value* t_B observed by B.

But HOW should B send this value to A?

It doesn't matter. I told you: pigeon, e-mail, mail, sound, written on
piece of paper and thrown out. This is not a problem.

yet another idiot not undrestanding relativity, nor is familiar with
education and so on, not knowing that due effects, the signal changes,
time changes, not knowing the sent value it's impossible to adapt, making
the received value irrelevant.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.math

Python wrote:

In order to do so A also need to uses t_A and t'_A. As both are values
that have been read on clock A before, there is no communication issues
here. Right?

Let's suppose that these values are:

t_A = 12:30:00 t'_A = 11:30:2.56444

Typo: t_A = 12:30:00 t'_A = 12:30:2.56444

quit posting now, yourCOve earned enough for a Big Mack already, fucking imbecile.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2