• Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

    From Truman Agamov@rruaau@ar.ru to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Fri Jul 4 22:00:49 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    Bertitaylor wrote:

    I wanted to put GR and QM into a single framework and thought, that
    matter should be 'relative'.

    Matter is mass and mass is standardised by units that are absolute.

    idiot, matter is much more than mass. The mass is a property. A characteristic.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Chris M. Thomasson@chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Fri Jul 4 15:19:48 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    On 6/29/2025 3:16 AM, Bertitaylor wrote:
    On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 4:21:28 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 6/28/2025 7:49 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
    On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 2:04:58 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 6/27/2025 5:13 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 6:56:57 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 6/26/2025 11:40 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
    On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 5:47:10 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

    On 6/26/2025 10:37 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
    On 6/26/2025 8:47 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:23:35 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote: >>>>>>>>>>
    Den 26.06.2025 09:15, skrev bertitaylor:
    On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:30:27 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>
    In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:

    When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cold,
    then
    bang
    phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.



    Can you please explain Arindam's theory?

    Where does the radiated energy come from?

    Deuterium fission.


    Deuterium is stable, does not undergo radioactive decay, and >>>>>>>>>>>>> thus
    cannot
    undergo fission, crackpot.

    Fool, we are not talking about deuterium on Earth, decaying >>>>>>>>>>>> naturally.
    Things are different in the Sun's atmosphere. Lots of heat, >>>>>>>>>>>> radiation,
    charged particles, very dense there.

    And no deuterium is decaying, but a lot of deuterium nuclei are >>>>>>>>>>> fused
    to Helium.

    It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the >>>>>>>>>>>> hydrogen
    bombs
    on Earth.

    Good grief, what a gigantic blunder!

    Yes it was the most gigantic blunder to think that fusion at all >>>>>>>>>> happens.

    :-D

    It obviously is _fusion_ of H and T in a hydrogen bomb.

    Very not obviously. The fission of the deuterium nucleus (two >>>>>>>>>> protons
    held by one electron) creates extraordinary force creating great >>>>>>>>>> energies as produced by the stars.

    Fusion for stars? fission to to kick artificially kick of the >>>>>>>>> reaction.
    Or ICF or something.

    [...]

    several tanks with a metal hydride for different isotopes eof
    hydrogen.
    Stored...Ready for reaction.

    Won't work, you need lotsa intense gamma rays, high energy
    particles as
    well to disturb the two protons in the deuterium nucleus to fission >>>>>>> with
    snapping of the electron bond holding them together.

    Arindam has shown how to get energy from deuterium in controlled >>>>>>> style
    in his links. Very likely so called fusion approaches these days are >>>>>>> based upon deuterium fission.

    Once Einstein and Helmholtz are thrown out there is joy for future >>>>>>> generations.

    Woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

    Bertietaylor

    --

    Or a tank with a metal hydride in it holding say, stable hydrogen. >>>>>> Apply
    a little heat to it and it will release hydrogen? So, how stable
    would
    the tank be? Can we cut into it without it exploding?

    It should be stable if there was only hydrogen around. Anyway how is >>>>> this relevant to dark matter?

    Not sure. Sorry about that. Humm... Perhaps dark matter can be the
    underlying field scaffold?

    What is that? Are you going to hang or behead fields!? :)

    ;^)

    Fields are fun. Especially my experimental one. Its as if each field
    line is a potential path for a photon to travel on. They can get rather
    odd:

    Works when both field and photon strengths act on inverse square law.
    Thus the field lines and photon splits are infinite. Photon needs aether
    to exist.

    A field as a continuous entity that has infinite paths, or field lines,
    for a photon to ride along. The gravitational field makes these up in
    space, due the warping of space. Call it aether, or whatever. This
    fabric can be warped? Field lines are actually a decent way to help "visualize" the flow of the field. Then we can get into volumetrics. A
    photons path can be bent around things along its journey through space.
    If you take it as a fluid, then think of an eddy in a river. spiraling
    around. Or the way smoke acts in a room. It can create its own spirals,
    and dynamics. Just shooting the breeze here, try not to flame to to bad. :^)

    aether, fluid, I don't know. It sure seems to be an infinite continuous entity. The space itself, and how its warped and dynamic.

    Anyway, sorry.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2