• =?UTF-8?Q?Defeating_the_Tarski_Undefinability_Theorem_and_G=C3=B6de?= =?UTF-8?Q?l?=

    From olcott@polcott333@gmail.com to sci.logic,sci.math on Sat Oct 11 08:34:42 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    On 10/11/2025 5:02 AM, Mikko wrote:
    On 2025-10-10 15:02:34 +0000, olcott said:

    On 10/10/2025 3:58 AM, Mikko wrote:
    On 2025-10-09 13:25:56 +0000, olcott said:

    On 10/9/2025 6:12 AM, Mikko wrote:
    On 2025-10-09 03:10:56 +0000, olcott said:


    I have posited that it has always been a huge
    mistake that semantics was divided away from
    the syntax of every formal logic system since
    the syllogism. It is the root cause of the
    divergence of logic from correct reasoning.

    Logic has been shown to be useful. Your "correct reasoning" has not >>>>> been.

    Because no one knows about it.

    Much about it has been known for as long time as anyone can remember.

    That Tarski and G||del were wrong has been known
    for a long time? The actual truth is that Tarski
    and G||del have been presumed to be correct on the
    basis of false assumptions.

    Your "correct reasoning" was not invented by G||del or Tarski.


    Apparently the seed of my correct reasoning system
    was created by Saul Kripke.

    https://files.commons.gc.cuny.edu/wp-content/blogs.dir/1358/files/2019/04/Outline-of-a-Theory-of-Truth.pdf

    My system is simpler and may work a little
    differently. We start with basic facts of the
    world and only apply the single truth preserving
    operation of semantic logical entailment.

    Within such a system a Truth predicate always
    consistently works and the system is only
    incomplete in that it is limited to the set
    of human knowledge that can be expressed in
    language. New knowledge can be added at any time.
    --
    Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
    hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2