From Newsgroup: sci.math
Richard Hachel wrote:
Let's send a signal from point M, the midpoint of AB, to points A and B.
It is clear that for M, regardless of the time at which it assumes the
signal was received by the two other points, the two events tA and tB
would have been simultaneous. M doesn't know "when" they occurred, but
by no means you have the authority to assume that M lays at THAT
midpoint.
it knows "that they were, by definition, simultaneous FOR IT, since the distances MA and MB are equal."
error number two, there are no "definitions" possibly overthere. That's a
Law of Nature, built into the system.
try again
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2