| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 27 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 46:17:40 |
| Calls: | 632 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 1,187 |
| D/L today: |
24 files (29,813K bytes) |
| Messages: | 176,482 |
You may announce a sheep to be a "proper shark",
but it won't affect the real shark.
Samely, your "proper time" bullshit is not affecting the real time -
which is NOT a physical entity, but a cultural one, and remains
non-local and bound to Earth and Solar System.
May be ugly, but works; binding time to an observer and local Cs
radiation may be beautiful and symmetrical, but doesn't work.
You're setting the clocks to indicate TAI or UTC or something else, even
your dilating idiocy. You may call it a measurement or not, doesn't
matter. What matters is that it's not any mystical Song of Universe
imagined by your delusional religion, it's the outcome of what YOU want.
Den 15.09.2025 11:48, skrev Maciej Wo?niak:
You may announce a sheep to be a "proper shark",
but it won't affect the real shark.
Samely, your "proper time" bullshit is not
affecting the real time - which is NOT a
physical entity, but a cultural one, and
remains non-local and bound to Earth and
Solar System.
May be ugly, but works; binding time to
an observer and local Cs radiation may be
beautiful and symmetrical, but doesn't
work.
Tanks for your very wise lecture about time.
But it is something I don't understand,
so can you please enlighten me?
My questions are:
1. Can you measure "the real time"?
if yes:
2. How do you measure "the real time"?
Maciej Wo?niak wrote:
You're setting the clocks to indicate TAI or UTC or something else, even
your dilating idiocy. You may call it a measurement or not, doesn't
matter. What matters is that it's not any mystical Song of Universe
imagined by your delusional religion, it's the outcome of what YOU want.
i'm not so sure; it looks like you polaks are going to eat on each other, >this winter, like cacamerica in tunnels, while ago, heading into >cacapitalism.
that's what happens, my friend, wanting to destroy Russia.
... real time doesn't exist...
and numbers don't exist either.
... real time doesn't exist...
and numbers don't exist either.
On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 14:17:43 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen"
<relativity@paulba.no> wrote:
Den 15.09.2025 11:48, skrev Maciej Wo?niak:
You may announce a sheep to be a "proper shark",
but it won't affect the real shark.
Samely, your "proper time" bullshit is not
affecting the real time - which is NOT a
physical entity, but a cultural one, and
remains non-local and bound to Earth and
Solar System.
May be ugly, but works; binding time to
an observer and local Cs radiation may be
beautiful and symmetrical, but doesn't
work.
Tanks for your very wise lecture about time.
But it is something I don't understand,
so can you please enlighten me?
My questions are:
1. Can you measure "the real time"?
if yes:
2. How do you measure "the real time"?
It is much much easier to measure imaginary time then it is to measure
real time since real time doesn't exist...
and numbers don't exist either.
That is WHY there is no equation for real-time.
All numbers are imaginary...i
Numbers don't exist.
Anybody know what the real time is now?
On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 10:42:52 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 14:17:43 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen"
<relativity@paulba.no> wrote:
Den 15.09.2025 11:48, skrev Maciej Wo?niak:
You may announce a sheep to be a "proper shark",
but it won't affect the real shark.
Samely, your "proper time" bullshit is not
affecting the real time - which is NOT a
physical entity, but a cultural one, and
remains non-local and bound to Earth and
Solar System.
May be ugly, but works; binding time to
an observer and local Cs radiation may be
beautiful and symmetrical, but doesn't
work.
Tanks for your very wise lecture about time.
But it is something I don't understand,
so can you please enlighten me?
My questions are:
1. Can you measure "the real time"?
if yes:
2. How do you measure "the real time"?
It is much much easier to measure imaginary time then it is to measure
real time since real time doesn't exist...
and numbers don't exist either.
That is WHY there is no equation for real-time.
All numbers are imaginary...i
Numbers don't exist.
Anybody know what the real time is now?
Does anybody got the real time now????
i'm not so sure; it looks like you polaks are going to eat on each
other,
this winter, like cacamerica in tunnels, while ago, heading into >>cacapitalism.
that's what happens, my friend, wanting to destroy Russia.
the only good commie is a dead commie.
He thought that time could be measured with clocks!
Clocks have more important things to do than your childish "let's
explain" game.
You may accept this fact or not, it doesn't affect it, sorry, poor
trash.
On 9/19/2025 3:40 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
The important point is that GPS-time is _not_ updated with leap seconds
like UTC is.
It is true that you mixed them all and insisted that it's UTC which is
ruling GPS for a long time. You never had any clue about any subject
you're babbling about, still I managed to correct some of your minor
errors. As for the major ones - you're a stubborn in your ignorance
idiot dying hard for them.
Maciej Wo+|niak wrote:
On 9/19/2025 3:40 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
The important point is that GPS-time is _not_ updated with leap seconds
like UTC is.
It is true that you mixed them all and insisted that it's UTC which is
ruling GPS for a long time. You never had any clue about any subject
you're babbling about, still I managed to correct some of your minor
errors. As for the major ones - you're a stubborn in your ignorance
idiot dying hard for them.
you can't avoid farts flowing through the universe, and therefore you will think clocks synchronized, but you are not, and will never know, you
stupid kike.
On 9/19/2025 4:42 PM, Stefhen Maslanka wrote:
Maciej Wo+|niak wrote:
On 9/19/2025 3:40 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
The important point is that GPS-time is _not_ updated with leap seconds >>>> like UTC is.
It is true that you mixed them all and insisted that it's UTC which is
ruling GPS for a long time. You never had any clue about any subject
you're babbling about, still I managed to correct some of your minor
errors. As for the major ones - you're a stubborn in your ignorance
idiot dying hard for them.
you can't avoid farts flowing through the universe, and therefore you will >> think clocks synchronized, but you are not, and will never know, you
stupid kike.
You will think I don't know, but I will, and you
just don't know. "Knowledge" is a complicated term,
it definitely can surprise you.
Le 19/09/2025 |a 20:17, Maciej Wo+|niak a |-crit :
On 9/19/2025 4:42 PM, Stefhen Maslanka wrote:
Maciej Wo+|niak wrote:
On 9/19/2025 3:40 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
The important point is that GPS-time is _not_ updated with leap
seconds
like UTC is.
It is true that you mixed them all and insisted that it's UTC which is >>>> ruling GPS for a long time. You never had any clue about any subject
you're babbling about, still I managed to correct some of your minor
errors. As for the major ones-a - you're a stubborn in your ignorance
idiot-a dying hard for them.
you can't avoid farts flowing through the universe, and therefore you
will
think clocks synchronized, but you are not, and will never know, you
stupid kike.
You will think I don't know, but I will, and you
just don't know. "Knowledge" is a complicated term,
it definitely can surprise you.
This the best you can tonight Woz ?
Sheets and nurses will suffer...
On 9/19/2025 9:19 PM, Python wrote:
Le 19/09/2025 |a 20:17, Maciej Wo+|niak a |-crit :
On 9/19/2025 4:42 PM, Stefhen Maslanka wrote:
Maciej Wo+|niak wrote:
On 9/19/2025 3:40 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
The important point is that GPS-time is _not_ updated with leap
seconds
like UTC is.
It is true that you mixed them all and insisted that it's UTC which is >>>>> ruling GPS for a long time. You never had any clue about any subject >>>>> you're babbling about, still I managed to correct some of your minor >>>>> errors. As for the major ones-a - you're a stubborn in your ignorance >>>>> idiot-a dying hard for them.
you can't avoid farts flowing through the universe, and therefore you >>>> will
think clocks synchronized, but you are not, and will never know, you
stupid kike.
You will think I don't know, but I will, and you
just don't know. "Knowledge" is a complicated term,
it definitely can surprise you.
This the best you can tonight Woz ?
Best or not, I can this tonight, Pyt.
Sheets and nurses will suffer...
slander
noun [ C or U ]
uk /-esl+a-En.d+Or/ us /-esl|an.d+U/
a false spoken statement about someone that damages their reputation, or
the making of such a statement:
Or maybe
libel
noun [ C or U ]
uk /-ela+-.b+Ol/ us /-ela+-.b+Ol/
a piece of writing that contains bad and false things about a person:
Le 19/09/2025 |a 22:04, Maciej Wo+|niak a |-crit :
On 9/19/2025 9:19 PM, Python wrote:
Le 19/09/2025 |a 20:17, Maciej Wo+|niak a |-crit :
On 9/19/2025 4:42 PM, Stefhen Maslanka wrote:
Maciej Wo+|niak wrote:
On 9/19/2025 3:40 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
The important point is that GPS-time is _not_ updated with leap >>>>>>> seconds
like UTC is.
It is true that you mixed them all and insisted that it's UTC which is >>>>>> ruling GPS for a long time. You never had any clue about any subject >>>>>> you're babbling about, still I managed to correct some of your minor >>>>>> errors. As for the major ones-a - you're a stubborn in your ignorance >>>>>> idiot-a dying hard for them.
you can't avoid farts flowing through the universe, and therefore you >>>>> will
think clocks synchronized, but you are not, and will never know, you >>>>> stupid kike.
You will think I don't know, but I will, and you
just don't know. "Knowledge" is a complicated term,
it definitely can surprise you.
This the best you can tonight Woz ?
Best or not, I can this tonight, Pyt.
Sheets and nurses will suffer...
slander
noun [ C or U ]
uk /-esl+a-En.d+Or/ us /-esl|an.d+U/
a false spoken statement about someone that damages their reputation, or
the making of such a statement:
Or maybe
libel
noun [ C or U ]
uk /-ela+-.b+Ol/ us /-ela+-.b+Ol/
a piece of writing that contains bad and false things about a person:
| UTC is based on TAI, but since the rotation of the Earth | varies and
seems to slow down, leap seconds are inserted | as needed to (loosely)
keep UTC in sync with the solar mean | time at longitude 0.
| UTC is currently 27 seconds behind TAI.
Typo. UTC is currently 37 seconds behind TAI.
Paul B. Andersen wrote:
| UTC is based on TAI, but since the rotation of the Earth | varies and seems to slow down, leap seconds are inserted | as needed to (loosely)
keep UTC in sync with the solar mean | time at longitude 0.
| UTC is currently 27 seconds behind TAI.
Typo. UTC is currently 37 seconds behind TAI.
the rate is essential, not that they are in synch and lags behind. They
are not in synch.
Typo. UTC is currently 37 seconds behind TAI.
the rate is essential, not that they are in synch and lags behind. They
are not in synch.
Real scientists, and astronomers, and 19th century sea captains, already
knew that master clocks should not be synchronised.
It suffices to note the differences.
Phileas Fogg knew it too.
In fact that is all that TAI is: a periodically updated table of
differences, and of rate divergencies,
and a weighted average of them all.
(maintained by BIPM)
That said, TAI -37s is in sync with UTC, exactly, and by definition,
(until it becomes -38s)
Iow: there ain't no such thing as 'absolute time', which you couldHave you never used your wristwatch to measure the 'time' between two
eventually measure.
events?
(Like 'leaving home' and 'arrive at destination'.)
Was that 'time' measurable, or ain't there any such thing which you
could eventually measure?
Best English equivalent for meaning:
'When it rains, it pours'.
Applied to this forum: Crazy ideas rarely happen in isolation. Someone
with one crazy idea usually turns out to be a complete nutter.
J. J. Lodder wrote:
Best English equivalent for meaning:
'When it rains, it pours'.
Applied to this forum: Crazy ideas rarely happen in isolation. Someone
with one crazy idea usually turns out to be a complete nutter.