From Newsgroup: sci.math

Jim Pennino wrote:

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

<snip old crap>

i meant, what is the age of our sun..

4.567 +/- 0.003 billion years.

compare it with the age of the earth (or our earth)

4.54 +/- 0.05 billion years.

is it a photo finish? who won by a nose?

I wouldn't call a difference of 27,000,000 years "by a nose".

penninojim@yahoo.com

If you understand Relativity...by a nose would mean by a slim margin measurement of...Time.


But everyone knows the 'scientific community' tweaks the numbers based on bias confirmation science techniques.


Hollywood accounting they call it...
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.math

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

Jim Pennino wrote:

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

<snip old crap>

i meant, what is the age of our sun..

4.567 +/- 0.003 billion years.

compare it with the age of the earth (or our earth)

4.54 +/- 0.05 billion years.

is it a photo finish? who won by a nose?

I wouldn't call a difference of 27,000,000 years "by a nose".

penninojim@yahoo.com

If you understand Relativity...by a nose would mean by a slim margin measurement of...Time.

If you understand Relativity you know it is irrelevant to this
discussion.

<snip remaining idiocy>
--
penninojim@yahoo.com
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.math

On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 13:55:41 -0700, Jim Pennino
<jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> wrote:

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

Jim Pennino wrote:

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

<snip old crap>

i meant, what is the age of our sun..

4.567 +/- 0.003 billion years.

compare it with the age of the earth (or our earth)

4.54 +/- 0.05 billion years.

is it a photo finish? who won by a nose?

I wouldn't call a difference of 27,000,000 years "by a nose".

penninojim@yahoo.com

If you understand Relativity...by a nose would mean by a slim margin measurement of...Time.

If you understand Relativity you know it is irrelevant to this
discussion.

<snip remaining idiocy>

If you understand..."by a nose" it means:

'by a nose'
By an extremely short or slim margin (of distance, time, or another
measure).
https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/by+a+nose


Now, get out your tweak calculators
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.math

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 13:55:41 -0700, Jim Pennino
<jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> wrote:

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

Jim Pennino wrote:

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

<snip old crap>

i meant, what is the age of our sun..

4.567 +/- 0.003 billion years.

compare it with the age of the earth (or our earth)

4.54 +/- 0.05 billion years.

is it a photo finish? who won by a nose?

I wouldn't call a difference of 27,000,000 years "by a nose".

penninojim@yahoo.com

If you understand Relativity...by a nose would mean by a slim margin measurement of...Time.

If you understand Relativity you know it is irrelevant to this
discussion.

<snip remaining idiocy>

If you understand..."by a nose" it means:

'by a nose'
By an extremely short or slim margin (of distance, time, or another
measure).
https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/by+a+nose

And that has what to do with relativity?

So you concider 27,000,000 years a short amount of time?
--
penninojim@yahoo.com
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.math

Jim Pennino wrote:

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 13:55:41 -0700, Jim Pennino
<jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> wrote:

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

Jim Pennino wrote:

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

<snip old crap>

i meant, what is the age of our sun..

4.567 +/- 0.003 billion years.

compare it with the age of the earth (or our earth)

4.54 +/- 0.05 billion years.

is it a photo finish? who won by a nose?

I wouldn't call a difference of 27,000,000 years "by a nose".

penninojim@yahoo.com

If you understand Relativity...by a nose would mean by a slim margin measurement of...Time.

If you understand Relativity you know it is irrelevant to this >>discussion.

<snip remaining idiocy>

If you understand..."by a nose" it means:

'by a nose'
By an extremely short or slim margin (of distance, time, or another measure).
https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/by+a+nose

And that has what to do with relativity?

So you concider 27,000,000 years a short amount of time?

--
penninojim@yahoo.com

27,000,000 years is a fake number. It's a fake photo finish.

compare it with the age of the earth (or our earth)

is it a photo finish? who won by a nose?

i want to see the photo finish.


Now, God moved upon the face of the
waters of the earth and ...
then he 'prompt'; , Let there be light: and there was light.


The 'science community' is trying to move the order of events

"waters of the earth"
"Let there be Light"


to

"Let there be Light
"waters of the earth".

Here are clearly the 'order of events':

1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon
the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the
waters.

3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light

I mean, I understand the goal of the 'scientific community' is to
assasinate God so thst the Science guys want to rewrite creation...
but it ain't going to work.

There is no cure for 'In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.'.

And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon
the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the
waters.
And God said, Let there be light: and there was light


27,000,000 years is a fake number. And they know it.

It's Hollywood accounting.
It's cooking the books.

Ask the Math department. They get hired by people who want ot cook books all the time.


It is the sci.math department that comes up with tweaking 27,000,000 years to keep the horse up front.


You have a totem pole. The Jewish people are on top of that totem pole, and the rest of yous who are not Jewish are
under the top of the totem pole, isn't that correct??? The Jewish people are on top of that totem pole, isn't that correct?

Yous are not even allowed to answer that question, let alone ...ask it.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.math

On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 22:31:41 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

Jim Pennino wrote:

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 13:55:41 -0700, Jim Pennino
<jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> wrote:

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

Jim Pennino wrote:

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

<snip old crap>

i meant, what is the age of our sun..

4.567 +/- 0.003 billion years.

compare it with the age of the earth (or our earth)

4.54 +/- 0.05 billion years.

is it a photo finish? who won by a nose?

I wouldn't call a difference of 27,000,000 years "by a nose".

penninojim@yahoo.com

If you understand Relativity...by a nose would mean by a slim margin measurement of...Time.

If you understand Relativity you know it is irrelevant to this
discussion.

<snip remaining idiocy>

If you understand..."by a nose" it means:

'by a nose'
By an extremely short or slim margin (of distance, time, or another
measure).
https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/by+a+nose

And that has what to do with relativity?

So you concider 27,000,000 years a short amount of time?

--
penninojim@yahoo.com

27,000,000 years is a fake number. It's a fake photo finish.

compare it with the age of the earth (or our earth)

is it a photo finish? who won by a nose?

i want to see the photo finish.

Now, God moved upon the face of the
waters of the earth and ...
then he 'prompt'; , Let there be light: and there was light.

The 'science community' is trying to move the order of events

"waters of the earth"
"Let there be Light"

to

"Let there be Light
"waters of the earth".

Here are clearly the 'order of events':

1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon
the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the
waters.

3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light

I mean, I understand the goal of the 'scientific community' is to
assasinate God so thst the Science guys want to rewrite creation...
but it ain't going to work.

There is no cure for 'In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.'.

And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon
the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the
waters.
And God said, Let there be light: and there was light

27,000,000 years is a fake number. And they know it.

It's Hollywood accounting.
It's cooking the books.

Ask the Math department. They get hired by people who want ot cook books all the time.

It is the sci.math department that comes up with tweaking 27,000,000 years to keep the horse up front.

You have a totem pole. The Jewish people are on top of that totem pole, and the rest of yous who are not Jewish are
under the top of the totem pole, isn't that correct??? The Jewish people are on top of that totem pole, isn't that correct?

Yous are not even allowed to answer that question, let alone ...ask it.

27,000,000 years is a fake number. Ask the Math department.

Here is how it works:

They get a Math guy..
and they ask him,
"How much does 2 plus 2 equal?"

The Math guy pulls down the shade
and sez, "How much do you want it to equal?"

They say "Great! You're hired to work in our Science department!!"

The Math guy ask, "What do I gotta do?"


They say, take line number 2 and move it to number 3, and move line
number 3 to number 2.

2. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon
the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the
waters.

3. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light

27,000,000 years.

PUT IT IN ALL THE TEXTBOOKS!!!!


How about God equals Nothing?

A UNIVERSE FROM NOTHING, LOVE IT!!!


PUT IT IN ALL THE TEXTBOOKS!!!!
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.math

J. J. Lodder wrote:

Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:

Precision wouldn't help that much, because even the sharpest of all
telescopes cannot make the movement of distant stars faster. And for
geometrical reasons the angles to measure are very small, if the star
is millions of light years away.

See, you are ages behind the times,
and completely out of touch with reality as it is today.

Why don't you learn something about reality before you start making
stupid comments on it?

pardonne moise, you are talking about my

EYOeEYOu_EYO-EYOYEYOU_EYy+EYOREYO2EYOUEYOoEYOLEYOUEYOuEYO-_EYOeEYOuEYO-EYO-EYOUEYOo_EYOnEYOc_EYO-EYOYEYOU_EYOeEYOnEYO2EYOREYOuEYOL_EYOaEYOnEYOUEYOoEYONEYOUEYOoEYO?_EYOeEYOnEYOOEYOUEYOi

whereas the 'reality' is completely irrelevant. All you need is the
probability distribution of the quantum domain. That's the 'reality', like
it or not.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2