• +24 to -24 converter

    From john larkin@jl@glen--canyon.com to sci.electronics.design on Thu Oct 2 11:50:09 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    It worked, first time.

    That's the forced-PWM spread-spectrum version of that LMR38020
    high-voltage switcher chip. It sees 48 volts in that circuit.

    The spread-spectrum makes a serious amount of jitter, but it doesn't
    seem to make much noise on the -24 out. They must do some clever
    spectral shaping, vaguely something like 2nd order delta-sigma or
    something.

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/0igyxnngijt2tugyi1biv/ADwnYrtpZsn5AelMMja8Y0o?rlkey=a2hx2xharlb83dr9ccxst9jvq&dl=0

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Arie de Muijnck@noreply@ademu.nl to sci.electronics.design on Thu Oct 2 22:59:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 2025-10-02 20:50, john larkin wrote:
    It worked, first time.

    That's the forced-PWM spread-spectrum version of that LMR38020
    high-voltage switcher chip. It sees 48 volts in that circuit.

    The spread-spectrum makes a serious amount of jitter, but it doesn't
    seem to make much noise on the -24 out. They must do some clever
    spectral shaping, vaguely something like 2nd order delta-sigma or
    something.

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/0igyxnngijt2tugyi1biv/ADwnYrtpZsn5AelMMja8Y0o?rlkey=a2hx2xharlb83dr9ccxst9jvq&dl=0

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics

    That red feedback wire could pick up switching noise from the coil field. Better keep it away from the switch output wiring.

    Did you try teasing it, loaded, with slow rising input?
    I've blown some inverting circuits that way.

    Arie

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From ehsjr@ehsjr@verizon.net to sci.electronics.design on Thu Oct 2 17:39:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 10/2/2025 2:50 PM, john larkin wrote:
    It worked, first time.

    That's the forced-PWM spread-spectrum version of that LMR38020
    high-voltage switcher chip. It sees 48 volts in that circuit.

    The spread-spectrum makes a serious amount of jitter, but it doesn't
    seem to make much noise on the -24 out. They must do some clever
    spectral shaping, vaguely something like 2nd order delta-sigma or
    something.

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/0igyxnngijt2tugyi1biv/ADwnYrtpZsn5AelMMja8Y0o?rlkey=a2hx2xharlb83dr9ccxst9jvq&dl=0

    Nice. I wish I could dremel like you do!
    Ed


    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From john larkin@jl@glen--canyon.com to sci.electronics.design on Thu Oct 2 15:39:24 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On Thu, 2 Oct 2025 22:59:12 +0200, Arie de Muijnck <noreply@ademu.nl>
    wrote:

    On 2025-10-02 20:50, john larkin wrote:
    It worked, first time.

    That's the forced-PWM spread-spectrum version of that LMR38020
    high-voltage switcher chip. It sees 48 volts in that circuit.

    The spread-spectrum makes a serious amount of jitter, but it doesn't
    seem to make much noise on the -24 out. They must do some clever
    spectral shaping, vaguely something like 2nd order delta-sigma or
    something.

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/0igyxnngijt2tugyi1biv/ADwnYrtpZsn5AelMMja8Y0o?rlkey=a2hx2xharlb83dr9ccxst9jvq&dl=0

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics

    That red feedback wire could pick up switching noise from the coil field. >Better keep it away from the switch output wiring.

    Did you try teasing it, loaded, with slow rising input?
    I've blown some inverting circuits that way.

    Arie

    Take another look. I did some tuning.

    It runs much better at 800 KHz, and with some ESR in the
    output cap. It needs freeze spray to keep going, but there's no heat
    sinking on my proto board.

    After a lot of dumb finger-fumble incidents, I haven't blown the chip!

    That red wire doesn't seem to matter. That is a (semi) shielded
    inductor.

    I tried a slow powerup; seems OK. That chip has internal soft start.
    The input impedance of this switcher is negative, so it could
    theoretically cave the input supply on startup. I need to be careful
    about that.

    So far, so good.

    Thanks for the warnings.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From john larkin@jl@glen--canyon.com to sci.electronics.design on Thu Oct 2 15:45:35 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On Thu, 2 Oct 2025 17:39:54 -0400, ehsjr <ehsjr@verizon.net> wrote:

    On 10/2/2025 2:50 PM, john larkin wrote:
    It worked, first time.

    That's the forced-PWM spread-spectrum version of that LMR38020
    high-voltage switcher chip. It sees 48 volts in that circuit.

    The spread-spectrum makes a serious amount of jitter, but it doesn't
    seem to make much noise on the -24 out. They must do some clever
    spectral shaping, vaguely something like 2nd order delta-sigma or
    something.

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/0igyxnngijt2tugyi1biv/ADwnYrtpZsn5AelMMja8Y0o?rlkey=a2hx2xharlb83dr9ccxst9jvq&dl=0

    Nice. I wish I could dremel like you do!
    Ed


    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics

    I use a carbide dental burr, and a lot of practice. I'm naturally
    steady too, which really helps. The Mantis viewer helps a lot too.

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of
    tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From piglet@erichpwagner@hotmail.com to sci.electronics.design on Fri Oct 3 11:43:15 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of
    tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to slow his
    heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!
    --
    piglet
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From john larkin@jl@glen--canyon.com to sci.electronics.design on Fri Oct 3 06:25:36 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:43:15 -0000 (UTC), piglet
    <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of
    tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to slow his >heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!

    I already take beta blockers!

    I was awake and seeing everything going on (and talking to Dr S and
    the nurse) when he peeled the top layer of cells from my retina by
    hand with tiny tweezers. The nurse showed me the teeny tweezers
    afterwards and we discussed our favorite english literature. She's
    done the whole P&P Pemberly tour. I turned her onto Lord Peter and PG Wodehouse.

    Great light show.

    Mammalian retinas make no sense. They are built upside down, complex,
    fragile, and have entire layers that they don't need.

    I have a friend who got prostate cancer and paid a bunch extra to have
    robotic surgery, to remove the cancer but leave everything else
    working. Eventually robots will do the really delicate surgery.

    Got kids?

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From piglet@erichpwagner@hotmail.com to sci.electronics.design on Fri Oct 3 14:09:04 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:43:15 -0000 (UTC), piglet
    <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of
    tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to slow his
    heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!

    I already take beta blockers!

    I was awake and seeing everything going on (and talking to Dr S and
    the nurse) when he peeled the top layer of cells from my retina by
    hand with tiny tweezers. The nurse showed me the teeny tweezers
    afterwards and we discussed our favorite english literature. She's
    done the whole P&P Pemberly tour. I turned her onto Lord Peter and PG Wodehouse.

    Great light show.

    Mammalian retinas make no sense. They are built upside down, complex, fragile, and have entire layers that they don't need.

    I have a friend who got prostate cancer and paid a bunch extra to have robotic surgery, to remove the cancer but leave everything else
    working. Eventually robots will do the really delicate surgery.

    Got kids?

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    Yes, two daughters, vasectomy was after the last one was born but post vasectomy pain developed and was horrific. First doctor offered to strip
    out the nerves, I opted to fix the cause instead. Was awake though out the procedure under local.
    --
    piglet
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Edward Rawde@invalid@invalid.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Fri Oct 3 10:32:10 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:5pivdkdihugbp6ubbe7uoo6cr7p2j0h1vf@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:43:15 -0000 (UTC), piglet
    <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of
    tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to slow his >>heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!

    I already take beta blockers!

    I was awake and seeing everything going on (and talking to Dr S and
    the nurse) when he peeled the top layer of cells from my retina by
    hand with tiny tweezers. The nurse showed me the teeny tweezers
    afterwards and we discussed our favorite english literature. She's
    done the whole P&P Pemberly tour. I turned her onto Lord Peter and PG Wodehouse.

    Great light show.

    Mammalian retinas make no sense. They are built upside down, complex, fragile, and have entire layers that they don't need.

    They make perfect sense to me. Mine work fine.
    We're keeping an eye out for glaucoma as it runs in the family.


    I have a friend who got prostate cancer and paid a bunch extra to have robotic surgery, to remove the cancer but leave everything else
    working. Eventually robots will do the really delicate surgery.

    Got kids?

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jeroen Belleman@jeroen@nospam.please to sci.electronics.design on Fri Oct 3 17:03:42 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 10/3/25 16:32, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:5pivdkdihugbp6ubbe7uoo6cr7p2j0h1vf@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:43:15 -0000 (UTC), piglet
    <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of
    tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to slow his >>> heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!

    I already take beta blockers!

    I was awake and seeing everything going on (and talking to Dr S and
    the nurse) when he peeled the top layer of cells from my retina by
    hand with tiny tweezers. The nurse showed me the teeny tweezers
    afterwards and we discussed our favorite english literature. She's
    done the whole P&P Pemberly tour. I turned her onto Lord Peter and PG
    Wodehouse.

    Great light show.

    Mammalian retinas make no sense. They are built upside down, complex,
    fragile, and have entire layers that they don't need.

    They make perfect sense to me. Mine work fine.
    We're keeping an eye out for glaucoma as it runs in the family.


    Admit it's weird that the light-sensitive ends of the cells point
    *away* from the light, while the wiring runs over the side from
    which the light comes in. At one point, all these nerves have to
    get to the brain somehow, so there is a hole in the retina where
    everything has to pass through, causing a blind spot.

    This would have been a design blunder, if the eye had been
    designed.

    Jeroen Belleman

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Edward Rawde@invalid@invalid.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Fri Oct 3 11:42:04 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    "Jeroen Belleman" <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in message news:10booke$1rvv6$2@dont-email.me...
    On 10/3/25 16:32, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:5pivdkdihugbp6ubbe7uoo6cr7p2j0h1vf@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:43:15 -0000 (UTC), piglet
    <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of
    tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to slow his >>>> heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!

    I already take beta blockers!

    I was awake and seeing everything going on (and talking to Dr S and
    the nurse) when he peeled the top layer of cells from my retina by
    hand with tiny tweezers. The nurse showed me the teeny tweezers
    afterwards and we discussed our favorite english literature. She's
    done the whole P&P Pemberly tour. I turned her onto Lord Peter and PG
    Wodehouse.

    Great light show.

    Mammalian retinas make no sense. They are built upside down, complex,
    fragile, and have entire layers that they don't need.

    They make perfect sense to me. Mine work fine.
    We're keeping an eye out for glaucoma as it runs in the family.


    Admit it's weird that the light-sensitive ends of the cells point
    *away* from the light, while the wiring runs over the side from
    which the light comes in. At one point, all these nerves have to
    get to the brain somehow, so there is a hole in the retina where
    everything has to pass through, causing a blind spot.

    What you see is constructed by your brain.
    You think you see in full detail over your field of vision but your eyes don't, your brain does it.
    The brain finds it easy to paint out the blind spot.
    Keeping the wiring in place through one exit hole seems perfectly sensible to me.
    All the layers in the retina have a specific function.


    This would have been a design blunder, if the eye had been
    designed.

    Jeroen Belleman



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From john larkin@jl@glen--canyon.com to sci.electronics.design on Fri Oct 3 09:24:49 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 10:32:10 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
    <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:5pivdkdihugbp6ubbe7uoo6cr7p2j0h1vf@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:43:15 -0000 (UTC), piglet
    <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of
    tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to slow his >>>heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!

    I already take beta blockers!

    I was awake and seeing everything going on (and talking to Dr S and
    the nurse) when he peeled the top layer of cells from my retina by
    hand with tiny tweezers. The nurse showed me the teeny tweezers
    afterwards and we discussed our favorite english literature. She's
    done the whole P&P Pemberly tour. I turned her onto Lord Peter and PG
    Wodehouse.

    Great light show.

    Mammalian retinas make no sense. They are built upside down, complex,
    fragile, and have entire layers that they don't need.

    They make perfect sense to me. Mine work fine.
    We're keeping an eye out for glaucoma as it runs in the family.

    In other critters, the blood vessels are behind the retina and nail it
    to the back of the eyeball. Our blood vessels are on the inside and
    block light and do not attach the retina. As people get older and the
    vitreus thickens, a little shock can yank the retina off the back of
    the eyeball. Fortunately, that can usually be fixed these days and the
    retina can then be spot welded to keep it in place.

    Retina detatch is a common side effect of cataract surgery too.

    If this inverted design makes sense, I don't see why. Or how it would
    have evolved incrementally from its ancestor structures.


    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Edward Rawde@invalid@invalid.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Fri Oct 3 12:35:49 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:ictvdkdptv7825l4tpn370btjl6e6p19l3@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 10:32:10 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
    <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:5pivdkdihugbp6ubbe7uoo6cr7p2j0h1vf@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:43:15 -0000 (UTC), piglet
    <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of
    tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to slow his >>>>heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!

    I already take beta blockers!

    I was awake and seeing everything going on (and talking to Dr S and
    the nurse) when he peeled the top layer of cells from my retina by
    hand with tiny tweezers. The nurse showed me the teeny tweezers
    afterwards and we discussed our favorite english literature. She's
    done the whole P&P Pemberly tour. I turned her onto Lord Peter and PG
    Wodehouse.

    Great light show.

    Mammalian retinas make no sense. They are built upside down, complex,
    fragile, and have entire layers that they don't need.

    They make perfect sense to me. Mine work fine.
    We're keeping an eye out for glaucoma as it runs in the family.

    In other critters, the blood vessels are behind the retina and nail it
    to the back of the eyeball. Our blood vessels are on the inside and
    block light and do not attach the retina. As people get older and the
    vitreus thickens, a little shock can yank the retina off the back of
    the eyeball. Fortunately, that can usually be fixed these days and the
    retina can then be spot welded to keep it in place.

    Retina detatch is a common side effect of cataract surgery too.

    All perfectly true.


    If this inverted design makes sense, I don't see why. Or how it would
    have evolved incrementally from its ancestor structures.

    Nature has no need to make sense to us.



    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From KevinJ93@kevin_es@whitedigs.com to sci.electronics.design on Fri Oct 3 11:38:49 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 10/3/25 8:03 AM, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
    On 10/3/25 16:32, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message
    news:5pivdkdihugbp6ubbe7uoo6cr7p2j0h1vf@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:43:15 -0000 (UTC), piglet
    <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of
    tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to
    slow his
    heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!

    I already take beta blockers!

    I was awake and seeing everything going on (and talking to Dr S and
    the nurse) when he peeled the top layer of cells from my retina by
    hand with tiny tweezers. The nurse showed me the teeny tweezers
    afterwards and we discussed our favorite english literature. She's
    done the whole P&P Pemberly tour. I turned her onto Lord Peter and PG
    Wodehouse.

    Great light show.

    Mammalian retinas make no sense. They are built upside down, complex,
    fragile, and have entire layers that they don't need.

    They make perfect sense to me. Mine work fine.
    We're keeping an eye out for glaucoma as it runs in the family.


    Admit it's weird that the light-sensitive ends of the cells point
    *away* from the light, while the wiring runs over the side from
    which the light comes in. At one point, all these nerves have to
    get to the brain somehow, so there is a hole in the retina where
    everything has to pass through, causing a blind spot.

    This would have been a design blunder, if the eye had been
    designed.

    Jeroen Belleman


    Semiconductor imaging photosensors for cameras were first designed that
    way - front illuminated sensors.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jeroen Belleman@jeroen@nospam.please to sci.electronics.design on Fri Oct 3 21:07:36 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 10/3/25 17:42, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "Jeroen Belleman" <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in message news:10booke$1rvv6$2@dont-email.me...
    On 10/3/25 16:32, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:5pivdkdihugbp6ubbe7uoo6cr7p2j0h1vf@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:43:15 -0000 (UTC), piglet
    <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of >>>>>> tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to slow his >>>>> heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!

    I already take beta blockers!

    I was awake and seeing everything going on (and talking to Dr S and
    the nurse) when he peeled the top layer of cells from my retina by
    hand with tiny tweezers. The nurse showed me the teeny tweezers
    afterwards and we discussed our favorite english literature. She's
    done the whole P&P Pemberly tour. I turned her onto Lord Peter and PG
    Wodehouse.

    Great light show.

    Mammalian retinas make no sense. They are built upside down, complex,
    fragile, and have entire layers that they don't need.

    They make perfect sense to me. Mine work fine.
    We're keeping an eye out for glaucoma as it runs in the family.


    Admit it's weird that the light-sensitive ends of the cells point
    *away* from the light, while the wiring runs over the side from
    which the light comes in. At one point, all these nerves have to
    get to the brain somehow, so there is a hole in the retina where
    everything has to pass through, causing a blind spot.

    What you see is constructed by your brain.
    You think you see in full detail over your field of vision but your eyes don't, your brain does it.
    The brain finds it easy to paint out the blind spot.
    Keeping the wiring in place through one exit hole seems perfectly sensible to me.
    All the layers in the retina have a specific function.


    Sure, but I don't care how the brain hides the deficiencies, the
    thing is still backwards. It would have been so much easier if
    the wiring had been *behind* the layer of sensors. Better
    sensitivity, nothing in the way of the entering light and no
    blind spots.

    Jeroen Belleman

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Edward Rawde@invalid@invalid.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Fri Oct 3 15:43:38 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    "Jeroen Belleman" <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in message news:10bp6to$21rq6$2@dont-email.me...
    On 10/3/25 17:42, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "Jeroen Belleman" <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in message news:10booke$1rvv6$2@dont-email.me...
    On 10/3/25 16:32, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:5pivdkdihugbp6ubbe7uoo6cr7p2j0h1vf@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:43:15 -0000 (UTC), piglet
    <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of >>>>>>> tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to slow his
    heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!

    I already take beta blockers!

    I was awake and seeing everything going on (and talking to Dr S and
    the nurse) when he peeled the top layer of cells from my retina by
    hand with tiny tweezers. The nurse showed me the teeny tweezers
    afterwards and we discussed our favorite english literature. She's
    done the whole P&P Pemberly tour. I turned her onto Lord Peter and PG >>>>> Wodehouse.

    Great light show.

    Mammalian retinas make no sense. They are built upside down, complex, >>>>> fragile, and have entire layers that they don't need.

    They make perfect sense to me. Mine work fine.
    We're keeping an eye out for glaucoma as it runs in the family.


    Admit it's weird that the light-sensitive ends of the cells point
    *away* from the light, while the wiring runs over the side from
    which the light comes in. At one point, all these nerves have to
    get to the brain somehow, so there is a hole in the retina where
    everything has to pass through, causing a blind spot.

    What you see is constructed by your brain.
    You think you see in full detail over your field of vision but your eyes don't, your brain does it.
    The brain finds it easy to paint out the blind spot.
    Keeping the wiring in place through one exit hole seems perfectly sensible to me.
    All the layers in the retina have a specific function.


    Sure, but I don't care how the brain hides the deficiencies, the
    thing is still backwards. It would have been so much easier if
    the wiring had been *behind* the layer of sensors.

    Easier for who or what?
    Nature isn't a human camera maker.

    Better
    sensitivity,

    I can't find a recent article I read about why nature did it the way it did but attenuation
    of incoming light (so we don't have issues glancing at the sun) was one of them.

    nothing in the way of the entering light and no
    blind spots.

    Jeroen Belleman



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From john larkin@jl@glen--canyon.com to sci.electronics.design on Fri Oct 3 14:04:28 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:42:04 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
    <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    "Jeroen Belleman" <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in message news:10booke$1rvv6$2@dont-email.me...
    On 10/3/25 16:32, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:5pivdkdihugbp6ubbe7uoo6cr7p2j0h1vf@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:43:15 -0000 (UTC), piglet
    <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of >>>>>> tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to slow his >>>>> heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!

    I already take beta blockers!

    I was awake and seeing everything going on (and talking to Dr S and
    the nurse) when he peeled the top layer of cells from my retina by
    hand with tiny tweezers. The nurse showed me the teeny tweezers
    afterwards and we discussed our favorite english literature. She's
    done the whole P&P Pemberly tour. I turned her onto Lord Peter and PG
    Wodehouse.

    Great light show.

    Mammalian retinas make no sense. They are built upside down, complex,
    fragile, and have entire layers that they don't need.

    They make perfect sense to me. Mine work fine.
    We're keeping an eye out for glaucoma as it runs in the family.


    Admit it's weird that the light-sensitive ends of the cells point
    *away* from the light, while the wiring runs over the side from
    which the light comes in. At one point, all these nerves have to
    get to the brain somehow, so there is a hole in the retina where
    everything has to pass through, causing a blind spot.

    What you see is constructed by your brain.
    You think you see in full detail over your field of vision but your eyes don't, your brain does it.
    The brain finds it easy to paint out the blind spot.

    Fine, as long as there isn't a tiger or a motorcycle there.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joe Gwinn@joegwinn@comcast.net to sci.electronics.design on Fri Oct 3 17:48:27 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 21:07:36 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
    <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

    On 10/3/25 17:42, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "Jeroen Belleman" <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in message news:10booke$1rvv6$2@dont-email.me...
    On 10/3/25 16:32, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:5pivdkdihugbp6ubbe7uoo6cr7p2j0h1vf@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:43:15 -0000 (UTC), piglet
    <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of >>>>>>> tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to slow his
    heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!

    I already take beta blockers!

    I was awake and seeing everything going on (and talking to Dr S and
    the nurse) when he peeled the top layer of cells from my retina by
    hand with tiny tweezers. The nurse showed me the teeny tweezers
    afterwards and we discussed our favorite english literature. She's
    done the whole P&P Pemberly tour. I turned her onto Lord Peter and PG >>>>> Wodehouse.

    Great light show.

    Mammalian retinas make no sense. They are built upside down, complex, >>>>> fragile, and have entire layers that they don't need.

    They make perfect sense to me. Mine work fine.
    We're keeping an eye out for glaucoma as it runs in the family.


    Admit it's weird that the light-sensitive ends of the cells point
    *away* from the light, while the wiring runs over the side from
    which the light comes in. At one point, all these nerves have to
    get to the brain somehow, so there is a hole in the retina where
    everything has to pass through, causing a blind spot.

    What you see is constructed by your brain.
    You think you see in full detail over your field of vision but your eyes don't, your brain does it.
    The brain finds it easy to paint out the blind spot.
    Keeping the wiring in place through one exit hole seems perfectly sensible to me.
    All the layers in the retina have a specific function.


    Sure, but I don't care how the brain hides the deficiencies, the
    thing is still backwards. It would have been so much easier if
    the wiring had been *behind* the layer of sensors. Better
    sensitivity, nothing in the way of the entering light and no
    blind spots.

    It may be a bit more complex than that. The nerves have all the
    strength of jello, so it may be better to fix the sensors to something
    solid, so the alignment can remain fixed.

    Joe
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jeroen Belleman@jeroen@nospam.please to sci.electronics.design on Sat Oct 4 00:44:17 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 10/3/25 21:43, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "Jeroen Belleman" <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in message news:10bp6to$21rq6$2@dont-email.me...
    On 10/3/25 17:42, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "Jeroen Belleman" <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in message news:10booke$1rvv6$2@dont-email.me...
    On 10/3/25 16:32, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:5pivdkdihugbp6ubbe7uoo6cr7p2j0h1vf@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:43:15 -0000 (UTC), piglet
    <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of >>>>>>>> tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to slow his
    heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!

    I already take beta blockers!

    I was awake and seeing everything going on (and talking to Dr S and >>>>>> the nurse) when he peeled the top layer of cells from my retina by >>>>>> hand with tiny tweezers. The nurse showed me the teeny tweezers
    afterwards and we discussed our favorite english literature. She's >>>>>> done the whole P&P Pemberly tour. I turned her onto Lord Peter and PG >>>>>> Wodehouse.

    Great light show.

    Mammalian retinas make no sense. They are built upside down, complex, >>>>>> fragile, and have entire layers that they don't need.

    They make perfect sense to me. Mine work fine.
    We're keeping an eye out for glaucoma as it runs in the family.


    Admit it's weird that the light-sensitive ends of the cells point
    *away* from the light, while the wiring runs over the side from
    which the light comes in. At one point, all these nerves have to
    get to the brain somehow, so there is a hole in the retina where
    everything has to pass through, causing a blind spot.

    What you see is constructed by your brain.
    You think you see in full detail over your field of vision but your eyes don't, your brain does it.
    The brain finds it easy to paint out the blind spot.
    Keeping the wiring in place through one exit hole seems perfectly sensible to me.
    All the layers in the retina have a specific function.


    Sure, but I don't care how the brain hides the deficiencies, the
    thing is still backwards. It would have been so much easier if
    the wiring had been *behind* the layer of sensors.

    Easier for who or what?
    Nature isn't a human camera maker.

    Better
    sensitivity,

    I can't find a recent article I read about why nature did it the way it did but attenuation
    of incoming light (so we don't have issues glancing at the sun) was one of them.


    That's the typical post-hoc reasoning fallacy. That doesn't work.

    Jeroen Belleman

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jeroen Belleman@jeroen@nospam.please to sci.electronics.design on Sat Oct 4 00:46:08 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 10/3/25 23:48, Joe Gwinn wrote:
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 21:07:36 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
    <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

    On 10/3/25 17:42, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "Jeroen Belleman" <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in message news:10booke$1rvv6$2@dont-email.me...
    On 10/3/25 16:32, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:5pivdkdihugbp6ubbe7uoo6cr7p2j0h1vf@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:43:15 -0000 (UTC), piglet
    <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of >>>>>>>> tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to slow his
    heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!

    I already take beta blockers!

    I was awake and seeing everything going on (and talking to Dr S and >>>>>> the nurse) when he peeled the top layer of cells from my retina by >>>>>> hand with tiny tweezers. The nurse showed me the teeny tweezers
    afterwards and we discussed our favorite english literature. She's >>>>>> done the whole P&P Pemberly tour. I turned her onto Lord Peter and PG >>>>>> Wodehouse.

    Great light show.

    Mammalian retinas make no sense. They are built upside down, complex, >>>>>> fragile, and have entire layers that they don't need.

    They make perfect sense to me. Mine work fine.
    We're keeping an eye out for glaucoma as it runs in the family.


    Admit it's weird that the light-sensitive ends of the cells point
    *away* from the light, while the wiring runs over the side from
    which the light comes in. At one point, all these nerves have to
    get to the brain somehow, so there is a hole in the retina where
    everything has to pass through, causing a blind spot.

    What you see is constructed by your brain.
    You think you see in full detail over your field of vision but your eyes don't, your brain does it.
    The brain finds it easy to paint out the blind spot.
    Keeping the wiring in place through one exit hole seems perfectly sensible to me.
    All the layers in the retina have a specific function.


    Sure, but I don't care how the brain hides the deficiencies, the
    thing is still backwards. It would have been so much easier if
    the wiring had been *behind* the layer of sensors. Better
    sensitivity, nothing in the way of the entering light and no
    blind spots.

    It may be a bit more complex than that. The nerves have all the
    strength of jello, so it may be better to fix the sensors to something
    solid, so the alignment can remain fixed.

    Joe

    Well, there are animals that have it the right way around, and
    their vision appears to work at least as well.

    Jeroen Belleman
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Edward Rawde@invalid@invalid.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Fri Oct 3 20:24:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:ege0ekpv5g21d4elgupfce9i4ss1lm3t5i@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:42:04 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
    <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    "Jeroen Belleman" <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in message news:10booke$1rvv6$2@dont-email.me...
    On 10/3/25 16:32, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:5pivdkdihugbp6ubbe7uoo6cr7p2j0h1vf@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:43:15 -0000 (UTC), piglet
    <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of >>>>>>> tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to slow his
    heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!

    I already take beta blockers!

    I was awake and seeing everything going on (and talking to Dr S and
    the nurse) when he peeled the top layer of cells from my retina by
    hand with tiny tweezers. The nurse showed me the teeny tweezers
    afterwards and we discussed our favorite english literature. She's
    done the whole P&P Pemberly tour. I turned her onto Lord Peter and PG >>>>> Wodehouse.

    Great light show.

    Mammalian retinas make no sense. They are built upside down, complex, >>>>> fragile, and have entire layers that they don't need.

    They make perfect sense to me. Mine work fine.
    We're keeping an eye out for glaucoma as it runs in the family.


    Admit it's weird that the light-sensitive ends of the cells point
    *away* from the light, while the wiring runs over the side from
    which the light comes in. At one point, all these nerves have to
    get to the brain somehow, so there is a hole in the retina where
    everything has to pass through, causing a blind spot.

    What you see is constructed by your brain.
    You think you see in full detail over your field of vision but your eyes don't, your brain does it.
    The brain finds it easy to paint out the blind spot.

    Fine, as long as there isn't a tiger or a motorcycle there.

    Is the tiger or motorcycle likely to be in the blind spot of both eyes?
    If you're moving and also the tiger/motorcycle are moving then the blind
    spot is clearly not an issue.


    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joe Gwinn@joegwinn@comcast.net to sci.electronics.design on Sat Oct 4 13:09:51 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On Sat, 4 Oct 2025 00:46:08 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
    <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

    On 10/3/25 23:48, Joe Gwinn wrote:
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 21:07:36 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
    <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

    On 10/3/25 17:42, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "Jeroen Belleman" <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in message news:10booke$1rvv6$2@dont-email.me...
    On 10/3/25 16:32, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:5pivdkdihugbp6ubbe7uoo6cr7p2j0h1vf@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:43:15 -0000 (UTC), piglet
    <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of >>>>>>>>> tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to slow his
    heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!

    I already take beta blockers!

    I was awake and seeing everything going on (and talking to Dr S and >>>>>>> the nurse) when he peeled the top layer of cells from my retina by >>>>>>> hand with tiny tweezers. The nurse showed me the teeny tweezers
    afterwards and we discussed our favorite english literature. She's >>>>>>> done the whole P&P Pemberly tour. I turned her onto Lord Peter and PG >>>>>>> Wodehouse.

    Great light show.

    Mammalian retinas make no sense. They are built upside down, complex, >>>>>>> fragile, and have entire layers that they don't need.

    They make perfect sense to me. Mine work fine.
    We're keeping an eye out for glaucoma as it runs in the family.


    Admit it's weird that the light-sensitive ends of the cells point
    *away* from the light, while the wiring runs over the side from
    which the light comes in. At one point, all these nerves have to
    get to the brain somehow, so there is a hole in the retina where
    everything has to pass through, causing a blind spot.

    What you see is constructed by your brain.
    You think you see in full detail over your field of vision but your eyes don't, your brain does it.
    The brain finds it easy to paint out the blind spot.
    Keeping the wiring in place through one exit hole seems perfectly sensible to me.
    All the layers in the retina have a specific function.


    Sure, but I don't care how the brain hides the deficiencies, the
    thing is still backwards. It would have been so much easier if
    the wiring had been *behind* the layer of sensors. Better
    sensitivity, nothing in the way of the entering light and no
    blind spots.

    It may be a bit more complex than that. The nerves have all the
    strength of jello, so it may be better to fix the sensors to something
    solid, so the alignment can remain fixed.

    Joe

    Well, there are animals that have it the right way around, and
    their vision appears to work at least as well.

    Yes, of course. But they do the details differently.

    And critters all optimize for their own world.

    Joe
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bill Sloman@bill.sloman@ieee.org to sci.electronics.design on Sun Oct 5 14:48:50 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 5/10/2025 4:09 am, Joe Gwinn wrote:
    On Sat, 4 Oct 2025 00:46:08 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
    <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

    On 10/3/25 23:48, Joe Gwinn wrote:
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 21:07:36 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
    <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

    On 10/3/25 17:42, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "Jeroen Belleman" <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in message news:10booke$1rvv6$2@dont-email.me...
    On 10/3/25 16:32, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:5pivdkdihugbp6ubbe7uoo6cr7p2j0h1vf@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:43:15 -0000 (UTC), piglet
    <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of >>>>>>>>>> tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to slow his
    heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!

    I already take beta blockers!

    I was awake and seeing everything going on (and talking to Dr S and >>>>>>>> the nurse) when he peeled the top layer of cells from my retina by >>>>>>>> hand with tiny tweezers. The nurse showed me the teeny tweezers >>>>>>>> afterwards and we discussed our favorite english literature. She's >>>>>>>> done the whole P&P Pemberly tour. I turned her onto Lord Peter and PG >>>>>>>> Wodehouse.

    Great light show.

    Mammalian retinas make no sense. They are built upside down, complex, >>>>>>>> fragile, and have entire layers that they don't need.

    They make perfect sense to me. Mine work fine.
    We're keeping an eye out for glaucoma as it runs in the family.


    Admit it's weird that the light-sensitive ends of the cells point
    *away* from the light, while the wiring runs over the side from
    which the light comes in. At one point, all these nerves have to
    get to the brain somehow, so there is a hole in the retina where
    everything has to pass through, causing a blind spot.

    What you see is constructed by your brain.
    You think you see in full detail over your field of vision but your eyes don't, your brain does it.
    The brain finds it easy to paint out the blind spot.
    Keeping the wiring in place through one exit hole seems perfectly sensible to me.
    All the layers in the retina have a specific function.


    Sure, but I don't care how the brain hides the deficiencies, the
    thing is still backwards. It would have been so much easier if
    the wiring had been *behind* the layer of sensors. Better
    sensitivity, nothing in the way of the entering light and no
    blind spots.

    It may be a bit more complex than that. The nerves have all the
    strength of jello, so it may be better to fix the sensors to something
    solid, so the alignment can remain fixed.

    Joe

    Well, there are animals that have it the right way around, and
    their vision appears to work at least as well.

    Yes, of course. But they do the details differently.

    And critters all optimize for their own world.

    Using the active voice is misleading. Random mutations mostly make their offspring less nearly optimal in their environment, but sometimes the
    change is for the better. It's a very wasteful way of adaption to the environment, but it does work.

    Intelligent design ought to work better, and we are now almost in a
    position to practice it, but intelligent designers are thin on the
    ground, and the woods are full of designers who think that they are intelligent.
    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jan Panteltje@alien@comet.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Sun Oct 5 09:10:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 5/10/2025 4:09 am, Joe Gwinn wrote:
    On Sat, 4 Oct 2025 00:46:08 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
    <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

    On 10/3/25 23:48, Joe Gwinn wrote:
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 21:07:36 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
    <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

    On 10/3/25 17:42, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "Jeroen Belleman" <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in message news:10booke$1rvv6$2@dont-email.me...
    On 10/3/25 16:32, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:5pivdkdihugbp6ubbe7uoo6cr7p2j0h1vf@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:43:15 -0000 (UTC), piglet
    <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of >>>>>>>>>>> tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to slow his
    heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!

    I already take beta blockers!

    I was awake and seeing everything going on (and talking to Dr S and >>>>>>>>> the nurse) when he peeled the top layer of cells from my retina by >>>>>>>>> hand with tiny tweezers. The nurse showed me the teeny tweezers >>>>>>>>> afterwards and we discussed our favorite english literature. She's >>>>>>>>> done the whole P&P Pemberly tour. I turned her onto Lord Peter and PG >>>>>>>>> Wodehouse.

    Great light show.

    Mammalian retinas make no sense. They are built upside down, complex, >>>>>>>>> fragile, and have entire layers that they don't need.

    They make perfect sense to me. Mine work fine.
    We're keeping an eye out for glaucoma as it runs in the family. >>>>>>>>

    Admit it's weird that the light-sensitive ends of the cells point >>>>>>> *away* from the light, while the wiring runs over the side from
    which the light comes in. At one point, all these nerves have to >>>>>>> get to the brain somehow, so there is a hole in the retina where >>>>>>> everything has to pass through, causing a blind spot.

    What you see is constructed by your brain.
    You think you see in full detail over your field of vision but your eyes don't, your brain does it.
    The brain finds it easy to paint out the blind spot.
    Keeping the wiring in place through one exit hole seems perfectly sensible to me.
    All the layers in the retina have a specific function.


    Sure, but I don't care how the brain hides the deficiencies, the
    thing is still backwards. It would have been so much easier if
    the wiring had been *behind* the layer of sensors. Better
    sensitivity, nothing in the way of the entering light and no
    blind spots.

    It may be a bit more complex than that. The nerves have all the
    strength of jello, so it may be better to fix the sensors to something >>>> solid, so the alignment can remain fixed.

    Joe

    Well, there are animals that have it the right way around, and
    their vision appears to work at least as well.

    Yes, of course. But they do the details differently.

    And critters all optimize for their own world.

    Using the active voice is misleading. Random mutations mostly make their >offspring less nearly optimal in their environment, but sometimes the
    change is for the better. It's a very wasteful way of adaption to the >environment, but it does work.

    Intelligent design ought to work better, and we are now almost in a
    position to practice it, but intelligent designers are thin on the
    ground, and the woods are full of designers who think that they are >intelligent.

    There are interesting series on German TV about science.
    Yesterday it was about origins of life and scientific experiments done and being done realated to that.

    They went into the function 'smell' in finding a suitable partner, and showed experiments.
    If I understood it correctly the female system gets half of its geome replaced by the male genome after pairing.
    To find a genome that creates diversity (is not the same as partner) people and animals (if there is a differnce at all ;-) )
    use small.
    The did genome tests, and blind tests having males smell for female blankets they liked best and that confirmed it.
    Always a person with a different genome was selected.
    This ensures in evolution that the system to counter 'attacks' (biologically, virusses, microbes, etc)
    is added to that of the female's, and so to the kids, making those stronger through diversity.
    Was also about chemistry, very nice series.
    Recorded it.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bill Sloman@bill.sloman@ieee.org to sci.electronics.design on Sun Oct 5 20:40:19 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 5/10/2025 8:10 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On 5/10/2025 4:09 am, Joe Gwinn wrote:
    On Sat, 4 Oct 2025 00:46:08 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
    <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

    On 10/3/25 23:48, Joe Gwinn wrote:
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 21:07:36 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
    <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

    On 10/3/25 17:42, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "Jeroen Belleman" <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in message news:10booke$1rvv6$2@dont-email.me...
    On 10/3/25 16:32, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:5pivdkdihugbp6ubbe7uoo6cr7p2j0h1vf@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:43:15 -0000 (UTC), piglet
    <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of
    tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to slow his
    heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!

    I already take beta blockers!

    I was awake and seeing everything going on (and talking to Dr S and >>>>>>>>>> the nurse) when he peeled the top layer of cells from my retina by >>>>>>>>>> hand with tiny tweezers. The nurse showed me the teeny tweezers >>>>>>>>>> afterwards and we discussed our favorite english literature. She's >>>>>>>>>> done the whole P&P Pemberly tour. I turned her onto Lord Peter and PG
    Wodehouse.

    Great light show.

    Mammalian retinas make no sense. They are built upside down, complex,
    fragile, and have entire layers that they don't need.

    They make perfect sense to me. Mine work fine.
    We're keeping an eye out for glaucoma as it runs in the family. >>>>>>>>>

    Admit it's weird that the light-sensitive ends of the cells point >>>>>>>> *away* from the light, while the wiring runs over the side from >>>>>>>> which the light comes in. At one point, all these nerves have to >>>>>>>> get to the brain somehow, so there is a hole in the retina where >>>>>>>> everything has to pass through, causing a blind spot.

    What you see is constructed by your brain.
    You think you see in full detail over your field of vision but your eyes don't, your brain does it.
    The brain finds it easy to paint out the blind spot.
    Keeping the wiring in place through one exit hole seems perfectly sensible to me.
    All the layers in the retina have a specific function.


    Sure, but I don't care how the brain hides the deficiencies, the
    thing is still backwards. It would have been so much easier if
    the wiring had been *behind* the layer of sensors. Better
    sensitivity, nothing in the way of the entering light and no
    blind spots.

    It may be a bit more complex than that. The nerves have all the
    strength of jello, so it may be better to fix the sensors to something >>>>> solid, so the alignment can remain fixed.

    Joe

    Well, there are animals that have it the right way around, and
    their vision appears to work at least as well.

    Yes, of course. But they do the details differently.

    And critters all optimize for their own world.

    Using the active voice is misleading. Random mutations mostly make their
    offspring less nearly optimal in their environment, but sometimes the
    change is for the better. It's a very wasteful way of adaption to the
    environment, but it does work.

    Intelligent design ought to work better, and we are now almost in a
    position to practice it, but intelligent designers are thin on the
    ground, and the woods are full of designers who think that they are
    intelligent.

    There are interesting series on German TV about science.
    Yesterday it was about origins of life and scientific experiments done and being done realated to that.

    They went into the function 'smell' in finding a suitable partner, and showed experiments.
    If I understood it correctly the female system gets half of its geome replaced by the male genome after pairing.
    To find a genome that creates diversity (is not the same as partner) people and animals (if there is a differnce at all ;-) )
    use smell.

    This has been done with humans too.

    The did genome tests, and blind tests having males smell for female blankets they liked best and that confirmed it.
    Always a person with a different genome was selected.

    That's not all that difficult, only identical twins have identical genomes.

    What the human tests showed up was the smell preferences lined up with difference in the genes that generated antibodies, so the selection was specifically aimed at producing off-spring who had the widest possible
    range of potential antibodies. Hardly anybody produces the same antibody
    when challenged by a foreign protein, and some antibodies work better
    than others.

    This ensures in evolution that the system to counter 'attacks' (biologically, virusses, microbes, etc)

    It's called the immune system.

    is added to that of the female's, and so to the kids, making those
    stronger through diversity.

    Half the males immune system is added to the half the kids inherits from
    the female, which creates it's own diversity

    Was also about chemistry, very nice series.

    But not great at getting complex ideas across to unsophisticated viewers.
    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jan Panteltje@alien@comet.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Sun Oct 5 10:30:17 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 5/10/2025 8:10 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On 5/10/2025 4:09 am, Joe Gwinn wrote:
    On Sat, 4 Oct 2025 00:46:08 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
    <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

    On 10/3/25 23:48, Joe Gwinn wrote:
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 21:07:36 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
    <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

    On 10/3/25 17:42, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "Jeroen Belleman" <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in message news:10booke$1rvv6$2@dont-email.me...
    On 10/3/25 16:32, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:5pivdkdihugbp6ubbe7uoo6cr7p2j0h1vf@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:43:15 -0000 (UTC), piglet
    <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of
    tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to slow his
    heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!

    I already take beta blockers!

    I was awake and seeing everything going on (and talking to Dr S and >>>>>>>>>>> the nurse) when he peeled the top layer of cells from my retina by >>>>>>>>>>> hand with tiny tweezers. The nurse showed me the teeny tweezers >>>>>>>>>>> afterwards and we discussed our favorite english literature. She's >>>>>>>>>>> done the whole P&P Pemberly tour. I turned her onto Lord Peter and PG
    Wodehouse.

    Great light show.

    Mammalian retinas make no sense. They are built upside down, complex,
    fragile, and have entire layers that they don't need.

    They make perfect sense to me. Mine work fine.
    We're keeping an eye out for glaucoma as it runs in the family. >>>>>>>>>>

    Admit it's weird that the light-sensitive ends of the cells point >>>>>>>>> *away* from the light, while the wiring runs over the side from >>>>>>>>> which the light comes in. At one point, all these nerves have to >>>>>>>>> get to the brain somehow, so there is a hole in the retina where >>>>>>>>> everything has to pass through, causing a blind spot.

    What you see is constructed by your brain.
    You think you see in full detail over your field of vision but your eyes don't, your brain does it.
    The brain finds it easy to paint out the blind spot.
    Keeping the wiring in place through one exit hole seems perfectly sensible to me.
    All the layers in the retina have a specific function.


    Sure, but I don't care how the brain hides the deficiencies, the >>>>>>> thing is still backwards. It would have been so much easier if
    the wiring had been *behind* the layer of sensors. Better
    sensitivity, nothing in the way of the entering light and no
    blind spots.

    It may be a bit more complex than that. The nerves have all the
    strength of jello, so it may be better to fix the sensors to something >>>>>> solid, so the alignment can remain fixed.

    Joe

    Well, there are animals that have it the right way around, and
    their vision appears to work at least as well.

    Yes, of course. But they do the details differently.

    And critters all optimize for their own world.

    Using the active voice is misleading. Random mutations mostly make their >>> offspring less nearly optimal in their environment, but sometimes the
    change is for the better. It's a very wasteful way of adaption to the
    environment, but it does work.

    Intelligent design ought to work better, and we are now almost in a
    position to practice it, but intelligent designers are thin on the
    ground, and the woods are full of designers who think that they are
    intelligent.

    There are interesting series on German TV about science.
    Yesterday it was about origins of life and scientific experiments done and being done realated to that.

    They went into the function 'smell' in finding a suitable partner, and showed experiments.
    If I understood it correctly the female system gets half of its geome replaced by the male genome after pairing.
    To find a genome that creates diversity (is not the same as partner) people and animals (if there is a differnce at all ;-) )
    use smell.

    This has been done with humans too.

    The did genome tests, and blind tests having males smell for female blankets they liked best and that confirmed it.
    Always a person with a different genome was selected.

    That's not all that difficult, only identical twins have identical genomes.

    What the human tests showed up was the smell preferences lined up with >difference in the genes that generated antibodies, so the selection was >specifically aimed at producing off-spring who had the widest possible
    range of potential antibodies. Hardly anybody produces the same antibody >when challenged by a foreign protein, and some antibodies work better
    than others.

    This ensures in evolution that the system to counter 'attacks' (biologically, virusses, microbes, etc)

    It's called the immune system.

    is added to that of the female's, and so to the kids, making those
    stronger through diversity.

    Half the males immune system is added to the half the kids inherits from
    the female, which creates it's own diversity

    Was also about chemistry, very nice series.

    But not great at getting complex ideas across to unsophisticated viewers.

    I was expecting your answer to be 'but panteltje knows nothing..'

    So you are improving
    I did not do any of those experiments except for the real life ones of course.

    Did you see the series while here (German TV reception was possiblele all over the NL
    started watching it in the sixties)?
    They went through the DNA stuff and also showed some recent experiments
    where the scientists predicted life would be recreated in the lab in a short time (few years?).
    Also had a nice piece about hemoglobin and how its structuree carries oxygen.

    https://www.3sat.de/wissen/terra-x/wunderwelt-chemie-die-bausteine-der-natur-mit-mai-thi-nguyen-kim-100.html
    https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Terra+X+wunderwelt+Chemie+youtube%3F
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bill Sloman@bill.sloman@ieee.org to sci.electronics.design on Sun Oct 5 23:54:23 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 5/10/2025 9:30 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On 5/10/2025 8:10 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On 5/10/2025 4:09 am, Joe Gwinn wrote:
    On Sat, 4 Oct 2025 00:46:08 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
    <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

    On 10/3/25 23:48, Joe Gwinn wrote:
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 21:07:36 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
    <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

    On 10/3/25 17:42, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "Jeroen Belleman" <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in message news:10booke$1rvv6$2@dont-email.me...
    On 10/3/25 16:32, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:5pivdkdihugbp6ubbe7uoo6cr7p2j0h1vf@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:43:15 -0000 (UTC), piglet
    <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of
    tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to slow his
    heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!

    I already take beta blockers!

    I was awake and seeing everything going on (and talking to Dr S and
    the nurse) when he peeled the top layer of cells from my retina by >>>>>>>>>>>> hand with tiny tweezers. The nurse showed me the teeny tweezers >>>>>>>>>>>> afterwards and we discussed our favorite english literature. She's >>>>>>>>>>>> done the whole P&P Pemberly tour. I turned her onto Lord Peter and PG
    Wodehouse.

    Great light show.

    Mammalian retinas make no sense. They are built upside down, complex,
    fragile, and have entire layers that they don't need.

    They make perfect sense to me. Mine work fine.
    We're keeping an eye out for glaucoma as it runs in the family. >>>>>>>>>>>

    Admit it's weird that the light-sensitive ends of the cells point >>>>>>>>>> *away* from the light, while the wiring runs over the side from >>>>>>>>>> which the light comes in. At one point, all these nerves have to >>>>>>>>>> get to the brain somehow, so there is a hole in the retina where >>>>>>>>>> everything has to pass through, causing a blind spot.

    What you see is constructed by your brain.
    You think you see in full detail over your field of vision but your eyes don't, your brain does it.
    The brain finds it easy to paint out the blind spot.
    Keeping the wiring in place through one exit hole seems perfectly sensible to me.
    All the layers in the retina have a specific function.


    Sure, but I don't care how the brain hides the deficiencies, the >>>>>>>> thing is still backwards. It would have been so much easier if >>>>>>>> the wiring had been *behind* the layer of sensors. Better
    sensitivity, nothing in the way of the entering light and no
    blind spots.

    It may be a bit more complex than that. The nerves have all the >>>>>>> strength of jello, so it may be better to fix the sensors to something >>>>>>> solid, so the alignment can remain fixed.

    Joe

    Well, there are animals that have it the right way around, and
    their vision appears to work at least as well.

    Yes, of course. But they do the details differently.

    And critters all optimize for their own world.

    Using the active voice is misleading. Random mutations mostly make their >>>> offspring less nearly optimal in their environment, but sometimes the
    change is for the better. It's a very wasteful way of adaption to the
    environment, but it does work.

    Intelligent design ought to work better, and we are now almost in a
    position to practice it, but intelligent designers are thin on the
    ground, and the woods are full of designers who think that they are
    intelligent.

    There are interesting series on German TV about science.
    Yesterday it was about origins of life and scientific experiments done and being done realated to that.

    They went into the function 'smell' in finding a suitable partner, and showed experiments.
    If I understood it correctly the female system gets half of its geome replaced by the male genome after pairing.
    To find a genome that creates diversity (is not the same as partner) people and animals (if there is a differnce at all ;-) )
    use smell.

    This has been done with humans too.

    The did genome tests, and blind tests having males smell for female blankets they liked best and that confirmed it.
    Always a person with a different genome was selected.

    That's not all that difficult, only identical twins have identical genomes. >>
    What the human tests showed up was the smell preferences lined up with
    difference in the genes that generated antibodies, so the selection was
    specifically aimed at producing off-spring who had the widest possible
    range of potential antibodies. Hardly anybody produces the same antibody
    when challenged by a foreign protein, and some antibodies work better
    than others.

    This ensures in evolution that the system to counter 'attacks'
    (biologically, virusses, microbes, etc)

    It's called the immune system.

    is added to that of the female's, and so to the kids, making those
    stronger through diversity.

    Half the males immune system is added to the half the kids inherits from
    the female, which creates it's own diversity

    Was also about chemistry, very nice series.

    But not great at getting complex ideas across to unsophisticated viewers.

    I was expecting your answer to be 'but panteltje knows nothing..'

    So you are improving.

    I wish i could say the same about you,

    I did not do any of those experiments except for the real life ones of course.

    Did you see the series while here (German TV reception was possiblele all over the NL
    started watching it in the sixties)?

    I watched Dutch TV and read Dutch newspapers to exercise my Dutch. My
    German was never that good - I could read German scientific papers, and
    had been doing that since I was an undergraduate, but that was pretty
    much my limit. My wife - whose German was as near perfect as an English speaker can manage - never watched German TV at home.

    Living in the Netherlands sorted of wrecked her German - before she had
    moved there and learned Dutch, Germans thought that she came from
    Bavaria, but after she'd learned Dutch they thought that she was a Dutch person whose German was almost perfect, much to her disgust.

    They went through the DNA stuff and also showed some recent experiments
    where the scientists predicted life would be recreated in the lab in a short time (few years?).
    Also had a nice piece about haemoglobin and how its structure carries oxygen.

    Max Perutz worked that out (in England) and it was indeed a brilliant
    piece of work. He got the Nobel Prize for it in 1962.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Perutz

    I now get that sort of information from New Scientist, to which I've had
    a subscription since the early 1980s.
    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From wmartin@wwm@wwmartin.net to sci.electronics.design on Sun Oct 5 22:45:30 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 10/3/25 17:24, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:ege0ekpv5g21d4elgupfce9i4ss1lm3t5i@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:42:04 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
    <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    "Jeroen Belleman" <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in message news:10booke$1rvv6$2@dont-email.me...
    On 10/3/25 16:32, Edward Rawde wrote:
    "john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:5pivdkdihugbp6ubbe7uoo6cr7p2j0h1vf@4ax.com...
    On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:43:15 -0000 (UTC), piglet
    <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

    john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

    I was talking to the guy who repaired my retina with a tiny pair of >>>>>>>> tweezers. We both hold our breath when we're carving.

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics


    I had a vasectomy reversal and the surgeon took beta blockers to slow his
    heart and made the stitches between heartbeats!

    I already take beta blockers!

    I was awake and seeing everything going on (and talking to Dr S and >>>>>> the nurse) when he peeled the top layer of cells from my retina by >>>>>> hand with tiny tweezers. The nurse showed me the teeny tweezers
    afterwards and we discussed our favorite english literature. She's >>>>>> done the whole P&P Pemberly tour. I turned her onto Lord Peter and PG >>>>>> Wodehouse.

    Great light show.

    Mammalian retinas make no sense. They are built upside down, complex, >>>>>> fragile, and have entire layers that they don't need.

    They make perfect sense to me. Mine work fine.
    We're keeping an eye out for glaucoma as it runs in the family.


    Admit it's weird that the light-sensitive ends of the cells point
    *away* from the light, while the wiring runs over the side from
    which the light comes in. At one point, all these nerves have to
    get to the brain somehow, so there is a hole in the retina where
    everything has to pass through, causing a blind spot.

    What you see is constructed by your brain.
    You think you see in full detail over your field of vision but your eyes don't, your brain does it.
    The brain finds it easy to paint out the blind spot.

    Fine, as long as there isn't a tiger or a motorcycle there.

    Is the tiger or motorcycle likely to be in the blind spot of both eyes?
    If you're moving and also the tiger/motorcycle are moving then the blind
    spot is clearly not an issue.


    I suspect that depends upon "proximity" :-)

    John Larkin
    Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
    Lunatic Fringe Electronics



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2