Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 26 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 53:40:30 |
Calls: | 632 |
Files: | 1,187 |
D/L today: |
27 files (19,977K bytes) |
Messages: | 178,640 |
Maybe people should post something electronic to SED once in a while.
This isn't very exciting, I admit.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/8rvu5s91nwha7zlblxgcb/B200_DAC_1.jpg?rlkey=8071q2dkcgjsbwewsyczrg4gg&raw=1
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/d8gqf6o2p16ixyu83cmk4/B200_Output_2.asc?rlkey=fdwnl07gv9aml6mjny1aao1id&dl=0
The challenge here is the dreadful DAC7822 data sheet. Data sheets
keep getting worse.
Maybe people should post something electronic to SED once in a while.
This isn't very exciting, I admit.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/8rvu5s91nwha7zlblxgcb/B200_DAC_1.jpg?rlkey=8071q2dkcgjsbwewsyczrg4gg&raw=1
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/d8gqf6o2p16ixyu83cmk4/B200_Output_2.asc?rlkey=fdwnl07gv9aml6mjny1aao1id&dl=0
The challenge here is the dreadful DAC7822 data sheet. Data sheets
keep getting worse.
Just downloaded that datasheet,
it has 'OBSOLETE' in big characters displayed on every one of the 12 pages. >Indeed a bit mysterious design, no application notes?
There must be other better? 16 bit DAC chips.
Maybe people should post something electronic to SED once in a while.
This isn't very exciting, I admit.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/8rvu5s91nwha7zlblxgcb/B200_DAC_1.jpg?rlkey=8071q2dkcgjsbwewsyczrg4gg&raw=1
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/d8gqf6o2p16ixyu83cmk4/B200_Output_2.asc?rlkey=fdwnl07gv9aml6mjny1aao1id&dl=0
The challenge here is the dreadful DAC7822 data sheet. Data sheets
keep getting worse.
John Larkin
Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
Lunatic Fringe Electronics
On Mon, 29 Sep 2025 16:02:35 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
Maybe people should post something electronic to SED once in a while.
This isn't very exciting, I admit.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/8rvu5s91nwha7zlblxgcb/B200_DAC_1.jpg?rlkey=8071q2dkcgjsbwewsyczrg4gg&raw=1
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/d8gqf6o2p16ixyu83cmk4/B200_Output_2.asc?rlkey=fdwnl07gv9aml6mjny1aao1id&dl=0
The challenge here is the dreadful DAC7822 data sheet. Data sheets
keep getting worse.
Just downloaded that datasheet,
it has 'OBSOLETE' in big characters displayed on every one of the 12 pages. >>Indeed a bit mysterious design, no application notes?
There must be other better? 16 bit DAC chips.
That's strange. I just reloaded the data sheet from TI and don't see
that.
This
https://www.ti.com/product/DAC7822#order-quality
says status is production+active.
I want to close a control loop inside an FPGA. This DAC is fast, and
the ADC3910S025 is fast. I could run both at 20 MHz.
On Mon, 29 Sep 2025 16:02:35 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>wrote:
Maybe people should post something electronic to SED once in a while.
This isn't very exciting, I admit.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/8rvu5s91nwha7zlblxgcb/B200_DAC_1.jpg?rlkey=8071q2dkcgjsbwewsyczrg4gg&raw=1
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/d8gqf6o2p16ixyu83cmk4/B200_Output_2.asc?rlkey=fdwnl07gv9aml6mjny1aao1id&dl=0
The challenge here is the dreadful DAC7822 data sheet. Data sheets
keep getting worse.
Just downloaded that datasheet,
it has 'OBSOLETE' in big characters displayed on every one of the 12 pages. >>>Indeed a bit mysterious design, no application notes?
There must be other better? 16 bit DAC chips.
That's strange. I just reloaded the data sheet from TI and don't see
that.
My error,
I typed DAC7822 in Chromium browser and it found this: >https://www.alldatasheet.com/datasheet-pdf/pdf/657266/AD/AD7882.html
This
https://www.ti.com/product/DAC7822#order-quality
says status is production+active.
OK, got that datasheet now, seems a normal R2R DA network, see figure 37.
I want to close a control loop inside an FPGA. This DAC is fast, and
the ADC3910S025 is fast. I could run both at 20 MHz.
I used a simpler 8 bit R2R network with normal resistors connected to my old FPPGA board for analog video output:
https://panteltje.nl/pub/FPGA_board_with_25MHz_VCXO_locked_to_rubidium_10MHz_reference_IMG_3724.GIF
Have not tried what the maximum speed is, but plenty for normal analog video.
On Mon, 29 Sep 2025 18:07:17 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2025 16:02:35 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>>wrote:
Maybe people should post something electronic to SED once in a while. >>>>>
This isn't very exciting, I admit.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/8rvu5s91nwha7zlblxgcb/B200_DAC_1.jpg?rlkey=8071q2dkcgjsbwewsyczrg4gg&raw=1
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/d8gqf6o2p16ixyu83cmk4/B200_Output_2.asc?rlkey=fdwnl07gv9aml6mjny1aao1id&dl=0
The challenge here is the dreadful DAC7822 data sheet. Data sheets >>>>>keep getting worse.
Just downloaded that datasheet,
it has 'OBSOLETE' in big characters displayed on every one of the 12 pages. >>>>Indeed a bit mysterious design, no application notes?
There must be other better? 16 bit DAC chips.
That's strange. I just reloaded the data sheet from TI and don't see >>>that.
My error,
I typed DAC7822 in Chromium browser and it found this: >>https://www.alldatasheet.com/datasheet-pdf/pdf/657266/AD/AD7882.html
This
https://www.ti.com/product/DAC7822#order-quality
says status is production+active.
OK, got that datasheet now, seems a normal R2R DA network, see figure 37.
The note above fig 41 is especially insightful. TI must use their
dumbest interns to write data sheets.
I want to close a control loop inside an FPGA. This DAC is fast, and
the ADC3910S025 is fast. I could run both at 20 MHz.
I used a simpler 8 bit R2R network with normal resistors connected to my old FPPGA board for analog video output:
https://panteltje.nl/pub/FPGA_board_with_25MHz_VCXO_locked_to_rubidium_10MHz_reference_IMG_3724.GIF
Have not tried what the maximum speed is, but plenty for normal analog video.
Analog video?
I have a prototype board now being built that has a small (efinix T20)
FPGA driving six discrete resistors to make a fast DAC, for a >direct-digital-synthsizer experiment.
I could buy a little R-2R network for production, if the idea works.
Maybe people should post something electronic to SED once in a while.
On 9/29/2025 11:07 AM, john larkin wrote:
Maybe people should post something electronic to SED once in a while.
ASCII schematics used to make it fun, especially when every post in a
thread had one.
That was even better than alt.binaries.schematics.electronic