• Incandescent lamps as sources of heat

    From Don Y@blockedofcourse@foo.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Sat Sep 27 10:33:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    I want to model a heat load. I'm assuming I can simulate about 90% of
    the power delivered into a 100W bulb as being thrown off as heat?
    This, a cheaper alternative to lots of high power resistive loads...
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From liz@liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) to sci.electronics.design on Sat Sep 27 19:09:02 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    I want to model a heat load. I'm assuming I can simulate about 90% of
    the power delivered into a 100W bulb as being thrown off as heat?
    This, a cheaper alternative to lots of high power resistive loads...

    Probably more than 90% - and the light will turn nto heat when it is
    absorbed by the walls and the contents of the room. You need to measure
    the voltage and the current because the resistance of a tungsten
    filament lamp increases greatly with temperature, so you can't make
    assumptions from just the voltage or the current alone.

    Industrial fan heaters also make good loads, I have used them as
    starters for a three-phase motor with a high inertia load (it took over
    45 seconds to run up to speed).
    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Martin Brown@'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk to sci.electronics.design on Sat Sep 27 19:27:10 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 27/09/2025 18:33, Don Y wrote:
    I want to model a heat load.-a I'm assuming I can simulate about 90% of
    the power delivered into a 100W bulb as being thrown off as heat?
    This, a cheaper alternative to lots of high power resistive loads...

    Electric fire bars are probably cheaper and much more robust for bigger
    loads. US 100v bulbs are a bit more efficient than UK 240v ones.

    I have used light bulbs as a heat source for terrariums.
    --
    Martin Brown

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From john larkin@jl@glen--canyon.com to sci.electronics.design on Sat Sep 27 11:32:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 10:33:58 -0700, Don Y
    <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    I want to model a heat load. I'm assuming I can simulate about 90% of
    the power delivered into a 100W bulb as being thrown off as heat?
    This, a cheaper alternative to lots of high power resistive loads...

    The ratio of light to heat goes up at lower voltages too.

    If you put a lamp in a box, no light escapes and 100% becomes heat.

    Incandescents are very nonlinear.

    What sorts of resistances and powers do you need?

    We make programmable electronic loads, resistive and constant-current
    and resistive+inductive.

    Some big mosfets on a heat sink can be an adjustable load,
    constant-current or constant-resistance. Add a bridge rectifier for
    AC.



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Don Y@blockedofcourse@foo.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Sat Sep 27 12:12:20 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 9/27/2025 11:27 AM, Martin Brown wrote:
    On 27/09/2025 18:33, Don Y wrote:
    I want to model a heat load.-a I'm assuming I can simulate about 90% of
    the power delivered into a 100W bulb as being thrown off as heat?
    This, a cheaper alternative to lots of high power resistive loads...

    Electric fire bars are probably cheaper and much more robust for bigger loads.

    What's a "fire bar"?

    US 100v bulbs are a bit more efficient than UK 240v ones.

    Bulbs are cheap. If I need to use 10% more of them, <shrug> I can put them
    on a rheostat and "tune" the actual power dissipated (as I don't care what happens to the light)

    I have used light bulbs as a heat source for terrariums.

    We use "XMAS lights" (strings of 25 x 9W lamps) on the citrus on winter nights. Not to keep the trees *warm* but, rather, to keep the air moving around them (air that settles on the leaves is COLDER than the surrounding air).

    [I've been looking for fans that are capable of being used in outdoor
    settings (think: rainfall) as they would be easier to deploy to
    protect such a large volume (~4000-8000 cu ft)]

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Don Y@blockedofcourse@foo.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Sat Sep 27 12:21:11 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 9/27/2025 11:09 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    I want to model a heat load. I'm assuming I can simulate about 90% of
    the power delivered into a 100W bulb as being thrown off as heat?
    This, a cheaper alternative to lots of high power resistive loads...

    Probably more than 90% - and the light will turn nto heat when it is
    absorbed by the walls and the contents of the room. You need to measure
    the voltage and the current because the resistance of a tungsten
    filament lamp increases greatly with temperature, so you can't make assumptions from just the voltage or the current alone.

    I will be controlling the power into the load. But, I need a (cheap)
    load that I can easily resize.

    Surfaces absorbing heat from light will tend (?) to do so slower than
    the radiated heat from the lamps' inefficiencies. (I don't want to have to "soak" for a long time to get a feel as to the temperature rise in the
    volume)

    Industrial fan heaters also make good loads, I have used them as
    starters for a three-phase motor with a high inertia load (it took over
    45 seconds to run up to speed).

    "Fan heater"? A ceramic heating element with forced air over it?
    Will it "melt" (degrade) if the forced air was disabled?

    I.e., it's easy to make a box that is INTERNALLY thermally managed
    when it sits in a giant "heatsink" consisting of a large air mass
    (that *something* is likely maintaining at a constant temperature).

    But, take that same device and sit it in a closed volume of "still"
    air and see how it behaves when that "heat sink" suddenly climbs in temperature.

    As I mentioned, up-thread, datacenters deal with this all the time
    as they have far too much heat being dissipated in their internal
    volumes than typical structures of similar size. On a smaller
    scale, an equipment rack has to take on the responsibility for
    cooling its own volume given that it has more thermal load contained
    within than a "bench/desktop" environment. A small equipment closet
    is similarly burdened.

    The question becomes "at what ratio does the volume of the space
    become an active design issue (for a given power dissipation)".
    E.g., 100W in 1000cu ft vs. 1000W in 10,000 cu ft vs. ...
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From john larkin@jl@glen--canyon.com to sci.electronics.design on Sat Sep 27 12:30:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 12:21:11 -0700, Don Y
    <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    On 9/27/2025 11:09 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    I want to model a heat load. I'm assuming I can simulate about 90% of
    the power delivered into a 100W bulb as being thrown off as heat?
    This, a cheaper alternative to lots of high power resistive loads...

    Probably more than 90% - and the light will turn nto heat when it is
    absorbed by the walls and the contents of the room. You need to measure
    the voltage and the current because the resistance of a tungsten
    filament lamp increases greatly with temperature, so you can't make
    assumptions from just the voltage or the current alone.

    I will be controlling the power into the load. But, I need a (cheap)
    load that I can easily resize.

    Surfaces absorbing heat from light will tend (?) to do so slower than
    the radiated heat from the lamps' inefficiencies. (I don't want to have to >"soak" for a long time to get a feel as to the temperature rise in the >volume)

    An incandescent filament is fast. You can audio modulate one usefully.

    Let the light escape and don't worry about it.

    But I really don't understand what you are trying to do. Do you need a
    dummy load, or are you trying to heat some space?


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From liz@liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) to sci.electronics.design on Sat Sep 27 21:42:18 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    On 9/27/2025 11:09 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    I want to model a heat load. I'm assuming I can simulate about 90% of
    the power delivered into a 100W bulb as being thrown off as heat?
    This, a cheaper alternative to lots of high power resistive loads...

    Probably more than 90% - and the light will turn nto heat when it is absorbed by the walls and the contents of the room. You need to measure the voltage and the current because the resistance of a tungsten
    filament lamp increases greatly with temperature, so you can't make assumptions from just the voltage or the current alone.

    I will be controlling the power into the load. But, I need a (cheap)
    load that I can easily resize.

    Surfaces absorbing heat from light will tend (?) to do so slower than
    the radiated heat from the lamps' inefficiencies. (I don't want to have to "soak" for a long time to get a feel as to the temperature rise in the volume)

    I'm not sure that is correct. The energy input to the surfaces will
    start instantaneously - but they will be slow to heat up because the
    actual amount of energy input is small and their thermal mass is large.
    The same energy flow carried by convected air would actually take longer
    to heat them because the air would have to be heated first to establish
    the circulation.


    Industrial fan heaters also make good loads, I have used them as
    starters for a three-phase motor with a high inertia load (it took over
    45 seconds to run up to speed).

    "Fan heater"? A ceramic heating element with forced air over it?
    Will it "melt" (degrade) if the forced air was disabled?

    The ones we used had wide-pitches spirals of nichrome wire stretched
    back and forth between porcelain insulating plates. If the fan failed
    they would take a minute or two to glow red hot, by which time a
    bimetallic thermal cutout would have disconnected them. The danger
    wasn't the nichrome or the porcelain melting but the effect of high
    temperature on the motor windings and the possibility of starting a fire
    if dust had collected near the element.

    If you want the elements to operate without the fan-assisted air flow
    (which is quite gentle in a large industrial heater) just put pairs of
    elements in series and lay them horizontally so that they are convection cooled. They are unlikely to overheat at one quarter of their rated
    power.

    For testing the power dissipation capabilities of a large die-cast box,
    I just bolted a couple of aluminium-cased power resistors onto it. From
    those results I was able to calculate the largest size of audio
    amplifier that could be built into that box without needing a separate
    heat sink.
    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Martin Brown@'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk to sci.electronics.design on Sat Sep 27 21:50:34 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 27/09/2025 20:12, Don Y wrote:
    On 9/27/2025 11:27 AM, Martin Brown wrote:
    On 27/09/2025 18:33, Don Y wrote:
    I want to model a heat load.-a I'm assuming I can simulate about 90% of
    the power delivered into a 100W bulb as being thrown off as heat?
    This, a cheaper alternative to lots of high power resistive loads...

    Electric fire bars are probably cheaper and much more robust for
    bigger loads.

    What's a "fire bar"?

    1cm diameter 25cm long ceramic former spiral wrapped with ~0.8mm
    nichrome wire 1kw resistive heating element for an electric fire.

    "100% efficient!" at turning electricity into heat. Glow orange in use.

    This is a traditional radiant electric fire with modern 600W fire bars:

    https://www.chums.co.uk/products/hb813/two-bar-heater

    But today fitted with a safety bar glass covered.
    Most electric fires now are much more fancy with pretend LED flames.
    This one isn't.

    https://www.chums.co.uk/products/az971/free-standing-electric-fire

    That is a modern one with much longer element glass coated so you can't
    easily electrocute yourself. The ones of my youth were bare nichrome
    wire on a ceramic former. I still have a couple of bars of that type.

    Convenient as indestructible 1kW loads at mains voltage.

    US 100v bulbs are a bit more efficient than UK 240v ones.

    Bulbs are cheap.-a If I need to use 10% more of them, <shrug>-a I can put them
    on a rheostat and "tune" the actual power dissipated (as I don't care what happens to the light)

    Filament bulbs last a lot longer if you put a small power resistor in
    series to limit the inrush current into the cold filament.

    I have used light bulbs as a heat source for terrariums.

    We use "XMAS lights" (strings of 25 x 9W lamps) on the citrus on winter nights.
    Not to keep the trees *warm* but, rather, to keep the air moving around
    them
    (air that settles on the leaves is COLDER than the surrounding air).

    [I've been looking for fans that are capable of being used in outdoor settings (think:-a rainfall) as they would be easier to deploy to
    protect such a large volume (~4000-8000 cu ft)]

    You can surround them with a big plastic or ducting tube.
    --
    Martin Brown

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Don Y@blockedofcourse@foo.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Sat Sep 27 14:59:06 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 9/27/2025 1:42 PM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    I will be controlling the power into the load. But, I need a (cheap)
    load that I can easily resize.

    Surfaces absorbing heat from light will tend (?) to do so slower than
    the radiated heat from the lamps' inefficiencies. (I don't want to have to >> "soak" for a long time to get a feel as to the temperature rise in the
    volume)

    I'm not sure that is correct. The energy input to the surfaces will
    start instantaneously - but they will be slow to heat up because the
    actual amount of energy input is small and their thermal mass is large.
    The same energy flow carried by convected air would actually take longer
    to heat them because the air would have to be heated first to establish
    the circulation.

    I want to see how the unvented space reacts to the load. Take the "amplifier simulator" you mentioned, below, and sit it in a cupboard. Closet. etc. "Suddenly", the "die cast box" isn't sitting in a nice, comfortable 25C
    ambient "heatsink" but, rather, a warmed environment that only loses heat
    by convection through walls, floor, ceiling, etc. There WILL be some maximum temperature attained beyond which power injected manages to dissipate out of the enclosure-enclosure.

    What will that temperature rise be?

    How much forced air ventilation (using air of a particular inlet temperature) will be required to limit the temperature rise to X?

    At what point does refrigeration become necessary to limit the heat gain
    and ventilation airflow/noise? (e.g., if you're moving 1000CFM through
    the volume, it's probably having a noticeable spillover/spillinto effect nearby)

    Industrial fan heaters also make good loads, I have used them as
    starters for a three-phase motor with a high inertia load (it took over
    45 seconds to run up to speed).

    "Fan heater"? A ceramic heating element with forced air over it?
    Will it "melt" (degrade) if the forced air was disabled?

    The ones we used had wide-pitches spirals of nichrome wire stretched
    back and forth between porcelain insulating plates. If the fan failed
    they would take a minute or two to glow red hot, by which time a
    bimetallic thermal cutout would have disconnected them. The danger
    wasn't the nichrome or the porcelain melting but the effect of high temperature on the motor windings and the possibility of starting a fire
    if dust had collected near the element.

    I don't want the heat source to "stir the air". The volume needs to just passively react to the presence of a heat source (the lamps, in my suggestion) so the device that is being emulated by the heat source can be affected by
    the accumulating heat.

    If you want the elements to operate without the fan-assisted air flow
    (which is quite gentle in a large industrial heater) just put pairs of elements in series and lay them horizontally so that they are convection cooled. They are unlikely to overheat at one quarter of their rated
    power.

    Is there a means of controlling the size load they represent (that is
    not temperature controlled)? If just resistive, then I should be
    able to control the amount of power delivered instead of worrying about
    the amount they *consume*.

    For testing the power dissipation capabilities of a large die-cast box,
    I just bolted a couple of aluminium-cased power resistors onto it. From those results I was able to calculate the largest size of audio
    amplifier that could be built into that box without needing a separate
    heat sink.

    Yes, but, as I mentioned above, you likely assumed said box was surrounded
    by a 25C ambient "heatsink". Put it in your closet and see how it fares.
    See how the *other* items in your closet fare!

    Then, ask how you could locate it there without unwanted "ill effects".

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Don Y@blockedofcourse@foo.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Sat Sep 27 15:02:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 9/27/2025 2:59 PM, Don Y wrote:
    On 9/27/2025 1:42 PM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    I was able to calculate the largest size of audio
    amplifier that could be built into that box without needing a separate
    heat sink.

    Yes, but, as I mentioned above, you likely assumed said box was surrounded
    by a 25C ambient "heatsink".-a Put it in your closet and see how it fares. See how the *other* items in your closet fare!

    Then, ask how you could locate it there without unwanted "ill effects".

    I.e., permanently *site* the power amplifier that you were modeling
    in that closet.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Don Y@blockedofcourse@foo.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Sat Sep 27 17:08:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 9/27/2025 1:50 PM, Martin Brown wrote:
    On 27/09/2025 20:12, Don Y wrote:
    On 9/27/2025 11:27 AM, Martin Brown wrote:
    On 27/09/2025 18:33, Don Y wrote:
    I want to model a heat load.-a I'm assuming I can simulate about 90% of >>>> the power delivered into a 100W bulb as being thrown off as heat?
    This, a cheaper alternative to lots of high power resistive loads...

    Electric fire bars are probably cheaper and much more robust for bigger loads.

    What's a "fire bar"?

    1cm diameter 25cm long ceramic former spiral wrapped with ~0.8mm nichrome wire
    1kw resistive heating element for an electric fire.

    "100% efficient!" at turning electricity into heat. Glow orange in use.

    This is a traditional radiant electric fire with modern 600W fire bars:

    https://www.chums.co.uk/products/hb813/two-bar-heater

    Ah, OK. A ceramic heater. They are frowned on, here, as potential sources
    of fires (some are so inexpensive that you should be super wary of ever connecting them to power!)

    But today fitted with a safety bar glass covered.
    Most electric fires now are much more fancy with pretend LED flames.

    Here, they sell "fake fireplaces" with such features. Some folks locate
    these *in* their REAL fireplace (as they want the "effect" without the
    effort of having to burn wood)

    This one isn't.

    https://www.chums.co.uk/products/az971/free-standing-electric-fire

    That is a modern one with much longer element glass coated so you can't easily
    electrocute yourself. The ones of my youth were bare nichrome wire on a ceramic
    former. I still have a couple of bars of that type.

    Convenient as indestructible 1kW loads at mains voltage.

    My problem is developing incremental loads over a wide range. I figured
    "light bulbs" gives me that ability (pick a set of "wattages" and wire them together). They also let me avoid a "point (ahem) source" and more appropriately model the locations of individual devices in the space.

    E.g., if you wanted to simulate a rack packed with servers, you'd want to
    stack ~150W loads in a vertical column.

    US 100v bulbs are a bit more efficient than UK 240v ones.

    Bulbs are cheap.-a If I need to use 10% more of them, <shrug>-a I can put them
    on a rheostat and "tune" the actual power dissipated (as I don't care what >> happens to the light)

    Filament bulbs last a lot longer if you put a small power resistor in series to
    limit the inrush current into the cold filament.

    This is a one-off use. I just want to collect data to determine/validate cooling requirements.

    [I use "commercial" incandescent bulbs, here. They are designed to operate
    at 130VAC and have a thicker filament. Of course, you get less light out
    of them running at 120VAC so you specify higher "wattages" than needed.
    E.g., 100W commercial instead of 75W consumer. They also let you get the lamps REALLY dim with a conventional dimmer such that you can't even see them lit unless it is absolutely dark! (we use this feature to create "area-wide nightlights" for our houseguests who aren't familiar with the house layout, furnishings, floor elevations, etc. Its perfect when you wake into an otherwise "dark" house.]

    I have used light bulbs as a heat source for terrariums.

    We use "XMAS lights" (strings of 25 x 9W lamps) on the citrus on winter nights.
    Not to keep the trees *warm* but, rather, to keep the air moving around them >> (air that settles on the leaves is COLDER than the surrounding air).

    [I've been looking for fans that are capable of being used in outdoor
    settings (think:-a rainfall) as they would be easier to deploy to
    protect such a large volume (~4000-8000 cu ft)]

    You can surround them with a big plastic or ducting tube.

    You have to channel the air upward into the foliage. And, over a ~400 sq ft area. So, you expect them to capture water (as well as bird shit!).

    I package them in what look like P-traps so the air ends up where you want
    yet the rainfall has a place to pool (and drain) without approaching the fan.

    But, I have to find special fans to fit the available tubing!

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Don Y@blockedofcourse@foo.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Sat Sep 27 21:51:42 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 9/27/2025 2:59 PM, Don Y wrote:
    On 9/27/2025 1:42 PM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    I will be controlling the power into the load.-a But, I need a (cheap)
    load that I can easily resize.

    Surfaces absorbing heat from light will tend (?) to do so slower than
    the radiated heat from the lamps' inefficiencies.-a (I don't want to have to
    "soak" for a long time to get a feel as to the temperature rise in the
    volume)

    I'm not sure that is correct.-a The energy input to the surfaces will
    start instantaneously - but they will be slow to heat up because the
    actual amount of energy input is small and their thermal mass is large.
    The same energy flow carried by convected air would actually take longer
    to heat them because the air would have to be heated first to establish
    the circulation.

    I wonder how the bulbs would fare if *painted* to block the light?
    Hmmm... They're cheap. And, worst case, they shatter. I'll try that tomorrow!

    I want to see how the unvented space reacts to the load.-a Take the "amplifier
    simulator" you mentioned, below, and sit it in a cupboard.-a Closet.-a etc. "Suddenly", the "die cast box" isn't sitting in a nice, comfortable 25C ambient "heatsink" but, rather, a warmed environment that only loses heat
    by convection through walls, floor, ceiling, etc.-a There WILL be some maximum

    s.b. "conduction" -- though some convection through inevitable gaps

    temperature attained beyond which power injected manages to dissipate out of the enclosure-enclosure.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From legg@legg@nospam.magma.ca to sci.electronics.design on Sun Sep 28 14:40:36 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 10:33:58 -0700, Don Y
    <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    I want to model a heat load. I'm assuming I can simulate about 90% of
    the power delivered into a 100W bulb as being thrown off as heat?
    This, a cheaper alternative to lots of high power resistive loads...


    Halogen/tungsten lamps produce >95% of their luminous output in
    the infrared.

    Model?

    RL
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Don Y@blockedofcourse@foo.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Sun Sep 28 14:56:49 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 9/28/2025 11:40 AM, legg wrote:
    On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 10:33:58 -0700, Don Y
    <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    I want to model a heat load. I'm assuming I can simulate about 90% of
    the power delivered into a 100W bulb as being thrown off as heat?
    This, a cheaper alternative to lots of high power resistive loads...

    Halogen/tungsten lamps produce >95% of their luminous output in
    the infrared.

    Yeah, bit they all seem to be higher wattages. And, not as readily available as traditional incandescents. E.g., you could piece together a 4, 10, 20, 40, 60, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300, 500, etc watt "load" with the items that you
    could find on hand in many homes (even if it meant removing lamps from fixtures).

    The halogens I've seen tend to be in floodlights -- hundreds of watts and up.

    Model?

    Create a load that mimics device(s) dissipating certain amounts of power
    in certain place(s) in a volume. Note how the space responds to the
    presence of that load, over time. Explore options to decrease that impact
    to "manageable" levels, given the other items that may share that volume.

    As I commented to Liz, imagine siting a power amplifier in a bedroom closet. How does the operating condition for the amplifier change as it throws off
    heat that the surrounding space CAN'T dissipate? How do the items in
    the closet react to the presence of this unexpected heat source?

    IME, people think nothing of siting a wireless router in such a place.
    But, that's a tiny thermal load. Could you similarly site it at the
    back of a kitchen/pantry cabinet? How "much" could you site in a space
    (in your home or business) that wasn't explicitly designed for such use?

    Maybe a PABX in a small equipment closet? A small server in a broom closet?

    The more important followon question is "what type of space would you want designed into a residence/business to support a particular size load,
    given the cooling requirements it might necessitate?" Your home likely has
    a place for "guests" to stash their coats -- and, it's likely not in some far off corner but readily accessible from your main entrance. There is a reason for that.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From liz@liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) to sci.electronics.design on Mon Sep 29 09:31:24 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    On 9/28/2025 11:40 AM, legg wrote:
    On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 10:33:58 -0700, Don Y
    <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    I want to model a heat load. I'm assuming I can simulate about 90% of
    the power delivered into a 100W bulb as being thrown off as heat?
    This, a cheaper alternative to lots of high power resistive loads...

    Halogen/tungsten lamps produce >95% of their luminous output in
    the infrared.

    Yeah, bit they all seem to be higher wattages. And, not as readily available as traditional incandescents. E.g., you could piece together a 4, 10, 20, 40,
    60, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300, 500, etc watt "load" with the items that you could find on hand in many homes (even if it meant removing lamps from fixtures).

    The halogens I've seen tend to be in floodlights -- hundreds of watts and up.

    Model?

    Create a load that mimics device(s) dissipating certain amounts of power
    in certain place(s) in a volume. Note how the space responds to the
    presence of that load, over time. Explore options to decrease that impact
    to "manageable" levels, given the other items that may share that volume.

    As I commented to Liz, imagine siting a power amplifier in a bedroom closet. How does the operating condition for the amplifier change as it throws off heat that the surrounding space CAN'T dissipate? How do the items in
    the closet react to the presence of this unexpected heat source?

    IME, people think nothing of siting a wireless router in such a place.
    But, that's a tiny thermal load. Could you similarly site it at the
    back of a kitchen/pantry cabinet? How "much" could you site in a space
    (in your home or business) that wasn't explicitly designed for such use?

    Maybe a PABX in a small equipment closet? A small server in a broom closet?

    The more important followon question is "what type of space would you want designed into a residence/business to support a particular size load,
    given the cooling requirements it might necessitate?" Your home likely has
    a place for "guests" to stash their coats -- and, it's likely not in some far off corner but readily accessible from your main entrance. There is a reason for that.

    In theory you could measure the thermal conductivity of the different
    materials or combinations of material the heat energy would have to pass through, then calculate the overall temperature gradient to whatever
    ambient you set as your maximum. The problem with large spaces and
    objects is that poor convection and conduction give very significant differences in temperature between various parts.

    Stirring the air will distribute the temperature more evenly and bring
    down the hot spots, but it will still hit a limit imposed by the
    conductivity of the various layers the heat has to travel through. You
    also have to take into account the certainty that a fan will fail during
    the lifetime of the equipment (and may put an end to that lifetime).
    Convection 'chimneys' are much more reliable as long as the equipment is
    only used the right way up.

    Even with the most careful calculations, things can be disrupted by
    unexpected events. I once left an automatic battery charger, in the
    corner of a Portakabin, supplying the batteries running a P.A. system
    for a large event. When I came back to check, I found it was underneath
    a pile of coats and almost too hot to touch. The internal temperature
    sensing had shut down the output to a level which it could sustain, so
    there was no damage but the batteries weren't happy. When I removed the
    coats, it cooled down and returned to normal operation.

    The moral of that story is to assume the equipment will eventually
    overheat from some unforseen cause and make sure it degrades gracefully
    without damage.

    There is a tendency, left over from the days of valves and expensive
    power transistors, to try to extract the maximum output from a single
    device. Two transistors in parallel have half the dissipation and half
    the thermal resistance to the heatsink of a single transistor, so the
    slight extra complication of using two devices is more than compensated
    by the four-fold reduction in the temperature gradient.
    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Don Y@blockedofcourse@foo.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Mon Sep 29 03:26:08 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    The more important followon question is "what type of space would you want >> designed into a residence/business to support a particular size load,
    given the cooling requirements it might necessitate?" Your home likely has >> a place for "guests" to stash their coats -- and, it's likely not in some far
    off corner but readily accessible from your main entrance. There is a reason
    for that.

    In theory you could measure the thermal conductivity of the different materials or combinations of material the heat energy would have to pass through, then calculate the overall temperature gradient to whatever
    ambient you set as your maximum. The problem with large spaces and
    objects is that poor convection and conduction give very significant differences in temperature between various parts.

    My concern is in talking with architects to give them guidance for
    creating suitable spaces for the equipment. Retrofitting to THIS house
    has been tedious as it wasn't designed with that sort of thing in mind.
    There aren't even "small spaces" that could be repurposed for those
    uses (more of an "open" floor plan; hard to "hide" stuff).

    Stirring the air will distribute the temperature more evenly and bring
    down the hot spots, but it will still hit a limit imposed by the
    conductivity of the various layers the heat has to travel through. You
    also have to take into account the certainty that a fan will fail during
    the lifetime of the equipment (and may put an end to that lifetime). Convection 'chimneys' are much more reliable as long as the equipment is
    only used the right way up.

    Even with the most careful calculations, things can be disrupted by unexpected events. I once left an automatic battery charger, in the
    corner of a Portakabin, supplying the batteries running a P.A. system
    for a large event. When I came back to check, I found it was underneath
    a pile of coats and almost too hot to touch. The internal temperature sensing had shut down the output to a level which it could sustain, so
    there was no damage but the batteries weren't happy. When I removed the coats, it cooled down and returned to normal operation.

    That can work both ways. E.g., a space that is accessed frequently
    offers "free" opportunities to shed accumulated heat.

    The moral of that story is to assume the equipment will eventually
    overheat from some unforseen cause and make sure it degrades gracefully without damage.

    There is no danger of overheating. I actively manage the loads.
    But, if I'm throttling back a "load", then that affects availability.
    So, that has to be a boundary condition and not a normal mode of
    operation.

    There is a tendency, left over from the days of valves and expensive
    power transistors, to try to extract the maximum output from a single
    device. Two transistors in parallel have half the dissipation and half
    the thermal resistance to the heatsink of a single transistor, so the
    slight extra complication of using two devices is more than compensated
    by the four-fold reduction in the temperature gradient.

    Here, the issue is more one of putting too many devices in too small
    of a space. For example, I rely on an RDBMS as my sole persistent store.
    As an expedient, I'm using a pair of NUC5i7RYHs for the RDBMS and
    it's mirror. And, a pair of NUC5i5RYKs for the SAN and it's mirror.
    This lets me use COTS software for those functions with a veneer around
    each to make them compatible with the rest of the architecture.

    The i7's run a TDP of ~28W. The i5's at ~15W (hand-waving away some details). So, there's ~80W -- hiding under a shelf in the pantry (!).

    For now, I can easily vent that space until I get around to designing
    compute and storage engines to replace them with "proprietary" (custom) software.

    But, I don't have control over how other sites get configured. So, it's possible that some will fail to address the thermal issues -- until the
    system detects an out-of-bounds condition and takes action to limit its
    impact (i.e., reduce functionality/availability).

    It's a different game when your product/system relies on the skills
    of others to ensure its performance. (and I have no desire to
    deal with "customers" or "users"!)

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carl@carl.ijamesXX@YYverizon.net to sci.electronics.design on Mon Sep 29 09:07:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 9/28/25 5:56 PM, Don Y wrote:
    On 9/28/2025 11:40 AM, legg wrote:
    On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 10:33:58 -0700, Don Y
    <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    I want to model a heat load.-a I'm assuming I can simulate about 90% of
    the power delivered into a 100W bulb as being thrown off as heat?
    This, a cheaper alternative to lots of high power resistive loads...

    Halogen/tungsten lamps produce >95% of their luminous output in
    the infrared.

    Yeah, bit they all seem to be higher wattages.-a And, not as readily available
    as traditional incandescents.-a E.g., you could piece together a 4, 10,
    20, 40,
    60, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300, 500, etc watt "load" with the items that you could find on hand in many homes (even if it meant removing lamps from fixtures).

    The halogens I've seen tend to be in floodlights -- hundreds of watts
    and up.

    Do a search for G4 halogen 20W 2 pin bulb. These run on 12 volts and
    were (maybe still are?) popular for under-cabinet kitchen lighting. I
    know 10W's were available, not sure about other sizes. Not the standard screw-in Edison base, but widely available.


    Model?

    Create a load that mimics device(s) dissipating certain amounts of power
    in certain place(s) in a volume.-a Note how the space responds to the presence of that load, over time.-a Explore options to decrease that impact to "manageable" levels, given the other items that may share that volume.

    As I commented to Liz, imagine siting a power amplifier in a bedroom
    closet.
    How does the operating condition for the amplifier change as it throws off heat that the surrounding space CAN'T dissipate?-a How do the items in
    the closet react to the presence of this unexpected heat source?

    IME, people think nothing of siting a wireless router in such a place.
    But, that's a tiny thermal load.-a Could you similarly site it at the
    back of a kitchen/pantry cabinet?-a How "much" could you site in a space
    (in your home or business) that wasn't explicitly designed for such use?

    Maybe a PABX in a small equipment closet?-a A small server in a broom closet?

    The more important followon question is "what type of space would you want designed into a residence/business to support a particular size load,
    given the cooling requirements it might necessitate?"-a Your home likely has a place for "guests" to stash their coats -- and, it's likely not in
    some far
    off corner but readily accessible from your main entrance.-a There is a reason
    for that.
    --
    Regards,
    Carl
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From legg@legg@nospam.magma.ca to sci.electronics.design on Mon Sep 29 09:23:07 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On Sun, 28 Sep 2025 14:56:49 -0700, Don Y
    <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    On 9/28/2025 11:40 AM, legg wrote:
    On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 10:33:58 -0700, Don Y
    <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    I want to model a heat load. I'm assuming I can simulate about 90% of
    the power delivered into a 100W bulb as being thrown off as heat?
    This, a cheaper alternative to lots of high power resistive loads...

    Halogen/tungsten lamps produce >95% of their luminous output in
    the infrared.

    Yeah, bit they all seem to be higher wattages. And, not as readily available >as traditional incandescents. E.g., you could piece together a 4, 10, 20, 40, >60, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300, 500, etc watt "load" with the items that you >could find on hand in many homes (even if it meant removing lamps from >fixtures).

    The halogens I've seen tend to be in floodlights -- hundreds of watts and up.

    buck a-piece from off-shore'

    For laods, when the real thing is too expensive or unobtainable, Use
    generic HVAC heaters and duct fans. standard sizes etc. If you want calibration, wire your own using nichrome heater coiled wire.

    Model?

    Create a load that mimics device(s) dissipating certain amounts of power
    in certain place(s) in a volume. Note how the space responds to the
    presence of that load, over time. Explore options to decrease that impact
    to "manageable" levels, given the other items that may share that volume.

    As I commented to Liz, imagine siting a power amplifier in a bedroom closet. >How does the operating condition for the amplifier change as it throws off >heat that the surrounding space CAN'T dissipate? How do the items in
    the closet react to the presence of this unexpected heat source?

    IME, people think nothing of siting a wireless router in such a place.
    But, that's a tiny thermal load. Could you similarly site it at the
    back of a kitchen/pantry cabinet? How "much" could you site in a space
    (in your home or business) that wasn't explicitly designed for such use?

    Maybe a PABX in a small equipment closet? A small server in a broom closet?

    Maybe maybe maybe. What's your problem?

    Stick your heaters in a wooden box, the average surface temperature
    rise of the outer box wall, above ambient, will be:

    1 degree C,
    for every milliwatt being dissipated
    by individual square centimeters doing the job.
    (blocked surfaces don't count - simple inverted surfaces do)

    + / - 5%

    from cigarette box to two-man carry shipping container, in free air.

    Don't forget to measure each centimeter accurately, for averaging.
    It's sort of cool knowing what each centimeter is actually doing,
    and may give you some useful packaging ideas.

    This is, of course, reversible. You can reliably estimate power
    dissipation of a surface are with known aveerage rise.

    What you can't tell, is what the spot temperature of the internal
    radiator. That's modelling for you. The smaller the source gets,
    the higher it's temperature in order to dissipate the power being
    wasted, and the stupidder the modeling and modeller becomes.

    I've had to demonstrate this too many times in the past, to enjoy
    explaining the miracle coefficient ' 1 '.

    It's drawn from and confirmed by those demonstations and from
    ripple current rating charts of phsically dimensioned, thermally
    restricted, computer grade aluminium elctrolytic caps. From before
    the days of built-in fans for cooling for reliable equipment.. ..........................

    Thermal rise of surrounding air is fixed by it's 'specific heat'.

    Move volume of such air elsewhere, by any means you desire, to
    evacuate volume area requiring cooling. Rates are measurable.


    Add conditions codicils or flambools as you will. principals will be
    the same.

    The more important followon question is "what type of space would you want >designed into a residence/business to support a particular size load,
    given the cooling requirements it might necessitate?" Your home likely has
    a place for "guests" to stash their coats -- and, it's likely not in some far >off corner but readily accessible from your main entrance. There is a reason >for that.

    What would you want? You'd follow the mfr's instructions, or draw from
    your own experience/observation. There's probably a second hand book
    discarded from the local library or tech college somewhere


    You're not designing a clothes closet or an airing cupboard.
    Those are really tricky.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Don Y@blockedofcourse@foo.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Mon Sep 29 09:51:27 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 9/29/2025 6:07 AM, Carl wrote:
    On 9/28/25 5:56 PM, Don Y wrote:
    On 9/28/2025 11:40 AM, legg wrote:
    On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 10:33:58 -0700, Don Y
    <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    I want to model a heat load.-a I'm assuming I can simulate about 90% of >>>> the power delivered into a 100W bulb as being thrown off as heat?
    This, a cheaper alternative to lots of high power resistive loads...

    Halogen/tungsten lamps produce >95% of their luminous output in
    the infrared.

    Yeah, bit they all seem to be higher wattages.-a And, not as readily available
    as traditional incandescents.-a E.g., you could piece together a 4, 10, 20, 40,
    60, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300, 500, etc watt "load" with the items that you
    could find on hand in many homes (even if it meant removing lamps from
    fixtures).

    The halogens I've seen tend to be in floodlights -- hundreds of watts and up.

    Do a search for G4 halogen 20W 2 pin bulb.-a These run on 12 volts and were (maybe still are?) popular for under-cabinet kitchen lighting.-a I know 10W's
    were available, not sure about other sizes.-a Not the standard screw-in Edison
    base, but widely available.

    But, what advantage over just using OTS incandescents? No need to
    purchase special "holders", etc. And, when I'm done gathering data,
    I can put the bulbs back on the shelf (or, return them to their fixtures)
    for later use.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Don Y@blockedofcourse@foo.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Mon Sep 29 10:33:46 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    Maybe a PABX in a small equipment closet? A small server in a broom closet?

    Maybe maybe maybe. What's your problem?

    My "problem" is homes haven't historically been designed to "provide
    an environment for" electronics that control and monitor the home
    "at scale".


    Stick your heaters in a wooden box, the average surface temperature
    rise of the outer box wall, above ambient, will be:

    Stick them in a room with two south&west facing walls made of cement block
    and two "interior" walls made of gypsum over lumber.

    Open the door to that room every hour; day; week.

    Textbook solutions don't work -- unless you can control how that space
    is accessed.

    Our refrigerator has three cooling compartments. Two are set to
    maintain the same conditions. If we store our citrus crop in the
    "main refrigerator", the fruit "rot" in short order. Because the
    door to that space opens and closes dozens of times each day;
    the temperature and humidity are poorly controlled, regardless
    of WHERE in that space you locate them!

    OTOH, we opted to "reserve" one of the cooling spaces for JUST
    citrus. It is only accessed once every 3 or 4 days (to retrieve
    fruit for the next 3-4 day period). As a result, we are STILL
    eating the crop harvested in February; using the main compartment,
    these would have had to be discarded before the end of June.

    Design a piece of equipment with EASILY REMOVABLE PANELS.
    Predict how it will fare when a user opens it up and stores
    clothes in the available internal volume. Or, opts to remove the
    panels permanently.

    In my case, design bits of kit and rely on the user/installer to
    site them in places that will be capable of providing adequate
    "heat sinking" (cooling) -- given that the end user likely has
    his own idea as to how those spaces should be used (now or later).

    I have reasonably large loads in very small "enclosed" spaces
    with no problems -- because those spaces are regularly ventilated
    through normal use (e.g., the door that seals the space is opened
    many times during the course of EVERY day causing the entire volume
    to be replaced with each access).

    Don't forget to measure each centimeter accurately, for averaging.
    It's sort of cool knowing what each centimeter is actually doing,
    and may give you some useful packaging ideas.

    *I* am not the one doing the packaging. The user is taking devices that
    I have designed and "packaging" them in various locations in his business
    or home. I have ensured they will operate over a specific range of
    ambient temperatures. I make no guarantees over how the items they
    are sited with will behave: stick one in your freezer and *it* will
    perform as advertised -- but, the sirloin steak that happened to be
    positioned on top of it may not fare well!

    When Liz designs her amplifier, does she include notes telling the user
    how large a volume of space must surround it, for any given ambient?
    Or, does she just specify the ambient and leave it to the user to
    resolve that problem?

    This is, of course, reversible. You can reliably estimate power
    dissipation of a surface are with known aveerage rise.

    What you can't tell, is what the spot temperature of the internal
    radiator. That's modelling for you. The smaller the source gets,
    the higher it's temperature in order to dissipate the power being
    wasted, and the stupidder the modeling and modeller becomes.

    I've had to demonstrate this too many times in the past, to enjoy
    explaining the miracle coefficient ' 1 '.

    It's drawn from and confirmed by those demonstations and from
    ripple current rating charts of phsically dimensioned, thermally
    restricted, computer grade aluminium elctrolytic caps. From before
    the days of built-in fans for cooling for reliable equipment.. ..........................

    Thermal rise of surrounding air is fixed by it's 'specific heat'.

    Move volume of such air elsewhere, by any means you desire, to
    evacuate volume area requiring cooling. Rates are measurable.

    And, I have chosen to measure *effect* instead of "air flow".
    How do I measure how much air is replaced in a pantry each time
    I open the door? Considerably easier to measure its *effect* on
    the temperature with a particular load in place.

    Add conditions codicils or flambools as you will. principals will be
    the same.

    The more important followon question is "what type of space would you want >> designed into a residence/business to support a particular size load,
    given the cooling requirements it might necessitate?" Your home likely has >> a place for "guests" to stash their coats -- and, it's likely not in some far
    off corner but readily accessible from your main entrance. There is a reason
    for that.

    What would you want? You'd follow the mfr's instructions, or draw from
    your own experience/observation. There's probably a second hand book discarded from the local library or tech college somewhere

    I have a bit over 3KW of load to distribute in a residence. Here's
    the kit. *You*, homeowner, site it "per manufacturer's directions" ("Guaranteed to operate in ambient temperature range of X-Y; disclaimer:
    we make no guarantees as to how YOUR colocated stuff will fare as
    a result of heat thrown off by our devices! The power dissipation
    for each are enumerated below. Have at it!")

    If you are like damn near everyone, you won't know where to begin!
    If your home has been *designed* with this in mind, then you are
    more likely to welcome it.

    "Here's the HVAC plant for your home. Figure out where you want
    to site it..."

    "Here are the commodes for your home. Figure out where you want
    to site *them*..."

    If you're purchasing a "tract home", you're likely on your own
    (hire a consulting service!). OTOH, if you are buying a "custom
    home", the architect who designed the home can have anticipated
    this need to create a space that can be easily ventilated with
    some margin for the inevitable "encroachment" that the homeowner
    will make on that space. E.g., when garages were initially conceived,
    they were intended to house vehicles. Yet, now we see refrigerators
    and freezers *rated* for use in garages -- because it is so common
    for people to

    You're not designing a clothes closet or an airing cupboard.
    Those are really tricky.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carl@carl.ijamesXX@YYverizon.net to sci.electronics.design on Mon Sep 29 13:48:03 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 9/29/25 12:51 PM, Don Y wrote:
    On 9/29/2025 6:07 AM, Carl wrote:
    On 9/28/25 5:56 PM, Don Y wrote:
    On 9/28/2025 11:40 AM, legg wrote:
    On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 10:33:58 -0700, Don Y
    <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    I want to model a heat load.-a I'm assuming I can simulate about 90% of >>>>> the power delivered into a 100W bulb as being thrown off as heat?
    This, a cheaper alternative to lots of high power resistive loads...

    Halogen/tungsten lamps produce >95% of their luminous output in
    the infrared.

    Yeah, bit they all seem to be higher wattages.-a And, not as readily
    available
    as traditional incandescents.-a E.g., you could piece together a 4,
    10, 20, 40,
    60, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300, 500, etc watt "load" with the items that you >>> could find on hand in many homes (even if it meant removing lamps from
    fixtures).

    The halogens I've seen tend to be in floodlights -- hundreds of watts
    and up.

    Do a search for G4 halogen 20W 2 pin bulb.-a These run on 12 volts and
    were (maybe still are?) popular for under-cabinet kitchen lighting.-a I
    know 10W's were available, not sure about other sizes.-a Not the
    standard screw-in Edison base, but widely available.

    But, what advantage over just using OTS incandescents?-a No need to
    purchase special "holders", etc.-a And, when I'm done gathering data,
    I can put the bulbs back on the shelf (or, return them to their fixtures)
    for later use.


    I didn't recommend for or against them, and have no intention of doing
    so. You implied that you didn't know of any readily available halogen
    bulbs under "hundreds of watts" and I gave you an example of a 20W bulb
    type that I know is readily available. Anything further is beyond my
    interest and entirely up to you.
    --
    Regards,
    Carl
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From liz@liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) to sci.electronics.design on Mon Sep 29 22:37:51 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:


    [...]

    When Liz designs her amplifier, does she include notes telling the user
    how large a volume of space must surround it, for any given ambient?
    Or, does she just specify the ambient and leave it to the user to
    resolve that problem?

    I am normally the only user, so the problem doesn't arise. I designed
    it so that with a 30% overload, the casing temperature would rise to 50
    C in a 20 C ambient. Above that temperature the operator woulld burn
    their fingers on the controls, so would be inclined to take some action
    to reduce the load. (It is a combined mixer and P.A. amplifier, so the operator would be constantly handling the controls.)

    Even at that case temperature the output transistors would have their
    junctions well below the maximum-allowable temperature because they are
    run in paralleled pairs, so the thermal resistance between the junctions
    and the heat sink is much lower than it would be with a single device.
    The drop in current gain with output current is also reduced, so the
    driver stage has less work to do.

    I once had to use it badly overloaded, in emergency, for an evening
    dance in a large hall. Before we started I went to the rubbish area and
    tore a flap off a large cardboard box. Two of us took it in turns to
    sit in the 'wings' all evening, fanning air past the casing to prevent
    it overheating. It survived the event but one of the dancers told me
    the next day that he had seen what we were doing and had spent the whole
    dance with his fingers crossed for us.

    In an amplifier with separate inaccessible heat sinks I would
    incorporate some form of thermal shut-down or power reduction. One
    excellent method is to use a thermistor as one element of a voltage
    divider in the signal path; as the temperature rises, the gain starts to reduce. I precede it by a soft clipper which doesn't operate on normal
    input levels. If the user tries to restore the excessive output by
    winding up the signal level, the clipper starts to operate and the
    output begins to sound distorted.

    Under 'field' conditions, this is a reasonable compromise because the
    system doesn't sudenly stop working. A bit of soft clipping can
    actually make the amplifier sound as though it is delivering more power
    than its undistorted rating.
    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Don Y@blockedofcourse@foo.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Mon Sep 29 18:43:16 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 9/29/2025 2:37 PM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    When Liz designs her amplifier, does she include notes telling the user
    how large a volume of space must surround it, for any given ambient?
    Or, does she just specify the ambient and leave it to the user to
    resolve that problem?

    I am normally the only user, so the problem doesn't arise. I designed

    Yes, the point I was making was how someone else, armed with "manufacturer notes" would handle the *use* of such a device. Like any other device
    one would purchase with anything but the flimsiest 1-page "spec sheet"
    defining intended operating conditions, dimensions, weight, etc.

    it so that with a 30% overload, the casing temperature would rise to 50
    C in a 20 C ambient. Above that temperature the operator woulld burn
    their fingers on the controls, so would be inclined to take some action
    to reduce the load. (It is a combined mixer and P.A. amplifier, so the operator would be constantly handling the controls.)

    My boxes have no user controls. They are *intended* to be hidden
    and controlled through other means.

    E.g., you want DVR functionality, you purchase some kit that provides
    it AND SITE IT SOMEWHERE IN YOUR LIVING SPACE. The power that it
    dissipates is a non-issue because it's sitting in that nice MASSIVE 25C
    ambient that is actively maintained at that temperature for the comfort
    of the creatures that occupy it.

    But, you don't strictly *need* to access controls on the device as
    some other interface could be presented, thereby allowing you to remove
    the "box" from cluttering up your living space.

    Even at that case temperature the output transistors would have their junctions well below the maximum-allowable temperature because they are
    run in paralleled pairs, so the thermal resistance between the junctions
    and the heat sink is much lower than it would be with a single device.
    The drop in current gain with output current is also reduced, so the
    driver stage has less work to do.

    My devices are safe as I actively manage their loads as well as the
    loads that I know are colocated. So, if a device that is *needed*, now,
    is warming due to some other device(s) located nearby, I can shutdown
    those other devices to remove that source of heat.

    But, this may (or may not) affect utility. In the degenerate case,
    only a single device per "constrained volume" could be operated.
    Relocating a device means rewiring; you can't just pick it up and site
    it somewhere else. So, you only want to resort to that remedy to
    protect the equipment (or the functionality *needed* at a given
    instant).

    I once had to use it badly overloaded, in emergency, for an evening
    dance in a large hall. Before we started I went to the rubbish area and
    tore a flap off a large cardboard box. Two of us took it in turns to
    sit in the 'wings' all evening, fanning air past the casing to prevent
    it overheating. It survived the event but one of the dancers told me
    the next day that he had seen what we were doing and had spent the whole dance with his fingers crossed for us.

    <grin> Next time, locate it in the center of the performance area and
    rely on the motion of the dancers surrounding it! ("All right, everyone, tonight we're going to wear BIG WINGS!! Flap away!!")

    In an amplifier with separate inaccessible heat sinks I would
    incorporate some form of thermal shut-down or power reduction. One
    excellent method is to use a thermistor as one element of a voltage
    divider in the signal path; as the temperature rises, the gain starts to reduce. I precede it by a soft clipper which doesn't operate on normal
    input levels. If the user tries to restore the excessive output by
    winding up the signal level, the clipper starts to operate and the
    output begins to sound distorted.

    Under 'field' conditions, this is a reasonable compromise because the
    system doesn't sudenly stop working. A bit of soft clipping can
    actually make the amplifier sound as though it is delivering more power
    than its undistorted rating.

    But what you really want is to know that it will be operated as you
    intended and not unduly stressed -- even if it can protect itself.

    Here, *I* am familiar with the spaces (volumes) available and how
    they are used. So, I know a space will be "unintentionally vented"
    with some frequency, just because these are spaces that are regularly
    accessed in the course of daily living. E.g., an opening door works
    well to dump the accumulated air mass out into "conditioned" space.

    [There is actually no space here that is truly "closed" that could
    be suitable for siting kit. Most homes aren't designed with such
    spaces -- other than "basements" or "attics" (non-living spaces).
    It's reasonable to assume the same applies to most (residential)
    floor plans. Closets tend to be located in bedrooms -- which tend to
    be hard to ventilate AND "off the beaten track" in terms of utility
    for such kit. Garages are great catchalls, but you have to design for
    40C ambients and hope the occupant doesn't decide to pile crap
    in the way of your hoped for air flow]

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From liz@liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) to sci.electronics.design on Tue Sep 30 08:40:19 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    On 9/29/2025 2:37 PM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    [...]
    If the user tries to restore the excessive output by
    winding up the signal level, the clipper starts to operate and the
    output begins to sound distorted.

    Under 'field' conditions, this is a reasonable compromise because the system doesn't sudenly stop working. A bit of soft clipping can
    actually make the amplifier sound as though it is delivering more power than its undistorted rating.

    But what you really want is to know that it will be operated as you
    intended and not unduly stressed -- even if it can protect itself.

    With portable P.A. work it is highly unlikely that the operator will
    bother to read any installation instructions or even be aware that they
    exist. I've never seen a P.A. operator consult a handbook (or its
    online equivalent). The equipment is put in a place that is convenient
    - if it doesn't work there, it is deemed faulty.

    Even with permanent installations I think the best you can hope for is
    to specify a maximum ambient temperature and the total wattage to be
    dissipated - that covers your back when it breaks down. Unless this is
    to be a major industrial installation, I doubt if anyone will bother to
    read what you have written (or understand what it means in practice).

    Your best bet is to assume the worst and leave lots of thermal headroom
    for when even-worse-than-the-worst happens..


    [There is actually no space here that is truly "closed" that could
    be suitable for siting kit. Most homes aren't designed with such
    spaces -- other than "basements" or "attics" (non-living spaces).
    It's reasonable to assume the same applies to most (residential)
    floor plans. Closets tend to be located in bedrooms -- which tend to
    be hard to ventilate AND "off the beaten track" in terms of utility
    for such kit. Garages are great catchalls, but you have to design for
    40C ambients and hope the occupant doesn't decide to pile crap
    in the way of your hoped for air flow]

    It sounds as though you are thinking of dumping kilowatts of heat into a domestic environment - or are you looking at two possible different uses
    for the equipment: single domestic units and bulk industrial ones?
    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Don Y@blockedofcourse@foo.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Tue Sep 30 01:19:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 9/30/2025 12:40 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    On 9/29/2025 2:37 PM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    But what you really want is to know that it will be operated as you
    intended and not unduly stressed -- even if it can protect itself.

    With portable P.A. work it is highly unlikely that the operator will
    bother to read any installation instructions or even be aware that they exist. I've never seen a P.A. operator consult a handbook (or its
    online equivalent). The equipment is put in a place that is convenient
    - if it doesn't work there, it is deemed faulty.

    You can remove the item if it fails to work -- lift it and
    place it in the back of your truck/car/van and be done with it.

    Even with permanent installations I think the best you can hope for is
    to specify a maximum ambient temperature and the total wattage to be dissipated - that covers your back when it breaks down. Unless this is
    to be a major industrial installation, I doubt if anyone will bother to
    read what you have written (or understand what it means in practice).

    Your best bet is to assume the worst and leave lots of thermal headroom
    for when even-worse-than-the-worst happens..

    In my case, there are "installers" -- in theory, people who have at least rule-of-thumb understandings of what is required of the environment and
    the potential consequences *to* the environment.

    When an HVAC system is installed, here, the installer is *supposed*
    to do a "Manual J" calculation to verify the plant is sized (heating + cooling) appropriately for the site.

    <https://aircondlounge.com/how-to-do-manual-j-calculation/>

    This attempts to quantify the hot/cold sources/sinks in and around the edifice, the characteristics of the floors, walls, ceiling, windows/doors, etc. to determine what the plant needs to provide to keep the interior "comfortable". Oversizing and undersizing the plant are discouraged -- they affect comfort
    and efficiency.

    NO ONE (professionally) does these calculations prior to quoting you for
    a new plant and its installation. Rule of thumb guesstimates are close enough that the Manual J calculation is just an extra formality -- they'd go through the motions for $1000 (literally). The details of one edifice vs another just get lost in the noise (how many square feet, what style elevation, lots of glass or just a little, etc. is enough to ballpark the plant to within a ton.)

    But, the many places where one can site kit *within* a building are significantly varied. E.g., my bedroom closets are full of equipment, not clothing so a closet of comparable size in a "normal" household would tolerate more added heat than mine would.

    At least, initially, I need to have some rules-of-thumb that let
    installers (that I will never see or interact with) to make "good"
    decisions about where to install kit. And, to guide architects
    to planning for spaces that would be good *sites* for such kit.

    [There is actually no space here that is truly "closed" that could
    be suitable for siting kit. Most homes aren't designed with such
    spaces -- other than "basements" or "attics" (non-living spaces).
    It's reasonable to assume the same applies to most (residential)
    floor plans. Closets tend to be located in bedrooms -- which tend to
    be hard to ventilate AND "off the beaten track" in terms of utility
    for such kit. Garages are great catchalls, but you have to design for
    40C ambients and hope the occupant doesn't decide to pile crap
    in the way of your hoped for air flow]

    It sounds as though you are thinking of dumping kilowatts of heat into a domestic environment - or are you looking at two possible different uses
    for the equipment: single domestic units and bulk industrial ones?

    The three use cases targeted initially are:
    - single family residences
    - small businesses
    - institutions

    The residences are the toughest targets because they are so varied and
    don't "budget" for this type of kit; no "paid staff" to address its needs! Those are addressed by calling out for service -- at $100-300 for a
    "null visit". A business or institution has likely invested in staff
    or "service contracts" in lieu of staff. But, how the equipment behaves shouldn't depend on the availability of "support staff" to address *its* problems!

    With forethought, it is relatively easy to have a sizeable "load"
    yet not have to worry too much about MOST of it.

    E.g., I use a shitload of cameras (a few hundred watts). But, most are
    located in non-living spaces. So, the power dumped in them is sunk to the "outdoor" environment instead of affecting something *in* the house. If a camera needs its Ir illuminator powered, it's likely NIGHT and cooler so the added power dissipated in the camera is compensated by the cooler ambient temperature.

    I don't have to power the RDBMS mirror during hours when other nearby loads
    are running -- wait until "off hours" to power it up and mirror the database. Shut it down when complete! (sure, if the primary RDBMS shits the bed
    while the mirror is powered down, SOME data can be lost -- anything not preserved in the WAL on the primary STORAGE node. But, that's a small
    risk compared to a big potential savings.)

    I don't have to retrain the speech recognizer and speaker identification algorithms on the conversations captured "today" -- until some time that
    is convenient for the system. I likely *don't* want to monitor the
    domestic water LEAKAGE until the building is "quiescent". Or, run the irrigation system when there will be large evaporative losses. I don't need
    to surveil the interior of the garage if the vehicle isn't going or coming.

    Etc.

    You don't have to power down the amplifier just because it isn't being
    used, NOW!

    When a device can "think" about the resources that it uses and that are available at any given instant, it can make more efficient use of those resources.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Don Y@blockedofcourse@foo.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Tue Sep 30 01:26:57 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 9/30/2025 1:19 AM, Don Y wrote:
    On 9/30/2025 12:40 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    On 9/29/2025 2:37 PM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    But what you really want is to know that it will be operated as you
    intended and not unduly stressed -- even if it can protect itself.

    With portable P.A. work it is highly unlikely that the operator-a will
    bother to read any installation instructions or even be aware that they
    exist.-a I've never seen a P.A. operator consult a handbook (or its
    online equivalent).-a The equipment is put in a place that is convenient
    - if it doesn't work there, it is deemed faulty.

    You can remove the item if it fails to work -- lift it and
    place it in the back of your truck/car/van and be done with it.

    When shopping for a new HVAC plant, one supplier cautioned me away from
    a particular brand saying "We're having problems with them, currently".

    The "problems" were ones of efficiency; the cooling units would
    side-step their more efficient capabilities (VFDs, etc.) under high temperatures. 27C being "high" (I don't think we ever experience
    a day that fails to reach that temperature, even in winter!)

    After 12 service calls at one particular site, the supplier opted to
    remove the equipment and replace it -- at his cost (along with each
    of these service calls covered by their installation warranty).
    *If* he is able to claim a credit for the "defective" equipment
    (something that is in litigation, presently), he will still have
    lost the cost of those 12 service calls (a few kilobucks) and the
    goodwill of the customer.

    What is it worth to him to NOT have the customer repeating their
    unfortunate experience with their personal/professional acquaintances?

    If you build a "thing" and your customer can just return it to the
    place of purchase, the incident is over pretty quickly -- he finds
    another comparable "thing" and moves on. If buying that thing
    requires people to enter your home to install it. Then, return
    multiple times to service it. Then, eventually having to have it
    REPLACED, what sort of taste does that leave in your mouth?

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From liz@liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) to sci.electronics.design on Tue Sep 30 11:03:47 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    On 9/30/2025 12:40 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    On 9/29/2025 2:37 PM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    But what you really want is to know that it will be operated as you
    intended and not unduly stressed -- even if it can protect itself.

    With portable P.A. work it is highly unlikely that the operator will bother to read any installation instructions or even be aware that they exist. I've never seen a P.A. operator consult a handbook (or its
    online equivalent). The equipment is put in a place that is convenient
    - if it doesn't work there, it is deemed faulty.

    You can remove the item if it fails to work -- lift it and
    place it in the back of your truck/car/van and be done with it.

    ...leaving the customer and hundreds of punters with no P.A.?

    Always carry at least two spares and be prepared to improvise or repair
    on the spot if things go wrong.


    When an HVAC system is installed, here, the installer is *supposed*
    to do a "Manual J" calculation to verify the plant is sized (heating + >cooling) appropriately for the site.

    That appears to be unique to the HVAC industry (at least in the UK) and
    to structural engineering - everything else, apart from major
    engineering projects, appears to be rule of thumb.
    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Don Y@blockedofcourse@foo.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Tue Sep 30 03:17:49 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 9/30/2025 3:03 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    On 9/30/2025 12:40 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    On 9/29/2025 2:37 PM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

    But what you really want is to know that it will be operated as you
    intended and not unduly stressed -- even if it can protect itself.

    With portable P.A. work it is highly unlikely that the operator will
    bother to read any installation instructions or even be aware that they
    exist. I've never seen a P.A. operator consult a handbook (or its
    online equivalent). The equipment is put in a place that is convenient
    - if it doesn't work there, it is deemed faulty.

    You can remove the item if it fails to work -- lift it and
    place it in the back of your truck/car/van and be done with it.

    ...leaving the customer and hundreds of punters with no P.A.?

    Always carry at least two spares and be prepared to improvise or repair
    on the spot if things go wrong.

    The point is, you have a "portable" device. You *can* replace it, carry
    a spare, etc. If you have hundreds of devices scattered around a site,
    WHICH spares do you carry? How long to identify the problem (esp if
    it is installation related; you can't just tell someone to stop
    using a space for a purpose that THEY have decided is appropriate)

    When an HVAC system is installed, here, the installer is *supposed*
    to do a "Manual J" calculation to verify the plant is sized (heating +
    cooling) appropriately for the site.

    That appears to be unique to the HVAC industry (at least in the UK) and
    to structural engineering - everything else, apart from major
    engineering projects, appears to be rule of thumb.

    In practice, it is *also* rule-of-thumb. E.g., I described one of my
    spaces to an HVAC guy, dimensions and power I expected to dissipate.
    He didn't hesitate to tell me how much air to move to keep it "cool".

    I had worked the math and had a similar answer. I.e., he didn't *need*
    to work the math. I want to know how he got to *his* answer without the detailed computations; what are the first order criteria that he uses
    to make his estimate?

    When I visit other folks' homes, I surreptitiously estimate where I
    could site kit in their homes and what sort of cooling would be required
    (along with how I could move air into those spaces, given where they are located in the residence). I can't drag out a tape rule and start
    taking detailed notes -- yet, need to assess whether or not their home
    would accommodate this sort of kit.

    What constitutes a "good fit"?

    When I estimate a hardware/software development effort, I know the
    issues that I use to gauge that effort -- without having to go to
    a lot of estimation. He likely has a similar cheat sheet.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From marika@marika5000@gmail.com to sci.electronics.design,alt.usenet.legends.lester-mosley on Sat Oct 11 20:12:09 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:
    On 27/09/2025 18:33, Don Y wrote:
    I want to model a heat load.-a I'm assuming I can simulate about 90% of
    the power delivered into a 100W bulb as being thrown off as heat?
    This, a cheaper alternative to lots of high power resistive loads...

    Electric fire bars are probably cheaper and much more robust for bigger loads. US 100v bulbs are a bit more efficient than UK 240v ones.

    I have used light bulbs as a heat source for terrariums.



    My dad built a duck house for his Muscovy. He used a light bulb to heat it during winter months. Unfortunately, the drake burned his bill sidling up
    to it.

    So, instead, he got one of those huge glass water bottles used in office drinking fountains, and filled it with boiling (near boiling? water. The
    glass is very thick unlike the more modern plastic ones, which eliminated possible scalding risks. The drake loved it.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2