• Re: Meloni su Ramelli Tutti devono fare i conti con la vicenda della sua morte

    From Gabx@nessuno@niente.null to alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.privacy, sci.crypt on Thu May 1 09:32:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.crypt

    Some people are not even worth answering, they make their day provoking with the hope of generating useless controversy.
    Rather I am interested in the evolution of defense systems.
    I find that remaining glued to the usual products from the windows95-98 era is perhaps only aesthetically pleasing, but has nothing to do with the privacy/anonymity issue.
    I find both Nym mixnet and Katzenpost very valid products with a preference for the second, as it is free but perhaps still too much in an initial state or am I wrong?

    Gabx

    --- Digital Signature --- 9ahGmziCtaQ6or83pz3h2Dhll3lTm4eFMcXU3MBYqjImfgtVA/94pt6bwpCicaIBtW3f5yJ6TjncOyx2ZD0ICA==
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mini Mailer@bounce.me@mini.mailer.msg to alt.privacy.anon-server,alt.privacy,sci.crypt on Thu May 1 10:34:43 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.crypt

    Gabx wrote:

    Some people are not even worth answering, they make their day provoking with the hope of generating useless controversy.
    Rather I am interested in the evolution of defense systems.
    I find that remaining glued to the usual products from the windows95-98 era is perhaps only aesthetically pleasing, but has nothing to do with the privacy/anonymity issue.
    I find both Nym mixnet and Katzenpost very valid products with a preference for the second, as it is free but perhaps still too much in an initial state or am I wrong?


    It's always the same, with those whiners...

    They can't accept new technology, which outperforms their
    old technology by lengths. We had that already when YAMN
    first appeared and Mixmaster users where complaining.

    Regarding Nym and Katzenpost. It takes already very long
    until we can test Katzenpost, while Nym can already been
    used for free.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Gabx@nobody@niente.null to alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.privacy, sci.crypt on Thu May 1 10:59:36 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.crypt

    Mini Mailer wrote:
    It's always the same, with those whiners

    Whiners, LOL, it's been a long time since I heard that name.
    However, even when you deal with technology which is synonymous with innovation, you have to compete with those who remain in the past, sigh, yes the past.
    It is human nature to remain anchored in the known rather than face the challenges of the future and therefore of what is not yet known, it is called fear.

    Gabx

    --- Digital Signature --- UV6WvXZ9ZhDA/RFrWOd7IDqA1+P4wXVaEVOxeFH2oPj7sc4+sKj6ld8Wrponp+N8VmGtYcMgFLJuoIll6+BvCw==
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nomen Nescio@nobody@dizum.com to alt.privacy,alt.privacy.anon-server,sci.crypt on Thu May 1 18:02:37 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.crypt

    Gabx <nobody@niente.null> wrote:

    Mini Mailer wrote:
    It's always the same, with those whiners

    Whiners, LOL, it's been a long time since I heard that name.
    However, even when you deal with technology which is synonymous with innovation, you have to compete with those who remain in the past, sigh, yes the past.
    It is human nature to remain anchored in the known rather than face the challenges of the future and therefore of what is not yet known, it is called fear.


    A few questions about the Nym Technologies network to overcome concerns:

    - Through how many anonymizing nodes is a Nym message routed?

    - With how many encryption layers do SURBs protect the user's identity?

    - Is it conceivable, that TLAs urge mix node operators to decrypt SURBs?

    - Are one-way messages, where the sender doesn't expect any reply, also
    accompanied by a reply block?

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2