• Taylor Townsend apologizes for videos calling Chinese cuisine 'crazy'

    From jdeluise@jdeluise@gmail.com to rec.sport.tennis on Wed Sep 17 08:45:04 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis


    https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/taylor-townsend-apologizes-videos-calling-101607522.html

    The comments weren't worth an apology, imo.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sawfish@sawfish666@gmail.com to rec.sport.tennis on Wed Sep 17 09:54:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    On 9/17/25 9:45 AM, jdeluise wrote:

    https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/taylor-townsend-apologizes-videos- calling-101607522.html

    The comments weren't worth an apology, imo.

    I agree and the comment following the apology, from "James Hansen,
    senior tennis editor" show that he's a woke pussy.
    --
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    "Open the pod bay doors, HAL."

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sawfish@sawfish666@gmail.com to rec.sport.tennis on Wed Sep 17 10:29:26 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    On 9/17/25 9:45 AM, jdeluise wrote:

    https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/taylor-townsend-apologizes-videos- calling-101607522.html

    The comments weren't worth an apology, imo.

    ...but you know, her remarks do indeed sound like someone who lacks both education and class...

    Jus' sayin'...
    --
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    "Open the pod bay doors, HAL."

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jdeluise@jdeluise@gmail.com to rec.sport.tennis on Thu Sep 18 07:38:34 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 9/17/25 9:45 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/taylor-townsend-apologizes-videos-
    calling-101607522.html
    The comments weren't worth an apology, imo.

    I agree and the comment following the apology, from "James
    Hansen,
    senior tennis editor" show that he's a woke pussy.

    True, but not as woke as the people offended by Jimmy Kimmel's
    comments.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sawfish@sawfish666@gmail.com to rec.sport.tennis on Thu Sep 18 08:47:46 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    On 9/18/25 8:38 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 9/17/25 9:45 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/taylor-townsend-apologizes-videos-
    calling-101607522.html
    The comments weren't worth an apology, imo.

    I agree and the comment following the apology, from "James Hansen,
    senior tennis editor" show that he's a woke pussy.

    True, but not as woke as the people offended by Jimmy Kimmel's comments.

    The whole thing, 2nd Trump, is becoming very scary.

    But, you know, we'll just have to lump thru it as best we can...

    ...if we can.
    --
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    "Open the pod bay doors, HAL."

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From *skriptis@skriptis@post.t-com.hr to rec.sport.tennis on Thu Sep 18 18:15:30 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    ------=_Part_0_69041015.1758212130851
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
    On 9/18/25 8:38 AM, jdeluise wrote:> Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:> >> On 9/17/25 9:45 AM, jdeluise wrote:>>> https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/taylor-townsend-apologizes-videos->>> calling-101607522.html>>> The comments weren't worth an apology, imo.>>>> I agree and the comment following the apology, from "James Hansen,>> senior tennis editor" show that he's a woke pussy.> > True, but not as woke as the people offended by Jimmy Kimmel's comments.The whole thing, 2nd Trump, is becoming very scary.But, you know, we'll just have to lump thru it as best we can......if we can.-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"Open the pod bay doors, HAL."~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


    Yes you can, lol
    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html ------=_Part_0_69041015.1758212130851--
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sawfish@sawfish666@gmail.com to rec.sport.tennis on Thu Sep 18 10:17:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    On 9/18/25 9:15 AM, *skriptis wrote:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
    On 9/18/25 8:38 AM, jdeluise wrote:> Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:> >> On 9/17/25 9:45 AM, jdeluise wrote:>>> https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/taylor-townsend-apologizes-videos->>> calling-101607522.html>>> The comments weren't worth an apology, imo.>>>> I agree and the comment following the apology, from "James Hansen,>> senior tennis editor" show that he's a woke pussy.> > True, but not as woke as the people offended by Jimmy Kimmel's comments.The whole thing, 2nd Trump, is becoming very scary.But, you know, we'll just have to lump thru it as best we can......if we can.-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"Open the pod bay doors, HAL."~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


    Yes you can, lol

    I think it's a real interesting conversation, listing Trump's actions
    that indicate a strong push towards authoritarian order, and possibly a
    major shift in the way the US is governed.

    People here on RST should by now know that I tend to see things as an
    observer of major events, a non-actor. This means that I'm not ascribing good/bad, right/wrong, just evaluating the events for what this means to me--the quality of my life and that of my family. So I see X happening,
    check if I can exercise any control on it, and if not, how to adapt or
    avoid. It's like hearing about a hurricane: I can't affect it, but I
    can run away or stay.

    It's that simple because that's the way it is now in the US. It has not
    been socially cooperative since at least the 80s. I don't care what the
    causes of this destruction of social trust were/are (I have opinions,
    but that's simply finger-pointing after the fact) all I need to know is
    that I cannot unilaterally reverse it, realistically I have to live in
    it, so what the fuck is my best course toward continued survival and
    success?

    *That* shit I do indeed have some level of control over, and it's where
    I spend my time. Discussions here are a form of recreation and a bit of
    a reality check--pinging for a response to see what the signal contains.

    So far it looks to me that:

    1) Trump has used the military--or quasi-miltary--in dissenting urban
    centers on the pretext of lawlessness, including both criminal and
    immigration violations. He has gotten some pushback from local officials
    and courts, but he does not pull the forces until *he* say so.

    2) Behind the scenes he has pressured various institutions--educational, business--to reverse their policies on whatever it is he thinks provides
    the most cover. This has the twofold effect of pleasing his popular power-base, and more importantly to him, administering payback for real
    or perceived personal affronts.

    3) He has removed protection from various political opponents, so that
    they have to worry that either some nut case--of which there are plenty
    here, well-armed and willing--will take a shot at them, or perhaps
    something even more pernicious.

    4) Thusfar he does not seem to be courting traditional political support
    thru elected intermediaries, which indicates that he thinks that what he
    is doing, or intending, will not need their support or co-operation. It
    will be unilateral.

    5) Lastly and maybe most significantly, Trump does not "play nice".
    Every other major US political leader within my lifetime has attempted
    to portray that however radical he is, he has a heart and means well.
    Trump does not bother projecting this, at all. He projects that he's
    *right* and will do as he sees fit. Period.

    So what does all this tell someone observing and who has been around the
    block many many times before?

    We're going to get two independent indicators of where he intends to go.
    The first will be how he handles the 2026 mid-terms: will he try to win popular support thru the ballot? If he appears to give up on that, you
    can infer what this means.

    The second will be if he ignores the judicial system. So far he mostly
    appeals rulings against him to a higher court, and in the interim keeps
    doing what he did. While the supreme court is not beholden to him (he
    can't fire him), and they are not personal friends or loyalists, they
    are mostly conservative or traditionalist and their natural *tendency*
    is to back him so long as he seems to adhere to traditional
    socio-political precepts. But if they see where he arbitrarily removes
    secret service protection from his political enemies, this will give
    them pause, I think. But the ultimate test vis-a-vis the judicial branch
    will be if he de facto ignores SCOTUS rulings against him. I would
    suppose that if he does, it will be masked: he'll *say* he's adhering to
    their ruling to some degree, but will continue his policy all the while characterizing it as compliance.

    And ya know what? I think that a slim majority, or a very sizable
    plurality of the citizenry will actually support this. They are that
    tired of mealy-mouthed indecisive and weak national leadership.
    --
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    "Open the pod bay doors, HAL."

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From *skriptis@skriptis@post.t-com.hr to rec.sport.tennis on Thu Sep 18 20:11:04 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    ------=_Part_0_258880439.1758219064667
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
    On 9/18/25 9:15 AM, *skriptis wrote:> Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrot=
    e in message:r>> On 9/18/25 8:38 AM, jdeluise wrote:> Sawfish <sawfish666@g= mail.com> writes:> >> On 9/17/25 9:45 AM, jdeluise wrote:>>> https://www.ya= hoo.com/sports/article/taylor-townsend-apologizes-videos->>> calling-101607= 522.html>>> The comments weren't worth an apology, imo.>>>> I agree and the=
    comment following the apology, from "James Hansen,>> senior tennis editor"=
    show that he's a woke pussy.> > True, but not as woke as the people offend=
    ed by Jimmy Kimmel's comments.The whole thing, 2nd Trump, is becoming very = scary.But, you know, we'll just have to lump thru it as best we can......if=
    we can.-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~= ~~~~~~~~~~~"Open the pod bay doors, HAL."~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~= ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~> > > Yes you can, lolI think it's=
    a real interesting conversation, listing Trump's actions that indicate a s= trong push towards authoritarian order, and possibly a major shift in the w=
    ay the US is governed.People here on RST should by now know that I tend to = see things as an observer of major events, a non-actor. This means that I'm=
    not ascribing good/bad, right/wrong, just evaluating the events for what t= his means to me--the quality of my life and that of my family. So I see X h= appening, check if I can exercise any control on it, and if not, how to ada=
    pt or avoid. It's like hearing about a hurricane: I can't affect it, but I=
    can run away or stay.It's that simple because that's the way it is now in = the US. It has not been socially cooperative since at least the 80s. I don'=
    t care what the causes of this destruction of social trust were/are (I have=
    opinions, but that's simply finger-pointing after the fact) all I need to = know is that I cannot unilaterally reverse it, realistically I have to live=
    in it, so what the fuck is my best course toward continued survival and su= ccess?*That* shit I do indeed have some level of control over, and it's whe=
    re I spend my time. Discussions here are a form of recreation and a bit of =
    a reality check--pinging for a response to see what the signal contains.So = far it looks to me that:1) Trump has used the military--or quasi-miltary--i=
    n dissenting urban centers on the pretext of lawlessness, including both cr= iminal and immigration violations. He has gotten some pushback from local o= fficials and courts, but he does not pull the forces until *he* say so.2) B= ehind the scenes he has pressured various institutions--educational, busine= ss--to reverse their policies on whatever it is he thinks provides the most=
    cover. This has the twofold effect of pleasing his popular power-base, and=
    more importantly to him, administering payback for real or perceived perso= nal affronts.3) He has removed protection from various political opponents,=
    so that they have to worry that either some nut case--of which there are p= lenty here, well-armed and willing--will take a shot at them, or perhaps so= mething even more pernicious.4) Thusfar he does not seem to be courting tra= ditional political support thru elected intermediaries, which indicates tha=
    t he thinks that what he is doing, or intending, will not need their suppor=
    t or co-operation. It will be unilateral.5) Lastly and maybe most significa= ntly, Trump does not "play nice". Every other major US political leader wit= hin my lifetime has attempted to portray that however radical he is, he has=
    a heart and means well. Trump does not bother projecting this, at all. He = projects that he's *right* and will do as he sees fit. Period.So what does = all this tell someone observing and who has been around the block many many=
    times before?We're going to get two independent indicators of where he int= ends to go. The first will be how he handles the 2026 mid-terms: will he tr=
    y to win popular support thru the ballot? If he appears to give up on that,=
    you can infer what this means.The second will be if he ignores the judicia=
    l system. So far he mostly appeals rulings against him to a higher court, a=
    nd in the interim keeps doing what he did. While the supreme court is not b= eholden to him (he can't fire him), and they are not personal friends or lo= yalists, they are mostly conservative or traditionalist and their natural *= tendency* is to back him so long as he seems to adhere to traditional socio= -political precepts. But if they see where he arbitrarily removes secret se= rvice protection from his political enemies, this will give them pause, I t= hink. But the ultimate test vis-a-vis the judicial branch will be if he de = facto ignores SCOTUS rulings against him. I would suppose that if he does, =
    it will be masked: he'll *say* he's adhering to their ruling to some degree=
    , but will continue his policy all the while characterizing it as complianc= e.And ya know what? I think that a slim majority, or a very sizable plurali=
    ty of the citizenry will actually support this. They are that tired of meal= y-mouthed indecisive and weak national leadership.-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~= ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"Open the pod bay door=
    s, HAL."~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~= ~~~~~~~~



    This is all thanks to Townsend who can't appreciate turtle soup?
    --=20




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html ------=_Part_0_258880439.1758219064667--
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sawfish@sawfish666@gmail.com to rec.sport.tennis on Thu Sep 18 12:11:21 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    On 9/18/25 11:11 AM, *skriptis wrote:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
    On 9/18/25 9:15 AM, *skriptis wrote:> Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>> On 9/18/25 8:38 AM, jdeluise wrote:> Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:> >> On 9/17/25 9:45 AM, jdeluise wrote:>>> https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/taylor-townsend-apologizes-videos->>> calling-101607522.html>>> The comments weren't worth an apology, imo.>>>> I agree and the comment following the apology, from "James Hansen,>> senior tennis editor" show that he's a woke pussy.> > True, but not as woke as the people offended by Jimmy Kimmel's comments.The whole thing, 2nd Trump, is becoming very scary.But, you know, we'll just have to lump thru it as best we can......if we can.-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"Open the pod bay doors, HAL."~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~> > > Yes you can, lolI think it's a real interesting conversation, listing Trump's actions that indicate a strong push towards authoritarian order, and possibly a major shift in the way the US is governed.People here on RST should by now know that I tend to see things as an observer of major events, a non-actor. This means that I'm not ascribing good/bad, right/wrong, just evaluating the events for what this means to me--the quality of my life and that of my family. So I see X happening, check if I can exercise any control on it, and if not, how to adapt or avoid. It's like hearing about a hurricane: I can't affect it, but I can run away or stay.It's that simple because that's the way it is now in the US. It has not been socially cooperative since at least the 80s. I don't care what the causes of this destruction of social trust were/are (I have opinions, but that's simply finger-pointing after the fact) all I need to know is that I cannot unilaterally reverse it, realistically I have to live in it, so what the fuck is my best course toward continued survival and success?*That* shit I do indeed have some level of control over, and it's where I spend my time. Discussions here are a form of recreation and a bit of a reality check--pinging for a response to see what the signal contains.So far it looks to me that:1) Trump has used the military--or quasi-miltary--in dissenting urban centers on the pretext of lawlessness, including both criminal and immigration violations. He has gotten some pushback from local officials and courts, but he does not pull the forces until *he* say so.2) Behind the scenes he has pressured various institutions--educational, business--to reverse their policies on whatever it is he thinks provides the most cover. This has the twofold effect of pleasing his popular power-base, and more importantly to him, administering payback for real or perceived personal affronts.3) He has removed protection from various political opponents, so that they have to worry that either some nut case--of which there are plenty here, well-armed and willing--will take a shot at them, or perhaps something even more pernicious.4) Thusfar he does not seem to be courting traditional political support thru elected intermediaries, which indicates that he thinks that what he is doing, or intending, will not need their support or co-operation. It will be unilateral.5) Lastly and maybe most significantly, Trump does not "play nice". Every other major US political leader within my lifetime has attempted to portray that however radical he is, he has a heart and means well. Trump does not bother projecting this, at all. He projects that he's *right* and will do as he sees fit. Period.So what does all this tell someone observing and who has been around the block many many times before?We're going to get two independent indicators of where he intends to go. The first will be how he handles the 2026 mid-terms: will he try to win popular support thru the ballot? If he appears to give up on that, you can infer what this means.The second will be if he ignores the judicial system. So far he mostly appeals rulings against him to a higher court, and in the interim keeps doing what he did. While the supreme court is not beholden to him (he can't fire him), and they are not personal friends or loyalists, they are mostly conservative or traditionalist and their natural *tendency* is to back him so long as he seems to adhere to traditional socio-political precepts. But if they see where he arbitrarily removes secret service protection from his political enemies, this will give them pause, I think. But the ultimate test vis-a-vis the judicial branch will be if he de facto ignores SCOTUS rulings against him. I would suppose that if he does, it will be masked: he'll *say* he's adhering to their ruling to some degree, but will continue his policy all the while characterizing it as compliance.And ya know what? I think that a slim majority, or a very sizable plurality of the citizenry will actually support this. They are that tired of mealy-mouthed indecisive and weak national leadership.-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"Open the pod bay doors, HAL."~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



    This is all thanks to Townsend who can't appreciate turtle soup?

    Hah!
    --
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    "Open the pod bay doors, HAL."

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jdeluise@jdeluise@gmail.com to rec.sport.tennis on Thu Sep 18 14:13:25 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 9/18/25 8:38 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 9/17/25 9:45 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/taylor-townsend-apologizes-videos- >>>> calling-101607522.html
    The comments weren't worth an apology, imo.

    I agree and the comment following the apology, from "James
    Hansen,
    senior tennis editor" show that he's a woke pussy.
    True, but not as woke as the people offended by Jimmy Kimmel's
    comments.

    The whole thing, 2nd Trump, is becoming very scary.

    But, you know, we'll just have to lump thru it as best we can...

    ...if we can.

    The only thing I can do is cancel Hulu. But that's OK, I'm
    personally offended by this travesty of a show "Alien: Earth" ;)
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sawfish@sawfish666@gmail.com to rec.sport.tennis on Thu Sep 18 15:54:09 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    On 9/18/25 3:13 PM, jdeluise wrote:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 9/18/25 8:38 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 9/17/25 9:45 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/taylor-townsend-apologizes-
    videos-
    calling-101607522.html
    The comments weren't worth an apology, imo.

    I agree and the comment following the apology, from "James Hansen,
    senior tennis editor" show that he's a woke pussy.
    True, but not as woke as the people offended by Jimmy Kimmel's
    comments.

    The whole thing, 2nd Trump, is becoming very scary.

    But, you know, we'll just have to lump thru it as best we can...

    ...if we can.

    The only thing I can do is cancel Hulu.-a But that's OK, I'm personally offended by this travesty of a show "Alien: Earth" ;)

    There you go. *That's* what I'm talking about.
    --
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    "Open the pod bay doors, HAL."

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From TT@TT@dprk.kp to rec.sport.tennis on Sat Sep 20 00:48:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    jdeluise kirjoitti 19.9.2025 klo 1.13:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 9/18/25 8:38 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 9/17/25 9:45 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/taylor-townsend-apologizes-
    videos-
    calling-101607522.html
    The comments weren't worth an apology, imo.

    I agree and the comment following the apology, from "James Hansen,
    senior tennis editor" show that he's a woke pussy.
    True, but not as woke as the people offended by Jimmy Kimmel's
    comments.

    The whole thing, 2nd Trump, is becoming very scary.

    But, you know, we'll just have to lump thru it as best we can...

    ...if we can.

    The only thing I can do is cancel Hulu.-a But that's OK, I'm personally offended by this travesty of a show "Alien: Earth" ;)

    I've so far liked Alien Earth, feeling it has some potential. The alien
    eye is definitely neat character.
    Then again there are only 2 episodes left which I haven't seen (haven't watched EP 7 yet, but I think I'll watch it now) and the potential is
    still waiting to be capitalized.
    To be continued...
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sawfish@sawfish666@gmail.com to rec.sport.tennis on Fri Sep 19 16:03:19 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    On 9/19/25 2:48 PM, TT wrote:
    jdeluise kirjoitti 19.9.2025 klo 1.13:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 9/18/25 8:38 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 9/17/25 9:45 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/taylor-townsend-apologizes-
    videos-
    calling-101607522.html
    The comments weren't worth an apology, imo.

    I agree and the comment following the apology, from "James Hansen,
    senior tennis editor" show that he's a woke pussy.
    True, but not as woke as the people offended by Jimmy Kimmel's
    comments.

    The whole thing, 2nd Trump, is becoming very scary.

    But, you know, we'll just have to lump thru it as best we can...

    ...if we can.

    The only thing I can do is cancel Hulu.-a But that's OK, I'm personally
    offended by this travesty of a show "Alien: Earth" ;)

    I've so far liked Alien Earth, feeling it has some potential. The alien
    eye is definitely neat character.
    Then again there are only 2 episodes left which I haven't seen (haven't watched EP 7 yet, but I think I'll watch it now) and the potential is
    still waiting to be capitalized.
    To be continued...

    I read the premise on wikipedia:

    "The opening of the first episode introduces the premise of the series
    as involving three separate destinies for the immortality of mankind.
    These are:[4]

    Cybernetically enhanced humans: Cyborgs
    Artificially intelligent beings: Synthetics (Synths)
    Synthetic beings with downloaded human consciousness: Hybrids"

    Under which of these does mass 3rd world immigration to northern and
    western Europe and the US and UK fall?
    --
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    "Open the pod bay doors, HAL."

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From TT@TT@dprk.kp to rec.sport.tennis on Sat Sep 20 08:37:52 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    Sawfish kirjoitti 20.9.2025 klo 2.03:
    On 9/19/25 2:48 PM, TT wrote:
    jdeluise kirjoitti 19.9.2025 klo 1.13:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 9/18/25 8:38 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 9/17/25 9:45 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/taylor-townsend-apologizes- >>>>>>> videos-
    calling-101607522.html
    The comments weren't worth an apology, imo.

    I agree and the comment following the apology, from "James Hansen, >>>>>> senior tennis editor" show that he's a woke pussy.
    True, but not as woke as the people offended by Jimmy Kimmel's
    comments.

    The whole thing, 2nd Trump, is becoming very scary.

    But, you know, we'll just have to lump thru it as best we can...

    ...if we can.

    The only thing I can do is cancel Hulu.-a But that's OK, I'm
    personally offended by this travesty of a show "Alien: Earth" ;)

    I've so far liked Alien Earth, feeling it has some potential. The
    alien eye is definitely neat character.
    Then again there are only 2 episodes left which I haven't seen
    (haven't watched EP 7 yet, but I think I'll watch it now) and the
    potential is still waiting to be capitalized.
    To be continued...

    I read the premise on wikipedia:

    "The opening of the first episode introduces the premise of the series
    as involving three separate destinies for the immortality of mankind.
    These are:[4]

    Cybernetically enhanced humans: Cyborgs
    Artificially intelligent beings: Synthetics (Synths)
    Synthetic beings with downloaded human consciousness: Hybrids"

    Under which of these does mass 3rd world immigration to northern and
    western Europe-a and the US and UK fall?


    Hybrids. Part of the hybrid warfare against the west.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jdeluise@jdeluise@gmail.com to rec.sport.tennis on Fri Sep 19 21:42:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:

    jdeluise kirjoitti 19.9.2025 klo 1.13:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 9/18/25 8:38 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 9/17/25 9:45 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/taylor-townsend-apologizes-
    videos-
    calling-101607522.html
    The comments weren't worth an apology, imo.

    I agree and the comment following the apology, from "James
    Hansen,
    senior tennis editor" show that he's a woke pussy.
    True, but not as woke as the people offended by Jimmy
    Kimmel's
    comments.

    The whole thing, 2nd Trump, is becoming very scary.

    But, you know, we'll just have to lump thru it as best we
    can...

    ...if we can.
    The only thing I can do is cancel Hulu.-a But that's OK, I'm
    personally offended by this travesty of a show "Alien: Earth"
    ;)

    I've so far liked Alien Earth, feeling it has some
    potential. The
    alien eye is definitely neat character.
    Then again there are only 2 episodes left which I haven't seen
    (haven't watched EP 7 yet, but I think I'll watch it now) and
    the
    potential is still waiting to be capitalized.
    To be continued...

    ---SPOILER ALERT---

    The atmosphere and nostalgia from the original movie are there.
    And yes, it does try to look cool and all, but come on... 70s
    style CRT displays, flashing lights, and buckling spring keyboards
    coexisting in a world with interstellar travel and the technology
    to download children's brains into superhuman "hybrids" (which
    never existed in any of the movies)? Obviously when the movie was
    released this makes sense, now it just looks like a gimmick.

    And these "hybrids"...come on, Wendy is like 10 years old mentally
    but fearlessly tears a Xenomorph limb from limb on her first
    encounter with one. She can understand and "talk" to them in
    their own "language" and can apparently sic them on her foes?
    This "Wendy" single-handedly destroyed the mythos of the Xenomorph
    as the "perfect organism" and ruthless killing machine. Why would
    the writers do that? For girl power? Is she Buffy the Vampire
    Slayer or something? On that note, it does feel more like a
    superhero series than "Alien".

    The story is also full of glaring plot holes. In an early
    episode, they made a point to show that Prodigy is monitoring all
    of the hybrids' vision. Yet in later episodes this fact is
    conveniently ignored... hell, one of them is busy scheming with
    the enemy and arranging for humans to get the facehugger
    treatment. Nobody heard/saw?!

    I just can't forgive the writers for seeming to go out of their
    way to make the xenomorph seems weak and powerless most of the
    time, except when Wendy is ordering it around. THEN it can wipe
    out an entire squad of highly trained soldiers with assault rifles
    in 15 seconds flat.

    It reminds me a bit of what Orson Scott Card did to Ender (from
    the "Ender's Game" series) in the later "Bean" series. He
    retconned Bean into a supergenius who single-handedly and
    perfectly arranged EVERYTHING behind the scenes so that the
    hapless idiot Ender could luck his way into beating the buggers
    and taking all the credit for himself. This is apparently what
    Bean, the Black, ex-street urchin wanted all along.. LOL!

    OK, I do like some things. I agree the "eyeball alien" is well
    done. Timothy Olyphant is good in his role. A bit of an unusual
    role for him but well done. I also like the actor who plays the
    caricature of a billionaire young tech bro... good villain, over
    the top yet somehow believable.

    Anyway, it's kept me watching so far. Mostly to curse and throw
    popcorn at the screen. This is some other kind of TV show wrapped
    in "Alien" dressing. And it's pretty woke, I'd think an
    arch-conservative like you would hate it!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jdeluise@jdeluise@gmail.com to rec.sport.tennis on Fri Sep 19 21:56:25 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com> writes:

    TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:

    jdeluise kirjoitti 19.9.2025 klo 1.13:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 9/18/25 8:38 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 9/17/25 9:45 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/taylor-townsend-apologizes- >>>>>>> videos-
    calling-101607522.html
    The comments weren't worth an apology, imo.

    I agree and the comment following the apology, from "James
    Hansen,
    senior tennis editor" show that he's a woke pussy.
    True, but not as woke as the people offended by Jimmy
    Kimmel's
    comments.

    The whole thing, 2nd Trump, is becoming very scary.

    But, you know, we'll just have to lump thru it as best we
    can...

    ...if we can.
    The only thing I can do is cancel Hulu.-a But that's OK, I'm
    personally offended by this travesty of a show "Alien: Earth"
    ;)

    I've so far liked Alien Earth, feeling it has some
    potential. The
    alien eye is definitely neat character.
    Then again there are only 2 episodes left which I haven't seen
    (haven't watched EP 7 yet, but I think I'll watch it now) and
    the
    potential is still waiting to be capitalized.
    To be continued...

    ---SPOILER ALERT---

    The atmosphere and nostalgia from the original movie are
    there. And
    yes, it does try to look cool and all, but come on... 70s style
    CRT
    displays, flashing lights, and buckling spring keyboards
    coexisting in
    a world with interstellar travel and the technology to download
    children's brains into superhuman "hybrids" (which never existed
    in
    any of the movies)? Obviously when the movie was released this
    makes
    sense, now it just looks like a gimmick.

    And these "hybrids"...come on, Wendy is like 10 years old
    mentally but
    fearlessly tears a Xenomorph limb from limb on her first
    encounter
    with one. She can understand and "talk" to them in their own
    "language" and can apparently sic them on her foes? This "Wendy" single-handedly destroyed the mythos of the Xenomorph as the
    "perfect
    organism" and ruthless killing machine. Why would the writers
    do
    that? For girl power? Is she Buffy the Vampire Slayer or
    something?
    On that note, it does feel more like a superhero series than
    "Alien".

    The story is also full of glaring plot holes. In an early
    episode,
    they made a point to show that Prodigy is monitoring all of the
    hybrids' vision. Yet in later episodes this fact is
    conveniently
    ignored... hell, one of them is busy scheming with the enemy and
    arranging for humans to get the facehugger treatment. Nobody
    heard/saw?!

    I just can't forgive the writers for seeming to go out of their
    way to
    make the xenomorph seems weak and powerless most of the time,
    except
    when Wendy is ordering it around. THEN it can wipe out an
    entire
    squad of highly trained soldiers with assault rifles in 15
    seconds
    flat.

    It reminds me a bit of what Orson Scott Card did to Ender (from
    the
    "Ender's Game" series) in the later "Bean" series. He retconned
    Bean
    into a supergenius who single-handedly and perfectly arranged
    EVERYTHING behind the scenes so that the hapless idiot Ender
    could
    luck his way into beating the buggers and taking all the credit
    for
    himself. This is apparently what Bean, the Black, ex-street
    urchin
    wanted all along.. LOL!

    OK, I do like some things. I agree the "eyeball alien" is well
    done.
    Timothy Olyphant is good in his role. A bit of an unusual role
    for
    him but well done. I also like the actor who plays the
    caricature of
    a billionaire young tech bro... good villain, over the top yet
    somehow
    believable.

    Anyway, it's kept me watching so far. Mostly to curse and throw
    popcorn at the screen. This is some other kind of TV show
    wrapped in
    "Alien" dressing. And it's pretty woke, I'd think an
    arch-conservative like you would hate it!

    I will add this, in some ways it was better than I expected. It's
    extremely well made technically.... the special effects, the
    atmosphere, the sets are great. Overall the acting is pretty good
    too, especially for a tv series. Too bad the writing is total
    crap (in my opinion). But I only really liked Alien and Aliens,
    the rest were utter shite. So my expectations were really low for
    this.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jdeluise@jdeluise@gmail.com to rec.sport.tennis on Fri Sep 19 23:01:38 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com> writes:


    I just can't forgive the writers for seeming to go out of their
    way to
    make the xenomorph seems weak and powerless most of the time,
    except
    when Wendy is ordering it around. THEN it can wipe out an
    entire
    squad of highly trained soldiers with assault rifles in 15
    seconds
    flat.

    It reminds me a bit of what Orson Scott Card did to Ender (from
    the
    "Ender's Game" series) in the later "Bean" series. He retconned
    Bean
    into a supergenius who single-handedly and perfectly arranged
    EVERYTHING behind the scenes so that the hapless idiot Ender
    could
    luck his way into beating the buggers and taking all the credit
    for
    himself. This is apparently what Bean, the Black, ex-street
    urchin
    wanted all along.. LOL!

    And it's the same thing in this new "Superman".... Superman's
    fighting with a godzilla sized fire-breathing monster stomping
    through town above throngs of people, and Superman says to some
    teenage metahuman fighting alongside him, "Oh gosh (no shit!), I'm
    trying to figure out how I can get him out of here without killing
    him. you know, maybe so we could study him". WTF!? Ultimately
    they kill him off while Superman's standing around thinking.
    Superman's only purpose was to push people out of the way and
    gently set down the monster before he falls on the crowd!?

    AI says it was done intentionally, to show a vulnerable, relatable
    Superman who's willing to show his emotional side to connect with
    the audience. And to address the perception that he's depicted as
    overpowered and boring most of the time. I guess the answer was
    to make him a prudish and indecisive karen?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jdeluise@jdeluise@gmail.com to rec.sport.tennis on Fri Sep 19 23:25:42 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com> writes:



    AI says it was done intentionally, to show a vulnerable,
    relatable
    Superman who's willing to show his emotional side to connect
    with the
    audience. And to address the perception that he's depicted as
    overpowered and boring most of the time. I guess the answer was
    to
    make him a prudish and indecisive karen?

    OMG, now he's being sent to CECOT (essentially), alongside a
    million monkeys tweeting. hahaha!!!!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sawfish@sawfish666@gmail.com to rec.sport.tennis on Sat Sep 20 08:59:05 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    On 9/19/25 10:42 PM, jdeluise wrote:
    TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:

    jdeluise kirjoitti 19.9.2025 klo 1.13:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 9/18/25 8:38 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 9/17/25 9:45 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/taylor-townsend-apologizes- >>>>>>> videos-
    calling-101607522.html
    The comments weren't worth an apology, imo.

    I agree and the comment following the apology, from "James Hansen, >>>>>> senior tennis editor" show that he's a woke pussy.
    True, but not as woke as the people offended by Jimmy Kimmel's
    comments.

    The whole thing, 2nd Trump, is becoming very scary.

    But, you know, we'll just have to lump thru it as best we can...

    ...if we can.
    The only thing I can do is cancel Hulu.-a But that's OK, I'm
    personally offended by this travesty of a show "Alien: Earth" ;)

    I've so far liked Alien Earth, feeling it has some potential. The
    alien eye is definitely neat character.
    Then again there are only 2 episodes left which I haven't seen
    (haven't watched EP 7 yet, but I think I'll watch it now) and the
    potential is still waiting to be capitalized.
    To be continued...

    ---SPOILER ALERT---

    The atmosphere and nostalgia from the original movie are there. And yes,
    it does try to look cool and all, but come on... 70s style CRT displays, flashing lights, and buckling spring keyboards coexisting in a world
    with interstellar travel and the technology to download children's
    brains into superhuman "hybrids" (which never existed in any of the movies)?-a Obviously when the movie was released this makes sense, now it just looks like a gimmick.

    And these "hybrids"...come on, Wendy is like 10 years old mentally but fearlessly tears a Xenomorph limb from limb on her first encounter with one.-a She can understand and "talk" to them in their own "language" and
    can apparently sic them on her foes? This "Wendy" single-handedly
    destroyed the mythos of the Xenomorph as the "perfect organism" and
    ruthless killing machine.-a Why would the writers do that?-a For girl power?-a Is she Buffy the Vampire Slayer or something?-a On that note, it does feel more like a superhero series than "Alien".

    Sweet Jesus...


    The story is also full of glaring plot holes.-a In an early episode, they made a point to show that Prodigy is monitoring all of the hybrids' vision.-a Yet in later episodes this fact is conveniently ignored...
    hell, one of them is busy scheming with the enemy and arranging for
    humans to get the facehugger treatment.-a Nobody heard/saw?!

    I just can't forgive the writers for seeming to go out of their way to
    make the xenomorph seems weak and powerless most of the time, except
    when Wendy is ordering it around.-a THEN it can wipe out an entire squad
    of highly trained soldiers with assault rifles in 15 seconds flat.

    It reminds me a bit of what Orson Scott Card did to Ender (from the
    "Ender's Game" series) in the later "Bean" series.-a He retconned Bean
    into a supergenius who single-handedly and perfectly arranged EVERYTHING behind the scenes so that the hapless idiot Ender could luck his way
    into beating the buggers and taking all the credit for himself.-a This is apparently what Bean, the Black, ex-street urchin wanted all along.. LOL!

    OK, I do like some things.-a I agree the "eyeball alien" is well done. Timothy Olyphant is good in his role.-a A bit of an unusual role for him
    but well done.-a I also like the actor who plays the caricature of a billionaire young tech bro... good villain, over the top yet somehow believable.

    Anyway, it's kept me watching so far.-a Mostly to curse and throw popcorn
    at the screen.-a This is some other kind of TV show wrapped in "Alien"

    Good review.
    dressing.-a And it's pretty woke, I'd think an arch-conservative like you would hate it!
    --
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    "Open the pod bay doors, HAL."

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sawfish@sawfish666@gmail.com to rec.sport.tennis on Sat Sep 20 09:17:21 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    On 9/19/25 10:56 PM, jdeluise wrote:
    jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com> writes:

    TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:

    jdeluise kirjoitti 19.9.2025 klo 1.13:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 9/18/25 8:38 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 9/17/25 9:45 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/taylor-townsend-apologizes- >>>>>>>> videos-
    calling-101607522.html
    The comments weren't worth an apology, imo.

    I agree and the comment following the apology, from "James
    Hansen,
    senior tennis editor" show that he's a woke pussy.
    True, but not as woke as the people offended by Jimmy Kimmel's
    comments.

    The whole thing, 2nd Trump, is becoming very scary.

    But, you know, we'll just have to lump thru it as best we can...

    ...if we can.
    The only thing I can do is cancel Hulu.-a But that's OK, I'm
    personally offended by this travesty of a show "Alien: Earth" ;)

    I've so far liked Alien Earth, feeling it has some potential. The
    alien eye is definitely neat character.
    Then again there are only 2 episodes left which I haven't seen
    (haven't watched EP 7 yet, but I think I'll watch it now) and the
    potential is still waiting to be capitalized.
    To be continued...

    ---SPOILER ALERT---

    The atmosphere and nostalgia from the original movie are there. And
    yes, it does try to look cool and all, but come on... 70s style CRT
    displays, flashing lights, and buckling spring keyboards coexisting in
    a world with interstellar travel and the technology to download
    children's brains into superhuman "hybrids" (which never existed in
    any of the movies)?-a Obviously when the movie was released this makes
    sense, now it just looks like a gimmick.

    And these "hybrids"...come on, Wendy is like 10 years old mentally but
    fearlessly tears a Xenomorph limb from limb on her first encounter
    with one.-a She can understand and "talk" to them in their own
    "language" and can apparently sic them on her foes? This "Wendy"
    single-handedly destroyed the mythos of the Xenomorph as the "perfect
    organism" and ruthless killing machine.-a Why would the writers do
    that?-a For girl power?-a Is she Buffy the Vampire Slayer or something?
    On that note, it does feel more like a superhero series than "Alien".

    The story is also full of glaring plot holes.-a In an early episode,
    they made a point to show that Prodigy is monitoring all of the
    hybrids' vision.-a Yet in later episodes this fact is conveniently
    ignored... hell, one of them is busy scheming with the enemy and
    arranging for humans to get the facehugger treatment.-a Nobody
    heard/saw?!

    I just can't forgive the writers for seeming to go out of their way to
    make the xenomorph seems weak and powerless most of the time, except
    when Wendy is ordering it around.-a THEN it can wipe out an entire
    squad of highly trained soldiers with assault rifles in 15 seconds
    flat.

    It reminds me a bit of what Orson Scott Card did to Ender (from the
    "Ender's Game" series) in the later "Bean" series.-a He retconned Bean
    into a supergenius who single-handedly and perfectly arranged
    EVERYTHING behind the scenes so that the hapless idiot Ender could
    luck his way into beating the buggers and taking all the credit for
    himself.-a This is apparently what Bean, the Black, ex-street urchin
    wanted all along.. LOL!

    OK, I do like some things.-a I agree the "eyeball alien" is well done.
    Timothy Olyphant is good in his role.-a A bit of an unusual role for
    him but well done.-a I also like the actor who plays the caricature of
    a billionaire young tech bro... good villain, over the top yet somehow
    believable.

    Anyway, it's kept me watching so far.-a Mostly to curse and throw
    popcorn at the screen.-a This is some other kind of TV show wrapped in
    "Alien" dressing.-a And it's pretty woke, I'd think an
    arch-conservative like you would hate it!

    I will add this, in some ways it was better than I expected.-a It's extremely well made technically.... the special effects, the atmosphere,
    the sets are great.-a Overall the acting is pretty good too, especially
    for a tv series.-a Too bad the writing is total crap (in my opinion).
    But I only really liked Alien and Aliens, the rest were utter shite.

    I'd even limit it simply to Alien.

    Ridley Scott shows what a big technical budget and an interior
    designer's eye can accomplish. I do not believe that he can recognize a
    good script. He also can usually afford competent screen actors.

    I think that Alien was where, by good fortune, he got a solid and tense script, interesting characters and first rate visual composition (his strength). Blade Runner, when you really watch it enough, is not nearly
    as good, relying on a tantalizingly close semi-distopia. When it came
    out I was living in San Pedro, the LA harbor. At night you could look NE
    and see almost exactly the opening sequence of Blade Runner. Damn, in a
    lot of ways, the milieu in the film seemed perilously close...

    I also think that there's a tone of radical post-modernism in the film.
    When the replicants seek out Tyrell, hisownself, to see if they can
    avoid death. It's actually mankind confronting God about the
    arbitrariness of mortality, and when he denies them more life, they kill
    Him, a la Nietzsche. No hope, no future--20th C man in a nutshell.

    Not much else any good. I liked some (Kingdom of Heaven) for no good
    reason, and I honestly think that The Last Duel is a really solid
    film--like it a lot.

    -a So
    my expectations were really low for this.
    --
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    "Open the pod bay doors, HAL."

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sawfish@sawfish666@gmail.com to rec.sport.tennis on Sat Sep 20 09:19:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    On 9/20/25 12:01 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com> writes:


    I just can't forgive the writers for seeming to go out of their way to
    make the xenomorph seems weak and powerless most of the time, except
    when Wendy is ordering it around.-a THEN it can wipe out an entire
    squad of highly trained soldiers with assault rifles in 15 seconds
    flat.

    It reminds me a bit of what Orson Scott Card did to Ender (from the
    "Ender's Game" series) in the later "Bean" series.-a He retconned Bean
    into a supergenius who single-handedly and perfectly arranged
    EVERYTHING behind the scenes so that the hapless idiot Ender could
    luck his way into beating the buggers and taking all the credit for
    himself.-a This is apparently what Bean, the Black, ex-street urchin
    wanted all along.. LOL!

    And it's the same thing in this new "Superman"....-a Superman's fighting with a godzilla sized fire-breathing monster stomping through town above throngs of people, and Superman says to some teenage metahuman fighting alongside him, "Oh gosh (no shit!), I'm trying to figure out how I can
    get him out of here without killing him.-a you know, maybe so we could
    study him".-a WTF!?-a Ultimately they kill him off while Superman's
    standing around thinking. Superman's only purpose was to push people out
    of the way and gently set down the monster before he falls on the crowd!?

    AI says it was done intentionally, to show a vulnerable, relatable
    Superman who's willing to show his emotional side to connect with the audience.-a And to address the perception that he's depicted as
    overpowered and boring most of the time.-a I guess the answer was to make him a prudish and indecisive karen?

    A good dose of late-phase Road Warrior films ought to balance it out
    nicely...
    --
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    "Open the pod bay doors, HAL."

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From TT@TT@dprk.kp to rec.sport.tennis on Fri Sep 26 20:52:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    jdeluise kirjoitti 20.9.2025 klo 10.01:
    jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com> writes:


    I just can't forgive the writers for seeming to go out of their way to
    make the xenomorph seems weak and powerless most of the time, except
    when Wendy is ordering it around.-a THEN it can wipe out an entire
    squad of highly trained soldiers with assault rifles in 15 seconds
    flat.

    It reminds me a bit of what Orson Scott Card did to Ender (from the
    "Ender's Game" series) in the later "Bean" series.-a He retconned Bean
    into a supergenius who single-handedly and perfectly arranged
    EVERYTHING behind the scenes so that the hapless idiot Ender could
    luck his way into beating the buggers and taking all the credit for
    himself.-a This is apparently what Bean, the Black, ex-street urchin
    wanted all along.. LOL!

    And it's the same thing in this new "Superman"....-a Superman's fighting with a godzilla sized fire-breathing monster stomping through town above throngs of people, and Superman says to some teenage metahuman fighting alongside him, "Oh gosh (no shit!), I'm trying to figure out how I can
    get him out of here without killing him.-a you know, maybe so we could
    study him".-a WTF!?-a Ultimately they kill him off while Superman's
    standing around thinking. Superman's only purpose was to push people out
    of the way and gently set down the monster before he falls on the crowd!?

    AI says it was done intentionally, to show a vulnerable, relatable
    Superman who's willing to show his emotional side to connect with the audience.-a And to address the perception that he's depicted as
    overpowered and boring most of the time.-a I guess the answer was to make him a prudish and indecisive karen?

    Haven't watched the latest Superman... perhaps one shouldn't?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From TT@TT@dprk.kp to rec.sport.tennis on Fri Sep 26 21:13:00 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    jdeluise kirjoitti 20.9.2025 klo 8.56:
    jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com> writes:

    TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:

    jdeluise kirjoitti 19.9.2025 klo 1.13:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 9/18/25 8:38 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 9/17/25 9:45 AM, jdeluise wrote:
    https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/taylor-townsend-apologizes- >>>>>>>> videos-
    calling-101607522.html
    The comments weren't worth an apology, imo.

    I agree and the comment following the apology, from "James
    Hansen,
    senior tennis editor" show that he's a woke pussy.
    True, but not as woke as the people offended by Jimmy Kimmel's
    comments.

    The whole thing, 2nd Trump, is becoming very scary.

    But, you know, we'll just have to lump thru it as best we can...

    ...if we can.
    The only thing I can do is cancel Hulu.-a But that's OK, I'm
    personally offended by this travesty of a show "Alien: Earth" ;)

    I've so far liked Alien Earth, feeling it has some potential. The
    alien eye is definitely neat character.
    Then again there are only 2 episodes left which I haven't seen
    (haven't watched EP 7 yet, but I think I'll watch it now) and the
    potential is still waiting to be capitalized.
    To be continued...

    ---SPOILER ALERT---

    The atmosphere and nostalgia from the original movie are there. And
    yes, it does try to look cool and all, but come on... 70s style CRT
    displays, flashing lights, and buckling spring keyboards coexisting in
    a world with interstellar travel and the technology to download
    children's brains into superhuman "hybrids" (which never existed in
    any of the movies)?-a Obviously when the movie was released this makes
    sense, now it just looks like a gimmick.

    And these "hybrids"...come on, Wendy is like 10 years old mentally but
    fearlessly tears a Xenomorph limb from limb on her first encounter
    with one.-a She can understand and "talk" to them in their own
    "language" and can apparently sic them on her foes? This "Wendy"
    single-handedly destroyed the mythos of the Xenomorph as the "perfect
    organism" and ruthless killing machine.-a Why would the writers do
    that?-a For girl power?-a Is she Buffy the Vampire Slayer or something?
    On that note, it does feel more like a superhero series than "Alien".

    The story is also full of glaring plot holes.-a In an early episode,
    they made a point to show that Prodigy is monitoring all of the
    hybrids' vision.-a Yet in later episodes this fact is conveniently
    ignored... hell, one of them is busy scheming with the enemy and
    arranging for humans to get the facehugger treatment.-a Nobody
    heard/saw?!

    I just can't forgive the writers for seeming to go out of their way to
    make the xenomorph seems weak and powerless most of the time, except
    when Wendy is ordering it around.-a THEN it can wipe out an entire
    squad of highly trained soldiers with assault rifles in 15 seconds
    flat.

    It reminds me a bit of what Orson Scott Card did to Ender (from the
    "Ender's Game" series) in the later "Bean" series.-a He retconned Bean
    into a supergenius who single-handedly and perfectly arranged
    EVERYTHING behind the scenes so that the hapless idiot Ender could
    luck his way into beating the buggers and taking all the credit for
    himself.-a This is apparently what Bean, the Black, ex-street urchin
    wanted all along.. LOL!

    OK, I do like some things.-a I agree the "eyeball alien" is well done.
    Timothy Olyphant is good in his role.-a A bit of an unusual role for
    him but well done.-a I also like the actor who plays the caricature of
    a billionaire young tech bro... good villain, over the top yet somehow
    believable.

    Anyway, it's kept me watching so far.-a Mostly to curse and throw
    popcorn at the screen.-a This is some other kind of TV show wrapped in
    "Alien" dressing.-a And it's pretty woke, I'd think an
    arch-conservative like you would hate it!

    I will add this, in some ways it was better than I expected.-a It's extremely well made technically.... the special effects, the atmosphere,
    the sets are great.-a Overall the acting is pretty good too, especially
    for a tv series.-a Too bad the writing is total crap (in my opinion).
    But I only really liked Alien and Aliens, the rest were utter shite.-a So
    my expectations were really low for this.

    Yes, the atmosphere etc was pretty good. But at the same time a bit inconsistent style... multiple directors?

    Just finished watching the ep 8, the last episode of season 1.
    Oh well... not sure what to think about it, the story was all over the place... apparently season 1 being pretty much an introduction &
    prologue to season 2. I think it was a mess which didn't know where it
    wanted to go. Will probably watch season 2, if it ever comes... but not waiting with bated breath, that's for sure.

    Yes, I was thinking quite a few times how unnecessary woke the casting
    choices were.

    The hybrids idea was a big miss, imo. Yes, that's exactly what Alien
    fans want to see, children inside multicultural & multisex robots.

    I guess next season starts with Weyland? Yutani attacking the island
    complex, "kids" & bunch of different aliens running around. Can't wait!
    Oh dear. What a bunch of horseshit it was. Yet I did watch it.

    P.S. I was thinking... Weyland-Yutani name probably has the Japanese
    name because Japan & Nikkei index were the future at the time.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jdeluise@jdeluise@gmail.com to rec.sport.tennis on Fri Sep 26 12:07:30 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:


    Haven't watched the latest Superman... perhaps one shouldn't?

    It was a tale of a powerless, down-trodden illegal alien being
    stomped on by "the man" and deported to a hell dimension.
    Actually, he self-deported. Sound like current events? I read it
    was intentional.

    I doubt you'd like it. I didn't, but I'm not a fan of Superman.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From TT@TT@dprk.kp to rec.sport.tennis on Fri Sep 26 23:46:00 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    jdeluise kirjoitti 26.9.2025 klo 23.07:
    TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:


    Haven't watched the latest Superman... perhaps one shouldn't?

    It was a tale of a powerless, down-trodden illegal alien being stomped
    on by "the man" and deported to a hell dimension. Actually, he self- deported.-a Sound like current events?-a I read it was intentional.

    I doubt you'd like it.-a I didn't, but I'm not a fan of Superman.

    Illegal aliens deported? Where do I sign up?!
    Sounds also like "white man bad" theme at play. Well, it's Hollywood.

    I liked 1978 superman & the sequel with Krypton supervillains was fun
    too. After that not so much. Was a big fan as a kid for the comic books, well... just about all comic books... Superman, fantastic four,
    spiderman, phantom, tex willer, Hopeanuoli ((Zilverpijl, apparently
    wasn't published in USA)... and every comic book I was able to get my
    hands on as a kid. I must say that I have probably read pretty much
    every conic book published in finland in the 70s to mid 80s. Visited frequently local used comic book store.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2