| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 27 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 41:11:03 |
| Calls: | 631 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 1,187 |
| D/L today: |
24 files (29,813K bytes) |
| Messages: | 174,724 |
1. Death penalty is wrong.
2. He's young and effectively brainwashed.
Explanation. Yes he did it but he grew up in a society (he's 22 so he was 12 in 2015) which for over 10 years labels Trump as fascist. And his followers.
And you're supposed to kill fascists, it's what you must do. All those D-day movies and so on.
You have 300 million people, not just one, but a lot more, are drawing logical conclusions from your political arena.
Call Trump and his fans fascist million times, and out of millions of people, one will do something like this.
I've been reading the early stuff available about this guy, and he has a similar trait that the guy who shot at Trump did, in that people who knew him said that he expressed very little of his political views.Coincidence? I think not!!! There's a major conspiracy afoot, without doubt!
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
I've been reading the early stuff available about this guy, and he has a similar trait that the guy who shot at Trump did, in that people who knew him said that he expressed very little of his political views.Coincidence? I think not!!! There's a major conspiracy afoot, without doubt!
Yes that's strange. I assumed he was a leftist, but apparently not.
I guess if there's no conspiracy I would say main motive for both was chaos or fame?
But for sure, I believe in any conspiracy you give me.
On 9/12/25 11:47 AM, *skriptis wrote:
1. Death penalty is wrong.
2. He's young and effectively brainwashed.
Explanation. Yes he did it but he grew up in a society (he's 22
so
he was 12 in 2015) which for over 10 years labels Trump as
fascist. And his followers.
And you're supposed to kill fascists, it's what you must
do. All
those D-day movies and so on.
You have 300 million people, not just one, but a lot more, are
drawing logical conclusions from your political arena.
Call Trump and his fans fascist million times, and out of
millions
of people, one will do something like this.
I've been reading the early stuff available about this guy, and
he has
a similar trait that the guy who shot at Trump did, in that
people who
knew him said that he expressed very little of his political
views.
Coincidence? I think not!!! There's a major conspiracy afoot,
without doubt!
On 9/12/25 11:54 AM, *skriptis wrote:
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
I've been reading the early stuff available about this guy,Yes that's strange. I assumed he was a leftist, but apparently
and he has a similar trait that the guy who shot at Trump did,
in that people who knew him said that he expressed very little
of his political views.Coincidence? I think not!!! There's a
major conspiracy afoot, without doubt!
not.
I guess if there's no conspiracy I would say main motive for
both
was chaos or fame?
But for sure, I believe in any conspiracy you give me.
I want to expand on this a bit...
This guy, I'm ambivalent about his ultimate legal fate, but the
front
man who was fired yesterday for his X post on the killing should
be
shot for using "yall". There's no question about it.
And the *nature* of his crime is such that no trial is
needed--save
the public expense--the crime being so obvious and so heinous
that the
judgement is unanimous. Death by firing squad. Poetic justice.
And I foresee that there'd be a huge popular demand for spots on
the
firing squad: people would be willing to pay large sums. I know
I
would be...
Trump is big into capitalizing on financial potential--his
obvious
reason for tariffs, no doubt--so he might offer a national
lottery for
the spots on the squad. It could be a big enough money maker
that it
could chip into this year's budget deficit.
Now, a traditional firing squad has only about 5 members. In
order to
further capitalize on the opportunity, Trump could, besides
offering
spots in a lottery, or even an online auction, expand the size
of the
firing squad. I'd recommend that he limit it to 500,
though. There's
no point in making this solemn occasion into some sort of a
crass
spectacle, is there?
Who's with me on this?
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/12/25 11:54 AM, *skriptis wrote:
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
I've been reading the early stuff available about this guy, and heYes that's strange. I assumed he was a leftist, but apparently not.
has a similar trait that the guy who shot at Trump did, in that
people who knew him said that he expressed very little of his
political views.Coincidence? I think not!!! There's a major
conspiracy afoot, without doubt!
I guess if there's no conspiracy I would say main motive for both
was chaos or fame?
But for sure, I believe in any conspiracy you give me.
I want to expand on this a bit...
This guy, I'm ambivalent about his ultimate legal fate, but the front
man who was fired yesterday for his X post on the killing should be
shot for using "yall". There's no question about it.
And the *nature* of his crime is such that no trial is needed--save
the public expense--the crime being so obvious and so heinous that the
judgement is unanimous. Death by firing squad. Poetic justice.
And I foresee that there'd be a huge popular demand for spots on the
firing squad: people would be willing to pay large sums. I know I
would be...
Trump is big into capitalizing on financial potential--his obvious
reason for tariffs, no doubt--so he might offer a national lottery for
the spots on the squad. It could be a big enough money maker that it
could chip into this year's budget deficit.
Now, a traditional firing squad has only about 5 members. In order to
further capitalize on the opportunity, Trump could, besides offering
spots in a lottery, or even an online auction, expand the size of the
firing squad. I'd recommend that he limit it to 500, though. There's
no point in making this solemn occasion into some sort of a crass
spectacle, is there?
Who's with me on this?
Personally I think you sound increasingly unhinged.-a A ripe old lion...
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
I've been reading the early stuff available about this guy, and
he has a similar trait that the guy who shot at Trump did, in
that people who knew him said that he expressed very little of
his political views.Coincidence? I think not!!! There's a major
conspiracy afoot, without doubt!
Yes that's strange. I assumed he was a leftist, but apparently
not.
I guess if there's no conspiracy I would say main motive for
both was chaos or fame?
But for sure, I believe in any conspiracy you give me.
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/12/25 11:47 AM, *skriptis wrote:
1. Death penalty is wrong.
2. He's young and effectively brainwashed.
Explanation. Yes he did it but he grew up in a society (he's 22 so
he was 12 in 2015) which for over 10 years labels Trump as
fascist. And his followers.
And you're supposed to kill fascists, it's what you must do. All
those D-day movies and so on.
You have 300 million people, not just one, but a lot more, are
drawing logical conclusions from your political arena.
Call Trump and his fans fascist million times, and out of millions
of people, one will do something like this.
I've been reading the early stuff available about this guy, and he has
a similar trait that the guy who shot at Trump did, in that people who
knew him said that he expressed very little of his political views.
Coincidence? I think not!!! There's a major conspiracy afoot, without
doubt!
I saw pictures of him in a Trump shirt though...
... the front man who was fired yesterday for his X post on the killing should be shot for using "yall". There's no question about it.
On 9/12/25 11:54 AM, *skriptis wrote:
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
I've been reading the early stuff available about this guy, and he
has a similar trait that the guy who shot at Trump did, in that
people who knew him said that he expressed very little of his
political views.Coincidence? I think not!!! There's a major
conspiracy afoot, without doubt!
Yes that's strange. I assumed he was a leftist, but apparently not.
I guess if there's no conspiracy I would say main motive for both was
chaos or fame?
But for sure, I believe in any conspiracy you give me.
I want to expand on this a bit...
This guy, I'm ambivalent about his ultimate legal fate, but the front
man who was fired yesterday for his X post on the killing should be shot
for using "yall". There's no question about it.
And the *nature* of his crime is such that no trial is needed--save the public expense--the crime being so obvious and so heinous that the
judgement is unanimous. Death by firing squad. Poetic justice.
And I foresee that there'd be a huge popular demand for spots on the
firing squad: people would be willing to pay large sums. I know I would be...
Trump is big into capitalizing on financial potential--his obvious
reason for tariffs, no doubt--so he might offer a national lottery for
the spots on the squad. It could be a big enough money maker that it
could chip into this year's budget deficit.
Now, a traditional firing squad has only about 5 members. In order to further capitalize on the opportunity, Trump could, besides offering
spots in a lottery, or even an online auction, expand the size of the
firing squad. I'd recommend that he limit it to 500, though. There's no point in making this solemn occasion into some sort of a crass
spectacle, is there?
Who's with me on this?
On 9/12/25 12:18 PM, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/12/25 11:47 AM, *skriptis wrote:I saw pictures of him in a Trump shirt though...
1. Death penalty is wrong.
2. He's young and effectively brainwashed.
Explanation. Yes he did it but he grew up in a society (he's
22 so
he was 12 in 2015) which for over 10 years labels Trump as
fascist. And his followers.
And you're supposed to kill fascists, it's what you must
do. All
those D-day movies and so on.
You have 300 million people, not just one, but a lot more,
are
drawing logical conclusions from your political arena.
Call Trump and his fans fascist million times, and out of
millions
of people, one will do something like this.
I've been reading the early stuff available about this guy,
and he has
a similar trait that the guy who shot at Trump did, in that
people who
knew him said that he expressed very little of his political
views.
Coincidence? I think not!!! There's a major conspiracy afoot,
without doubt!
He was confused and thought that Kirk was a Trump *opponent*?
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
... the front man who was fired yesterday for his X post on the killing should be shot for using "yall". There's no question about it.
https://youtu.be/tTv5ckMe_2M?feature=shared
1. Death penalty is wrong.
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/12/25 12:18 PM, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/12/25 11:47 AM, *skriptis wrote:I saw pictures of him in a Trump shirt though...
1. Death penalty is wrong.
2. He's young and effectively brainwashed.
Explanation. Yes he did it but he grew up in a society (he's 22 so
he was 12 in 2015) which for over 10 years labels Trump as
fascist. And his followers.
And you're supposed to kill fascists, it's what you must do. All
those D-day movies and so on.
You have 300 million people, not just one, but a lot more, are
drawing logical conclusions from your political arena.
Call Trump and his fans fascist million times, and out of millions
of people, one will do something like this.
I've been reading the early stuff available about this guy, and he has >>>> a similar trait that the guy who shot at Trump did, in that people who >>>> knew him said that he expressed very little of his political views.
Coincidence? I think not!!! There's a major conspiracy afoot,
without doubt!
He was confused and thought that Kirk was a Trump *opponent*?
It's not a stretch to consider he may have been trying to turn Kirk into
a martyr.-a Or maybe even create a George Floyd moment for the right. Someone who *wants* an authoritarian crackdown (like you) might not want
to wait, after all Trump is looking very shaky health-wise.-a So, he
struck while the iron's hot?
On 9/12/2025 2:49 PM, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/12/25 12:18 PM, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/12/25 11:47 AM, *skriptis wrote:I saw pictures of him in a Trump shirt though...
1. Death penalty is wrong.
2. He's young and effectively brainwashed.
Explanation. Yes he did it but he grew up in a society (he's 22 so >>>>>> he was 12 in 2015) which for over 10 years labels Trump as
fascist. And his followers.
And you're supposed to kill fascists, it's what you must do. All
those D-day movies and so on.
You have 300 million people, not just one, but a lot more, are
drawing logical conclusions from your political arena.
Call Trump and his fans fascist million times, and out of millions >>>>>> of people, one will do something like this.
I've been reading the early stuff available about this guy, and he has >>>>> a similar trait that the guy who shot at Trump did, in that people who >>>>> knew him said that he expressed very little of his political views.
Coincidence? I think not!!! There's a major conspiracy afoot,
without doubt!
He was confused and thought that Kirk was a Trump *opponent*?
It's not a stretch to consider he may have been trying to turn Kirk
into a martyr.-a Or maybe even create a George Floyd moment for the
right. Someone who *wants* an authoritarian crackdown (like you) might
not want to wait, after all Trump is looking very shaky health-wise.
So, he struck while the iron's hot?
JD, please give me your honest health assessment of Trump 2025 vs. Biden 2020. Seriously. Especially after what Harris supposedly will be saying
in her book that has or will be soon released. Thanks in advance.
On 9/12/25 5:00 PM, Scall5 wrote:
On 9/12/2025 2:49 PM, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/12/25 12:18 PM, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/12/25 11:47 AM, *skriptis wrote:I saw pictures of him in a Trump shirt though...
1. Death penalty is wrong.
2. He's young and effectively brainwashed.
Explanation. Yes he did it but he grew up in a society (he's 22 so >>>>>>> he was 12 in 2015) which for over 10 years labels Trump as
fascist. And his followers.
And you're supposed to kill fascists, it's what you must do. All >>>>>>> those D-day movies and so on.
You have 300 million people, not just one, but a lot more, are
drawing logical conclusions from your political arena.
Call Trump and his fans fascist million times, and out of millions >>>>>>> of people, one will do something like this.
I've been reading the early stuff available about this guy, and he >>>>>> has
a similar trait that the guy who shot at Trump did, in that people >>>>>> who
knew him said that he expressed very little of his political views. >>>>>>
Coincidence? I think not!!! There's a major conspiracy afoot,
without doubt!
He was confused and thought that Kirk was a Trump *opponent*?
It's not a stretch to consider he may have been trying to turn Kirk
into a martyr.-a Or maybe even create a George Floyd moment for the
right. Someone who *wants* an authoritarian crackdown (like you)
might not want to wait, after all Trump is looking very shaky health-
wise. So, he struck while the iron's hot?
JD, please give me your honest health assessment of Trump 2025 vs.
Biden 2020. Seriously. Especially after what Harris supposedly will be
saying in her book that has or will be soon released. Thanks in advance.
I'll butt in-a here...
Biden was obviously mentally impaired even during the 2020 campaign, but
it was easier to accept that he was just being like he had always been, prone to verbal gaffes; endearingly like Samuel Goldwyn, who is supposed
to have uttered aphorisms like "include me out". I certainly accepted
this and paid little attention to it until the 2024 debate and his subsequent pathetic "remedial" TV interview,
Then the dam broke, and in retrospect it looked bad, real bad.
To me, Trump, within one year of my age, looked pretty good for most of
the 2024 campaign, but looks *physically* pretty bad since he's been in office--increasingly so. He's mentally about the same--he's a populist provocateur, basically reactive to what's said rather than initiating a
new thought.
I look at him and think he may not live out his term, which I never
would have said during his first term, or even during the 2024 campaign.
I, myself, expect to live out *his* term, so there...
But who knows?
On 9/12/25 5:00 PM, Scall5 wrote:
On 9/12/2025 2:49 PM, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:JD, please give me your honest health assessment of Trump 2025
On 9/12/25 12:18 PM, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/12/25 11:47 AM, *skriptis wrote:I saw pictures of him in a Trump shirt though...
1. Death penalty is wrong.
2. He's young and effectively brainwashed.
Explanation. Yes he did it but he grew up in a society
(he's 22 so
he was 12 in 2015) which for over 10 years labels Trump as
fascist. And his followers.
And you're supposed to kill fascists, it's what you must
do. All
those D-day movies and so on.
You have 300 million people, not just one, but a lot more,
are
drawing logical conclusions from your political arena.
Call Trump and his fans fascist million times, and out of
millions
of people, one will do something like this.
I've been reading the early stuff available about this guy,
and he has
a similar trait that the guy who shot at Trump did, in that
people who
knew him said that he expressed very little of his
political views.
Coincidence? I think not!!! There's a major conspiracy
afoot,
without doubt!
He was confused and thought that Kirk was a Trump *opponent*?
It's not a stretch to consider he may have been trying to turn
Kirk
into a martyr.-a Or maybe even create a George Floyd moment for
the
right. Someone who *wants* an authoritarian crackdown (like
you)
might not want to wait, after all Trump is looking very shaky
health-wise. So, he struck while the iron's hot?
vs. Biden 2020. Seriously. Especially after what Harris
supposedly
will be saying in her book that has or will be soon
released. Thanks
in advance.
I'll butt in here...
Biden was obviously mentally impaired even during the 2020
campaign,
but it was easier to accept that he was just being like he had
always
been, prone to verbal gaffes; endearingly like Samuel Goldwyn,
who is
supposed to have uttered aphorisms like "include me out". I
certainly
accepted this and paid little attention to it until the 2024
debate
and his subsequent pathetic "remedial" TV interview,
Then the dam broke, and in retrospect it looked bad, real bad.
To me, Trump, within one year of my age, looked pretty good for
most
of the 2024 campaign, but looks *physically* pretty bad since
he's
been in office--increasingly so. He's mentally about the
same--he's a
populist provocateur, basically reactive to what's said rather
than
initiating a new thought.
I look at him and think he may not live out his term, which I
never
would have said during his first term, or even during the 2024
campaign. I, myself, expect to live out *his* term, so there...
But who knows?
On 9/12/2025 1:47 PM, *skriptis wrote:> > > 1. Death penalty is wrong.I disagree 100% with this. I
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/12/25 5:00 PM, Scall5 wrote:
On 9/12/2025 2:49 PM, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:JD, please give me your honest health assessment of Trump 2025
On 9/12/25 12:18 PM, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/12/25 11:47 AM, *skriptis wrote:I saw pictures of him in a Trump shirt though...
1. Death penalty is wrong.
2. He's young and effectively brainwashed.
Explanation. Yes he did it but he grew up in a society (he's 22 so >>>>>>>> he was 12 in 2015) which for over 10 years labels Trump as
fascist. And his followers.
And you're supposed to kill fascists, it's what you must do. All >>>>>>>> those D-day movies and so on.
You have 300 million people, not just one, but a lot more, are >>>>>>>> drawing logical conclusions from your political arena.
Call Trump and his fans fascist million times, and out of millions >>>>>>>> of people, one will do something like this.
I've been reading the early stuff available about this guy, and >>>>>>> he has
a similar trait that the guy who shot at Trump did, in that
people who
knew him said that he expressed very little of his political views. >>>>>>>
Coincidence? I think not!!! There's a major conspiracy afoot,
without doubt!
He was confused and thought that Kirk was a Trump *opponent*?
It's not a stretch to consider he may have been trying to turn Kirk
into a martyr.-a Or maybe even create a George Floyd moment for the
right. Someone who *wants* an authoritarian crackdown (like you)
might not want to wait, after all Trump is looking very shaky
health-wise.-a So, he struck while the iron's hot?
vs. Biden 2020. Seriously. Especially after what Harris supposedly
will be saying in her book that has or will be soon released. Thanks
in advance.
I'll butt in-a here...
Biden was obviously mentally impaired even during the 2020 campaign,
but it was easier to accept that he was just being like he had always
been, prone to verbal gaffes; endearingly like Samuel Goldwyn, who is
supposed to have uttered aphorisms like "include me out". I certainly
accepted this and paid little attention to it until the 2024 debate
and his subsequent pathetic "remedial" TV interview,
Then the dam broke, and in retrospect it looked bad, real bad.
To me, Trump, within one year of my age, looked pretty good for most
of the 2024 campaign, but looks *physically* pretty bad since he's
been in office--increasingly so. He's mentally about the same--he's a
populist provocateur, basically reactive to what's said rather than
initiating a new thought.
I look at him and think he may not live out his term, which I never
would have said during his first term, or even during the 2024
campaign. I, myself, expect to live out *his* term, so there...
But who knows?
People often forget about Biden's final SOTU address.-a He spoke well despite his stutter, and he was replying to his republican hecklers with
ad hoc zingers.-a The GOP was so scared they spread a myth he was on
PEDs, remember that?
Reality was he had good days and bad days from the very beginning. I
thought he had terrible days during the 2020 campaign!-a Pretty good president overall, I'd say.-a A lot better than Obama.
Oh well, with Trump's ill-gotten gains to the power of the presidency Sanders-AOC will really be able to clean things up next term-a ;)--
On 9/12/2025 1:47 PM, *skriptis wrote:> > > 1. Death penalty is wrong.I disagree 100% with this. I HONESTLY want to see hangings in public for those who deserve it. Happened to the Nazis after WWII. Capital punishment has happened so many times in history; still does in many nations. It's a great crime determent and protects law abiding citizens who maintain and help society.Amazing how a 16 year old can complete classes/training/driving lessons to drive a car; yet doesn't know that robbing, raping, or killing someone is illegal? Kill them and be done with it.Make my words, people would adjust real quick....-- ---------------Scall5
On 9/12/2025 1:47 PM, *skriptis wrote:
1. Death penalty is wrong.
I disagree 100% with this. I HONESTLY want to see hangings in
public
for those who deserve it. Happened to the Nazis after
WWII. Capital
punishment has happened so many times in history; still does in
many
nations. It's a great crime determent and protects law abiding
citizens who maintain and help society.
Amazing how a 16 year old can complete classes/training/driving
lessons to drive a car; yet doesn't know that robbing, raping,
or
killing someone is illegal? Kill them and be done with it.
Make my words, people would adjust real quick....
On 9/12/2025 1:47 PM, *skriptis wrote:
1. Death penalty is wrong.
I disagree 100% with this. I HONESTLY want to see hangings in public
those who deserve it. Happened to the Nazis after WWII. Capital
punishment has happened so many times in history; still does in many nations. It's a great crime determent and protects law abiding citizens
who maintain and help society.
Amazing how a 16 year old can complete classes/training/driving lessons
to drive a car; yet doesn't know that robbing, raping, or killing
someone is illegal? Kill them and be done with it.
On 13.9.2025 2.55, Scall5 wrote:
On 9/12/2025 1:47 PM, *skriptis wrote:
1. Death penalty is wrong.
I disagree 100% with this. I HONESTLY want to see hangings in public
To each their own.
for
those who deserve it. Happened to the Nazis after WWII. Capital
punishment has happened so many times in history; still does in many
nations. It's a great crime determent and protects law abiding
citizens who maintain and help society.
Google AI answers the question "is crime lower in states that have
capital punishment":
"No, states with capital punishment do not have lower crime rates; in
fact, statistics consistently show that murder rates are higher in
states with the death penalty compared to those without it. Decades of research, including analyses of FBI data and studies on the death
penalty's effects, demonstrate that capital punishment is not a unique deterrent to crime and does not enhance public safety. "
Studies in general claim that
1. The certainty of being caught is a vastly more
powerful deterrent than the punishment.
2. Increasing the severity of punishment does little
to deter crime.
3. Sending an offender to prison isnrCOt a very
effective way to deter crime:
"Prisons are good for punishing criminals and keeping them off the
street, but prison sentences are unlikely to deter future crime. Prisons actually may have the opposite effect:-a Inmates learn more effective
crime strategies from each other, and time spent in prison may
desensitize many to the threat of future imprisonment."
...So if we believe this horseshit... I guess appropriate punishment for crime would be a gentle scolding?
On 13/09/2025 8:32 pm, TT wrote:
Studies in general claim that
1. The certainty of being caught is a vastly more
powerful deterrent than the punishment.
2. Increasing the severity of punishment does little
to deter crime.
3. Sending an offender to prison isnrCOt a very
effective way to deter crime:
"Prisons are good for punishing criminals and keeping them off the
street, but prison sentences are unlikely to deter future crime. Prisons
actually may have the opposite effect:-a Inmates learn more effective
crime strategies from each other, and time spent in prison may
desensitize many to the threat of future imprisonment."
...So if we believe this horseshit... I guess appropriate punishment
for crime would be a gentle scolding?
It clearly is horseshit.-a Of course the death penalty will deter that criminal from ever re-offending again.-a It's 100% foolproof. I can prove it.
On 13/09/2025 8:32 pm, TT wrote:
Studies in general claim that
1. The certainty of being caught is a vastly more
powerful deterrent than the punishment.
2. Increasing the severity of punishment does little
to deter crime.
3. Sending an offender to prison isnrCOt a very
effective way to deter crime:
"Prisons are good for punishing criminals and keeping them off the
street, but prison sentences are unlikely to deter future crime. Prisons
actually may have the opposite effect:-a Inmates learn more effective
crime strategies from each other, and time spent in prison may
desensitize many to the threat of future imprisonment."
...So if we believe this horseshit... I guess appropriate punishment
for crime would be a gentle scolding?
It clearly is horseshit.-a Of course the death penalty will deter that criminal from ever re-offending again.-a It's 100% foolproof. I can prove it.-a I can list all the crims who have been executed and 100% of them
have never offended again.-a The punishment is perfect, but needs to be streamlined.-a It's ridiculous to have them on death row for years,
should be 3 months max.
There are too many people on this planet so rehabilitation is not a necessary factor, plenty more to take their place.
On 13/09/2025 8:32 pm, TT wrote:
Studies in general claim that
1. The certainty of being caught is a vastly more
powerful deterrent than the punishment.
2. Increasing the severity of punishment does little
to deter crime.
3. Sending an offender to prison isnrCOt a very
effective way to deter crime:
"Prisons are good for punishing criminals and keeping them off the
street, but prison sentences are unlikely to deter future crime. Prisons
actually may have the opposite effect:-a Inmates learn more effective
crime strategies from each other, and time spent in prison may
desensitize many to the threat of future imprisonment."
...So if we believe this horseshit... I guess appropriate punishment
for crime would be a gentle scolding?
It clearly is horseshit.-a Of course the death penalty will deter that criminal from ever re-offending again.-a It's 100% foolproof. I can prove it.-a I can list all the crims who have been executed and 100% of them
have never offended again.-a The punishment is perfect, but needs to be streamlined.-a It's ridiculous to have them on death row for years,
should be 3 months max.
There are too many people on this planet so rehabilitation is not a necessary factor, plenty more to take their place.
People often forget about Biden's final SOTU address.-a He spoke well despite his stutter
jdeluise kirjoitti 13.9.2025 klo 6.01:
People often forget about Biden's final SOTU address.-a He spoke
well
despite his stutter
Yeah, the man was totally fit to be the vegetab... excuse
me... *commander* in chief.
TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:
jdeluise kirjoitti 13.9.2025 klo 6.01:
People often forget about Biden's final SOTU address.-a He spoke well
despite his stutter
Yeah, the man was totally fit to be the vegetab... excuse
me... *commander* in chief.
But on that day he was capable.
On 9/14/25 2:19 AM, jdeluise wrote:
TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:
jdeluise kirjoitti 13.9.2025 klo 6.01:But on that day he was capable.
People often forget about Biden's final SOTU address.-a He
spoke well
despite his stutter
Yeah, the man was totally fit to be the vegetab... excuse
me... *commander* in chief.
Putin would just wait for an off day before pulling something.