• The Russian past of Alaska, where Trump and Putin will meet

    From *skriptis@skriptis@post.t-com.hr to rec.sport.tennis on Tue Aug 12 14:03:29 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    ------=_Part_0_6887375.1755000209371
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250811-the-russian-past-of-alaska-where-trump-and-putin-will-meet
    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html ------=_Part_0_6887375.1755000209371--
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lane the Caustic@wichitajayhawks@msn.com to rec.sport.tennis on Tue Aug 12 07:22:26 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    *skriptis wrote:
    https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250811-the-russian-past-of-alaska-where-trump-and-putin-will-meet

    Quite an interesting article. It says the Russians over exploited the
    seal and sea otter populations causing them to crash along with the
    hunting expeditions as well. Then they sold it to the Americans.
    --
    n
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From *skriptis@skriptis@post.t-com.hr to rec.sport.tennis on Tue Aug 12 15:01:16 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    ------=_Part_4_131430671.1755003676680
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    Lane the Caustic <wichitajayhawks@msn.com> Wrote in message:r
    *skriptis wrote:> https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250811-the-russian-past-of-alaska-where-trump-and-putin-will-meet> Quite an interesting article. It says the Russians over exploited the seal and sea otter populations causing them to crash along with the hunting expeditions as well. Then they sold it to the Americans.-- n



    I don't know, I wasn't there.

    But I doubt you could do that at such a vast area in late 18th and 19th century with no or little technology? And remote as well.

    I'd say the real truth is they lost profit, had to travel more or work more to achieve the same results so it collapsed.


    What I find interesting is that Russians "sold" Alaska even though they had no right to do it.

    I am not talking about them seizing it in the first place, that was a standard conquest, I'm talking about the fact they "sold" the entire territory yet they didn't even visit all of it, let alone established firm presence all over it.

    It's like USA selling the Moon to someone in 1970s...

    It's funny because as I understand some natives oppose the purchase claiming they're independent whole time, that Russia never seized them so had no right to sell them and USA bought only that which Russia controlled?

    Of course that's nitpicking, even if they weren't sold by Russia, in the end they got occupied by USA and later annexed so the end result is the same.




    The purchase is now considered a huge success for America, due to gold and oil, and even without those, land is always land. And in case of Alaska it's strategically important for airplanes and so on.

    But it benefitted Russia immensely as well, they used money to modernize, to build Trans Siberian railway, solidifying their rule over that part of Eurasia.

    Doing it 10, or 20 or 30 years later might have been too late.

    So in essence it's a symbol of Russian and American cooperation and strategic alignment.


    That's the symbolism of the meeting.
    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html ------=_Part_4_131430671.1755003676680--
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?Pelle_Svansl=C3=B6s?=@pelle@svans.los to rec.sport.tennis on Tue Aug 12 18:47:04 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    On 12.8.2025 16.01, *skriptis wrote:
    Lane the Caustic <wichitajayhawks@msn.com> Wrote in message:r
    *skriptis wrote:> https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250811-the-russian-past-of-alaska-where-trump-and-putin-will-meet> Quite an interesting article. It says the Russians over exploited the seal and sea otter populations causing them to crash along with the hunting expeditions as well. Then they sold it to the Americans.-- n



    I don't know, I wasn't there.

    But I doubt you could do that at such a vast area in late 18th and 19th century with no or little technology? And remote as well.

    I'd say the real truth is they lost profit, had to travel more or work more to achieve the same results so it collapsed.


    What I find interesting is that Russians "sold" Alaska even though they had no right to do it.

    I am not talking about them seizing it in the first place, that was a standard conquest, I'm talking about the fact they "sold" the entire territory yet they didn't even visit all of it, let alone established firm presence all over it.

    Nothing much has changed. Russia now wants all of Donesk in the peace
    talks even though they haven't visited it all.

    How the Russian mind works is a mystery.
    --
    rCLThe West as we knew it no longer existsrCY
    -- Ursula von der Leyen
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From *skriptis@skriptis@post.t-com.hr to rec.sport.tennis on Tue Aug 12 18:00:36 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    ------=_Part_0_243125751.1755014436093
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    Pelle Svansl=C3=B6s <pelle@svans.los> Wrote in message:
    Nothing much has changed. Russia now wants all of Donesk in the peace tal=
    ks even though they haven't visited it all.How the Russian mind works is a = mystery.


    It's only a mystery for those who don't respect Russia. Who think Russia sh= ould not be at the table.

    It's very similar to Djokovic case.

    Guy received no respect, he was mocked, his healthy ambition to win, procla= imed as illegitimate.

    You had to be bitch slapped with 24 slams.

    Was it such a problem to listen and respect him when he had 5?




    https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/08/biden-didnt-accept-putins-red-line-on-ukrai= ne-what-it-means.html





    --=20




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html ------=_Part_0_243125751.1755014436093--
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jdeluise@jdeluise@gmail.com to rec.sport.tennis on Tue Aug 12 21:50:30 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    *skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> writes:

    Lane the Caustic <wichitajayhawks@msn.com> Wrote in message:r
    *skriptis wrote:>
    https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250811-the-russian-past-of-alaska-where-trump-and-putin-will-meet>
    Quite an interesting article. It says the Russians over
    exploited the seal and sea otter populations causing them to
    crash along with the hunting expeditions as well. Then they
    sold it to the Americans.-- n



    I don't know, I wasn't there.

    But I doubt you could do that at such a vast area in late 18th
    and 19th century with no or little technology? And remote as
    well.

    I'd say the real truth is they lost profit, had to travel more
    or work more to achieve the same results so it collapsed.


    What I find interesting is that Russians "sold" Alaska even
    though they had no right to do it.

    I am not talking about them seizing it in the first place, that
    was a standard conquest, I'm talking about the fact they "sold"
    the entire territory yet they didn't even visit all of it, let
    alone established firm presence all over it.

    It's like USA selling the Moon to someone in 1970s...

    It's funny because as I understand some natives oppose the
    purchase claiming they're independent whole time, that Russia
    never seized them so had no right to sell them and USA bought
    only that which Russia controlled?

    Of course that's nitpicking, even if they weren't sold by
    Russia, in the end they got occupied by USA and later annexed so
    the end result is the same.




    The purchase is now considered a huge success for America, due
    to gold and oil, and even without those, land is always
    land. And in case of Alaska it's strategically important for
    airplanes and so on.

    But it benefitted Russia immensely as well, they used money to
    modernize, to build Trans Siberian railway, solidifying their
    rule over that part of Eurasia.

    Doing it 10, or 20 or 30 years later might have been too late.

    So in essence it's a symbol of Russian and American cooperation
    and strategic alignment.


    That's the symbolism of the meeting.

    I'm not sure I like the symbolism. Russia has been talking about
    reclaiming Alaska for decades, then Trump decides to meet Putin
    here. And today claims not once but twice that he's "going to
    Russia"?!

    :)
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From *skriptis@skriptis@post.t-com.hr to rec.sport.tennis on Wed Aug 13 10:35:17 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    ------=_Part_2_80852814.1755074117112
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
    I'm not sure I like the symbolism. Russia has been talking about reclaiming Alaska for decades, then Trump decides to meet Putin here. And today claims not once but twice that he's "going to Russia"?!:)



    Perhaps it's already done?

    https://tinyurl.com/54t729ae
    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html ------=_Part_2_80852814.1755074117112--
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2