• Is Nadal bit unlucky?

    From *skriptis@skriptis@post.t-com.hr to rec.sport.tennis on Fri Jul 25 11:51:59 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    ------=_Part_0_138462313.1753437119341
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


    Maybe it's the wrong word, but you get the point.

    He won 14 FO titles, yet longest streak was 5.

    4 - 5 - 4 - 1


    2005-2008,
    2010-2014,
    2017-2020,
    2022


    Of course it's absurd that he has three 4+ streaks at one slams, but there'=
    s a feeling of loss that we was unable to win 6th to get most in open era, =
    or even 8 to get all-time record (Sears winning first 7 US championships is=
    a bogus record but still).


    It's even all more so ironic knowing that it wasn't Federer or Djokovic who=
    stopped him from perhaps even winning 9 in a row during 2005-2014, but S= =C3=B6derling.

    Actually in Monte Carlo it all happend "as scripted", Nadal won 8 in a row = and lost final to a rival Djokovic while attempting to win his 9th title in=
    a row in 2013.

    But French Open was unexpected in a way.

    S=C3=B6derling winning that match is for me the greatest upset in tennis hi= story and a win that prevented some serious records from being written and = allowed some other records.

    S=C3=B6derling made it possible for Federer to win FO so we nevertheless go=
    t records, just not on Nadal's side.



    He used dirty tricks to unsettle Nadal, imitating his ass touching and perh= aps even touching his bottles in Wimbledon two years before I think so Nada=
    l was probably not very comfortable playing him. But still he did beat him =
    in Rome 60 61 or 61 60 just weeks prior.


    It's truly an amazing upset.



    https://youtu.be/mSFmM7BakV4?si=3DLxANU2iAMRzQGmlT
    --=20




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html ------=_Part_0_138462313.1753437119341--
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2