• Healthy League System

    From anders t@anthu_001@-nospam-hotmail.com to rec.sport.soccer on Sun Sep 7 09:50:28 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    Is it good or bad if in a league system the promoted teams almost always
    get relegated directly.

    Does this mean that the league system has correctly stratified the teams
    and that everything is in order, and all teams are at the correct level?

    Or is it a sign that the league system is protectionistic, giving (unfair) advantage to the upper level teams?
    --
    Manchester United FC - CHAMPIONS
    Latest: England '13 (20th) Europa '17, UEFA '08, World '08
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From MH@MHnospam@ucalgary.ca to rec.sport.soccer on Sun Sep 7 14:14:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    On 2025-09-07 00:50, anders t wrote:
    Is it good or bad if in a league system the promoted teams almost always
    get relegated directly.

    I would say bad. >
    Does this mean that the league system has correctly stratified the teams
    and that everything is in order, and all teams are at the correct level?

    That would be true if we see teams as static, but ideally teams should,
    by clever scouting and imaginative coaching and marketing, be able to
    improve their lot in life. Conversely, teams that rest on their laurels
    should get their comeuppance.>
    Or is it a sign that the league system is protectionistic, giving (unfair) advantage to the upper level teams?

    I would lean towards this interpretation, though in England, the
    parachute money is substantial, I believe.>

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From =?UTF-8?B?TGzDqW8=?=@llb.moura@gmail.com to rec.sport.soccer on Wed Oct 1 19:15:36 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

    I'm VERY late to this, but let's have a shot at this one.

    On 07/09/2025 04:50, anders t wrote:
    Is it good or bad if in a league system the promoted teams almost always
    get relegated directly.


    In principle, I'd think it's bad. That could suggest that the gap
    between divisions is a bit too wide. In such scenarios, what is the
    point of pro/rel?

    I mean, using a purposely exaggerated example to illustrate my point:
    imagine, say, in England, direct pro/rel between the Premier League and
    the National League. Would it make sense?


    Does this mean that the league system has correctly stratified the teams
    and that everything is in order, and all teams are at the correct level?

    Or is it a sign that the league system is protectionistic, giving (unfair) advantage to the upper level teams?


    In both cases, it would seem that water found its own level, whether
    naturally or artificially (ie, through protectionistic actions, as you
    put it). If that happened naturally, I don't know what could be done
    about it. If artificially, then it could be interesting to see what
    happens when you bring down the barriers.

    Your questions have led me to ponder: is this "fluidity" between
    divisions measurable, and how to do it?

    On another note, probably related, is there a way to measure how
    "diverse" a league is? "Diverse" as in, is it almost always the same old faces, or could one reasonably expect to meet newcomers time and then? I
    guess one would expect less "stratified" leagues to be somehow more diverse.

    I guess the data to look at, for the first concept, are the divisional movements. For example, on average, how many seasons does a promoted
    team survive in the upper level? How many seasons does it take for a
    relegated club to return to that division?

    For the second concept, maybe the data to look at would be the
    distribution of participations of each club in that division over a
    specified time period.

    It could be interesting to raise such data from different levels of the
    same league system, and then do the same different countries for
    comparison. And there may be other ways to look at this too. Some food
    for thought.


    Best regards,

    Ll|-o
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2