• Re: Iffy numerical what-comes-next puzzle...

    From Phil Carmody@pc+usenet@asdf.org to rec.puzzles on Tue Jul 22 22:06:42 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.puzzles

    David Entwistle <qnivq.ragjvfgyr@ogvagrearg.pbz> writes:
    On Sat, 17 May 2025 14:03:03 +0300, Phil Carmody wrote:

    What comes next in this kinda-numerical sequence:

    Sort of related to the original question...

    1, 2, 4, 8, 7, ?

    Ubcr V unir guvf evtug... Svir. Gurl ner gur qvtvgny ebbg (gur fhz bs gur qvtvgf) va gur frevrf bs ryrira envfrq gb gur cbjre mreb, bar, gjb rgp.
    Sbe gubfr jub yvxr fhpu guvatf, jul vf vg gur fnzr nf gur fhz bs gur
    qvtvgf va gur frevrf bs gjb envfrq gb gur cbjre mreb, bar, gjb rgp.

    Because 1+1=2!

    Phil
    --
    We are no longer hunters and nomads. No longer awed and frightened, as we have gained some understanding of the world in which we live. As such, we can cast aside childish remnants from the dawn of our civilization.
    -- NotSanguine on SoylentNews, after Eugen Weber in /The Western Tradition/
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From David Entwistle@qnivq.ragjvfgyr@ogvagrearg.pbz to rec.puzzles on Wed Jul 23 08:33:49 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.puzzles

    On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 22:06:42 +0300, Phil Carmody wrote:

    Because 1+1=2!

    Is that it?

    I was thinking more along the lines of the following, where DR is the
    digital root (the sum of the digits repeated until you get to a single
    digit), why are these two sequences the same?

    2^0 = 1, DR = 1
    2^1 = 2, DR = 2
    2^2 = 4, DR = 4
    2^3 = 8, DR = 8
    2^4 = 16, DR = 7
    2^5 = 32, DR = 5
    2^6 = 64, DR = 1
    2^7 = 128, DR = 2

    11^0 = 1, DR = 1
    11^1 = 11, DR = 2
    11^2 = 121, DR = 4
    11^3 = 1331, DR = 8
    11^4 = 14641, DR = 7
    11^5 = 161051, DR = 5
    11^7 = 1771561, DR = 1
    11^7 = 19487171, DR = 2

    I'm thinking it's because the digital root is a Mod(9) calculation and 11
    % 9 = 2. But I may be losing the plot.
    --
    David Entwistle
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From David Entwistle@qnivq.ragjvfgyr@ogvagrearg.pbz to rec.puzzles on Thu Jul 24 05:32:47 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.puzzles

    On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 22:06:42 +0300, Phil Carmody wrote:

    Because 1+1=2!

    On reflection, I see that is the reason. I've been over-thinking it and
    not fully understanding the fundamentals.

    Thanks.
    --
    David Entwistle
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From David Entwistle@qnivq.ragjvfgyr@ogvagrearg.pbz to rec.puzzles on Thu Jul 24 17:21:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.puzzles

    On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 05:32:47 -0000 (UTC), David Entwistle wrote:

    On reflection, I see that is the reason. I've been over-thinking it and
    not fully understanding the fundamentals.

    Or, possibly not. I'm feeling a little fragile at the moment and I need to think about this. It's all good, only numbers and a bit of a puzzle,
    should be fun.
    --
    David Entwistle
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2