Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 23 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 54:33:15 |
Calls: | 583 |
Files: | 1,139 |
D/L today: |
179 files (27,921K bytes) |
Messages: | 111,800 |
Is this not the Moser Circle Problem, stated in a different manner?
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences .......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequence .......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequenc .......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequen
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Seque
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequ
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Seq
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Se
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer S
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedia of Intege
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integ
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedia of Inte
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedia of Int
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedia of In
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedia of I
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedia of
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedia of
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedia o
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedia
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedia
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclopedi
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encycloped
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclope
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclop
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyclo
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encycl
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Encyc
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Ency
.......Spoiler from The On-Line Enc
.......Spoiler from The On-Line En
.......Spoiler from The On-Line E
.......Spoiler from The On-Line
.......Spoiler from The On-Line
.......Spoiler from The On-Lin
.......Spoiler from The On-Li
.......Spoiler from The On-L
.......Spoiler from The On-
.......Spoiler from The On
.......Spoiler from The O
.......Spoiler from The
.......Spoiler from The
.......Spoiler from Th
.......Spoiler from T
.......Spoiler from
.......Spoiler from
.......Spoiler fro
.......Spoiler fr
.......Spoiler f
.......Spoiler
.......Spoiler
.......Spoile
.......Spoil
.......Spoi
.......Spo
.......Sp
.......S
.......
......
.....
....
...
..
.
Take a circular slice of potato, place it on the table, and see into how large a number of pieces you can divide it with six cuts of a knife.
On 23/08/2025 08:35, David Entwistle wrote:
Take a circular slice of potato, place it on the table, and see
into how large a number of pieces you can divide it with six
cuts of a knife.
Would anyone like to attempt a solution for the maximal division
of a solid, roughly spherical, potato dissected by n planes?
My imagination suggests:
n = 0, 1 piece.
n = 1, 2 pieces.
n = 2, 4 pieces.
n = 3, 8 pieces.
So far so good. At this point I resorted to cutting a real
potato, and with n = 4 got 13 pieces, but as every piece had skin
on it, I suspect my cuts did not result in the maximal number of
pieces. 16 suggests itself as a obvious answer, but I'd not be
very confident in that assertion.
Any takers?
Would anyone like to attempt a solution for the maximal division of a
solid, roughly spherical, potato dissected by n planes?
On 23/08/2025 08:35, David Entwistle wrote:
Take a circular slice of potato, place it on the table, and see into
how large a number of pieces you can divide it with six cuts of a knife.
Would anyone like to attempt a solution for the maximal division of a
solid, roughly spherical, potato dissected by n planes?
My imagination suggests:
n = 0, 1 piece.
n = 1, 2 pieces.
n = 2, 4 pieces.
n = 3, 8 pieces.
So far so good. At this point I resorted to cutting a real potato, and
with n = 4 got 13 pieces, but as every piece had skin on it, I suspect
my cuts did not result in the maximal number of pieces. 16 suggests
itself as a obvious answer, but I'd not be very confident in that
assertion.
Any takers?