• Re: Fat discrimination

    From Jerry Sauk@jerrysauk@hotmail.com to rec.food.cooking,alt.food.fast-food,soc.support.fat-acceptance on Fri Oct 10 15:23:18 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking


    "Bruce" <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote in message news:10b6nfd$17qt6$1@dont-email.me...
    On Fri, 26 Sep 2025 13:07:32 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
    <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:


    "Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.naw> wrote in message >>news:8930bkd2l43bd2dh7d659ht2bj7rhisd14@4ax.com...

    If you eat so much you end up weighing over 400 pounds, as is
    reported you do, though it's reported by Marston, so you may weigh
    considerably more, you have an addiction.

    Incorrect, as usual. If a skinny person ate the same amount of food that >>a
    400 pound person does, that would be a considered a addiction for the >>SKINNY
    person to eat that much food. But to a overwight person, a larger amount >>of
    food is NORMAL and not a addiction.

    For a normal person to use heroin implies addiction. For a junkie to
    use heroin is NORMAL and not an addiction. Right?


    That logic is foulty, becouse heroin is a DRUG and not nessecary for human's to be healthy, like food is. THEREFORE, the normal amount of herion for EVERYBODY is the same... ZERO.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jerry Sauk@jerrysauk@hotmail.com to rec.food.cooking,alt.food.fast-food,soc.support.fat-acceptance on Fri Oct 10 15:27:08 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking


    "KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message news:v0bidkdg0qoj5v5q9248buc0743m4auf8t@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
    On Fri, 26 Sep 2025 13:04:04 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
    <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:


    "KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>message

    Caloric requirements for adults are known. It's scientific fact.

    Of course!


    Your past claims that obese people need more calories, for example,
    has been proven false.


    Are you claiming that every adult requires the exact same amount of >>calorie's every day?


    Didn't you just read what I wrote?

    You just wrote "Your past claims has been proven false".

    That doesn't answer my question. Try again.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jerry Sauk@jerrysauk@hotmail.com to rec.food.cooking,alt.food.fast-food,soc.support.fat-acceptance on Fri Oct 10 15:25:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking


    "Ed P" <esp@snet.n> wrote in message news:10b6r3l$18q6p$1@dont-email.me...
    On 9/26/2025 2:05 PM, Jerry Sauk wrote:
    "Ed P" <esp@snet.n> wrote in message
    news:108o5fd$10bem$1@dont-email.me...
    On 8/27/2025 3:30 PM, Jerry Sauk wrote:
    "Ed P" <esp@snet.n> wrote in message
    news:106r06q$2ba13$1@dont-email.me...
    On 8/4/2025 2:44 PM, Jerry Sauk wrote:


    Food addiction is the most difficult addiction of all to conquer. >>>>>>
    It's not an addicition. People are REQUIRED to eat, or they get
    malnutrition and DIE. You wouldn't say people are addicted to air
    becouse
    they keep breathing, would you?

    Yes, some nutrition is required.

    Intelligent people though, know that is is an addiction to eat way
    beyond
    that and be morbidly obese. If you eat a half gallon of ice cream or 6 >>>>> donuts at one sitting, you have addictive problems.

    Excuse me, but it;'s not YOUR position to judge how many calorie's are >>>> appropriate for a specific individual's needs. THEREFORE, for some
    people
    this may not be consdiered a addiction.


    If you are morbidly obese you have an addiction problem.

    Caloric need does vary for each individual but excess is excess.

    Excess is NOT excess, becouse for some people, a normal amount of
    calorie's
    would be consdiered "excess" for a skinny person. So your argument is
    invalid.


    No, excess is still excess. Note I said it varies for each individual.


    If it varies for each person like you say, then they are many cases where excess is NOT excess, becouse what it excess for one person IS NOT EXCESS
    for another.


    Sorry about your reading comprehension issues.

    Sorry that your logic is severely impaired.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ed P@esp@snet.n to rec.food.cooking,alt.food.fast-food,soc.support.fat-acceptance on Fri Oct 10 19:17:08 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 10/10/2025 4:25 PM, Jerry Sauk wrote:
    "Ed P" <esp@snet.n> wrote in message news:10b6r3l$18q6p$1@dont-email.me...
    On 9/26/2025 2:05 PM, Jerry Sauk wrote:
    "Ed P" <esp@snet.n> wrote in message
    news:108o5fd$10bem$1@dont-email.me...
    On 8/27/2025 3:30 PM, Jerry Sauk wrote:
    "Ed P" <esp@snet.n> wrote in message
    news:106r06q$2ba13$1@dont-email.me...
    On 8/4/2025 2:44 PM, Jerry Sauk wrote:


    Food addiction is the most difficult addiction of all to conquer. >>>>>>>
    It's not an addicition. People are REQUIRED to eat, or they get >>>>>>> malnutrition and DIE. You wouldn't say people are addicted to air >>>>>>> becouse
    they keep breathing, would you?

    Yes, some nutrition is required.

    Intelligent people though, know that is is an addiction to eat way >>>>>> beyond
    that and be morbidly obese. If you eat a half gallon of ice cream or 6 >>>>>> donuts at one sitting, you have addictive problems.

    Excuse me, but it;'s not YOUR position to judge how many calorie's are >>>>> appropriate for a specific individual's needs. THEREFORE, for some
    people
    this may not be consdiered a addiction.


    If you are morbidly obese you have an addiction problem.

    Caloric need does vary for each individual but excess is excess.

    Excess is NOT excess, becouse for some people, a normal amount of
    calorie's
    would be consdiered "excess" for a skinny person. So your argument is
    invalid.


    No, excess is still excess. Note I said it varies for each individual.


    If it varies for each person like you say, then they are many cases where excess is NOT excess, becouse what it excess for one person IS NOT EXCESS
    for another.

    Correct but too much it too much and you get fat. Simple. If you go
    above a healthy weight you are consuming excess. For one person it may
    be 1100 calories, another may be 1400, but if either one consumes 1800,
    it is excess.

    Sorry that your logic is severely impaired.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From KlausSchadenfreude@klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com to rec.food.cooking,alt.food.fast-food,soc.support.fat-acceptance on Fri Oct 10 16:29:28 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 15:27:08 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
    <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:


    "KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:v0bidkdg0qoj5v5q9248buc0743m4auf8t@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
    On Fri, 26 Sep 2025 13:04:04 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
    <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:


    "KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>message

    Caloric requirements for adults are known. It's scientific fact.

    Of course!


    Your past claims that obese people need more calories, for example,
    has been proven false.


    Are you claiming that every adult requires the exact same amount of >>>calorie's every day?


    Didn't you just read what I wrote?

    You just wrote "Your past claims has been proven false".

    That doesn't answer my question. Try again.

    You lied when you claimed "obese people need more calories."

    Try concentrating on that.



    --
    NOTICE TO JENNY: please try to post fast food reviews
    and comments in the future instead of just demonstrating
    your NEED to lie and be caught lying over and over again.


    "I currently deny, and deny that I always did, have a need to lie."
    Jenny, lying again.
    Message-ID: <WfCdnaNz7olXf-L1nZ2dnZfqn_cAAAAA@supernews.com> http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From KlausSchadenfreude@klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com to rec.food.cooking,alt.food.fast-food,soc.support.fat-acceptance on Fri Oct 10 16:31:24 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 15:25:33 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
    <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:


    "Ed P" <esp@snet.n> wrote in message news:10b6r3l$18q6p$1@dont-email.me...
    On 9/26/2025 2:05 PM, Jerry Sauk wrote:
    "Ed P" <esp@snet.n> wrote in message
    news:108o5fd$10bem$1@dont-email.me...
    On 8/27/2025 3:30 PM, Jerry Sauk wrote:
    "Ed P" <esp@snet.n> wrote in message
    news:106r06q$2ba13$1@dont-email.me...
    On 8/4/2025 2:44 PM, Jerry Sauk wrote:


    Food addiction is the most difficult addiction of all to conquer. >>>>>>>
    It's not an addicition. People are REQUIRED to eat, or they get >>>>>>> malnutrition and DIE. You wouldn't say people are addicted to air >>>>>>> becouse
    they keep breathing, would you?

    Yes, some nutrition is required.

    Intelligent people though, know that is is an addiction to eat way >>>>>> beyond
    that and be morbidly obese. If you eat a half gallon of ice cream or 6 >>>>>> donuts at one sitting, you have addictive problems.

    Excuse me, but it;'s not YOUR position to judge how many calorie's are >>>>> appropriate for a specific individual's needs. THEREFORE, for some
    people
    this may not be consdiered a addiction.


    If you are morbidly obese you have an addiction problem.

    Caloric need does vary for each individual but excess is excess.

    Excess is NOT excess, becouse for some people, a normal amount of
    calorie's
    would be consdiered "excess" for a skinny person. So your argument is
    invalid.


    No, excess is still excess. Note I said it varies for each individual.


    If it varies for each person like you say, then they are many cases where >excess is NOT excess, becouse what it excess for one person IS NOT EXCESS >for another.

    That's correct. A person that exercises or works hard burns more
    calories therefore needs more calories.

    An obese person such as yourself needs LESS calories even if you work
    hard or exercise, because of the amount of blubber stored on your
    corpulent excuse for a body will provide calories.




    --
    NOTICE TO JENNY: please try to post fast food reviews
    and comments in the future instead of just demonstrating
    your NEED to lie and be caught lying over and over again.


    "I currently deny, and deny that I always did, have a need to lie."
    Jenny, lying again.
    Message-ID: <WfCdnaNz7olXf-L1nZ2dnZfqn_cAAAAA@supernews.com> http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kenito Benito@Kenito@Benito.naw to rec.food.cooking,alt.food.fast-food,soc.support.fat-acceptance on Sat Oct 11 00:28:26 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 15:25:33 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
    <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

    [...]

    Caloric need does vary for each individual but excess is excess.

    Excess is NOT excess, becouse for some people, a normal amount of
    calorie's
    would be consdiered "excess" for a skinny person. So your argument is
    invalid.

    No, excess is still excess. Note I said it varies for each individual.

    If it varies for each person like you say, then they are many cases where >excess is NOT excess, becouse

    Your LYING via spelling is acknowledged.

    what it excess for one person IS NOT EXCESS
    for another.


    If someone runs three miles every day, they will ingest more
    calories to fuel the physical activity. If someone just sits in their
    parents' basement eating only fast food (spending $120 a day on it, if
    his claim was/is honest), he will need far fewer calories to live.
    Obese people, like you, cited above, actually need FEWER
    calories, since they aren't doing anything other than normal
    physiological living. Ordering Door Dash isn't anything that requires additional calories.
    Except in rare occasions, they're obese because they have chosen
    to consume considerably more calories than they require.


    Sorry about your reading comprehension issues.

    Sorry that your logic is severely impaired.

    Ed's logic is sound. You just have a mental illness that makes
    you NEED to lie.

    [Cue Jenny running away from the truth. Or diverting from it.]
    --
    A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk. http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From marston shores@kp@of.fire to rec.food.cooking,alt.food.fast-food,soc.support.fat-acceptance on Wed Oct 15 18:05:57 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 9/26/2025 12:04 PM, Jerry Sauk wrote:
    I weigh enough to require additional calorie's to live.


    Your brother says you are nearly 600 pounds.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From marston shores@kp@of.fire to rec.food.cooking,alt.food.fast-food,soc.support.fat-acceptance on Wed Oct 15 18:07:02 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 9/26/2025 12:04 PM, Jerry Sauk wrote:
    Are you claiming that every adult requires the exact same amount of
    calorie's every day?


    You need to be on a 500 calorie a day diet until you can stand up
    without being short of breath. Your brother told me all about you.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From marston shores@kp@of.fire to rec.food.cooking,alt.food.fast-food,soc.support.fat-acceptance on Wed Oct 15 18:07:57 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 9/26/2025 12:05 PM, Jerry Sauk wrote:
    Excess is NOT excess,


    It is, retard!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2