• Re: How are illegals arrested

    From Jeff Liebermann@jeffl@cruzio.com to rec.bicycles.tech on Wed Aug 6 18:45:57 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.bicycles.tech

    On Thu, 07 Aug 2025 00:27:04 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    Liebermann - is there some manner to show how smart you are without tripping over your own shoelaces? You AREN'T smart. You barely register on the intelligence scale. Without Google you couldn't say one thing accurately. And you continually show that English is a foreign language to you.

    Tom. You posted 35 messages today (08/06/2025) between 12:36PM PDT
    and 5:41PM PDT. That means you were on your computer for at least 5
    hours at an average rate of 8.57 minutes per message. On behalf of
    the readers of rec.bicycles.tech, please permit me to thank you for
    your Herculean effort in keeping rec.bicycles.tech filled with
    off-topic and politicized drivel. Also, I would like to thank you for
    limiting most of your comments to one or two lines. Quantity usually
    does trump quality: <https://www.google.com/search?q=quantity%20trumps%20quality>

    After 5 hrs on the computer, you deserve a break. I suggest that you
    take some time off and use it learn how to type, spell, operate a
    keyboard and to write without being insulting.

    Also, please accept my apology for changing your topic. Since you do
    it so often, I assume you consider it acceptable.
    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John B.@jbslocomb@fictitious.site to rec.bicycles.tech on Wed Aug 6 19:20:24 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.bicycles.tech

    On Wed, 06 Aug 2025 20:21:36 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Wed Jul 23 05:23:52 2025 zen cycle wrote:
    On 7/22/2025 8:49 AM, AMuzi wrote:


    No, it does not.
    As the difference between:

    https://www.clarionledger.com/story/news/local/2025/06/25/mississippi-
    executes-richard-jordan-after-nearly-50-years-on-death-row/84316151007/

    and:

    https://innocenceproject.org/



    Sorry, there is no analogy there.




    I suppose living in New Hampsure makes your brain as small as your state.

    Nope, but it does mean that you re living in the safest (lowest crime
    rate) in the Nation.
    --
    cheers,

    John B.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From zen cycle@funkmasterxx@hotmail.com to rec.bicycles.tech on Thu Aug 7 08:24:17 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.bicycles.tech

    On 8/6/2025 10:20 PM, John B. wrote:
    On Wed, 06 Aug 2025 20:21:36 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Wed Jul 23 05:23:52 2025 zen cycle wrote:
    On 7/22/2025 8:49 AM, AMuzi wrote:


    No, it does not.
    As the difference between:

    https://www.clarionledger.com/story/news/local/2025/06/25/mississippi- >>>> executes-richard-jordan-after-nearly-50-years-on-death-row/84316151007/ >>>>
    and:

    https://innocenceproject.org/



    Sorry, there is no analogy there.




    I suppose living in New Hampsure makes your brain as small as your state.

    I don't live in new hampshire, you fucking idiot.


    Nope, but it does mean that you re living in the safest (lowest crime
    rate) in the Nation.
    --
    cheers,

    John B.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jeff Liebermann@jeffl@cruzio.com to rec.bicycles.tech on Thu Aug 7 11:56:08 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.bicycles.tech

    On Thu, 07 Aug 2025 17:39:06 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat Jul 19 07:33:34 2025 zen cycle wrote:

    As well as https://adpemploymentreport.com/
    "Private employers shed 33,000 jobs in June"

    People are so unhapp with President Trump, that you just watch how they disavow him in the midterms.

    What vow are you talking about? I didn't take a vow to President
    Trump. Did you? If you mean that people, who lost their jobs, might
    not vote for him again, that's quite possible. However, he's not
    running for re-election in 2026 so everyone will need to wait for the
    next presidential election in Nov 2028.

    Flunky, you're pitiful.
    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From zen cycle@funkmasterxx@hotmail.com to rec.bicycles.tech on Sun Aug 10 06:31:17 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.bicycles.tech

    On 8/7/2025 2:56 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Thu, 07 Aug 2025 17:39:06 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat Jul 19 07:33:34 2025 zen cycle wrote:

    As well as https://adpemploymentreport.com/
    "Private employers shed 33,000 jobs in June"

    People are so unhapp with President Trump, that you just watch how they disavow him in the midterms.

    What vow are you talking about? I didn't take a vow to President
    Trump. Did you?

    Yes, he did.

    If you mean that people, who lost their jobs, might
    not vote for him again, that's quite possible. However, he's not
    running for re-election in 2026 so everyone will need to wait for the
    next presidential election in Nov 2028.

    Flunky, you're pitiful.

    no, you fucking idiot, the jobs reports are pitiful. Any one who like
    you blindly follows this "president" (or any president for that matter)
    is pitiful. You're just too fucking stupid to realize it.



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From AMuzi@am@yellowjersey.org to rec.bicycles.tech on Sun Aug 10 09:13:43 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.bicycles.tech

    On 8/10/2025 5:31 AM, zen cycle wrote:
    On 8/7/2025 2:56 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Thu, 07 Aug 2025 17:39:06 GMT, cyclintom
    <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat Jul 19 07:33:34 2025 zen cycle-a wrote:

    As well as https://adpemploymentreport.com/
    "Private employers shed 33,000 jobs in June"

    People are so unhapp with President Trump, that you just
    watch how they disavow him in the midterms.

    What vow are you talking about?-a I didn't take a vow to
    President
    Trump.-a Did you?

    Yes, he did.

    If you mean that people, who lost their jobs, might
    not vote for him again, that's quite possible.-a However,
    he's not
    running for re-election in 2026 so everyone will need to
    wait for the
    next presidential election in Nov 2028.

    Flunky, you're pitiful.

    no, you fucking idiot, the jobs reports are pitiful. Any one
    who like you blindly follows this "president" (or any
    president for that matter) is pitiful. You're just too
    fucking stupid to realize it.




    I don't know and I don't have a theory but the absolutely
    unbelievable numbers from 2d % 3d quarter 2024 are equally
    suspect.

    It's been several years since BLS reported number of people
    who paid payroll taxes last quarter. I've scoured their
    website. It's no longer there. Everything else is
    "adjusted" i.e., "edited for political purposes" to various
    degrees in various directions for various purposes.
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jeff Liebermann@jeffl@cruzio.com to rec.bicycles.tech on Sun Aug 10 11:25:40 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.bicycles.tech

    On Sun, 10 Aug 2025 09:13:43 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 8/10/2025 5:31 AM, zen cycle wrote:
    On 8/7/2025 2:56 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Thu, 07 Aug 2025 17:39:06 GMT, cyclintom
    <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat Jul 19 07:33:34 2025 zen cyclea wrote:

    As well as https://adpemploymentreport.com/
    "Private employers shed 33,000 jobs in June"

    People are so unhapp with President Trump, that you just
    watch how they disavow him in the midterms.

    What vow are you talking about?a I didn't take a vow to
    President
    Trump.a Did you?

    Yes, he did.

    If you mean that people, who lost their jobs, might
    not vote for him again, that's quite possible.a However,
    he's not
    running for re-election in 2026 so everyone will need to
    wait for the
    next presidential election in Nov 2028.

    Flunky, you're pitiful.

    no, you fucking idiot, the jobs reports are pitiful. Any one
    who like you blindly follows this "president" (or any
    president for that matter) is pitiful. You're just too
    fucking stupid to realize it.



    I don't know and I don't have a theory but the absolutely
    unbelievable numbers from 2d % 3d quarter 2024 are equally
    suspect.

    It's been several years since BLS reported number of people
    who paid payroll taxes last quarter. I've scoured their
    website. It's no longer there. Everything else is
    "adjusted" i.e., "edited for political purposes" to various
    degrees in various directions for various purposes.

    Is this what you're looking for?
    "THE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION - JULY 2025" <https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf>

    Page 8:
    "6. Is the count of unemployed people limited to just those receiving unemployment insurance benefits?"
    "No. The estimate of unemployment is based on a monthly sample survey
    of households. All people who are without jobs and are actively
    seeking and available to work are included among the unemployed."

    Translation: The BLS does not count the number of people who have
    been laid off. Instead, they use statistical sampling to estimate the
    number of unemployed, which can be a population as little as 1500
    workers for the entire US workforce (170.7 million in Jan 2025) <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labor_force_in_the_United_States>
    (The graphs of the labor force vs year are interesting).

    Minimum sample size calculator: <https://www.calculator.net/sample-size-calculator.html>

    For a time, unemployment was calculated by the number for unemployment insurance claims. The BLS decided that if someone was NOT collecting unemployment insurance, they have given up seeking employment and are
    therefore NOT counted as being unemployed.
    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From AMuzi@am@yellowjersey.org to rec.bicycles.tech on Sun Aug 10 13:54:09 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.bicycles.tech

    On 8/10/2025 1:25 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sun, 10 Aug 2025 09:13:43 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 8/10/2025 5:31 AM, zen cycle wrote:
    On 8/7/2025 2:56 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Thu, 07 Aug 2025 17:39:06 GMT, cyclintom
    <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat Jul 19 07:33:34 2025 zen cycle-a wrote:

    As well as https://adpemploymentreport.com/
    "Private employers shed 33,000 jobs in June"

    People are so unhapp with President Trump, that you just
    watch how they disavow him in the midterms.

    What vow are you talking about?-a I didn't take a vow to
    President
    Trump.-a Did you?

    Yes, he did.

    If you mean that people, who lost their jobs, might
    not vote for him again, that's quite possible.-a However,
    he's not
    running for re-election in 2026 so everyone will need to
    wait for the
    next presidential election in Nov 2028.

    Flunky, you're pitiful.

    no, you fucking idiot, the jobs reports are pitiful. Any one
    who like you blindly follows this "president" (or any
    president for that matter) is pitiful. You're just too
    fucking stupid to realize it.



    I don't know and I don't have a theory but the absolutely
    unbelievable numbers from 2d % 3d quarter 2024 are equally
    suspect.

    It's been several years since BLS reported number of people
    who paid payroll taxes last quarter. I've scoured their
    website. It's no longer there. Everything else is
    "adjusted" i.e., "edited for political purposes" to various
    degrees in various directions for various purposes.

    Is this what you're looking for?
    "THE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION - JULY 2025" <https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf>

    Page 8:
    "6. Is the count of unemployed people limited to just those receiving unemployment insurance benefits?"
    "No. The estimate of unemployment is based on a monthly sample survey
    of households. All people who are without jobs and are actively
    seeking and available to work are included among the unemployed."

    Translation: The BLS does not count the number of people who have
    been laid off. Instead, they use statistical sampling to estimate the
    number of unemployed, which can be a population as little as 1500
    workers for the entire US workforce (170.7 million in Jan 2025) <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labor_force_in_the_United_States>
    (The graphs of the labor force vs year are interesting).

    Minimum sample size calculator: <https://www.calculator.net/sample-size-calculator.html>

    For a time, unemployment was calculated by the number for unemployment insurance claims. The BLS decided that if someone was NOT collecting unemployment insurance, they have given up seeking employment and are therefore NOT counted as being unemployed.






    Yep, same problem. That's the inverse set.

    "Official" unemployment numbers are meaningless and I've
    ignored them for over 40 years, But we used to know the
    actual employment numbers which is no longer the case.
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jeff Liebermann@jeffl@cruzio.com to rec.bicycles.tech on Sat Aug 16 14:27:36 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.bicycles.tech

    On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 19:35:09 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    PLA is polylactic acid, a thermoplastic.

    That's only one of 79 other PLA acronyms. <https://www.acronymfinder.com/PLA.html>
    I rather like Programmable Logic Array. Keep trying. Trial and error
    will help you eventually find the correct acronym.

    How about this acronym?
    "Phone Losers of America"
    <https://phonelosers.com>

    Hint: Thou shalt not abrev.
    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2